Tea Break Psychology: Attention, Recovery, Routine, and Social Connection
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Tea break psychology is best understood as the psychology of a pause that happens to be organized around tea. A tea break can interrupt sustained task demands, create a predictable transition, provide a sensory routine, deliver caffeine when the tea is caffeinated, and open a low-pressure space for conversation. Those mechanisms can occur together, but they are not the same mechanism.
When the break takes place in a dedicated tea venue, the room itself adds another layer: atmosphere, social presence, service rhythm, and permission to stay. See Tea House Psychology: Atmosphere, Social Presence, Ritual, and Why People Linger.
The strongest evidence is about breaks themselves. A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental and quasi-experimental microbreak studies found that short breaks increased vigor and reduced fatigue, while the average effect on overall performance was small and not statistically significant. Performance benefits were clearer for less cognitively demanding tasks, and longer breaks tended to produce larger performance gains. Albulescu et al., 2022. A broader systematic review of 83 studies likewise concluded that the effects of work breaks depend on duration, frequency, activity, who initiates the break, and what people actually experience during it. Lyubykh et al., 2022.
Tea adds another layer. Brewed black tea has randomized placebo-controlled evidence for selected attention outcomes and self-reported alertness, while newer synthesis work stresses that findings from isolated caffeine, L-theanine, extracts, or laboratory preparations should not be treated as proof of what every ordinary cup of tea will do. De Bruin et al., 2011; Payne et al., 2025. The most defensible conclusion is therefore simple: a tea break may be restorative because it is a break, structured because it is a routine, socially meaningful when shared, and alerting when the beverage contains enough caffeine for that person and situation.
What Is Tea Break Psychology?
Tea break psychology examines how attention, fatigue, recovery, habit, expectation, sensory experience, and social interaction shape the experience of stopping for tea. It sits inside the broader psychology of tea, but it owns a narrower question: what changes when tea becomes a boundary between periods of work, study, caregiving, or other sustained activity?
The phrase can describe a formal workplace break, a five-minute pause at home, a shared kitchen ritual with colleagues, an afternoon cup between tasks, or a remote-work break taken away from a screen. The common feature is not a particular tea or a fixed number of minutes. It is the temporary suspension or reduction of the demand that came before.
This distinction matters because many popular explanations attribute every benefit to the drink. In reality, the break may be doing much of the recovery work, movement may contribute, conversation may contribute, and caffeine may contribute. A cup consumed while answering email at the same speed is psychologically different from a cup that marks an actual interruption of work demands.
A Tea Break Has Five Psychological Layers
A useful way to understand a tea break is to separate five layers that are often blended together in everyday language.
1. The break layer
Stopping or reducing work demands can allow short-term recovery. The best synthesis evidence supports modest improvements in vigor and fatigue from microbreaks, with more variable effects on performance. Albulescu et al., 2022.
2. The context-change layer
Standing up, walking to a kitchen, changing rooms, looking away from a screen, or switching from abstract work to a simple physical sequence changes the immediate task environment. The benefit cannot automatically be assigned to tea because movement, posture change, sensory variation, and psychological detachment may all contribute.
3. The routine and ritual layer
Boiling water, choosing a cup, steeping, waiting, pouring, and returning can become a stable sequence. Repetition in recurring contexts is central to habit formation, and context stability can increase automaticity. Wood & Rünger, 2016; Stojanovic et al., 2022. Our dedicated pages on tea ritual psychology and tea habit examine those mechanisms in more depth.
4. The beverage layer
Tea contributes temperature, aroma, taste, hydration, and, for true tea from Camellia sinensis, usually caffeine. Caffeine can alter alertness and attention, but the amount varies by tea type, leaf dose, brewing, serving size, and individual sensitivity. The evidence for isolated caffeine or L-theanine is not interchangeable with evidence for brewed tea. Payne et al., 2025.
5. The social layer
A shared break can create informal interaction that is easier than a scheduled meeting because it has a built-in activity and a natural ending. Research on workplace microbreaks and informal face-to-face interaction suggests that socialization can be associated with positive affect and, in some settings, better subsequent functioning. Kim et al., 2018; Watanabe et al., 2016. That evidence concerns social breaks broadly, not a universal tea-specific social effect.
Do Tea Breaks Restore Attention?
