Sugar vs Maple Syrup: Sweetness, Nutrition, Taste, and Uses
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Sugar and maple syrup can both sweeten a recipe, but they are not interchangeable versions of the same ingredient. Ordinary granulated table sugar is a dry crystalline sweetener made primarily of sucrose. Pure maple syrup is a concentrated maple-sap product that contains substantial water, mostly sucrose among its sugars, and a mixture of flavor-active and minor non-sugar compounds. That difference changes sweetness perception, aroma, color, moisture, texture, browning, and the way each ingredient behaves in cooking and baking.
For nutrition, the most important point is simple: both count as added sugar in the U.S. labeling context when used as sweeteners, and maple syrup is also a free sugar under the World Health Organization definition. Maple syrup contains some minerals and phenolic compounds that refined table sugar largely lacks, but it remains a sugar-rich sweetener rather than a nutritionally dense food. A small human trial published in 2024 reported favorable changes in several cardiometabolic outcomes when maple syrup replaced an equal caloric amount of refined sugar in adults with mild metabolic alterations, but that evidence is preliminary and does not justify treating maple syrup as a therapeutic food or as unrestricted sugar.
This article compares the two ingredients as foods first: what they are, how sweet they taste, how their nutrition differs, what happens in baking and cooking, and where one works better than the other. It then explains the sensory and consumer psychology that can make maple syrup feel richer, more natural, or healthier even when the dietary difference is smaller than the label or flavor suggests.
Quick answer: sugar vs maple syrup
If you want neutral sweetness, dry structure, predictable crystallization, and standard baking behavior, granulated sugar is usually the more controllable ingredient. If you want sweetness plus maple aroma, a liquid sweetener, deeper color, and a recognizable flavor identity, pure maple syrup can be the better culinary choice.
Maple syrup is less concentrated in sugar by weight because it contains water. USDA FoodData Central reference data list granulated sugar at roughly 100 grams of carbohydrate per 100 grams and pure maple syrup at about 67 grams of carbohydrate per 100 grams, with about 60.5 grams of total sugars. That does not mean a spoonful of maple syrup is automatically much lower in calories than a spoonful of granulated sugar, because syrup is denser and volume comparisons do not match weight comparisons. For exact packaged-product values, use the product label and the USDA FoodData Central database.
Pure maple syrup has a more complex flavor. The classic maple profile develops as sap is concentrated and heated, producing a range of aroma and color compounds. U.S. maple grades explicitly connect color class with flavor intensity: Golden is described as delicate, Amber as rich, Dark as robust, and Very Dark as strong in the USDA maple syrup standards.
Neither ingredient receives a universal health advantage simply because one is less processed or comes from tree sap. The more defensible comparison is functional: maple syrup contributes flavor, water, and small amounts of micronutrients and phytochemicals; table sugar contributes almost pure sucrose in a dry crystalline form. Total intake, portion, dietary pattern, and the food carrying the sweetener matter more than a natural-versus-refined story.
What does sugar mean in this comparison?
In this article, sugar means ordinary white granulated table sugar, the familiar crystalline ingredient used in coffee, baking, desserts, preserves, and household cooking. It is primarily sucrose. Readers who need a broader ingredient guide can use our Granulated Sugar and White Sugar pages.
This definition matters because sugar can also mean a chemical class that includes glucose, fructose, sucrose, lactose, maltose, and other sugars. It can mean total sugars on a Nutrition Facts label, added sugars under FDA labeling rules, or free sugars in WHO public-health guidance. Those categories overlap, but they are not identical.
The comparison here is therefore ingredient versus ingredient: dry granulated sucrose versus pure maple syrup. It is not a comparison of dietary sugar as a whole with every maple-derived product, and it is not a blood-glucose management guide.
What is pure maple syrup?
Under the U.S. federal standard of identity, maple syrup is derived by concentrating and heat-treating maple sap, or by dissolving maple sugar made from such sap in water. The standard requires at least 66 percent soluble solids by weight from maple sap. The current text is available in 21 CFR 168.140.
Maple sap begins as a dilute liquid in which water dominates. Concentration removes much of that water. During heating and processing, the chemistry and sensory profile change. Reviews of maple production and composition describe sucrose as the dominant sugar while also documenting organic acids, minerals, phenolic compounds, and flavor-active molecules. A classic review by Perkins and van den Berg explains how seasonal sap chemistry and heating contribute to the color and flavor range of maple syrup (PubMed).
