Sugar and Nostalgia: Why Sweet Foods Can Trigger Powerful Memories
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
A bite of a childhood cake, the aroma of warm cinnamon sugar, the texture of a particular candy, or the flavor of a family dessert can seem to collapse decades into seconds. The experience is familiar enough to have a literary name—the Proust effect—but current psychology gives it a more precise explanation. Sweet foods can become unusually powerful autobiographical memory cues because they combine taste, retronasal smell, texture, temperature, visual appearance, context, repetition, reward, and social meaning in one sensory event. When a similar cue appears later, it can reactivate part of the network in which the earlier experience was encoded.
The key point is that sugar is usually not acting as a unique memory chemical. Research on food-evoked nostalgia shows that foods can elicit nostalgia that is autobiographically relevant, familiar, emotionally arousing, and predominantly positive. Research on the Proust effect emphasizes the potency of smell- and taste-linked autobiographical memories. In real sweet foods, however, “taste” is a multisensory construction: aroma, texture, temperature, vision, and expectations all contribute to what the food becomes in memory.
This is therefore a different question from whether consuming sugar changes memory performance in laboratory tasks or over long periods. That separate evidence belongs to Sugar and Memory: What Human Research Shows. Here the focus is autobiographical remembering: why a sweet food can retrieve a scene, person, place, ritual, or period of life.
Quick answer: why can sweet foods trigger powerful memories?
Sweet foods can trigger powerful memories when their sensory features match cues that were repeatedly paired with meaningful experiences in the past. A familiar flavor can reactivate an associative network that includes a kitchen, a person, a holiday, a school canteen, a birthday, a city, a season, a brand, or a family routine. The resulting memory may feel sudden because the cue is encountered before a deliberate attempt to remember anything.
Three mechanisms work together. First, flavor is multisensory. A classic review of multisensory flavor perception describes flavor as an integration of cues from multiple senses. Second, sensory cues—especially odors—can evoke autobiographical memories with distinctive emotional qualities. Third, nostalgia is strongly social: reviews of nostalgia as a social emotion show that nostalgic reflection often centers on close relationships and can increase feelings of social connectedness.
Sweetness can matter because it is salient, liked by many people, especially during childhood, and often embedded in repeated rituals. Yet the nostalgic object is usually the whole learned configuration: “grandmother’s apple pie,” not sucrose in isolation; “the orange wrapper from the corner shop,” not sweetness in the abstract; “birthday cake after candles,” not carbohydrate chemistry.
What “sugar nostalgia” actually means
“Sugar nostalgia” is a useful search phrase, but it is not a clinical diagnosis or a formal neuroscientific category. It describes nostalgia in which sugar-containing or sweet-tasting foods are prominent memory cues. The scientific literature more commonly studies food-evoked nostalgia, odor-evoked autobiographical memory, taste and memory, comfort food, multisensory flavor, or nostalgia in consumer behavior.
That distinction matters because a cookie, milkshake, candy bar, pudding, jam, sweet tea, holiday pastry, or birthday cake is not a stimulus made of “sugar” alone. Its remembered identity includes aroma compounds, texture, fat, acidity, temperature, color, shape, packaging, place, people, and expectations. Two foods with the same grams of sugar can therefore have completely different autobiographical power.
The sensory side of that distinction is developed elsewhere in the Hub: Sugar and Smell: How Aroma Changes Perceived Sweetness explains how aroma contributes to sweetness experience, Sugar and Texture: Why Mouthfeel Changes Sweetness and Liking covers mouthfeel, and Sweetness Perception: Why the Same Sugar Can Taste Different examines why sweetness is not a fixed property of concentration alone.
Is the memory triggered by sugar, sweetness, or the whole food?
Usually, the whole food is the best level of explanation. Sugar can contribute sweetness and energy, and sweetness can help make an experience noticeable or pleasurable. But the cue that retrieves a memory may be an odor, a texture, a brand name, a package color, a temperature, a recipe-specific spice mixture, or the sequence of a ritual.
