Suicidal Thoughts in Teenagers: How Parents and Caregivers Can Respond

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 18, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Cluster Suicide Prevention, Self-Harm and Crisis Care · Written by Artificial Sapiens

What parents should do when a teenager talks about suicide

When a teenager says they want to die, wishes they could disappear, describes suicide, or reveals a recent suicide attempt, the caregiver's first responsibility is to establish immediate safety while creating a pathway to professional assessment. Stay with the young person when there may be immediate danger, speak calmly, ask directly about suicide, seek urgent medical or crisis assistance as indicated, and make potentially lethal items inaccessible. Listen to what the teenager is experiencing and arrange a timely evaluation even when the immediate crisis subsides. A compassionate conversation and a reliable clinical response belong together. The National Institute of Mental Health's five action steps support asking directly, being present, keeping the person safe, connecting them with help, and following up.

If the teen has attempted suicide, has an immediate intention to act, has a current plan and access to a potentially lethal means, or cannot remain safe with available supervision, call emergency services or go to an emergency department now. In the United States, call 911 for immediate medical danger. The U.S. 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline provides crisis support by call or text at 988; it also supports people concerned about a loved one. The Lifeline complements emergency services when urgent medical intervention is necessary. Outside the United States, use the relevant local emergency number and locally verified crisis services. A teenager who reports distress without an immediate threat still needs a responsive adult and prompt individualized professional assessment.

Understanding what suicidal thoughts mean in adolescence

Suicidal ideation refers to thoughts about death by suicide, with considerable variation in frequency, vividness, duration, intensity, and relationship to intention. Passive suicidal ideation commonly refers to wishing to be dead or not to wake up. Active suicidal ideation involves thoughts of taking one's own life. Suicidal intent is a person's desire or expectation to act on these thoughts; a suicide attempt is self-directed behavior undertaken with at least some intent to die. Clinicians assess ideas, intent, preparation, behavior, access to means, and contextual changes as separate but interconnected dimensions. A teen may describe shifting intentions during a single day, or struggle to explain an experience that feels frightening or shameful.

Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is intentional self-injury without intent to die in the particular act. Suicidal behavior and NSSI can co-occur, and a previous episode of self-injury warrants assessment of current suicide-related thoughts rather than assumptions about motive. NICE defines self-harm more broadly as intentional self-poisoning or injury regardless of apparent purpose, emphasizing a need for psychosocial assessment across these presentations. Terms, medical consequences, and the person's account all matter to clinical understanding. NICE guideline NG225 provides the relevant clinical framework.

Adolescence involves rapid changes in social relationships, reward sensitivity, emotional regulation, bodily development, identity, and dependence on caregivers. School pressure, interpersonal loss, rejection, bullying, discrimination, family conflict, online experiences, sleep disruption, substance use, and psychiatric symptoms can interact. The central scientific point is heterogeneity: similar outward language may emerge from different internal experiences, while a person who appears composed may be in substantial distress. A parent's interpretation of tone, temperament, or academic achievement cannot replace an individualized conversation and assessment.

An acute suicidal crisis and persistent suicidal thoughts

An acute suicidal crisis can involve a rapid escalation of distress, a narrowing of perceived options, increasing intention, preparation, agitation, intoxication, or a major change from the teen's usual functioning. Persistent or recurrent suicidal ideation can last longer and fluctuate with treatment, relationships, sleep, and life events. Longstanding thoughts require assessment and sustained care; a sudden shift in content, intent, behavior, or circumstances demands reassessment. Clinical teams distinguish a person's enduring vulnerabilities from the immediate conditions that make an episode more dangerous, while recognizing that prediction remains limited. The 2024 VA/DoD suicide-risk guideline describes identification, comprehensive assessment, and management as linked clinical decisions; its military and veteran populations should be considered when applying evidence to adolescents.