Pure maple syrup should also be distinguished from maple-flavored pancake syrups. A product can taste maple-like while being based largely on corn syrup or other sweeteners and flavorings. For this comparison, maple syrup means the pure maple product described by the federal standard, not every breakfast syrup with maple imagery on the package.
Maple syrup is also different from maple sugar. Maple sugar is a solid maple product made by concentrating maple syrup further and encouraging crystallization. Our Maple Sugar article covers that ingredient separately.
Composition: dry sucrose crystals versus a concentrated syrup
The most important physical difference is water. Granulated sugar is almost entirely dry carbohydrate. Maple syrup remains a concentrated aqueous solution. That one fact explains much of the difference in recipe behavior.
Maple syrup is still predominantly a sucrose-based sweetener. The 2021 review by Ramadan, Gad, and Farag describes sucrose as the predominant ingredient and also notes phenolics, pyrazines, minerals, organic acids, vitamins, and other minor constituents (PubMed). Those minor compounds help make maple syrup chemically and sensorially distinct from a plain sucrose solution.
Granulated sugar, by contrast, is useful precisely because it is standardized, dry, neutral in aroma, and structurally predictable. In many recipes, those properties are as important as sweetness itself.
Which is sweeter: sugar or maple syrup?
There is no single useful answer that applies to every food, because perceived sweetness is not determined by sugar concentration alone. Granulated sugar delivers a comparatively clean sucrose sweetness. Maple syrup combines sweetness with aroma, color, viscosity, temperature-dependent release of volatile compounds, and learned expectations about maple flavor.
By weight, granulated sugar contains more sugar because it has almost no water. Pure maple syrup contains a substantial water fraction. Yet a richly aromatic maple syrup can taste intense even when the measurable sugar concentration is lower, because sweetness is experienced as part of a multisensory flavor system rather than as an isolated receptor signal.
A review of sweetness perception by Wang and colleagues found that aroma, color, texture, packaging, and other intrinsic and extrinsic cues can influence perceived sweetness and liking (PubMed). This is why which is sweeter depends on whether you mean sucrose concentration, sweetness at equal weight, sweetness at equal volume, or the overall intensity of the eating experience.
Taste and aroma: why maple syrup tastes like more than sweet
Table sugar contributes sweetness with very little characteristic aroma. Maple syrup contributes sweetness plus a recognizable aromatic profile that can include caramel-like, vanilla-like, toasted, woody, nutty, and other notes depending on grade, origin, and processing. The exact sensory vocabulary varies, but the broader principle is well established: maple flavor changes as sap chemistry and heat-driven reactions change.
The USDA grade system makes this practical. Lighter syrup is associated with a more delicate taste, while darker grades move toward robust and strong flavor. Darker does not mean lower quality; it means a different color-and-flavor class within the standard.
This gives maple syrup a kind of sensory efficiency. A smaller change in the ingredient can alter not only sweetness but also aroma and color. In oatmeal, yogurt, coffee, glazes, roasted vegetables, sauces, and baked goods, that added aromatic information may make the finished food seem more flavorful than the same numerical amount of sweetness from white sugar.
Calories and sugar content: why weight and volume tell different stories
On a 100-gram basis, pure maple syrup provides fewer calories and less carbohydrate than granulated sugar because roughly one-third of maple syrup is water. USDA reference data have historically listed granulated sugar at about 387 kcal per 100 grams and maple syrup at about 260 kcal per 100 grams. These are reference values rather than guarantees for every brand.
Volume comparisons are less intuitive. Syrup is denser than loose granulated sugar, so a tablespoon of maple syrup can weigh substantially more than a tablespoon of sugar. The calorie difference per spoonful is therefore much smaller than the per-100-gram difference suggests, and depending on the measurement and product it can disappear or reverse.
This is a useful example of serving-size psychology. People often compare one spoon with one spoon while nutrition databases frequently compare equal weights. Equal volume, equal weight, equal sweetness, and equal calories are four different comparisons. A careful sugar-versus-maple-syrup answer has to state which comparison is being made.
Does maple syrup have more nutrients than white sugar?
