Complicated Grief vs Prolonged Grief Disorder: Terminology and Diagnosis

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Grief, Loss & Bereavement · Written by Artificial Sapiens

Complicated grief and prolonged grief disorder (PGD) refer to overlapping concerns about persistent, severely distressing grief after a death. The distinction is a matter of diagnostic history, scientific measurement, and clinical classification. Complicated grief is an older descriptive and research term used with several proposed definitions. Prolonged grief disorder is the current formal diagnosis in both the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5-TR and the World Health Organization's ICD-11. Although the systems share this name, their diagnostic requirements differ. American Psychiatric Association · World Health Organization

This distinction matters when a reader encounters an older mental health record, a questionnaire, a psychotherapy study, or a claim that complicated grief has simply been renamed. Some definitions of complicated grief and PGD identify similar people, while particular historical diagnostic tests identify different groups. In practice, a clinician must evaluate the individual's symptoms, functioning, context, and applicable diagnostic criteria rather than infer a disorder from a label. Maciejewski et al., 2016 · Treml et al., 2024

Complicated Grief vs Prolonged Grief Disorder: The Essential Difference

Complicated grief is a historically important research and clinical expression. It has described unusually persistent and impairing grief and, in specific studies, a proposed syndrome operationalized through particular symptoms or questionnaires. It is not the name of the current formal DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnosis.

Prolonged grief disorder is the official contemporary diagnostic name. It concerns bereavement after the death of someone close, persistent yearning for or preoccupation with the deceased, associated distress, functional consequences, duration, and cultural context. DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 specify these requirements differently. Both focus on a pattern that is more clinically significant than ordinary variation in grief. American Psychiatric Association · NHS Scotland

The terminology is often interchangeable in informal clinical conversation, but it is not interchangeable in research methodology. A study's exact inclusion criteria, instrument, symptom algorithm, and timeframe determine what its findings support. This article explains the terminology and diagnostic transition; the full clinical description belongs to Prolonged Grief Disorder: Symptoms and Diagnosis.

What Does Complicated Grief Mean?

The term complicated grief gained influence during the 1990s as clinicians and researchers described people whose bereavement reactions remained exceptionally intense and disabling. Their observations raised an important question: why did some people experience persistent yearning, preoccupation, and profound disruptions in functioning when many others gradually adapted to the death, although they continued to miss the person? Nakajima, 2018

The term subsequently acquired different uses. In ordinary clinical language, complicated grief could describe a bereavement that felt unusually difficult. In research, it often referred to a defined symptom pattern and a particular measurement procedure. In treatment trials, complicated grief identified the population for whom specialized psychotherapy was being tested. These uses resemble one another but do not automatically represent one uniform diagnosis.

The historical Inventory of Complicated Grief and related measures helped researchers examine symptoms and severity. Their names continue to appear in publications and clinical services. A score from a historical measure cannot automatically be translated into a DSM-5-TR PGD diagnosis, because instruments and diagnostic algorithms were developed for different purposes.

One influential study comparing competing formulations found that a particular complicated-grief algorithm classified considerably more people than several proposed PGD or persistent complex bereavement disorder algorithms. This result concerns those specific tests rather than proving that every person described informally as having complicated grief has a distinct condition from PGD. Maciejewski et al., 2016

Why clinicians still use the expression

Medical records may preserve older vocabulary. Some therapists continue to use the established name complicated grief treatment for an intervention investigated before modern PGD criteria were formalized. Bereavement organizations may use a familiar phrase that readers recognize. Scientific databases still index influential trials under complicated grief. Interpretation therefore requires the reader to distinguish everyday description, formal diagnosis, research inclusion rules, and intervention names.

What Is Prolonged Grief Disorder?