Recognizing warning signs and interpreting changes

Parents may first notice statements that life is unbearable, withdrawal from friends, intense hopelessness, dramatic changes in sleep, escalating substance use, severe agitation, giving away meaningful possessions, preoccupation with death, or unexpected behavior following a painful event. Direct disclosure of suicidal thoughts, preparation for an attempt, and a recent attempt carry immediate clinical importance. Changes should be interpreted in relation to the individual's baseline and current environment. The CDC's risk and protective factor guidance emphasizes that no single circumstance explains suicide and that associated factors are not personal predictions.

Warning signs are observable changes that may indicate an emerging crisis. Risk factors describe characteristics or exposures associated with higher rates across groups, such as previous attempts, psychiatric illness, victimization, or poor access to treatment. Protective factors include supportive relationships, connection to school and community, coping abilities, and available, high-quality care. Immediate clinical risk is formulated through the present situation, the teen's own report, current intent and behavior, available supervision, and access to dangerous items. A caregiver's goal is to respond to concerns quickly, even without certainty about what the future holds.

When a teen seems relieved or denies suicidal thoughts

A sudden improvement in mood does not alone establish safety. Relief may follow meaningful support, resolution of a problem, or a clinically significant change requiring exploration. Likewise, a denial of suicidal thoughts during a hurried conversation does not reliably exclude danger, especially if the young person fears punishment, involuntary disclosure, or hospitalization. Ask privately, observe changes, and convey concrete facts to a clinician. Avoid adversarial questioning or making the teen prove they are in crisis before help is offered.

The first conversation: direct questions, careful listening, and a steady response

A parent can begin with an observation: “I've noticed you're carrying a lot, and I'm worried about your safety.” Follow with a plain question such as “Have you been thinking about suicide?” and, when appropriate, “Are you thinking about acting on those thoughts right now?” Research summarized by NIMH finds that asking about suicide does not create suicidal thoughts. Open questions such as “What has been most painful lately?” and “What helps you feel safer when things become overwhelming?” invite the teenager's experience into the conversation.

Listen without rushing to correct emotions or debate whether the problems are objectively serious. Reflect what was said in ordinary language: “That sounds exhausting,” or “I'm glad you told me; I want to understand and get help with you.” Thank the teen for disclosing. Explain each next step and preserve their involvement whenever safety permits. A teenager may need pauses, an alternative trusted adult, written communication, or a clinician experienced in their neurodevelopmental, cultural, or language needs. The quality of the conversation is measured by safety, understanding, and continued connection, not by obtaining an immediate promise that everything is fine.

Threats, punishment, humiliating questions, accusations of attention-seeking, or turning the disclosure into a test of loyalty can discourage future help-seeking. Some teens first speak to a friend, teacher, sibling, coach, or counselor. Caregivers should thank the person who raised the concern, protect the teen's dignity, and coordinate support responsibly. If family dynamics are part of the danger, a safe alternative adult and safeguarding professionals should guide the response.

What to say when the teenager asks for secrecy

Explain confidentiality with honesty: “I will respect your privacy as much as possible, and I need to involve people who can help keep you safe.” Identify which information must be shared with emergency or mental health professionals and, where possible, involve the teen in choosing how to share it. Adolescents need opportunities to speak privately with clinicians because disclosure can change in the absence of family members. Professionals must also address legal duties, consent, mandated reporting, safeguarding, and the evolving capacity of minors according to the jurisdiction and clinical circumstances.

Immediate safety decisions: when emergency help is needed

Seek immediate emergency assessment after an attempt or suspected medically dangerous self-harm, with current suicidal intent or preparation, when the teen cannot remain safe with available supervision, or when severe agitation, intoxication, psychosis, or loss of behavioral control impairs safety. Stay nearby and maintain active adult supervision while arranging professional assistance. Do not leave an acutely unsafe teenager alone or ask another minor to bear the responsibility for their safety. If a potentially dangerous substance or injury is involved, emergency medical evaluation is needed even when the teen initially looks physically well.

The household should act to reduce access to firearms, medications, sharp implements, and other potentially dangerous items in a manner guided by local safety standards and clinical advice. Firearms should be removed from the immediate environment whenever possible and stored according to appropriate secure practices; medications need controlled storage and caregiver administration when clinically advised. These measures address environmental opportunity during periods of fluctuating distress. The CDC prevention guidance identifies safer environments and connection to care as prevention priorities. Specific restriction plans should be individualized, practical, and checked over time, including in other homes the teen visits.

