Tea and Social Bonding: Hospitality, Conversation, Ritual, and Belonging
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Tea can support social bonding because it gives people a familiar reason to gather, a shared object of attention, a sequence of hospitable actions, and enough time for conversation to unfold. The strongest evidence is not that tea contains a special “bonding” compound. It is that social rituals, reciprocal conversation, shared food and drink, and culturally meaningful hospitality can organize interaction in ways that make connection easier. Tea often works as the setting and script for those processes.
That distinction matters. A cup of tea does not automatically create closeness, and drinking tea is not a treatment for loneliness, anxiety, or relationship problems. Tea can become socially meaningful when people use it to welcome, offer, receive, pause, talk, remember, and repeat a shared practice.
This is one part of the broader psychology of tea. Here the focus is narrower: how tea participates in hospitality, conversation, ritual, and belonging, what research can actually support, and why the social meaning of tea differs across cultures and relationships.
What Does “Tea and Social Bonding” Actually Mean?
Social bonding refers to processes through which people create, maintain, or experience interpersonal connection. In ordinary life, bonding may involve familiarity, mutual attention, trust, self-disclosure, shared memory, coordinated action, reciprocity, a sense of being welcomed, and the feeling that one belongs in a relationship or group.
Tea can enter that process in several roles. It can be an offered object of hospitality, a reason to sit down, a repeated family routine, a workplace pause, a meeting ritual, a marker of cultural identity, or simply something to do with the hands while two people talk. The beverage itself is only one element. The people, relationship, place, timing, expectations, and cultural script often matter more.
Evidence from the broader psychology of relationships helps explain why. A classic meta-analysis found reliable links between self-disclosure and liking: people tend to disclose more to people they like, people who disclose can be liked more, and disclosure itself can contribute to liking under some conditions (Collins & Miller, 1994). Experimental work also suggests that reciprocal turn-taking in self-disclosure can increase liking and perceived closeness during initial interactions (Sprecher et al., 2013). Tea is not the cause in these studies. What tea can do is create a practical conversational frame in which those relationship processes can occur.
Evidence at a Glance
Relatively Well Established
General social-psychological evidence supports the importance of reciprocal conversation, self-disclosure, ritualized group behavior, and some forms of coordinated action for affiliation and social connection. Reviews of ritual research describe social connection as one of the major functions rituals can serve (Hobson et al., 2018). A meta-analysis of experimentally manipulated interpersonal synchrony found positive effects on prosocial behavior, perceived social bonding, social cognition, and positive affect, although effect sizes and mechanisms differed across outcomes (Mogan et al., 2017).
Supported, but Broader Than Tea
Research on eating and drinking together suggests that commensality is an important form of sociality. A UK survey study found that people who ate socially more often also reported greater happiness, life satisfaction, trust, community engagement, and social support; its path analysis was consistent with social eating contributing to bondedness, but the design does not make every causal interpretation certain (Dunbar, 2017). A later systematic review of commercial hospitality research cautioned that the benefits of eating together are often described too simply and that commensality can include inclusion, exclusion, hierarchy, privacy needs, and unwanted social pressure (Oren et al., 2024).
Tea-Specific Evidence
Tea-specific evidence is strongest for cultural and ethnographic claims about tea as a practice of hospitality, social interaction, identity, and relationship maintenance. UNESCO documents tea-related social practices in China as part of socialization, greeting guests, family and neighborhood relationships, and shared identity (UNESCO, 2022a). UNESCO separately describes the culture of çay in Azerbaijan and Türkiye as a practice of hospitality, social interaction, relationship maintenance, and cultural identity (UNESCO, 2022b). Recent ethnographic research in Shandong likewise describes tea as facilitating social interaction, identity negotiation, and cultural continuity (Zhao, 2026).
Limited or Unsupported
There is no strong evidence that an ordinary cup of brewed tea chemically causes interpersonal bonding. Evidence about caffeine, L-theanine, polyphenols, extracts, or supplements should not be converted into a claim that tea makes people socially connected. The social-bonding mechanisms discussed here are primarily interpersonal, behavioral, contextual, and cultural.
Likewise, the popular idea that physically holding a warm drink automatically makes a person socially “warmer” is not a secure foundation for explaining tea bonding. High-powered replications of the famous warmth-priming effect found near-zero effects (Chabris et al., 2019), and a later meta-analysis concluded that temperature effects on prosocial and antisocial behavior are weak and inconsistent across comparable studies (Lynott, 2023). Warm tea can feel physically pleasant and can be learned as a comfort cue, but “warm cup equals warmer personality” is not an established psychological law.
