Sugar on Ingredient Lists: How Order, Names, and Serving Size Matter
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
On a U.S. packaged-food label, the ingredient list and the Nutrition Facts panel answer different questions. The ingredient list tells you what ingredients are present and, with limited exceptions, places them in descending order of predominance by weight. The Nutrition Facts panel tells you how much Total Sugars and Added Sugars are present in a labeled serving. Reading sugar well means using both parts of the package together rather than treating either one as a complete answer.
The most important rule is simple: an ingredient that appears earlier generally weighs more than an ingredient that appears later. The FDA explains that ingredients are listed in descending order of predominance by weight, and the underlying legal rule appears in 21 CFR § 101.4. That order can help you see whether a sweetening ingredient is a major component of a product. It cannot tell you the exact percentage of that ingredient, the total grams of all sugars combined, how sweet the finished food will taste, or whether the food is nutritionally preferable to another product.
Sugar may also appear under more than one ingredient name. A product can contain sucrose, corn syrup, honey, dextrose, fruit juice concentrate, molasses, or other sweetening ingredients in the same formula. Each ingredient is listed according to the applicable labeling rules, so several separate sugar-containing ingredients can occupy different positions. This makes the ingredient list useful for identifying sources but a poor tool for calculating the total quantity of added sugar.
Serving size creates a second layer. The order of ingredients is not recalculated for each serving, but the sugar grams on the Nutrition Facts panel are usually stated per serving. If a package contains two servings and you consume both, you receive twice the nutrient amounts shown for one serving. The FDA emphasizes that serving size reflects how much people typically consume and is not a recommendation.
For the broader label definition of added sugar, see Added Sugar: What It Is, Where It Hides, and How Labels Count It. For the vocabulary itself, see Names for Sugar: Common Terms on Food and Ingredient Labels. This article focuses specifically on the ingredient-list problem: what order means, how names can obscure quick recognition, and why serving size changes the numerical picture.
Quick Answer: How Should You Read Sugar on an Ingredient List?
First, find the ingredient list and scan from the beginning, because the early ingredients generally contribute more weight than the later ingredients. Then identify sugar-containing ingredients by their actual names rather than searching only for the single word “sugar.” Finally, check the Nutrition Facts panel for Total Sugars, Added Sugars, serving size, and servings per container.
Do not add together the positions of sugar ingredients as though ingredient rank were a number. A second-place ingredient plus a seventh-place ingredient does not produce a meaningful “sugar score.” Ingredient rank is ordinal, not quantitative. For actual sugar grams per labeled serving, use the Nutrition Facts panel. FDA’s Added Sugars explanation makes clear that Added Sugars are already included within Total Sugars; the two numbers should not be added together.
A useful mental model is: ingredient list = identity and relative order; Nutrition Facts = quantified nutrition per serving. The two views are complementary.
What Ingredient Order Actually Means
Ingredients are generally listed by weight, from most to least
Under 21 CFR § 101.4(a)(1), ingredients that must be declared are listed by their common or usual names in descending order of predominance by weight. The FDA’s consumer guidance expresses the same rule in plain language: the ingredient used in the greatest amount appears first, followed by ingredients present in smaller amounts.
This is a formulation rule, not a health ranking. Flour appearing before sugar means the flour has greater weight in the food than that particular sugar ingredient under the applicable declaration rule. It does not mean the product is automatically low in added sugar, high in fiber, or nutritionally balanced.
Weight also differs from sweetness. A smaller amount of a highly sweet ingredient may have a large sensory effect, while a larger amount of a less sweet carbohydrate may contribute more mass. Ingredient order therefore tells you something about composition by weight, not the psychological intensity of sweetness.
The list usually does not reveal exact percentages
An ordinary ingredient list normally gives rank order rather than the exact percentage of every ingredient. Section 101.4 allows percentage information when it is included, but the standard descending list itself is not a quantitative recipe. That means “sugar is third” is not equivalent to “the product is X percent sugar.” The exact legal treatment of ingredient declarations is in 21 CFR § 101.4.