Calling 988 in the United States can support a caregiver who needs immediate guidance, while 911 is appropriate for an ongoing medical emergency or immediate danger. Emergency clinicians determine medical stabilization, psychiatric evaluation, observation, level of care, and discharge arrangements. Hospital admission may be necessary for some adolescents; others may receive intensive outpatient or community treatment with a robust safety and supervision arrangement. These are clinician-led decisions informed by the current presentation and available resources, not predetermined by a brief questionnaire or a parent's willingness alone.

What professional suicide-risk assessment involves

A skilled adolescent-focused assessment examines the teen's thoughts and feelings, current intent, recent behavior, previous attempts or self-injury, access to means, substance use, agitation, sleep, trauma exposure, psychiatric and medical symptoms, relationships, development, neurodivergence, and home safety. It also identifies reasons for living, trusted people, protective routines, treatment preferences, and realistic family capabilities. The assessor may interview the teen privately and obtain caregiver information separately, then develop a collaborative formulation. NICE NG225 directs clinicians assessing young people after self-harm to explore peer, school, home, internet, and safeguarding contexts.

Clinical screening instruments may identify people who need further assessment. NIMH's Ask Suicide-Screening Questions toolkit provides a structured youth screening pathway and follow-up clinical safety assessment. A positive screen initiates assessment and an appropriate response; it is not a diagnosis or a forecast of suicide. A negative result may be superseded by concerning history or clinical observation. NICE explicitly advises against using risk scales or low-, medium-, and high-risk labels to predict future suicide, decide who receives treatment, or determine discharge. Clinical risk formulation and needs-based care address the young person's evolving situation.

A parent contributes specific observations, including the date of statements, relevant events, behavioral changes, previous attempts, current supervision capacity, medication access, and school concerns. Caregivers should communicate inconsistencies between a teen's account and observed behavior respectfully and factually. The youth's own explanation must remain central. When caregivers disagree or home relationships are unsafe, professionals should arrange private assessment and an appropriate safeguarding response.

Differential assessment and co-occurring conditions

Suicidal thoughts occur with and without major depressive disorder. Clinicians consider anxiety, trauma-related disorders, bipolar mood episodes, substance use, psychosis, eating disorders, chronic illness or pain, sleep disorders, neurodevelopmental differences, and severe relational stress. A sudden change in energy, behavior, or sleep alongside unusual mood symptoms may require assessment for bipolar illness; voices, disorganization, or disturbed reality testing require specialist evaluation. Intrusive, unwanted self-harm thoughts associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder must be distinguished through an assessment of distress, compulsions, and actual intent. These distinctions belong to comprehensive care and each condition has its own canonical clinical literature.

Why teenagers become suicidal: a multilevel research perspective

Psychological explanations include hopelessness, unbearable emotional pain, perceived entrapment, difficulties regulating acute emotions, burdensomeness, social disconnection, and the transition from suicidal thinking to action. Ideation-to-action theories propose that the factors producing suicidal thoughts partly differ from those associated with attempting suicide. These models help researchers organize hypotheses; their predictive performance for an individual adolescent remains limited. Developmental context adds rapidly changing peer status, family dependence, exposure to exclusion, emerging autonomy, and access to supportive adults. No single theory explains the diversity of adolescent suicidal crises.

Biological and clinical contributors include vulnerability to mood dysregulation, sleep deprivation, substance intoxication, and psychiatric symptoms; social contributors include violence, bullying, racism, discrimination, family instability, and barriers to health care. Online experiences can provide solidarity and access to resources while also exposing vulnerable teenagers to harassment or harmful content. The task of assessment is to trace interactions in this individual rather than infer a universal cause from a single event or identity. The CDC's multilevel framework treats suicide prevention as a matter of individual, relationship, community, and societal conditions.

