Sugar and Cholesterol: What Research Shows
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Sugar can affect blood lipids, but the popular sentence “sugar raises cholesterol” compresses several different questions into one. Cholesterol is carried in different lipoproteins, triglycerides are a separate type of blood fat, and studies of sugar differ in whether they examine added sugars, free sugars, sucrose, fructose, sugar-sweetened beverages, or total dietary patterns. The result is a real relationship that is easy to oversimplify.
The clearest human evidence is that high intakes of added or free sugars can worsen parts of the lipid profile, with triglycerides showing the most consistent signal. Effects on LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol are smaller and more variable. A 2022 Cochrane review of randomized trials found that lower added-sugar diets produced only small average improvements in total cholesterol and triglycerides and no clear effect on LDL or HDL; the certainty of evidence was low. Earlier randomized-trial meta-analyses found adverse lipid changes under some higher-sugar conditions, while also showing substantial heterogeneity and sensitivity to study design.
This matters because “cholesterol” is not one dietary target. If the question is specifically how to lower LDL cholesterol, current heart-health guidance still places major emphasis on replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat, while also minimizing foods and drinks high in added sugars as part of an overall heart-healthy pattern. The American Heart Association’s 2026 dietary guidance makes both points.
This article explains what research shows about sugar, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, fructose, food source, and practical diet choices. It does not turn dietary sugar into advice about blood-glucose targets, A1C, continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, or individualized diabetes treatment.
Quick Answer: Does Sugar Raise Cholesterol?
High intakes of added or free sugars can contribute to an unfavorable blood-lipid pattern, especially higher triglycerides. Some controlled trials also show increases in LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol, but those effects are less consistent. Observational studies often find that people consuming more added sugar or sugar-sweetened beverages have higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol, yet observational associations cannot by themselves prove that sugar caused the difference.
A useful summary is: sugar can matter for cholesterol-related risk, but it does not act like a single switch that raises every lipid value. The size and direction of the effect depend on total energy intake, the dose and form of sugar, the carbohydrate or fat it replaces, body-weight change, the duration of exposure, and individual metabolism. The broader Is Sugar Bad for You? article explains why source, amount, and dietary context matter across health outcomes.
For many people, the most actionable distinction is between a diet that contains some sugar within an otherwise nutrient-dense pattern and a pattern that repeatedly delivers large amounts of added sugar through soft drinks, sweetened coffee or tea, desserts, candy, and other highly sweetened foods. The second pattern makes excess sugar and excess energy much easier to consume.
First, What Does “Cholesterol” Mean?
A lipid panel usually reports several related measures. LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides are not interchangeable. The American Heart Association’s cholesterol overview describes LDL as the major atherogenic cholesterol measure in routine public discussion, HDL as a lipoprotein marker interpreted in context, and triglycerides as the body’s most common form of stored fat.
LDL cholesterol
LDL carries cholesterol through the bloodstream. Persistently high LDL is causally involved in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. When people ask whether sugar “raises bad cholesterol,” they are usually asking about LDL. Sugar can raise LDL under some experimental conditions, but the effect is less consistent than its effect on triglycerides, and the food replacing sugar matters.
HDL cholesterol
HDL participates in cholesterol transport and is associated with cardiovascular risk, but it is not a simple score in which higher is always therapeutically better. High-sugar observational patterns are often associated with lower HDL, especially when sugar comes from sweetened beverages, but randomized intervention evidence does not show a single uniform HDL response.
Triglycerides
Triglycerides are not cholesterol. They are fats carried in the blood and stored in the body. They are included in standard lipid panels because high triglycerides can accompany an atherogenic metabolic pattern. Among lipid outcomes, triglycerides are the measure most consistently linked to high sugar intake, particularly when sugar adds excess calories.
This distinction resolves a common search confusion: a person can ask about “sugar and cholesterol” while the strongest dietary signal may actually be a rise in triglycerides rather than a dramatic rise in LDL.
What Randomized Trials Show
Randomized feeding trials are valuable because they can change sugar intake deliberately and measure the lipid response. A 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis by Te Morenga and colleagues pooled randomized trials that modified dietary free sugars. Higher-sugar diets produced average increases in triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol. The review was influential because it showed that lipid effects could be detected experimentally rather than only in observational populations.
