Narcissistic Personality Disorder in Relationships: Clinical Context
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 13, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) can affect the ways a person experiences closeness, responds to criticism, recognizes a partner’s needs, and manages conflict. The clinical issue is a persistent disturbance in personality and interpersonal functioning. It is possible to have narcissistic traits without NPD, to have NPD without fitting a familiar internet stereotype, and to experience a harmful relationship without either partner having a personality disorder. These distinctions matter when someone is trying to understand a difficult marriage, dating relationship, breakup, or family dynamic.
This guide explains what NPD can mean within intimate relationships, what research actually finds about narcissism and romantic functioning, how to recognize a relationship concern without diagnosing another person, and what treatment, boundaries, and safety planning can accomplish. For the formal diagnostic criteria and broader treatment overview, see Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
What Does Narcissistic Personality Disorder Mean in a Relationship?
NPD is a recognized diagnosis in the American Psychiatric Association’s DSM-5-TR. It involves a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, a need for admiration, and impaired empathy, with a persistent impact across contexts rather than an isolated argument or a particular style of romance. A person may struggle with self-esteem regulation, entitlement, recognition of other people’s independent perspectives, or sustaining relationships that require mutuality. Narcissistic presentations can also include shame, insecurity, withdrawal, and pronounced sensitivity to criticism. The American Psychiatric Association’s clinical overview and Weinberg and Ronningstam’s review describe this complexity.
Relationships matter clinically because personality functioning develops and operates in interaction with other people. Partners negotiate attention, affection, vulnerability, limits, sexuality, shared responsibilities, conflict, and repair after mistakes. A person with significant narcissistic pathology may experience some of these ordinary demands as threats to status, autonomy, self-image, or psychological stability. This is a possible clinical mechanism, and its importance varies widely from person to person.
A diagnosis describes a pattern of impairment in the individual being assessed. It provides neither a verdict about a partner’s moral character nor an explanation for every event within a relationship. The task for someone affected by recurring conflict is to understand observable behavior, its impact, and the available options for support.
Trait, symptom, clinical diagnosis, and harmful behavior
A narcissistic trait is a characteristic or tendency, such as enjoying recognition or being highly concerned with social standing. A maladaptive trait is expressed in a way that interferes with functioning or damages relationships. A symptom is a clinically relevant experience or manifestation that may contribute to assessment. A screening score is information from a particular measurement instrument. NPD is a clinical diagnosis established by qualified assessment of persistence, pervasiveness, context, and impairment.
These concepts cannot be substituted for one another. A person who interrupts, is arrogant, becomes jealous, or refuses to apologize may be behaving poorly, yet those actions alone do not establish NPD. Equally, a person may experience serious psychological harm from a partner whose behavior never meets a psychiatric diagnostic threshold. For a broader explanation of how diagnoses are determined, see How Are Personality Disorders Diagnosed? The Clinical Assessment Process.
How NPD Can Affect Intimacy, Trust, and Mutuality
Attention, admiration, and self-esteem regulation
In intimate relationships, admiration can become closely tied to the regulation of self-esteem. A partner’s appreciation may bring comfort and connection, but a strong dependence on external affirmation can make routine disagreements feel unusually consequential. The clinical literature describes self-esteem dysregulation, interpersonal sensitivity, and oscillation between grandiose and vulnerable experiences as relevant processes in NPD; these are clinical formulations rather than a fixed script for every couple (Weinberg & Ronningstam).
For example, one partner might experience a neutral observation—“We need to change how we divide the chores”—as a humiliating criticism and respond defensively. Another person with similar traits might withdraw, appear cold, or become preoccupied with rejection. The same outward behavior may also arise from stress, trauma, depression, or ordinary relational conflict. Repeated patterns and the person’s broader functioning give the behavior meaning.
Empathy and recognizing a partner’s experience
Empathy includes distinguishable capacities: understanding what someone else thinks or feels, emotionally responding to their experience, and choosing to behave with consideration. People with NPD can show impairments in these domains, yet the evidence does not support a universal claim that they are incapable of empathy. Empathic functioning may vary across people and situations, and motivation or emotional arousal may influence it. A clinical review by Baskin-Sommers, Krusemark, and Ronningstam and an empirical investigation by Ritter and colleagues describe differences between cognitive and emotional empathy.