Consider cinnamon rolls. The tongue detects sweetness, but much of what people call the “taste” of cinnamon arrives through retronasal olfaction. The soft pull of the dough, warm temperature, icing texture, visual spiral, bakery smell, morning context, and perhaps a parent or grandparent are all available for association. Years later, one component can be enough to reactivate the larger pattern.
This is why “more sugar” does not imply “more nostalgia.” The multisensory flavor literature argues against reducing food experience to one sensory channel. Nostalgia is also person-specific. The same candy can be emotionally dense for one person and meaningless for another because the associative histories differ.
The Proust effect: why smell and taste can feel like time travel
The Proust effect refers to the striking autobiographical memories that can be evoked by sensory cues, especially smell and taste. A 2023 review of scents, food, and nostalgia concluded that taste- and smell-triggered nostalgic memories are often highly self-relevant, familiar, arousing, and emotionally positive. A major methodological review of odor-evoked autobiographical memory likewise found stable phenomenological differences between odor-cued memories and memories cued in other ways, while emphasizing that the field still needs stronger causal explanations.
Odor does not necessarily make memory more accurate
One reason odor memories feel special is emotional intensity rather than superior factual accuracy. In cross-modal experiments, Rachel Herz found that odors were not better than other cue types at producing accurate recall, but the odor-evoked memories were more emotional. In a later naturalistic study, odor-triggered autobiographical memories were again more emotional and evocative than memories triggered by visual or auditory versions of the same cues.
This is an important correction to the common claim that the nose contains a uniquely accurate archive of the past. A smell can make a memory feel immediate, embodied, and emotionally convincing. That subjective force and factual precision are separate properties.
Odor cues can reach unusually early periods of life
In a study of older adults, Willander and Larsson found that odor-cued autobiographical memories tended to be older than memories cued by words or pictures, with many odor-cued memories coming from the first decade of life. Participants also reported a stronger feeling of being brought back in time.
That result helps explain why childhood sweets can be disproportionately powerful later in life. A familiar candy or baked-food aroma may resemble a cue that was encoded when routines, family relationships, and sensory environments were very different from the present. The contrast itself can intensify the feeling of temporal distance.
Why childhood sweets become strong nostalgia objects
Childhood creates unusually dense conditions for learned food meaning. Meals are organized by adults, foods are tied to routines, celebrations are recurrent, brands can remain stable for years, and access to particular sweets may be restricted to special occasions. At the same time, sweet liking has a developmental component.
A review of the development of sweet taste describes a biological preference for sweetness that is especially pronounced in childhood and changes with development, while also emphasizing learning and experience. That does not mean every child likes the same foods or that childhood sweetness determines adult behavior. It means sweetness often enters memory at a developmental stage when food preferences, family rules, and social rituals are being learned together.
The Hub’s dedicated article Why Do Children Like Sweet Foods? Development, Biology, and Learning separates developmental sweet preference from the family and learning processes that shape specific food choices. Those processes help explain why one person remembers homemade jam, another remembers cereal, another remembers sweetened tea, and another remembers a particular candy sold near school.
Repetition makes cues familiar
A food eaten every Sunday, every school break, or every holiday can acquire a stable place in an autobiographical script. Repetition does not guarantee nostalgia, but it increases opportunities for the same sensory configuration to become associated with people, places, and routines. Familiarity then gives a later cue a larger network to reactivate.
Scarcity and special occasions can magnify meaning
A sweet that appeared only on birthdays or holidays may have carried more informational value than an everyday food. It predicted a distinctive event: guests arriving, candles, gifts, travel, religious or cultural festivals, a visit to grandparents, or a family recipe made once a year. The sweet food becomes one element in a larger event structure. The wider ritual and celebration context is examined in Sugar and Celebration: Why Sweet Foods Mark Special Occasions.
That learning process is visible in Birthday Sweets and Learned Reward: Why Celebration Changes Meaning, which explains how celebration can add learned value to sweet foods without claiming that the sugar molecule itself creates the meaning.
