Can Borderline Personality Disorder Improve? Recovery and Prognosis
Updated: 3 days ago
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Yes. Borderline personality disorder (BPD) can improve substantially, and sustained symptom remission is common in long-term clinical research. Studies that have followed people for a decade or longer document major reductions in diagnostic symptoms. A more complete recovery—one that includes stable everyday functioning, relationships, and participation in work or education—may take longer and require continued support. Understanding both outcomes gives a more accurate answer than declaring BPD permanent or promising a cure. Long-term meta-analysis; American Psychiatric Association guideline.
Improvement follows different timelines. One person may rapidly develop safer ways of responding to intense emotions while still finding relationships difficult. Another may gradually rebuild occupational functioning after emotional crises have diminished. Some people live for years with very few symptoms; others experience renewed difficulties during periods of stress. The diagnostic label alone cannot predict an individual life. This article examines what long-term studies actually measured, how remission differs from recovery, what influences prognosis, and how treatment and practical support can improve outcomes.
What does recovery from borderline personality disorder mean?
BPD is a clinical personality disorder associated with persistent disturbances in emotion regulation, sense of self, interpersonal functioning, and, in some cases, impulsive behavior. Diagnosis requires professional evaluation of longstanding patterns, their impact, developmental context, and other explanations. Neither a questionnaire score nor a description of a single interpersonal conflict establishes BPD. A personality trait, maladaptive trait, current symptom, clinical diagnosis, and level of functioning are related but distinct concepts. National Institute of Mental Health.
Symptom reduction and clinical remission
Symptom reduction means that a person's difficulties become less frequent, intense, persistent, or disruptive. Less emotional reactivity, fewer unsafe impulsive behaviors, a more stable sense of identity, and more effective communication may all represent real progress. Clinical remission is usually defined in research by falling below a specified number of diagnostic criteria for a specified time. Investigators have used intervals as short as two months and as long as two or four years. A remission rate makes sense only alongside the study's particular definition and observation period. Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study; McLean Study of Adult Development.
Functional recovery and quality of life
Functional recovery asks a further question: What is becoming possible in the person's daily life? It concerns participation in relationships, school, employment, community activity, independent living where appropriate, and meaningful goals. Research often measures social and vocational functioning, yet good functioning should also be understood in relation to disability, health, poverty, available accommodations, caregiving, and personal priorities. Patient-reported quality of life adds dimensions that symptom checklists cannot fully capture.
The McLean research program operationalized recovery as both diagnostic remission and good social and vocational functioning maintained across a two-year interval. Its stringent definition deliberately counted fewer people as recovered than as symptomatically remitted. The contrast is clinically important: feeling much better and having the resources to build a secure life are connected achievements that may progress at different rates. Zanarini and colleagues, 2010.
Can someone no longer meet the criteria for BPD?
Yes. People who once met formal diagnostic criteria can later fall below the threshold for an extended period. In the categorical DSM-5-TR approach, that can be described as symptomatic remission after proper reassessment. The ICD-11 instead places primary emphasis on severity of personality dysfunction and trait features, with an optional borderline pattern qualifier. Change in a historical DSM-based symptom count should therefore not be treated as identical to a change in ICD-11 personality-disorder severity. Both approaches direct clinicians to reassess the person's current functioning rather than treat an old diagnosis as an immutable identity. WHO ICD-11 clinical guidance.
What percentage of people with BPD recover? The long-term evidence
The answer depends on whether researchers are measuring symptoms at one point, ever achieving remission across years, sustaining remission without recurrence, or recovering both clinically and functionally. These statistics cannot be freely exchanged. The most informative designs follow the same participants through repeated structured interviews; their limitations include loss to follow-up, variation in treatment, and recruitment from populations with different levels of severity.
Meta-analysis: approximately 50%–70% long-term symptom remission
Álvarez-Tomás and colleagues synthesized eleven prospective studies involving 837 adults across nine countries, each with at least five years of follow-up. Roughly 50%–70% of people achieved long-term symptomatic remission, depending on the study. Depressive symptoms declined and functioning improved on average, though functional improvement was relatively modest. The authors found substantial heterogeneity and insufficient evidence to attribute the observed long-term course to any specific initial treatment. These are findings in studied clinical populations rather than a probability that can be assigned to an individual. European Psychiatry meta-analysis.
