Tics vs Stimming and Stereotypies: How Repetitive Movements Differ
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Tic Disorders, Tourette Syndrome & Repetitive Behaviors · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Repetitive movement is an observation, not a diagnosis. A sudden shoulder jerk, rhythmic hand flapping, and repeated rocking can look similar to an observer while having different developmental histories, sensory experiences, purposes, and implications for care. A useful distinction considers how a movement begins, what it feels like, how it changes, and whether it causes distress or impairment.
Tics are generally sudden, brief, recurrent movements or sounds that vary over time. Motor stereotypies are usually more patterned, rhythmic, and sustained repetitive movements, often emerging in very early childhood. Stimming is a widely used term for repetitive movements, sounds, or sensory activities that may help regulate arousal, attention, emotion, or sensory input. Stimming and stereotypies overlap substantially, but they describe different aspects of experience. These distinctions are discussed in a comparative clinical review, a systematic review of co-occurrence, and research with autistic adults.
A movement's shape never establishes a diagnosis by itself. The same person can have tics and stims, and a harmless repetitive movement may require no clinical intervention. This guide explains the similarities, the strongest differential clues, the limitations of observation, and how assessment and support should be adapted to the person.
The core distinctions at a glance
A typical tic is relatively rapid and nonrhythmic and may be preceded by an uncomfortable urge that briefly improves when the tic occurs. Its form and frequency often change over weeks or months. A typical motor stereotypy has an identifiable repeated sequence, may be rhythmic, and often starts before age three. A stim is defined more by a person's use or experience of repetitive sensory or motor activity; it can be rhythmic or irregular, intentional or spontaneous, enjoyable or regulating. These are useful tendencies rather than necessary-and-sufficient tests. Comparative review.
A clinician therefore does not diagnose a tic from a blinking video, diagnose autism from hand flapping, or infer voluntary behavior because someone can pause the movement. They examine onset, sensation, duration, pattern, associated symptoms, development, and the person's own account. The European clinical guideline for tic assessment emphasizes history, context, co-occurring conditions, and selective examination.
What is a tic?
A tic is a sudden, rapid, recurrent, nonrhythmic movement or vocalization. Motor tics involve movements, such as eye blinking, facial grimacing, nose twitching, shoulder shrugging, head jerking, or more coordinated gestures. Vocal, also called phonic, tics involve sounds produced through moving air, such as sniffing, throat clearing, grunting, or sometimes syllables and words. Simple tics involve a limited movement or sound; complex tics consist of more coordinated sequences. These distinctions describe symptoms, not separate diagnoses. CDC diagnostic guidance.
Tics are commonly described as involuntary or partly suppressible. Someone may resist a tic during class or a meeting, yet experience considerable effort, discomfort, or an increasing urge. Tics can wax and wane, and a person's repertoire may evolve over time: one movement becomes less prominent, while another appears. In some people, the frequency and complexity change with age. ESSTS assessment guideline.
Premonitory urges and the feeling before a tic
Many people with tics describe a premonitory urge: pressure, tension, tingling, or an uncomfortable internal feeling that something needs to move or make a sound. Performing the tic may briefly relieve this feeling. However, not everyone reports an urge, especially younger children or people who find bodily sensations difficult to identify or describe. Urge awareness often emerges later than the first tics. A recent scoping review documents the diversity of premonitory experiences and the limits of current measurement.
The ability to postpone a tic does not mean that its origin is voluntary. A person may show few symptoms during a consultation because attention, effort, or context changes their expression. Suppression can also have costs, including distraction or fatigue. Describing this experience accurately avoids the common mistake of interpreting control over timing as control over whether the symptom exists. American Academy of Neurology guideline.
A tic is not automatically a tic disorder
A brief period of blinking, shrugging, or vocal sounds is insufficient for a diagnosis of Tourette syndrome. Clinicians distinguish provisional tic disorder, persistent motor or vocal tic disorder, and Tourette syndrome according to the number and types of tics, age at onset, duration, and medical exclusions. Tourette syndrome requires multiple motor tics and at least one vocal tic at some time during the course, with onset before age 18 and more than one year since the first tic; motor and vocal tics need not occur simultaneously. CDC criteria.
