top of page

Psychological Encyclopedia

Premonitory Urges Before Tics: Sensations, Awareness, and Relief

4 days ago
18 min read

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Tic Disorders, Tourette Syndrome & Repetitive Behaviors · Written by Artificial Sapiens

A premonitory urge is an internal sensation or feeling that comes before a tic. It may resemble mounting pressure, tension, an itch, an uncomfortable awareness of one body part, or a powerful sense that a movement or sound needs to happen. A tic can provide brief relief, although the experience varies considerably between people, between tics, and across stages of life. A 2025 review synthesizing 155 studies documents both the importance of these sensations and how much remains uncertain about their origins. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Understanding premonitory urges helps explain why a tic can feel simultaneously unwanted and partly under conscious control: a person may deliberately perform a movement to release a sensation that arose without invitation. It also helps explain the practical role of noticing early signals in behavioral therapy. Neither the presence nor the absence of a recognizable urge determines whether someone has Tourette syndrome or another tic disorder. Diagnosis depends on the full clinical pattern. Szejko et al., 2022

What is a premonitory urge before a tic?

The word premonitory means occurring before. In tic research, premonitory urges are subjective sensory or motivational experiences that often precede motor or vocal tics. People may feel a localized sensation in the same muscles used by a tic, a more diffuse internal tension, or a sense of incompleteness that resolves temporarily when an action is performed. The experience can be bodily, difficult to name, or described as a need to get a movement or sound exactly right. The European Society for the Study of Tourette Syndrome identifies premonitory sensations, waxing and waning, temporary suppressibility, and variable feelings of voluntariness as useful features in assessment, while emphasizing that the features differ across individuals. ESSTS assessment guideline

A tic itself is a recurrent movement or vocalization. A motor tic might involve blinking, facial movements, neck motions, or shoulder shrugging. A vocal tic might involve throat clearing, sniffing, grunting, or more complex utterances. Premonitory urge is a description of a person's experience around a tic; it is not a separate tic type or an independent clinical diagnosis. Because tic movements and vocalizations may occur without a reported urge, the urge is best understood as a frequent associated feature rather than a defining test. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

The typical urge–tic–relief sequence

One commonly reported pattern is a sensation that builds, followed by a tic and then a momentary reduction in discomfort. For instance, a person may experience pressure around the eyes, blink repeatedly, and feel that the pressure has released; another may feel tightening in the throat, make a sound, and notice that the sensation eases. The relief can be immediate and fleeting. It can also be incomplete, which may prompt repetition until the sensation feels sufficiently resolved. The review literature supports a close moment-to-moment relationship between urges and tics, yet reports that the intensity of urges and the severity of tics are not reliably proportional on standard clinical scales. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

This sequence can be clinically informative, but it must not be treated as a universal law. Some tics are too fast for a person to detect a preceding signal. Some people notice the urge only after deliberately focusing on it. Others report a generalized feeling of arousal or tension rather than an exact location. The same individual may experience strong premonitory sensations with one tic and none that are easily identifiable with another. Szejko et al., 2022

What do premonitory urges feel like?

There is no single physical description. The most useful vocabulary comes from direct reports by people with tic disorders and from instruments developed to capture those reports. Descriptions include pressure behind the eyes, tightness in the neck or shoulders, a scratchy or tickling throat sensation, skin-like itching without an obvious external cause, warmth or an internal energy, a sensation of muscle tension, and an uncomfortable sense of being compelled to move or vocalize. Other people describe a more abstract feeling that something is incomplete or not just right. Woods et al., 2005; Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

The location is sometimes related to the tic. Eye-region discomfort may accompany blinking; a neck sensation may precede a head movement; a throat sensation may precede a vocal tic. Nevertheless, perceived location, movement form, and intensity do not map onto one another perfectly. A tic can change while an underlying urge is described as similar, or a similar tic can carry different sensations across situations. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Physical sensations, mental urges, and 'not just right' experiences

