Tea and Nostalgia: Aroma, Memory, Family Rituals, and Learned Meaning
Updated: Sep 29
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Tea nostalgia is the experience of a cup, aroma, preparation, place, or tea-related object making the past feel psychologically present. A familiar steam rising from black tea, the smell of jasmine, the sweetness of tea with honey, the clink of a spoon in a particular cup, or the sequence of a family tea routine can become a cue for autobiographical memory. The tea does not contain the memory. The memory is carried by a learned relationship between sensory cues and a person’s history.
That distinction explains why one tea can feel intensely nostalgic to one person and emotionally neutral to another. Tea nostalgia depends on what was repeatedly paired with the beverage: people, rooms, seasons, languages, migration, school breaks, illness and recovery, celebrations, ordinary evenings, visits to grandparents, travel, hospitality, grief, or a daily moment of quiet. The same chemical aroma can therefore enter very different personal stories.
Smell matters because tea releases volatile compounds that create its aroma, and odor cues have an unusually well-studied relationship with autobiographical memory. Yet tea nostalgia is broader than smell. Flavor integrates olfaction, taste, temperature, texture, and other sensory information, while cups, teapots, labels, places, and social routines add visual, tactile, conceptual, and interpersonal cues. For the sensory chemistry and psychology of scent itself, see Tea Aroma: How Smell Changes Taste, Memory, and Expectation.
What Is Tea Nostalgia?
Nostalgia is commonly defined in contemporary psychology as a sentimental longing for one’s past. Tea nostalgia is a beverage-specific form of that broader process: tea becomes an autobiographical cue and a symbol through which earlier people, places, identities, routines, and periods of life are recalled. The nostalgic object may be a true tea made from Camellia sinensis, an herbal infusion, masala chai, mint tea, rooibos, or another culturally specific preparation. What matters psychologically is the learned autobiographical meaning, not whether the beverage belongs to one botanical category.
Nostalgia is especially social in much of the experimental literature. Juhl and Biskas’s 2023 review summarizes evidence that nostalgic reflection often contains close others and can increase perceived social connectedness. That does not mean every nostalgic tea memory is social or positive. It means that family, friendship, hospitality, and belonging are common mechanisms through which a beverage can acquire nostalgic significance.
Tea nostalgia should also be separated from four neighboring experiences. Familiarity means that a tea is known or repeatedly encountered. Habit means that drinking is cued by a recurring context. Comfort is a present feeling of ease, warmth, predictability, or relief. Tradition refers to a transmitted social or cultural practice. Nostalgia can draw on all four, but it specifically points backward: the present tea activates a meaningful relationship with the past.
Why Tea Can Become a Powerful Memory Cue
A tea episode is unusually cue-rich. It may combine a stable aroma, a characteristic flavor, heat in the hands, a familiar vessel, a kettle sound, a preparation sequence, a time of day, a seat at a table, a particular person, and repeated conversation patterns. When these elements recur together, they can form a dense network of associations. Later, only part of that network may be needed to reactivate the broader memory.
This does not require the memory to have been consciously memorized. Autobiographical memory is often reconstructed from cues in the present. A smell or gesture may first produce a vague sense of familiarity or emotional tone, followed by a more specific recollection. At other times, the person recognizes only that a tea feels like “home” without retrieving a single episode. Nostalgia can therefore involve both specific events and more generalized periods of life.
Aroma provides a distinctive olfactory cue
Tea aroma comes from volatile organic compounds released from dry leaf and infusion. Reviews of tea chemistry describe hundreds of volatile compounds and show that cultivar, growing environment, processing, storage, and scenting can change a tea’s aromatic profile. A recent review of tea VOCs and an earlier review of tea volatiles both support the basic point that aroma is a chemically real and highly variable sensory property. See Zeng and colleagues’ review and Zheng and colleagues’ review.
That physical aroma becomes autobiographically meaningful through learning. A bergamot note is not intrinsically “grandmother,” jasmine is not intrinsically “summer,” and cardamom is not intrinsically “family.” These meanings emerge because a sensory pattern repeatedly co-occurs with particular people, settings, narratives, and emotions. The chemistry supplies a recognizable cue; personal and cultural experience supplies its remembered significance.