What population statistics can tell parents

The CDC's 2023 U.S. Youth Risk Behavior Survey reported that 20.4% of surveyed high school students seriously considered attempting suicide during the previous year, and 9.5% reported an attempt. These self-reported survey indicators describe the population at a particular time and involve sampling, wording, recall, and disclosure limitations. They cannot determine whether one teenager will attempt suicide, and they should not be treated as interchangeable with clinical diagnoses or death rates. Differences across subgroups call attention to unequal exposure and access to support, rather than defining the inherent risk of a person or identity. CDC YRBS analysis.

Family involvement, adolescent autonomy, and safeguarding

Effective caregiver involvement balances meaningful protection and the young person's increasing autonomy. A collaborative approach invites adolescents to identify trusted people, helpful coping steps, warning signs, and preferences for communication. Parents can coordinate transportation, appointments, home safety, medication management, communication with school, and follow-up after a crisis. The goal is a functioning care network in which responsibility is shared by competent adults and professionals, with the teen participating as much as possible. Caregivers may themselves require mental health support and practical help during an extended crisis.

Where the household includes abuse, coercion, threats, or rejection, ordinary assumptions about family involvement may be unsafe. Clinicians should assess who can provide safety, whether alternative guardians or supportive adults are available, and whether child-protection services or legal measures are necessary. LGBTQ+ adolescents, disabled and neurodivergent teens, and young people exposed to discrimination may need affirming services, accessible communication, and explicit protection from hostility. A caregiver's role is to support the young person's dignity and access to competent care, with individualized adjustments rather than stereotype-based assumptions.

Collaborative safety planning with teenagers

A collaborative safety plan is a brief, personally meaningful document developed with the young person and ideally a clinician. It identifies their own warning signs, coping actions, supportive people and places, adults to contact, professional and crisis resources, and concrete steps to reduce access to dangerous items. Caregivers should know their agreed responsibilities and practice where the plan can be found. The plan is updated when risk, household arrangements, or treatment changes. It works best as part of professional assessment, active treatment, and follow-up rather than as a form filed away after a single conversation.

The evidence requires precision. A 2025 systematic review in JAMA Pediatrics evaluated safety planning as a standalone intervention among children and adolescents and found limited evidence of benefit for suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviors, attempts, or health-care re-presentation. The review included small, heterogeneous studies with moderate-to-high risk of bias, and a 2026 correction to one extracted outcome did not change its overarching clinical conclusions. This finding concerns standalone youth safety planning, not the entire package of family involvement, treatment, means safety, and coordinated follow-up. Albaum et al. and the 2026 correction.

A written safety plan is more useful than a promise or contract not to attempt suicide. It should describe actionable support, realistic supervision, and routes to clinical care. If a teen cannot engage safely with the plan, or if the adults cannot implement the necessary protections, an urgent reassessment of the level of care is indicated. Plans should be accessible in the adolescent's preferred language and format and should not rely on the teenager carrying sole responsibility for crisis prevention.

Treatments with evidence in suicidal and self-harming adolescents

Treatment targets both immediate suicidal danger and the clinical or social processes contributing to repeated crises. Clinical care may include specialized psychotherapy, management of psychiatric and medical conditions, family intervention, school coordination, and planned transitions between care settings. Outcomes must be distinguished: a reduction in thoughts, fewer self-harm episodes, fewer suicide attempts, fewer emergency visits, and lower suicide mortality represent different endpoints. A therapy with evidence for one endpoint is not automatically proven to change the others.

Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents

DBT-A combines individual therapy, skills learning, family or caregiver involvement, and crisis-oriented support for young people with significant emotion dysregulation and repeated self-harm or suicidal behavior. In a multisite randomized trial of 173 highly at-risk adolescents aged 12–18, McCauley and colleagues found advantages for DBT over individual and group supportive therapy on suicide attempts, NSSI, and total self-harm at the end of treatment, with differences weakening at later follow-up. These findings support DBT-A in appropriately selected high-risk youth and do not demonstrate an effect on suicide mortality. The 2018 randomized trial and the 2021 Cochrane review provide the strongest directly relevant synthesized evidence among the specific therapies reviewed.