They can, but “restore attention” should not be treated as a single proven tea effect. Attention after a tea break may change because the person stopped the task, reduced fatigue, moved to a different environment, returned with a clearer task boundary, consumed caffeine, or some combination of these factors.
The microbreak meta-analysis found reliable effects on vigor and fatigue, but the pooled effect on overall performance did not reach statistical significance. That is important because feeling fresher and performing better are related but distinct outcomes. Albulescu et al., 2022. The broader work-break review similarly emphasizes boundary conditions rather than a universal productivity effect. Lyubykh et al., 2022.
A break after repetitive or moderately demanding work may therefore improve the conditions under which attention is used without guaranteeing that every cognitive score will rise. After highly demanding work, a very short pause may be insufficient. The research base does not support a universal claim that five, ten, or twelve minutes is the scientifically optimal tea-break duration.
If the tea itself is caffeinated, the beverage may add an alerting effect. Two randomized crossover studies using brewed black tea found improved accuracy on an attention-switching task and greater self-reported alertness compared with a placebo beverage. De Bruin et al., 2011. Those findings are useful evidence for brewed tea, but they do not show that every tea break improves attention, and the studies were industry-sponsored. Our tea and focus article separates tea-beverage evidence from evidence on caffeine and L-theanine.
Recovery: What a Break Can Do That a Drink Alone Cannot
Recovery during the workday is not simply the opposite of working. It is a temporary change in demands and experience that may reduce accumulated strain, create psychological distance from the task, or restore energy before the next period of effort.
Experimental work on microbreaks shows that some combinations of duration and activity help people recover toward pre-task levels of energy and attention, while other combinations do less. Bennett et al., 2020. Lunch-break interventions also suggest that detachment and enjoyment can mediate improvements in end-of-day concentration, strain, and fatigue. Sianoja et al., 2018.
This helps explain why the same cup can function differently on different days. A cup made while continuing to monitor messages may preserve the work demand. A cup prepared away from the desk may create a clearer interruption. A shared cup may replace cognitive demand with social interaction, which can be restorative for one person and effortful for another.
A tea break is therefore better understood as a configurable recovery episode than as a standardized intervention. Duration matters, activity matters, social context matters, and the work that came before matters.
Why the Preparation Sequence Can Matter
Tea preparation gives a break a beginning, middle, and end. That structure can be psychologically useful even when the drink is caffeine-free. The kettle starts the sequence; steeping creates a waiting period; pouring marks completion; returning to the desk closes the break.
Habit research shows that repeated behaviors become more automatic when they are repeatedly performed in stable contexts. Wood & Rünger, 2016. Experimental and observational work on context stability also finds that stable contexts can strengthen automaticity. Stojanovic et al., 2022. A regularly timed tea break can therefore become a learned transition cue without requiring a mystical explanation.
The tea-specific claim should remain proportionate to the evidence. There is good general evidence for habits and routines; there is not strong evidence that the sound of a kettle, the shape of a mug, or a particular steeping sequence universally produces psychological recovery. Those objects can become personally meaningful cues through repetition, familiarity, and learned association.
For many people the sequence also contributes comfort because it is familiar and predictable. That experiential layer is covered separately in Tea and Comfort: Warmth, Familiarity, Safety Cues, and Emotional Regulation.
Tea Breaks as Time Anchors
A recurring tea break can divide an otherwise continuous day into episodes. Morning work happens before the break; the next block begins after it. In remote work, where commuting and office transitions may be absent, a recurring pause can create a behavioral boundary that would otherwise have to be invented.
Calling the break a time anchor does not mean the brain requires a particular tea schedule. It means a recurring event can become a predictable temporal cue. The psychological value comes from repetition and boundary-making, while the exact time should fit the person's tasks, caffeine sensitivity, and schedule.
This is also why a tea break can feel unusually important when it is skipped. The missing cup may include several missing components at once: the beverage, the expected sensory reward, a habit cue, a physical pause, a conversation, and the anticipated transition between work blocks.
Social Connection: Why Shared Tea Breaks Can Feel Different
A shared tea break has a simple social script: someone gets up, asks who wants tea, people gather or overlap for a few minutes, conversation starts without requiring a formal agenda, and the break ends when the drinks are made or finished. The beverage supplies an activity around which interaction can occur.