Why Tea Is So Useful for Hospitality
Hospitality gives a relationship a structure. Someone offers; someone accepts, declines, or chooses; preparation follows; space is made; attention is directed toward the guest. Tea fits this sequence unusually well because it is divisible, repeatable, easy to share, and compatible with short visits or long conversations.
The social meaning lies partly in the offer. “Would you like tea?” can function as more than a beverage question. Depending on the relationship and culture, it may mean: you are welcome to stay; I am making room for you; we can talk; we do not need to rush; I know how you take it; or I want to care for you in a familiar way. These meanings are learned through repeated experience rather than contained in the liquid itself.
Offering also creates reciprocity without requiring exact symmetry. A guest may receive the tea now and host later. A family member may prepare it because another person had a difficult day. Friends may alternate who makes the pot. In many relationships, this repeated exchange becomes part of how care is enacted.
Hospitality Is Culturally Specific
There is no single universal “tea hospitality.” In China, UNESCO describes tea sharing across homes, workplaces, tea houses, restaurants, and temples and links it with socialization, weddings, welcoming guests, and building relationships among families and neighbors. The Smithsonian’s National Museum of Asian Art likewise notes that by the Tang dynasty tea had become embedded across social strata and that tea houses were important to social life (National Museum of Asian Art).
In Azerbaijan and Türkiye, UNESCO documents çay as a distinct shared tradition in which freshly brewed tea, characteristic vessels, accompaniments, and hosting practices participate in hospitality and identity. These practices should be described on their own terms rather than treated as interchangeable with Chinese tea traditions, Japanese chanoyu, British afternoon tea, Indian chai practices, North African tea traditions, or contemporary café culture.
That cultural precision is important psychologically. A familiar gesture can feel welcoming because participants already know what it means. The same gesture may feel formal, unfamiliar, prestigious, intimate, ordinary, or even stressful to someone who learned a different social script.
Tea Creates a Bounded Period of Shared Time
One overlooked feature of tea is temporal. Tea takes time to prepare, cool, pour, sip, refill, and finish. That sequence gives interaction a beginning, middle, and end. It can make a visit feel less abrupt and a conversation less exposed.
This matters because relationships often need a reason for people to remain in the same place long enough for interaction to develop. A cup provides a small, legitimate interval. The person does not have to announce, “Let us now spend twenty-five minutes strengthening our friendship.” They can make tea.
Tea can therefore reduce the organizational friction of connection. The kettle boils while people settle. The first pour gives them something concrete to notice. Refilling creates natural pauses. The end of the pot can become a soft transition toward leaving, continuing, or making another round.
These time cues are especially powerful when repeated. A weekly tea with a parent, an afternoon cup with a colleague, or tea after dinner can become a predictable meeting point in the relationship. For the broader psychology of repeated preparation, see Tea Ritual Psychology.
Why Conversation Can Feel Easier Over Tea
Tea does not make conversation intimate by itself. It can, however, change the interactional setting in several useful ways.
It Provides a Shared Object of Attention
Direct face-to-face conversation can feel intense, especially early in a relationship or during a difficult topic. Cups, teaware, aroma, pouring, and food provide neutral points of attention. Participants can look at the tea, comment on it, serve one another, or pause without making the silence itself the center of attention.
This can support what ordinary conversation often needs: alternating focus between the other person and a shared external activity. The shared activity does not replace emotional engagement. It can make engagement easier to pace.
It Creates Natural Turn-Taking
Pouring, passing, asking preferences, waiting for water, tasting, and refilling introduce small conversational transitions. Those transitions can slow rapid-fire exchanges and create openings for the other person to respond. That matters because reciprocal interaction is central to relationship development. In experimental work, immediate turn-taking in self-disclosure produced better interpersonal outcomes than long uninterrupted disclosures (Sprecher et al., 2013).
It Makes Small Talk Functional Rather Than Empty
“Which tea do you want?” “Is it too strong?” “Do you take milk?” “Where did you get this?” These are low-stakes questions, but low-stakes conversation is often how people calibrate comfort, attention, and mutual knowledge. Small talk can establish rhythm before more personal material appears.
