Sugar Calories: How Many Calories Are in Sugar?
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Sugar provides about 4 Calories per gram. For ordinary granulated table sugar, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Standard Reference entry for “Sugars, granulated” lists 387 Calories per 100 grams, 16 Calories in a 4.2-gram teaspoon, and 773 Calories in a 200-gram cup. The small difference between the familiar “4 Calories per gram” rule and 387 Calories per 100 grams comes from the difference between a rounded regulatory energy factor and the more specific food-composition factor used for sucrose.
That gives a practical answer immediately: one level teaspoon of granulated sugar is about 16 Calories; one tablespoon, which is three teaspoons, is about 48 Calories; 10 grams is about 39 Calories; 25 grams is about 97 Calories; 50 grams is about 194 Calories; and 100 grams is 387 Calories in the USDA reference. For quick label arithmetic, multiplying grams of traditional sugar by 4 is usually close enough.
The exact number you see on a package can differ slightly because serving weights, rounding rules, moisture, formulation, and the particular sugar or sweetener matter. “Sugar” is also used casually for several different things: granulated sucrose, sugars naturally present in foods, added sugars on a U.S. Nutrition Facts label, free sugars in World Health Organization guidance, and sometimes even sugar substitutes. Those categories should not be treated as interchangeable.
For the broader taxonomy and everyday meanings of sugar, see Sugar: What It Is, Types, Uses, Health, and Psychology. For the relationship between sugar and the larger carbohydrate category, see Sugar vs Carbohydrates: What Is the Difference?.
Sugar calories: the quick answer
For plain granulated sucrose, the most useful reference values are straightforward. USDA Standard Reference Release 28 lists granulated sugar (NDB No. 19335) at 387 Calories per 100 grams, with a common-measure value of 16 Calories for one 4.2-gram teaspoon and 773 Calories for one 200-gram cup.
1 gram of granulated sugar: about 3.9 Calories in the USDA reference, or about 4 Calories for quick label math.
1 teaspoon (4.2 g): 16 Calories.
1 tablespoon (about 12.6 g, or 3 teaspoons): about 48 Calories.
1 small sugar packet (USDA common measure, 2.8 g): about 11 Calories.
10 g: about 39 Calories using the USDA 387-Calorie-per-100-g reference.
25 g: about 97 Calories.
50 g: about 194 Calories.
100 g: 387 Calories.
1 cup of granulated sugar (USDA common measure, 200 g): 773 Calories.
These are reference values for granulated sucrose. A kitchen spoon that is heaped rather than level, a tightly packed brown sugar measure, a powdered sugar cup, or a liquid sweetener can contain a different mass in the same apparent volume. When accuracy matters, grams are more reliable than spoonfuls or cups.
Why do some sources say sugar has 4 Calories per gram while USDA lists 387 per 100 grams?
Both figures can be correct in context. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration explains that traditional sugars are generally assigned 4 Calories per gram for calorie calculation. That is the familiar general factor used for carbohydrate on food labels and in everyday nutrition arithmetic.
The USDA Standard Reference entry for granulated sucrose uses a carbohydrate calorie factor of 3.87 and reports 387 Calories per 100 grams. This is why a database can say 387 Calories per 100 grams while a simple “grams × 4” calculation gives 400. The difference is not evidence that one source has made a basic arithmetic error; the two numbers come from different levels of precision and different calculation conventions.
For ordinary use, the distinction is small. If you are reading a packaged-food label, use the number printed on that label. If you are estimating the energy contributed by a measured amount of traditional sugar, 4 Calories per gram is a practical rule. If you are comparing food-composition records, preserve the source’s stated value rather than forcing every record to exactly 4 Calories per gram.
How many calories are in a teaspoon of sugar?
A level teaspoon of granulated sugar is about 16 Calories in the USDA reference because the reference teaspoon weighs 4.2 grams. In real kitchens, a teaspoon can weigh somewhat more or less depending on whether it is level, rounded, heaped, damp, compacted, or measured with ordinary cutlery instead of a standardized measuring spoon.
This is why “one teaspoon” is useful for everyday communication but grams are better for precision. Four teaspoons measured loosely and four teaspoons heaped above the rim are not the same quantity even though both can be described informally as “four spoons of sugar.”