CLPS: 85% achieved at least a year of symptom remission during ten years
The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS) followed 175 treatment-seeking adults with BPD as part of a larger comparison sample. Across ten years, 85% attained a period of remission lasting at least twelve months under the study definition of fewer than two BPD criteria; 91% attained a shorter two-month remission. Among those who achieved a twelve-month remission, the cumulative recurrence estimate was approximately 11%. These cumulative figures ask whether remission occurred at some time during follow-up; they do not mean 85% of all people were symptom-free at every assessment. Gunderson and colleagues, 2011.
The same study found considerable persistence of impairment in social functioning despite the large decrease in symptom counts. On average, fewer symptoms predicted some later improvement in functioning, but that improvement was more modest than the change in diagnostic status. The authors concluded that the prognosis of clinical symptoms and the prognosis of everyday functioning should be evaluated separately. CLPS ten-year findings.
McLean: 93% experienced two-year remission; 50% attained broad recovery
The McLean Study of Adult Development initially recruited 290 psychiatric inpatients with BPD. Over a ten-year follow-up, 93% attained symptomatic remission lasting at least two years and 86% attained remission lasting at least four years. However, only 50% met the more demanding definition of recovery, combining symptom remission with good social and vocational functioning during the preceding two years. Among those who attained recovery, 34% subsequently lost that combined status. Zanarini and colleagues, 2010.
The investigators also distinguished later recurrence of diagnostic symptoms: approximately 30% of those with two-year symptom remission experienced a recurrence, compared with approximately 15% of those with four-year remission. Some participants lost recovery through worsening work or social circumstances rather than a return of full diagnostic symptoms. These are different kinds of change, and careful interpretation avoids turning a lapse in occupational functioning into an unsupported claim of diagnostic relapse. McLean ten-year results.
Sixteen- and twenty-year research: improvement can persist, but functioning matters
Longer McLean follow-ups continued to find considerable sustained remission while documenting the difficulty some participants faced in achieving lasting social and vocational stability. A sixteen-year investigation explicitly distinguished sustained symptom remission from sustained recovery. A later twenty-year investigation examined a more stringent outcome termed excellent recovery and related it to baseline factors such as work history and selected psychological measures. These associations are useful for research and service planning, but they cannot determine the fate of any individual patient. Sixteen-year study; twenty-year study.
Why these studies give different percentages
An inpatient cohort recruited during an earlier era of care is different from an outpatient sample or a community group. Some studies require a brief period below the symptom threshold, whereas others require two or more consecutive years. A cumulative probability of ever attaining remission increases as observation time lengthens; a point-prevalence proportion answers another question. Diagnostic interviews, definitions of occupational functioning, available psychotherapy, and treatment of other disorders also vary. Pooling percentages from incompatible outcomes produces misleading certainty.
Long-term observational research is especially strong for describing trajectories and much weaker for proving that a specific intervention caused a particular twenty-year outcome. Participants generally receive a changing mixture of psychotherapy, medication, social support, and other care. The observed improvements should not be called a controlled demonstration of spontaneous remission or a test of a single treatment method. Álvarez-Tomás and colleagues.
Which BPD symptoms often improve?
Emotional intensity, impulsive behavior, and responses to stress
Emotion regulation can become more flexible through learning, clinical support, changes in circumstances, and maturation. A person may recognize distress earlier, reduce harmful reactions, recover more quickly after disagreements, or tolerate uncertainty without acting impulsively. Longitudinal CLPS analyses found declines across all nine historical DSM-IV BPD symptom criteria, although the pattern and speed of improvement varied between people. Symptom change may be gradual, intermittent, and meaningful well before formal diagnostic remission. Gunderson and colleagues.
Suicidal thoughts and self-harm are serious potential clinical concerns in some people with BPD, but neither experience is universal. A diagnosis does not by itself establish current dangerousness. Someone with previous self-harm who now feels safe and has effective coping strategies should be assessed differently from someone experiencing immediate suicidal intent. Risk evaluation must be individualized and responsive to current circumstances. APA practice guideline; NICE BPD guideline.