Family-based and cognitive-behavioral interventions

Family interventions can target communication, monitoring, conflict reduction, collaborative problem-solving, and coordinated safety. A randomized trial of the SAFETY cognitive-behavioral family intervention in adolescents with recent attempts or self-harm found a favorable short-term outcome for attempts relative to an enhanced usual-care comparison; its small sample and restricted follow-up limit broad generalization. Asarnow and colleagues' trial supports careful investigation and clinical use where appropriate. Family-based crisis intervention trials have also evaluated empowerment, satisfaction, and discharge outcomes, which should not be equated with suicide-death prevention.

Cognitive behavioral therapy and other structured interventions may be selected for depression, anxiety, trauma, or suicide-focused problems according to the young person's presentation and available expertise. The Cochrane synthesis for adolescents who self-harm found stronger support for DBT-A on repetition of self-harm than for many other tested approaches, while emphasizing that studies of several treatments were small. A teenager's access, culture, disability accommodations, family safety, and therapeutic alliance shape the feasibility of effective care.

Medication and integrated psychiatric care

No medication should be represented as a universal acute solution for teenage suicidal ideation. Pharmacotherapy may be appropriate for a diagnosed depressive, bipolar, psychotic, anxiety, or other condition after individualized evaluation, with age-specific prescribing safeguards and monitoring. Clinicians review possible treatment benefits, adverse effects, adherence, substance use, and changes in agitation or suicidal thoughts. Parents should communicate changes promptly and follow the prescriber's instructions, including any medication security arrangements. Medication management belongs alongside crisis planning and psychological care rather than replacing them.

Emergency departments, hospitalization, and the first days after discharge

Emergency medical and mental health teams assess physical injuries or toxic exposures, the present suicidal state, current psychiatric needs, ability to participate in assessment, supervision, and feasible community support. Hospital admission can provide stabilization where continuous protection or intensive treatment is necessary. Discharge requires an individualized arrangement for the next step: who will stay with the teen, which items have been secured, which appointments are arranged, what the teen and family will do if symptoms worsen, and how treatment information moves between services. NICE recommends age-appropriate mental health assessment following self-harm and coordinated aftercare.

Care transitions deserve particular attention because adolescent needs can change rapidly and families can struggle to arrange services. Parents should request a written care plan, explicit emergency instructions, a confirmed follow-up contact, and clear responsibility for prescriptions and school communication. Even when a teen feels better after an emergency visit, ongoing engagement matters. Routine check-ins should be gentle, specific, and revisited as trust grows. Hospitalization, outpatient care, and home supervision are not opposing choices; they are components of an adaptive care pathway chosen through clinical assessment.

Working with schools, peers, and online environments

A school can help coordinate attendance flexibility, a designated trusted staff member, reasonable adjustments, a re-entry plan after hospitalization, and prompt response to bullying or harassment. Information sharing should follow consent, privacy, and safeguarding requirements while ensuring that essential safety instructions reach relevant staff. Peer friends can offer belonging and help notify responsible adults but should never be asked to monitor a suicidal teen alone. The developmental challenge is to preserve ordinary friendship, learning, and identity while ensuring trained adults remain accountable for clinical decisions.

Caregivers can ask how digital communication affects the teen's distress, sleep, sense of connection, and exposure to harassment. Review online safety collaboratively, respond to specific harmful interactions, and support access to reliable resources. Blanket blame of social media may obscure school, family, psychiatric, or community problems. The youth's experience should guide individualized choices about online environments and support.

What to do when the teenager refuses help

A teen may refuse an appointment because of fear, stigma, previous experiences, privacy concerns, or the belief that treatment cannot help. Parents can offer limited choices about the clinician, setting, or accompanying adult while keeping the requirement for safety clear. An initial pediatric appointment, adolescent medicine visit, school counselor, mobile crisis assessment, or psychiatric evaluation can form an entry point depending on acuity. Explain concretely what will happen and what information may be shared. When immediate danger exists, obtain emergency assessment regardless of reluctance, following relevant laws and clinical procedures.