Within a relationship, empathy difficulties can appear when a partner accurately perceives distress but is unable or unwilling to respond supportively in a difficult moment. They can also appear as persistent misreading of someone else’s needs or interpreting a partner’s independence only in relation to one’s own self-image. What matters for the relationship is whether the person can recognize the impact, take responsibility, and work toward more reliable care.
Criticism, shame, disagreement, and conflict repair
Constructive relationships depend on the ability to disagree while respecting both people’s experience. Narcissistic vulnerability may make criticism particularly painful; defensive counterattacks, blame, contempt, or disengagement may follow in some cases. Clinicians consider such patterns alongside sensitivity to humiliation, anger regulation, self-esteem, and interpersonal expectations. No single response is diagnostic.
Conflict repair is more informative than a dramatic apology alone. The relevant questions are whether the person acknowledges the behavior, responds to the harm done, changes the pattern over time, respects a stated boundary, and can tolerate accountability without requiring the other person to suppress legitimate needs. These principles are useful in any relationship, whatever the diagnosis.
Closeness, independence, jealousy, and control
Difficulties with intimacy may involve competing desires for affirmation and independence. Some individuals seek closeness while struggling to tolerate a partner’s separate wishes, relationships, or goals. Others distance themselves when emotional vulnerability increases. Attachment history may be clinically relevant, but an attachment label such as “avoidant” or “anxious” is neither equivalent to NPD nor an explanation for coercive behavior. The published Hub article on avoidant attachment style addresses the attachment construct independently.
Jealousy and control need their own assessment. Checking devices without consent, isolating someone from friends, monitoring finances, threatening consequences for leaving, or using intimidation are behaviors with direct effects on autonomy and safety. They deserve attention on their own terms rather than being excused as manifestations of a disorder.
Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism in Romantic Relationships
Grandiose narcissism typically involves conspicuous self-enhancement, entitlement, dominance, or assertive status-seeking. Vulnerable narcissism is associated more closely with insecurity, shame, social sensitivity, withdrawal, and defensive reactions to perceived rejection. These dimensions are research and clinical constructs; they are not two separate official DSM-5-TR NPD diagnoses. A person with clinically significant narcissistic pathology may display elements of both. An individual-participant meta-analysis by Jauk and colleagues supports a more complex relationship between grandiosity and vulnerability than a strict either/or division.
These patterns can shape intimate interactions differently. Overt entitlement might be experienced as pressure for special treatment; strong vulnerability may create repeated cycles of perceived slight, resentment, retreat, or reassurance-seeking. Similar behaviors also occur without pathological narcissism. An accurate clinical interpretation requires an individualized assessment and information beyond a partner’s account.
Popular expressions such as “covert narcissist,” “communal narcissist,” and “malignant narcissist” circulate widely. They have distinct histories in research or commentary, yet “covert narcissist” and “malignant narcissist” are not separate DSM-5-TR diagnoses. Descriptions of vulnerable narcissism should not be repackaged as remote diagnoses of quiet, sensitive, introverted, or insecure people.
For clinical context on these dimensions, see Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism: Traits and NPD.
What Does Research Actually Show About Narcissism and Relationships?
Research on narcissism and romantic relationships often uses questionnaires that measure dimensional traits in community samples. Many of these studies do not clinically diagnose NPD. Their findings illuminate possible interpersonal processes but cannot be directly converted into claims that all individuals with NPD behave in a particular way.
Admiration and rivalry are associated with different outcomes
Researchers commonly distinguish narcissistic admiration, which emphasizes self-promotion and recognition, from narcissistic rivalry, which involves antagonistic comparison and defending superiority against others. A longitudinal study by Kislev reported associations between increases in rivalry and decreases in relationship satisfaction, with other findings depending on the trait and analytic model.
A more recent study by Seidman and Chopik followed relationship satisfaction in 5,869 romantic dyads over as many as six years. Higher narcissistic rivalry in either partner was associated with lower relationship satisfaction in the overall sample. However, rivalry did not predict steeper subsequent declines in satisfaction, and admiration showed no significant association with satisfaction in that study. These results challenge a simple universal story in which narcissism necessarily makes every new romance deteriorate on a predictable timeline.
The appropriate conclusion is that antagonistic aspects of narcissism can be associated with relationship difficulty, while outcomes depend on which characteristics are measured, how relationships are studied, and the specific couple. Studies using one-item satisfaction ratings or self-report trait measures have limitations. They do not establish that a named partner has NPD, and they cannot establish the cause of one relationship’s conflict.