People, not ingredients, often carry the emotional weight
When someone says, “This tastes like my grandmother’s kitchen,” the critical memory may be relational. The recipe is a cue to a person. Food can preserve the sensory signature of a relationship because recipes, brands, serving dishes, preparation sounds, and aromas recur in the presence of the same people. Later, tasting the food can reactivate the social world around it.
Food-evoked nostalgia: what direct research shows
The most directly relevant research does not need to infer nostalgia from general memory theory. In three studies, Reid and colleagues specifically tested food as an elicitor of nostalgia. Participants visualized nostalgic or regularly consumed foods, imagined a range of foods, or consumed flavor samples. Across the studies, foods reliably elicited nostalgia. Food-evoked nostalgia was characterized by autobiographical relevance, familiarity, arousal, and a predominantly positive emotional profile.
The studies also linked food-evoked nostalgia with psychological functions commonly observed in nostalgia research, including positive affect, self-esteem, social connectedness, and meaning in life. This supports the idea that a nostalgic food can do more than retrieve a fact. It can momentarily reconnect a person with a meaningful past and with relationships represented in that past.
The evidence is about food nostalgia broadly. It does not establish a unique sugar-specific nostalgia mechanism. A sweet food can be a powerful nostalgic cue, but the research does not justify saying that sucrose has a special pathway for autobiographical nostalgia.
Why nostalgic sweet foods can feel comforting
People often describe nostalgic foods as comforting, but “comfort” can mean several things: sensory pleasure, familiarity, relief from hunger, warmth, routine, emotional reassurance, or a sense of social safety. Treating all of those as one mechanism creates confusion.
A 2026 set of studies by Reid and colleagues directly examined food nostalgia and food comfort. In preregistered experimental studies, nostalgic food experiences increased comfort through stronger social connectedness. The result gives a specific psychological route: a food can evoke nostalgia, nostalgia can make important relationships feel psychologically present, and that connectedness can contribute to comfort.
This does not mean every nostalgic sweet will soothe every person. A childhood food can also evoke grief, homesickness, conflict, loss, or ambivalence. The social meaning of the memory determines much of its emotional direction.
Nostalgia is social: why a dessert can retrieve people as well as places
Modern nostalgia research treats nostalgia as deeply social. Juhl and Biskas describe nostalgia as an impactful social emotion whose memories commonly involve close others and whose effects often operate through social connectedness. Earlier experimental work found that nostalgia can foster self-continuity through social connectedness—a felt connection between one’s past and present.
This social architecture helps explain why the same recipe can matter after migration, bereavement, divorce, adulthood, or the closure of a childhood home. The food is not merely a taste object. It can function as a compact cue for “who was there,” “who I was then,” and “where I belonged.” Classic research on the content, triggers, and functions of nostalgia similarly found that nostalgic narratives often feature the self interacting with close others or participating in important events.
Because the remembered social world is personal, no universal symbolic dictionary can decode a preference for brownies, candy, sweet tea, or cake into a personality type. The article’s boundary is cultural and consumer psychology: meaning is learned in histories, not read directly from ingredients.
Ritual makes food memory easier to organize
Ritual gives repeated experiences a predictable sequence. Birthday cake follows candles; holiday cookies may follow decorating; a particular sweet drink may appear after school; dessert may follow Sunday lunch. Predictable sequences create structured expectations, and structured expectations create multiple retrieval cues.
The cue can therefore be temporal as well as sensory. A winter evening, a specific song, a tablecloth, a brand logo, or the smell of a spice can activate the same network before the food is even tasted. When the food finally appears, it confirms the pattern.
Ritual also explains why apparently minor changes can matter. A different recipe, wrapper, serving dish, or preparation method may make the modern version feel “wrong” even when the sugar level is similar. The remembered target was a configuration, not a nutrient value.
Culture, migration, and identity
Sweet foods are often carriers of cultural memory because recipes and food practices travel across generations. A pastry, preserve, confection, festival bread, sweetened beverage, or regional dessert can connect personal memory to a family history, language, place, or community. In migration, food may become one of the most accessible sensory links to a place that is geographically distant.