Prolonged grief disorder is a recognized clinical condition following the death of a close person. Its defining concern is a persistent and pervasive grief response centered on the deceased, especially intense yearning or continuing preoccupation, accompanied by emotional distress or impairment that exceeds what is expected in the person's social and cultural setting. Feelings that life has lost its meaning, difficulty accepting the death, intense loneliness, emotional numbness, and difficulty engaging in relationships or daily responsibilities may occur. American Psychiatric Association

Both major classification systems agree that some bereaved people experience a severe, enduring, clinically significant disturbance. The WHO's ICD-11 offers an international clinical classification, while the APA's DSM-5-TR specifies a more structured symptom-count algorithm. The distinction between these systems affects research prevalence estimates, diagnostic agreement, and assessment practices. Treml et al., 2024

The diagnosis does not impose a deadline for remembering or missing someone. Deep love, strong continuing bonds, anniversary reactions, dreams, rituals, and sadness can remain parts of an adapted life. A formal assessment is concerned with the overall pattern of symptoms, their persistence and consequences, and contextual expectations.

A Brief History of the Terminology

Early proposed grief syndromes

Researchers initially described severe grief reactions using expressions such as pathological grief, traumatic grief, chronic grief, and complicated grief. Various proposed criteria emphasized different combinations of yearning, intrusive thoughts, disbelief, avoidance, emotional pain, and life disruption. The scientific debate concerned whether these experiences formed a distinct clinical syndrome, how to distinguish them from other diagnoses, and which thresholds performed best. Prigerson et al., 2009 · Prigerson et al., 2021

Complicated grief treatment studies

A series of clinical trials evaluated specialized psychotherapy in people recruited under complicated-grief criteria. A randomized trial by Shear and colleagues compared complicated grief treatment with interpersonal psychotherapy, providing early evidence for a focused therapeutic approach. Later studies evaluated treatment in older people and tested combinations with medication. Those studies retain the historical label in their titles because it identifies the conditions under which the research was conducted. Shear et al., 2005 · Shear et al., 2016

Persistent complex bereavement disorder in DSM-5

The 2013 DSM-5 introduced persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD) as a condition for further study in Section III. It provided a research framework for investigating persistent, severe grief, and it was not the same formal diagnostic classification that DSM-5-TR later adopted. Studies comparing PCBD with proposed PGD definitions found substantial overlap as well as clinically relevant discrepancies in their symptom and prevalence calculations. American Psychiatric Association · Boelen et al., 2019

Prolonged grief disorder becomes the formal name

WHO incorporated prolonged grief disorder into ICD-11, and the APA published DSM-5-TR with PGD as a formal diagnosis in 2022. DSM-5-TR placed the disorder in the trauma- and stressor-related disorders chapter. The shared term improved communication while leaving differences between the systems in minimum duration, symptom organization, and diagnostic algorithms. American Psychiatric Association, 2022 · Treml et al., 2024

DSM-5-TR Criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder

DSM-5-TR requires the death of someone close at least 12 months previously for adults and at least six months previously for children and adolescents. The central symptoms are intense yearning or longing for the deceased, persistent preoccupation with memories or thoughts of the deceased, or both. The core symptom must occur at a clinically significant level, nearly every day for at least the last month. In young people, preoccupation may concern the circumstances of the death. American Psychiatric Association

In addition, at least three of eight associated symptoms must be present at the specified clinically significant frequency. These include identity disruption, disbelief about the death, avoidance of reminders that the person has died, intense emotional pain related to the death, difficulty reintegrating into life, emotional numbness, feeling that life is meaningless without the person, and intense loneliness or detachment. The precise pattern and frequency matter; isolated symptoms are common in ordinary grief. American Psychiatric Association

The overall disturbance must cause clinically significant distress or impairment and persist beyond expected social, cultural, or religious norms. The clinician must also consider whether symptoms are better explained by another psychiatric condition, a substance, or a medical condition. A minimum number of months, a few painful memories, or crying frequently therefore cannot establish PGD on their own.

Is one year the limit for normal grief?

The 12-month DSM-5-TR threshold in adults is a minimum time since the death before this diagnosis can be made. It is not a maximum acceptable length for mourning. Some people remember the deceased with deep sadness throughout their lives while functioning meaningfully and retaining valued connections. Others need professional support much earlier than one year for severe distress, trauma symptoms, depression, or urgent safety concerns. A person's needs should be evaluated when they arise.