Relationship well-being and partner mental health
Dyadic research considers both the person reporting a characteristic and the partner affected by that person’s behavior. Lautenbacher, Eid, and Richter investigated admiration, rivalry, and romantic partners’ mental health in an actor–partner framework. Such studies encourage a relational view: each person brings experiences, vulnerabilities, and resources, while the couple’s dynamics unfold over time. Statistical associations are informative at group level and cannot replace direct attention to the distress, safety, and wishes of the individuals involved.
A daily-diary investigation by Balzen and colleagues also found different associations across narcissistic grandiosity, entitlement, and vulnerability, including links between entitlement or vulnerability and jealousy. This reinforces the importance of specifying the dimension instead of treating “narcissism” as one uniform behavior.
What research does not demonstrate
The available studies do not establish a diagnostic sequence of “love bombing,” “devaluation,” and “discard” through which every person with NPD must pass. Some people experience intense early affection followed by criticism, withdrawal, or separation, but the sequence is a popular explanatory narrative rather than a validated NPD diagnostic pathway. Researchers also cannot use a relationship’s deterioration as retrospective proof that one participant had a personality disorder.
The evidence for intimate relationships among clinically diagnosed NPD samples is more limited than the much larger literature on narcissistic traits. This evidence gap must remain visible whenever practical advice is extrapolated from trait studies.
Narcissistic Traits, Emotional Abuse, and Intimate Partner Violence
Narcissistic pathology, emotional abuse, and intimate partner violence require different kinds of evaluation. Emotional abuse concerns patterns of intimidation, humiliation, threats, coercion, and psychological harm. Intimate partner violence may include physical, sexual, psychological, stalking, and technology-facilitated abuse. A diagnosis of NPD is neither necessary nor sufficient for abusive conduct, and a mental-health diagnosis never removes responsibility for violent or controlling actions.
A systematic review and meta-analysis by Oliver, Coates, Bennett, and Willis combined 22 studies with 11,520 participants and found a weak positive association between trait narcissism and intimate partner violence perpetration (r = .15). Associations were observed for psychological and cyber forms, while the physical-violence subgroup association was not statistically significant. The authors also reported variation across measures and types of narcissism. The studies assessed traits, relied on self-report, and had substantial heterogeneity. These results must not be reported as a probability that a particular diagnosed person will abuse a partner.
The clinically useful question is what someone is doing and what happens when a boundary is set. A partner who checks private messages, restricts contact with family, threatens to reveal personal information, pressures someone sexually, or repeatedly intimidates them presents a safety concern whether or not the behavior reflects narcissistic pathology.
“Gaslighting” is commonly used for attempts to destabilize another person’s confidence in their perceptions or memory. It is not an NPD symptom or a diagnostic test. Persistent deception, denial, or reality distortion may be harmful, but the label alone cannot determine someone’s intentions, diagnosis, or level of danger. Likewise, saying that every painful disagreement is “narcissistic abuse” obscures the behaviors that actually need to be addressed.
When threats or coercive control are present, focus first on safety, documentation if safe, trusted assistance, and access to specialized support. Relationship counseling that requires both people to speak freely may be inappropriate when one participant fears retaliation. The diagnosis debate can be left aside.
Can You Tell Whether Your Partner Has NPD?
A partner may notice recurring entitlement, lack of reciprocity, emotional withdrawal, humiliation, manipulation, excessive demand for praise, or difficulty taking responsibility. Those observations can justify concern and action, but they cannot establish a personality disorder. Online symptom checklists, videos, and personality quizzes do not replace a diagnostic assessment. A clinical evaluation draws on a longitudinal history, multiple settings, mental-health and medical context, and the degree of impairment.
For NPD specifically, DSM-5-TR uses a categorical set of diagnostic features in the setting of a pervasive and enduring pattern. The alternative DSM-5 model evaluates personality functioning and maladaptive traits. In the ICD-11 framework, personality disorder is classified primarily by degree of severity and can be further characterized by trait qualifiers; it does not preserve NPD as the same separate named category used by DSM-5-TR. The WHO’s 2024 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements describes the ICD-11 clinical framework.
Identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy are relevant domains when clinicians assess personality functioning. Identity concerns a coherent sense of self and how self-esteem is regulated. Self-direction includes setting realistic and meaningful goals. Empathy concerns recognizing other people’s perspectives. Intimacy concerns the ability to sustain close, reciprocal connection. Their evaluation involves depth, persistence, context, and clinical judgment, rather than four quick questions to ask a partner.