A localized physical sensation is one common presentation, but some people report an urge as a mental or whole-body feeling. Incompleteness and 'not just right' experiences deserve particular care because they also appear in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The 2025 scoping review found that a 'not just right' quality was more common among individuals with co-occurring OCD. This finding reflects overlapping experiences, not diagnostic interchangeability. A clinician examines the entire sequence and its functional meaning rather than classifying a person from a phrase alone. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Examples illustrate the distinctions. 'The muscles in my shoulders tighten until I shrug' is a possible tic-related sensory description. 'I have to arrange the objects again because the setting feels unfinished' may describe a compulsion, although its assessment requires context. 'My body rocks because the movement is regulating or comforting' may be described as stimming or stereotyped behavior. These accounts overlap in superficial appearance but may involve different developmental histories, goals, and learning processes. For a dedicated comparison, see OCD vs. Tourette syndrome and OCD sensory phenomena.

Do all people with tics experience premonitory urges?

No. Many adolescents and adults with Tourette syndrome or persistent tic disorders recognize some form of premonitory sensation, but the proportion depends on age, the way people are asked, the instrument used, and the clinical sample. A reported absence can reflect the genuinely limited experience of an urge, difficulty identifying a sensation, or difficulty communicating it. Estimates obtained from selected specialty-clinic samples should not be assumed to represent every child or adult with tics. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

An especially important distinction is the difference between the existence of a sensation and the ability to describe it. A younger child may be able to say that a movement 'has to happen' while being unable to localize the sensation or recognize it as something occurring before the tic. Even among adults, mild or habitual tics sometimes escape awareness entirely. The ESSTS guideline cautions that subjective awareness and observed tic expression often differ. Szejko et al., 2022

At what age do children become aware of tic urges?

Tics usually begin in childhood. Premonitory urge awareness often becomes more clearly reportable several years after tic onset. The precise timing differs and is affected by language ability, interoceptive awareness, experience with tics, the form of the interview, and possibly the particular urge being assessed. Older studies and the 2025 synthesis identify challenges in measuring urges reliably in younger children; a parent cannot directly observe an internal sensation in the way that they can observe a head movement. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025; Woods et al., 2005

Adults should avoid repeatedly interrogating a child about a feeling they may be unable to identify. A useful clinical question is whether the child notices anything happening inside their body shortly before a familiar tic. A child who answers 'I don't know' can still have a tic disorder. Their history, observed symptoms, functional effect, and differential diagnosis remain the clinical foundation. ESSTS assessment guideline

Why can a tic feel voluntary even when it is unwanted?

The sensory urge helps explain an apparently paradoxical report: 'I chose to move, but I did not choose the urge.' Many people can sense a growing need and consciously allow the tic to occur because doing so is experienced as relieving. The ability to interrupt or delay that response varies across individuals and moments. In this setting, voluntary versus involuntary is an imperfect binary for describing lived experience; the movement may have some momentary controllable component while the recurring urge and neurodevelopmental pattern are unwanted. Szejko et al., 2022

A person who can postpone a tic during a meeting may show more tics later when relaxed or in private, but later tic expression should not automatically be interpreted as a proven rebound caused by suppression. Contextual changes, fatigue, attentional demands, and the natural fluctuation of symptoms may all contribute. Clinical observations and laboratory studies of suppression have not established a simple rule that holding back tics always produces a subsequent excess. The personal cost of sustained effort is important even when the observable tic count is low. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025; ESSTS assessment guideline

What happens when someone tries to suppress a tic?

Some people can temporarily suppress certain tics, particularly in settings that strongly reward suppression or discourage visible symptoms. Suppression may feel like resisting the impulse to blink, cough, or shift after a mounting sensation. Discomfort sometimes increases during the attempt and lessens after the tic, but both suppressibility and urge intensity vary. Their relationship is more complicated than the everyday assumption that stronger urges always mean less control. The 2025 synthesis reports inconsistent correlations between urge measures and tic suppression ability across studies. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Suppressibility is also context-specific. A person might resist one highly recognizable shoulder tic yet struggle to detect a subtle facial tic in time. In some settings, external attention reduces tic expression; in others, attention directed toward the urge may make it more salient. These observations are not permission to demand prolonged suppression at school, at home, or at work. Repeatedly requiring concealment can consume attention and produce distress, regardless of the tic count that other people see. Szejko et al., 2022

Is tic suppression harmful?