ICD-11 Criteria for Prolonged Grief Disorder

ICD-11 also requires bereavement after the death of someone close and persistent, pervasive yearning or preoccupation. It describes accompanying intense emotional pain, including experiences such as sadness, anger, guilt, denial, blame, difficulty accepting the death, feeling that part of oneself has been lost, inability to feel positive mood, emotional numbness, or difficulty engaging in social activities. World Health Organization

Under ICD-11 the response has continued for an atypically long period, at least six months, and markedly exceeds expected norms within the person's social, cultural, or religious context. The disturbance causes significant impairment in important areas of functioning. ICD-11 uses a clinical descriptive formulation and does not impose the DSM-5-TR requirement of three among its exact eight additional symptoms. NHS Scotland · Treml et al., 2024

Researchers sometimes impose additional symptom-count algorithms when translating ICD-11 descriptions into survey classifications. Those methods should be identified as research operationalizations. A screening algorithm that uses one accompanying symptom will not necessarily classify the same number of people as a stricter research algorithm.

Comparing DSM-5-TR and ICD-11

Duration since the death

DSM-5-TR requires at least 12 months in adults and six months in children and adolescents. ICD-11 requires at least six months and a period that exceeds cultural and contextual expectations. These numbers concern the diagnostic classification, not a prescribed period for bereaved people to recover.

Symptom structure

Both emphasize persistent longing or preoccupation. DSM-5-TR prescribes an additional three-of-eight associated symptom threshold and recent symptom-frequency requirements. ICD-11 relies on persistent pervasive grief, accompanying intense emotional pain, marked impairment, and contextual excess without duplicating that exact algorithm.

Clinical significance

Both systems attend to more than the existence of grief. Severity, persistence, distress, meaningful disruption, and contextual understanding determine why diagnosis is considered. Neither system treats loving memories, sadness on an anniversary, or maintaining a continuing bond as an automatic sign of pathology.

Research consequences

Studies can report different PGD rates merely because they apply different diagnostic rules. In a population-based German study, Treml and colleagues reported different prevalence estimates under DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 approaches; agreement improved when researchers adjusted the minimum accompanying symptoms for the ICD-11 operationalization. Such studies support specifying the exact criteria instead of reporting PGD as if it had one universal case-finding algorithm. Treml et al., 2024

Are Complicated Grief and PGD Actually the Same?

At the level of clinical concern they overlap closely: both draw attention to persistent and impairing bereavement centered on the deceased. At the level of formal diagnosis the current label is PGD. At the level of scientific measurement, their relationship varies with the exact definition used. There is no sound basis for translating every complicated grief score into a contemporary PGD diagnosis without examining symptoms and criteria. Eisma, 2023

Maciejewski and colleagues found different classification patterns when they compared historical candidate tests in one sample. Boelen and colleagues subsequently compared six proposed criteria sets and found variation in symptom structures and probable-case estimates. The practical implication is that papers and treatment reports should name their criteria and assessment method, not simply their preferred terminology. Maciejewski et al., 2016 · Boelen et al., 2020

For the individual seeking care, the label alone matters less than a clinician's clear explanation of the pattern, functional consequences, possible alternative diagnoses, and evidence-based support options. A clinician should explain whether complicated grief is merely a descriptive shorthand or a reference to formally assessed PGD.

Normal Grief, Bereavement, Mourning, and Diagnosis

Bereavement means having lost someone through death. Grief encompasses emotional, physical, cognitive, relational, and behavioral reactions to loss. Mourning concerns the personal and socially organized ways grief is expressed, including rituals and practices. PGD is a particular diagnosis involving persistent, impairing bereavement-related distress. These definitions protect the wide range of human responses to death from indiscriminate medical classification. National Cancer Institute

Ordinary grief can be profoundly intense. It can involve disbelief, crying, anger, numbness, loneliness, disturbed sleep, fatigue, changes in appetite, and difficulty concentrating. Feelings may fluctuate, disappear for hours or days, or return suddenly in response to reminders. It is common for a meaningful anniversary to increase sorrow even after long periods of adjustment.

An observer cannot infer a disorder from funeral customs, prolonged remembrance, visiting a grave, talking aloud to the deceased, keeping photographs, experiencing dreams, or periodically feeling that the deceased is present. A continuing bond can be compatible with adjustment and meaningful life. Clinical assessment examines the overall pattern and effects on functioning. See Grief: Psychological Responses to Loss.

