How Long Does Eating Disorder Recovery Take?
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Eating Disorders & Disordered Eating · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Eating disorder recovery can take months to begin showing meaningful changes and years to become stable across physical health, eating behavior, and psychological well-being. Some people make substantial progress during a structured course of treatment lasting several months. Others need repeated treatment episodes or longer-term support. There is no medically reliable countdown that predicts when one particular person will be fully recovered. The timeline depends on the diagnosis, health risks, age, treatment access, individual response, and the definition of recovery being used.
The most useful distinction is between how long treatment lasts, how soon specific symptoms improve, and how long sustained recovery takes. A four- or six-month therapy program is a treatment schedule, not a deadline for complete recovery. The 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis by Solmi and colleagues, which synthesized 415 studies involving 88,372 people, found that recovery became more common with longer follow-up, but outcomes differed widely across studies. This article explains what those numbers mean, what changes often happen first, and how clinicians evaluate progress safely.
The Short Answer: How Many Months or Years Does Recovery Take?
A reasonable evidence-based answer is that change may begin during the first weeks and months of care, while recovery across all domains may require considerably longer. Many established outpatient treatments are organized over several months to approximately one year; ongoing monitoring and relapse-prevention work may continue after the structured program ends. Some people reach sustained remission within one or two years, while others recover over several years or longer. Neither an early response nor a difficult first year can determine the eventual outcome for an individual.
Across diagnoses, the Solmi et al. review reported pooled recovery proportions of 42% among studies with follow-up shorter than two years, 43% at two to under four years, 54% at four to under six years, 59% at six to under eight years, 64% at eight to under ten years, and 67% in studies with follow-up of ten years or longer. These numbers describe different study populations observed at different follow-up durations. They are not a prediction that a specific percentage of the same patients recover at each anniversary, nor do they show that waiting without treatment leads to recovery.
The practical message is hopeful and clinically important: recovery remains possible after a long illness, and prompt diagnosis-specific treatment provides a structured way to address both current risks and longer-term recovery. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, eating disorders occur across ages, sexes, and body sizes; they can be serious and potentially life-threatening, and treatment can support recovery.
What Does It Mean to Be Recovered From an Eating Disorder?
Recovery is a multidimensional clinical process. It includes improvement in physical health and nutritional functioning; reduction and cessation of eating-disorder behaviors; changes in the fears, beliefs, and compulsions that sustain the disorder; and renewed participation in relationships, school, work, rest, and ordinary activities. The relevant physical and psychological goals vary by diagnosis, developmental stage, medical history, and individual circumstances. For example, restoring adequate nutrition is essential in restrictive illness, while treating recurrent binge eating and related distress is central in binge eating disorder.
Physical and nutritional recovery
Physical recovery involves the restoration and maintenance of nutrition, hydration, and physiological stability, alongside treatment of complications. Clinicians may monitor pulse, blood pressure, temperature, electrolyte status, cardiac symptoms, growth in children, menstrual or other endocrine health where relevant, and functioning of affected organ systems. A single weight or body mass index cannot establish medical safety or psychiatric recovery. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine emphasizes the importance of growth history and the magnitude and rate of weight change in young people with restrictive disorders, including atypical anorexia nervosa and ARFID.
Behavioral recovery
Behavioral recovery means that eating-disorder behaviors have stopped or become substantially less frequent and less disruptive. Which behaviors matter depends on the diagnosis: clinically significant restriction or avoidance; recurrent binge episodes and loss of control; purging or compensatory behaviors; and compulsive routines that interfere with nourishment or daily functioning. Reduced frequency is genuine progress, yet remission and full recovery are usually assessed over an established period rather than by one symptom-free day or week.
Psychological recovery
Psychological recovery involves reduced distress and preoccupation, more flexible responses to food-related situations, improved tolerance of uncertainty, and less domination of life by eating-disorder rules. In anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa, body-shape and weight concerns may need sustained attention. In ARFID, treatment may instead focus on sensory sensitivity, fear of aversive consequences, or lack of interest in eating. An influential recovery-definition study by Bardone-Cone and colleagues demonstrated why assessing physical, behavioral, and psychological dimensions together offers a fuller account than relying on outward signs alone. Its precise research thresholds are not universal diagnostic rules or appropriate self-assessment criteria.
