Dialectical Behavior Therapy for BPD: How DBT Works and Evidence

Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) is a structured psychotherapy developed for borderline personality disorder (BPD), especially when intense emotional distress, impulsive behavior, recurrent crises, or self-injury interfere with daily life. A comprehensive DBT program combines individual treatment, group skills training, between-session coaching, and a consultation team for clinicians. Its central aim is to help a person build safer, more workable behavior while developing acceptance of the present experience.

DBT is one of the best-studied specialized treatments for BPD. Randomized studies and systematic reviews indicate benefits for self-harm, BPD symptoms, and some functional outcomes, with substantial variation by comparison treatment, population, and study quality. The 2024 American Psychiatric Association practice guideline supports structured, evidence-based psychotherapy targeting BPD's core features rather than declaring any single model superior for every person.

What Is DBT for Borderline Personality Disorder?

Psychologist Marsha Linehan developed DBT as a behavioral treatment for people with BPD and especially those experiencing repeated suicidal or self-injurious behavior. The dialectical framework brings together acceptance and change. Patients learn to understand the circumstances in which dangerous or ineffective responses emerge, validate legitimate emotional experiences, and practice alternative behaviors that advance safety and personally meaningful goals.

For the BPD-specific evidence on emotional reactivity, affective instability, and recovery, see the guide to emotional dysregulation in borderline personality disorder.

BPD is a heterogeneous clinical diagnosis. People differ in their emotional patterns, relationships, identity, functioning, exposure to trauma, and histories of risk behavior. Self-injury is not a universal feature of BPD. A diagnostic evaluation should consider longitudinal patterns, impairment, co-occurring conditions, and safety. DBT is a therapy, not a diagnostic test, and an online checklist does not establish BPD.

How Comprehensive DBT Works

The best-studied outpatient model coordinates four treatment modes. Their purpose is to connect understanding, practice, and clinical support. Programs that offer only a skills class or an individual therapist using selected DBT techniques may still be helpful, but should accurately describe themselves as adaptations.

Individual psychotherapy

Individual sessions commonly occur weekly. Therapist and patient work together to identify treatment priorities, review recent crises and successes, examine triggers and consequences, and develop a plan. Diary cards may track emotions, urges, behaviors, and skill use. Chain analysis reconstructs an event step by step, allowing the patient to identify possible points for a safer response. This is collaborative problem-solving rather than an exercise in blame.

Skills training group

Weekly skills training, commonly around two hours, teaches and rehearses mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness. People practice between sessions and review where skills were useful or difficult. Group skills training is typically an educational part of the treatment, not a replacement for the individualized clinical work of comprehensive DBT.

Between-session coaching

Brief telephone coaching or another agreed contact method helps transfer skills to the situations where they are needed. Programs should state availability, response times, confidentiality, and how to access urgent or emergency care. DBT coaching is not a substitute for emergency services.

Therapist consultation team

Clinicians working within comprehensive DBT normally meet regularly for consultation, treatment fidelity, complex clinical decisions, and support. The consultation component helps maintain a coordinated therapeutic approach and addresses difficulties that can arise in high-intensity care.

The Four Core DBT Skills

Mindfulness

Mindfulness helps people notice emotional and physical experiences without immediately acting on every urge. For example, a delayed message can trigger fear of rejection; noticing the interpretation and bodily response can make room for checking facts and choosing a deliberate response.

Distress tolerance

Distress tolerance involves methods for navigating intense states and difficult circumstances without increasing danger. It is particularly relevant when short-term relief from impulsive actions has become costly. These skills support safety while the person and care team address underlying interpersonal, social, or medical problems.

Emotion regulation

Emotion regulation develops understanding of emotional patterns, vulnerability factors, and behavioral options. Treatment can include monitoring sleep, substance use, stress, physical health, and responses to conflict. The aim is greater freedom to choose helpful behavior, not the abolition of emotion.

Interpersonal effectiveness

Interpersonal skills help people express needs, negotiate disagreements, maintain boundaries, and protect self-respect. Practice may include asking for clarification after a conflict, making a request without escalation, or ending unsafe interactions. What counts as effective depends on a person's values and context.

Why DBT May Help: The Working Clinical Model

DBT's biosocial model proposes that emotion-regulation difficulties can emerge through interactions between individual vulnerabilities and environments where emotional experiences are repeatedly dismissed or misunderstood. This is a useful therapeutic formulation, not a single proven cause of BPD or a universal biography. Mechanisms may include improved skill use, behavioral rehearsal, reinforcement of safer actions, a collaborative therapeutic relationship, and increased capacity to tolerate distress.

Treatment commonly prioritizes life-threatening behavior when present, obstacles that disrupt therapy, and behaviors that seriously reduce quality of life. Meaningful life-building goals run throughout treatment. Identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy may be relevant to assessing long-term functioning. The hierarchy describes clinical priorities and does not imply that all people diagnosed with BPD engage in self-injury.

What the Scientific Evidence Shows

Evaluating DBT requires separating outcomes: reduction in self-harm, suicide-related events, emotional symptoms, BPD severity, relationships, daily functioning, and use of emergency services are related but distinct. The strength of evidence also depends on whether the comparison is no treatment, routine care, or another structured psychotherapy. Early studies enrolled predominantly women with recent suicidal or self-injurious behavior, limiting automatic generalization to other BPD presentations.

Self-harm and suicidal behavior

The 2020 Cochrane review of psychological therapies for BPD found that, compared with treatment as usual, DBT appeared more effective for BPD severity, self-harm, and psychosocial functioning. Those DBT-specific outcomes were supported by low-certainty evidence and should be understood as average results across selected trials, not guaranteed outcomes for individuals.

A 2019 meta-analysis of controlled DBT trials, spanning more than one diagnostic population, found a small reduction in self-directed violence (d = −0.324) and psychiatric crisis-service use (d = −0.379), while the pooled effect on suicidal ideation was not statistically significant. This matters because thoughts, attempts, nonsuicidal self-injury, and treatment contacts require separate measurement and careful clinical interpretation.

In an influential 2006 randomized trial, 101 women with BPD and recent suicidal or self-injurious behavior received DBT or treatment from community psychotherapy experts. DBT produced better results in several target areas during treatment and subsequent follow-up. Participants were a high-risk selected population, making the study particularly relevant to that presentation while providing limited support for universal claims about every BPD patient.

BPD symptoms and psychosocial functioning

The Cochrane review suggests that BPD-tailored psychotherapies improve overall symptom burden relative to usual treatment, although findings for self-harm and social functioning did not consistently exceed thresholds for clinically important differences. The 2017 systematic review and meta-analysis by Cristea and colleagues also identified benefits for DBT and some other specialized therapies, while noting that effects tended to shrink in better-controlled comparisons against structured active treatments.

Therapy may yield important changes such as greater daily stability, stronger boundaries, safer decisions, and improved participation in relationships, work, or education. Measuring only total BPD symptoms can obscure functional progress or persistent needs. The 2024 systematic review by Crotty and colleagues contributes to the contemporary evidence base but does not remove the substantial differences among interventions and study designs.

Depression, anger, and emotional distress

A 2021 meta-analysis reported favorable effects for self-harm and depressive symptoms, but its pooled estimates did not establish clear benefits for suicidal ideation and anger. A newer 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis, covering seven controlled trials, estimated a moderate improvement in depressive symptoms after standard DBT (standardized mean difference approximately −0.59). Results were heterogeneous, with I² exceeding 80 percent.

For anger, the 2026 review reported a favorable estimate using one approach, but statistical significance disappeared after a more conservative Knapp–Hartung adjustment; only three studies assessed anger. These results support a cautious conclusion: improvements in negative affect may occur, yet the precision and reliability of estimates differ by outcome. It would be inaccurate to promise that DBT eliminates anger or depression.

Emergency-service use and longer-term outcomes

Some randomized studies report reductions in emergency visits or inpatient days, especially in people who had frequent crises before treatment. These outcomes depend on local access to care and the quality of the comparison service. Follow-up after a formal DBT course suggests that some improvements can persist, but studies differ in duration, dropout rates, additional treatment, and outcome definitions. A person's recovery should be evaluated longitudinally, including both safety and everyday functioning.

Is DBT more effective than other specialist BPD treatments?

Not consistently. The 2009 randomized comparison by McMain and colleagues allocated 180 patients with BPD and a history of suicidal or nonsuicidal self-injury to one year of DBT or general psychiatric management delivered by experienced clinicians. Both groups improved in self-harm, overall symptoms, and other clinical outcomes. No significant differences were found across the study's measured outcomes.

The 2024 APA BPD guideline recommends a structured approach to psychotherapy that has supporting evidence and addresses the disorder's core features. DBT is a substantial option within that category. Mentalization-based treatment, transference-focused treatment, schema therapy, and other structured models differ in mechanisms and evidence strength. Treatment choice involves risk profile, patient preferences, clinician expertise, availability, and quality of implementation.

For a comparison of modalities and their evidence, consult Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: Treatments and Evidence. This article concentrates on DBT as used in BPD treatment, rather than on generic DBT skills for unrelated clinical problems.

How Long Does DBT Take?

One year is a common comprehensive outpatient format, often involving weekly individual sessions, a weekly skills group, access to agreed coaching, and regular therapist consultation. Some programs offer six months, while others repeat skills curricula or plan longer periods. Duration should reflect the individual's needs rather than a claim that every person requires the same schedule.

A 2022 randomized noninferiority trial compared six versus twelve months of comprehensive DBT in 240 patients with BPD and suicidal or self-harming histories. The six-month program met the trial's noninferiority criteria for total self-harm and some additional outcomes. This suggests that a shorter comprehensive course can be effective for selected patients, but it does not establish that six months is sufficient for every patient or every outcome.

Treatment planning should consider whether major safety risks have stabilized, whether the patient can use skills outside sessions, whether functional goals are progressing, whether trauma or other co-occurring disorders require additional care, and what clinical support will be available after the program.

Do DBT Skills Alone Work as Well as Comprehensive DBT?

A stand-alone skills group, workbook, digital course, or individual therapist using selected DBT techniques offers a different intervention from comprehensive DBT. Such formats may be useful, but efficacy estimates from comprehensive DBT randomized trials should not automatically be assigned to them.

In a 2015 randomized component analysis, different DBT configurations all produced improvements on multiple suicide-related measures. Conditions incorporating skills training had advantages on some outcomes. This study contributes evidence about components without proving that a particular component is universally sufficient or that all delivery formats are equivalent.

A 2010 study of DBT skills use linked greater skills use with clinical improvement, making skill acquisition one plausible pathway of change. Other pathways—including therapeutic alliance, environmental change, exposure to avoided experience, and the reduction of reinforcement for harmful responses—also warrant consideration. Correlation and mediation findings do not conclusively establish a complete causal mechanism.

How DBT Progress Is Measured

Good clinical monitoring covers the outcomes that matter for the individual: current safety, frequency and severity of harmful behaviors where relevant, BPD symptoms, emotional coping, substance use, attendance and engagement, interpersonal functioning, and the ability to pursue personal goals. Diary cards can support review, but a self-report score alone neither diagnoses BPD nor measures the whole of recovery. A collaboratively revised care plan allows meaningful progress to be recognized without hiding ongoing problems.

Starting DBT: Assessment, Commitment, and a Typical Treatment Week

Before treatment begins, the clinician should evaluate presenting difficulties, individual strengths, physical and psychiatric history, previous care, current risk, and the patient's own priorities. If a BPD diagnosis has been made, its basis should be explained; clinicians should evaluate co-occurring conditions and avoid assuming that one diagnosis accounts for every symptom. The APA practice guideline recommends a thorough initial assessment and collaboratively formulated treatment plan.

At the beginning of DBT, therapist and patient commonly discuss the program's behavioral commitments, missed-session procedures, diary cards, homework, telephone coaching, confidentiality, and crisis response. Commitment is a negotiated and revisited therapeutic process. People may need adjustments for work schedules, disability, transportation, caregiving, language access, finances, or cultural expectations; a good program treats these as practical care issues rather than evidence of moral failure.

During a typical week, the patient attends an individual session and a skills-training meeting, uses selected skills between visits, records important events on a diary card, and may seek brief coaching under agreed conditions. Skills are reviewed using recent experiences, including instances in which a strategy did not work. Treatment targets become more individualized as the patient makes progress and clarifies what a meaningful life would involve.

Who May Benefit From DBT for BPD?

Comprehensive DBT may be particularly relevant when a person with BPD experiences intense distress, repeated behavioral crises, self-injury, impulsive actions, or serious barriers to carrying out safer coping plans. A history of self-injury is not a prerequisite for considering DBT. The fit also depends on what the patient wishes to change, their response to previous treatment, local expertise, access, and personal preferences.

BPD exists across diverse genders, ages, and sociocultural contexts, while important early DBT trials predominantly studied women with severe self-harm histories. A careful clinician considers what the evidence can and cannot predict for other groups. Cultural expectations around emotional expression, interdependence, family responsibilities, privacy, and clinical relationships should shape collaboration rather than become grounds for stereotyped assumptions.

Adolescents and DBT-A

DBT for adolescents (DBT-A) is a developmentally adapted approach often designed for young people experiencing repetitive self-harm or suicidal ideation, and may incorporate caregiver or family skills. A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis of DBT-A found controlled-trial benefits for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation, but the studies do not establish that every adolescent participant had BPD or that adolescent outcomes directly predict adult BPD treatment effects. Assessment, consent, family involvement, and risk management require developmentally appropriate clinical judgment.

Co-occurring disorders, trauma, and neurodevelopmental differences

People with BPD may also experience PTSD, major depression, substance-use disorders, anxiety, eating disorders, ADHD, autism, or medical conditions. These should be assessed independently. DBT skills can be integrated into a coordinated treatment plan, but evidence for BPD-specific DBT cannot be transferred automatically to a different condition or adapted protocol. Trauma-focused work may be planned when clinically appropriate and safe, sometimes alongside or after stabilization of immediate life-threatening behaviors.

For autistic patients or those with ADHD, clinicians may need to adapt pacing, sensory demands, communication, reminders, group participation, homework, and expectations for behavior. Such modifications should be individualized, with the evidence level for each specific adaptation stated honestly. The purpose is equitable, usable care, not requiring patients to suppress neurodevelopmental traits to satisfy a therapy template.

When an alternative structured treatment may be preferable

A patient may favor another evidence-supported BPD psychotherapy, require integrated addiction care, need a different intensity of service, or find a group format inaccessible despite accommodations. The McMain randomized comparison and the APA guideline support informed choice among legitimate structured options. If DBT is not available or has proved a poor fit, professional reassessment and an alternative care plan remain reasonable.

Safety, Treatment Burdens, and Possible Unwanted Effects

DBT is widely used, but treatment can be demanding. Reconstructing painful events, attending multiple weekly sessions, discussing suicidal thoughts, participating in groups, and practicing unfamiliar behaviors can bring temporary distress, fatigue, shame, or practical strain. The strength of an evidence base for symptom improvement does not establish that adverse effects are impossible. Research has often measured unwanted effects inconsistently, as the Cochrane review notes.

Therapists should monitor worsening distress, disengagement, severe conflict within treatment, unsafe behavior, and the patient's experience of the therapeutic relationship. If the treatment schedule or group setting is harmful or inaccessible, a collaborative adjustment or alternative program may be appropriate. A clinician should explain how to raise concerns, how to access urgent care, and how confidentiality and crisis procedures work.

Risk assessment and safety planning are individualized. People experiencing imminent danger or an acute suicidal crisis need timely emergency assessment, not a workbook technique or unmonitored online coaching. In the United States, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline offers crisis support by call or text; call emergency services when there is immediate physical danger. The BPD and Self-Harm: Risk, Safety Planning, and Treatment guide addresses this clinical scenario in greater detail. Many people with BPD never engage in self-harm, and all deserve care free of stereotyping.

DBT and Medication: What Do Guidelines Recommend?

Medication is not a substitute for a structured psychotherapy addressing BPD's core difficulties. The APA 2024 guideline recommends that psychotropic medication used for BPD be time-limited, directed toward a specific measurable symptom, and adjunctive to psychotherapy. The NICE guideline advises against drug treatment specifically for BPD itself or its individual symptoms, while allowing appropriate treatment of co-occurring conditions.

These recommendations concern BPD-specific prescribing and should not lead anyone to discontinue medication prescribed for major depression, bipolar disorder, epilepsy, or another clinically established condition. Medication decisions require a licensed prescriber to consider diagnosis, interactions, adverse effects, history, and patient preferences. The therapist and prescriber may coordinate care with consent.

How to Choose a DBT Program and Therapist

A service description should specify exactly which components are provided. Ask whether the program offers individual DBT psychotherapy, a structured skills curriculum, between-session coaching, and a clinician consultation team. Ask how clinicians have been trained, whether fidelity to the model is reviewed, how treatment goals are measured, and how the team supports patients with the particular problems that brought them to care.

Also ask how long the course lasts, how group meetings operate, what a missed appointment means, whether insurance covers services, what contact is available after hours, who handles emergencies, whether telehealth or disability accommodations are offered, and how the team coordinates with other healthcare providers. A program calling itself DBT-informed may offer useful care, but should distinguish its services from comprehensive DBT tested in trials.

An informed clinician can explain the likely benefits and limitations of the offered format, discuss alternative evidence-supported approaches, make room for the patient's questions, and plan transitions or follow-up support. Treatment quality involves clinical skill, collaboration, access, safety, and continuous evaluation; a promotional claim or unverified certificate cannot establish these on its own.

DBT, Recovery, and Long-Term Personality Functioning

Meaningful progress can include fewer crises, greater ability to tolerate and respond to distress, improved trust and boundaries, more stable education or employment, improved self-direction, and greater freedom to pursue personally important relationships and activities. Clinical improvement may occur at different rates across these outcomes. Less self-harm does not by itself mean every problem in identity, intimacy, or daily functioning has resolved.

BPD has a variable, often improving long-term course, and people can achieve substantial symptom remission and functional recovery. Different outcomes may require sustained support after a DBT program ends. Recovery should be defined collaboratively and considered in the context of family, safety, socioeconomic conditions, and continuing access to care. For more detail, see Can Borderline Personality Disorder Improve? Recovery and Prognosis.

Frequently Asked Questions About DBT for BPD

Is DBT the best therapy for borderline personality disorder?

DBT is among the most extensively studied structured BPD therapies, especially for patients with recurrent self-harm or other high-risk patterns. Evidence does not establish that it is consistently superior to every other specialized psychotherapy. The most suitable treatment depends on a person's clinical needs, preferences, risk, access, therapist expertise, and treatment quality.

Can I have BPD and benefit from DBT even if I have never self-harmed?

Yes. A self-harm history is not required for BPD diagnosis and is not a universal prerequisite for DBT. The treatment may address emotional coping, impulsive behavior, interpersonal conflict, self-direction, and other personal goals. The clinical team should decide whether comprehensive DBT or another structured approach best fits the presentation.

Is a DBT skills group the same as comprehensive DBT?

No. Skills training is an important component of comprehensive DBT, but the standard program also includes individual psychotherapy, agreed between-session coaching, and therapist consultation. Research outcomes from the complete program do not automatically apply to a skills-only class, app, book, or informal coaching.

How long does it take for DBT to start working?

Some patients notice changes in coping or safety within the first months, while changes in relationships, identity, and daily functioning may take longer. There is no scientifically established universal week by which treatment must work. Monitoring should focus on actual goals and risk, not an advertised deadline. A randomized trial suggests six-month comprehensive DBT can be sufficient for selected outcomes in some higher-risk BPD patients, while others need longer or different treatment.

Can DBT make emotional distress worse at first?

Discussing difficult situations and practicing unfamiliar strategies may temporarily increase discomfort. New or escalating self-harm risk, marked deterioration, severe treatment conflict, or an unsafe therapeutic environment should be addressed promptly with the treating clinician. An explanation that distress is always necessary for recovery would be misleading.

Is DBT only for women or young adults?

No. DBT is used across genders and adult age groups. Some influential studies recruited mostly women and people with suicidal or self-injurious behaviors, so their estimates may not generalize equally to everyone. Age, individual risk, cultural circumstances, and available clinical adaptations matter.

Is DBT a treatment for suicidal thinking alone?

DBT was developed in part to address life-threatening patterns in high-risk BPD populations, but its clinical aims extend to emotion regulation, functional improvement, relationships, and a meaningful life. Suicidal ideation, attempts, and nonsuicidal self-injury are distinct outcomes; evidence for one should not be presented as identical to evidence for another.

Does DBT cure borderline personality disorder?

DBT can support major improvements in symptoms and functioning, sometimes sustained after a treatment course. Individual outcomes differ, and long-term care can involve additional steps. The word cure is not a reliable prediction of what any single patient will experience. Symptom remission, safety, quality of life, and functioning all deserve separate attention.

Can someone do DBT online or from a workbook?

Clinician-delivered remote DBT may improve access when a service can deliver and coordinate the relevant components safely. Self-help materials can reinforce skills, but do not provide comprehensive assessment, risk monitoring, crisis response, or individualized psychotherapy. Evidence from in-person clinical trials should not be automatically transferred to an unstudied app or standalone online course.

What happens if DBT is unavailable or does not seem to help?

A clinician can reassess safety, co-occurring conditions, treatment adherence and accessibility, personal goals, and whether a different structured psychotherapy is preferable. The APA guideline supports psychotherapy tailored to core BPD features without requiring every patient to receive DBT. Difficulty with one program should prompt adjustments or alternatives rather than a judgment about a person's prospects.

Related Articles

Borderline Personality Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment — the central clinical BPD overview.

Psychotherapy for Personality Disorders: Treatments and Evidence — context and comparisons across structured treatments.

BPD and Self-Harm: Risk, Safety Planning, and Treatment — focused discussion of safety and clinical risk.

Can Borderline Personality Disorder Improve? Recovery and Prognosis — evidence on long-term symptom and functional outcomes.

Mentalization-Based Treatment for BPD: How MBT Works and Evidence

Personality Disorders: Types, Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2024). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.24181010.

Chen, S., et al. (2021). Effects of dialectical behaviour therapy on reducing self-harming behaviours and negative emotions in patients with borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12797.

Cristea, I. A., et al. (2017). Efficacy of psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/2605200.

Crotty, K., et al. (2024). Psychotherapies for the treatment of borderline personality disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000833.

DeCou, C. R., Comtois, K. A., & Landes, S. J. (2019). Dialectical behavior therapy is effective for the treatment of suicidal behavior: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2018.03.009.

Kothgassner, O. D., et al. (2021). Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescent self-harm and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001355.

Li, Y., & Mao, W. (2026). Effect of dialectical behavior therapy on affective symptoms in borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117055.

Linehan, M. M., et al. (2006). Two-year randomized controlled trial and follow-up of dialectical behavior therapy vs therapy by experts for suicidal behaviors and borderline personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.757.

Linehan, M. M., et al. (2015). Dialectical behavior therapy for high suicide risk in individuals with borderline personality disorder: A randomized clinical trial and component analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3039.

McMain, S. F., et al. (2009). A randomized trial of dialectical behavior therapy versus general psychiatric management for borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09010039.

McMain, S. F., et al. (2022). The effectiveness of 6 versus 12 months of dialectical behavior therapy for borderline personality disorder: A noninferiority randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. https://doi.org/10.1159/000525102.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2009; current online guidance). Borderline personality disorder: Recognition and management (CG78). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg78/chapter/Recommendations.

Neacsiu, A. D., Rizvi, S. L., & Linehan, M. M. (2010). Dialectical behavior therapy skills use as a mediator and outcome of treatment for borderline personality disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.05.017.

Storebø, O. J., et al. (2020). Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.