A tic disorder may coexist with ADHD, OCD, anxiety symptoms, or autism, but each condition has independent clinical requirements. A symptom scale or online checklist can support discussion but cannot establish a diagnosis by itself. The person may need assessment of pain, interference, other neurodevelopmental features, sleep, medications, and neurological warning signs. ESSTS assessment.
What is stimming?
Stimming is the common shorthand for self-stimulatory behavior. People use it to describe repetitive motor, vocal, tactile, or sensory actions such as rocking, finger movements, tapping, pacing, humming, rubbing textures, or looking at moving patterns. The term is especially familiar in autistic communities but also describes activities experienced by people without autism. Stimming itself is neither a DSM-5-TR diagnosis nor proof of an underlying disorder.
For one person, rocking makes a noisy room easier to tolerate; for another, tapping maintains alertness; for another, hand movements express excitement or enjoyment. A single action can have several functions, which can change across situations. In a qualitative study involving 32 autistic adults, participants often characterized stimming as self-regulation and described distress caused by social pressure to hide it. That study illuminates lived experience; it does not quantify the function of every stim in the population.
Stimming can be deliberate, spontaneous, or difficult to pause without discomfort. It can be subtle, such as rubbing fingertips, or conspicuous, such as rocking or moving one's arms. In some contexts it supports concentration and participation. In others, the person may need help to modify an action that causes injury or prevents an activity they value. The useful clinical question is what the movement does for the person and whether any consequence needs attention. Rethinking Stereotypies in Autism.
Stimming is not exclusive to autism
Repetitive sensory and motor regulation occurs across different developmental profiles. Everyday foot tapping, rhythmic movement to music, manipulating a small object during concentration, or humming can be described in these terms, depending on the person and context. Autism diagnosis concerns a broader developmental constellation, including social-communication characteristics and restricted or repetitive patterns; a single example of stimming cannot establish autism. Differential diagnosis review.
What are motor stereotypies?
Motor stereotypies are repetitive movements with a consistent, recognizable form. Examples include hand flapping or rotating, finger wiggling, bilateral arm movements, body rocking, rhythmic head nodding, or repeated sequences involving the trunk. They frequently begin during the first three years of life, may persist for years, and often arise during excitement, boredom, absorbed attention, or stress. Their movement patterns are often more rhythmic, prolonged, and predictable than typical tics. Johns Hopkins overview; comparative clinical review.
Stereotypies occur in children with typical development, autistic children and adults, and individuals with various neurodevelopmental conditions. Primary motor stereotypies describes stereotyped movement patterns without an associated developmental or neurological diagnosis. Stereotypic movement disorder is a separate clinical diagnosis used when repetitive motor behavior produces clinically significant interference or self-injury risk, subject to other criteria. A familiar hand movement that is safe and helps someone regulate need not be classified as a disorder. Systematic review.
Where stereotypies and stimming overlap
A repeated hand-flapping pattern can accurately be described as a motor stereotypy by a clinician and as stimming by the person who experiences it. The first term describes observable movement form and developmental phenomenology; the second emphasizes the sensory, attentional, or emotional role understood by the individual. Some research uses the words closely or interchangeably, while other work maintains a narrower motor definition of stereotypy. Conceptual analysis.
Neither term should erase the other perspective. A stereotyped movement can occur without a conscious or enjoyable purpose, and repetitive sensory activities such as humming or object manipulation may be called stimming without fitting a narrowly defined motor stereotypy. Asking what the movement feels like can be as important as describing what it looks like.
Seven clues for distinguishing tics, stimming, and stereotypies
1. Age at onset and developmental history
Primary complex motor stereotypies usually begin in infancy or toddlerhood, while tics more commonly emerge in early school-age childhood. A stable repeated arm pattern present since age two suggests a different history from new blinking and shoulder movements beginning around age six. The history is informative rather than decisive: early tics can be overlooked, memories are imperfect, and multiple movement types may coexist. Martino and Hedderly.
2. Rhythm, speed, and duration
A simple tic is often a rapid, isolated jerk or sound; several tics can also occur in clusters, and complex tics can involve longer coordinated actions. Motor stereotypies more often involve rhythmic and repeated sequences lasting seconds to minutes. Many stims involve prolonged movement or sensory engagement, although some are brief. There is overlap in each dimension, so no fixed number of seconds or repetitions can separate the categories reliably. Clinical review.