The evidence base is stronger for social interaction during breaks than for tea as the causal agent. In a daily study of call-center employees, relaxation, socialization, and cognitive microbreaks were associated with increased positive affect, which in turn predicted greater sales performance for some workers; nutrition-intake breaks alone did not show the same pattern. Kim et al., 2018.
A qualitative study of primary health-care staff identified companionship, along with variation and manageability, as one of the themes participants considered important for recovery during working hours. Ejlertsson et al., 2018. An experimental break study also found that informal face-to-face interaction improved mood relative to spending the break alone in that sample. Watanabe et al., 2016.
These findings support the plausibility of the tea break as a social container. They do not show that everyone should socialize on every break. Conversation can be supportive, distracting, obligatory, conflictual, or exhausting. The restorative value of a social break depends on relationship quality, autonomy, timing, and individual need.
For a tea break specifically, the strongest conclusion is that the drink can provide a familiar, low-pressure structure for interaction, while the restorative value of the shared pause still depends on relationship quality, autonomy, timing, and context.
Is a Solo Tea Break Less Useful?
No. Social connection is one possible function of a tea break, not a requirement. A solo break can reduce incoming demands, provide quiet, change sensory input, and create psychological distance from the task. For someone who has spent the previous hour in meetings, quiet may be more restorative than additional conversation.
The key question is what the person is recovering from. If the dominant demand was isolation, a shared break may provide affiliation. If the dominant demand was social interaction, a solitary break may provide relief. Break science supports attention to activity and experience rather than treating one break format as universally superior.
This is one reason prescriptive workplace rules such as “everyone should take tea together” can miss the mechanism. Autonomy over the break may be part of what makes it restorative.
Tea Break vs Smartphone Break
A break can stop one task while immediately replacing it with another stream of input. That is why “not working” is not always equivalent to recovery.
In an experience-sampling study of 83 PhD candidates with objectively logged phone use, people were more likely to use their smartphones when they felt fatigued or bored, but they reported greater fatigue and boredom after more smartphone use rather than less. Dora et al., 2021. This was an observational study in a specific population, so it does not prove that every phone break causes fatigue. It does challenge the assumption that checking a phone is automatically restorative.
A tea break can be designed to reduce input simply by leaving the phone behind for a few minutes. That is a practical interpretation of the evidence, not a claim that tea has a unique anti-screen property. The useful contrast is between a break that actually changes the demand profile and a break that preserves rapid information switching.
Does the Tea Itself Improve Focus?
Sometimes, but the beverage effect must be separated from the break effect.
Brewed black tea has direct randomized evidence for selected attention outcomes and alertness. De Bruin et al., 2011. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials examined tea, L-theanine alone, and L-theanine plus caffeine. It found small-to-moderate differences favoring theanine plus caffeine for some cognition and mood outcomes, while confidence intervals often reflected substantial uncertainty. The authors explicitly called for more research using tea beverages or tea-equivalent doses in free-living participants. Payne et al., 2025.
An earlier systematic review and meta-analysis found moderate acute effects of combined caffeine and L-theanine on alertness and attentional switching in the first two hours after dosing. Camfield et al., 2014. Most of that literature used isolated compounds, so it cannot be converted into a promise about a normal cup.
The practical implication is that the psychological value of a tea break does not depend on caffeine. A caffeine-free herbal infusion can still organize a pause, provide warmth and aroma, and support a routine. What it does not provide is the same stimulant exposure as caffeinated Camellia sinensis tea.
Caffeine Can Help Alertness and Still Be the Wrong Choice for a Break
For most adults, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration cites 400 mg of caffeine per day as an amount not generally associated with negative effects, while emphasizing wide individual variation in sensitivity and metabolism. The FDA lists typical caffeine amounts of about 37 mg in 12 fluid ounces of green tea and 71 mg in 12 fluid ounces of black tea, while noting substantial product variation. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2024.
Timing matters because caffeine can impair subsequent sleep. A systematic review and meta-analysis found that caffeine reduced total sleep time and sleep efficiency and increased sleep-onset latency, with effects depending on dose and timing. Gardiner et al., 2023. A late-afternoon tea break may therefore support short-term alertness while working against nighttime sleep for a caffeine-sensitive person.