This can produce nostalgia that is simultaneously individual and collective. The remembered event belongs to one person, while the food belongs to a shared repertoire. The same dish can therefore support identity at several scales: “my childhood,” “my family,” “my neighborhood,” “my region,” or “our celebration.”
Cultural meaning also changes over time. A food once associated with scarcity can later become a premium heritage product; an inexpensive childhood candy can become a collectible nostalgia brand. Psychological meaning follows histories of use, not a fixed essence in the food.
Can packaging, branding, color, or an old recipe trigger nostalgia before the first bite?
Yes. A sensory memory can be activated by cues that predict the food rather than by the food itself. Packaging graphics, typography, color schemes, mascots, container shapes, store layouts, jingles, and brand names can all become associated with repeated consumption episodes. The cue becomes effective because it was part of the original learning environment.
A review of nostalgia and consumer behavior describes nostalgia as an important influence in advertising, consumption, and product choice, often operating through social connectedness and depending on social boundary conditions. This means nostalgia marketing can work by reactivating a meaningful social past, but it is not universally positive and cannot assume the same memory in every audience.
A “retro” package therefore has two possible routes. For someone who encountered the old design in childhood, it may retrieve a genuine autobiographical network. For someone born later, it may create a stylized sense of pastness without autobiographical recall. Both can shape expectations, but they are psychologically different.
Why remembered sweets can seem to taste better than the modern version
The complaint “it does not taste like it used to” has several possible explanations, and memory is only one of them. The manufacturer may have changed ingredients, processing, size, packaging, storage, or sourcing. The person’s sensory system and preferences may also have changed with age, health, exposure, or context. And the remembered experience may have been reconstructed around a meaningful period of life.
Expectation matters too. If a person strongly expects the old flavor, a small mismatch can become salient. The current food is compared with a remembered prototype assembled from many episodes rather than with a laboratory-preserved sample from twenty years ago.
This is one reason “the original tasted sweeter” should not automatically be interpreted as evidence that the old product contained more sugar. Perceived sweetness depends on the entire sensory context, as explained in Sweetness Perception: Why the Same Sugar Can Taste Different.
Nostalgia, reward learning, and craving
A nostalgic memory can increase the desire to eat a food, but nostalgia and craving are not the same construct. Nostalgia is a sentimental orientation toward the past. Craving is a strong, often specific desire for a food. They can overlap when a nostalgic cue also predicts a rewarding eating experience.
The bridge is learned association. Repeated pairings between a cue and a rewarding food can make the cue itself motivationally relevant. Sugar and Reward Learning: How Sweet Foods Become Powerful Cues explains how predictive cues acquire value, while Sugar Cravings and Habit: How Cues Trigger Automatic Eating covers the transition from environmental cue to learned eating routine.
A song, route home, holiday season, old advertisement, or family visit can therefore produce both nostalgia and a desire for a specific sweet. The fact that a cue can elicit craving does not make the reaction an addiction diagnosis. Craving is one component of many ordinary learned behaviors and is also found in several clinical conditions; it must be interpreted in context.
For the broader distinction between craving, hunger, habit, reward, and the contested “sugar addiction” idea, see Sugar Cravings: Why They Happen and What Psychology Can Explain. For claims about dopamine specifically, Sugar and the Brain: Glucose, Energy, Reward, and Common Myths separates established reward neuroscience from popular “dopamine hit” storytelling.
Does dopamine explain why sweet memories are powerful?
Dopamine is involved in reward learning, motivation, and prediction, but “dopamine makes the memory permanent” is an oversimplification. Human food nostalgia is an autobiographical, multisensory, social phenomenon. Explaining it requires memory retrieval, learned associations, sensory integration, emotion, and social meaning.
A sweet food may have been rewarding when the original events occurred, which can increase attention and learning around cues. Yet a nostalgic memory decades later is not evidence that a specific dopamine surge was recorded as a permanent trace. The research cited here does not support reducing nostalgia to a single neurotransmitter.