This matters when comparing products. Sugar may be fourth in two different foods while the actual amount differs substantially because the weights of the ingredients above and below it differ. Rank alone cannot recover those missing quantities.
There is an important rule for ingredients at 2% or less
U.S. rules include an exception for ingredients present at 2% or less by weight. When the label uses an appropriate statement such as “contains 2% or less of,” the ingredients covered by that statement do not have to follow the ordinary descending-order requirement among themselves. This exception is described in 21 CFR § 101.4(a)(2).
So, near the end of a list, exact rank can become even less informative. A sweetener within a “2% or less” group is present at a low level relative to the product’s weight, but its precise position inside that group should not be treated as a fine-grained measurement.
Compound ingredients can contain their own sub-ingredients
A food ingredient can itself be made from several ingredients. U.S. rules allow a compound ingredient to be declared by its common or usual name followed by a parenthetical list of its components, or under specified conditions by incorporating those components into the main ingredient statement. 21 CFR § 101.4(b)(2) describes these alternatives.
This is especially relevant to sweetened fruit preparations, chocolate pieces, flavored bases, sauces, fillings, and similar components. Sugar may be inside a parenthetical sub-list even when the main ingredient name itself does not sound sweet. Reading only the top-level words can therefore miss a declared sweetening ingredient.
Why Sugar Appears Under Different Names
The ingredient list uses specific ingredient names rather than a single umbrella word for every sweet carbohydrate. In U.S. ingredient labeling, 21 CFR § 101.4(b)(20) states that the term “sugar” refers to sucrose obtained from sugar cane or sugar beets. Other ingredients are identified by their own common or usual names.
Common sweetening ingredients include sugar or sucrose, cane sugar, brown sugar, dextrose, glucose, fructose, corn syrup, high-fructose corn syrup, honey, maple syrup, molasses, agave syrup, invert sugar, malt syrup, and qualifying fruit or vegetable juice concentrates. The exact regulatory treatment of an ingredient matters more than whether its name sounds familiar, traditional, natural, raw, or artisanal.
For a broader map of ingredient terminology, Names for Sugar: Common Terms on Food and Ingredient Labels separates chemical sugar names, ingredient names, syrups, and terms that people often confuse with sugar.
For a narrower guide to ingredients specifically used as sources of added sugar, see Names for Added Sugar: Syrups, Sweeteners, and Ingredient Terms.
The “-ose” shortcut is incomplete
Many sugars have names ending in “-ose,” including glucose, fructose, dextrose, maltose, lactose, and sucrose. That makes the suffix a useful recognition clue, but it is not a complete reading strategy. Honey, molasses, corn syrup, maple syrup, agave syrup, and some juice concentrates do not use the suffix. Conversely, seeing a sugar name tells you what the ingredient is; it does not by itself tell you how many grams are present in a serving.
The safest approach is category recognition rather than a memorized suffix rule: identify sweetening ingredients, then verify the combined quantitative result in the Nutrition Facts panel.
Sugar alcohols and non-sugar sweeteners are separate categories
An ingredient list can also contain sweeteners that are not sugars. Sugar alcohols such as erythritol or xylitol and non-sugar sweeteners such as sucralose, aspartame, stevia-derived sweeteners, or saccharin belong to different categories from sucrose, glucose, and other sugars. Their labeling and physiological characteristics should not be inferred from the rules for Added Sugars.
The presence of a sweet-tasting ingredient therefore does not automatically mean it contributes to the Added Sugars line. Ingredient identity and the applicable regulation determine the category.
Can Several Sugar Ingredients Appear Lower on the List?
Yes. If a formulation uses several separate sweetening ingredients, each one is declared as an ingredient and placed according to the applicable predominance-by-weight rules. As a result, no single sweetener may appear as high as the combined weight of all sweeteners would if they were one ingredient.