Yes, pure maple syrup contains measurable minerals and other non-sugar compounds that refined white sugar contains in negligible amounts. Reviews report minerals such as manganese, calcium, potassium, magnesium, and zinc, together with phenolic compounds and organic acids. This is a real compositional difference.
The practical nutritional meaning is more modest. Maple syrup is usually eaten in quantities chosen for sweetness, not as a primary source of micronutrients. Increasing the amount of syrup to obtain more minerals simultaneously increases sugar and calories. The presence of micronutrients therefore supports the statement that maple syrup has a more diverse composition, but it does not support the stronger claim that maple syrup is a nutrient-dense replacement for whole foods.
The 2023 comprehensive review by Mohammed and colleagues summarizes nutritional and sensory properties while also emphasizing that stronger human research is still needed to establish therapeutic or clinically meaningful benefits relative to refined sugars (PubMed).
Is maple syrup healthier than sugar?
The best evidence-based answer is conditional. Maple syrup has some compositional advantages over refined sugar: it contains water, minerals, phenolics, and a broader set of minor compounds. It can also replace refined sugar in some foods while delivering a distinctive flavor that may allow a person to prefer a different formulation. Those are legitimate differences.
At the same time, both ingredients are concentrated sweeteners. The FDA classifies table sugar and sugars from syrups within added sugars when they are used as sweeteners, and its Nutrition Facts guidance specifically discusses single-ingredient table sugar and maple syrup in the added-sugars framework (FDA). WHO defines free sugars broadly enough to include sugars naturally present in syrups as well as sugars added by the manufacturer, cook, or consumer (WHO).
A 2024 randomized, double-blind, crossover trial adds an important but still preliminary piece of evidence. Forty-two adults with overweight and mild cardiometabolic alterations replaced 5 percent of total energy from added sugars with either maple syrup or a flavored sucrose syrup for eight weeks. The maple-syrup condition produced statistically favorable differences in several measured outcomes, including glucose response, android fat mass, and systolic blood pressure (Morissette et al., 2024).
That trial is relevant because it studied actual substitution in humans, not only isolated compounds or laboratory models. Its scope is also narrow: a small sample, a specific population, one intervention dose, and an eight-week period. It supports further research; it does not establish maple syrup as a treatment for diabetes, hypertension, obesity, or any other condition, and it does not convert unlimited syrup intake into a health-promoting behavior.
Added sugar and free sugar: the labeling distinction
In U.S. labeling, Added Sugars is a regulatory category. FDA explains that added sugars include sugars packaged as sweeteners, including table sugar, and sugars from syrups and honey. Single-ingredient sugar and syrup products have special declaration rules so the label does not misleadingly imply that another sugar was added to the product itself.
WHO uses free sugars for a broader public-health concept. Free sugars include monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods or beverages by manufacturers, cooks, or consumers, plus sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates. In that framework, maple syrup counts as free sugar even though its sugars originated in maple sap.
This distinction is important because naturally occurring in the source ingredient and outside public-health sugar guidance are not the same claim. Maple syrup can be a natural plant-derived product while its sugars still count in a free-sugars framework.
What happens when you replace sugar with maple syrup in baking?
The recipe changes in at least four ways at once: water increases, sucrose concentration changes, flavor changes, and the physical form changes from crystals to syrup. That is why a direct one-for-one substitution by volume is not universally reliable.
Sucrose does much more in cakes than sweeten. A review by Slade, Kweon, and Levine describes effects on starch gelatinization, gluten development, water relations, shape, color, and texture (PubMed). Related food-science work shows that changing sucrose or replacing it can alter batter viscosity, structure setting, moisture retention, and final texture.
When maple syrup replaces granulated sugar, the added water can make a batter looser and can change the balance between flour, fat, egg, starch, and dissolved sugars. In cookies, changes in available water and dissolved sugar can alter spread and set. In cakes, they can alter crumb, tenderness, aeration, and the timing of starch and protein transitions.
The safest practical rule is to use a recipe developed for maple syrup when texture matters. If adapting a recipe, treat maple syrup as both sweetener and liquid rather than as wet sugar. Reduce other liquid only when the recipe structure supports that change, and expect some change in color, aroma, and texture. There is no single substitution ratio that works equally well for cookies, cakes, muffins, candies, custards, sauces, and beverages.