Why a vivid food memory can still be reconstructed
Autobiographical memory is not a video file retrieved unchanged from storage. A contemporary review of accuracy and reconstruction in autobiographical memory describes memory as a dynamic, meaning-driven process that combines event traces with reconstructive schemas, later information, social conversation, inference, and the need for coherent personal meaning.
That does not make the memory unreal. It means several dimensions should be separated. The feeling of being transported back can be genuine. The emotional significance can be genuine. The broad event may be accurately remembered. Specific details—exact ingredients, exact sweetness, exact words spoken, exact sequence—can still be altered by reconstruction.
This distinction is especially important in food nostalgia because sensory vividness feels evidential. “I can taste it exactly” is a powerful subjective experience, but subjective vividness does not certify chemical or historical accuracy.
Why nostalgia is often positive—and why it can also hurt
Food nostalgia is often positive in laboratory research, but nostalgia is not identical to happiness. The emotion is commonly described as bittersweet because a valued past can be psychologically present while also being unavailable. The same cake can evoke warmth and grief; the same candy can evoke belonging and homesickness.
The emotional direction depends on what the cue retrieves. A food associated with safety and family closeness can be comforting. A food associated with conflict, illness, deprivation, coercion, or a lost relationship can evoke distress. Researchers’ average findings do not erase individual histories.
This is also why practical advice should stay modest. Recreating a nostalgic recipe can be meaningful, but food should not be treated as a universal emotional-regulation tool or as a substitute for support when memories are persistently distressing.
Why some people have stronger food nostalgia than others
People differ in autobiographical histories, odor sensitivity, familiarity with a food, cultural scripts, family routines, access to childhood foods, and tendency to engage in nostalgic reflection. A cue can only retrieve an association that was available to be learned.
Specificity matters. A mass-market candy may evoke a broad cultural era for millions of people, while a family recipe can evoke a highly specific person for one household. A migrant may experience a regional aroma as a place cue; someone who never lived there may simply experience it as a pleasant food.
Age also changes the relationship between cue and remembered period. Childhood sweet preference is developmentally patterned, but the nostalgic significance of a particular sweet depends on repeated experience. There is no evidence-based rule that a person who loves one type of sweet has a corresponding personality, attachment style, or mental-health profile.
What happens psychologically when a nostalgic sweet-food cue appears?
A useful model is a sequence rather than a single cause. First, a cue is detected: aroma, taste, texture, visual design, place, sound, or context. Second, the cue matches features from prior experiences. Third, associated autobiographical material becomes accessible. Fourth, the remembered episode is reconstructed in the present. Fifth, emotion and social meaning are reactivated. Sixth, the experience may influence current attention, comfort, identity, product choice, or desire to eat the food.
Different episodes can stop at different points. A smell may feel familiar without producing a specific memory. A memory can appear without nostalgia. Nostalgia can occur without craving. Craving can occur without nostalgia. This separation prevents the common mistake of treating all strong food reactions as the same psychological process.
Practical meaning: how to understand your own sugar nostalgia
When a sweet food unexpectedly brings back the past, the most informative question is usually not “What is sugar doing to my brain?” but “What exactly is the cue, and what was it paired with?” Notice the aroma, texture, temperature, visual design, location, people, time of year, music, packaging, and ritual. Often the autobiographical key is more specific than sweetness.
If you want to preserve a family food memory, record more than ingredients. Capture preparation methods, brands or ingredient forms when they matter, serving vessels, timing, sensory descriptors, who prepared the food, and the occasions on which it appeared. A recipe is a technical trace; the autobiographical memory also includes the social context around it.
If a cue evokes a painful memory, there is no requirement to “reclaim” the food. Avoidance, re-engagement, and reinterpretation can have different meanings depending on the person and history. Persistent distress belongs to a broader psychological context than a sugar article can assess.
Evidence map: what is established, what is plausible, and what is unsupported
Established or well-supported
Food can elicit nostalgia, and direct studies show that food-evoked nostalgia is often autobiographically relevant, familiar, arousing, and predominantly positive. Reid et al. (2023) provides the strongest direct evidence for this claim.