Similarly, popular stages-of-grief accounts are not formal diagnostic tests and do not prescribe a uniform sequence through which everyone must pass. People respond according to their relationship, circumstances, resources, age, culture, and personal history. For the broader timeline, see How Long Does Grief Last? Timelines, Waves, and Adjustment.

What May Contribute to Persistent, Impairing Grief?

Psychological models examine the ongoing relationship between attachment, memories of the death, altered identity, avoidance of painful reminders, practical demands, and attempts to reconstruct a life after loss. For some people, these processes interact with isolation, financial strain, family conflict, or difficulties adapting to changed responsibilities. Such models help frame treatment, but no single psychological mechanism is sufficient to diagnose PGD. Szuhany et al., 2021

Some studies identify higher risks following sudden or violent deaths, major relational losses, previous mental health problems, and limited social support. These are group-level associations, not a diagnostic checklist or a prediction about an individual. A person with no apparent risk factors may still need specialist care; someone who loses a partner or child does not automatically develop a psychiatric disorder. American Psychiatric Association

How Professionals Assess Complicated Grief and PGD

Assessment begins with a careful history: who died, when and how the death occurred, the meaning of the relationship, current circumstances, cultural expectations, and the person's own account of what has changed. The clinician considers symptom frequency and intensity, longing or preoccupation, avoidance, emotional pain, identity, sleep, work or school, relationships, practical functioning, and support. Any diagnosis requires attention to physical health, substances, psychiatric history, and relevant concurrent disorders.

Next, the assessor identifies the specific criteria set. Using DSM-5-TR PGD requires a check of its age-dependent time threshold, central symptoms, recent frequency, associated symptom count, functional impact, contextual expectations, and exclusions. Using ICD-11 involves its own descriptive and temporal formulation. Merely writing complicated grief on a chart does not demonstrate that either process occurred. American Psychiatric Association · Treml et al., 2024

Can a questionnaire diagnose PGD?

Questionnaires such as the Inventory of Complicated Grief, PG-13-related measures, and the Traumatic Grief Inventory family were created or refined around different constructs and diagnostic proposals. They can document symptom severity, indicate a need for further evaluation, or follow changes during care. Their scoring systems, validation populations, and correspondence with DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 vary. Szuhany et al., 2021 · Treml et al., 2024

A high score is a screening signal, not a stand-alone diagnosis. A low score does not settle safety concerns or automatically exclude other conditions. Interpretation requires clinical assessment, developmental and cultural understanding, and attention to the instrument's limitations.

Prolonged Grief Disorder vs Depression

PGD is organized around separation from the deceased, with persistent yearning or preoccupation. Major depressive disorder may involve a more pervasive depressed mood or loss of interest, reduced pleasure across many activities, feelings of worthlessness, and other characteristic depressive symptoms. Bereavement can contain features of both, and the two disorders can coexist. The clinician evaluates the quality and focus of distress, symptom distribution, functional consequences, and other diagnostic criteria. Szuhany et al., 2021

Grief-related sadness alone does not establish major depression, and depression cannot be dismissed merely because symptoms followed a death. The dedicated comparison is Prolonged Grief Disorder vs Depression.

Prolonged Grief Disorder vs PTSD

A traumatic death can involve exposure to life threat, horrific circumstances, or other qualifying trauma. PTSD concerns trauma-related symptoms such as intrusions, avoidance, altered mood or cognition, and threat-related arousal. PGD concerns persistent distress centered on the lost person and their absence. An individual may experience both trauma-related fear and attachment-related yearning, so careful assessment considers both rather than forcing one label. Szuhany et al., 2021

See Prolonged Grief Disorder vs PTSD for the full differential comparison.

Adjustment Disorder and Other Explanations

Adjustment disorder is another condition considered in response to an identifiable stressor, but it has different requirements and must be distinguished from PGD, depression, PTSD, and ordinary grief. Anxiety, sleep disorders, substance use, physical illness, and existing psychiatric conditions may change how bereavement is experienced. Diagnostic assessment looks for co-occurrence as well as alternative explanations.