The same arithmetic explains sugar added to drinks. One level teaspoon of granulated sugar contributes about 16 Calories to tea or coffee; two teaspoons contribute about 32; three about 48. Those figures describe the sugar only. Milk, cream, syrups, juice, alcohol, or other ingredients add their own energy.
How many calories are in a tablespoon of sugar?
One U.S. tablespoon equals three teaspoons. Using the USDA teaspoon reference, three level teaspoons of granulated sugar weigh about 12.6 grams and contribute about 48 Calories. A tablespoon that is rounded or heaped can hold more.
This is a good example of why a visually small serving can still be energy-dense. Granulated sugar contains almost no water and is almost entirely carbohydrate by weight, so a modest spoonful contains much more energy than the same visual volume of a water-rich food.
How many calories are in a cup of sugar?
USDA Standard Reference lists one cup of granulated sugar as 200 grams and 773 Calories. Half a cup at that reference weight is about 100 grams and 387 Calories; one quarter cup is about 50 grams and roughly 194 Calories.
Cup measurements are especially sensitive to the ingredient. Granulated sugar, powdered sugar, loosely spooned brown sugar, packed brown sugar, and coarse raw crystals do not necessarily place the same mass into the same cup. A recipe that gives grams is therefore easier to convert accurately than a recipe that gives only volume.
How to calculate calories from grams of sugar
For a quick estimate of the calories contributed by traditional sugars, multiply grams by 4. Ten grams is about 40 Calories, 20 grams about 80, 30 grams about 120, and 50 grams about 200. This is the most useful mental-math rule when a Nutrition Facts label gives grams of sugar.
For granulated sucrose specifically, a USDA-based estimate can use 3.87 Calories per gram instead. Ten grams then works out to about 39 Calories, 25 grams to about 97, and 50 grams to about 194. The practical difference between the two methods is small at ordinary serving sizes.
There is one important limit to this calculation: grams of sugar do not tell you the total calories in a food. A product can also contain starch, fiber, protein, fat, alcohol, sugar alcohols, or other energy-yielding ingredients. The FDA’s Calories on the Nutrition Facts Label page explains that the calorie number on the label represents energy from all relevant sources in the serving, not sugar alone.
Sugar calories versus total calories in a food
For the broader label-level breakdown of Calories, Total Carbohydrate, Total Sugars, and Added Sugars, see Sugar Nutrition Facts: Calories, Carbohydrates, and Added Sugars.
If a yogurt lists 15 grams of Total Sugars, it is incorrect to assume the yogurt contains only about 60 Calories. Those 15 grams may account for roughly 60 Calories of energy from sugars, but the yogurt can also contain protein, fat, other carbohydrate, and additional ingredients. The label’s Calories line is the better source for the total energy in the serving.
The reverse misunderstanding also occurs. If a food has 200 Calories, those 200 Calories are not automatically “200 calories of sugar.” The total calorie figure aggregates energy across the food. To understand how much sugar is present, read the Total Sugars and Added Sugars lines separately from Calories.
The FDA also emphasizes that all Nutrition Facts values refer to the labeled serving size. Its serving-size guidance notes that serving size is not a recommendation of how much to eat; it is the basis for the nutrition information. If you consume two labeled servings, you generally double the listed calories and nutrient amounts.
Total sugar, added sugar, free sugars, and naturally occurring sugars are different categories
The calorie question becomes confusing when several sugar terms are treated as synonyms. In U.S. labeling, Total Sugars and Added Sugars have specific meanings. The FDA states that Total Sugars include sugars naturally present in foods and beverages plus any added sugars in the product. Added Sugars are a subset of Total Sugars, not an extra quantity to add on top.
The FDA’s Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label page defines Added Sugars to include sugars added during processing, foods packaged as sweeteners such as table sugar, sugars from syrups and honey, and sugars from concentrated fruit or vegetable juices under the agency’s rules. Naturally occurring sugars in milk, fruits, and vegetables are not counted as Added Sugars.