A later 2017 systematic review by Fattore and colleagues asked a stricter question: what happens when free sugars replace complex carbohydrates without changing total energy? Across 28 studies, initial pooled estimates suggested increases in LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, but those signals weakened after adjustment for publication bias and after higher-risk studies were removed. The authors concluded that short- to moderate-term isoenergetic trials showed an unclear effect on the lipid profile.
The Cochrane review published in 2022 included 21 randomized trials with 1,110 adults and an average intervention duration of about 14 weeks. Lower added-sugar intake produced only small average reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides, with no clear evidence of an effect on LDL or HDL. No included trial reported cardiovascular events or mortality, and the review rated the evidence as low certainty.
Taken together, randomized evidence supports a measured conclusion. Added or free sugar can influence blood lipids, but the average effect is not uniform across every lipid marker. Triglycerides are the most reproducible concern; LDL effects appear under some conditions but are less stable across trial designs; HDL findings vary. Short trials also cannot tell us directly how many heart attacks or strokes would be prevented by changing sugar intake alone.
What Observational Research Shows
Observational studies examine how habitual sugar intake relates to lipid patterns and cardiovascular outcomes in everyday life. In a large U.S. analysis, Welsh and colleagues found that higher added-sugar intake was associated with progressively lower HDL cholesterol and higher triglycerides. LDL showed a positive trend in women but not in men. Because the study was cross-sectional, it identified a population pattern rather than proving that added sugar alone caused each lipid difference.
Long-term observational research also connects high added-sugar intake with cardiovascular outcomes. Yang and colleagues reported an association between a higher share of calories from added sugar and cardiovascular mortality in U.S. adults. That finding supports concern about high-sugar dietary patterns, while still leaving room for residual confounding and other aspects of diet and lifestyle.
A broad 2023 BMJ umbrella review synthesized dozens of meta-analyses across many health outcomes. It found numerous adverse associations with high sugar exposure, especially in cardiometabolic health, but also emphasized that evidence quality varied widely and that many outcomes were supported mainly by observational data. That is the right way to read the literature: the overall signal matters, and the strength of evidence differs by outcome.
Which Lipid Is Most Sensitive to Sugar?
Triglycerides: the strongest and most consistent signal
If one lipid deserves special attention in a sugar-and-cholesterol discussion, it is triglycerides. High carbohydrate intake can increase the liver’s production of triglycerides, and fructose-containing sugars can contribute to this process. The effect becomes especially evident when sugar provides excess energy rather than simply replacing another carbohydrate calorie for calorie.
A systematic review of controlled fructose feeding trials found no significant increase in post-meal triglycerides when fructose replaced other carbohydrates at the same energy level, but found a clear triglyceride-raising effect when high-dose fructose supplied excess calories. This is a crucial distinction because it shows why “fructose raises triglycerides” is incomplete without asking whether the diet was energy matched or energy excessive.
In real diets, repeated sugar-sweetened beverages are important because liquid sugar can add substantial energy quickly and with relatively little satiety. The practical concern is therefore not a single teaspoon of sucrose in isolation; it is a dietary pattern in which sweet drinks and other sugar-rich foods repeatedly increase total sugar and energy exposure.
LDL cholesterol: possible increases, but a less uniform effect
Higher sugar intake can raise LDL cholesterol in some trials, and mechanistic pathways make such an effect plausible. Yet the best synthesis is not that sugar reliably drives LDL upward in everyone. Meta-analyses differ because trials use different sugar doses, comparison diets, durations, participant characteristics, and energy conditions.
That is why the CDC’s current cholesterol-prevention guidance still emphasizes saturated and trans fats as important dietary contributors to high cholesterol while recommending an overall pattern low in saturated fat, trans fat, sodium, and added sugars. Replacing a sugary food with one that is high in saturated fat would not be a sensible LDL-lowering strategy merely because the replacement contains less sugar.
HDL cholesterol: observational patterns are clearer than intervention effects
Population studies often show lower HDL among people consuming more added sugar, especially sugary drinks. Controlled trials are less consistent. HDL is also influenced by physical activity, smoking, body composition, genetics, alcohol, medications, metabolic health, and many other factors. Sugar intake should therefore be treated as one contributor to a larger lipid pattern rather than as a standalone explanation for an individual HDL result.
How Can Sugar Affect Blood Lipids?
1. The liver can convert carbohydrate carbon into fatty acids
When carbohydrate supply is high, the liver can increase de novo lipogenesis, the synthesis of fatty acids from non-fat precursors. A 2023 review of fructose and hepatic de novo lipogenesis concluded that fructose is more lipogenic than glucose in human and experimental evidence, reflecting the liver’s central role in fructose metabolism. Newly synthesized fatty acids can be assembled into triglycerides, stored in the liver, or exported in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins such as VLDL.
This mechanism explains why sugar can alter a lipid panel even though table sugar itself contains no cholesterol and virtually no fat. The pathway is metabolic, not a literal conversion in which a spoonful of sugar becomes a spoonful of cholesterol.
2. Excess energy changes the context
The metabolic effect of sugar is amplified when it adds calories on top of an already sufficient diet. Energy surplus can increase body weight and liver fat, and those changes can worsen triglycerides and other cardiometabolic risk markers. In tightly controlled studies, the same sugar can look less harmful when it replaces another source of carbohydrate at equal calories than when it creates an energy surplus.
3. Food form changes how much is consumed
A soft drink, a whole orange, a sweetened yogurt, and a dessert can contain overlapping sugar molecules while producing very different eating experiences. Water content, fiber, protein, fat, texture, chewing, portion size, and energy density all affect how quickly energy is consumed and how filling the food is. This is why a useful nutrition answer must look beyond the chemistry of sucrose or fructose alone.
4. The replacement nutrient matters
Diet studies are always substitution studies, even when that fact is hidden. If someone eats less sugar, something else usually fills the energy gap. Replacing added sugar with whole grains, legumes, fruit, vegetables, nuts, seeds, or unsaturated-fat sources creates a different cardiometabolic pattern than replacing it with refined starch or saturated-fat-rich foods. The question “Is sugar bad?” therefore needs a second question: “Compared with what?”
Is Fructose Worse for Cholesterol?
Fructose receives special attention because it is handled extensively by the intestine and liver and can stimulate hepatic lipogenesis. Sucrose is roughly half glucose and half fructose, while high-fructose corn syrup contains both glucose and fructose in varying proportions. The important scientific question is not whether fructose has distinct metabolism—it does—but whether ordinary dietary fructose has uniquely harmful lipid effects independent of calories, dose, and food source.
A 2015 meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials found that fructose exchanged isocalorically for other carbohydrates did not significantly worsen major lipid targets overall. When fructose provided excess calories, however, adverse effects appeared for some lipid measures, including triglycerides and apolipoprotein B. The post-meal triglyceride meta-analysis reached a similar energy-context conclusion.
This evidence does not make high fructose intake harmless. It shows why statements such as “fructose turns straight into fat” need context. Dose and energy balance matter, and results from high-dose overfeeding experiments should not be applied mechanically to the fructose inside a piece of whole fruit.
Added Sugar, Free Sugars, Total Sugar, and Natural Sugar Are Not the Same
In the United States, the FDA’s Added Sugars definition covers sugars added during food processing, sugars packaged as sweeteners, sugars from syrups and honey, and certain sugars from concentrated fruit or vegetable juices. Added Sugars are already included within Total Sugars on the Nutrition Facts label. The English Hub’s Added Sugar guide explains the label category in detail.
The World Health Organization uses a broader term, free sugars. WHO’s current Healthy Diet guidance includes sugars added by manufacturers, cooks, or consumers plus sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit-juice concentrates. WHO recommends keeping free sugars below 10% of total energy intake and notes that 5% or less may provide additional health benefits.
Naturally occurring sugars in intact fruit and plain milk do not fit neatly into the same exposure category. A label showing Total Sugars does not tell you by itself whether the food is a major source of added sugar. That distinction matters when evaluating cardiovascular risk and when reading epidemiologic studies.
What About Sugar in Whole Fruit?
Whole fruit contains glucose, fructose, and sucrose, but it also contains water, fiber, micronutrients, phytochemicals, and a physical food matrix that slows eating and changes satiety. Major dietary guidance encourages fruit as part of a healthy dietary pattern. Treating the fructose in an apple as nutritionally equivalent to an equal amount of free fructose added to a beverage ignores food form and the rest of the diet.
Fruit juice sits in a different category. WHO counts sugars naturally present in fruit juice as free sugars because juicing removes much of the intact structure and makes sugar easier to consume rapidly. This does not mean that every glass of juice has the same effect as soda, but it does mean that “natural sugar” is not a scientifically sufficient category for predicting lipid effects.
Are Brown Sugar, Cane Sugar, Honey, or “Natural” Sweeteners Better for Cholesterol?
Brown sugar, cane sugar, raw sugar, honey, maple syrup, and other caloric sweeteners differ in flavor, water content, trace compounds, and culinary use. None has strong evidence of being a cholesterol-lowering substitute for ordinary table sugar when used to deliver similar amounts of free or added sugar.
This is an example of a health halo. Words such as natural, raw, organic, artisanal, unrefined, or local can change expectations about healthfulness. Those cues may be meaningful for taste, production, ethics, or identity, but they do not automatically produce a clinically important advantage for LDL, HDL, or triglycerides.
Sugar Versus Saturated Fat: Which Matters More for Cholesterol?
The answer depends on which lipid outcome you mean. For LDL cholesterol, saturated fat is a major dietary lever. For triglycerides, excess refined carbohydrate and added sugar can be particularly important. An overall heart-healthy diet therefore addresses both rather than choosing one villain.
The 2026 American Heart Association scientific statement recommends a pattern rich in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, healthy protein sources, and unsaturated fats, while minimizing added sugars, saturated fat, sodium, and highly processed foods. This pattern-based approach is more scientifically useful than asking whether sugar or fat is the single cause of a lipid result.
A low-sugar cookie rich in butter or coconut oil can still be high in saturated fat. A low-fat drink can still contain a large amount of added sugar. Front-of-package claims simplify food into one feature; lipid biology responds to the whole pattern.
Can Cutting Sugar Lower Cholesterol?
Reducing a high intake of added sugar can improve parts of the lipid profile, particularly triglycerides. The size of the improvement varies. If reducing sugar lowers total calorie intake, leads to weight loss in someone with excess weight, replaces sugary drinks with unsweetened beverages, or shifts the diet toward high-fiber foods and unsaturated fats, the combined effect may be larger than the direct effect of sugar reduction alone.
Randomized evidence does not support promising a dramatic LDL drop from sugar reduction by itself. The Cochrane review found only small average changes in total cholesterol and triglycerides and no clear LDL or HDL effect across the included trials. That does not mean sugar reduction is useless; it means the expected benefit should be matched to the actual evidence.
People sometimes search for “how long after quitting sugar will cholesterol go down.” Trials show that lipid changes can occur within weeks, but there is no universal timeline and “quitting sugar” is an imprecise intervention. A person’s starting diet, body weight, genetics, medications, physical activity, alcohol intake, thyroid status, liver health, and other factors all influence the result.
Practical Meaning: What Changes Are Most Likely to Matter?
For someone looking at sugar through a cholesterol lens, the highest-value changes are usually simple and pattern based rather than extreme.
First, identify repeated sources of added sugar. Sugary drinks, sweetened coffee or tea, desserts, candy, sweet snacks, flavored dairy products, and some breakfast foods can contribute substantial added sugar. A single special-occasion dessert is a different exposure from a beverage consumed several times every day.
Second, use the Nutrition Facts label rather than relying on packaging language. The How to Read Sugar on a Nutrition Facts Label guide explains Total Sugars, Added Sugars, serving size, and % Daily Value. Added Sugars are a subset of Total Sugars, so the two numbers should not be added together.
Third, pay attention to the replacement. Water, unsweetened tea, plain coffee, whole fruit, minimally processed grains, legumes, vegetables, nuts, seeds, fish, and other foods within a heart-healthy pattern can change several dietary variables at once. Replacing sugar with a product high in saturated fat or refined starch may simply trade one unfavorable feature for another.
Fourth, change recurring habits before trying to eliminate every trace of sugar. The English Hub’s How to Reduce Sugar article focuses on practical reductions in added sugar, food cues, drinks, substitutions, and habit design without requiring a “detox.”
Fifth, treat an abnormal lipid panel as medical information rather than a moral score. Diet is one contributor. Genetics, age, medications, endocrine conditions, body composition, alcohol, smoking, activity, kidney or liver disease, and other factors can matter. Very high LDL or triglycerides require professional interpretation because lifestyle changes and medical treatment may both be relevant.
The Psychology of “Sugar and Cholesterol”
A single number encourages a single-cause story
People often talk about “my cholesterol” as though cholesterol were one number. That makes it cognitively easy to search for one food that raised it and one food to remove. In reality, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, non-HDL cholesterol, and other markers can move differently. A single-cause story feels clear, but it can direct attention away from the actual pattern.