Flavor adds taste, temperature, and mouthfeel
What people casually call the “taste” of tea is a multisensory flavor experience. Marks and colleagues describe flavor as an integration of gustation, olfaction, and somatosensory information, with temperature and texture contributing alongside taste and smell. That matters for nostalgia because the remembered cue may be the whole configuration: very hot sweet tea, milky black tea, cool mint infusion, a drying strong brew, or a specific combination of aroma and mouthfeel rather than a single molecule.
For a broader account of how tea flavor is built and learned, see What Does Tea Taste Like? Flavor, Aroma, Astringency, Body, and Learning.
Objects and settings can become memory cues too
The cup, teapot, tray, tablecloth, kettle, room, window light, weather, and preparation sounds can all become part of the remembered scene. A vessel can matter because it is repeated in the same episodes, not because the material itself carries an emotional property. This is one reason replacing an old family cup can feel surprisingly consequential: the object has become part of the cue system around the drink. For the practical and ritual role of the brewing vessel, see Teapot: Types, Materials, Brewing, Heat, and the Psychology of Ritual.
The Proust Effect: Why Smell Can Make the Past Feel Present
The expression “Proust effect” refers to autobiographical memories triggered by sensory cues, especially odors. The name comes from Marcel Proust’s literary episode in which the taste and aroma of a madeleine dipped in tea suddenly open a rich field of childhood memory. Psychology adopted the literary example because it captures a recognizable phenomenon: a cue encountered now can produce a striking sense of mental travel into one’s past.
The evidence is substantial enough to take odor-evoked autobiographical memory seriously, while the strongest popular claims still need qualification. Hackländer, Janssen, and Bermeitinger’s in-depth review concluded that odor-evoked autobiographical memories show distinctive patterns, but also emphasized methodological variation and the need to explain the phenomenon rather than repeat a simple slogan about smell being uniquely powerful.
In a classic experiment with older adults, Willander and Larsson found that memories cued by odors were, on average, older than memories cued by words or pictures and were associated with a stronger feeling of being brought back in time. In another experiment, de Bruijn and Bender found that childhood-related odors triggered richer autobiographical recollections than childhood-related images under their laboratory conditions.
These findings do not justify the blanket claim that smell always produces older, more vivid, or more emotional memories. Bogenschütz and colleagues reported that when people described memories associated with sensory modalities without an odor physically present at retrieval, odor-associated memories were not necessarily older or more emotional. Their results suggest that the current retrieval situation itself can contribute to the special phenomenology often attributed to odor memory.
For tea, the safest conclusion is therefore precise: a tea aroma can act as an effective autobiographical retrieval cue when that aroma has been associated with meaningful past experience. General odor-memory research makes that mechanism plausible and well supported. Evidence that every familiar tea aroma has a special or superior memory effect is not established.
What Research Specifically Says About Tea-Cued Autobiographical Memory
Direct research that explicitly includes tea is much smaller than the general literature on odor, flavor, food, and nostalgia. That matters for evidence grading: general olfactory-memory findings can explain a plausible mechanism, but they should not be relabeled as a tea-specific effect. A small Japanese research line offers more direct evidence while still grouping tea with other culturally valued consumables.
In a 2018 study, Yamamoto, Yokomitsu, and Hirai asked 408 participants to record involuntary autobiographical memories triggered in everyday life while consuming “shikohin,” a category that included tea, coffee, alcohol, and tobacco. The researchers collected 382 memories; many were described as vivid, emotional, positive, and important, and qualitative categories included nostalgia, changes in emotion, linked memories, communication, coping, and behavior. Because the consumables were analyzed within a broader category, the study supports the reality of beverage-cued autobiographical memory but does not establish that tea is uniquely powerful.
A 2019 study by Yamamoto and Yokomitsu developed the Functions of the Autobiographical Memory in Shikohin inventory. Across two studies, participants recalled memories cued by coffee, tea, alcohol, or tobacco; the resulting measure included nostalgia, positive emotion, coping, and direction-of-action factors. This is useful direct evidence that tea can participate in the same autobiographical-memory system described by the broader literature. It remains measurement and recall research, not evidence that drinking tea produces a universal emotional benefit or a clinical effect.