Clinicians also consider depression, anxiety, trauma-related symptoms, substance use, mood episodes, neurodevelopmental differences, physical health, personality traits, and relational stressors. Co-occurrence is possible. The existence of another condition does not automatically establish or exclude NPD. A person seeking an evaluation can ask about structured diagnostic interviewing, functional impairment, and the clinician’s familiarity with personality disorders.
What if the person rejects the possibility of a diagnosis?
Someone may disagree with a proposed diagnosis, feel ashamed or stigmatized, or avoid treatment for many reasons. Trying to force agreement through a checklist or a confrontation may intensify conflict. A more useful approach is to describe specific behaviors and their consequences, state the change being requested, and offer clinical evaluation as an option. You can pursue your own counseling, practical protections, and relationship decisions even if the other person never accepts a label.
How to Respond to Recurring Relationship Problems
Describe observable behavior and its effect
Specific observations are easier to evaluate than global labels. For example: “When you raised your voice and mocked me during our conversation, I stopped feeling safe discussing the issue. I am willing to continue when we can both speak without insults.” A description identifies behavior, impact, and a practical next step. It leaves room for responsibility and repair.
If a disagreement begins to escalate, a planned pause with a clear time to revisit the issue can help when both partners respect the plan. With intimidation or coercion, disengagement and safety take priority over obtaining mutual agreement. Communication techniques are tools, not a guarantee that the other person will respond constructively.
Establish boundaries you can actually maintain
A boundary specifies what you will do to protect your time, privacy, dignity, and safety. Examples include ending a conversation when insults begin, keeping passwords private, maintaining contact with friends, declining sexual activity, or refusing financial commitments made under pressure. A boundary is meaningful when it is clear, proportionate, and feasible.
You cannot single-handedly ensure that another person respects a boundary. Track the pattern over time: are concerns heard, is the boundary respected, and does behavior change? The response to reasonable limits may reveal more about relationship health than promises offered during reconciliation.
Build independent support and preserve choice
Recurring interpersonal stress may erode confidence, concentration, sleep, and connections outside the relationship. Talking with trusted people or an individual therapist can help organize what has happened and identify decisions compatible with one’s values and circumstances. Practical factors—including housing, financial dependence, children, immigration circumstances, disabilities, and access to confidential communication—may affect the available options.
Someone does not have to prove that a partner meets NPD criteria in order to seek help or decide to leave. Similarly, choosing to remain while pursuing support should be based on informed choice, observed behavior, and personal safety, rather than a prediction derived from a label.
When relationship or couples therapy may help
Couples therapy may be useful when both people can participate voluntarily, acknowledge their behavior, and discuss difficult material without fear or punishment. Its goal is to evaluate communication, shared expectations, repair, and the relationship itself; it is not a shortcut to diagnosing a partner. If there is intimidation, coercive control, or violence, speak confidentially with a clinician or domestic-violence specialist before arranging joint sessions. Individual safety and freedom to speak are essential conditions.
What Can a Person Diagnosed With NPD Do?
People diagnosed with NPD may seek help because of conflict, loneliness, persistent dissatisfaction, rejection sensitivity, depression, work problems, or other concerns. The starting point is an individual formulation of patterns that affect relationships and well-being. It may include identifying triggers for shame or defensiveness, noticing assumptions about a partner’s motives, practicing repair, developing more stable self-esteem, and tolerating differences without treating disagreement as humiliation.
An important clinical distinction is between understanding an interpersonal problem and repeatedly changing the behavior that causes it. A person may intellectually recognize a partner’s feelings yet struggle to respond consistently when threatened, criticized, or distressed. Psychotherapy can work on both insight and everyday behavior, using specific, reviewable goals.
Practical targets may include listening without immediately rebutting, recognizing a partner’s independent preferences, apologizing without attaching blame, respecting privacy, negotiating power fairly, and returning to difficult conversations after emotional arousal subsides. Progress can be evaluated through sustained change in functioning and relationships, not through the disappearance of every narcissistic trait.
Treatment, Change, and the Limits of Current Evidence
Psychotherapy is the central clinical approach considered for NPD. Treatments described in the specialist literature include psychodynamic and transference-focused approaches, mentalization-informed work, schema-focused approaches, and other individualized psychotherapies. Shared therapeutic priorities include an effective working alliance, attention to interpersonal patterns, realistic goals, sustained engagement, and monitoring risk or co-occurring problems. The overview by Weinberg and Ronningstam and a 2024 clinical discussion of transference-focused principles support these treatment considerations.
