Eating Disorder Recovery: Stages, Challenges, and Support

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Eating Disorders & Disordered Eating · Written by Artificial Sapiens

Eating disorder recovery is the process of restoring physical health, changing eating-disorder behaviors and the psychological patterns that maintain them, and rebuilding a life in which food, body-related fear, or compulsive routines no longer dominate daily decisions. Recovery involves medical and nutritional care where needed, evidence-based psychological treatment, relationships, and support over time. It can occur after anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED), and other clinically assessed feeding and eating disorders. The particular treatment goals vary with the diagnosis, age, medical condition, and personal circumstances.

Recovery often progresses unevenly. Some physical changes become measurable before cognitive or emotional relief is established; psychological progress can also occur while nutritional rehabilitation remains incomplete. A return of symptoms deserves prompt attention and a review of the care plan. The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline and NICE guideline NG69 emphasize coordinated assessment, diagnosis-specific treatment, physical monitoring, and planning for continued care.

What Does Recovery From an Eating Disorder Mean?

A narrow definition of recovery might ask whether diagnostic criteria are still met or whether particular behaviors have stopped. A fuller clinical and personal account considers physical safety, sufficient nutrition, freedom from compulsive or avoidant behaviors, reduced distress, restored functioning, and the ability to sustain progress beyond intensive treatment. Remission is generally a reduction or absence of defined symptoms over a specified period; recovery has a broader and sometimes longer-term meaning. Researchers use different operational definitions, so identical labels do not always represent identical outcomes across studies.

A systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis by de Vos and colleagues identified self-acceptance, autonomy, resilience, positive relationships, and personal growth as important components of recovery described by people with lived experience. A separate systematic qualitative synthesis by Wetzler and colleagues similarly showed that personal recovery encompasses connection, identity, hope, meaning, and empowerment. These perspectives add dimensions to symptom assessment; they do not replace medically necessary evaluation or diagnosis-specific clinical targets.

Five interrelated dimensions of recovery

Physical recovery concerns medical stability and repair of nutritional or other physiological harm. Behavioral recovery concerns changes in restriction, binge eating, purging, compensatory exercise, food avoidance, and other behaviors relevant to the diagnosed condition. Cognitive and emotional recovery includes decreasing rigid rules, body-related distress when applicable, fear of eating, shame, and habitual reliance on eating-disorder behaviors for emotional regulation. Social recovery includes participation in relationships, education, work, and shared activities. Personal recovery concerns agency, meaning, and a sense of self that can develop outside the illness.

These dimensions may improve at different rates. A person may have stopped an immediately dangerous behavior but still face intrusive thoughts, or may have become socially engaged again while requiring ongoing medical checks. Someone with ARFID may chiefly be recovering nutritional adequacy, flexibility, and freedom from sensory or fear-based restriction without the weight-shape concerns prominent in some other disorders. The treatment team should describe which dimensions are currently impaired and what meaningful change would look like for that individual.

Are There Recognized Stages of Eating Disorder Recovery?

There is no single scientifically validated sequence of recovery stages that reliably applies to every eating disorder or every person. A 2024 systematic scoping review of staging models identified nine proposed models across eleven studies, most focused on anorexia nervosa; few had been empirically tested. Popular descriptions such as early, middle, and late recovery can be helpful organizing language, but they should not be mistaken for standardized diagnostic stages or fixed milestones.

For practical understanding, clinicians and patients can organize recovery into overlapping areas of work: engagement and assessment; medical and nutritional stabilization; active behavioral change; psychological and social rebuilding; and consolidation with continuing support. People may revisit any area as circumstances or medical needs change. These are descriptive care tasks, not a predictive timetable or a clinical staging instrument.

1. Engagement, recognition, and comprehensive assessment

Recovery often begins with a conversation about what is happening, what feels frightening or useful about the eating-disorder behaviors, and what support is acceptable or necessary. Ambivalence is common because those behaviors can become tied to routine, identity, coping, or perceived safety. Effective engagement combines clear information about medical risk with collaborative goal-setting. Families or trusted people may help someone access care, especially when malnutrition, secrecy, shame, or impaired recognition of illness makes asking for help difficult.