If the teenager denies suicidal intent yet another person reports worrying behavior, provide the clinician with the observed information and ask about a prompt, confidential assessment. Repeated short conversations may make disclosure easier than one high-pressure interrogation. Professional guidance is especially important when caregivers are divided, unavailable, unsafe, or unable to provide active supervision. Family members can seek their own clinical or crisis consultation while helping the teenager access care.

Long-term recovery and prevention of recurrence

Recovery includes more than the absence of an immediate suicidal thought. It involves rebuilding sleep and daily routines, addressing depression or trauma where present, repairing relationships, strengthening coping and emotion-regulation skills, restoring school and social participation, and making professional support dependable. The pace varies. Some teenagers improve steadily; others experience episodic setbacks. Plans should specify what triggers reassessment, how to access urgent care, and who can assist when primary caregivers are away or exhausted.

A family can schedule regular, brief conversations about emotional state, treatment experience, and practical difficulties without turning every interaction into risk surveillance. Focus on attainable commitments: attending care, responding to new warning signs, maintaining environmental protections, and updating the safety plan with clinicians. Meaningful protective factors arise from consistent relationships and opportunities for connection. The CDC's prevention framework connects individual support with stronger environments and access to care.

Caregiver fatigue and shared responsibility

Supporting a young person in repeated crisis can be physically and emotionally demanding. Parents may experience fear, guilt, anger, exhaustion, or uncertainty, and these feelings deserve direct support. Arrange relief from another safe adult, seek caregiver counseling where useful, and ask the treatment team for clear contact instructions. Good family care includes realistic boundaries, conflict repair, and professional collaboration. The teenager benefits when adults can respond consistently without making the young person responsible for the caregiver's emotional stability.

Scientific uncertainty, ethics, and what the evidence establishes

Research on adolescent suicide prevention faces serious measurement difficulties. Suicidal thoughts are more common than attempts, and suicide deaths are relatively rare endpoints in treatment trials. Studies vary in definitions of self-harm, clinical severity, baseline treatment, age, follow-up duration, and methods of collecting youth and caregiver reports. Randomized trials often exclude people with complicated comorbidities or highly unstable circumstances. Observational associations between family support, connectedness, or service contact and better outcomes can be affected by confounding. These limitations require precision when translating evidence into recommendations.

The strongest treatment claim in the reviewed youth self-harm literature concerns reduced repetition of self-harm in selected adolescents receiving DBT-A, while research on single-session safety planning as standalone youth treatment remains limited. Evidence for many family interventions is promising but heterogeneous; reductions in suicidal ideation, attempts, emergency re-presentation, and mortality cannot be treated as a single effect. Ethical care requires avoiding stigma, respecting adolescent voice and confidentiality, supporting families, and ensuring clear emergency pathways and access to longer-term treatment. Witt et al., McCauley et al., and Albaum et al. illustrate these distinct evidence boundaries.

Questions parents and caregivers commonly ask

Does asking my teenager about suicide put the idea in their head?

Direct, calm questions about suicidal thinking are a recommended part of recognizing distress and establishing a route to care. NIMH reports that asking about suicide does not cause an increase in suicidal thinking or behavior. The conversation should be responsive and linked to real support, particularly when a disclosure reveals immediate danger. NIMH guidance.

What if the teenager says they were only joking?

Explore the context, meaning, and emotional state without accusation. A statement made in anger or humor may reflect a range of experiences, including distress. Ask whether thoughts of death or suicide have occurred outside that moment, whether there has been preparation or previous behavior, and whether the teen feels safe now. Persisting concern, other warning signs, or any reported attempt warrants professional evaluation.

Can parents rely on a negative screening result?

A screening result helps clinicians organize next steps but cannot independently establish that future suicide risk is absent. A clinician may need to assess a teen with a negative screen because of history, observed change, or a credible report from others. The NIMH ASQ clinical pathway and NICE NG225 illustrate the different functions of screening and individualized assessment.

Should the teenager return to school immediately after a crisis?