This is sometimes called “sugar splitting” in popular discussions. The ingredient-list pattern is real: separate ingredients receive separate positions. The stronger claim that a particular manufacturer intentionally chose multiple sweeteners in order to manipulate perception cannot be established from the label alone. Formulation choices can reflect taste, texture, browning, moisture retention, crystallization, cost, processing performance, or other product-design goals in addition to how the label looks.
For the consumer, the practical solution is not to guess motive. Use the ingredient list to recognize the sources, then use FDA’s Added Sugars line to see the combined amount of added sugars per labeled serving when that declaration applies.
Why Ingredient Position Cannot Tell You the Total Amount of Sugar
Suppose a cereal lists whole-grain oats first, sugar second, nuts third, honey sixth, and molasses eighth. Sugar is clearly an important ingredient by weight because it appears near the beginning. But the list does not reveal the grams contributed by sugar, honey, and molasses, nor does it let you calculate their combined weight from positions 2, 6, and 8.
The Nutrition Facts panel solves a different part of the problem. Total Sugars quantifies all sugars in the serving, including naturally occurring and added sugars. Added Sugars quantifies the subset classified as added under FDA rules. If a food has 12 g Total Sugars and “Includes 8 g Added Sugars,” the food contains 12 g of sugar in total, of which 8 g are Added Sugars. It does not contain 20 g.
For a detailed explanation of that nested relationship, see Total Sugar vs Added Sugar: What Nutrition Labels Mean.
For the dedicated arithmetic when you need to convert the labeled per-serving number to the amount actually consumed, see How to Calculate Added Sugar From a Food Label.
Ingredient List vs Nutrition Facts: The Division of Labor
The ingredient list answers: What is in this food?
The ingredient list identifies the ingredients and generally tells you their relative predominance by weight. It is especially useful for recognizing sweetening sources, seeing whether sugar-containing ingredients occur early or late, and noticing sugar inside compound ingredients.
It is also useful for comparing formulation styles: one product may rely primarily on sucrose, another on corn syrup and honey, and another on a non-sugar sweetener. That is composition information, not a complete nutrition judgment.
The Nutrition Facts panel answers: How much sugar is in a serving?
The FDA’s current Nutrition Facts guidance presents serving information at the top of the panel and nutrition amounts below it. For sugar, Total Sugars and Added Sugars provide the quantitative information that ingredient rank cannot.
The legal requirements for nutrition labeling, including sugars and serving-based declarations, appear in 21 CFR § 101.9.
For the full sugar-specific Nutrition Facts context, see Sugar Nutrition Facts: Calories, Carbohydrates, and Added Sugars.
Why Serving Size Matters So Much
Nutrition numbers are usually reported for one labeled serving. According to FDA serving-size guidance, serving sizes are based on amounts people typically consume, not on a recommendation of how much they should eat or drink. A package may contain more than one serving, and some packages use dual-column labeling to show values both per serving and per package.
That distinction is essential when interpreting sugar. If one serving contains 6 g Added Sugars and you consume two servings, the relevant amount for what you consumed is 12 g Added Sugars. The ingredient list does not change, because the recipe has not changed; only the amount of food consumed has doubled.
Serving size can therefore create a perception gap. A product with a modest-looking sugar number per serving can contribute a larger amount when the portion actually eaten is several servings. Conversely, a large labeled serving may make the per-serving number look larger than a smaller serving of an otherwise similar food. Comparisons are most informative when you notice both the serving basis and the amount you actually intend to consume.
Serving size is a reference unit, not a permission signal
Research suggests consumers do not always interpret serving-size information as regulators intend. A 2019 scoping review found that serving-size information was often poorly understood and could be mistaken for a recommended amount. Effects of labeled serving size on chosen portions and consumption were mixed across the limited evidence base.
That is why a practical label-reading routine treats serving size as a denominator: it tells you what quantity of food the numbers describe. It does not tell you what you personally should eat.
Three Hypothetical Examples
Example 1: Breakfast cereal with two sweeteners
Imagine a cereal with the ingredient list: whole-grain oats, sugar, wheat flour, almonds, canola oil, honey, salt. The early position of sugar tells you it is a relatively substantial ingredient by weight. Honey appears later, so it weighs less than the ingredients before it, subject to the applicable declaration rules.
Now imagine the Nutrition Facts panel lists 11 g Total Sugars and Includes 8 g Added Sugars per 1-cup serving. The correct reading is that one labeled serving has 11 g sugar in total, 8 g of which are Added Sugars. You do not add 11 and 8. You also do not need to estimate how much of the 8 g came from sugar versus honey to understand the label’s total added-sugar quantity.
Example 2: Yogurt with a sweetened fruit preparation
Imagine a yogurt whose list begins: cultured milk, strawberry preparation (strawberries, sugar, water, pectin), cane sugar, natural flavor. Sugar appears inside the parenthetical sub-ingredients of the fruit preparation, and cane sugar appears separately.
A quick scan that looks only for standalone “sugar” entries at the top level can miss the sugar inside the compound ingredient. The Nutrition Facts panel then tells you the combined Total Sugars and Added Sugars for the serving. This is a good example of why ingredient hierarchy and nutrition quantities must be read together.
Example 3: Sauce with a small labeled serving
Imagine a sauce with tomatoes, water, sugar, vinegar, molasses, spices, and salt, with 5 g Added Sugars per 2-tablespoon serving. If you use 4 tablespoons, you have used two labeled servings, so the sugar amount associated with the portion is twice the per-serving amount. The ingredient order remains the same.
This example also shows why a small household serving can anchor attention. The printed number may feel small because the denominator is small. Checking how many labeled servings match the portion you actually use prevents that denominator from disappearing from the judgment.
Total Sugars, Added Sugars, and Free Sugars Are Different Concepts
On U.S. Nutrition Facts labels, Total Sugars includes naturally occurring sugars plus any added sugars. Added Sugars is a regulated subset. The FDA’s Added Sugars page explains the distinction and the meaning of the word “Includes.”
The World Health Organization uses the term free sugars for a different public-health category. WHO’s healthy diet guidance includes sugars added by manufacturers, cooks, or consumers and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates within free sugars. FDA Added Sugars and WHO free sugars therefore should not be treated as interchangeable labels.
A U.S. ingredient list cannot generally be used to calculate WHO free sugars exactly. It can identify relevant ingredients, but it does not supply the quantities needed for a precise reconstruction.
For the terminology boundary, see Free Sugars: What the Term Means and How It Differs From Added Sugar and Free Sugar vs Added Sugar: WHO and FDA Definitions Explained.
What “No Added Sugar” Changes — and What It Does Not
A “no added sugar” claim is not the same as an empty ingredient list, zero Total Sugars, or “sugar-free.” A food can contain naturally occurring sugars while meeting conditions for a no-added-sugar claim. That claim should be interpreted according to its regulatory meaning rather than as a general statement that the product contains no sugar.
For the dedicated claim analysis, see No Added Sugar: What the Label Means and What It Can Still Contain.
Consumer Psychology: Why Ingredient Lists Are Easy to Misread
Position becomes a shortcut
Because ingredient lists are ordered, readers naturally use position as a shortcut: first feels like “a lot,” last feels like “a little.” This shortcut is directionally useful for the single ingredient being considered, but it becomes unreliable when people convert rank into imagined percentages or try to mentally aggregate several differently named sweeteners.
The cognitive task becomes harder as the list grows longer, includes sub-ingredients, uses unfamiliar terms, or mixes sugars with other sweeteners. A large analysis of U.S. product ingredient lists found substantial variation in readability and argued that ingredient lists remain comparatively understudied as a communication tool. See the peer-reviewed analysis by
When the reader’s question is where added sugars commonly appear in everyday foods rather than how ingredient order works, see Hidden Sugar: Where Added Sugars Appear in Everyday Foods.