Why Childhood and Family Tea Memories Can Feel So Strong
Childhood can be especially important because early family environments are where many recurring food and drink cues are first learned. A child may not care about the varietal name, oxidation level, brewing ratio, or provenance of a tea. What may be learned instead is a stable scene: the smell in a kitchen, the adult who prepares it, the cup reserved for visits, the sweetness level, a language spoken at the table, or the predictable moment when everyone gathers.
Years later, the adult can encounter one element of that scene and recover more of the network. This helps explain why an inexpensive everyday tea can carry more nostalgic force than a technically superior tea purchased later. Sensory quality and autobiographical importance answer different questions. One concerns the properties and evaluation of the beverage; the other concerns its place in a life.
Research on family routines and rituals helps clarify the social side of this process. Fiese and colleagues’ review of 50 years of family-routine and ritual research distinguishes routines as observable repeated practices from rituals as events with symbolic and collective meaning. The review also stresses that family routines and rituals are shaped by cultural environment and that the evidence base contains methodological limitations. A repeated cup of tea can therefore remain an ordinary routine, or it can become a family ritual when the family gives the practice symbolic significance.
Family Rituals Give Tea More Than Repetition
Repetition makes cues stable; ritual adds meaning. A family may prepare tea after dinner every day simply because it is convenient. Another family may use the same act to mark return, welcome guests, pass down stories, celebrate a holiday, pause an argument, or create a protected time for conversation. The sensory sequence can be similar while the symbolic function differs.
Ritual also gives memory a structure. Boiling water, opening a tin, warming a pot, arranging glasses, adding milk or herbs, waiting for steeping, serving elders or guests, and sitting in familiar positions can create an ordered sequence. When a later situation recreates part of the sequence, it can cue not only the beverage but the roles, expectations, and relationships that once surrounded it.
Cultural accuracy matters here. There is no single universal “tea ritual.” British afternoon tea, Japanese chanoyu, Chinese gongfu practices, South Asian masala chai routines, North African mint-tea hospitality, Central Asian tea customs, family samovar traditions, and countless household practices have different histories, materials, norms, and meanings. Psychological mechanisms such as learning, attention, and memory can operate across settings without turning those settings into one interchangeable culture.
For one documented cultural form, see Japanese Tea Ceremony: Matcha, Ritual, Attention, and Social Meaning. It should be understood on its own historical and cultural terms rather than used as a template for all tea practices.
Learned Meaning: How a Cup Acquires Personal Significance
A tea becomes nostalgic through accumulated association. Repeated pairings connect sensory information with context: a smoky note with winter evenings, a lemon slice with a parent’s care, a glass holder with train travel, a thermos with school excursions, or a certain blend with late-night conversations. These associations can be explicit, but many are learned without deliberate reflection.
The meaning can also be semantic. Names, stories, origin claims, family narratives, brands, and inherited descriptions influence how a tea is categorized and remembered. If a family repeatedly calls one preparation “grandfather’s tea,” the phrase itself becomes a retrieval cue. If a person knows a tea was brought from a hometown, provenance can become part of the nostalgic meaning even when the sensory difference is modest.
This is why nostalgia is learned rather than a fixed property of flavor. A new tea may resemble an old one chemically yet fail to evoke the same past because the package, vessel, social setting, or expectation differs. Conversely, a reformulated or imperfect version can still evoke nostalgia because enough of the cue network remains intact. Memory is reconstructive; it does not require exact sensory duplication.
Tea Nostalgia, Comfort, and Social Connectedness
Food and scent research provides a useful evidence base for understanding why a nostalgic tea may feel comforting. Green and colleagues’ 2023 review of the Proust effect describes how scent- and food-evoked nostalgia is linked with autobiographical relevance, familiarity, positive affect, social connectedness, and meaning. This literature concerns scents and foods broadly; it should not be treated as proof that tea has a unique therapeutic property.
A newer set of studies examined food nostalgia and comfort more directly. Reid and colleagues found that nostalgic food experiences were associated with greater comfort in observational studies, and their preregistered experiments supported a pathway in which food nostalgia increased comfort through social connectedness. Tea is a beverage rather than the tested food set, so the result is mechanistically relevant rather than tea-specific proof.
Nostalgia can also connect past and present identity. In six experiments, Sedikides and colleagues found that experimentally induced nostalgia increased self-continuity in part through social connectedness. A family tea may therefore feel psychologically important because it links the present drinker to earlier versions of the self and to relationships that helped define that period.
None of this turns tea into treatment. A nostalgic drink may be comforting, socially meaningful, or emotionally regulating for some people in some contexts. Evidence about nostalgia does not establish that tea treats depression, anxiety disorders, trauma, complicated grief, insomnia, dementia, or another clinical condition. The personal reality of comfort can be acknowledged without converting it into a medical claim.
A simple everyday example is Tea with Honey: Sweetness, Aroma, Comfort, and Expectations, where sweetness, aroma, learned care associations, and expectation can all contribute to the experience while remaining distinct from medical effects.
Why the Same Tea Can Mean Different Things to Different People
Autobiographical cues are personal. One person can smell strong black tea and recall safety at a grandparent’s table. Another can recall exam stress. A third may have no memory at all. Someone who migrated may experience a familiar tea as continuity with a place left behind; someone else may associate the same beverage with social pressure, illness, conflict, or loss.
Even within one family, meanings can diverge. A shared tea ritual may represent belonging to one person and obligation to another. Younger and older relatives can remember different periods of the same practice. A family may preserve the recipe while changing the social function. Nostalgia therefore belongs to the relationship between cue and biography, not to a demographic group or a tea category.
Anthropological work on food and memory supports a broader cultural reading. Holtzman’s review describes food as an important site for memory, identity, social change, and nostalgia across diverse contexts. The implication for tea is not that cultures share one psychology of tea, but that beverages can participate in historically specific systems of identity and remembrance.
Aroma Is Important, but It Is Not the Whole Memory
Popular explanations often reduce the Proust effect to smell. That misses the architecture of tea experience. Aroma can be a highly effective cue, but a nostalgic cup can also depend on sweetness, bitterness, temperature, mouthfeel, color, vessel weight, serving gesture, language, packaging, table setting, and the presence of particular people.
These cue types can reinforce one another. The aroma of a childhood tea may be only moderately similar to the remembered tea, but the old cup and the same serving gesture can make the scene feel exact. Or the aroma can be nearly identical while a different context leaves the experience emotionally flat. Nostalgia therefore emerges from cue configuration rather than from a single sensory channel in isolation.
Expectation can also shape the present experience. Knowing that a tea came from a childhood home, was made from a relative’s recipe, or uses a familiar brand can alter attention and interpretation. That influence does not make the experience false. It shows that perception and memory are context-sensitive. Physical properties of the beverage and subjective meaning can both be real while operating at different explanatory levels.
Tea, Home, Migration, and the Memory of Place
Tea nostalgia often becomes place nostalgia because beverages travel with people. A preparation can preserve a sensory connection to a kitchen, neighborhood, city, language community, or country long after the person has moved. Ingredients, water, utensils, and local availability may change, yet the act of making tea can still function as a small reconstruction of place.
This is one reason diaspora and migration contexts deserve precision. A familiar tea can support continuity, but it can also intensify homesickness. The same aroma may produce warmth on one day and grief on another. Cultural food-memory scholarship repeatedly shows that identity, social change, and memory interact; the emotional direction cannot be inferred from the beverage alone.
Can You Create New Nostalgic Tea Memories?
You cannot command future nostalgia, but you can create stable conditions from which autobiographical associations may develop. Memory cues become useful through repeated meaningful experience. A tea that is consistently connected with a person, season, place, or deliberate pause can later become a marker of that period. Whether it becomes nostalgic depends on what the period comes to mean and how the cue is encountered later.
If the goal is to preserve a period of life rather than chase a psychological effect, simple consistency helps. Use the same or similar tea for a recurring occasion. Keep one distinctive vessel. Notice the aroma before adding other ingredients. Let the ritual belong to a real relationship or activity instead of staging it only for memory. Record the recipe and the story around it. Over time, these details create multiple retrieval routes.
There is no evidence-based formula such as “repeat a tea ritual for 21 days and it becomes nostalgic.” Human associative learning, autobiographical memory, and family meaning do not follow that kind of fixed timetable. The practical principle is continuity of cue and significance, not a numerical threshold.
When Tea Nostalgia Is Pleasant, Bittersweet, or Painful
Nostalgia is often positive-dominant in research, but it is not emotional sugar. It can contain loss inside the pleasure of remembering. A cup associated with someone who has died can feel comforting and painful at the same time. A tea connected to a former home can produce belonging and homesickness. A family ritual can recall intimacy alongside conflict.
This variability is consistent with the broader memory literature. The 2022 study by Bogenschütz and colleagues is particularly useful because it challenges the idea that memories connected with odors are inherently more emotional. The emotional quality depends on the memory, the person, and the retrieval conditions.
If a tea cue is linked with an unwanted memory, changing the tea, vessel, room, or time of day can weaken the immediate cue match and create a different routine. When sensory cues repeatedly provoke severe distress, flashbacks, panic, or major impairment, the issue is no longer simply “tea nostalgia”; it is appropriate to discuss the underlying symptoms with a qualified mental-health professional. The drink itself is neither the diagnosis nor the treatment.
Tea Nostalgia vs Familiarity, Habit, Comfort, and Tradition
Tea nostalgia vs familiarity
Familiarity is recognition or a sense of knownness. You can find a supermarket tea familiar because you drink it every week without feeling nostalgic. Nostalgia adds a personally meaningful orientation toward the past.
Tea nostalgia vs habit
A habit is a learned tendency for a behavior to recur in a stable context. You may automatically make tea at 3 p.m. Nostalgia appears when the cue or behavior evokes sentimental autobiographical meaning, not simply because the action is automatic.
Tea nostalgia vs comfort
Comfort is a present state or appraisal. It can come from warmth, sweetness, predictability, a pause, hydration, social support, or memory. Nostalgia is one possible route to comfort, but a comfortable cup need not recall the past.
Tea nostalgia vs ritual
Ritual is patterned action endowed with meaning. A ritual can become nostalgic when it links current practice with earlier relationships or periods of life. It can also be fully present-focused, spiritual, aesthetic, social, or practical without nostalgia.
Tea nostalgia vs cultural tradition
Tradition exists at a social level and may be transmitted across generations. Personal nostalgia concerns one person’s remembered past. They can overlap when an inherited tea practice is also part of someone’s autobiography, but neither concept should be substituted for the other.
How to Explore Your Own Tea Memories
A useful way to examine tea nostalgia is to separate the cue from the story. This prevents a vague feeling of “this tea is nostalgic” from hiding what is actually doing the work.
1. Identify the sensory cue. Is the strongest trigger the dry-leaf aroma, steam, sweetness, milk, spice, bitterness, smoke, temperature, cup, kettle sound, or something else?
2. Identify the autobiographical scene. Who was there? Where were you? What age or life period does the tea seem to belong to? Is the memory a single episode or a repeated pattern?
3. Identify the social meaning. Was tea a sign of welcome, care, permission to rest, conversation, celebration, routine, duty, status, or belonging?
4. Separate memory from current taste. You may love a tea because of its present flavor, because of its past meaning, or both. Nostalgia can make a technically ordinary beverage subjectively precious.
5. Notice what has changed. The remembered cup may be sweeter, hotter, stronger, or more aromatic than the current one. That mismatch is informative. Autobiographical memory reconstructs experience rather than replaying a sensory recording.
6. Preserve stories, not myths. If a family recipe matters, record who made it, how it changed, and what people remember differently. Variation is part of family memory; forcing one definitive story can erase the very history that made the ritual meaningful.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does tea make me nostalgic?
Tea can make you nostalgic when its aroma, flavor, warmth, vessel, preparation, or social setting has been associated with meaningful earlier experiences. Encountering the cue again can reactivate autobiographical memories and the emotions attached to them.
Why can the smell of tea remind me of childhood?
Odors are effective autobiographical cues, and several experiments have found that odor-cued memories can reach further back into childhood and create a stronger feeling of being transported in time than word or picture cues. The pattern is not universal, and retrieval method matters, but a childhood tea aroma can plausibly function as a strong cue when it was repeatedly present in early life.
Is smell more powerful than taste for memory?