3. What the person feels before and afterward
An uncomfortable premonitory urge followed by transient relief favors tic phenomenology when other historical features agree. A person may instead describe rocking or rubbing an object as pleasurable, soothing, organizing, or useful for processing excitement. Sensory discomfort or relief can accompany more than one movement category, and the person may lack language to characterize the experience. Asking an open question about sensation is more informative than requiring a yes-or-no response about an urge. Premonitory urge review; autistic adult interviews.
4. Interruptibility and temporary suppression
Stereotypies may pause when the person is engaged or distracted and return afterward. Tics may similarly diminish during focused activity or be intentionally postponed, often with a cost. Some stims can be replaced with another sensory action, but interruption may remove an effective coping strategy. Because every category may be interruptible, asking a child to stop on command does not serve as a reliable diagnostic test and may increase distress. ESSTS guideline.
5. Stability of movement form
A primary stereotypy may look much the same across years, even if frequency changes. Tic symptoms commonly evolve in form, location, number, and severity. A person may keep a favorite stim or change activities according to available sensory input and needs. Clinicians therefore seek a longitudinal picture instead of treating a single recording as representative of the person's entire life. Cavanna and colleagues' systematic review.
6. Emotion, attention, and sensory context
Excitement, anxiety, fatigue, boredom, and sensory overload can affect several types of repetition. Some people stim more when trying to focus or calm down; stereotypies may occur during absorbed activity or excitement; tics also fluctuate with context and arousal. An increase during anxiety alone does not identify the movement as a tic. Likewise, a quiet office encounter does not rule out tic symptoms recorded elsewhere. Johns Hopkins; ESSTS guideline.
7. Pain, distress, injury, and participation
A movement that helps someone feel regulated and causes no harm may call for understanding and environmental accommodation. A tic producing neck pain, injury, or communication problems may justify targeted treatment. A stereotypy that causes injury or substantially interferes with participation deserves individualized assessment. The movement's clinical importance is determined by safety, function, the person's goals, and the broader condition rather than by how noticeable it appears to others. AAN guideline; qualitative autistic adult study.
Examples: how similar movements can mean different things
Hand flapping and finger movements
Bilateral rhythmic hand flapping during excitement, particularly if it started in toddlerhood and repeats in a familiar sequence, fits common descriptions of motor stereotypies and stimming. Brief, irregular, rapidly changing gestures may instead raise a tic differential. A person's experience, coexisting movements, onset, and developmental history are needed. Neither hand flapping nor finger movements alone establish autism or Tourette syndrome. Comparative review.
Eye blinking and facial movement
Recurrent rapid eye blinking is a common simple motor tic, but it can also accompany eye irritation, allergies, visual problems, or other motor patterns. A clinician will ask about ocular discomfort, redness, medication exposure, timing, and other movements rather than labeling all blinking as a tic. More complex facial movements may also merit neurological assessment depending on the history. ESSTS clinical assessment.
Rocking and swaying
Sustained rhythmic body rocking while concentrating, feeling excited, or managing sensory input often resembles a motor stereotypy or stim. A person may use it consciously or feel that it helps them remain comfortable. Isolated rocking is generally less typical of a simple tic, but unusual motor phenomena can overlap and the movement itself does not reveal underlying motives or diagnoses. Johns Hopkins motor stereotypies overview.
Head jerking and shoulder shrugging
A sudden head jerk or shoulder shrug, especially one preceded by pressure and varying in frequency or location over time, may fit tic phenomenology. Repeated rhythmic coordinated arm-and-head movements that have been nearly identical since early childhood suggest a stereotypy. Painful movements, a sudden change in character, or associated neurological symptoms warrant professional evaluation. Martino and Hedderly.
Humming, throat clearing, and repeated sounds
Throat clearing or grunting can be a vocal tic, but similar sounds may accompany upper-airway irritation, habits, other medical conditions, or self-regulatory humming. Repeated words and phrases can also reflect different speech, language, social, and neurological phenomena. The person’s age, sound pattern, physical symptoms, internal experience, and developmental context help with the differential. Coprolalia, involuntary socially inappropriate language, occurs in only a minority of people with Tourette syndrome and is not a defining requirement. CDC criteria.
Can a person have both tics and stereotypies or stims?
