Binge Eating vs Overeating: How to Tell the Difference
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Eating Disorders & Disordered Eating · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Overeating and binge eating can look similar from the outside. Both may involve more food than a person expected to eat, but the essential clinical question concerns the experience of control. Overeating is an everyday description of eating more than intended or comfortable. A clinically defined binge-eating episode combines an objectively unusually large amount of food within a distinct period with feeling unable to stop or control eating. Repeated binge episodes accompanied by marked distress and additional features may be part of binge-eating disorder (BED), a recognized psychiatric diagnosis. An unusually large meal or occasional regret does not establish BED. The distinction is consistent with the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and an influential critical review of loss-of-control eating.
Imagine two people eating comparable amounts at a celebration. One enjoys another serving, becomes full, and moves on. The other feels swept along, cannot stop despite wanting to, and experiences significant distress afterward. The latter description raises questions about loss of control that the size of the meal cannot resolve. Context, recurrence, impairment, and associated behaviors determine whether professional eating-disorder assessment is appropriate. This guide explains how to interpret those distinctions without turning ordinary appetite, occasional overeating, or an online questionnaire into a diagnosis.
For a comprehensive discussion of the established diagnosis, see Binge Eating Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment. This comparison article focuses on recognizing the difference between everyday overeating, loss-of-control eating, and symptoms that merit assessment.
Binge Eating vs Overeating: The Main Differences
Overeating describes consuming more than planned, expected, or comfortable. It can occur during celebrations, with unusual hunger, at a restaurant, while distracted, or following a day with insufficient meals. Portions and needs vary with age, growth, activity, illness, and social setting. No single serving size can define overeating consistently across people and situations. Eating past comfortable fullness may cause temporary discomfort without amounting to a clinical symptom.
A clinical binge-eating episode includes both an objectively large amount of food for the circumstances in a discrete interval and a subjective sense of loss of control. Related experiences can include eating unusually quickly, continuing until uncomfortably full, eating when not physically hungry, hiding episodes, or feeling deeply upset afterward. Those associated experiences can also occur outside BED. A clinician assesses them as part of a whole pattern, rather than treating any one behavior as a diagnostic sign (NIDDK, Symptoms and Causes).
A further distinction matters. Researchers use the phrase subjective binge episode for an experience of loss of control when the amount consumed is not judged objectively large. Such episodes may be associated with substantial distress and eating-related difficulties. Objective and subjective episodes are separate assessment concepts, and neither is automatically a standalone diagnosis. Goldschmidt's 2017 review found that loss of control has meaningful associations with psychosocial and eating-related outcomes across ages, while measuring food quantity precisely remains difficult.
The Central Clue Is Loss of Control
Loss of control is a person's experience of being unable to regulate eating during an episode. Someone might want to stop yet continue, feel driven to eat, or describe their behavior as automatic. This experience can be intense even if the amount of food seems ordinary to another person. It is best understood through a description of what happened during the episode, including thoughts, bodily sensations, and the ability to make choices.
Eating more than intended is compatible with maintaining control. Someone might knowingly choose another dessert, eat because a dish tastes good, or have extra food because they missed a meal. Regret afterward can reflect rigid food rules, social pressure, or physical discomfort rather than an inability to stop. Conversely, a person may feel profoundly unable to stop eating while consuming an amount an outside observer considers modest.
Researchers have examined these constructs separately because food quantity and perceived control do not measure the same psychological phenomenon. The evidence summarized by Goldschmidt supports the clinical importance of loss of control, while also describing variation in measurement methods and limitations in determining objectively large meals. A person's experience deserves attention even when the full diagnostic criteria for an objective binge are absent.
The feeling of losing control is important information, but one episode is insufficient for a diagnosis. Sleep disruption, hunger after restriction, medications, emotional distress, physical illness, and other factors can influence eating. A comprehensive assessment seeks the explanation that fits the person's actual history and health.