The reason for differential diagnosis is practical: treatment and safety planning should address the individual's actual needs. A person might benefit from grief-focused treatment, trauma-focused therapy, depression care, practical support, or a combination, depending on the assessment.

Children, Adolescents, and Family Context

Children and adolescents can experience severe and impairing grief, but their symptoms may appear in school difficulties, behavioral changes, repeated questions, worries about surviving caregivers, anger, or developmental changes. Interpretation depends on age, family relationships, circumstances of the death, and the child's understanding of permanence. Adult symptom formulations and self-report measures should not be transferred without care.

The DSM-5-TR minimum time since death is six months for a child or adolescent. Preoccupation can involve the circumstances of the death. A comprehensive assessment may draw on the young person's account, appropriate caregiver information, and school functioning while respecting privacy, safety, and developmental capacities. American Psychiatric Association

See Prolonged Grief Disorder in Children and Teens: Signs and Assessment.

Cultural and Religious Contexts

Grief is shaped by cultural expectations, community rituals, spiritual practices, family obligations, and social structures. Some communities expect open expressions of mourning over substantial periods. Others value privacy or maintain relationships with deceased loved ones through regular ritual. The presence or absence of visible emotion is not a reliable proxy for diagnostic severity. Both DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 explicitly require attention to whether the response exceeds relevant social, cultural, or religious norms. World Health Organization

Cultural validity is an active scientific question. Research instruments have often been developed and tested in particular populations; the relevance of specific symptoms and duration rules may vary across settings. Emerging reviews question whether certain assumptions about mourning time and unusual experiences transfer readily between cultures. Clinicians should explore the person's own traditions and lived circumstances, not apply a simplistic universal timetable. Eisma, 2023 · Moore et al., 2025

Scientific Controversies About the Diagnosis

Research supports the existence of a subgroup with prolonged, impairing grief for whom specialized care can be useful. At the same time, scientists continue to debate the boundary between severe but expectable grief and a diagnosable disturbance, measurement validity, cultural generalizability, possible stigma, and overmedicalization. The history of PGD has included competing definitions and disagreement about how precisely to operationalize the clinical threshold. Prigerson et al., 2021 · Eisma, 2023

These debates matter because a diagnosis has social as well as clinical consequences. Thoughtful practice takes the suffering seriously, uses explicit diagnostic criteria, includes functioning and context, communicates uncertainty where it is clinically relevant, and avoids turning a screening score or time since death into an automatic label. People can receive support without a PGD diagnosis.

Treatment Evidence and Historical Labels

Historical randomized studies of complicated grief treatment remain relevant to grief-focused psychotherapy. They showed benefits in people recruited under the criteria prevailing at the time. Their findings cannot be mapped mechanically onto every current DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 population, because older trials may have used different thresholds. Shear et al., 2005 · Shear et al., 2016

Grief-focused psychotherapy may address persistent avoidance, distressing memories, restoration of daily life, identity, and reengagement with meaningful relationships and goals. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies found that grief-focused cognitive behavioral therapies reduced prolonged-grief symptoms, with important qualifications about evidence quality and heterogeneity. A 2025 systematic review similarly supported CBT-oriented approaches while identifying limits in representation and generalizability. Komischke-Konnerup et al., 2024 · Srivastava et al., 2025

Support groups, bereavement counseling, family assistance, community services, and spiritual care can serve valuable purposes. Their role differs from structured specialist treatment for an established clinical syndrome, and effectiveness evidence varies by approach and population. A person should be offered care that corresponds to their needs rather than being assigned a therapy purely on the basis of a historical label.

What about antidepressants?

Medication can be clinically appropriate for co-occurring major depression or other conditions after a proper assessment. Antidepressants have not been established as an equivalent stand-alone grief-specific treatment. In a randomized trial, adding citalopram to complicated grief treatment did not significantly improve the grief-specific response, although it helped certain co-occurring depressive symptoms. The original study's inclusion criteria should be considered in interpreting the findings. Shear et al., 2016

For fuller treatment evidence, read Prolonged Grief Disorder Treatment: Therapy and Current Evidence. For everyday support, read How to Cope With Grief: Evidence-Based Support.