The World Health Organization uses the broader term free sugars for public-health guidance. WHO’s definition includes sugars added by manufacturers, cooks, or consumers and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates. That means WHO free sugars and FDA Added Sugars overlap substantially but are not identical regulatory categories.
These distinctions describe source and classification, not a magical change in the energy of the same sugar molecule. A gram of sucrose does not become calorie-free because it occurs in one context rather than another. What changes across foods is the whole nutritional package: water, fiber, protein, fat, micronutrients, portion size, food structure, and the other ingredients eaten with the sugar.
Do naturally occurring sugars have calories?
Yes. Naturally occurring sugars contribute energy. The phrase “natural sugar” is often used to describe sugars that occur intrinsically in foods such as fruit or milk, but it does not mean “zero calorie.” The calories in the whole food, however, cannot be inferred from sugar grams alone.
A piece of fruit contains water, fiber, micronutrients, organic acids, aroma compounds, and a mixture of carbohydrates. Milk contains protein, fat in many products, minerals, and lactose. Comparing either food with a spoonful of purified sucrose purely on the basis of “grams of sugar” strips away those differences. Calorie arithmetic is useful, but nutritional equivalence is a separate question.
Does added sugar have more calories than naturally occurring sugar?
Not simply because it is “added.” Added Sugar is a labeling category. If the same chemical sugar is present in the same mass, its energy contribution does not increase merely because a manufacturer or cook added it. What differs is where the sugar comes from and what else is in the food.
This is why the U.S. Nutrition Facts label can show both Total Sugars and “Includes X g Added Sugars.” The included added-sugar grams are already part of Total Sugars. Adding the two numbers together would double-count the added portion.
Do white, cane, brown, raw, and organic sugars have different calories?
For ordinary culinary sugars that are mostly sucrose, calorie differences by weight are generally small. Color, crystal size, trace molasses, processing method, source plant, organic certification, and marketing language can make products look very different while their energy density remains broadly similar.
By volume, differences can be more noticeable because one cup or spoon can contain different weights. Brown sugar may be packed; powdered sugar contains much smaller particles and often a small amount of starch; coarse crystals leave different air spaces; moisture also changes mass and composition. A fair calorie comparison therefore uses equal weights, not merely equal-looking spoonfuls.
The exact questions “cane sugar versus white sugar,” “brown sugar versus white sugar,” and whether one type is healthier are separate search intents because they involve processing, composition, taste, baking behavior, labeling, and health claims beyond calorie count. For this article, the core point is narrower: the name or color of a conventional sucrose-rich sugar does not create a large calorie advantage by itself.
Sucrose, glucose, and fructose: does the specific sugar change the calorie answer?
Table sugar is sucrose, a disaccharide composed of glucose and fructose units. Glucose and fructose are monosaccharides. In ordinary nutrition labeling, traditional digestible sugars are treated as carbohydrate and are commonly estimated at about 4 Calories per gram.
That does not mean glucose, fructose, and sucrose are biologically identical in every respect. Their digestion and metabolism differ in important ways. It means only that the broad calorie estimate is similar enough that “about 4 Calories per gram” is the appropriate everyday energy rule for traditional sugars. Detailed metabolic comparisons belong to a different question from the simple calorie count.
Allulose, sugar alcohols, and non-sugar sweeteners are exceptions to the simple rule
The rule “sugar equals 4 Calories per gram” should not be applied blindly to every sweet-tasting ingredient. The FDA explicitly distinguishes traditional sugars from sugars that are metabolized differently, sugar alcohols, and high-intensity sweeteners.
Allulose is a useful example. The FDA allows manufacturers to use 0.4 Calories per gram for allulose instead of 4 Calories per gram for calorie calculation. Allulose also receives different treatment on the Total Sugars and Added Sugars lines.
Sugar alcohols such as erythritol, xylitol, sorbitol, maltitol, mannitol, and others form another separate class. High-intensity sweeteners such as aspartame are not chemically sugars at all. Stevia-derived sweeteners and monk fruit sweeteners are likewise discussed as sugar substitutes rather than ordinary dietary sugars. Their calories, sweetness potency, gastrointestinal effects, and labeling rules cannot be inferred from the sucrose value.