Yes. The categories are not mutually exclusive. Autistic people can have tic disorders, and people with Tourette syndrome may also engage in self-regulatory stimming or have separate motor stereotypies. The presence of autism does not explain every new tic-like movement, and the presence of Tourette syndrome does not turn every repetitive action into a tic. Each movement should be characterized separately. Systematic review.
A systematic review published in Neurological Sciences evaluated six studies of sufficient sample size reporting co-occurring tics and stereotypies. It found clinically meaningful overlap but acknowledged referral bias, different age ranges, diagnostic difficulties, and the exclusion of people with severe developmental conditions from the review's core studies. The reported frequencies should not be converted into a prediction for an individual autistic person or a general-population prevalence claim. Cavanna et al..
A small video-based evaluation of 27 people with severe autism identified movements judged to be possible tics among behavior previously categorized as stereotypy. These were expert assessments of selected recordings, not confirmed diagnoses or a representative prevalence study. The findings illustrate why a clinician may need to ask whether several movement types are present, while remaining cautious about what a video can establish.
How this comparison relates to autism and Tourette syndrome
In autism, restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior, interest, or sensory response form part of a broader diagnostic picture. Stimming may be described by autistic individuals as useful, pleasurable, or necessary for regulation. A tic disorder involves the specific clinical history and pattern of motor or vocal tic symptoms. Autism and Tourette syndrome can coexist, but the presence of a repetitive movement neither confirms nor excludes either diagnosis. Differential diagnosis review; CDC tic criteria.
A child who flaps hands when excited may have a stereotypy with or without autism. A child who develops blinking, sniffing, and shoulder jerks several years later may also need tic assessment. A person may have both and experience them differently. The complete clinical picture includes communication and developmental history, sensory needs, tic onset and course, social environment, functional impact, and coexisting symptoms, rather than a single dramatic observation.
Other repetitive behaviors that may be confused with tics or stimming
Compulsions and OCD
Compulsions may involve checking, repeating, touching, arranging, or other acts performed in response to intrusive thoughts, feared consequences, or uncomfortable 'just-right' experiences. Sensory-driven repetitive actions can blur this distinction, especially when OCD and tic disorders coexist. The key questions concern associated thoughts, feared outcomes, sensory urges, and the function of the act. The detailed OCD-owned discussion is OCD vs Tourette Syndrome: What Is the Difference?.
Hair pulling, skin picking, and other body-focused repetitive behaviors
Hair pulling, skin picking, and related body-focused repetitive behaviors can have their own sensory and emotional functions, as well as condition-specific diagnostic criteria when a disorder is present. Their assessment and treatment evidence differs from tic treatment. A repeated movement involving hair, skin, or nails should not be classified solely by its visible motion. The neighboring OCD-owned article OCD and Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors covers these distinctions.
Functional tic-like behaviors
Functional tic-like behaviors are genuine clinical presentations involving movements and sounds that may differ in their onset, pattern, and development from typical childhood-onset neurodevelopmental tics. Some individuals develop rapid-onset complex symptoms; assessment considers positive clinical features and individual history rather than assumptions that the person is pretending or copying someone. Online exposure or age is never sufficient for a diagnosis. An ESSTS expert consensus describes a proposed diagnostic approach and recognizes the need for prospective validation.
Seizures and other neurological movements
Myoclonus, dystonia, tremor, epileptic events, medication-related movements, and other neurological conditions may enter a differential when the presentation is atypical. Episodes involving loss of awareness, collapse, sustained abnormal postures, or confusion after an event deserve careful evaluation; acute neurological symptoms may require urgent assessment. For ordinary, otherwise typical tic presentations, routine EEG or brain imaging is generally unnecessary. Clinical investigation should follow findings from the history and examination. ESSTS assessment guidance.
How clinicians make the distinction
Clinical evaluation begins with a developmental timeline: when the movement first appeared, what it looked like, whether its form and frequency have changed, and whether other movements or sounds are present. The clinician considers family observations, the individual’s own account, neurodevelopmental features, medications, sensory context, distress, functional consequences, and neurological signs. Tics, stims, stereotypies, compulsions, and functional movements may call for different lines of questioning. European assessment guideline.