When to Seek Professional Help

Grief support is appropriate whenever it is helpful; a person does not have to wait six or twelve months. Counseling, companionship, assistance with daily responsibilities, family conversations, and support for children can be valuable throughout bereavement. Someone experiencing overwhelming distress, persistent isolation, a substantial decline in functioning, or significant depression or trauma symptoms may benefit from clinical evaluation.

When the main problem remains severe, persistent, and centered on yearning or preoccupation with the deceased, a clinician familiar with PGD can consider the relevant diagnosis, cultural context, and evidence-based treatments. When symptoms suggest other disorders, those concerns should be assessed too. The aim is to clarify needs and provide meaningful care. American Psychiatric Association

If someone expresses suicidal intent, has a plan, may act soon, or cannot remain safe, seek immediate local emergency or crisis services. Stay with the person if safe, involve an appropriate trusted support person, and prioritize urgent professional evaluation. Suicidal thoughts require attention regardless of time since death or whether PGD diagnostic criteria are met. See Grief and Suicidal Thoughts: Support and Safety.

How to Interpret Older Research or Medical Records

Start with the year of publication and the research period. A study published in 2005 could not have enrolled people according to the finalized DSM-5-TR criteria introduced in 2022, though it may still provide useful clinical evidence.

Find the actual diagnostic instrument and criteria in the methods section. The heading may say complicated grief, traumatic grief, PGD, or PCBD, but the definition used to recruit participants determines the group studied. Check the minimum duration, symptom frequency, impairment criterion, and whether the sample came from clinical treatment seekers or a general-population survey.

Look for differential assessment of depression, PTSD, and other conditions. Compare the demographic and cultural composition with the population to which a claim is being applied. Treat prevalence figures carefully: different algorithms can change estimates even in the same sample. Boelen et al., 2020 · Treml et al., 2024

Finally, distinguish the label in the document from the individual's present clinical circumstances. A past note describing complicated grief may convey a meaningful history, but determining whether present-day DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 criteria are met requires an assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is complicated grief an official DSM-5-TR diagnosis?

The present formal name is prolonged grief disorder. Complicated grief is a historical and still-used research or clinical expression. DSM-5 previously included persistent complex bereavement disorder as a condition for further study; DSM-5-TR introduced the official PGD diagnosis. American Psychiatric Association

Is PGD the same as persistent complex bereavement disorder?

The concepts overlap, but PCBD was a DSM-5 research formulation and PGD is the contemporary diagnosis. Their detailed criteria are not identical, so they should be distinguished when evaluating studies and records. Boelen et al., 2019

Does grief become abnormal after one year?

No. The DSM-5-TR adult one-year threshold is a minimum interval for considering its diagnosis, accompanied by additional symptom, impairment, and contextual requirements. Grief itself has no universal deadline. American Psychiatric Association

Why does ICD-11 mention six months?

ICD-11 uses a minimum of six months, together with prolonged intensity beyond cultural or social expectations, significant impairment, and the relevant clinical pattern. It does not state that grief must end after six months. World Health Organization

Can someone have both PGD and major depression?

Yes. A person may meet the criteria for both. A clinician examines bereavement-focused yearning and preoccupation alongside depressive symptoms, their breadth, impairment, and clinical history. Szuhany et al., 2021

Can PGD and PTSD occur together?

Yes. Some bereaved people experience both persistent loss-centered grief and trauma-related fear or intrusive memories. Their treatments may need to address both clinical problems. Szuhany et al., 2021

Is complicated grief always more severe than PGD?

There is no consistent severity ranking based solely on the terms. Historical definitions captured different symptom patterns and populations. Clinical severity requires individual assessment. Maciejewski et al., 2016

Is continuing to speak to or remember the deceased a PGD symptom?

Such practices are common in bereavement and may express an ongoing meaningful bond. They are not diagnostic by themselves. Clinical concern depends on the wider, persistent and impairing symptom pattern.

Can a questionnaire alone diagnose prolonged grief disorder?

No. Questionnaires can support screening and monitoring, but a clinical diagnosis requires evaluation of applicable criteria, functioning, development, culture, and alternative explanations. Treml et al., 2024

Does complicated grief treatment still work under modern terminology?