Five Questions to Ask About an Episode
1. Did eating feel voluntary or impossible to interrupt?
Consider whether the person could choose to continue or stop eating. Having another serving because it was enjoyable differs from feeling compelled to continue despite an active wish to stop. Some people describe urgency or a sense of automatic behavior. Others notice that intentions become difficult to act on during the episode. A clinician explores the lived experience instead of inferring it from food quantity.
2. Was the amount clearly unusual for the situation?
Clinical definitions refer to a large amount within a discrete period relative to what most people would eat under comparable circumstances. A holiday meal, a long gap since the previous meal, adolescence, or strenuous activity may change the context. Counting servings by a universal rule does not provide a reliable answer. The research literature documents particular challenges in applying objective-size judgments to young people (Moustafa et al., 2021).
3. Did the episode produce marked psychological distress?
Distress may include fear of repeated loss of control, shame, secrecy, sadness, or interference with daily activities. Feeling physically full is a different experience. Guilt after eating can arise from stigma or dietary rules even without a binge. The evaluation considers whether distress is persistent, how it relates to the episode, and what consequences follow.
4. Does the pattern recur over time?
A single occasion of overeating does not establish BED. In the DSM-5 diagnostic framework, BED includes binge episodes occurring on average at least once a week for three months, together with other required features (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality diagnostic criteria table). People who have significant problems below this frequency still deserve support. The diagnostic threshold is a classification rule, not a reason to postpone care.
5. Are there restrictive or compensatory behaviors?
A clinician asks about prolonged fasting, vomiting, misuse of medications, excessive exercise, and restrictive eating patterns. Regular inappropriate compensatory behaviors may indicate bulimia nervosa instead of BED. Restriction or purging can also introduce nutritional, cardiovascular, and electrolyte risks that require medical assessment, even when a person's appearance seems unremarkable (NIMH, Eating Disorders).
Four Examples That Illustrate the Difference
At a family celebration, someone eats a larger dinner than usual, enjoys dessert, feels very full, and continues their evening without significant distress. This is an example of situational overeating. The meal's size does not imply a psychiatric condition.
A person who has missed several meals because of an unusually busy day arrives home intensely hungry and eats much more than planned. That experience may reflect normal hunger after inadequate intake. Persistent restrictive patterns and distress would still justify further assessment, but this single episode cannot establish binge eating or BED.
Another person eats an objectively unusually large amount within a limited period and feels unable to stop even while wanting to. They experience intense distress, and similar episodes recur. This description warrants a conversation with an eating-disorder specialist, who can assess the full diagnostic criteria and rule out other explanations. A hypothetical example remains distinct from a clinical diagnosis.
A teenager reports feeling profoundly out of control while eating an amount that adults might not consider unusually large. This can be a subjective binge episode. Pediatric research has shown that loss of control is linked with emotional and eating-related concerns even when episode size differs (Tanofsky-Kraff and colleagues). Developmental needs, context, and distress should be assessed rather than dismissed.
What Counts as a Binge-Eating Episode?
A clinical binge episode is a distinct symptom characterized by objectively unusually large intake in a discrete time period together with loss of control. The period is commonly illustrated by an interval such as two hours, although a professional evaluates the context rather than conducting a simplistic clock or calorie test. The diagnostic definition concerns both the behavior and the experienced inability to control it (NIDDK).
People sometimes use the everyday word “binge” to refer to having an extra snack or enjoying more dessert than planned. That conversational usage is substantially broader than the clinical construct. Conversely, a person experiencing a subjective binge may feel distress despite having eaten an amount that does not satisfy the objective-size criterion. Subjective episodes are important assessment phenomena and should not automatically be classified as full BED episodes.
The challenge of defining an objectively large amount is especially apparent during growth and across cultural or social eating contexts. Studies use varying self-report instruments, interviews, and size judgments. A systematic review of binge eating and loss of control in children and adolescents illustrates these measurement differences. The strongest interpretation integrates what was eaten with perceived control, developmental context, and functional impact.
When Does Binge Eating Become Binge-Eating Disorder?
BED is a formal eating-disorder diagnosis. Under the DSM-5 framework, the required elements include recurrent episodes with objectively unusually large intake and loss of control; at least three specified associated characteristics; marked distress about the binge eating; an average frequency of at least once a week for three months; and absence of regular inappropriate compensatory behaviors. The binge eating must also not occur exclusively in the course of anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. These criteria are summarized in the AHRQ diagnostic table.
The five associated characteristics are eating more rapidly than usual, eating until uncomfortably full, eating large amounts without physical hunger, eating alone because of embarrassment, and feeling disgusted, depressed, or very guilty afterward. At least three are required in the framework, but each can occur without BED. A diagnosis therefore depends on the entire pattern, including the meaning and course of symptoms.
The time and frequency criteria support consistency in research and practice. They do not imply that a person must experience three months of severe distress before asking for help. Subthreshold presentations can still involve significant impairment. A clinician may consider another specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED), unspecified feeding or eating disorder (UFED), or eating-related distress without a current formal diagnosis.
Weight and BMI are neither required indicators nor adequate measures of BED. The disorder is defined through psychological and behavioral symptoms, not a particular body shape. The APA practice guideline recommends assessing eating patterns, psychiatric symptoms, medical history, physical health, and relevant comorbidities. Clinicians distinguish a diagnostic label from the severity of distress and from specific medical complications.
Emotional Eating, Stress Eating, and Overeating
Emotional eating refers to eating influenced by feelings. Stress, sadness, boredom, joy, comfort, or celebration may affect when and how someone eats. Emotional eating is not a standalone psychiatric diagnosis and does not necessarily involve loss of control. A binge episode may have an emotional antecedent, but no single trigger defines binge eating.
Eating without physical hunger likewise occurs in ordinary life. People eat socially, follow work schedules, share meals, and enjoy food for reasons beyond immediate hunger. Eating past comfortable fullness can happen in ordinary overeating as well as binge episodes. Clinically, the questions remain whether control was lost, whether distress is marked, whether the pattern is recurring, and whether other relevant behaviors are present.
Repeated restrictive dieting or skipped meals can precede binge episodes for some individuals. Such patterns may heighten hunger and food-related preoccupation. This is a possible maintaining process, not a universal explanation or proof that every diet causes BED. NICE guideline NG69 warns against weight-loss dieting during BED-focused cognitive behavioral therapy because it may trigger further binge eating.
Why Loss-of-Control Eating Can Become Recurrent
Evidence points to interacting genetic, psychological, social, and developmental influences. Distressing emotions, restrictive food rules, vulnerability to eating-disorder symptoms, stressful experiences, and co-occurring psychiatric problems may each be relevant in some people. These factors are not individually diagnostic. The NIDDK review of symptoms and causes describes BED as arising from multiple interacting influences.
In some patterns, restriction is followed by pronounced hunger or strong urges to eat; an episode of loss of control is then followed by shame or renewed attempts at restriction. The sequence can repeat, especially when ordinary fluctuations in eating are interpreted as moral failures. A clinician can explore whether such a process fits an individual's history without imposing it on everyone.
Avoidance and secrecy can complicate care. Someone may be reluctant to discuss episodes because they fear judgment about body size, eating habits, or self-control. This can delay recognition and reduce support. Respectful assessment focuses on experiences, distress, and functioning rather than moral categories about food or appearance.
Research also examines reward processing, decision-making, and emotion regulation. Findings differ across populations, measures, and study designs; they have not produced a single clinical brain test that identifies BED. Current diagnosis relies on established symptom criteria and qualified clinical evaluation, with attention to medical context and other diagnoses.
How Professionals Evaluate the Difference
A clinician usually begins by asking what happens before, during, and after episodes. They explore perceived loss of control, episode circumstances, the amount eaten, frequency and duration, associated feelings, and effects on daily life. They also ask about restricting food, purging, compulsive exercise, medications, sleep, substance use, anxiety, depression, and relevant health conditions.
The physical evaluation depends on actual symptoms and risks. A professional may review vital signs, growth and development, nutrition, hydration, weight trajectory, and laboratory tests when clinically appropriate. Medical instability can occur at different body sizes, especially when restriction or purging accompanies eating-related distress. Guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics and Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine emphasize developmentally sensitive assessment and medical safety.
Structured clinical interviews and standardized measures may help quantify binge frequency and evaluate diagnostic criteria. Screening questionnaires have a different purpose: they identify people who could benefit from more evaluation. A positive screening result is not a diagnosis, and a negative result does not automatically rule out difficulties. The BEDS-7 development study demonstrates the role of a brief instrument as a referral or further-assessment tool.
A clinician also evaluates whether an apparently large meal followed unusual hunger or deprivation, whether medications or illness changed appetite, and whether the problem is primarily one of distressing thoughts about food rather than objective binge episodes. These distinctions guide appropriate care while avoiding premature labels.
Conditions That Can Be Confused With BED
Bulimia nervosa involves recurrent binge episodes and recurrent compensatory behaviors, such as purging or severe efforts to offset eating. The absence of regular inappropriate compensation is part of the BED definition. Compensatory behaviors can cause medically important dehydration or electrolyte disturbances. Their presence deserves direct clinical discussion rather than assuming a BED diagnosis (NIMH).
Anorexia nervosa involves restrictive eating, significantly low body weight in the individual's clinical context, and characteristic weight- or shape-related fears and behaviors. Some presentations involve binge-eating/purging episodes. Atypical anorexia nervosa is generally classified under OSFED and may involve serious restriction and medical compromise despite not meeting the low-weight criterion. Weight history and medical status are crucial (SAHM).
Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) involves restricted intake associated with sensory sensitivities, limited interest in food, or fear of adverse consequences, without the characteristic weight- or shape-driven concerns of anorexia. Pica involves eating nonfood substances; rumination disorder involves recurrent regurgitation. These conditions have different diagnostic assessments.
OSFED and UFED allow recognition of clinically significant feeding or eating difficulties that do not fit another full syndrome or for which adequate diagnostic information is unavailable. Orthorexia is a proposed construct involving problematic preoccupation with perceived healthy or pure eating; it is not an independent DSM-5-TR diagnosis. Medical causes of changes in hunger, appetite, or satiety may also require investigation.
Can Binge-Eating Disorder Occur at Any Body Weight?
Yes. Binge-eating disorder can occur at a wide range of body sizes. Weight or BMI cannot establish whether a person experiences loss of control, has recurrent binge episodes, or feels marked distress. People who do not match popular stereotypes may still have significant symptoms and deserve assessment. The diagnostic criteria concern the eating pattern and associated experience.
Medical care remains relevant independently of diagnosis. Clinicians evaluate any nutritional difficulties, physical illnesses, metabolic concerns, rapid changes in weight or intake, or consequences of purging and restriction according to the person's situation. A person can be medically unstable even when their appearance does not suggest a problem. Pediatric guidance emphasizes growth history and physiological health rather than isolated adult BMI cutoffs (AAP; SAHM).
Children, Teenagers, and Developmental Context
Children and teenagers have changing nutritional needs. Growth spurts, activity, puberty, and recovery from illness can influence appetite and meal size. Adults should be careful about equating large portions with binge eating. The experience of control, persistence of distress, eating rules, and consequences for the young person's life offer more meaningful clues.
Pediatric research suggests that loss-of-control eating is associated with meaningful eating-related and emotional concerns, even when the amount is not objectively large. A study published in 2010 examined the clinical significance of perceived loss of control. A 2021 systematic review documented methodological variation and a still-developing evidence base in younger populations.
An appropriate assessment considers growth trajectories, medical history, emotional functioning, family environment, school experience, and other possible disorders. Families can support young people through open conversations, avoiding criticism of appetite or body shape, and seeking pediatric or adolescent-specialist advice when distressing patterns persist. The goal is to support health and development rather than police meals.
Treatment: What the Evidence Supports
People diagnosed with BED have evidence-based treatment options. The 2023 American Psychiatric Association guideline recommends eating-disorder-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), in individual or group formats, for patients with BED. These therapies address binge frequency, maintaining processes, emotional distress, and daily functioning. They are structured treatments with established aims rather than generic instructions about self-control.
For adults, the NICE NG69 recommendations begin with BED-focused guided self-help and offer eating-disorder-focused CBT when guided self-help is unsuitable, declined, or insufficient. CBT may address regular eating, problematic food-related beliefs, coping skills, and relapse prevention. NICE cautions that weight-loss dieting during BED treatment can provoke binge episodes; treatment for eating-disorder symptoms has its own therapeutic goals.
A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of CBT for BED and bulimia nervosa pooled evidence from randomized trials and found advantages over certain control conditions for outcomes including binge remission and episode frequency. The studies involved different comparison conditions and participant groups. Their results support CBT as an established treatment approach but do not predict identical outcomes for every patient.
Medication can be considered in selected situations. In the United States, lisdexamfetamine is FDA-approved for moderate to severe BED in adults. The FDA information describes this indication. Prescription suitability depends on medical history, risks, and clinical assessment. Approval for adult BED does not make a medication appropriate for occasional overeating, other eating disorders, or younger populations without the relevant evidence and authorization.
Treatment may also address co-occurring anxiety, depression, trauma-related symptoms, and medical complications. Coordinated care can involve mental health clinicians, primary care providers, and registered dietitians with eating-disorder expertise. Recovery can include fewer episodes, reduced secrecy and distress, improved ability to eat flexibly, better relationships, and restored everyday functioning. Individual relapse prevention plans help people respond to setbacks without escalating restrictive or compensatory behaviors.
What to Do If You Recognize a Pattern
If you occasionally eat more than intended and experience little ongoing distress, consider the circumstances before labeling it as a clinical problem. Unusual hunger, disrupted meals, celebration, fatigue, and changes in routine are relevant. A large meal need not be treated as a moral failure or followed by punishment.
When loss-of-control experiences recur or interfere with daily life, speak with a health professional experienced in eating disorders. Describe what eating feels like and how frequently the pattern occurs. Include distress, restriction, purging, medication use, and medical symptoms when relevant. You do not need to identify your diagnosis, count calories, or wait until symptoms become severe to ask for help.
Harsh compensatory restriction or excessive exercise after an upsetting episode can perpetuate difficulties for some people. Qualified care can help establish adequate, consistent nourishment and address psychological and medical needs. The NICE guideline supports structured treatment aimed at binge symptoms rather than self-directed punishment.
If a friend or relative is struggling, ask about their experience without judging portions or appearance. Offer assistance finding appropriate clinical support. The person's experience of losing control, their distress, and any associated medical problems are more important than outsiders' assumptions about what or how much they should eat.
When Medical Evaluation Is Urgent
Chest pain, fainting, an irregular heartbeat, marked confusion, severe weakness, persistent vomiting, and symptoms of significant dehydration require urgent medical attention. Purging, severe restriction, and nutritional instability can create electrolyte and cardiovascular complications. Body size alone does not indicate safety. The NIMH overview and adolescent medicine position paper support medical assessment when warning signs occur.
Recurrent eating-related distress also warrants help before a crisis. A person does not need to meet every diagnostic threshold before consulting a professional. If there is immediate danger, contact local emergency services; otherwise, a primary care professional or eating-disorder specialist can help determine the appropriate level of care.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is overeating once the same as binge eating?
No. A single large meal may be ordinary overeating. A clinical binge-eating episode combines an objectively unusually large amount during a limited interval with perceived loss of control. Context and personal experience matter more than the meal's appearance.
Can binge eating happen without binge-eating disorder?
Yes. A binge episode is a symptom. BED is a diagnosis requiring recurrence, distress, associated characteristics, and exclusions. Someone with subthreshold problems can still benefit from support.
Can you lose control of eating without consuming a huge amount?
Yes. Researchers call this subjective binge eating or loss-of-control eating. It can be distressing even when the amount is not objectively large. It is not automatically a full BED episode (Goldschmidt).
Does guilt after eating mean I binged?
No. Guilt can arise after ordinary eating or from restrictive beliefs and social stigma. It is only one possible associated experience. Diagnosis depends on the full behavioral and psychological pattern.
Is eating quickly a sign of BED?
Rapid eating is one associated characteristic considered in the criteria, but many people eat quickly for other reasons. Speed alone cannot establish a binge or an eating disorder.
Can someone with BED have an average or low BMI?
Yes. BED diagnosis does not depend on a particular BMI. Medical risk and psychological symptoms are assessed independently, including when people have experienced significant restrictive eating.
What if episodes occur less than weekly?
Symptoms below the formal BED frequency threshold may still be significant. A professional may consider another specified presentation or support without assigning a full BED diagnosis. There is no need to wait for episodes to increase.
Is emotional eating the same as binge eating?
Emotional eating describes the context or motivation for eating. Binge eating describes the behavior together with loss of control. The two can overlap, but neither automatically implies the other.
Can skipping meals contribute to episodes?
For some people, restricted or irregular intake contributes to pronounced hunger and later loss-of-control episodes. Other mechanisms are also involved. An individualized clinical evaluation is more useful than assuming a single explanation.
Does a screening quiz diagnose BED?
No. Screening instruments indicate who may benefit from further evaluation. A clinician assesses the full criteria, context, physical health, and alternative diagnoses (BEDS-7 study).
What therapies have the strongest evidence?
Eating-disorder-focused CBT and IPT have guideline support for BED. Guided self-help is recommended as an initial option for many adults by NICE. Medication can be considered for selected adults after clinical evaluation (APA; NICE).
How do I know when to seek help?
Seek assessment when episodes of loss of control recur, create marked distress, interfere with daily life, or accompany restriction or purging. A person may need care before meeting every formal criterion.
The Bottom Line
Overeating is a descriptive term for eating more than intended or comfortable. A clinical binge episode involves an objectively unusually large amount plus loss of control; subjective loss-of-control episodes may also be clinically meaningful. BED adds specific requirements concerning recurrence, distress, associated features, and exclusions. The central distinctions concern experience, context, and functioning rather than body weight or an isolated meal. Recurrent distress deserves individualized, evidence-based assessment.
Related Articles
Binge Eating Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment — Clinical definition, diagnostic criteria, and evidence-based treatment for recurrent binge-eating disorder.
Social Media and Body Image: Appearance Comparison, Ideals, and Mental Health — How online appearance pressures can affect self-evaluation without determining an eating-disorder diagnosis.
Social Comparison on Social Media: Mental Health, Body Image, and Self-Evaluation — Related research on social comparison and body-image concerns, a separate canonical topic.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2021). Identification and management of eating disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 147(1), e2020040279. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-040279
American Psychiatric Association. (2023). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.23180001
Goldschmidt, A. B. (2017). Are loss of control while eating and overeating valid constructs? A critical review of the literature. Obesity Reviews, 18(4), 412–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12491
Herman, B. K., et al. (2016). Development of the 7-item binge-eating disorder screener (BEDS-7). Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.15m01896
Moustafa, A. F., Quigley, K. M., Wadden, T. A., Berkowitz, R. I., & Chao, A. M. (2021). A systematic review of binge eating, loss of control eating, and weight loss in children and adolescents. Obesity, 29(8), 1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23185
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. (2021). Binge eating disorder: Definition, facts, symptoms, and causes. https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/weight-management/binge-eating-disorder
National Institute of Mental Health. Eating disorders: What you need to know. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/eating-disorders
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017, updated). Eating disorders: Recognition and treatment (NG69). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng69/chapter/recommendations
Sioziou, A. L., et al. (2026). Cognitive behavioural therapy compared to control conditions in treating bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.70070
Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2022). Medical management of restrictive eating disorders in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.006
Tanofsky-Kraff, M., et al. (2010). Salience of loss of control for pediatric binge episodes: Does size really matter? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19827022/
U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2015). Management and outcomes of binge-eating disorder: Summary of diagnostic criteria. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338301/table/introduction.t1/
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves multiple generics of ADHD and BED treatment. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/fda-approves-multiple-generics-adhd-and-bed-treatment