Flavor is multisensory rather than a pure taste signal. Spence (2015) reviews how multiple sensory channels are integrated into flavor experience. Odor-cued autobiographical memories can also have distinctive emotional and temporal qualities, as summarized by Hackländer et al. (2019).
Nostalgia is strongly social and can support feelings of connectedness and self-continuity. This is supported by Juhl and Biskas (2023) and experimental work by Sedikides et al. (2016).
Supported but context-dependent
Food nostalgia can contribute to comfort through social connectedness. The most direct evidence comes from Reid et al. (2026), but the effect is not a guarantee that every nostalgic food will comfort every person.
Nostalgia can influence consumer response to advertising, products, and brands. The review by Weingarten and Wei (2023) emphasizes both social mechanisms and boundary conditions, so nostalgia marketing should not be treated as uniformly effective.
Plausible and consistent with broader evidence, but not established as a unique sugar mechanism
Sweetness, reward value, repetition, and childhood rituals can help sweet foods become salient learned cues. This is consistent with developmental sweet-taste research and reward-learning principles. Direct experiments isolating “sugar nostalgia” from the rest of a food’s sensory and social context are limited, so the strongest scientific framing is food-evoked nostalgia involving sweet foods.
Unsupported simplifications
Current evidence does not support the claim that sugar molecules uniquely store autobiographical memories, that a dopamine spike permanently “burns in” a sweet memory, that more sugar necessarily creates stronger nostalgia, that vivid nostalgia proves exact memory accuracy, or that nostalgic craving demonstrates addiction.
Sugar nostalgia versus “sugar and memory”: two different search intents
Sugar nostalgia asks how a sweet food becomes a cue for autobiographical memory, emotion, identity, social connection, and learned meaning. Sugar and Memory: What Human Research Shows asks a different question: what human research shows about dietary sugar or glucose exposure and performance on memory tasks or longer-term cognitive outcomes.
Keeping those intents separate prevents two category errors. First, a memory triggered by cake does not show that eating sugar improved memory performance. Second, research on glucose and cognitive tasks does not explain why the smell of a childhood cake can make someone feel transported back to a family kitchen.
Frequently asked questions
Why do sweets remind me of childhood?
Sweet foods are common in childhood rewards, family routines, school environments, holidays, and celebrations. Their aroma, flavor, texture, packaging, and context can become associated with people and places. Encountering a matching cue later can retrieve that autobiographical network.
Is it really the sugar causing the memory?
Usually the best explanation is the whole learned sensory event, not sugar alone. Sweetness can contribute to salience and liking, but aroma, texture, context, visual cues, and social history may be the actual retrieval cues.
What is the Proust effect?
The Proust effect is the striking experience of an autobiographical memory being evoked by sensory cues, especially smell and taste. Research finds that such memories can be unusually emotional, self-relevant, and familiar.
Why can one smell make me feel transported back in time?
Odors can act as associative cues to autobiographical events. Studies have found that odor-cued memories can be especially emotional and, in some samples, reach earlier periods of life than memories cued by words or pictures.
Are food memories more accurate because they feel vivid?
No. Emotional vividness and factual accuracy are different. Odor-cued memories can feel especially powerful without being more accurate than memories cued in other ways, and autobiographical memory is reconstructive.
Why does an old candy or dessert sometimes taste disappointing now?
The product may have changed, your sensory preferences may have changed, the context is different, and the remembered target may be a reconstruction of many experiences rather than one exact sample. Nostalgic meaning can exceed the sensory properties of the present food.
Can old packaging trigger nostalgia before I taste the food?
Yes. Visual brand cues can become associated with repeated consumption episodes and can retrieve memories or expectations before eating. Nostalgia marketing often works through learned associations and social meaning, although effects differ across people and contexts.
Can nostalgia make me crave a sweet food?
It can. A nostalgic cue can also be a learned reward cue, producing desire for a specific food. Nostalgia and craving remain distinct psychological processes, and craving alone does not establish addiction.