Identity and self-direction
Changes in personality functioning can be described through identity and self-direction. Identity includes experiencing a coherent and relatively continuous sense of self, including strengths, vulnerabilities, preferences, and roles. Self-direction includes setting goals, acting in ways that align with personal values, and adjusting plans while maintaining a sense of agency. Improvement may look like preserving self-worth after criticism, pursuing education despite fluctuations in mood, and making important decisions without needing an immediate emotional emergency to be resolved first.
Empathy and intimacy
Empathy involves understanding other people's experiences while distinguishing their feelings from one's own. Intimacy includes mutuality, trust, boundaries, and the capacity to maintain connections despite disagreement. Recovery may make room for relationships in which intense feelings are communicated rather than acted out, boundaries can be renegotiated, and a temporary separation is less likely to become an overwhelming threat. A relationship's success still depends on both participants and their environment. These capacities deserve direct treatment attention when clinically relevant.
Psychosocial functioning may remain impaired after symptom remission
Rebuilding work history, education, housing security, or sustained social networks can take longer than reducing symptom counts. Years of crisis may interrupt qualifications, employment, friendships, or physical healthcare. Supportive employment programs, skills training, accessible education, financial assistance, and community connection may become appropriate components of recovery. A ten-year McLean report identified occupational difficulty as a major reason psychosocial functioning remained impaired for some patients. Prospective psychosocial-functioning study.
Financial instability, discrimination, structural barriers to care, chronic illness, trauma exposure, and caregiving demands can affect functioning independently of BPD symptoms. These circumstances should be assessed rather than interpreted as evidence that a person lacks motivation or has a permanently impaired personality.
Does BPD improve with age?
Longitudinal studies often show falling symptom counts across adulthood, and the prospective meta-analysis associated younger age with a higher probability of later remission. That association does not mean people should wait for age to solve the disorder. Younger and older adults can need different support, and personal trajectories remain highly variable. Clinical attention is appropriate whenever symptoms, safety concerns, or functional impairment warrant it. Long-term meta-analysis.
Adolescents require age-sensitive assessments that distinguish persistent, impairing personality pathology from transient developmental responses. Interventions may address emotions, relationships, family communication, school functioning, and co-occurring disorders. In older adults, clinicians should also consider physical health, loss, isolation, substance use, and medication effects. Age alone is neither a diagnostic criterion nor a measure of recovery potential.
What influences the prognosis of borderline personality disorder?
Severity, functioning, and prior stability
Clinicians assess severity and persistence of symptoms, current social and occupational functioning, access to safe housing, protective relationships, coping skills, recent crises, and the person's treatment history. A pattern of improving functioning can be encouraging, while serious instability warrants active support. Research has associated particular baseline characteristics with later outcomes, but no validated combination of these factors provides a precise individual recovery clock. Twenty-year McLean investigation.
Co-occurring conditions and accurate diagnosis
Depression, PTSD, substance use disorders, eating disorders, anxiety, insomnia, and other conditions may increase distress or complicate participation in treatment when present. They deserve independent assessment instead of being automatically attributed to BPD. Careful evaluation also matters for episodic mood disorders and dissociative conditions. Our Bipolar Disorder vs Borderline Personality Disorder: How Clinicians Distinguish Them covers the distinct question of distinguishing BPD patterns from manic or hypomanic episodes.
The meaning of trauma history is also individualized. Some people with BPD report significant adversity; others do not. Trauma exposure, temperament, development, social context, and learning experiences can interact, but a single causal account cannot establish the diagnosis or forecast recovery. Good prognosis assessment recognizes changing circumstances and the effects of appropriate care.
Treatment access, relationships, and social opportunities
Recovery is shaped in part by whether care is affordable, culturally responsive, stable, and appropriate for the individual. Regular appointments may be difficult when someone faces housing insecurity, disability, child-care responsibilities, or a long commute. Clinicians can collaborate on practical barriers, treatment intensity, crisis alternatives, peer support, and continuity of care. Social context is relevant to prognosis without being a deterministic explanation.
Which treatments help people with BPD recover?
Structured psychotherapy is the central evidence-based approach
The American Psychiatric Association's 2024 practice guideline recommends a structured form of psychotherapy supported by research and addressing core BPD features. It also recommends a documented, comprehensive, person-centered treatment plan and collaborative discussion of diagnosis and care. Treatment should account for strengths, preferences, safety, co-occurring conditions, and the person's own objectives. APA BPD guideline.
Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) often develops mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, and interpersonal effectiveness, with special attention to unsafe or crisis-driven behavior where present. Mentalization-based treatment (MBT) helps a person reflect on their own and others' mental states under interpersonal stress. Schema therapy addresses entrenched emotional and relational patterns. Transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) uses a structured therapeutic relationship to examine recurring self-and-other representations. The relevance of each intervention depends on the clinical formulation, competence of the therapist, feasibility, and patient preference.
A Cochrane review found evidence that BPD-focused psychological therapies can improve several outcomes compared with treatment as usual, while emphasizing uncertainty and variation in evidence quality. A 2023 network meta-analysis compared psychotherapies across forty-three randomized studies and found that evidence networks and direct comparisons remain uneven; the data do not justify proclaiming one psychotherapy universally best for all people with BPD. Cochrane review; network meta-analysis.
Recovery often requires goals beyond symptom control
Therapy can be organized around both clinical and functional targets. Early priorities may include staying safe, improving distress tolerance, building a therapeutic relationship, treating depression, or reducing crises. Later phases may place greater emphasis on pursuing education, recovering from employment disruption, developing social connections, and supporting independence. These phases may overlap. NICE recommends collaborative planning and attention to occupational as well as clinical outcomes. NICE care recommendations.
Are medications a cure for BPD?
No medication has been established as a stand-alone cure for the core personality disorder. The APA suggests that psychotropic medications used for BPD should be adjunctive to psychotherapy, directed at specific measurable target symptoms, and time-limited. The guideline also recommends reviewing co-occurring diagnoses and past medication responses before prescribing. NICE discourages using medication specifically for BPD or its individual symptoms and cautions against medium- or long-term antipsychotic treatment solely for BPD. Medicines may be indicated for separately diagnosed disorders; prescribing and discontinuation decisions belong in a medical consultation. APA guidance; NICE guidance.
What if a person does not have access to specialist therapy?
Care should still be organized around clinical needs and available services. A licensed professional may help coordinate risk management, evidence-informed psychological skills, evaluation of other psychiatric or medical conditions, referrals, and practical support. Patient-centered continuity and treatment engagement matter. Limited access to a specialist program must not be interpreted as an individual's failure to recover; accessibility is a health-system issue that should inform the plan.
How long does BPD recovery take?
There is no universal schedule. Some treatment studies detect clinically meaningful improvements during months of structured therapy, whereas occupational and relational rehabilitation may unfold over years. Longitudinal studies report results after two, ten, sixteen, or twenty years because those are their chosen observation windows—not because every patient requires that amount of treatment. Progress should be measured over agreed time intervals and across several domains instead of by one arbitrary deadline. APA guideline; CLPS follow-up.
Someone may achieve symptomatic remission and continue to benefit from follow-up focused on employment, health, relationships, or other co-occurring conditions. Another person may remain symptomatic while achieving important improvements in safety and quality of life. Recovery can be recognized in both cases, provided clinical descriptions remain precise about what has changed.
Can BPD relapse or recur after remission?
Yes. Cohort studies document a possibility of diagnostic symptom recurrence, and the estimated rate depends on how long the preceding remission lasted and how relapse is defined. The McLean study found lower recurrence after four years of remission than after two. The CLPS reported a relatively low recurrence rate after a full year of remission. A difficult day, renewed fear of rejection, or brief period of emotional intensity is not automatically a return to full diagnostic status. Zanarini et al.; Gunderson et al..
When functioning worsens, clinicians can revisit the situation: Have there been major losses, sleep disruption, changes in housing, worsening depression, substance use, or new threats to safety? Does the person need changes in treatment intensity or a refreshed crisis plan? A recurrence does not erase prior learning, relationships, or clinical progress. The task is to understand present needs and respond appropriately.
A practical, individualized plan for BPD recovery
Set measurable goals that are meaningful to the person
A useful plan begins with the person's own priorities and a structured clinical evaluation. For one person, the central goal may be fewer unsafe behaviors; for another, it may be consistent school attendance, a stable sense of identity, or the ability to disagree with a partner without prolonged emotional crisis. Clinicians can record baseline symptoms and functioning, define practical steps, and evaluate progress collaboratively. APA guideline.