Naturalness can create a health halo
A sweetener labeled raw, natural, organic, coconut, cane, or artisanal can feel metabolically gentler than white table sugar. Taste and provenance may genuinely differ, yet the health inference often outruns the evidence. For cholesterol-related questions, the useful variables remain amount, food form, overall energy intake, the rest of the diet, and what the sweetener replaces.
Restriction can become all-or-nothing thinking
The belief that cholesterol improvement requires “zero sugar” can turn an evidence-based goal into a rigid rule. That framing makes normal eating situations feel like success or failure and can encourage cycles of strict restriction and rebound eating. A more durable approach is to target high-frequency added-sugar sources while keeping the overall dietary pattern nutritionally adequate and enjoyable.
Symptoms are a poor guide to cholesterol
High cholesterol usually cannot be inferred from how someone feels after eating sugar. Tiredness after a meal, cravings, headache, mood changes, or a perceived “sugar crash” do not diagnose high LDL or high triglycerides. Cholesterol and triglycerides are laboratory measurements. Symptom interpretation should not replace testing or professional assessment.
What the Evidence Supports — and What It Does Not
Established evidence: very high or frequent intake of added/free sugars can contribute to an unfavorable cardiometabolic pattern; triglycerides are particularly responsive under high-sugar and excess-energy conditions; sugar-sweetened beverages are a practical target for reduction; overall diet quality matters; saturated fat remains an important determinant of LDL.
Supported but context dependent: higher sugar intake can raise LDL in some controlled trials; high added-sugar intake is associated with lower HDL and worse lipid patterns in observational studies; fructose can stimulate hepatic lipogenesis more strongly than glucose, especially at high intakes and in excess-energy conditions.
Uncertain or overstated claims: every form of sugar raises LDL substantially; fructose in whole fruit behaves like a high-dose fructose drink; brown or raw sugar protects cholesterol; eliminating sugar guarantees normal cholesterol; a craving for sugar shows a clinical addiction; symptoms after a sweet meal reveal what a lipid panel would show.
Sugar and Cholesterol Is Not the Same as Blood-Sugar Management
Dietary sugar can influence cardiometabolic health, but a cholesterol article should not silently become a guide to glucose medicine. Fasting glucose, A1C, continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, medication adjustment, insulin dosing, and individualized diabetes targets require their own clinical context. A person can have an abnormal lipid profile with normal glucose measures, or abnormal glucose measures with a very different lipid pattern.
If a laboratory result is abnormal, the relevant next step is interpretation of the actual lipid panel and overall cardiovascular risk, not guessing from sugar intake alone. This is especially important with markedly elevated LDL or triglycerides, a strong family history of premature cardiovascular disease, known cardiovascular disease, or other medical conditions that affect lipids.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does sugar raise cholesterol?
It can worsen the blood-lipid profile, especially by raising triglycerides. LDL can also rise under some higher-sugar conditions, but randomized evidence is mixed and the average LDL effect is less consistent than the triglyceride effect.
Does sugar raise LDL cholesterol?
Some controlled trials and meta-analyses find higher LDL on higher-sugar diets, while other analyses find little or no clear LDL effect after accounting for study quality, publication bias, calories, and the comparison diet. Saturated fat remains a major dietary determinant of LDL.
Does sugar raise triglycerides?
Yes, this is the most consistent lipid concern. High sugar intake, particularly when it adds excess calories, can increase hepatic triglyceride production and circulating triglycerides. Fructose overfeeding produces a particularly clear signal in controlled studies.
Can sugar lower HDL cholesterol?
Observational studies often associate higher added-sugar intake with lower HDL. Randomized trials are less consistent, so it is better to describe lower HDL as part of an observed high-sugar dietary pattern than as an inevitable direct effect of every sugar exposure.
Is fructose worse than glucose for cholesterol?
Fructose has a stronger capacity to stimulate liver fat synthesis, but dose and energy balance are crucial. When fructose replaces other carbohydrate at equal calories, major lipid effects are often small or absent; when high fructose intake adds excess calories, triglyceride and related lipid effects become more apparent.
Does fruit sugar raise cholesterol?
Whole fruit should not be treated as equivalent to added sugar or a sugar-sweetened beverage. It contains sugar within a fiber- and water-rich food matrix and is part of heart-healthy dietary patterns. Fruit juice is less structurally intact and its sugars count as free sugars under WHO guidance.