Numbers do not automatically produce understanding
Even a quantified label can be misunderstood. In a randomized experiment of 2,509 U.S. adults, Khandpur, Graham, and Roberto found that added-sugar understanding changed with how the information was presented; interpretive text and % Daily Value improved some comprehension outcomes compared with grams alone.
A later randomized experiment by Khandpur, Rimm, and Moran found that the updated Nutrition Facts label improved consumers’ ability to locate and understand added-sugar information, while also showing that a clearer single nutrient can produce unintended product inferences. Another study comparing original and updated labels found persistent difficulty with total-versus-added-sugar questions; see Kim and colleagues.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of sugar-label formats likewise concluded that interpretive formats can improve understanding and influence lower-sugar choices more than numeric information alone in experimental settings. See Scapin and colleagues.
Health halos can compete with the ingredient list
Packaging creates expectations before a reader reaches the ingredient list. Words and cues such as natural, organic, raw, plant-based, premium, artisan, or “no added sugar” can shape perceived healthfulness, quality, and even appropriate portion size. These cues do not replace the underlying composition.
For the dedicated consumer-psychology analysis of those claims, see The Sugar Health Halo: Natural, Raw, Organic, and No Added Sugar Claims.
A systematic review of nutrition claims related to fat, sugar, and energy found that claims can change perceived healthfulness, expected taste, purchase intentions, and portion judgments; effects varied by claim and product. See Oostenbach and colleagues. An experiment on organic labeling also found an organic health-halo effect in judgments of products that differed in sugar and fat information; see Richetin and colleagues.
For ingredient-list reading, the practical implication is straightforward: read the quantified information before letting front-of-package language settle the conclusion. A claim may be accurate within its legal scope while still encouraging a broader impression that the claim itself does not establish.
Serving size can act as an anchor
The first number a consumer sees can become a reference point. When sugar is presented per serving, the serving unit anchors the quantity. If the actual portion differs from that unit, a second calculation is needed. This is a small arithmetic task, but real-world shopping adds time pressure, competing package claims, price, familiarity, and taste expectations.
The serving-size scoping review found repeated misunderstanding of serving-size meaning, while the broader label literature shows that increasing interpretive complexity can reduce accuracy. The evidence supports treating serving size as a reading aid that still requires context rather than assuming consumers automatically translate it into actual intake.
What the Evidence Supports — and What It Does Not
Established regulatory facts
In the United States, ingredients are generally declared by common or usual name in descending order of predominance by weight; qualifying low-level ingredients can use the 2%-or-less exception; compound ingredients can have declared sub-ingredients; Nutrition Facts values are generally based on a labeled serving; serving size reflects typical consumption rather than a recommended amount; and Added Sugars is included within Total Sugars.
Well-supported consumer-psychology findings
Consumers can misinterpret nutrition labels even when the underlying information is accurate. Label format affects comprehension. Serving size can be misunderstood as a recommendation. Nutrition and health claims can create broader healthfulness impressions. Ingredient-list readability is variable. These are evidence-based reasons to use a structured reading method rather than relying on a single cue.
Claims that should be treated carefully
Ingredient position does not reveal an exact percentage unless a percentage is actually provided. The ingredient list alone does not quantify total added sugar. Multiple sweeteners appearing separately do not prove deceptive intent. A natural, organic, raw, or familiar-sounding sweetener name does not establish that the final product is nutritionally superior. And serving-size information does not prescribe how much an individual should eat.
A Reliable 30-Second Method for Reading Sugar on a Package
Step 1: Read the serving information first
Find serving size and servings per container. Decide whether the portion you expect to eat or drink is one labeled serving, part of one, or multiple servings. This gives every nutrition number its denominator.
Step 2: Read Total Sugars and Added Sugars
Use the Nutrition Facts panel for grams. Remember that Added Sugars is contained within Total Sugars. Do not add the two lines together.
Step 3: Scan the ingredient list from the beginning
Look for sugar and sweetening ingredients, including names other than the word “sugar.” Notice whether a sugar source appears very early, later, inside a compound ingredient, or in a 2%-or-less group.