Why do family recipes feel so powerful?
A family recipe repeats a relatively stable sensory pattern in a recurring social context. The food can therefore cue not only a flavor but also people, places, routines, stories, and a sense of continuity across time.
Can nostalgic food memories be sad?
Yes. Nostalgia is often positive on average, but a valued past can also evoke grief, loss, homesickness, or ambivalence. The emotion depends on the autobiographical history attached to the food.
Do children form stronger memories for sweet foods?
Children generally show a stronger preference for sweetness than adults, but that does not mean all sweet-food memories are stronger. Memory strength depends on repetition, distinctiveness, emotion, context, attention, and social meaning as well as liking.
Is sugar nostalgia a sign of sugar addiction?
No. Nostalgia is not an addiction symptom, and a nostalgic craving does not establish addiction. The idea of “sugar addiction” remains scientifically contested and is not a stand-alone clinical diagnosis.
Is this the same as sugar affecting memory performance?
No. Autobiographical cueing and cognitive performance are different questions. For studies of glucose, dietary sugar, and memory tasks, see Sugar and Memory: What Human Research Shows.
For the broader framework that places nostalgia alongside sweetness, reward, habit, culture, and consumer meaning, see Psychology of Sugar: Sweetness, Reward, Habit, Culture, and Meaning. The neighboring Sugar and Comfort Food: Why Sweet Foods Can Feel Emotionally Soothing article focuses specifically on why a familiar sweet food can feel emotionally soothing.
Related Articles
References
Fivush, R., & Grysman, A. (2023). Accuracy and reconstruction in autobiographical memory: (Re)consolidating neuroscience and sociocultural developmental approaches. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 14(3), e1620. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1620. PubMed
Green, J. D., Reid, C. A., Kneuer, M. A., & Hedgebeth, M. V. (2023). The Proust effect: Scents, food, and nostalgia. Current Opinion in Psychology, 50, 101562. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101562. PubMed
Hackländer, R. P. M., Janssen, S. M. J., & Bermeitinger, C. (2019). An in-depth review of the methods, findings, and theories associated with odor-evoked autobiographical memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 401–429. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1545-3. PubMed
Herz, R. S. (1998). Are odors the best cues to memory? A cross-modal comparison of associative memory stimuli. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 855, 670–674. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10643.x. PubMed
Herz, R. S. (2004). A naturalistic analysis of autobiographical memories triggered by olfactory, visual and auditory stimuli. Chemical Senses, 29(3), 217–224. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh025. PubMed
Juhl, J., & Biskas, M. (2023). Nostalgia: An impactful social emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, 101545. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101545. PubMed
Mennella, J. A., Bobowski, N. K., & Reed, D. R. (2016). The development of sweet taste: From biology to hedonics. Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 17(2), 171–178. DOI: 10.1007/s11154-016-9360-5. PubMed
Reid, C. A., Green, J. D., Buchmaier, S., McSween, D. K., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2023). Food-evoked nostalgia. Cognition and Emotion, 37(1), 34–48. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2142525. PubMed
Reid, C. A., Green, J. D., Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., McSween, D. K., & Buchmaier, S. (2026). Food nostalgia and food comfort: The role of social connectedness. Cognition and Emotion, 40(1), 217–225. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2479170. PubMed
Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Cheung, W.-Y., Routledge, C., Hepper, E. G., Arndt, J., Vail, K., Zhou, X., Brackstone, K., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2016). Nostalgia fosters self-continuity: Uncovering the mechanism (social connectedness) and consequence (eudaimonic well-being). Emotion, 16(4), 524–539. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000136. PubMed
Spence, C. (2015). Multisensory flavor perception. Cell, 161(1), 24–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.007. PubMed
Weingarten, E., & Wei, Z. (2023). Nostalgia and consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 49, 101555. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101555. PubMed
Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2006). Nostalgia: Content, triggers, functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 975–993. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.975. PubMed
Willander, J., & Larsson, M. (2006). Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 240–244. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193837. PubMed