The evidence base specific to NPD remains relatively small. Some publications are clinical case studies or nonrandomized observational reports, which can inform practice but do not prove comparative efficacy. In a 2024 case series, eight selected patients improved substantially during years of psychotherapy; the design provides examples of possible change but cannot establish the expected rate of recovery for the wider NPD population. A 2025 review of personality-disorder psychotherapies underscores how uneven the evidence remains across diagnoses. Findings from borderline personality disorder treatment should not automatically be transferred to NPD.
There is no medication established as a specific cure for NPD. A psychiatrist may consider medication when separately treatable co-occurring conditions or target symptoms warrant it. Prescribing decisions depend on the full clinical picture, benefits, harms, and monitoring; medication should not be treated as a substitute for work on interpersonal functioning.
Can someone with NPD change? Clinical and longitudinal evidence supports the possibility of improvement, and some people make meaningful changes in relationships and general functioning. The degree and pace of change vary. An individual cannot guarantee a partner’s recovery by providing more praise, loyalty, patience, or opportunities. Reliable signs of improvement include personal ownership of harmful behavior, sustained treatment engagement when appropriate, and changes observable across situations and time.
When the Relationship Involves Safety Risks
Threats, stalking, sexual coercion, physical violence, control of money or movement, or fear of retaliation require attention to safety rather than an argument about diagnosis. If there is immediate danger in the United States, call 911 when it is safe to do so. The National Domestic Violence Hotline provides confidential support and safety-planning information in the United States. Consider whether device use, browsing history, location sharing, or messages may be monitored before seeking help online.
Safety planning is personal. A trusted person, accessible documents, essential medications, emergency contacts, safe transportation, and a plan for children or dependents may be relevant. When separation could escalate danger, specialized advice may be safer than announcing plans or confronting the person alone. Anyone experiencing self-harm thoughts or an acute mental-health crisis should seek immediate local emergency or crisis support; crisis assessment depends on the situation rather than on an NPD label.
Common Misconceptions About NPD in Relationships
A popular misconception is that everyone with NPD is charismatic during courtship and cruel later. Individual courses differ, and the current evidence does not establish one obligatory romantic sequence.
Another misconception is that someone who shows affection, guilt, or empathy cannot have NPD. Emotional life and empathy are multidimensional; clinical patterns can be uneven and context-dependent. It is equally mistaken to assume that a diagnosis means a person will inevitably be abusive.
A third misconception is that “narcissist,” “psychopath,” “sociopath,” “gaslighter,” and “abuser” are interchangeable terms. They refer to different diagnostic categories, research constructs, popular descriptions, or behaviors. Precision protects both accurate clinical assessment and the person who needs support because of harmful conduct.
For the separate diagnosis and its clinical boundaries, read Antisocial Personality Disorder: Diagnosis and Treatment.
Finally, people may believe that finding the correct diagnostic label will settle whether to stay, leave, confront, or seek treatment. A label can support clinical understanding when established appropriately. Relationship choices require attention to behavior, trust, safety, practical resources, each person’s willingness to change, and what the affected person wants for their own life.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a person with narcissistic personality disorder love someone?
Yes, people with NPD can experience attachment, affection, attraction, desire for closeness, and meaningful relationships. The presence of love does not automatically resolve difficulties with empathy, reciprocity, entitlement, or conflict. A relationship’s health depends on how affection is translated into reliable actions and mutual respect.
What are the biggest relationship difficulties associated with NPD?
Clinical formulations often concern unstable self-esteem, sensitivity to criticism, struggles with empathy and mutuality, and difficulty repairing interpersonal conflict. Each person’s pattern is different, and these problems also occur in other conditions or in relationships without a diagnosable disorder.
How do I know if I am dating a narcissist?
The everyday word “narcissist” cannot answer a clinical question. Notice concrete patterns such as disrespect, ignored boundaries, controlling behavior, or chronic conflict, and consider professional support for your own well-being. Only an appropriate evaluation of the person concerned can establish NPD.
Do people with NPD always manipulate their partners?
No. Exploitation and entitlement can be relevant clinical features, but neither a diagnosis nor a trait score establishes that every individual manipulates others. Specific deception or coercion should be addressed based on the behavior and its consequences.
Is “love bombing” a symptom of NPD?