Measure both symptoms and daily functioning
Tracking can include frequency and severity of distress, impulsive acts, quality of sleep, social participation, work or study attendance, perceived quality of life, and important co-occurring conditions. Standardized self-report measures may help monitor changes, but scoring a checklist does not diagnose or rule out a personality disorder. Regular clinical reassessment is especially important when the individual's presentation is changing.
Practice skills between appointments
Depending on the selected therapy, practicing emotional awareness, paced responses, tolerating uncertainty, seeking assistance early, or communicating boundaries can strengthen learning in everyday circumstances. Consistent routines and supportive relationships may help. Skills practice is an adjunct to appropriate clinical care when symptoms or safety concerns are significant, and it need not be perfected to represent progress.
Plan for setbacks and transitions
Patients and clinicians can establish warning signs, available support, crisis contacts, and how to resume care after interruption. Changes in jobs, relationships, housing, or treatment providers may deserve additional planning. When symptoms recur, revising a collaborative plan is often more useful than framing the episode as evidence that recovery was illusory.
Include practical rehabilitation when needed
Support can include occupational rehabilitation, accommodations, school re-entry, housing services, financial counseling, and opportunities for valued social participation. The persistent functional impairment documented by long-term studies makes these domains central to a complete recovery framework. Goals should be chosen with the person's preferences and circumstances in view, not imposed by a standardized image of the ideal life. Longitudinal psychosocial findings.
Safety and suicidal risk during recovery
Some individuals with BPD experience self-harm or suicidal ideation, while others never do. A history of distressing behavior, current passive thoughts, active suicidal intent, and immediate danger are clinically different situations requiring appropriate assessment. Risk can change over time, including when there is significant interpersonal stress, substance use, or another mental health condition. The presence of a BPD diagnosis never substitutes for an individual safety assessment. APA guideline; NICE risk guidance.
A crisis or safety plan can specify warning signs, coping strategies, professional contacts, supportive people, and steps to take if safety worsens. If someone is in immediate danger, local emergency services or emergency medical care are appropriate. In the United States, calling or texting 988 connects to the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. Emergency help remains available whether or not the person has a formal diagnosis.
How family members and partners can support recovery
Family members and partners can offer respectful listening, predictable communication, reasonable boundaries, and encouragement to follow a mutually agreed care plan. Psychoeducation can help loved ones understand that intense distress is meaningful without assuming that every disagreement results from a diagnosis. Support can be firm about safety and mutual needs while protecting the person's dignity and agency.
A partner cannot replace qualified clinical treatment or determine whether someone has BPD based on social-media descriptions. Family involvement in treatment should follow consent and professional judgment. Where interpersonal conflict is significant, attention to safety, boundaries, and support for everyone involved is essential. NICE guidance on families and carers.
Common myths about BPD recovery
“Borderline personality disorder is permanent and untreatable”
This assertion contradicts the long-term evidence of substantial remission and the recommendations for structured psychotherapy. Some impairments can persist and deserve ongoing services, but the diagnostic label does not define a fixed lifetime trajectory. Meta-analysis; APA guideline.
“Remission means that every problem has disappeared”
Diagnostic remission concerns particular criteria and durations. Someone may no longer meet them while continuing to manage depression, trauma-related symptoms, occupational disruption, relationship stress, or physical illness. Functional recovery and quality of life deserve separate attention.
“One setback means all progress is lost”
A period of renewed distress can occur within a longer improving trajectory. Clinical recurrence requires defined symptom thresholds and duration; a difficult argument or emotional reaction is not by itself diagnostic relapse. Appropriate reassessment and treatment adjustment preserve a realistic view of progress.
“Everyone diagnosed with BPD has the same risk or behavior”
BPD presentations are heterogeneous. Self-harm, suicide risk, unstable relationships, and impulsive behavior cannot be presumed in any individual. Terms such as “quiet BPD” are popular descriptions rather than independent DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnoses. The clinical task is to understand the person's actual symptoms, functioning, safety, and strengths.
Frequently asked questions about BPD prognosis
Can borderline personality disorder be cured completely?
The word “cure” has no standardized meaning in most long-term BPD studies. Sustained symptomatic remission and substantial functional recovery are documented outcomes. A person may build a stable, satisfying life and no longer meet diagnostic criteria; future stress or vulnerability does not invalidate that improvement. Medical follow-up should be based on present needs, rather than claims of guaranteed permanent immunity from distress.
What is the chance of recovering from BPD?
Across eleven long-term prospective studies, approximately 50%–70% of participants reached symptomatic remission. In one ten-year hospitalized cohort, 93% attained a period of two-year remission, while 50% met the more demanding combination of remission and good social and vocational functioning. The difference reflects the definitions and sampling methods. Neither estimate predicts the outcome for a specific individual. Álvarez-Tomás et al.; Zanarini et al..
Can BPD go away without treatment?
Longitudinal samples include people who received varied interventions, and symptoms often decreased over time. These observations do not establish what would happen to a specific untreated individual, because treatment and life experiences were not experimentally controlled. Structured psychotherapy is recommended for ongoing clinically significant BPD symptoms, and immediate safety needs should always be addressed. APA guideline.
Can people with BPD have healthy relationships?
Yes. People with a history of BPD can develop reciprocal, stable relationships. Improvements may involve emotional regulation, perspective-taking, communication, mutual respect, and boundary-setting. Other people's behavior and the safety of the surrounding relationship also matter; success cannot be reduced to one participant's diagnosis.
Can someone with BPD work, study, or raise children?
A diagnosis alone cannot determine a person's capacity to work, study, or parent. Functioning varies considerably between individuals and across life stages. Assessment should identify the person's actual abilities and support needs, including accommodations and community resources when appropriate, instead of relying on stereotypes.
How can someone tell whether they are recovering?
Look for sustained changes in distress, safety, ability to pursue goals, quality of relationships, daily routines, participation in valued activities, and personal quality of life. A clinician can combine self-report, structured measurements, observations over time, and discussion of what matters most to the person. Symptom questionnaires can help monitor change, but cannot independently confirm a diagnosis or its remission. APA care-planning recommendations.
Will BPD inevitably worsen after a breakup or major stress?
No. Stressful events can intensify symptoms for some people, yet outcomes depend on current circumstances, coping strategies, protective relationships, access to care, and co-occurring conditions. Early clinical support and a personalized plan may be useful during major transitions. A temporary increase in distress does not establish a permanent change in prognosis.
Related Articles
For the clinical distinction between BPD patterns and episodic mood disorders, see Bipolar Disorder vs Borderline Personality Disorder: How Clinicians Distinguish Them. For assessment of dissociative symptoms, read DID vs Borderline Personality Disorder: Symptoms and Diagnostic Differences. For a separate analysis of dimensional personality traits, see Neuroticism and Borderline Personality Disorder: Trait Models and Clinical Diagnosis.
For the broader cross-diagnosis outlook beyond borderline personality disorder, compare Personality Disorders: Long-Term Outcomes and Recovery.
References
Álvarez-Tomás, I., Ruiz, J., Guilera, G., & Bados, A. (2019). Long-term clinical and functional course of borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. European Psychiatry, 56, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.10.010.
American Psychiatric Association. (2024). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. Guideline DOI.
Gunderson, J. G., Stout, R. L., McGlashan, T. H., et al. (2011). Ten-year course of borderline personality disorder: Psychopathology and function from the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.37.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2009; current online recommendations). Borderline personality disorder: Recognition and management (CG78). Recommendations.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Borderline personality disorder. Official patient information.
Setkowski, K., et al. (2023). Which psychotherapy is most effective and acceptable in the treatment of adults with a (sub)clinical borderline personality disorder? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723000685.
Storebø, O. J., Stoffers-Winterling, J. M., Völlm, B. A., et al. (2020). Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD012955. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. WHO clinical manual.
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2010a). The 10-year course of psychosocial functioning among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. DOI.
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2010b). Time to attainment of recovery from borderline personality disorder and stability of recovery: A 10-year prospective follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 663–667. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09081130.
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2012). Attainment and stability of sustained symptomatic remission and recovery among patients with borderline personality disorder and axis II comparison subjects: A 16-year prospective follow-up study. American Journal of Psychiatry. PubMed record.
Zanarini, M. C., Temes, C. M., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., & Fitzmaurice, G. M. (2018). Description and prediction of time-to-attainment of excellent recovery for borderline patients followed prospectively for 20 years. Psychiatry Research, 262, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.034.