Caffeine can also produce jitteriness or anxiety-like symptoms in susceptible people, especially at higher doses. A tea break is not a treatment for an anxiety disorder. Readers who want the evidence separated by tea type, caffeine, L-theanine, and herbal infusions can use our tea for anxiety guide, while the sleep-specific timing evidence is covered in tea and sleep.
Tea Break vs Coffee Break
The psychology of tea breaks and coffee breaks overlaps substantially. Both can interrupt work, create recurring routines, support informal conversation, and pair a sensory beverage with a transition in the day. The broad coffee mechanisms are covered in The Psychology of Coffee: Mood, Attention, Habit, Ritual, Taste, and Social Life.
The beverages differ in typical caffeine exposure, flavor, preparation, serving patterns, and learned cultural associations. Those differences can change the experience, but they do not justify a universal claim that tea is psychologically calmer or coffee is psychologically more productive.
A person may also learn different scripts around the two drinks. Coffee may mean “start work” while tea means “pause,” or the reverse. That learned meaning is personal and contextual. The more useful question is what the break actually contains: interruption of demands, movement, sensory change, stimulant dose, routine, and social interaction.
How Long Should a Tea Break Be?
There is no scientifically established optimal tea-break duration.
Microbreak studies often define short breaks as less than ten minutes, and the 2022 meta-analysis found that longer breaks were associated with larger performance benefits. It also suggested that recovery from highly depleting tasks may require more than ten minutes. Albulescu et al., 2022. A separate mixed-methods experiment showed that microbreak duration and activity interact with recovery rather than producing a single universal number. Bennett et al., 2020.
Popular “five-minute,” “ten-minute,” or “twelve-minute” tea-break protocols can be useful behavioral formats, but the exact number should not be presented as a validated psychological dose. A practical break needs enough time to interrupt the previous demand and should fit the intensity of the work, the person's schedule, and what happens during the break.
For a quick desk-work transition, several minutes may be enough to stand, make tea, look away from the screen, and return with a next action in mind. After sustained complex work, emotional labor, or a long meeting block, a longer period may be more appropriate.
When Is the Best Time to Take a Tea Break?
Break timing works best when it responds to task structure and accumulating fatigue rather than a universal clock time.
Useful moments include the end of a demanding work block, a transition between different kinds of tasks, the point at which attention has become repeatedly unstable, or a predictable mid-morning or afternoon interval that prevents continuous work from expanding indefinitely. A scheduled break can also be easier to protect than a break taken only after exhaustion is already high.
Caffeine changes the timing decision. An afternoon tea break with black, green, oolong, white, or matcha may contain enough caffeine to matter for sleep in a sensitive person. A caffeine-free infusion can preserve the pause and routine without the same stimulant layer.
How to Design a Tea Break for Attention and Recovery
The evidence supports designing the break around mechanisms rather than turning it into a rigid wellness ritual.
Make the break an actual change in demand
Stop the main task. If possible, leave the immediate work position, even briefly. A cup prepared while continuing the same email thread may deliver tea without delivering much psychological distance.
Use a simple preparation sequence
A familiar tea, mug, kettle, and brewing method reduce decision load. Repetition can make the transition easier to initiate. Variety can be enjoyable, but a work break does not need to become a tasting project.
Choose social or solo deliberately
If you want connection, invite someone or use a shared kitchen moment. If you need quiet, protect the break from conversation. Recovery depends on the demand you are trying to interrupt.
Keep the phone optional rather than automatic
A phone can be useful, but evidence from real-world workdays suggests that smartphone use does not necessarily reduce fatigue or boredom and may coincide with worse subjective states afterward. Dora et al., 2021. Leaving it behind is a reasonable experiment when the goal is reduced input.
Match the beverage to the rest of the day
Choose caffeinated tea when alertness is useful and the timing fits your sleep and sensitivity. Choose decaf tea or a caffeine-free infusion when stimulant effects would conflict with the purpose of the break.
Make returning easy
Before leaving the task, note the next concrete action or leave the work at a natural boundary. That reduces the cost of resuming. This is a practical workflow strategy rather than a tea-specific psychological effect.
Tea Breaks in Remote and Hybrid Work
Remote work removes many incidental transitions: the walk to another room, informal encounters, commuting, and visible group rhythms. A tea break can reintroduce one small boundary into an otherwise continuous screen day.
Observational research during home working has linked failure to take rest breaks with greater psychological and physical fatigue and sleep problems, although such findings cannot establish simple causation. More controlled work shows that short remotely delivered activity or relaxation breaks can improve some mood and attention outcomes. Lyubykh et al., 2022 provides the broader synthesis of break features and outcomes.
A virtual tea break can also create social contact, but turning every break into another video call may defeat the recovery goal for someone who already spends the day in meetings. Hybrid workers benefit from treating affiliation and detachment as separate needs rather than assuming one format serves both.
When a Tea Break Can Backfire
A tea break is not automatically restorative. It can become another source of interruption, stimulation, social demand, or sleep disruption.
Unplanned breaks can fragment deep work when they occur at the wrong moment. Social breaks can feel obligatory. A crowded break room can add noise instead of relief. A phone-filled break can preserve rapid information switching. Strong caffeinated tea can create jitteriness in a sensitive person or interfere with sleep when taken late.
The direct tea-break evidence is also limited. In a small crossover study of 19 healthy desk workers, hourly breaks combining a short walk with a cup of tea did not prevent the decline in positive affect associated with six hours of desk work, although the intervention improved a measure of cerebral autoregulation. Speretta et al., 2021. Because the intervention combined walking and tea and used a small sample, it cannot isolate a tea-specific psychological benefit.
That study is useful precisely because it prevents overclaiming. Tea breaks are plausible and practical recovery structures, but the scientific literature does not justify presenting them as a guaranteed mood reset, productivity hack, or treatment.
What the Evidence Supports — and What Remains Uncertain
Established or reasonably well-supported
Short work breaks can improve vigor and reduce fatigue on average, although performance effects are more variable. Albulescu et al., 2022. Work-break outcomes depend on duration, frequency, activity, initiation, and subjective experience. Lyubykh et al., 2022. Repetition in stable contexts supports habit formation. Wood & Rünger, 2016. Caffeine can affect alertness and can also interfere with sleep depending on dose, timing, and sensitivity. Gardiner et al., 2023.
Supported, but context-dependent
Social microbreaks can be associated with positive affect, and informal face-to-face interaction can improve mood in some settings. Kim et al., 2018; Watanabe et al., 2016. Brewed black tea has direct evidence for selected attention outcomes. De Bruin et al., 2011.
Plausible interpretation
The kettle, mug, steeping sequence, and familiar time of day can become learned transition cues. The scientific foundation comes from general habit and context-learning research; direct studies isolating those specific tea-break cues are limited.
Limited or unsupported as universal claims
There is no established optimal tea-break length, no evidence that tea breaks universally increase productivity, no basis for claiming that a shared break is always better than a solo break, and no evidence that tea itself treats clinical anxiety, depression, burnout, insomnia, or another mental-health disorder.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are tea breaks good for productivity?
They can support the conditions for productive work by reducing fatigue and increasing vigor, but the average performance effect of microbreaks is smaller and less consistent than the well-being effect. Albulescu et al., 2022. Treat a tea break as a recovery tool rather than a guaranteed productivity booster.
Can a tea break improve focus?
Potentially. The break can reduce fatigue and interrupt sustained demand, while caffeinated tea may add alerting effects. Brewed black tea has randomized evidence for selected attention outcomes. De Bruin et al., 2011. The effect varies with task, break quality, caffeine dose, sleep, tolerance, and individual sensitivity.
How long should a tea break be?
There is no validated universal duration. Short microbreaks can improve vigor and fatigue, while more demanding tasks may require longer recovery. Use the work demand and your actual recovery as guides rather than treating five, ten, or twelve minutes as a scientific rule.
Is a tea break better than working through?
For sustained work, taking breaks can support well-being and fatigue management. Whether a particular break improves performance depends on the task and the break. Working through every pause can also remove opportunities for movement, psychological detachment, and social contact.
Is a social tea break better than drinking tea alone?
Neither is universally better. Social breaks can support affiliation and positive affect, while solo breaks can provide quiet and detachment. The better option depends on what kind of demand you are recovering from.
Does tea have to contain caffeine for the break to work?
No. The break, routine, sensory change, and social context can exist without caffeine. Caffeine adds a pharmacological layer; it is not the mechanism that makes a pause a break.
Which tea is best for a work break?
There is no psychologically best tea. Choose for taste, desired caffeine level, time of day, and brewing convenience. Black, green, oolong, white, and matcha contain caffeine in variable amounts; herbal infusions may be caffeine-free unless they include a caffeinated ingredient.
Can a tea break help with stress or anxiety?
A break can support ordinary recovery and a familiar routine can feel calming, but tea is not an established treatment for an anxiety disorder. Caffeine can worsen anxiety-like symptoms for some people. See our tea for anxiety evidence review for the clinical boundary.
Is checking my phone during a tea break bad?
Not automatically. But phone use may preserve rapid information input, and one real-world study found that greater smartphone use during work was followed by greater fatigue and boredom rather than less. Dora et al., 2021. If the goal is recovery from screen demand, a phone-free break is a reasonable option.
Are tea breaks useful when working from home?
They can be especially useful as explicit boundaries in a day with fewer natural transitions. A home tea break can separate work blocks, create a movement cue, and, when desired, become a social moment with another household member or a remote colleague.
Is a tea break a form of mindfulness?
Not by definition. A tea break can include mindful attention to preparation, aroma, warmth, or taste, but it can also be social, hurried, distracted, or purely habitual. Mindfulness is a mode of attention; a tea break is a behavioral episode.
Related Articles
References
Albulescu, P., Macsinga, I., Rusu, A., Sulea, C., Bodnaru, A., & Tulbure, B. T. (2022). “Give me a break!” A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of micro-breaks for increasing well-being and performance. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272460
Bennett, A. A., Gabriel, A. S., & Calderwood, C. (2020). Examining the interplay of micro-break durations and activities for employee recovery: A mixed-methods investigation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(2), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000168
Camfield, D. A., Stough, C., Farrimond, J., & Scholey, A. B. (2014). Acute effects of tea constituents L-theanine, caffeine, and epigallocatechin gallate on cognitive function and mood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition Reviews, 72(8), 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/nure.12120
De Bruin, E. A., Rowson, M. J., Van Buren, L., Rycroft, J. A., & Owen, G. N. (2011). Black tea improves attention and self-reported alertness. Appetite, 56(2), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.011
Dora, J., van Hooff, M., Geurts, S., Kompier, M., & Bijleveld, E. (2021). Fatigue, boredom and objectively measured smartphone use at work. Royal Society Open Science, 8(7), 201915. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201915
Ejlertsson, L., Heijbel, B., Troein, M., & Brorsson, A. (2018). Variation, companionship and manageability important for recovery during working hours: A qualitative focus group study. Work, 61(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182783
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine is Too Much? https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/spilling-beans-how-much-caffeine-too-much
Gardiner, C., Weakley, J., Burke, L. M., Roach, G. D., Sargent, C., Maniar, N., Townshend, A., & Halson, S. L. (2023). The effect of caffeine on subsequent sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 69, 101764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101764
Kim, S., Park, Y., & Headrick, L. (2018). Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 772–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000308
Lyubykh, Z., Gulseren, D., Premji, Z., Wingate, T. G., Deng, C., Bélanger, L. J., & Turner, N. (2022). Role of work breaks in well-being and performance: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(5), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000337
Payne, E. R., Aceves-Martins, M., Dubost, J., Greyling, A., & de Roos, B. (2025). Effects of Tea (Camellia sinensis) or its Bioactive Compounds L-Theanine or L-Theanine plus Caffeine on Cognition, Sleep, and Mood in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrition Reviews, 83(10), 1873–1891. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf054
Sianoja, M., Syrek, C. J., de Bloom, J., Korpela, K., & Kinnunen, U. (2018). Enhancing daily well-being at work through lunchtime park walks and relaxation exercises: Recovery experiences as mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000083
Speretta, G. F., Fornasiero, A., Johns, J. A., Hopkins, N., Thijssen, D. H., & Low, D. A. (2021). Effects of Breaking up Deskwork with Physical Activity Combined with Tea Consumption on Cerebrovascular Function, Mood, and Affect. International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences, 34(6), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.36660/ijcs.20200209
Stojanovic, M., Grund, A., & Fries, S. (2022). Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 883795. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.883795
Watanabe, J., Atsumori, H., & Kiguchi, M. (2016). Informal Face-to-Face Interaction Improves Mood State Reflected in Prefrontal Cortex Activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00194
Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016). Psychology of Habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417