Is honey better than sugar for cholesterol?
There is no strong evidence that using honey instead of table sugar, gram for gram as a caloric sweetener, is a cholesterol-lowering intervention. Honey has a different flavor and composition, but it still contributes free sugar under WHO terminology and added sugar within FDA labeling rules when used as a sweetener.
Will quitting sugar lower cholesterol?
Reducing a high added-sugar intake can improve triglycerides and may improve other risk factors, especially when it lowers excess calorie intake or improves overall diet quality. It does not guarantee a large LDL reduction, and “quit sugar” is too broad to predict an individual laboratory response.
How quickly can cholesterol change after reducing sugar?
Diet trials detect lipid changes over periods of weeks to months, but there is no universal timeline. The response depends on the starting diet, the size of the change, weight change, genetics, activity, alcohol, medications, and other medical factors.
Which is worse for cholesterol: sugar or saturated fat?
They affect the lipid profile differently. Saturated fat is a major dietary driver of LDL, while high added-sugar and refined-carbohydrate intake is strongly relevant to triglycerides and broader cardiometabolic risk. A heart-healthy pattern addresses both.
Can I tell from symptoms that sugar has raised my cholesterol?
No. High LDL or triglycerides cannot be diagnosed from cravings, fatigue, headaches, mood changes, or feeling different after sweets. A lipid panel measures the relevant blood lipids.
Should I focus on Total Sugars or Added Sugars?
For U.S. packaged-food choices, the Added Sugars line is usually more useful than Total Sugars for identifying sugars added during processing. Total Sugars also includes naturally occurring sugars. WHO free-sugar guidance uses a broader definition that also includes sugars in honey, syrups, fruit juice, and fruit-juice concentrates.
Bottom Line
Sugar can influence cholesterol-related risk, but the strongest lipid signal is usually triglycerides, not a universal rise in LDL. High added or free sugar intake—especially in sugar-sweetened beverages and in an energy-surplus diet—can worsen triglycerides and may worsen LDL or HDL under some conditions. Randomized evidence for LDL and HDL is mixed, while observational evidence more consistently links high added-sugar patterns with high triglycerides and low HDL.
The practical response is not to treat every gram of sugar as metabolically identical or to replace sugar with any product that happens to be sugar-free. The stronger strategy is to reduce repeated high-dose added-sugar sources, choose whole and minimally processed foods more often, replace saturated fats with unsaturated fats where relevant, and evaluate the whole dietary pattern. For an individual abnormal lipid result, laboratory values and cardiovascular risk deserve direct clinical interpretation.
Related Articles
References
American Heart Association. (2026). 2026 Dietary Guidance to Improve Cardiovascular Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001435
Bergwall, S., Johansson, A., Sonestedt, E., & Acosta, S. (2022). High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD013320. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013320.pub2
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). Preventing High Cholesterol.
Chiavaroli, L., de Souza, R. J., Ha, V., et al. (2015). Effect of Fructose on Established Lipid Targets: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Feeding Trials. Journal of the American Heart Association, 4(9), e001700. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001700
Fattore, E., Botta, F., Agostoni, C., & Bosetti, C. (2017). Effects of free sugars on blood pressure and lipids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nutritional isoenergetic intervention trials. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 105(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.139253
Geidl-Flueck, B., & Gerber, P. A. (2023). Fructose drives de novo lipogenesis affecting metabolic health. Journal of Endocrinology, 257(2), e220270. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-22-0270
Huang, Y., Chen, Z., Chen, B., et al. (2023). Dietary sugar consumption and health: umbrella review. BMJ, 381, e071609. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071609
Te Morenga, L. A., Howatson, A. J., Jones, R. M., & Mann, J. (2014). Dietary sugars and cardiometabolic risk: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of the effects on blood pressure and lipids. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.113.081521
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label.
Wang, D. D., Sievenpiper, J. L., de Souza, R. J., et al. (2014). Effect of fructose on postprandial triglycerides: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Atherosclerosis, 232(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.10.019
Welsh, J. A., Sharma, A., Abramson, J. L., et al. (2010). Caloric sweetener consumption and dyslipidemia among US adults. JAMA, 303(15), 1490–1497. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.449
World Health Organization. (2026). Healthy diet.
Yang, Q., Zhang, Z., Gregg, E. W., et al. (2014). Added sugar intake and cardiovascular diseases mortality among US adults. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(4), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13563