Cookies: sugar controls more than sweetness
Crystalline sugar affects cookie spread, surface characteristics, crispness, and structure through its interaction with water, starch, and gluten. Research on sugar-snap cookies shows that sucrose can delay or inhibit gluten cross-linking and affect when the cookie sets during baking. Replacing part of that system with a water-containing syrup changes the physical environment of the dough.
Maple syrup can work beautifully in cookies designed around it, especially where a softer texture and maple aroma are desirable. In a formula developed around dry granulated sugar, however, simply pouring in an equal volume of syrup can produce more spread, altered browning, or a softer result. The direction and magnitude depend on the whole formula.
Cakes and muffins: moisture and structure become central
Cakes depend on a timed transition from fluid batter to stable crumb. Sucrose affects the viscosity of the liquid phase, starch gelatinization, protein denaturation, and water activity. These structural roles are why sugar reduction and sugar replacement are technically difficult even when another ingredient can supply equivalent sweetness.
Maple syrup brings its own dissolved solids and flavor, but it also brings water. A maple-sweetened cake may therefore require adjustment of other liquids, flour, or mixing strategy. The best result usually comes from formulation rather than from assuming that sweet is sweet.
Candy, caramel, and crystallization
Granulated sucrose is especially useful when a recipe depends on controlled dissolution and recrystallization. Fudge, fondant, brittle, pulled sugar, and many candies rely on concentration, crystal formation, and temperature in ways that make ingredient identity crucial.
Pure maple syrup can make maple candies and confections, but those are their own systems. It should not be expected to behave identically to dry white sugar in a confection where the target texture depends on sucrose crystallization and exact water content.
Sauces, dressings, glazes, and marinades
Liquid applications are more forgiving. Maple syrup dissolves immediately and contributes viscosity, flavor, and color without waiting for crystals to dissolve. It is often convenient in vinaigrettes, glazes, barbecue-style sauces, and marinades where a liquid phase already exists.
Granulated sugar is more neutral. If the intended flavor profile is bright, acidic, herbal, or fruit-forward and maple notes would dominate, white sugar may provide the necessary sweetness with less aromatic interference. Ingredient choice is therefore a flavor-design decision, not merely a nutrition decision.
Breakfast foods, oatmeal, yogurt, and fruit
Maple syrup has a strong cultural and sensory association with breakfast foods. On pancakes and waffles, it contributes moisture, aroma, and coating behavior in addition to sweetness. In oatmeal or plain yogurt, a small amount can change perceived richness because maple aroma interacts with sweetness and warmth.
Granulated sugar gives more isolated control over sweetness. That can be useful when the base food already has strong fruit, spice, chocolate, or coffee aromas and the goal is to sweeten without adding another dominant flavor identity.
Hot and cold drinks
Both dissolve readily in hot drinks, while maple syrup has the practical advantage of already being a liquid. In cold drinks, syrup can disperse more readily than dry crystals, though viscosity still matters. The sensory difference is larger than the mechanical one: maple aroma can change the entire flavor profile of coffee, tea, milk drinks, cocktails, and alcohol-free mixed drinks.
That makes the substitution especially psychological in beverages. A familiar maple aroma can create expectations of warmth, autumn, breakfast, comfort, or craft production before the drink is tasted. Those associations can alter liking without changing the basic biology of sweet taste.
Sensory psychology: sweetness is a multisensory experience
Sweet taste begins with gustatory signaling, but real foods are experienced through integrated taste, smell, texture, temperature, vision, and expectation. Maple syrup is a useful example because its aroma and color are salient. A dark amber syrup does not arrive at the mouth as an anonymous sucrose solution; it arrives with a strong prediction about what the flavor will be.
Research reviewed by Wang and colleagues shows that both intrinsic cues, such as color and aroma, and extrinsic cues, such as packaging and serving context, can influence sweetness perception. This does not mean color creates sugar. It means the brain interprets sweetness within a broader pattern of sensory evidence.
The practical consequence is that equal sugar concentration does not guarantee equal perceived sweetness or equal liking. A maple aroma that is congruent with sweetness can make a product feel more complete or indulgent. Conversely, someone who dislikes maple flavor may judge the same product as less pleasant even when the sugar concentration is unchanged.