If a movement is not seen in the office, a short consent-based recording can sometimes help describe its form. A video is supporting information, not an independent diagnostic test. Standardized tools such as the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale can help measure tic severity once relevant symptoms have been clinically characterized, but a number on a scale does not decide whether rocking is a tic or stim. Additional tests are selected when clinically indicated, rather than ordered routinely for every repetitive movement. ESSTS clinical guideline.
Accessible communication is especially important for younger children and people with communication differences. Clinicians may ask concrete questions about discomfort, pleasure, excitement, relief, and environmental triggers, allow gestures or communication aids, and invite observations from trusted supporters. The lack of a verbal description of an urge is a limitation of the available information, rather than evidence against tic symptoms.
What can be observed at home before an appointment?
A neutral description is more useful than a self-assigned diagnosis: 'brief head movements after a feeling of pressure,' 'rhythmic finger movements during excitement,' or 'rocking during focused work.' Record approximate onset and duration, changes over time, situations in which the movement appears, accompanying sounds, discomfort, possible injury, and whether the person finds it helpful or upsetting. Short videos can be useful when the person consents and their privacy is protected.
Do tics, stereotypies, and stimming need treatment?
Evidence-based care for tics
Treatment is considered when symptoms produce pain, physical injury, functional impairment, substantial distress, or other personally meaningful difficulties. When tics are not impairing, the AAN guideline supports education about their course and watchful waiting. Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) includes awareness training, a competing response, and functional interventions and has evidence for reducing tic severity in appropriate patients. Behavioral treatment requires access, engagement, and individual tailoring; it is not a demonstration that the person could have suppressed every tic all along. CDC treatment guidance.
Medication may be appropriate for more burdensome tic symptoms after weighing expected benefit, adverse effects, co-occurring conditions, and patient preferences. Medicines and behavioral treatments studied for tic disorders should not be assumed to treat autism-related stimming or all forms of motor stereotypy. Treatment research differs by population and intervention. AAN evidence review.
Support for primary motor stereotypies
Many primary motor stereotypies need explanation, practical reassurance, and attention to safety rather than active intervention. When a movement is disruptive or self-injurious, behavioral approaches may be considered with a specialist. A study of parent-delivered behavioral intervention for primary complex motor stereotypies reported encouraging results, but it excluded children with autism, tics, intellectual disability, and known neurological disorders, so its findings should not be generalized to all stimming. Specht and colleagues.
Respecting the self-regulatory role of stimming
If a stim is safe and helps someone regulate or participate, reasonable support may include access to movement breaks, reduced overwhelming sensory input, a suitable environment, and respect for preferred ways of concentrating. If an action hurts the person or repeatedly blocks an activity they value, intervention can focus on safety and alternative regulation without presuming that the behavior itself is undesirable. Evidence for individual accommodations varies, so clinicians should collaborate with the person rather than prescribe a uniform solution. Autistic adults' first-person research.
Practical guidance for families, teachers, and adults
Parents and partners can ask what the person experiences before and after a movement and whether help would make it safer or more comfortable. Avoid public reprimands for involuntary tics, forced demonstrations of control, or interpretations of sensory regulation as defiance. Consider the individual's privacy and consent when collecting videos or discussing movements with teachers and clinicians. Open conversations can help distinguish a painful tic from a helpful stim without pressuring someone to conceal either.
At school, tics may be addressed through individualized accommodations, social support, education about the symptoms, and anti-bullying measures. For stimming, allowing agreed movement or sensory supports can preserve participation. Where repeated behavior substantially interferes with learning or communication, the plan should identify the precise functional difficulty and the person's needs. CDC information for educators.
Adults who have used familiar repetitive sensory actions for years may understand them more clearly after learning about stimming. New or rapidly changing involuntary movements warrant evaluation, especially when they are painful, associated with a medication change, or accompanied by other neurological symptoms. Sudden loss of awareness, prolonged convulsive activity, acute weakness, or marked confusion requires prompt medical attention according to the circumstances.
Common misconceptions
Hand flapping alone does not establish autism. Being able to hold back a tic for a short time does not establish that it is intentional. A vocal tic is not always a word, and coprolalia is not typical of every person with Tourette syndrome. A stable, safe stim does not automatically require suppression. Finally, tics and motor stereotypies can occur together. These points follow from clinical comparison, co-occurrence evidence, and autistic adults' experience.