The answer depends on clinical stabilization, the young person's preferences, the school environment, and the support available. A clinician-informed re-entry plan can address schedule, confidentiality, academic adjustments, known stressors, and a staff contact. Return to ordinary developmental activities is meaningful, but it should occur within a realistic safety and treatment plan.

What happens when suicidal thoughts continue despite treatment?

Persistent thoughts call for renewed clinical formulation and a review of symptom changes, treatment fit, attendance barriers, home safety, comorbid conditions, and trust in the care relationship. A teenager can require a different treatment intensity or modality. Families should communicate specific changes and ensure renewed access to urgent assessment if intent, planning, behavioral control, or environmental safety worsens. Continued support and reevaluation form part of longitudinal care.

Related Articles

Cluster Suicide Prevention, Self-Harm and Crisis Care — The parent scientific chapter on suicide prevention, assessment, interventions, and population-level care.

Suicide Risk in Autistic Adults: Evidence, Assessment, and Prevention — An adjacent, distinct analysis of autism-related adult evidence and assessment.

Suicidal OCD: Intrusive Self-Harm Thoughts, Compulsions, and the Difference From Suicidal Intent — Differentiating intrusive obsessional content from intention.

BPD and Self-Harm: Risk, Safety Planning, and Treatment — A condition-specific treatment and safety discussion.

Bipolar Disorder and Suicide Risk: Evidence, Warning Signs, and Care — Suicidality in a mood-disorder context.

Schizophrenia and Suicide Risk: Prevention and Clinical Support — Psychiatric assessment and support in psychosis-related contexts.

Grief and Suicidal Thoughts: Support and Safety — A separate account of bereavement-related suicidal distress.

What to Do If You Are Thinking About Suicide — Find immediate steps toward safety, human support, emergency care, and continued treatment.

How to Help Someone Who Is Suicidal: Communication and Safety — Learn supportive questions, immediate safety actions, and how to involve professional services.

How to Help Someone Who Self-Harms: Support and Professional Care — Learn how to respond compassionately, assess immediate safety, and support treatment.

Suicidal Ideation: Meaning, Types, and Clinical Significance — Definitions and types of suicidal thinking, clinical assessment, and evidence-based safety considerations.

References

Albaum, C., Irwin, S. H., Muha, J., et al. (2025; corrected 2026). Safety planning interventions for suicide prevention in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 179(8), 886–895. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.1012.

Asarnow, J. R., Hughes, J. L., Babeva, K. N., and Sugar, C. A. (2017). Cognitive-behavioral family treatment for suicide attempt prevention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(6), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.015.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Mental health and suicide risk among high school students and protective factors: Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023. MMWR. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/su/su7304a9.htm.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Preventing suicide. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/prevention/.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Risk and protective factors for suicide. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/risk-factors/.

JAMA Pediatrics. (2026). Data-entry error in meta-analysis of suicide prevention in children and adolescents. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2781.

Korczak, D. J. (2026). Data-entry error in meta-analysis of safety planning interventions for suicide prevention in children and adolescents. JAMA Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.2731.

McCauley, E., Berk, M. S., Asarnow, J. R., et al. (2018). Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents at high risk for suicide: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(8), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2022; last reviewed 2024). Self-harm: Assessment, management and preventing recurrence (NG225). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng225.

National Institute of Mental Health. (2024). 5 action steps to help someone having thoughts of suicide. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/5-action-steps-to-help-someone-having-thoughts-of-suicide.

National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Youth ASQ toolkit. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/research-conducted-at-nimh/asq-toolkit-materials/youth-asq-toolkit.

Ougrin, D., Tranah, T., Stahl, D., Moran, P., and Asarnow, J. R. (2015). Therapeutic interventions for suicide attempts and self-harm in adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(2), 97–107.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.10.009.

Suicide and Crisis Lifeline (988). (n.d.). Official U.S. crisis support service. https://988lifeline.org/.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense. (2024). Clinical practice guideline for assessment and management of patients at risk for suicide. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/mh/srb/.

Witt, K. G., Hetrick, S. E., Rajaram, G., et al. (2021). Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD013667. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013667.pub2.