Initial assessment should cover eating patterns and their changes, restrictive or compensatory behaviors, binge episodes or loss of control, relevant fears, physical symptoms, psychiatric comorbidity, medications, growth or weight history where appropriate, and the person’s social environment. Clinicians also assess vital signs and other medical indicators when indicated. Screening questionnaires can suggest a need for further evaluation but cannot independently establish a diagnosis or medical safety; NICE explicitly warns against using screening tools alone.

2. Medical stabilization and nutrition rehabilitation

When inadequate intake, dehydration, purging, or other complications endanger physical health, treatment first addresses safety. Clinically supervised nutritional rehabilitation may be necessary to reverse malnutrition or deficiencies, restore growth where relevant, and support cardiac, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and cognitive functioning. Nutritional goals are individualized by clinicians and dietitians who understand the specific disorder and medical context. Severe malnutrition can make nutritional restoration medically complex, including risk of refeeding-related electrolyte shifts, so an improvised self-directed plan is inappropriate for a medically unstable person.

Medical severity cannot be read from appearance or body mass index alone. Rapid changes in intake or weight, suppressed growth, unstable vital signs, and electrolyte disturbance may matter at many body sizes. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine position paper recognizes that adolescents and young adults with atypical anorexia and ARFID can have complications comparable to those seen with anorexia nervosa. Stabilization may require outpatient monitoring, a higher level of care, or hospital treatment depending on the clinical picture.

3. Building sustainable behavioral change

As safety permits, treatment targets the patterns maintaining the disorder. That can involve establishing consistent nourishment under professional guidance; reducing binge, purging, or compensatory behaviors; addressing avoidance; and gradually restoring flexibility and participation in daily situations. Specific techniques depend on diagnosis. Someone recovering from bulimia may need to disrupt cycles of restriction and compensatory behavior, while an individual with ARFID may work with clinicians on an adequate and more flexible food repertoire and, when appropriate, carefully guided exposure to feared sensations or foods.

Behavioral changes can produce anxiety even when they are medically helpful. That anxiety is one reason a coordinated treatment plan matters: therapy can address the meanings and fears attached to change, while nutritional and medical specialists monitor physiological needs. Recovery should be evaluated by function and safety as well as adherence to treatment tasks; a person does not need to appear confident at every meal to be making meaningful progress.

4. Psychological, relational, and functional recovery

Later work often expands to beliefs about self-worth, perfectionism, uncertainty, shame, trauma-related symptoms where present, interpersonal conflict, and the role the disorder has played in managing difficult emotions. Treatment may also address co-occurring depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, or substance use with clinicians coordinating how care is sequenced. Addressing these issues can begin early, although medical instability sometimes limits how fully the person can participate in demanding psychological work.

Returning to school, work, family meals, friendships, hobbies, sport, and ordinary social life is a meaningful goal when it can be done safely. Someone may need accommodations during treatment, especially for medical appointments, supervised meals, school transitions, or fatigue. Personal recovery can include finding ways of describing one’s identity that are no longer organized around the eating disorder. The lived-experience research by Wetzler and colleagues supports including these broader dimensions in clinical conversations.

5. Consolidation, follow-up, and relapse planning

As symptoms decrease and daily life expands, the focus shifts toward sustaining gains and identifying early warning signs. Follow-up may involve periodic review of nutritional adequacy, medical indicators, mental health, behavior changes, and stressors. Discharge from intensive treatment should lead to a concrete plan for continuity rather than an assumption that care is no longer useful. NICE recommends relapse-prevention and end-of-treatment support planning across several diagnosis-specific therapies and warns against discharge from inpatient care solely because a weight target has been reached.

How Long Does Eating Disorder Recovery Take?

There is no universal number of weeks, months, or years. Treatment courses differ across anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, ARFID, and other presentations, and the pace depends on duration of illness, degree of medical compromise, access to appropriate care, age, comorbid conditions, and the particular definition of recovery. A planned course of psychotherapy is a treatment schedule, not a guaranteed completion date for recovery. Continuing care after an initial intervention is sometimes clinically appropriate.

A major 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis by Solmi and colleagues combined 415 studies involving 88,372 participants. Across heterogeneous studies, the pooled proportion classified as recovered increased with longer follow-up. However, outcome definitions, sample characteristics, diagnoses, and study quality varied substantially, so these pooled figures cannot predict an individual’s prognosis. In addition, only a minority of included observational studies were rated high quality; long-term outcome statistics require careful interpretation.