No. “Love bombing” is a popular term used to describe overwhelming affection or attention, sometimes in the context of coercive relationships. It is not a DSM-5-TR criterion for NPD and cannot establish a diagnosis. Assess the larger pattern, autonomy, respect, and any pressure or threats.
Is a “covert narcissist” an official diagnosis?
No. “Covert narcissist” is an informal description often associated with vulnerable forms of narcissism. Clinical and research discussions of vulnerability are useful, but they do not create a separate DSM-5-TR disorder.
Is narcissistic abuse a clinical diagnosis?
No. Psychological abuse, intimidation, and coercive control are serious concerns regardless of the perpetrator’s psychiatric status. The phrase “narcissistic abuse” is widely used in popular discourse, but it does not establish a diagnostic subtype or identify the cause of mistreatment.
Can couples therapy repair a relationship affected by NPD?
It may help some couples when both people participate freely, can take responsibility, and are safe to discuss conflict. Individual treatment can also be important. Where coercive control or violence is present, specialized safety assessment should precede any joint treatment decision.
Can NPD improve with treatment?
Meaningful improvement is possible, but research specifically testing treatments for NPD is limited. Clinical reports and small observational studies show change in some patients, while the likelihood and pace of improvement for any individual cannot be predicted from a brief description.
How should I set boundaries with a partner who becomes defensive?
Choose concrete limits about conduct rather than trying to win a diagnostic debate. Explain what behavior is unacceptable and what action you will take, such as ending a conversation when insults begin. If setting a boundary increases threats or danger, seek specialized safety support rather than escalating the confrontation.
Should I leave a partner who has NPD?
There is no diagnosis-based answer to this personal decision. Consider safety, respect, the nature and persistence of harmful behavior, access to support, practical constraints, and genuine patterns of change. You may seek individual counseling or specialist assistance regardless of whether your partner has a diagnosis.
Related Articles
Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment — the core clinical guide to diagnosis, manifestations, and treatment.
How Are Personality Disorders Diagnosed? The Clinical Assessment Process — why clinical evaluation differs from a partner’s observations or an online test.
Personality Disorders: Types, Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment — the EN-13 foundation covering classification and clinical care.
Avoidant Attachment Style: Signs, Triggers, Relationships, and the Dismissive-Avoidant Pattern — a distinct, non-diagnostic attachment topic that readers often confuse with personality pathology.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2024). What Is Narcissistic Personality Disorder?. Psychiatry.org.
Balzen, K. M., Knoch, D. A., Millward, K. A., Corretti, C. A., & Ackerman, R. A. (2022). Narcissistic traits and romantic relationship outcomes: A short daily diary investigation. Journal of Research in Personality, 96, 104179.
Baskin-Sommers, A., Krusemark, E., & Ronningstam, E. (2014). Empathy in narcissistic personality disorder: From clinical and empirical perspectives. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(3), 323–333.
Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Meyerbröker, K. (2025). Psychotherapies for the treatment of personality disorders: The state of the art. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 38(1), 66–71.
Hersh, R. G. (2024). Treating narcissistic disorders in general psychiatry: Practical application of transference-focused psychotherapy principles. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 52(2), 150–172.
Jauk, E., et al. (2022). The nonlinear association between grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: An individual data meta-analysis. Journal of Personality.
Kislev, E. (2023). The longitudinal effect of narcissistic admiration and rivalry traits on relationship satisfaction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(7), 865–874.
Lautenbacher, L. M., Eid, M., & Richter, D. (2023). Do narcissistic admiration and rivalry matter for the mental health of romantic partners? Insights from actor-partner interdependence models. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(8).
Oliver, E., Coates, A., Bennett, J. M., & Willis, M. L. (2024). Narcissism and intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(3), 1871–1884.
Ritter, K., et al. (2011). Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psychiatry Research.
Ronningstam, E., & Weinberg, I. (2023). Narcissistic personality disorder: Patterns, processes, and indicators of change in long-term psychotherapy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 37(3), 337–357.
Seidman, G., & Chopik, W. J. (2026). From spark to strain? Changes in relationship satisfaction as a function of narcissistic admiration and rivalry. Journal of Personality.
Weinberg, I., & Ronningstam, E. (2022). Narcissistic personality disorder: Progress in understanding and treatment. FOCUS, 20(4).
Weinberg, I., Ronningstam, E., Ravichandran, C., & Gunderson, J. G. (2024). Can patients with narcissistic personality disorder change? A case series. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 212(7), 392–397.
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. WHO.