So if a package says “sweetened,” “sugar free,” or “reduced sugar,” the word alone does not reveal the product’s calorie content. The FDA specifically notes that “no added sugars” does not mean “calorie-free.” Read the full Nutrition Facts label and ingredient list.
Why sugar calories are easy to misjudge
Sugar is visually compact, and people rarely experience grams directly. We see a spoon, a packet, a swirl from a dispenser, a sweetened drink, or a serving on a label. That creates several opportunities for estimation error: the spoon may not be level, the portion may be larger than assumed, a restaurant serving may exceed a household serving, and the package can contain multiple labeled servings.
A systematic review of portion-size estimation methods found that under- or overestimating portions is a recognized source of dietary assessment error. The implication for sugar is practical rather than psychological diagnosis: if the weight estimate is wrong, the calorie estimate will be wrong even when the calorie formula is correct.
Portion size also matters behaviorally. A 2024 USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review concluded that portion size and energy intake are meaningfully related across the evidence base. This does not mean that a spoon of sugar causes a particular behavior. It means that the amount made available or selected is part of the energy-intake problem, so serving context belongs beside the calorie number.
The psychology of calorie perception: numbers, labels, and health halos
A calorie value looks objective because it is a number, but people do not interpret food numbers in a vacuum. Packaging, health claims, serving-size framing, ingredient names, color, provenance, and expectations can influence what the number seems to mean.
A systematic review of nutrition claims related to fat, sugar, and energy found that such claims can change perceived healthfulness and perceived appropriate portion size, and in some studies can lead to underestimation of a product’s energy content. The review also found heterogeneous effects on actual food choice and intake. That distinction matters: a “health halo” is evidence about perception and judgment, not proof that every consumer will eat more.
Sugar labels have their own evidence base. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies found that interpretive sugar labels, warning signs, health warnings, and graphical depictions could improve understanding or shift choices toward products with less sugar more consistently than bare numerical information in the included comparisons. In other words, many people understand a number better when the information is translated into a meaningful frame.
This helps explain why “16 Calories in a teaspoon” can be more cognitively useful than “387 Calories per 100 grams” for someone sweetening a drink, while the per-100-gram figure is more useful for comparing products by weight. Neither representation is intrinsically more truthful; each answers a different practical question.
Does “raw,” “natural,” or “organic” sugar mean fewer calories?
Those words can change expectations more than they change the energy of a sucrose-rich product. Consumer research has repeatedly documented health-halo effects in which positive production or nutrition cues influence perceived healthfulness and sometimes calorie estimates. The safest way to compare two sugars is therefore to ignore the halo and compare the actual grams and calories on the label.
The broader evidence does not justify assuming that every “natural” or “organic” claim causes calorie underestimation in every setting. The effect depends on the food, claim, consumer, and context. What is well supported is the general principle that front-of-package cues and nutrition claims can shape health judgments independently of the product’s measured energy.
For sugar specifically, visual signals such as golden color, large crystals, “raw” wording, geographic provenance, or craft packaging may imply wholesomeness, authenticity, or lesser processing. Those meanings can be culturally and psychologically real while remaining separate from the calorie calculation.
Sugar in tea and other drinks: a simple real-world example
Suppose unsweetened tea contributes essentially no sugar calories and you add two level teaspoons of granulated sugar. Using the USDA teaspoon reference, the sugar adds about 32 Calories. Add four teaspoons, and the sugar contributes about 64 Calories. The arithmetic is linear because twice the mass of the same sugar contributes about twice the energy.
The drink can still contain more calories than the sugar calculation if it also contains milk, cream, lemonade, syrup, or another ingredient. Conversely, a sweet-tasting drink made with a low- or noncaloric sweetener may taste very sweet while containing little energy from the sweetener itself. Sweetness intensity and calorie content are related only imperfectly.
For a concrete English Hub example of a beverage where recipe, serving size, and sweetness all matter, see Sweet Tea: What It Is, Sugar, Caffeine, Culture, and Taste. Its sugar content varies by recipe and serving, which is exactly why measuring grams or reading the label is more reliable than guessing from sweetness alone.