Over repeated meetings, preference questions also become memory cues. Remembering that someone takes black tea without sugar or prefers jasmine can signal attention. The factual preference is trivial; the remembered person is not.
Ritual Changes the Social Meaning of the Cup
A ritual is more than repetition. Psychological reviews emphasize patterned, often formalized actions whose meaning depends on context, symbolism, and shared expectations. Rituals can organize emotion, performance, and social connection (Hobson et al., 2018). Group-ritual research also links ritual with identifying group members, signaling commitment, cooperation, and cohesion (Watson-Jones & Legare, 2016).
Tea can become ritualized at many levels. A formal ceremony may involve highly specified procedures, objects, roles, and etiquette. A family ritual may be as simple as using the same pot every Sunday. Friends may always meet at the same café. Colleagues may make tea after a meeting. Partners may end the day with the same blend. The psychological effect depends on what the sequence has come to mean to those people.
Predictability Can Make Participation Easier
Repeated scripts reduce uncertainty. People know where to sit, what happens next, who pours, when conversation begins, and how long the interaction is likely to last. Predictability can free attention from logistics and place it on the relationship or the sensory experience.
At the same time, formality can raise pressure for newcomers. If the rules are unfamiliar, a ritual may make a person self-conscious rather than connected. The same structure that creates belonging for insiders can mark who knows the rules and who does not.
Coordination Can Matter
Some rituals involve coordinated movements and timing: passing cups, serving in an order, raising cups together, repeating phrases, or moving through a shared sequence. General research on behavioral synchrony suggests that synchronous action can increase perceived social bonding and prosocial outcomes on average (Mogan et al., 2017).
That finding should be applied carefully. It does not show that every tea ritual causes bonding, and not every tea practice is synchronous. It supports a broader mechanism: coordinated action can contribute to affiliation when participants experience it as meaningful and voluntary.
Belonging Grows From Shared Meanings, Not Just Shared Consumption
Two people can drink the same tea and experience entirely different social worlds. One person may taste a childhood kitchen; another may taste an unfamiliar beverage. One may recognize a holiday practice; another may recognize a study routine. Belonging depends on the network of meanings around the cup.
That is why tea often becomes powerful in families, friendships, communities, and diasporic life. A familiar aroma, vessel, preparation method, or serving sequence can connect the present interaction to earlier relationships and places. Our dedicated article on tea and nostalgia examines how aroma, memory, family rituals, and learned meaning interact.
Recent ethnographic work provides a useful tea-specific example. Research in Shandong Province describes tea as a communicative medium through which people negotiate social interaction, identity, and cultural continuity in everyday life (Zhao, 2026). This kind of evidence is qualitative and context-specific. Its value is not that it proves a universal tea effect; it shows how tea can become woven into actual social worlds.
Belonging Can Be Ordinary
Belonging is often discussed as if it must involve dramatic emotional closeness. Much social belonging is quieter. It can be the experience of knowing where the cups are, being included without a special invitation, having “your” mug in someone else’s home, recognizing the usual time tea is made, or being offered a refill without needing to ask.
These small signs matter because they indicate familiarity with the local script. A person moves from guest to regular, from outsider to someone whose preferences are known.
Tea Can Mark Identity
Tea practices can also communicate family, regional, national, generational, religious, class, or subcultural identities. Such meanings are historically produced and can change. They should not be turned into personality stereotypes. Drinking a particular tea does not reveal a fixed psychological type, and no culture has one homogeneous relationship with tea.
UNESCO’s documentation is useful precisely because it describes specific communities and practices rather than a universal “tea personality.” In China, tea-related activities are described as contributing to shared identity and continuity. In Azerbaijan and Türkiye, çay is described as a symbol of identity, hospitality, and social interaction. Those are documented cultural meanings, not claims that all Chinese, Azerbaijani, or Turkish people behave the same way.
Tea Houses, Tea Rooms, and the Importance of Place
Social bonding does not happen only between two people. Places shape who can meet, how long they can stay, how visible they are to others, how much noise surrounds them, and whether interaction feels private, public, formal, or casual.
Tea houses and tea rooms can function as recurring social settings because they combine beverage consumption with a place to remain. Historical and cultural evidence shows that these settings have taken very different forms. The Smithsonian notes the importance of tea houses to social life in historical China. Research on British rambling culture in the 1930s describes rural tearooms as settings where shared tea, food, conversation, and hospitality helped create and maintain social relations and group identities (Bell & Moran, 2022).
For the dedicated environmental-psychology treatment of tea houses—atmosphere, social presence, ritual, service rhythm, and why people linger—see Tea House Psychology: Atmosphere, Social Presence, Ritual, and Why People Linger.
Place also affects inclusion. Cost, etiquette, location, accessibility, noise, seating, time limits, and social norms determine who feels able to use a venue. A beautiful tea room can support conversation for one group and feel exclusive to another. A busy tea stall may offer more spontaneous contact than a formal venue. The psychology of a social tea space therefore depends on its social design as much as its décor.
Tea Breaks Can Maintain Weak Ties as Well as Close Relationships
Not every social benefit comes from deep disclosure. Many relationships are maintained through brief, repeated contact: greeting a coworker, checking in with a neighbor, sharing a few minutes with a classmate, or talking with someone who is familiar but not intimate.
A tea break can create these small encounters. Their value may lie in frequency and low pressure rather than emotional depth. Repeated ordinary contact can keep a relationship available for future support or conversation.
This is different from claiming that tea breaks universally improve workplace wellbeing or performance. Outcomes depend on workload, organizational culture, voluntariness, group dynamics, and whether the break actually allows social recovery. The dedicated Tea Break Psychology page owns that narrower intent; this article keeps the focus on bonding.
Tea, Memory, and the Social Continuity of Relationships
Social bonding is partly prospective—people become closer—but it is also retrospective. Relationships are held together by remembered episodes, shared jokes, familiar places, recurring foods, and sensory cues.
Tea can become one of those cues. The aroma of bergamot may evoke a grandparent’s kitchen. Strong black tea may recall a workplace. A chipped pot may belong to the history of a friendship. A particular serving style may evoke migration, home, or family gatherings.
When people reminisce together, the drink can become a prompt rather than the subject. In Dunbar’s social-eating study, evening meals associated with greater post-meal closeness also involved more laughter and reminiscing (Dunbar, 2017). That result concerns meals broadly, not tea specifically, but it illustrates a plausible pathway: shared consumption creates a setting in which memory and conversation reinforce relationships.
Does the Warmth of Tea Make People Feel Socially Warmer?
This is one of the most repeated claims in popular psychology, and it needs a careful answer.
An influential 2008 study reported that brief physical warmth could influence judgments of interpersonal warmth and prosocial choices. Later, larger and more tightly controlled replications did not reproduce those effects. Chabris and colleagues reported near-zero effects in two field replications with substantially larger samples (Chabris et al., 2019). A 2023 review and meta-analysis concluded that temperature-prosociality findings are weak and inconsistent across comparable studies (Lynott, 2023).
So the defensible explanation for tea and social bonding is not “warm hands create warm hearts.” Temperature can influence sensory pleasure, comfort, pacing, and the learned meaning of a familiar drink. Those are separate mechanisms. For the broader role of familiar warmth and safety cues, see Tea and Comfort.
Does Caffeine Make Social Tea More Bonding?
There is no good basis for treating caffeine as the social-bonding mechanism of tea. Caffeine can alter alertness and subjective arousal, and responses vary with dose, timing, tolerance, expectations, and individual sensitivity. But evidence about caffeine should not be stretched into a claim that caffeinated tea strengthens relationships.
In fact, the same social ritual can occur with decaffeinated tea, herbal infusions, or very lightly caffeinated tea. This is another reason to separate beverage chemistry from social meaning. The general tea overview explains tea types, caffeine, brewing, benefits, taste, and psychology without treating one compound as an explanation for every tea experience.
When Tea Does Not Create Connection
Shared tea is easy to romanticize. Research on commensality gives a useful correction: eating and drinking together can support sociality, but social gatherings can also contain hierarchy, exclusion, pressure, conflict, or unwanted obligation (Oren et al., 2024).
Forced Participation
A “friendly” tea break is not socially restorative when attendance is effectively mandatory, when someone is expected to perform sociability, or when declining is treated as rejection.
Unfamiliar Etiquette
Formal rules can create meaning for experienced participants and anxiety for newcomers. Good hosting often includes making the rules legible rather than testing the guest’s knowledge.
Status and Hierarchy
Who serves, who receives first, who chooses the tea, who pays, who occupies the best seat, and who is expected to clean up can all carry social meaning. Ritual can express equality, but it can also reproduce hierarchy.
Exclusion
A shared ritual strengthens a boundary as well as a bond. The people inside the gathering may feel closer partly because the group has recognizable membership. That boundary can be benign, but it can also leave others out.
Sensory or Dietary Mismatch
Some people dislike tea, avoid caffeine, have sensory sensitivities, do not want hot drinks, or associate tea with unpleasant experiences. A ritual becomes more hospitable when participation does not depend on consuming one specific beverage.
Conversation Without Responsiveness
Sitting together is not the same as connecting. A one-sided monologue, repeated interruption, contempt, coercive disclosure, or lack of attention will not become bonding simply because tea is present. Relationship processes still matter.
Tea as a Low-Pressure Social Invitation
One reason tea is socially useful is that the invitation can remain modest. “Come for tea” can offer contact without requiring a grand occasion, a full meal, alcohol, or a highly structured activity. That can lower the practical threshold for meeting.
The invitation also leaves room for different depths of interaction. Two people can talk seriously, exchange ordinary news, sit quietly, play a game, work beside each other, or simply share the drink. The social value is the opportunity for mutually acceptable presence.
This can be especially useful when a relationship is new, when people are reconnecting after time apart, or when a difficult conversation needs a gentle beginning. Tea should not be presented as therapy for social anxiety or loneliness. It is better understood as one accessible format for contact.
How to Use Tea to Support Connection Without Forcing It
Make the Invitation Specific and Easy to Decline
“Want to have tea for half an hour this afternoon?” is often easier to respond to than an open-ended “we should catch up sometime.” A clear time and low-pressure exit reduce uncertainty.
Offer Real Choice
Ask what the other person wants, including non-tea options. Hospitality is strengthened when the guest’s preference matters more than the host’s performance.
Let Preparation Be Part of the Interaction
Making tea together can distribute attention and create natural conversation. One person can choose the leaves while another fills the kettle or sets out cups. Shared activity can be useful when direct conversation initially feels too intense.
Use Ritual as Structure, Not as a Test
If a tea practice has special etiquette, explain it lightly. Ritual becomes socially generous when it gives participants a path into the experience rather than demonstrating who already belongs.
Protect Pauses
Silence is not necessarily failure. Sipping, pouring, and noticing the drink give conversation permission to pause. A pause can make the next disclosure more thoughtful.
Remember Preferences
Remembering how someone takes tea is a small form of interpersonal memory. It signals that previous interactions left a trace. The same principle applies to favorite snacks, preferred cups, caffeine limits, and whether a person would rather have something else entirely.
Create Recurrence When the Relationship Benefits From It
A single cup can be pleasant. A repeated cup can become part of the relationship’s history. Recurrence creates opportunities for continuity: the next conversation can pick up where the last one ended.
What Tea Can and Cannot Do for Belonging
Tea can help organize the conditions for belonging: invitation, shared time, recognizable ritual, conversation, memory, and repeated participation. Cultural traditions can give those actions meanings that are much larger than the beverage itself.
Tea cannot guarantee closeness. It cannot substitute for responsiveness, respect, reciprocity, or safety in a relationship. It cannot turn an exclusionary group into an inclusive one merely because everyone shares a pot. And no credible evidence supports treating brewed tea as a biochemical intervention for social connection.
The useful conclusion is simpler and stronger: tea often becomes socially powerful because people make it part of how they welcome, attend to, remember, and spend time with one another.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why Does Tea Bring People Together?
Tea can bring people together because it provides a familiar reason to meet, a sequence of hospitable actions, a shared object of attention, and time for conversation. General research supports mechanisms involving reciprocal disclosure, ritual, coordinated behavior, and commensality. Tea-specific cultural evidence shows that many communities have explicitly built hospitality and social interaction around tea. The drink facilitates the setting; it does not automatically cause the bond.
Why Is Tea Associated With Hospitality?
Tea is easy to offer, prepare, share, refill, and accompany with food. More importantly, many cultures have developed specific meanings around serving it to guests. UNESCO documents tea as a hospitality and relationship practice in both Chinese tea traditions and the culture of çay in Azerbaijan and Türkiye. Other tea traditions have their own histories and etiquette.
Can Drinking Tea Together Strengthen a Relationship?
It can create conditions that support a relationship: time together, reciprocal attention, conversation, shared memory, and repeated ritual. Evidence from relationship psychology supports those mechanisms generally, while direct experimental evidence that “tea itself strengthens relationships” is limited. The quality of the interaction matters more than the beverage.
Does Tea Make Conversation Easier?
For some people, yes. Tea gives participants something to do and look at, creates natural pauses, supports small talk, and can make a meeting feel less exposed. This is a plausible interactional mechanism rather than a universal effect. Some people prefer walking, coffee, food, an activity, or no beverage at all.
Is Tea Good for Loneliness?
Tea is not a treatment for loneliness. A recurring tea invitation may create an opportunity for meaningful contact, and social rituals can support connection when other people are genuinely present and responsive. Drinking tea alone cannot be assumed to reduce loneliness, and forcing social participation can make an experience worse.
Is Tea Bonding Because It Is Warm?
The popular “physical warmth creates interpersonal warmth” explanation is not well supported by replication evidence. Later high-powered studies failed to reproduce the original effect, and meta-analytic evidence describes temperature effects on prosocial behavior as weak and inconsistent. Warmth can still contribute to sensory comfort and learned associations, which is a different claim.
Do Formal Tea Ceremonies Create Stronger Bonds Than Casual Tea?
There is no universal hierarchy in which more formal tea produces stronger relationships. Formal rituals can create shared attention, symbolic meaning, and coordinated action, while casual tea can allow spontaneity and easy conversation. The social effect depends on participants, cultural meaning, familiarity, voluntariness, and the quality of interaction.
Can Tea Rituals Exclude People?
Yes. Rituals define participation, and shared practices can mark insiders and outsiders. Cost, etiquette, cultural knowledge, dietary needs, sensory preferences, status rules, and invitation patterns can all affect who feels welcome. Hospitality is strongest when the ritual can accommodate the guest rather than requiring the guest to prove belonging.
Is Tea Culture the Same Everywhere?
No. Tea traditions differ in history, ingredients, preparation, vessels, etiquette, social setting, and symbolic meaning. Chinese tea practices, Azerbaijani and Turkish çay culture, Japanese chanoyu, British afternoon tea, South Asian chai practices, North African tea traditions, and contemporary tea cafés should not be collapsed into one universal culture.
What Is the Simplest Way to Make Tea More Social?
Invite a specific person, give the meeting a manageable time, offer genuine choice, make the drink without turning it into a performance, and pay attention to the conversation. The relational behavior matters more than choosing a supposedly “bonding” tea.
Related Articles
References
Bell, D., & Moran, T. (2022). “Tea and Hot Water Provided”: Conviviality, commensality, and hospitality in the rambling notes of W. E. Hopkin 1930–1940. Dublin Gastronomy Symposium. https://doi.org/10.21427/jatt-ze20
Chabris, C. F., Heck, P. R., Mandart, J., Benjamin, D. J., & Simons, D. J. (2019). No evidence that experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth: Two failures to replicate Williams and Bargh (2008). Social Psychology, 50(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000361
Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.457
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2017). Breaking bread: The functions of social eating. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 3, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0061-4
Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D., & Inzlicht, M. (2018). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317734944
Lynott, D. (2023). The effects of temperature on prosocial and antisocial behaviour: A review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(3), 1177–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12626
Mogan, R., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009
National Museum of Asian Art, Smithsonian Institution. (n.d.). Tea Culture in China. https://asia.si.edu/education/educator-resources/teaching-china-with-the-smithsonian/lesson-plans/tea-culture-in-china/
Oren, O., Arcodia, C., Robinson, R. N. S., & Novais, M. A. (2024). Commensality research in commercial hospitality: A systematic review. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 117, 103663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103663
Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Wondra, J. D., Hilaire, N., & Wallpe, K. (2013). Taking turns: Reciprocal self-disclosure promotes liking in initial interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 860–866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.017
UNESCO. (2022a). Traditional tea processing techniques and associated social practices in China. Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/traditional-tea-processing-techniques-and-associated-social-practices-in-china-01884
UNESCO. (2022b). Culture of Çay (tea), a symbol of identity, hospitality and social interaction. Intangible Cultural Heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/moutya-01685
Watson-Jones, R. E., & Legare, C. H. (2016). The social functions of group rituals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415618486
Zhao, Z. (2026). Tea as a communicative medium: Materiality and the everyday life in Shandong Province. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2025.2593605