An important practical distinction is between early improvement and durable recovery. An initial reduction in a symptom may be followed by significant cognitive distress, medical concerns, or vulnerability during life transitions. Conversely, needing a longer course of support does not establish that someone is incapable of recovery. A useful review asks which domains are improving, which remain impaired, what treatment is available, and whether care is being adapted when progress stalls.

How Recovery Differs by Eating Disorder

Anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa

For anorexia nervosa, nutritional rehabilitation and restoration of medical safety are central alongside eating-disorder-focused psychotherapy. People may also need help with anxiety about changing behaviors, obsessive preoccupation, and the consequences of prolonged malnutrition. Atypical anorexia nervosa is classified under OSFED when the characteristic psychopathology is present without meeting the low-weight criterion for anorexia nervosa. It can still involve substantial medical instability; clinicians assess recent changes, physiology, nutritional status, and functioning instead of dismissing risk based on size. The SAHM consensus directly addresses these distinctions.

Bulimia nervosa

Recovery from bulimia nervosa includes stopping recurrent binge-eating and compensatory behaviors, stabilizing eating patterns, and addressing dietary restraint, distress, and the psychological processes maintaining the cycle. Medical assessment is important when purging may have affected electrolyte balance, dental or gastrointestinal health, or cardiac function. For adults, eating-disorder-focused cognitive behavioral therapy is an established evidence-based option. A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis found CBT superior to waitlist controls for remission and binge-eating frequency in bulimia and binge eating disorder, with more qualified findings against active or self-help comparators.

Binge eating disorder

Recovery from binge eating disorder centers on reduced episodes of binge eating and loss of control, improved emotional and behavioral functioning, and a less distressing relationship with food. Treatment need not be organized around weight loss. For many people, restrictive dieting can intensify the cycle being treated; NICE advises against trying to lose weight by dieting during binge eating disorder treatment. Psychological therapies, including CBT-based approaches, have stronger evidence for core binge-eating outcomes than advice to pursue a particular appearance or weight.

ARFID, OSFED, and other feeding or eating disorders

ARFID involves restriction or avoidance associated with clinically significant nutritional, physical, or psychosocial consequences, without the characteristic weight-shape motivation that defines some other disorders. Recovery may target adequate intake, nutritional deficiencies, sensory-related limitations, low interest in eating, or fear of aversive consequences. The 2024 review in Focus describes developing treatment approaches but notes that disorder-specific trial evidence remains comparatively early. For OSFED, treatment is based on the clinically relevant presentation and the most appropriate evidence-based model; NICE recommends considering treatments used for the disorder the presentation most closely resembles. Pica and rumination disorder require their own differential assessment and tailored care.

What Treatments Support Recovery?

Good treatment links clinical assessment, a diagnosis-specific psychological approach, medically indicated monitoring, and nutritional expertise when appropriate. The composition of the team can change with severity and treatment setting. Primary care, eating-disorder specialists, psychotherapists, dietitians, psychiatrists, pediatricians, and family members may each have a defined role. In severe illness, hospital or residential care may be needed; when medically safe, outpatient care is often a central setting for longer-term recovery. Treatment selection should follow an individualized plan rather than an assumption that every eating disorder responds to the same technique.

Eating-disorder-focused psychotherapy

Cognitive behavioral therapy focused on eating disorders (CBT-ED, including enhanced forms in some settings) has substantial research support for bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder and is one of the options for adults with anorexia nervosa. A 2024 meta-analysis of 36 trials examined outcomes for adults with diagnosed eating disorders and found a stronger research base in binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa than in anorexia nervosa. Evidence for a method in one diagnosis should not be automatically transferred to ARFID, pica, or rumination disorder.

For children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa, family-involved approaches are important. In a systematic review and meta-analysis of adolescent-focused family therapy, family-oriented treatment showed advantages on some physical recovery outcomes compared with individual therapies, although outcomes vary and no single approach works for every family. NICE recommends anorexia-nervosa-focused family therapy as an important option for young people and emphasizes parent or caregiver collaboration without blame. Medication may help certain disorders or comorbid symptoms when prescribed for an appropriate indication, but it is not a universal substitute for psychological, nutritional, and medical care.