Calories are one dimension of sugar, not a complete health verdict
A calorie is a unit of food energy. Knowing the energy in sugar is useful for recipe calculations, label reading, portion comparisons, and understanding how sweeteners contribute to total energy intake. It does not, by itself, tell you whether a food is nutritious, filling, culturally meaningful, appropriate for a particular meal, or suitable for an individual medical condition.
Public-health guidance therefore discusses more than calories. WHO’s sugar guideline addresses free-sugar intake in relation to diet quality, unhealthy weight gain, and dental caries, while U.S. labeling separately identifies Added Sugars. Those are questions about dietary patterns and health, not corrections to the basic calorie value of sugar.
This article intentionally stops at that boundary. Blood-glucose readings, fasting glucose, glucose targets, A1C, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, continuous glucose monitoring, diabetes medication, and personalized glucose management are medical topics and are not interchangeable with the everyday question “How many calories are in sugar?”
What the evidence establishes, and what remains context-dependent
Established
Traditional sugars are commonly calculated at about 4 Calories per gram for U.S. labeling purposes. USDA Standard Reference lists granulated sucrose at 387 Calories per 100 grams, 16 Calories per 4.2-gram teaspoon, and 773 Calories per 200-gram cup. Added Sugars and Total Sugars are distinct U.S. label categories, with Added Sugars included within Total Sugars rather than added to it again.
Established with an important exception
Not every sweet-tasting ingredient follows the 4-Calorie-per-gram rule. FDA permits 0.4 Calories per gram for allulose, and sugar alcohols and high-intensity sweeteners form separate categories with different energy values and labeling treatment.
Supported but context-dependent
Serving-size framing, nutrition claims, and label format can influence how people understand sugar and energy information. Systematic reviews show meaningful effects on understanding and perceived healthfulness, while effects on actual portions, purchasing, and consumption vary across studies and contexts.
A common oversimplification
“Natural,” “raw,” “brown,” “cane,” or “organic” does not automatically mean substantially fewer calories. For conventional sucrose-rich sugars, compare equal weights and read the label rather than inferring calorie content from color, origin, or processing language.
Practical rules that prevent most sugar-calorie mistakes
Use grams when accuracy matters. A scale removes much of the uncertainty created by heaped spoons, packed cups, and different crystal sizes.
Use “grams × 4” as quick mental math for traditional sugars, then use the product label when you need the product’s official value.
Do not add Total Sugars and Added Sugars together. Added Sugars are already included in Total Sugars on the U.S. Nutrition Facts label.
Do not treat grams of sugar as the total calories in a mixed food. Read the Calories line for the serving.
Do not assume a sugar substitute has the same calories as sucrose. Identify the actual sweetener.
Do not assume “natural,” “raw,” “organic,” “no added sugars,” or “sugar free” tells you the total calorie count. Marketing and regulatory terms answer different questions from total energy.
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in 1 gram of sugar?
About 4 Calories is the practical rule for traditional sugars. USDA’s specific granulated-sucrose entry works out to 3.87 Calories per gram.
How many calories are in 1 teaspoon of sugar?
About 16 Calories for a level teaspoon of granulated sugar. USDA lists the teaspoon at 4.2 grams.
How many calories are in 1 tablespoon of sugar?
About 48 Calories for three level teaspoons, or roughly 12.6 grams, using the USDA teaspoon reference.
How many calories are in 10 grams of sugar?
About 39 Calories using USDA’s 387 Calories per 100 grams, or about 40 Calories using the quick 4-Calorie-per-gram rule.
How many calories are in 25 grams of sugar?
About 97 Calories using the USDA granulated-sugar reference, or about 100 Calories using quick label math.
How many calories are in 50 grams of sugar?
About 194 Calories using the USDA reference, or about 200 Calories using the rounded 4-Calorie-per-gram rule.
How many calories are in 100 grams of sugar?
USDA Standard Reference lists granulated sugar at 387 Calories per 100 grams.
How many calories are in a cup of sugar?
USDA lists one cup of granulated sugar as 200 grams and 773 Calories. Different sugar forms can pack differently, so the number for a cup of brown, powdered, or coarse sugar can differ.
Does brown sugar have fewer calories than white sugar?