Frequently asked questions
Is hand flapping a tic or stimming?
It is often described as stimming or a motor stereotypy, particularly when rhythmic and present since early childhood. Some complex tic movements can resemble it. Onset, pattern, associated sensations, and the person's history distinguish the possibilities. Hand flapping by itself does not diagnose autism or Tourette syndrome.
Is rocking back and forth always stimming?
Rocking frequently serves regulation, concentration, excitement, or comfort and can also be described as a stereotypy. It has other possible explanations, and its clinical meaning depends on the individual's context, developmental history, and associated signs.
Can someone have Tourette syndrome and be autistic?
Yes. The conditions can coexist. A person may have both motor or vocal tics and self-regulatory stims or motor stereotypies. Individual assessment should describe the separate movement types and establish each condition's own criteria. Systematic review.
Do non-autistic people stim?
Yes. Repetitive movement and sensory self-regulation occur across people with different developmental profiles. The community term stimming is often associated with autism, but using a repetitive action for comfort or concentration is not a diagnostic test.
Does a premonitory urge prove a tic?
An urge is a useful clue when the whole presentation fits tic phenomenology, but its presence or absence alone is inconclusive. Many young children are not yet able to describe urges, and sensory discomfort or relief may accompany different repeated activities. Scoping review.
If a child stops when distracted, is the movement voluntary?
Distraction may interrupt stereotypies, and tics can also be suppressed briefly or reduced during concentration. Some stims are voluntarily adjusted but remain important for regulation. Interruptibility cannot determine whether a movement is genuine or whether it should be treated. ESSTS guideline.
Are stereotypies a medical diagnosis?
Motor stereotypies describe a movement pattern. Stereotypic movement disorder is a diagnosis used only when its clinical requirements are satisfied, including significant interference or risk of self-injury. A harmless repetitive movement does not automatically indicate a disorder. Clinical systematic review.
Should parents prevent harmless stimming?
If the action is safe and supports regulation, understanding its role and respecting the person's preferences are sound priorities. If an action is self-injurious or prevents important daily activities, collaborative assessment can identify safer alternatives and other supports. Kapp and colleagues.
Can CBIT be used for stimming?
CBIT was developed and studied for tic disorders. Its clinical evidence does not automatically transfer to autism-related stimming or primary motor stereotypies. Different selected behavioral approaches have been studied for primary stereotypies, with important eligibility and generalizability limits. AAN recommendations; stereotypy intervention study.
When should repetitive movements be evaluated?
Evaluation is appropriate when movements begin suddenly, rapidly change, cause pain or self-injury, interfere substantially with life, or occur alongside concerning medical or neurological changes. A safe, familiar stim that helps the person and creates no difficulties may call for acceptance and practical support. ESSTS assessment guideline.
Related Articles
References
American Academy of Neurology. (2019). Practice guideline recommendations summary: Treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology, 92, 896–906. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007466
Cavanna, A. E., Purpura, G., Riva, A., & Nacinovich, R. (2024). Co-morbid tics and stereotypies: A systematic literature review. Neurological Sciences, 45, 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-07095-y
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Diagnosing tic disorders. https://www.cdc.gov/tourette-syndrome/diagnosis/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Treatment of Tourette syndrome. https://www.cdc.gov/tourette-syndrome/treatment/index.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Information for educators about Tourette syndrome. https://www.cdc.gov/tourette-syndrome/info-for-educators/index.html
Johns Hopkins Medicine. (n.d.). Motor stereotypies. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/motor-stereotypies
Kapp, S. K., Steward, R., Crane, L., Elliott, D., Elphick, C., Pellicano, E., & Russell, G. (2019). 'People should be allowed to do what they like': Autistic adults' views and experiences of stimming. Autism, 23, 1782–1792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319829628
Martino, D., & Hedderly, T. (2019). Tics and stereotypies: A comparative clinical review. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.005
Pringsheim, T., et al. (2019). Comprehensive systematic review summary: Treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology, 92, 907–915. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007467
Specht, M. W., et al. (2017). Efficacy of parent-delivered behavioral therapy for primary complex motor stereotypies. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 59, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13164
Szejko, N., et al. (2022). European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders—version 2.0. Part I: Assessment. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01842-2