Step 4: Combine rank with quantity
Use rank to understand formulation and the Nutrition Facts panel to understand quantity per serving. If several sweeteners appear, do not try to infer their combined grams from their positions; use Added Sugars.
Step 5: Interpret claims last
After reading the factual panels, return to claims such as organic, natural, raw, reduced sugar, sugar-free, or no added sugar. Ask what the claim specifically says and avoid extending it into a broader conclusion that the claim does not establish.
Common Mistakes When Reading Sugar Ingredient Lists
Mistake: Looking only for the word “sugar”
Why it fails: added sugars can appear as syrups, honey, dextrose, glucose, fructose, molasses, and other ingredient names. Better approach: recognize the category, then verify Added Sugars on Nutrition Facts.
Mistake: Assuming a low-ranked sweetener means the whole product is low in added sugar
Why it fails: there may be several sweetening ingredients, the list does not give exact percentages, and serving size controls the quantitative label. Better approach: use rank as context, not as the measurement.
Mistake: Adding Total Sugars and Added Sugars
Why it fails: Added Sugars is a subset of Total Sugars. Better approach: read the “Includes” wording literally.
Mistake: Ignoring the number of servings
Why it fails: the printed sugar grams usually describe one serving. Better approach: scale the numbers to the amount actually consumed when it differs from the labeled serving.
Mistake: Treating serving size as a recommendation
Why it fails: FDA serving sizes are designed around typical consumption amounts. Better approach: use serving size as the reference quantity for interpreting the label.
Mistake: Letting a health-oriented claim replace the ingredient list
Why it fails: a claim has a specific scope, while consumers often generalize it into an overall health judgment. Better approach: read the factual panels first and the marketing or claim language second.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the first ingredient always the largest ingredient?
For ordinary U.S. food ingredient declarations, ingredients are generally listed in descending order of predominance by weight, so the first declared ingredient is the predominant ingredient by weight. There are specific exceptions and special declaration rules, including the 2%-or-less provision and rules for compound ingredients. See 21 CFR § 101.4.
Does sugar near the end of an ingredient list mean the food is low in sugar?
Not necessarily. A late position means that particular sugar ingredient weighs less than the ingredients before it under the applicable listing rules. Other sugar sources may also be present, and the list does not quantify their combined grams. Check Total Sugars and Added Sugars.
Can a product contain more than one kind of added sugar?
Yes. Different sweetening ingredients can appear in the same product. They may be used for different sensory and technical functions and are declared separately when they are separate ingredients.
Can I calculate grams of sugar from the ingredient order?
Usually no. Order gives relative predominance, not exact quantity. The Nutrition Facts panel is the source for grams of Total Sugars and Added Sugars per labeled serving.
Why can a sweetener appear inside parentheses?
Because a compound ingredient can have its own sub-ingredients. U.S. rules permit specified declaration formats for these components, so reading parenthetical lists matters.
Does serving size change the ingredient list order?
No. Serving size changes the reference quantity for the Nutrition Facts numbers, not the recipe. Ingredient order describes the product’s formulation, while nutrition amounts are generally expressed for the labeled serving.
If I eat two servings, do I double the sugar numbers?
Yes, for a straightforward two-serving amount, you double the per-serving nutrient quantities. FDA gives the same logic in its serving-size guidance.
Is honey an added sugar?
Under FDA’s Added Sugars framework, sugars from honey are included in added sugars, with special presentation rules for single-ingredient sugars and syrups. See FDA Added Sugars guidance.
Is fruit juice concentrate always an added sugar?
FDA’s definition has specific rules and exceptions for concentrated fruit or vegetable juices, including whether the sugars exceed what would be expected from the same volume of 100% juice of the same type. The ingredient name alone is therefore not enough to reconstruct every regulatory calculation.
Is “no added sugar” the same as “sugar-free”?
No. They are different claims with different meanings. A product with no added sugar may still contain naturally occurring sugars. See No Added Sugar: What the Label Means and What It Can Still Contain.