Social and functional recovery
The ability to share meals without extreme anxiety, attend school or work, travel, maintain relationships, and make daily decisions with less interference can reflect meaningful recovery. Some people regain aspects of social functioning early; others rebuild them after symptoms and physical instability have improved. A person's sense of identity, autonomy, and quality of life belongs in the assessment, even when a clinical trial defines recovery more narrowly.
What Does Long-Term Research Actually Show?
Long-term research offers population-level evidence, not individual timetables. The 2024 World Psychiatry synthesis combined results from anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, OSFED, and mixed clinical groups. Its overall pooled recovery estimate was 46% at a mean follow-up of approximately 45 months. This should not be interpreted as the probability of recovery for every diagnosis or every person. The included studies used different definitions of recovery, recruited different populations, and followed people for unequal lengths of time.
One particularly informative 22-year prospective follow-up study by Eddy and colleagues enrolled women originally diagnosed with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa under older diagnostic systems. At nine years, 31.4% of the anorexia nervosa group and 68.2% of the bulimia nervosa group met the study's recovery definition. At roughly 22 years, the corresponding figures were 62.8% and 68.2%. Approximately half of those with anorexia nervosa who were unrecovered at nine years subsequently recovered by the long-term assessment. These findings demonstrate that improvement can continue after many years and that a prolonged course does not make recovery impossible.
Those findings also have limitations. The cohort was female, recruited decades ago, and treated in historical clinical contexts; modern diagnostic criteria and available interventions differ. Its long follow-up does not imply that most patients must wait decades. The more recent transdiagnostic meta-analysis likewise reports substantial between-study heterogeneity and indicates that adolescents generally had more favorable observed outcomes than adults, without establishing a universal personal prognosis.
Recovery Timelines by Eating Disorder Diagnosis
Anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa
Anorexia nervosa treatment commonly begins with medically supervised nutritional rehabilitation and psychological treatment. Physical stabilization may be urgent, and improvements in vital signs or nutritional intake can precede relief from fear, rigidity, or body-related concerns. The pace of medical rehabilitation is individualized by the treatment team. The APA practice guideline and NICE NG69 recommend diagnosis-specific psychological interventions with medical and nutritional management when needed.
For adolescents, family-based treatment and related specialist family therapies are commonly delivered across months. NICE describes a family-therapy program for anorexia nervosa that typically involves 18–20 sessions across one year; individual adolescent-focused treatment may take longer. These are program descriptions rather than definitions of when complete recovery must occur. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of eating-disorder-focused family therapy evaluates outcomes and the variable quality and design of treatment studies. Some adolescents improve substantially during active treatment, but sustained follow-up remains valuable.
Atypical anorexia nervosa belongs within other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) in DSM-5-TR classification when the relevant criteria are met except for low-weight status. It can involve severe malnutrition and medical instability at a wide range of body sizes. The SAHM medical-management position paper explicitly warns that people with atypical anorexia can experience complications as severe as those seen in anorexia nervosa. Their recovery cannot be judged by appearance, BMI, or a presumption that a larger body makes restriction safe.
Bulimia nervosa
For adults with bulimia nervosa, established treatments include eating-disorder-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-ED) and guided self-help in appropriate circumstances. NICE NG69 describes an individual CBT-ED course of up to approximately 20 sessions over 20 weeks and specialist family therapy for children and adolescents across approximately six months. Such intervals characterize an initial intervention. Ongoing reduction of binge eating, compensatory behavior, distress, and relapse vulnerability can have a different timeline.
The Eddy et al. 22-year study observed that bulimia nervosa recovery commonly occurred earlier than anorexia nervosa recovery in that particular cohort, but the course varied. Symptom improvement during treatment should be followed by an assessment of stability, co-occurring conditions, medical consequences of purging, and a realistic plan for follow-up.
Binge eating disorder
In binge eating disorder (BED), the treatment target is recurrent binge episodes accompanied by loss of control and significant distress. CBT-ED, structured guided self-help, and selected other interventions have evidence for symptom reduction in adults. NICE describes group CBT-ED over about four months or individual treatment involving approximately 16–20 sessions. A person may experience fewer binge episodes before changes in shame, self-criticism, avoidance, or emotional functioning are firmly established.