There is good evidence that odors can produce distinctive autobiographical-memory experiences, but “more powerful” is too broad. Tea flavor integrates smell, taste, temperature, texture, and context. A nostalgic memory may depend on the combined pattern rather than on smell alone.
What is the Proust effect?
The Proust effect is the phenomenon in which a sensory cue, especially an odor, evokes a vivid autobiographical memory and a sense of being brought back to an earlier time. The name comes from Proust’s literary scene involving a madeleine dipped in tea.
Why does tea remind me of home or family?
Home and family are often repeated contexts for eating and drinking. If tea regularly accompanied care, conversation, visits, celebrations, or quiet routines, the drink can become a compact cue for the larger social environment. Nostalgia research also finds that remembered social relationships are central to many nostalgic experiences.
Is tea nostalgia always positive?
No. It can be warm, bittersweet, neutral, or painful. A tea can recall belonging, but it can also cue homesickness, bereavement, conflict, illness, or another difficult period. The emotional response depends on the autobiographical history attached to the cue.
Can tea nostalgia improve mental health?
Research on nostalgia links some nostalgic experiences with social connectedness, self-continuity, positive affect, and comfort. Those findings do not establish nostalgic tea as a treatment for a mental-health condition. A comforting memory and a clinical intervention are different categories of evidence.
Can a new tea ritual become nostalgic later?
Yes, plausibly. Repeated meaningful experiences can create new associations between a tea and a period of life. Whether the ritual later feels nostalgic depends on the significance of that period and how the cues are encountered in the future; there is no fixed number of repetitions that guarantees the effect.
Can herbal tea, chai, or another infusion trigger nostalgia too?
Yes. Nostalgia depends on autobiographical association, not botanical classification. Chamomile, rooibos, mint tea, masala chai, or another infusion can become a memory cue if it was part of personally meaningful experiences.
Related Articles
References
Bogenschütz, L., Bermeitinger, C., Brörken, A., Schlüter, H., & Hackländer, R. P. (2022). Odor associated memories are not necessarily highly emotional. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103767
de Bruijn, M. J., & Bender, M. (2018). Olfactory cues are more effective than visual cues in experimentally triggering autobiographical memories. Memory, 26(4), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1381744
Fiese, B. H., Tomcho, T. J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 381–390. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12561283/
Green, J. D., Reid, C. A., Kneuer, M. A., & Hedgebeth, M. V. (2023). The Proust effect: Scents, food, and nostalgia. Current Opinion in Psychology, 50, 101562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101562
Hackländer, R. P. M., Janssen, S. M. J., & Bermeitinger, C. (2019). An in-depth review of the methods, findings, and theories associated with odor-evoked autobiographical memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1545-3
Holtzman, J. D. (2006). Food and memory. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123220
Juhl, J., & Biskas, M. (2023). Nostalgia: An impactful social emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, 101545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101545
Marks, L. E., Elgart, B. Z., Burger, K., & Chakwin, E. M. (2007). Human flavor perception: Application of information integration theory. Teorie & Modelli, 1(2), 121–132. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2600858/
Reid, C. A., Green, J. D., Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., McSween, D. K., & Buchmaier, S. (2026). Food nostalgia and food comfort: The role of social connectedness. Cognition and Emotion, 40(1), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2479170
Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Cheung, W.-Y., Routledge, C., Hepper, E. G., Arndt, J., Vail, K., Zhou, X., Brackstone, K., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2016). Nostalgia fosters self-continuity: Uncovering the mechanism (social connectedness) and consequence (eudaimonic well-being). Emotion, 16(4), 524–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000136
Willander, J., & Larsson, M. (2006). Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193837
Yamamoto, K., Yokomitsu, K., & Hirai, H. (2018). The characteristics and functions of involuntary autobiographical memory cued by consuming “shikohin.” The Japanese Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.5265/jcogpsy.15.39
Yamamoto, K., & Yokomitsu, K. (2019). Development of the Functions of the Autobiographical Memory in Shikohin Inventory. The Japanese Journal of Personality, 28(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.28.1.9
Zeng, Q., Wang, H., Tuo, J., Ding, Y., Cao, H., & Yue, C. (2025). Volatile organic compounds in teas: Identification, extraction, analysis, and application of tea aroma. Foods, 14(15), 2574. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12346385/