Does an organic or natural sugar name mean the product is healthier?
The name can describe source, production, certification, or marketing position, but it does not by itself establish overall nutritional superiority. Consumer studies show that organic and nutrition-oriented claims can create health halos, which is why the ingredient list and Nutrition Facts panel should still be read directly.
Can ingredient lists tell me about blood glucose?
Ingredient lists describe food composition; they are not blood-glucose measurements and they do not provide individualized glucose targets, A1C interpretation, continuous-glucose-monitor guidance, or diabetes-management instructions. Those medical questions belong to a different evidence and clinical context.
The Practical Meaning
A sugar ingredient list becomes much easier to read once three separate ideas are kept separate: order tells relative weight, names tell ingredient identity, and serving size tells what quantity the Nutrition Facts numbers describe. Confusion begins when one of those signals is asked to do the job of the others.
If sugar appears near the top, that is meaningful evidence that the particular sweetening ingredient is a substantial component by weight. If several sweeteners appear, that is meaningful evidence that the formula contains several sugar sources. If the serving is small, that is meaningful context for the grams displayed. None of these observations alone replaces the Added Sugars number.
The strongest reading method is therefore integrative: identify the ingredients, respect the order, inspect sub-ingredients, quantify sugar from Nutrition Facts, scale the amount to the relevant number of servings, and interpret front-of-package claims only after the factual panels have been understood.
Related Articles
References
Cooper, K., Gasper, W., Flores, R., Clarke, M., Bass, E., Evans, L., & Ponce, J. (2022). Exploring the Readability of Ingredients Lists of Food Labels with Existing Metrics. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, 2022, 159–167. PubMed
Food and Drug Administration. Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label. FDA
Food and Drug Administration. Serving Size on the Nutrition Facts Label. FDA
Food and Drug Administration. Types of Food Ingredients. FDA
Khandpur, N., Graham, D. J., & Roberto, C. A. (2017). Simplifying mental math: Changing how added sugars are displayed on the nutrition facts label can improve consumer understanding. Appetite, 114, 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.015. PubMed
Khandpur, N., Rimm, E. B., & Moran, A. J. (2020). The Influence of the New US Nutrition Facts Label on Consumer Perceptions and Understanding of Added Sugars: A Randomized Controlled Experiment. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 120(2), 197–209. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2019.10.008. PubMed
Kim, E. J., Ellison, B., Prescott, M. P., & Nayga, R. M., Jr. (2021). Consumer Comprehension of the Nutrition Facts Label: A Comparison of the Original and Updated Labels. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(5), 648–657. doi:10.1177/0890117120983128. PubMed
Oostenbach, L. H., Slits, E., Robinson, E., & Sacks, G. (2019). Systematic review of the impact of nutrition claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake. BMC Public Health, 19, 1296. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7622-3. PubMed
Richetin, J., Caputo, V., Demartini, E., Conner, M., & Perugini, M. (2022). Organic food labels bias food healthiness perceptions: Estimating healthiness equivalence using a Discrete Choice Experiment. Appetite, 172, 105970. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2022.105970. PubMed
Scapin, T., Fernandes, A. C., Curioni, C. C., Pettigrew, S., Neal, B., Coyle, D. H., Rodrigues, V. M., Bernardo, G. L., Uggioni, P. L., & Proença, R. P. C. (2021). Influence of sugar label formats on consumer understanding and amount of sugar in food choices: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Nutrition Reviews, 79(7), 788–801. doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuaa108. PubMed
U.S. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR § 101.4 — Food; designation of ingredients. eCFR
U.S. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. 21 CFR § 101.9 — Nutrition labeling of food. eCFR
Van der Horst, K., Bucher, T., Duncanson, K., Murawski, B., & Labbe, D. (2019). Consumer Understanding, Perception and Interpretation of Serving Size Information on Food Labels: A Scoping Review. Nutrients, 11(9), 2189. doi:10.3390/nu11092189. PubMed
World Health Organization. Healthy diet. WHO