Body-weight change is not an appropriate universal marker for BED remission, and weight loss is not the primary goal of eating-disorder-focused psychotherapy. Some individuals have a longstanding pattern of symptoms; others achieve substantial improvement during a first treatment course. Because follow-up measurements and definitions differ, evidence does not justify promising a fixed number of weeks to full psychological recovery.
Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID)
ARFID involves clinically significant avoidance or restriction of food without the defining body-shape or weight concerns of anorexia nervosa. Sensory characteristics of food, fear of harmful consequences of eating, and limited interest in eating may occur separately or together. Recovery may involve nutritional restoration, gradually greater dietary adequacy or flexibility, less fear, improved functioning, and resolution of complications. Goals are adapted to the person's presentation and co-occurring conditions, including neurodevelopmental differences.
In a prospective two-year study of 100 people aged 9–23, approximately half experienced persistence of their original full or subthreshold ARFID diagnosis across the observed period; the study also identified variation between presenting profiles. This is a cohort result, not a statement that ARFID always persists for two years. A scoping review of ARFID psychological treatment found promising intervention approaches alongside small samples, heterogeneous methods, and inconsistent outcome measures. Robust universal time-to-recovery estimates are not yet available.
OSFED, UFED, pica, rumination disorder, and emerging concepts
OSFED includes clinically significant presentations such as atypical anorexia nervosa, purging disorder, and certain subthreshold symptom patterns; UFED is used when a clinician does not specify the reason that diagnostic criteria are not fully met or information is insufficient. They deserve assessment and treatment based on their own medical and behavioral risks. A shorter checklist or a missing threshold never establishes that a presentation will resolve quickly. As NICE recommends, OSFED treatment can be based on the evidence-supported treatment for the disorder it most closely resembles.
Pica and rumination disorder require their own medical, developmental, and psychological assessment. Their course should not be extrapolated from anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa outcome studies. Orthorexia is a research and popular term for a proposed pattern of unhealthy fixation on dietary purity; it is not a separate DSM-5-TR eating-disorder diagnosis. A timeline for orthorexia recovery cannot be presented as a validated diagnosis-specific statistic.
Treatment Duration Is Different From Recovery Duration
An appointment schedule answers how long an intervention is planned to last. Remission describes improvement or absence of symptoms according to defined criteria. Recovery usually implies a broader, more sustained change in functioning and illness-related beliefs. A person may finish a prescribed course of therapy and benefit from maintenance visits or additional care; another may need a different treatment, more medical monitoring, or a higher level of support before returning to outpatient care.
The NICE treatment guideline specifies several practical schedules, including individual CBT-ED for bulimia nervosa over approximately 20 weeks, group CBT-ED for binge eating disorder over four months, and family therapy for adolescent anorexia nervosa across about a year. It also calls for ongoing assessment, adaptation, and relapse-prevention planning. These durations are best understood as clinical service designs with evidence behind them rather than milestones every patient should meet.
Residential care, partial hospitalization, intensive outpatient care, and standard outpatient treatment involve different levels of medical oversight and intensity. A short hospital stay may stabilize immediate physical danger without completing psychological recovery. Returning to lower-intensity care is a treatment transition, not necessarily a discharge from all support.
Common Phases of Recovery and What Changes First
Early engagement and safety assessment
Early work may include a diagnostic interview, a review of behaviors and distress, a medical assessment, laboratory tests or cardiovascular evaluation when clinically indicated, and a collaborative care plan. Treatment teams also evaluate barriers such as fear of change, shame, inaccessible services, and other mental health concerns. The AAP clinical report and SAHM guidance underscore the role of medical monitoring, especially for children and adolescents. Immediate priorities are set by clinical risk, not by how motivated someone appears.