Nutritional and medical care

A specialist dietitian can help translate clinical nutritional goals into a sustainable pattern appropriate to diagnosis, age, growth, cultural context, medical needs, and practical circumstances. A medical clinician evaluates complications and determines whether laboratory tests, electrocardiography, or more frequent observations are needed. If a person is experiencing marked restriction, medical instability, or complications of purging, treatment should avoid unsupervised experimentation with restoration plans. The APA guideline and NICE monitoring recommendations support coordinated, continuing assessment.

Choosing a level of care

The level of care depends on immediate medical and psychiatric safety, capacity to meet nutritional needs, the degree of behavioral impairment, available support, and response to outpatient treatment. A clinician may recommend outpatient appointments, structured day treatment, residential care, or hospital treatment. Transitions between levels of care require a plan so that changes in supervision and intensity do not create gaps. Higher-intensity treatment can provide stabilization without completing every psychological aspect of recovery; outpatient follow-up is therefore often consequential.

Common Challenges During Eating Disorder Recovery

Ambivalence, fear, and distress during change

Eating-disorder behaviors may offer a perceived sense of control or temporary relief from distress, making change emotionally complicated even when the harms are recognized. Eating more regularly, accepting support, or discontinuing compensatory rituals can intensify anxiety in the short term. Psychotherapy can help identify these maintaining processes, strengthen motivation, and develop alternative ways of responding to fear, uncertainty, or difficult emotions. Progress is usually more sustainable when the team addresses the function a behavior has served rather than focusing only on stopping it.

Body-related distress and social comparison

For people whose symptoms include overvaluation of weight or shape, body-related thoughts may remain intrusive after eating behavior has changed. Recovery work can include reducing checking or avoidance patterns and developing a broader basis for self-evaluation. Social media and appearance-focused environments may complicate this process for some individuals; others find online communities supportive. The impact should be assessed individually, without treating everyone’s response to digital media as identical. Our English Hub discussion of social media and body image covers these influences in greater depth.

Shame, stigma, and barriers to treatment

Shame can delay disclosure and make setbacks harder to discuss. Some people encounter dismissive attitudes because they do not match cultural stereotypes about how an eating disorder should look. A 2024 systematic review on perceived clinician stigma identified associations with treatment engagement and therapeutic alliance across eleven qualitative studies, while recognizing the limits of the underlying evidence. Respectful, weight-inclusive assessment and language that does not equate appearance with severity are important features of care.

Co-occurring conditions, trauma, neurodevelopment, and life transitions

Depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, substance misuse, and trauma-related difficulties may coexist with an eating disorder and affect functioning or treatment participation. Neurodevelopmental differences may alter communication preferences, sensory needs, and how treatment tasks should be delivered, particularly in ARFID. Starting college, changing jobs, moving, recovering from another illness, pregnancy, or changes in family life can disrupt support routines. Plans are more useful when they anticipate such transitions and coordinate care among clinicians who treat different conditions.

How to Recognize Progress Without Reducing Recovery to a Number

Progress is assessed through a combination of clinical observation, physical findings, behavioral changes, patient-reported experience, and functioning. Depending on the disorder and medical circumstances, clinicians may monitor nutritional adequacy, growth trajectories, laboratory or cardiac findings, eating-disorder symptom frequency, distress, avoidance, and psychiatric symptoms. They may use validated interviews and standardized measures to track change over time. A screening score is not an independent diagnosis, and a single normal laboratory result or weight measurement does not establish safety or recovery.

Signs of meaningful improvement can include more predictable nourishment, fewer episodes of dangerous behavior, increasing flexibility around food, a reduced need to hide symptoms, better concentration or energy as health recovers, greater engagement with relationships, and increased confidence in seeking help promptly. These examples are not a self-certification checklist. The clinical question is whether the person is becoming medically safer and more able to live according to their own goals, with a plan for remaining vulnerabilities.

Relapse, Lapses, and Continuing Recovery

A lapse is often used informally to describe a brief return of an old behavior; relapse generally refers to more sustained or clinically meaningful re-emergence of symptoms after improvement. Definitions differ among research studies and clinical services. A 2025 qualitative systematic review by Heal-Cohen and colleagues described relapse as a complex experience tied to perceived protection, loss of control, shame, and learning. Its evidence predominantly reflects female participants with anorexia or bulimia in a few high-income countries, which limits extrapolation to all diagnoses and populations.