Temporary suppression is not, by itself, evidence of neurological harm. It is also not an obligation. Some individuals use short-term management strategies when they personally find them useful; others report exhaustion or distraction. Clinical practice weighs the person's comfort, autonomy, priorities, and functional needs. Behavioral therapy provides structured skills and individualized goals rather than a demand to keep every tic hidden at all times. AAN treatment recommendations

Why do urges occur? What the brain research shows

Premonitory urges involve bodily awareness and action preparation, making sensory processing, interoception, and motor-control circuits plausible areas of investigation. Research has implicated the insula and supplementary motor area in the experience of premonitory urges. The insula participates in representing bodily states and subjective salience; the supplementary motor area is involved in movement preparation and control. These associations help frame testable mechanisms, but they do not establish a single brain region or a single causal path responsible for the urge in every person. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

A tic may be embedded in interactions among cortical, striatal, and other motor-regulatory networks. The experience of urge and relief can arise alongside those processes, but the temporal order reported in an interview does not prove that the urge generated the tic. Some tics may occur without a clearly detected sensation; some urges may persist without an immediate tic; and different treatments can affect observed tic severity and urge ratings differently. This is a key limitation of simplistic explanations such as 'the urge causes the movement' or 'the movement always removes the urge.' Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Does relief reinforce tics?

A learning-theory interpretation proposes that when a tic reduces aversive bodily discomfort, immediate relief can strengthen the tendency to repeat the response in similar circumstances. This is commonly described as negative reinforcement: something unpleasant is reduced after an action. It is a hypothesis for understanding part of tic expression and for designing therapy, not proof that tics are learned by choice or that reinforcement is the sole cause of Tourette syndrome. The underlying tic disorder has a neurodevelopmental basis, and research has not established one uniform causal sequence for every tic. ESSTS psychological interventions guideline; Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Premonitory urges and comprehensive behavioral intervention for tics (CBIT)

CBIT is an evidence-based behavioral treatment for impairing tics. Its components typically include awareness training, practice of a competing response, and functional assessment of contexts that increase or maintain tic burden. Awareness training helps a person identify a tic, its earliest visible sign, or the preceding urge. With a trained clinician, a competing response is selected and practiced in a way that is feasible for that specific tic. The goal is improved control and reduced interference, without assigning blame for symptoms. CDC, 2026; AAN, 2019

For example, a person with a recurrent head movement might learn to identify a specific preceding neck sensation and then practice a therapist-selected response that is physically incompatible with the tic. The exact response must be individualized; a generic online exercise is not a substitute for assessment. A person whose urge is unclear may learn to recognize the start of a tic through other signals. The person's capacity, developmental level, tic type, comorbid conditions, and priorities determine treatment planning. Andrén et al., 2022

In a randomized trial involving 126 children aged 9–17 with impairing Tourette syndrome or chronic tic disorder, an eight-session behavioral program led to greater improvements in tic severity than supportive therapy and education. The primary study supports CBIT for the population and treatment package studied; it does not imply that every premonitory urge will disappear, or that urge intensity necessarily predicts treatment response. The AAN recommends offering CBIT as an initial option when available, taking patient preference and impairment into account. Piacentini et al., 2010; Pringsheim et al., 2019

Habit reversal training and urge awareness

Habit reversal training (HRT) is central to CBIT. Its awareness component helps the patient recognize pre-tic signals, while competing response training focuses on a different, deliberately chosen action. A session may involve describing the earliest recognizable sensation, identifying situations in which the tic is easier or harder to notice, practicing the competing response, and reviewing whether the strategy was useful. As the ESSTS guidelines emphasize, HRT typically addresses particular tics in sequence, often beginning with one that causes significant impairment. Andrén et al., 2022

Is exposure and response prevention the same as CBIT?

Tic-focused exposure and response prevention (ERP) is another structured behavioral approach. It involves learning to tolerate urges while refraining from the tic response during therapeutic exercises. It differs in protocol from HRT/CBIT, and it must also be distinguished from ERP designed for OCD compulsions. ESSTS recommends both HRT/CBIT and tic-focused ERP as first-line behavioral approaches, while noting that the evidence base for HRT/CBIT is larger. Choice of intervention depends on clinical expertise, availability, patient characteristics, and shared decision-making. Andrén et al., 2022

Does successful treatment always reduce the urge?

No such guarantee follows from the evidence. Tic frequency, the distress associated with urges, the ability to delay a tic, and perceived control are related but distinct outcomes. Studies summarized in the 2025 review report that interventions can affect urge and tic measurements differently. A person may learn to respond to a sensation more flexibly without the sensation disappearing; another may notice less discomfort. Good treatment evaluation therefore tracks functioning, quality of life, pain, personal goals, tic severity, and the burden of urges rather than demanding a particular sensory result. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Premonitory urges and medication

Medication may be appropriate for tics that cause significant functional impairment, pain, injury, or substantial distress, particularly when access to effective behavioral care is limited or the person prefers medication after discussing options. There is no medication specifically established as a universal treatment for premonitory urges in isolation. When clinicians consider medication for tics, they weigh efficacy, adverse effects, co-occurring conditions, and ongoing need; tic improvement should not be automatically equated with the disappearance of urge sensations. AAN, 2019; CDC, 2026

Possible harms of tic medications vary by drug class. The AAN guideline addresses monitoring issues such as sedation, cardiovascular effects for particular agents, metabolic effects and movement-related adverse effects for antipsychotics, as well as gradual tapering where appropriate. Medication should be initiated or changed with a qualified clinician and monitored for actual benefits and unwanted effects. The urge literature remains limited on reliably predicting which treatment will relieve which specific sensation. AAN treatment recommendations; Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

How are premonitory urges measured?

The Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS) is a patient-reported instrument designed to capture experiences such as pressure, internal tension, and a need to perform tics. Woods and colleagues introduced it in 2005. The European clinical assessment guideline also discusses more individualized tools, including the Individualized Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (I-PUTS), alongside standardized measures of tic severity and impairment. Woods et al., 2005; Szejko et al., 2022

A 2025 systematic review of measurement properties identified 18 studies across four patient-reported instruments. It found support for PUTS in evaluating premonitory urges while noting that different scales cover different constructs and that some alternatives need further validation. Interpretation is especially challenging in younger children and when instruments include items reflecting not-just-right or incompleteness phenomena also associated with OCD. Questionnaire responses can guide discussion and track change, but a PUTS score cannot confirm or exclude a tic disorder and cannot replace a clinician's developmental and diagnostic evaluation. Systematic measurement review, 2025

Why tic severity scales cannot substitute for urge assessment

The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) evaluates dimensions of observed motor and vocal tics and their interference. PUTS instead addresses a person's internal pre-tic experience. Those measures are complementary, and their scores do not always move together. Clinicians may also ask about discomfort, sleep, attention, school participation, social avoidance, anxiety, and pain. An individual can have relatively infrequent tics with troubling urges, or highly visible tics with little reported sensory distress. Szejko et al., 2022; Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Premonitory urges, OCD, stimming, and other movements

Premonitory sensations are valuable pieces of a clinical history, but no single sensory description decisively separates tics from every other repetitive behavior. OCD compulsions may follow intrusive fears, doubt, rules, or a feeling of incompleteness and can also provide immediate relief. Some compulsions have a strong sensory component rather than a verbalized feared outcome. A tic-related sensory urge is often closely linked to the emergence of a movement or vocalization, but a full assessment considers developmental timing, action form, repetition pattern, function, associated thoughts, and co-occurring syndromes. Szejko et al., 2022

Autistic stimming and motor stereotypies may involve repetitive, sometimes rhythmic or sustained movements experienced as regulating, engaging, or comforting. Some people have both autism and tic disorders, and a single person can display more than one category of repetitive behavior. Other differentials include medication-associated movements, myoclonus, dystonia, seizures, and functional tic-like behaviors. Functional symptoms are genuine experiences and require respectful positive clinical assessment; they cannot be classified as fabrication because they look unusual or because a sensory experience is difficult to explain. ESSTS assessment guideline

For detailed ownership-specific discussion of compulsions, see OCD vs. Tourette syndrome: tics, compulsions and urges. This page concentrates on the experience of pre-tic sensation, not on reproducing the diagnostic criteria of OCD or establishing a second canonical guide to its treatment.

Can stress, attention, sleep, or context affect an urge?

People often describe fluctuations in urge awareness and tic expression across stress, excitement, fatigue, focused activities, and social environments. Context can influence the salience of an internal sensation and the effort required to manage tics. Associations reported by an individual deserve attention as clues to their daily burden, but a trigger for heightened tic expression is different from the underlying cause of a neurodevelopmental tic disorder. The evidence base does not support a simplistic explanation that anxiety, parenting, devices, or willpower created the disorder. ESSTS assessment guideline; AAN, 2019

Attention can work in different directions. Becoming aware of a premonitory urge is useful in a structured behavioral intervention; constant unsupervised monitoring can also be tiring or frustrating for some people. Sleep problems, distress, and social pressure may change how difficult a tic feels without altering its diagnostic classification. Practical care should reduce pain and impairment while preserving flexibility and dignity, including room for spontaneous movement when that is what the person needs. CDC, 2026

Practical strategies for children, adults, families, and schools

A useful first step is to listen to the person's own sensory vocabulary. Asking what happens before a tic, whether it hurts, and how long any relief lasts can provide clinically relevant information. It is reasonable to record broad patterns in a brief symptom diary when the person finds this helpful; prolonged tracking is unnecessary if it increases preoccupation or distress. For a child, caregivers and teachers can focus on comfort, participation, sleep, bullying prevention, and any pain or interference, rather than assuming each tic can be stopped on command. CDC behavioral treatment guide

When the sensation is painful, physically stressful, or interfering with daily life, an experienced clinician can discuss tailored CBIT and other options. If someone is trying to suppress tics for social reasons, support may also include permission to move, flexible breaks, reasonable school or workplace accommodations, or explaining tics to peers with the person's consent. A person who has mild tics and no meaningful impairment may reasonably choose observation rather than active treatment, with follow-up if needs change. The AAN explicitly recognizes watchful waiting for people without tic-related impairment. AAN guideline

Caregivers can use neutral questions such as 'Does anything feel uncomfortable before that movement?' or 'Would a break help?' Questions should be optional, and the person's answer should be accepted. Praise or punishment based on how successfully someone conceals tics is a poor substitute for individualized treatment. Clinical support also assesses co-occurring ADHD, OCD, anxiety, and other difficulties separately because the most impairing problem may not be the tic itself. Szejko et al., 2022; CDC, 2026

When should pre-tic sensations prompt medical evaluation?

Recurrent new movements or sounds warrant clinical discussion when they interfere with learning, work, sleep, social participation, cause injuries, or leave a person uncertain about their cause. Clinicians assess age at onset, tic history, motor and vocal symptom patterns, duration, associated conditions, medications, and the neurological examination when clinically indicated. A history of premonitory urge can support phenotypic understanding, but the diagnosis of provisional tic disorder, persistent motor or vocal tic disorder, or Tourette syndrome depends on criteria covering symptoms and course, including typical childhood onset and medical exclusions. CDC diagnostic guidance, 2026

Sudden changes accompanied by loss of awareness, unusual episodes suggestive of seizures, new focal neurological symptoms, or signs of serious medication reactions require appropriately prompt medical assessment. A new and complex onset in adolescence or adulthood may also call for a broader differential, including functional tic-like symptoms and other movement disorders. Clinicians decide whether investigations such as EEG or neuroimaging are indicated by the broader presentation; routine testing is generally unnecessary for a typical tic disorder. Szejko et al., 2022

What the research establishes—and what remains uncertain

Well-supported findings are that premonitory urges are common in tic-disorder populations, often cause discomfort, may precede both motor and vocal tics, and are clinically useful to assess; that awareness varies with age and individual experience; and that evidence-based behavioral treatment can reduce tics for many patients. Structured assessment and tailored care have stronger support than interpretations based on one sensation. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025; AAN, 2019

Important open questions concern how the sensation emerges in neural systems, whether every tic is preceded by an unnoticed urge, which characteristics predict long-term outcome, and how much urge intensity changes independently of tic severity during treatment. Studies use heterogeneous samples, different measurement methods, and cross-sectional designs; some associations differ between studies. The strongest available syntheses make these limits clear, so an urge should be understood as a rich component of tic phenomenology rather than an all-purpose causal explanation or diagnostic shortcut. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025; Systematic measurement review, 2025

Frequently asked questions

Does a premonitory urge always come immediately before a tic?

Often it is perceived shortly before the action, but the interval and clarity vary, and some people notice no distinct signal. A familiar tic can arise without a consciously identified urge. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Can the sensation be an itch, pressure, or tingling?

Yes. People use bodily descriptions such as itching, tension, pressure, or inner energy, but a persistent itch or other new physical sensation may also have a dermatological, neurological, or other medical explanation. Context and examination matter. Woods et al., 2005; Szejko et al., 2022

Does feeling relief after a tic prove Tourette syndrome?

No. Relief is compatible with premonitory urges, but many other repetitive behaviors also change discomfort. Tourette syndrome requires a particular developmental and motor/vocal tic history, symptom duration, and exclusion of other causes. CDC diagnosis, 2026

Can a child have tics without knowing what an urge feels like?

Yes. The development of conscious urge awareness commonly follows the onset of visible tics. Young children may lack the language or insight to report sensory antecedents reliably. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Does trying to hold back a tic make it worse later?

A predictable rebound after every attempt at suppression has not been established. Individual discomfort during suppression and later tic fluctuation are real concerns, and they should be understood in context rather than treated as a universal law. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Do stronger premonitory urges mean more severe tics?

Not reliably. A person's urge burden and tic severity are separate dimensions, and research finds inconsistent associations between their scale scores. Both may deserve assessment. Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Can CBIT help if I do not recognize a premonitory urge?

It may still be possible to develop awareness of the earliest recognizable tic signal and work with a trained therapist. Poor awareness can affect how a standard protocol is adapted, particularly for young children, and treatment decisions should be individualized. AAN recommendations; ESSTS psychological interventions guideline

Is a premonitory urge the same as an obsession or compulsion?

No single sensation determines the distinction. Tic urges commonly involve a sensory pressure toward movement or sound; compulsions often relate to fears, rules, or completion, while sensory-driven OCD can overlap. Some people have both conditions. ESSTS assessment guideline

Can premonitory urges be treated with medication?

Treatment decisions generally target impairing tics and associated difficulties. Research has not established one medication that universally eliminates premonitory urges, and effects on tic and urge ratings can differ. AAN recommendations; Wohlgemuth et al., 2025

Is PUTS a diagnostic test for Tourette syndrome?

No. PUTS measures reported premonitory sensory experiences. A clinician diagnoses tic disorders through history and appropriate clinical evaluation, not a PUTS cutoff. Systematic measurement review, 2025; CDC diagnosis

References

Andrén, P., Jakubovski, E., Murphy, T. L., et al. (2022). European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders—version 2.0. Part II: psychological interventions. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01845-z

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Behavioral treatment for tics that works. CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Diagnosing tic disorders. CDC

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Treatment of Tourette syndrome. CDC

Piacentini, J., Woods, D. W., Scahill, L., et al. (2010). Behavior therapy for children with Tourette disorder: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 303(19), 1929–1937. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.607

Pringsheim, T., Okun, M. S., Müller-Vahl, K., et al. (2019). Practice guideline recommendations summary: Treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology, 92(19), 896–906. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007466

Szejko, N., Robinson, S., Hartmann, A., et al. (2022). European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders—version 2.0. Part I: assessment. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01842-2

Wohlgemuth, J. B., Watson, K. H., Gill, K. D., & Isaacs, D. A. (2025). Premonitory urge in tic disorders—a scoping review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1504442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1504442

Woods, D. W., Piacentini, J., Himle, M. B., & Chang, S. (2005). Premonitory Urge for Tics Scale (PUTS): Initial psychometric results and examination of the premonitory urge phenomenon in youths with tic disorders. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 26(6), 397–403. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16344654/

Zhao, Z., Cai, Q., Liu, P., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y., & Hu, S. (2025). Evaluation of the measurement properties of premonitory urge patient-reported outcome measure: A systematic literature review. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 184, 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.027

 
 
bottom of page