Nutritional and behavioral stabilization
The next work often includes restoring reliable nourishment, reducing harmful eating-disorder behaviors, and establishing treatment routines. Recovery does not progress through an identical sequence for every diagnosis. Someone with restrictive malnutrition may need close medical monitoring during nutritional rehabilitation; someone with bulimia nervosa may need simultaneous work on binge episodes and purging; someone with ARFID may need a flexible, individually paced approach to feared or sensory-challenging foods. These are clinician-guided tasks; online self-directed refeeding or purging-management instructions cannot substitute for medical care.
Cognitive and emotional change
Changes in thoughts and feelings may follow, overlap with, or sometimes precede changes in behavior. People may work on fear, perfectionism, compulsive rules, intolerance of uncertainty, self-criticism, shame, and the use of food-related behaviors to manage emotion. In some diagnoses, body-image concerns remain important after outward behavior improves. For ARFID, specific sensory, fear-based, or interest-related mechanisms guide intervention instead. Progress can include tolerating distress without returning to illness-maintaining behaviors and participating in meaningful activities despite residual discomfort.
Reconnection and maintenance
Recovery becomes more resilient as eating and daily life become less organized around symptoms. Maintaining change during illness, exam periods, relationship stress, changes in routine, athletic training, pregnancy, or transitions in care can require additional planning. At this stage, periodic appointments may focus on recognizing early warning signs, keeping medical follow-up where indicated, and strengthening social support. Not every temporary increase in discomfort represents relapse, yet patterns of symptom return deserve a timely professional response.
What Can Affect How Long Recovery Takes?
Diagnosis and presentation matter, but they are only part of the picture. Duration and severity of symptoms, nutritional and medical complications, co-occurring anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms or substance problems, treatment acceptability, and access to appropriately trained clinicians can change the treatment path. Age, family or community support, social demands, finances, and continuity of care also influence what is feasible. These are clinical considerations rather than a formula that calculates recovery time.
Early recognition and treatment are important because complications can intensify and illness-maintaining routines can become entrenched. At the same time, the long-term Eddy cohort documents recovery after many years, while the Solmi synthesis demonstrates wide variability across samples. Neither finding permits a simple rule that long illness guarantees poor outcome or that a particular risk factor dictates an individual deadline.
Nutrition, emotional distress, and medical illness also interact. Restriction and malnutrition can affect concentration, mood, flexibility, and physical capacity; compensatory behaviors can cause electrolyte disturbances and cardiovascular risk. Such conditions can complicate psychological treatment and require parallel medical care. The APA guideline endorses coordinated assessment and treatment, and NICE advises collaboration among clinicians addressing physical and mental health conditions.
Why Physical Improvement and Psychological Recovery May Follow Different Timelines
A person may appear medically more stable while continuing to experience intense food-related anxiety or compulsive thinking. Conversely, someone may report reduced shame and greater motivation while significant medical risk remains. Both forms of progress deserve recognition, and both need assessment within the broader clinical picture. Visible change is not a complete recovery measure.
The Bardone-Cone validation study distinguished groups that met behavioral and physical research criteria from those who also met psychological research criteria. Participants meeting all three domains resembled controls more closely on a range of eating-disorder measures, illustrating the importance of asking about internal experiences as well as behavior. The study's operational cutoff, including its adult BMI threshold, was specific to its research design; it must not be used to judge people of different ages or body sizes or replace clinician assessment.
Does a Setback Mean Recovery Has Failed?
A setback may involve renewed distress, avoidance, rigid rules, binge eating, or a return to other symptoms. Clinicians distinguish isolated lapses, more persistent symptom recurrence, and a return to diagnostic criteria using the person's history and agreed clinical measures. There is no single universal relapse definition across all eating disorders or research studies. A setback deserves assessment of medical safety and of what support needs to change, especially if purging, marked restriction, or rapid physiological deterioration returns.
The most effective response is usually earlier contact with the treatment team, review of the established safety and support plan, and adjustment of treatment intensity where needed. Waiting until symptoms become severe can allow risks to accumulate. Planning for recurrence is included in the NICE treatment recommendations. For a focused discussion of recurrence rather than recovery duration, see Eating Disorder Relapse: Warning Signs and Prevention.
How Professionals Measure Recovery Over Time
Clinicians consider several sources of information: diagnostic interviews; relevant questionnaires; the reported frequency and impact of eating behaviors; nutritional and physiological status; laboratory and cardiac findings where appropriate; psychological distress; school or occupational functioning; and the person's goals and quality of life. Monitoring is tailored to the disorder and age. A screening questionnaire is a starting point for conversation, not a diagnosis or proof of remission. NICE NG69 explicitly advises against using screening instruments as the sole basis for diagnosing an eating disorder.
A person may also track personally meaningful outcomes with the care team, such as participating in meals with others, managing daily routines, maintaining the energy needed for learning, or feeling less controlled by fear. Such changes can complement clinical assessments. Treatment decisions should be based on shared professional evaluation rather than a weight chart or a self-reported score alone.
Medical Risks That Should Not Wait for a Recovery Milestone
Eating disorders can involve serious risks at any body size. Fainting, chest pain, palpitations, severe weakness, confusion, seizures, signs of marked dehydration, or other signs of acute illness warrant urgent medical assessment. Restriction, purging, and malnutrition can cause serious electrolyte abnormalities and cardiovascular complications, and rapid changes in weight or intake may be clinically significant even if weight remains in a range commonly considered typical. NICE NG69 recommends urgent medical care for severe dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, malnutrition, or signs of organ failure.
Nutritional rehabilitation after significant malnutrition needs appropriate clinical supervision because shifts in electrolytes and fluid balance can create medical hazards. A child or teenager may also have interrupted growth or development. SAHM and the AAP advise assessment based on medical signs and developmental history, with the level of care matched to severity. For immediate danger in the United States, call 911 or seek emergency care; for a suicidal crisis, call or text 988. The NIMH eating-disorders guidance explains these emergency routes. Outside the United States, use the appropriate local emergency or crisis service.
What Helps Recovery Remain Stable?
Sustained recovery is supported by diagnosis-appropriate treatment, continuity between medical and psychological care, a practical follow-up plan, and access to people who respond without judgment. The plan may address predictable triggers, ways to resume professional contact quickly if symptoms return, changes in medication when separately indicated, and treatment of co-occurring conditions. Family participation can be particularly important for young people when consistent with their developmental needs and clinical circumstances.
For anorexia nervosa in adolescents, specialist family approaches have substantial clinical support; for bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder, eating-disorder-focused CBT is well established; and for ARFID, promising approaches are developing within a more limited evidence base. The APA, NICE, Austin et al. review, and Willmott et al. ARFID review address these different treatment contexts. There is no single therapy, medication, or self-help exercise that can be assumed to work equally well across all disorders and ages.
Supporters can ask what kind of help is welcome, avoid comments about appearance and weight, encourage consistent professional follow-up, and take signs of medical instability seriously. A partner or parent does not need to become the clinician. For a separate guide to supporting another person, read How to Help Someone with an Eating Disorder: A Support Guide.
How to Think About Your Own Recovery Timeline
The most useful question for a treatment team is: What should improve next, what will we measure, and what do we do if it does not improve? A clinical plan can identify near-term medical safety goals, behavioral targets, psychological and functional goals, follow-up appointments, and a clear route to reassessment. Asking about expected variation and signs that a treatment needs adjustment is more informative than asking for a single date when recovery will be complete.
If you have completed treatment and still struggle, that experience merits a new evaluation rather than a conclusion that recovery has become impossible. If symptoms return after a stable period, the care team can review recurrence, emerging medical needs, and whether the existing approach remains appropriate. A long-standing illness may require sustained, specialist, sometimes multidisciplinary care; people can still achieve significant changes in health, functioning, and quality of life.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can an eating disorder be cured in three months?
Some people improve substantially within three months, especially on specific behavioral targets, but three months is not an established universal deadline for full recovery. Clinical trials and treatment programs measure selected symptoms over fixed intervals; sustained physical, psychological, and functional recovery requires individualized assessment.
Is six months enough for eating disorder recovery?
Six months may cover an initial treatment program for some diagnoses and age groups. NICE describes several interventions lasting approximately four to six months, but completion of sessions and stable long-term recovery are different outcomes. Follow-up may be needed after a successful initial course.
Why does anorexia recovery sometimes take years?
Anorexia nervosa can affect physical functioning, fear responses, thought patterns, and daily behavior at the same time. Nutritional rehabilitation, treatment of psychological symptoms, and adaptation to ordinary life may progress at different speeds. Long-term observational studies show that people can continue recovering over many years, though individual trajectories vary greatly.
Can people recover after ten years of an eating disorder?
Yes. The 22-year follow-up study documented late recovery among people with anorexia nervosa who had not recovered at nine years. This evidence supports continued access to appropriate care without promising that every individual will follow the same path.
When do food thoughts and body-image fears get better?
These experiences may soften during nutritional and behavioral treatment or need focused psychotherapy and further time. Their importance varies by diagnosis: body-image fear is central to some disorders and not a defining ARFID feature. A team should assess the distress and its effect on functioning rather than assume that normal-looking meals mean all cognitive symptoms have resolved.
Does weight restoration mean recovery is complete?
Weight or growth restoration can be medically essential in restrictive illness, but it does not establish full psychological recovery. Conversely, a person can have a dangerous eating disorder while living in a larger body. Medical safety, behaviors, cognition, and functioning all matter, as emphasized by SAHM.
Does binge eating disorder usually improve faster than anorexia?
Some evidence-based treatments for binge eating disorder are delivered over a shorter initial course than specialist adolescent anorexia treatment, but comparing program lengths cannot establish which illness is universally quicker to recover from. Different studies use different definitions, populations, and follow-up intervals. A person's treatment response and functional recovery must be evaluated individually.
Is recovery supposed to be linear?
Recovery often fluctuates. Progress can coexist with persistent anxiety or occasional symptom increases. Because recurrence may have medical consequences, it should be discussed with professionals rather than automatically dismissed as a normal stage. An individualized relapse-prevention plan helps identify when to seek reassessment.
Does treatment need to continue forever?
Most people do not need the same intensity of care indefinitely. Treatment commonly changes from acute stabilization to outpatient psychotherapy, follow-up monitoring, and maintenance support as clinically appropriate. The schedule depends on risks, response, and preferences; treatment completion is a shared clinical decision.
How do I know if I am making real progress?
Progress may include safer physical functioning, more adequate or flexible eating, fewer harmful behaviors, reduced distress, and greater engagement with important activities. The appropriate markers vary by diagnosis. Review progress with a qualified professional using relevant clinical measures and your lived experience; do not rely on a screening score, body size, or an online timeline alone.
Related Articles
Eating Disorder Recovery: Stages, Challenges, and Support provides a broader explanation of multidimensional recovery. Eating Disorder Relapse: Warning Signs and Prevention covers symptom recurrence and continuing-care plans. Family-Based Treatment (FBT) for Adolescent Eating Disorders explains a diagnosis- and age-specific treatment pathway. How to Help Someone with an Eating Disorder: A Support Guide addresses support from family members and other people close to the patient.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2023). Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders, fourth edition. Official guideline.
Austin, A., et al. (2025). Efficacy of eating disorder focused family therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 58(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24252.
Bardone-Cone, A. M., et al. (2010). Defining recovery from an eating disorder: Conceptualization, validation, and examination of psychosocial functioning and psychiatric comorbidity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.001.
Eddy, K. T., et al. (2017). Recovery from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa at 22-year follow-up. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 78(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.15m10393.
Golden, N. H., et al.; Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2022). Medical management of restrictive eating disorders in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 71(5), 648–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.006.
Hornberger, L. L., Lane, M. A., & Committee on Adolescence. (2021). Identification and management of eating disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 147(1), e2020040279. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-040279.
Kambanis, P. E., et al. (2025). Prospective 2-year course and predictors of outcome in avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 64(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.04.010.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017; updated). Eating disorders: Recognition and treatment (NG69). Official recommendations.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Eating disorders: What you need to know. Official publication.
Solmi, M., et al. (2024). Outcomes in people with eating disorders: A transdiagnostic and disorder-specific systematic review, meta-analysis and multivariable meta-regression analysis. World Psychiatry, 23(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21182.
Willmott, E., et al. (2024). A scoping review of psychological interventions and outcomes for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). International Journal of Eating Disorders, 57(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24073.