Why color changes expectation
Maple syrup color carries learned information. U.S. grade classes pair lighter colors with more delicate flavor and darker colors with stronger flavor. Consumers who know that system may anticipate intensity before tasting. Even consumers who do not know the formal grades can use color as a cue for caramelization, roast, richness, or depth.
Expectation can then shape attention. A person expecting robust flavor may notice toasted or caramel-like notes more readily. This is one reason blind sensory evaluation and branded product evaluation can produce different judgments: the sensory signal is the same product, but the cognitive context differs.
Naturalness and the health halo
Maple syrup has a powerful naturalness story: tree sap, forests, seasonal tapping, concentration, geographic provenance, and a short ingredient list. Those facts can be meaningful parts of food identity and culture. They can also create a health halo when natural is mentally translated into nutritionally superior in every relevant way.
A systematic review by Román, Sánchez-Siles, and Siegrist found that perceived food naturalness is important to many consumers across countries and that people evaluate naturalness through origin, processing, and final-product characteristics (review). Research on food perception also shows that branding and claims can influence perceived healthiness even when those cues do not map cleanly onto nutrient composition (Provencher and Jacob, 2016).
For sugar versus maple syrup, the useful correction is precise. Maple syrup really is compositionally different and less refined as a recognizable whole food ingredient. The inference that it therefore stops functioning as a concentrated sweetener is the part that exceeds the evidence.
Price, provenance, and perceived quality
Pure maple syrup is usually more expensive than table sugar. Price can itself become a quality cue. When a sweetener is tied to a place, harvest season, producer, grade, or artisanal narrative, consumers may perceive greater authenticity and value. Those perceptions can be perfectly legitimate preferences, but they are separate from nutrient density or clinical health effects.
This distinction is useful for purchasing. You may rationally pay more for maple syrup because you value its flavor, production tradition, provenance, or culinary versatility. You do not need to justify that preference by inflating its health properties.
Substitution behavior: when a healthier swap changes more than the ingredient
Food substitutions are behavioral events as well as chemical ones. Replacing sugar with maple syrup can change how much sweetener is used, which foods are chosen, how satisfying the result feels, and whether the new version becomes a lasting habit.
If someone enjoys maple flavor more intensely, a smaller amount may be subjectively sufficient in a particular food. If the healthier label creates permission to pour more freely, intake may move in the opposite direction. Both patterns are plausible, and neither follows automatically from the ingredient itself.
This is why practical nutrition is better served by observing the whole pattern: amount used, frequency, food context, satiety, enjoyment, and whether the substitution displaces or adds calories. The label on the sweetener is only one cue in that system.
Evidence status: what is established, what is promising, and what is overstated
Established evidence
Pure maple syrup is a concentrated maple-sap product containing substantial water and predominantly sucrose among its sugars. It has a broader composition than refined granulated sugar and contains minerals, phenolics, organic acids, and flavor-active compounds. Its color and flavor vary with grade and processing. Granulated sucrose and maple syrup behave differently in baking because one is a dry crystalline solid and the other is an aqueous syrup. FDA and WHO frameworks both count these sweeteners within relevant added/free-sugar concepts when consumed as sweeteners.
Supported but context-dependent evidence
Maple aroma, color, viscosity, labeling, provenance, and price can influence expectations, perceived quality, sweetness experience, and product liking. The direction and size of these effects depend on the person, product, and context. Maple syrup can sometimes improve a recipe specifically because its flavor does more sensory work than neutral sugar, but that is not a universal reduction strategy.
Promising but preliminary evidence
The 2024 crossover trial suggests that replacing a modest share of refined added sugars with maple syrup may produce different cardiometabolic effects in a selected adult population. The study is important enough to change the evidence conversation from only preclinical to early human trial evidence, while remaining too small and specific to establish broad clinical recommendations.
Overstated claims
Claims that maple syrup is basically healthy, does not count as sugar, detoxifies the body, or can be consumed without regard to quantity are not supported by the evidence reviewed here. The presence of antioxidants or minerals does not erase its role as a concentrated source of sugars.
How to choose between sugar and maple syrup
Choose granulated sugar when you want neutral sweetness, a dry ingredient, predictable crystallization, classic cookie or cake behavior, or tight control over texture without maple flavor. Choose maple syrup when its aroma is part of the goal, when a liquid sweetener fits the formulation, or when you want its distinctive color, provenance, and flavor profile.