A helpful relapse-prevention plan records personally relevant early changes: renewed restriction or avoidance, escalating body-related rituals where relevant, secrecy, return of purging or binge episodes, social withdrawal, or inability to maintain nutritional and medical care. It also identifies whom to contact, how soon a follow-up is needed, and which transitions or stressors increase vulnerability. If symptoms recur, the plan should be activated promptly and revised with the treating team. Recurrent symptoms are information about treatment needs, not grounds for blame.

Relapse prevention extends beyond spotting behaviors. Clinical follow-up may address unresolved beliefs, emotional triggers, comorbid symptoms, interpersonal stress, and access to practical support. For young people, the level of family involvement should evolve with developmental needs while protecting medical safety. NICE explicitly includes relapse planning in several eating-disorder treatment pathways.

How Families, Partners, and Friends Can Help

Supportive people can make treatment more accessible by listening calmly, encouraging professional evaluation, helping with appointments when wanted, and following the care team’s guidance around meals or other routines. Useful communication focuses on concern and observed changes rather than judgments about weight or appearance. Ask what kind of support is welcome, while recognizing that serious medical risk may require urgent action even if the affected person is hesitant. In minors, caregivers often have a larger active role in treatment and medical coordination.

Friends and partners can help preserve ordinary relationships and meaningful activities, respect privacy, and avoid making food, body size, or appearance the constant subject of conversation. Caregivers also need realistic support and information for themselves. NICE recommends assessing families’ needs and involving appropriate supports, and the National Institute of Mental Health emphasizes the role family members can play in encouraging care. Support works best when it is consistent with the individual treatment plan rather than improvised surveillance or confrontation.

Recovery in Everyday Life

Recovery work continues outside appointments. Meals with other people, restaurants, school schedules, social events, changes to exercise routines, and online content may require gradual adaptation. When clinical supervision is needed, the team can help decide which activities are safe and how to approach them. People may benefit from a consistent network of professionals and trusted contacts who know what to do if symptoms or medical concerns increase. Expectations can be adjusted during exams, travel, changes in employment, or moves between care services.

A sustainable recovery plan can include practical access to appointments, continuity of prescribed medication where appropriate, support for co-occurring conditions, opportunities for rest and social participation, and clear arrangements for clinical check-ins. Personal goals such as returning to study, enjoying relationships, or resuming interests can give treatment meaning beyond symptom counts. Recovery-oriented planning should respect age, disability, cultural eating practices, finances, gender identity, and barriers to specialized care.

When Is Medical or Crisis Help Urgent?

Eating disorders can cause medical emergencies even when a person’s body size does not appear alarming. Seek immediate medical evaluation for fainting or collapse, chest pain, concerning heart rhythm symptoms, severe weakness or confusion, significant dehydration, uncontrolled vomiting, blood in vomit, or signs of serious electrolyte disturbance. Severe restriction or rapid deterioration also warrants urgent assessment, and people with suicidal thoughts, a plan for self-harm, or inability to remain safe require emergency or crisis support. In the United States, call 911 for a medical emergency; call or text 988 for suicide or mental health crisis support.

Clinicians determine whether blood tests, heart monitoring, hospitalization, or monitored nutrition rehabilitation is necessary. NICE recommends acute medical care when severe malnutrition, dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, or impending organ failure is present. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine also emphasizes individualized assessment of adolescents and young adults with restrictive disorders. This article is educational information and does not substitute for an examination or personalized treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can you fully recover from an eating disorder?

Yes. Many people experience substantial and sustained recovery. The precise meaning of full recovery differs among studies, and outcomes vary by diagnosis and individual circumstances. Treatment can improve physical health, behavior, psychological distress, and daily functioning. Solmi and colleagues’ meta-analysis documents substantial recovery over long follow-up while emphasizing heterogeneity and methodological limitations.

Is eating disorder recovery linear?

Usually it is more useful to expect variable progress than a fixed straight line. Physical, behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and social changes can proceed at different rates. Returning to an area of difficulty should lead to renewed assessment and adjustments in support.

What is the hardest stage of recovery?

There is no evidence-based ranking of a single hardest stage. Medical stabilization, changes in long-established behaviors, fear of food or body changes, social reintegration, and maintaining progress after discharge can each be especially difficult for different people. The treatment plan should respond to the individual’s actual barriers.

Can someone be recovering while still having eating-disorder thoughts?

Yes. The frequency and intensity of thoughts may decline more slowly than observable behaviors. Clinicians still take persistent preoccupation, distress, and avoidance seriously because they can affect functioning and risk. Continuing psychological work is appropriate when clinically indicated.

Is weight restoration the same as recovery?

No single weight measurement defines recovery. For people whose illness involves malnutrition or growth suppression, restoring adequate nourishment and a medically appropriate trajectory may be essential. Clinical recovery also addresses symptoms, mental health, behavior, and functioning. People at higher body weights can experience serious eating disorders and medical complications.

What if eating disorder symptoms return after treatment?

Contact the clinician or service involved in care as soon as possible, or seek a new evaluation if treatment has ended. Describe the changes and any physical symptoms. A revised plan may include medical monitoring, therapy, family support, or a different level of care. Seek emergency assessment when the warning signs above are present.

Can someone recover without inpatient treatment?

Yes, many people receive treatment outside a hospital when medically safe. The appropriate setting depends on physical and psychiatric risk, functioning, available support, and response to treatment. Inpatient care is sometimes necessary for stabilization, but a hospital admission is neither universal nor a complete measure of recovery.

Are recovery stages different for teenagers and adults?

Development matters. Children and adolescents may need growth-sensitive assessment, stronger caregiver involvement, school accommodations, and supported transitions toward age-appropriate independence. Adults may have different demands involving employment, caregiving, financial constraints, and long-established symptoms. The diagnosis and individual medical situation remain decisive.

How can I support someone without becoming their therapist?

Offer consistent concern, encourage professional help, ask how to assist with practical barriers, follow agreed clinical guidance, and keep ordinary connections alive. Avoid trying to diagnose, supervise treatment without guidance, or bargain over symptoms. You may also need advice and support for your own well-being.

Related Articles

Social Media and Body Image: Appearance Comparison, Ideals, and Mental Health examines social comparison and appearance pressures that can be relevant to body-related distress during recovery.

Social Comparison on Social Media: Mental Health, Body Image, and Self-Evaluation explores comparison processes that may affect self-evaluation and recovery environments.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2023). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.23180001.

Austin, A., et al. (2025). Efficacy of eating disorder focused family therapy for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 58(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24252.

Cuijpers, P., Harrer, M., Miguel, C., Keshen, A., Karyotaki, E., & Linardon, J. (2025). Absolute and relative outcomes of cognitive behavior therapy for eating disorders in adults: A meta-analysis. Eating Disorders, 33(6), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2024.2421057.

de Vos, J. A., LaMarre, A., Radstaak, M., et al. (2017). Identifying fundamental criteria for eating disorder recovery: A systematic review and qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-017-0164-0.

Heal-Cohen, N., Allan, S. M., Gauvain, N., et al. (2025). Relapse in eating disorders: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of individuals’ experiences. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 32(4), e70101. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.70101.

Lubieniecki, G., Fernando, A. N., Randhawa, A., Cowlishaw, S., & Sharp, G. (2024). Perceived clinician stigma and its impact on eating disorder treatment experiences: A systematic review of the lived experience literature. Journal of Eating Disorders, 12, 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01128-3.

Menzel, J. E., & Perry, T. R. (2024). Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Review and recent advances. Focus, 22(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20240008.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017). Eating disorders: Recognition and treatment (NG69). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng69/chapter/recommendations.

National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Eating disorders: What you need to know. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/eating-disorders.

Sioziou, A. L., et al. (2026). Cognitive behavioural therapy compared to control conditions in treating bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70070.

Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2022). Medical management of restrictive eating disorders in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 71(5), 648–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.006.

Solmi, M., et al. (2024). Outcomes in people with eating disorders: A transdiagnostic and disorder-specific systematic review, meta-analysis and multivariable meta-regression analysis. World Psychiatry, 23(1), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21182.

Tomba, E., et al. (2024). Staging models in eating disorders: A systematic scoping review of the literature. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 131, 152468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152468.

Wetzler, S., Hackmann, C., Peryer, G., et al. (2020). A framework to conceptualize personal recovery from eating disorders: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of perspectives from individuals with lived experience. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(8), 1188–1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23260.