Older randomized trials provide important evidence for specialized grief-focused therapies. More recent reviews support grief-focused cognitive behavioral approaches, while differences among trial populations and diagnostic criteria must be considered. Shear et al., 2016 · Srivastava et al., 2025

Can help begin before the minimum diagnostic interval?

Yes. Support, assessment of co-occurring conditions, and urgent safety care can begin immediately when indicated. A classification rule is not a reason to postpone care.

Conclusion

Complicated grief is an influential historical term for severe, enduring problems in bereavement, and different research traditions used it in different ways. Prolonged grief disorder is the current formal diagnosis in DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. Their distinct requirements, and the variation in older definitions, matter for understanding studies, treatment names, and medical records. Compassionate and competent care depends on the person's actual symptoms, functioning, needs, and cultural context.

Related Articles

Prolonged Grief Disorder: Symptoms and Diagnosis — full clinical and diagnostic guide.

Prolonged Grief Disorder Treatment: Therapy and Current Evidence — specialized psychotherapy and treatment evidence.

Prolonged Grief Disorder vs Depression — a focused differential comparison.

Prolonged Grief Disorder vs PTSD — loss-centered distress and traumatic stress.

Prolonged Grief Disorder in Children and Teens: Signs and Assessment — youth criteria and assessment.

Grief: Psychological Responses to Loss — the wider psychological experience of grief.

How to Cope With Grief: Evidence-Based Support — practical sources of support.

Grief and Suicidal Thoughts: Support and Safety — crisis and safety guidance.

Grief Screening vs Clinical Assessment

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Prolonged grief disorder: DSM-5-TR fact sheet. Official APA resource.

Boelen, P. A., et al. (2019). Further evaluation of the factor structure, prevalence, and concurrent validity of DSM-5 criteria for persistent complex bereavement disorder and ICD-11 criteria for prolonged grief disorder. Psychiatry Research, 273, 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.006.

Boelen, P. A., et al. (2020). Comparison of six proposed diagnostic criteria sets for disturbed grief. Psychiatry Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112786.

Eisma, M. C. (2023). Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR: Challenges and controversies. PubMed Central.

Komischke-Konnerup, K. B., Zachariae, R., Boelen, P. A., Marello, M. M., & O’Connor, M. (2024). Grief-focused cognitive behavioral therapies for prolonged grief symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 92(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000884.

Maciejewski, P. K., et al. (2016). Prolonged grief disorder and persistent complex bereavement disorder, but not complicated grief, are one and the same diagnostic entity: An analysis of data from the Yale Bereavement Study. World Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20348.

Moore, B. S., da Silva, J. P., & Farias, M. (2025). Diagnosing prolonged grief disorder: Cultural challenges to the DSM-5-TR criteria. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 49, 1504–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-025-09940-5.

Nakajima, S. (2018). Complicated grief: Recent developments in diagnostic criteria and treatment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. PubMed Central.

National Cancer Institute. (2024). Grief, bereavement, and coping with loss (PDQ): Health professional version. Official resource.

NHS Scotland. (2025). The Matrix: Prolonged grief disorder. Evidence summary.

Prigerson, H. G., et al. (2009). Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLOS Medicine, 6(8), e1000121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121.

Prigerson, H. G., Kakarala, S., Gang, J., & Maciejewski, P. K. (2021). History and status of prolonged grief disorder as a psychiatric diagnosis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081219-093600.

Shear, M. K., Frank, E., Houck, P. R., & Reynolds, C. F. (2005). Treatment of complicated grief: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 293(21), 2601–2608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2601.

Shear, M. K., et al. (2016). Optimizing treatment of complicated grief: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 73(7), 685–694. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0892.

Srivastava, T., et al. (2025). The efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions for prolonged grief disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 380, 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.173.

Szuhany, K. L., Young, K., & Simon, N. M. (2021). Prolonged grief disorder: Course, diagnosis, assessment, and treatment. PubMed Central.

Treml, J., Linde, K., Brähler, E., & Kersting, A. (2024). Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR: Differences in prevalence and diagnostic criteria. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1266132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1266132.

World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. Official WHO publication.