For routine nutrition decisions, compare realistic portions rather than idealized ingredients. Read the Nutrition Facts label on the actual product. Remember that pure maple syrup and table sugar both contribute to added/free-sugar intake. If you prefer maple syrup, preference itself is a valid reason to use it; it does not need a mythical metabolic exemption.
Frequently asked questions
Is maple syrup better for you than sugar?
Maple syrup contains minerals and phenolic compounds that refined white sugar largely lacks, and early human research suggests possible differences when it replaces refined sugar. It is still a concentrated sugar-rich sweetener. The strongest current answer is that maple syrup has a more complex composition, while broad claims of major health superiority remain unproven.
Is maple syrup lower in calories than sugar?
Per 100 grams, yes, because maple syrup contains substantial water. Per tablespoon, the difference is much smaller because maple syrup is denser than granulated sugar. Compare equal weights or the serving sizes on the products you actually use.
Does maple syrup count as added sugar?
In the FDA Nutrition Facts framework, single-ingredient maple syrup is treated within the added-sugars system, with special labeling rules for single-ingredient sugars and syrups. In WHO guidance, sugars naturally present in syrups are included in free sugars.
Can maple syrup replace sugar one for one in baking?
Not reliably across recipes. Maple syrup adds water and flavor and changes the physical form of the sweetener. A successful conversion may require adjustments to other liquids and may still change browning, texture, spread, crumb, and flavor.
Which is sweeter, maple syrup or sugar?
Granulated sugar is more concentrated in sugar by weight, but perceived sweetness depends on concentration, aroma, texture, temperature, and context. Maple syrup can taste intensely sweet and flavorful even though it contains less sugar per 100 grams.
Is darker maple syrup healthier?
Darkness is primarily a color-and-flavor classification, not a simple health ranking. USDA grades associate darker classes with more robust or strong maple flavor. Composition can vary, but choosing a grade should mainly follow flavor and culinary use unless a specific nutrient analysis says otherwise.
Is maple syrup the same as maple sugar?
No. Maple syrup is a liquid maple product. Maple sugar is a solid product made by further concentrating maple syrup and forming a dry sugar. Their moisture and culinary behavior differ.
Is pancake syrup the same as maple syrup?
No. Maple-flavored pancake syrup may be made from other syrups and flavors. Check the ingredient list. Pure maple syrup is defined by the maple-sap standard of identity.
Related Articles
References
Food and Drug Administration. Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Mohammed, F., Sibley, P., Abdulwali, N., & Guillaume, D. (2023). Nutritional, pharmacological, and sensory properties of maple syrup: A comprehensive review. Heliyon, 9(9), e19216. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19216.
Morissette, A., et al. (2024). Substituting Refined Sugars With Maple Syrup Decreases Key Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Individuals With Mild Metabolic Alterations: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Crossover Trial. The Journal of Nutrition, 154(10), 2963–2975. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.08.014.
Perkins, T. D., & van den Berg, A. K. (2009). Maple syrup-production, composition, chemistry, and sensory characteristics. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 56, 101–143. DOI: 10.1016/S1043-4526(08)00604-9.
Provencher, V., & Jacob, R. (2016). Impact of Perceived Healthiness of Food on Food Choices and Intake. Current Obesity Reports, 5, 65–71. DOI: 10.1007/s13679-016-0192-0.
Ramadan, M. F., Gad, H. A., & Farag, M. A. (2021). Chemistry, processing, and functionality of maple food products: An updated comprehensive review. Journal of Food Biochemistry, e13832. DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13832.
Román, S., Sánchez-Siles, L. M., & Siegrist, M. (2017). The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 67, 44–57.
Slade, L., Kweon, M., & Levine, H. (2021). Exploration of the functionality of sugars in cake-baking, and effects on cake quality. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 61(2), 283–311. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1729694.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. Maple Syrup Grades & Standards.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. FoodData Central. Reference foods discussed: Sugars, granulated and Syrups, maple.
U.S. Government Publishing Office / Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR § 168.140 — Maple sirup.
Wang, Q. J., Mielby, L. A., Junge, J. Y., Bertelsen, A. S., Kidmose, U., Spence, C., & Byrne, D. V. (2019). The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review. Foods, 8(6), 211. DOI: 10.3390/foods8060211.
World Health Organization. (2015). Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. Geneva: WHO.