Any difference is small when equal weights of ordinary sucrose-rich sugars are compared. Volume measurements can diverge because packing and moisture change how many grams fit into a spoon or cup.
Does cane sugar have fewer calories than regular sugar?
Not by a meaningful amount merely because it is labeled cane sugar. Compare the actual Nutrition Facts values per equal weight or serving.
Does raw sugar have fewer calories?
The “raw” description does not create a major calorie advantage. Crystal size and serving weight can change calories per spoon, but the energy per gram remains broadly similar for sucrose-rich sugars.
Do fruit sugars have calories?
Yes. Sugars naturally occurring in fruit contribute energy. Whole fruit, however, also contains water, fiber, micronutrients, and other compounds, so its nutritional meaning cannot be reduced to the calorie value of isolated sugar.
Are Added Sugars extra calories on top of Total Sugars?
No. On the U.S. Nutrition Facts label, Added Sugars are included within Total Sugars. The Added Sugars line tells you how much of the total falls into the FDA’s added-sugar category.
Does “sugar free” mean calorie-free?
No. A sugar-free product can contain calories from fat, starch, protein, sugar alcohols, or other ingredients. Read the Calories line and the ingredient list rather than inferring total energy from a sugar claim.
Is allulose 4 Calories per gram?
No. FDA permits a caloric value of 0.4 Calories per gram for allulose, which is one reason all sweeteners should not be treated as ordinary sucrose.
How many calories does one teaspoon of sugar add to coffee or tea?
About 16 Calories for the sugar itself. The total drink calories depend on everything else in the cup.
Is 4 Calories per gram exact?
It is a standard practical and regulatory value for traditional sugars, not a claim that every food-composition database must display exactly 400 Calories per 100 grams. USDA’s granulated-sucrose record is 387 Calories per 100 grams.
Calories explain the energy in sugar, but they do not by themselves define a daily sugar guideline. For current U.S., FDA, WHO, and AHA intake frameworks, see How Much Sugar Per Day? Guidelines, Labels, and Practical Context.
Related Articles
Sweet Tea: What It Is, Sugar, Caffeine, Culture, and Taste — a real-world example of why recipe and serving size matter when estimating sugar calories.
Iced Tea vs Sweet Tea: Sugar, Brewing, Caffeine, and Regional Style — how added sugar changes the nutrition and sensory profile of a familiar beverage.
Arnold Palmer Drink: Tea, Lemonade, Caffeine, Sugar, and Taste — a mixed-drink example where total calories depend on both sugar and the rest of the formulation.
Sugar: What It Is, Types, Uses, Health, and Psychology — the broad Sugar Psychology & Sugar Knowledge guide and branch pillar.
Sugar Nutrition Facts: Calories, Carbohydrates, and Added Sugars — the full nutrition-label guide to calories, carbohydrate, Total Sugars, Added Sugars, serving size, and % Daily Value.
References
Amoutzopoulos, B., et al. (2020). Portion size estimation in dietary assessment: a systematic review of existing tools, their strengths and limitations. Nutrition Reviews, 78(11), 885–900. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuz107.
Andres, A., et al. (2024). Portion Size and Energy Intake: A Systematic Review. USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review. DOI: 10.52570/NESR.DGAC2025.SR28.
Brown, H. M., Rollo, M. E., de Vlieger, N. M., Collins, C. E., & Bucher, T. (2018). Influence of the nutrition and health information presented on food labels on portion size consumed: a systematic review. Nutrition Reviews, 76(9), 655–677. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy019.
Food and Drug Administration. (2026). Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Food and Drug Administration. (2025). Calories on the Nutrition Facts Label. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Sugars That Are Metabolized Differently Than Traditional Sugars. U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Oostenbach, L. H., Slits, E., Robinson, E., & Sacks, G. (2019). Systematic review of the impact of nutrition claims related to fat, sugar and energy content on food choices and energy intake. BMC Public Health, 19, 1296. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7622-3.
Scapin, T., et al. (2021). Influence of sugar label formats on consumer understanding and amount of sugar in food choices: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Nutrition Reviews, 79(7), 788–801. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa108.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. (2015). USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 28: Sugars, granulated (NDB No. 19335).
World Health Organization. (2015). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization.