Spiritual Experiences and Mental Health: Clinical and Cultural Context
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 11, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Religion, Spirituality & Meaning-Making · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Spiritual experiences can be among the most meaningful events in a person's life. They may involve a felt presence, a sense of sacred connection, unity, revelation, awe, altered self-experience, perceived communication, visions, voices, dreams, or profound changes in meaning and identity. Some arise during prayer, worship, meditation, pilgrimage, grief, illness, or other major life events; others occur unexpectedly. Psychology can study how these experiences are perceived, interpreted, remembered, integrated, and related to mental health. It does not determine whether a sacred interpretation is metaphysically true or false. A clinically responsible approach therefore begins with the person's own account and cultural or religious context rather than treating spiritual content itself as evidence of disorder. Evidence-based guidance on spiritual history and differential diagnosis supports this contextual approach. Brazilian Psychiatric Association clinical guidelines and the World Psychiatric Association position statement both recommend respectful attention to religion and spirituality in mental health care.
The central clinical principle is simple: a spiritual experience is not a diagnosis. What matters clinically is the whole pattern around the experience—distress, functioning, degree of control, duration and course, associated symptoms, medical and substance context, safety, and fit with the person's cultural and religious world. Systematic research finds that the relationship between nonordinary experiences and mental health is heterogeneous, and that appraisal, controllability, daily-life impact, and social context strongly shape outcomes. Maraldi and colleagues' systematic review and Moreira-Almeida and Cardeña's differential-diagnosis review are important evidence bases for this distinction.
What counts as a spiritual experience?
There is no single universally accepted psychological definition of spirituality or spiritual experience. In research, spirituality may refer to relationships with what a person regards as sacred or transcendent, to experiences of deep connectedness or ultimate meaning, or to practices and identities organized around those concerns. Religion usually adds a communal, institutional, doctrinal, ritual, or traditional framework, although the boundary between religion and spirituality differs across cultures and individuals. Because research instruments define these constructs differently, prevalence estimates and mental-health associations are not perfectly comparable across studies. The Brazilian Psychiatric Association guideline explicitly notes this definitional diversity.
Spiritual experiences also vary in form. A person may report an intense sense of divine presence, unity with creation, an answered prayer, guidance from an ancestor, a vision during worship, a voice understood within a faith tradition, a profound experience in meditation, a sudden sense of purpose, or an altered experience of time, body, or self. Anthropology and cultural psychology show that traditions provide language, expectations, practices, and attentional habits through which people notice and interpret such events. Cassaniti and Luhrmann's comparative work describes how cultural learning can shape the phenomenology and recognition of spiritual experiences without resolving their metaphysical meaning.
The same outward description can therefore carry very different psychological meanings. Hearing a voice during prayer, feeling an ancestral presence during mourning, entering a ritual trance, or experiencing intense unity during contemplation may be expected and valued in one setting, frightening or confusing in another, and clinically significant in a third. The experience should be assessed as part of a person-in-context rather than classified from one striking feature.
Spiritual experience is not a mental disorder by content alone
Clinicians distinguish experiences from disorders by evaluating a syndrome rather than judging a belief or perception in isolation. The strongest contemporary clinical guidance does not support using unusual perceptual content—such as hearing or seeing something others do not perceive—as a reliable stand-alone divider between nonclinical spiritual experiences and psychopathology. The 2023 Brazilian Psychiatric Association practice guideline found that functional impairment, cognitive and behavioral disorganization, negative psychotic symptoms, and other indicators of comorbid mental disorder are more informative than perceptual content alone.
Earlier cross-cultural work reached a compatible conclusion. Moreira-Almeida and Cardeña identified features that may support a nonpathological interpretation, including limited or absent impairment, compatibility with the person's cultural background, recognition by others in the relevant community, some degree of control, absence of major psychiatric comorbidity, and constructive integration over time. These features are guides for assessment rather than a self-diagnostic checklist, and the authors emphasized limitations in the evidence.
Clinical evaluation also avoids a simplistic healthy-versus-ill binary. A spiritually meaningful experience can be distressing without constituting a psychiatric disorder. A person with a diagnosed disorder can have genuine religious or spiritual commitments that remain sources of meaning and support. A symptom can acquire spiritual meaning without the spiritual interpretation being the sole cause of the symptom. Qualitative evidence from people using mental health services repeatedly describes this coexistence of spiritual meaning, coping, struggle, symptoms, and multiple explanatory models. Milner and colleagues' qualitative systematic review synthesizes these themes across 38 studies.
The clinical question: context, distress, functioning, and course
Meaning and appraisal
How a person understands an experience influences whether it becomes reassuring, frightening, identity-affirming, isolating, or destabilizing. Two people can report a similar perceptual event and have very different outcomes because one experiences it as coherent within a supportive tradition while the other experiences it as threatening, incomprehensible, or socially rejected. In the systematic review of nonordinary experiences, Maraldi et al. highlighted appraisal processes as a major factor associated with mental-health outcomes and called for better separation of the experience itself from the meaning assigned to it.
Voluntariness, control, duration, and recurrence
Clinical assessment asks whether the experience was sought or unexpected, whether it occurred in a recognized practice, whether the person could enter or leave the state voluntarily, whether the experience was brief or prolonged, whether it recurs, and how the person functions before and after it. Loss of control is not automatically diagnostic, because some ritual practices intentionally involve surrender or altered agency, yet persistent involuntary episodes that disrupt ordinary functioning deserve closer assessment. Research in contemplative settings likewise shows that context, duration, impairment, and need for intervention matter more than assigning a universal meaning to the experience. Lindahl and colleagues documented how Buddhist practitioners and teachers use contextual criteria when evaluating challenging meditation-related experiences.
Distress, impairment, and associated symptoms
A clinician asks whether the experience is causing significant suffering, interfering with work or school, disrupting relationships, impairing self-care, creating dangerous behavior, or occurring alongside broader changes in thought, mood, cognition, sleep, or behavior. Functional impairment is especially important because striking spiritual content can occur without major dysfunction, while serious disorders usually reveal themselves through a wider pattern over time. The Brazilian Psychiatric Association guideline gives functional impairment and disorganization greater diagnostic weight than the mere presence of unusual perception.
Culture and religious tradition change the meaning of an experience
Cultural competence requires more than asking whether an experience is 'normal in the culture.' Religious traditions are internally diverse, and people differ in observance, denomination, migration history, family expectations, language, gender roles, generation, and relationship to religious authority. A practice can be recognized by a community while still being unwanted or harmful for a particular individual. Conversely, an unfamiliar practice can be healthy and meaningful even when a clinician has never encountered it before.
The American Psychiatric Association's Cultural Formulation Interview resources provide a structured way to ask how people define a problem, what they believe caused it, what supports or stresses surround it, and what kinds of help they prefer. These tools are intended to enhance clinical decision-making rather than function as stand-alone diagnostic tests. In spiritual assessment, the same principle means asking the person how the experience is understood within their own tradition and relationships rather than substituting an outsider's assumption.
Cultural context can also influence help seeking. A 2026 review of religion and spirituality in pathways to care for psychosis found substantial variation across Christian, Muslim, and Indigenous American frameworks in meaning-making, preferred helpers, and relationships with psychiatric services. The authors argue for reciprocal, culturally informed collaboration rather than forcing one explanatory model to erase another. Badran and colleagues emphasize that trust can improve when clinical and spiritual care are coordinated respectfully.
Spiritual experiences and psychosis: the differential diagnosis
Psychosis is a clinical syndrome involving disruptions in thought and perception and, in many cases, difficulty distinguishing internal experience from external reality. Hallucinations and delusions can occur in psychosis, but the presence of a voice, vision, sensed presence, revelation, or unusual conviction does not by itself establish psychosis. The National Institute of Mental Health overview of psychosis describes the broader symptom picture, including disorganized thinking and behavior, functional decline, and changes in sleep and self-care. Clinical diagnosis belongs to a full assessment of this wider pattern.
Spiritual awakening vs. psychosis
The phrase 'spiritual awakening' is used in many communities to describe a major change in meaning, identity, values, perception, or felt connection with the sacred. It is not a psychiatric diagnosis. Some awakenings are integrated without major impairment; some are intensely challenging; and some experiences described as spiritual awakening occur during a psychotic or mood episode. The phrase therefore cannot resolve the clinical question. Assessment focuses on functioning, thought organization, sleep, behavior, safety, duration, associated mood or cognitive changes, and the person's cultural context.
The most useful approach is neither to dismiss the person's spiritual interpretation nor to let a spiritual label substitute for clinical assessment. A person may simultaneously understand an experience spiritually and benefit from psychiatric or psychological care. Research with people experiencing psychosis finds that religion and spirituality can function as coping resources, sources of struggle, or frameworks for understanding symptoms. Westhead and Georgiades' 2025 systematic review found mixed associations and substantial heterogeneity, underscoring the need to separate specific forms of coping and clinical context.
Religious content inside a psychotic disorder
When psychosis has religious content, the clinician still evaluates the syndrome rather than treating religion itself as the pathology. In an outpatient study, religious delusions were not simply a marker of greater overall clinical severity than other delusions, and many participants also described spirituality as helpful for coping. The authors argued for examining the clinical and psychosocial context rather than relying on the stigmatizing shorthand of a 'religious delusion.' Mohr and colleagues provide one empirical example of this distinction.
For a fuller explanation of psychosis symptoms, causes, clinical assessment, and when to seek help, see Psychosis: Symptoms, Causes, Types, and When to Seek Help. That article is the English Hub's clinical owner for psychosis itself; the present article focuses on the spiritual and cultural context of differential assessment.
Trance, possession, and dissociative experiences
Trance and possession experiences require especially careful cultural interpretation. Many traditions include voluntary or culturally recognized forms of trance, mediumship, possession, or altered agency. Their religious meaning should not be converted into a psychiatric diagnosis simply because the state looks unusual to an observer. At the same time, involuntary, unwanted, recurrent, dangerous, or severely impairing episodes can require clinical evaluation.
ICD-11 has specific dissociative categories for trance disorder and possession trance disorder, with requirements that go well beyond the appearance of trance or a possession explanation. The distinction involves involuntariness, clinical significance, cultural context, and differential diagnosis. For the dedicated clinical classification guide, see Trance Disorder and Possession Trance Disorder: ICD-11 and Cultural Context. This separation preserves the EN-47 focus on spiritual experience while leaving dissociative disorder classification to its clinical canonical owner.
Religious practice, OCD, and scrupulosity
Prayer, confession, ritual observance, moral reflection, and concern with religious duties are ordinary parts of many faith traditions. Their presence does not indicate obsessive-compulsive disorder. Scrupulosity becomes a clinical OCD question when religious or moral themes are embedded in obsessions, compulsions, repetitive reassurance seeking, ritualized certainty seeking, or other OCD processes that cause distress and impairment. The relevant distinction is the psychological function and compulsive pattern, not whether the subject matter is religious.
For OCD-specific assessment and treatment, including religious obsessions, moral fear, guilt, and ritual compulsion, see Scrupulosity OCD: What Is It? Religious Obsessions, Moral Fear, Rituals, Guilt, and Treatment. This article does not duplicate that clinical intent.
Mood episodes, sleep loss, substances, and medical conditions
A spiritual interpretation does not remove the need to assess other clinical causes when the surrounding pattern suggests them. Marked elevation or irritability, rapidly increased activity, racing thoughts, unusually fast speech, and a reduced need for sleep can occur in mania and require mood-disorder assessment. The National Institute of Mental Health bipolar disorder guide describes this syndrome. Similarly, psychosis-like experiences can occur with severe sleep deprivation, substances, medications, neurological illness, and other medical conditions, so new or rapidly changing experiences may call for medical as well as psychological evaluation.
This is why a clinician asks about chronology. Did the spiritual experience occur within a period of several nights with little sleep? Did it begin after a medication change, intoxication, withdrawal, fever, seizure-like episode, head injury, or other acute medical change? Did confusion or cognitive decline appear at the same time? These questions do not challenge a person's spiritual beliefs. They identify conditions in which prompt clinical or medical assessment can prevent harm.
How spiritual experiences can relate to mental health
Meaning, identity, connection, and coping
For many people, spiritual experiences are associated with meaning, hope, identity, belonging, consolation, or a sense of connection. Qualitative studies among people with mental health difficulties describe spirituality as intertwined with meaning-making, identity, coping, service use, and recovery. Milner et al. found that participants often wanted clinicians to be able to discuss spirituality without dismissing it or automatically pathologizing it.
Quantitative evidence also suggests associations between spirituality and some favorable mental-health outcomes, but those associations should not be presented as guaranteed treatment effects. A 2026 systematic review of spirituality in relation to depression, anxiety, and PTSD found predominantly inverse associations with depressive and anxiety symptoms, while also showing that spiritual conflict and unmet spiritual needs can be linked with greater distress. Okan and Şahin emphasize the importance of context and individual differences.
Spiritual struggle and distress
Spirituality can also become a site of conflict. A person may feel abandoned by God, guilty, condemned, spiritually unsafe, alienated from a community, unable to reconcile suffering with prior beliefs, or torn between religious and clinical explanations. These experiences can intensify distress even when they do not constitute a psychiatric disorder in themselves. In psychosis research, positive and negative religious coping show different associations with recovery and symptom burden, which argues against treating 'religion' as a single protective or harmful variable. Westhead and Georgiades summarize this mixed evidence.
The role of appraisal and social response
The aftermath of an experience may matter as much as the experience itself. Supportive interpretation, trusted relationships, a coherent cultural framework, and the ability to integrate the event into ordinary life may reduce distress. Fear, stigma, social isolation, coercive responses, or catastrophic interpretations may increase it. The systematic review by Maraldi and colleagues specifically highlights appraisal and contextual variables, while also warning that current research often mixes the experience with the interpretation used to measure it.
How clinicians can assess spiritual experiences respectfully
Begin with a spiritual and cultural history
A respectful assessment starts with open questions: What happened, in the person's own words? What does the experience mean to them? Does it fit a religious or spiritual tradition they identify with? Is it recognized by trusted people within that tradition? Was the experience sought, welcomed, feared, or unwanted? What changed afterward? Does the person want spiritual issues included in care? The Brazilian Psychiatric Association guideline recommends routine spiritual history taking as part of compassionate and culturally sensitive mental health care.
Assess the full clinical pattern
The interview then examines the experience's form, frequency, duration, triggers, controllability, and course; sleep and energy; mood changes; thought organization; memory; cognition; self-care; work or school performance; relationships; medical history; medications; substances; trauma and stress where relevant; and any symptoms occurring outside the spiritual context. The clinician asks what was present before the experience and what persisted afterward. A single vivid story is clinically less informative than the longitudinal pattern.
Separate culturally shared meaning from individual impairment
Community recognition is relevant but not decisive. A clinician may ask whether similar experiences occur in the person's tradition, whether there are expected rituals or boundaries around them, and whether a knowledgeable community member sees the event as familiar. The clinician also asks whether the individual personally feels safe, consenting, and able to function. Cultural fit cannot erase severe impairment, and unfamiliarity cannot create pathology.
Use assessment tools as aids, not verdicts
Questionnaires can help organize symptom or spiritual-history information, but no score can determine whether a particular spiritual experience is a psychotic disorder, dissociative disorder, mood episode, OCD presentation, or nonclinical spiritual event. The American Psychiatric Association explicitly states that its assessment measures are intended to enhance clinical decision-making rather than serve as the sole basis for diagnosis.
Collaborate across clinical and spiritual systems when the person wants it
When religion or spirituality is central to the person's understanding, collaboration with a chaplain, clergy member, spiritual care provider, elder, or other trusted religious figure may help clarify cultural meaning and strengthen engagement. Such collaboration should be guided by the person's preferences and consent and should complement rather than delay needed medical or psychiatric care. Badran et al. describe reciprocal clinical-spiritual collaboration as especially relevant to culturally responsive pathways into psychosis care.
How psychotherapy can respond
Psychotherapy can make room for spiritual meaning without requiring the therapist to endorse or dispute the truth of a religious claim. The therapeutic work can focus on distress, functioning, relationships, coping, values, uncertainty, grief, shame, fear, sleep, behavior, or integration of the experience. When clients want their religion or spirituality included, competent care can draw on their own beliefs and practices while respecting clinical boundaries.
Spiritual and religious competence is a recognized dimension of professional psychology. Vieten and Lukoff argue that psychologists need specific competencies for working with religious and spiritual diversity rather than assuming general multicultural training automatically covers this area. The World Psychiatric Association likewise recommends person-centered consideration of religion and spirituality and rejects the use of professional authority to promote either spiritual or secular worldviews.
A therapist should therefore avoid turning treatment into theological debate. If the person regards the experience as sacred, therapy can respect that meaning while still asking whether the experience is helping or harming functioning, whether it is associated with severe symptoms, and what support the person wants. If a religious practice is stabilizing and safe, there is no clinical basis for stopping it merely because it is religious. If a practice is entangled with compulsions, extreme sleep loss, self-harm, medical risk, coercion, or escalating disorganization, the specific risk should be addressed directly.
When a spiritual experience warrants prompt or urgent clinical attention
Prompt professional assessment is appropriate when a new or rapidly changing spiritual experience is accompanied by major functional decline, severe confusion or disorganization, inability to care for basic needs, persistent inability to sleep, marked agitation or unusually elevated activity, dangerous behavior, heavy substance use, or new neurological or medical symptoms. These features shift the concern from the spiritual content toward the person's overall safety and clinical state.
Urgent evaluation is warranted when the person is at immediate risk of harming themselves or someone else, cannot keep themselves safe, is profoundly disoriented, or is responding to commands or beliefs in ways that create imminent danger. The NIMH psychosis resource advises seeking professional help when psychosis-like changes intensify or persist and emergency help in life-threatening situations. Local emergency services and crisis resources should be used according to the person's country and location.
Seeking clinical help does not require abandoning a spiritual interpretation. Care can address sleep, mood, fear, disorganization, safety, or medical contributors while the person retains their own religious framework. Respectful dual attention to meaning and clinical risk often provides a stronger route to engagement than forcing an either-or choice.
Is 'spiritual emergency' a diagnosis?
The term 'spiritual emergency' is used in some popular, pastoral, and transpersonal settings to describe a period of intense spiritual change accompanied by distress or disequilibrium. It is not a standalone diagnosis in DSM-5-TR or ICD-11. Clinically, the term can describe how a person understands a crisis, but it does not replace assessment of mood, psychosis, dissociation, trauma-related symptoms, sleep, substances, medical conditions, functioning, and safety. The APA assessment resources and the WHO ICD-11 clinical diagnostic manual provide the formal diagnostic frameworks.
What current research can and cannot establish
The evidence base supports several conclusions with reasonable confidence. Spiritual experiences occur in people with and without mental disorders. Their relationship to mental health is variable. Perceptual content alone is a weak basis for differential diagnosis. Functional impairment, disorganization, associated symptoms, course, control, appraisal, and cultural fit provide more useful clinical information. Person-centered spiritual history and cultural formulation can improve the quality of assessment.
The evidence is weaker when research tries to predict outcomes from a single type of experience or to infer causality from correlations between spirituality and mental health. Studies use inconsistent definitions of spirituality, religion, mystical experience, anomalous experience, and well-being. Samples are often drawn from specific countries, faiths, clinical groups, or self-selected spiritual communities. Many studies are cross-sectional, and culturally validated measures remain uneven. Maraldi et al. identify conceptual overlap and measurement problems, while Milner et al. show how qualitative evidence adds dimensions that symptom scales can miss.
Neuroscience can investigate brain activity during prayer, meditation, absorption, awe, or reported spiritual states, but neural correlates do not settle the truth or meaning of a religious experience. Cultural psychology can show how attention, expectation, ritual, and language shape experience, but those mechanisms do not prove that spiritual interpretations are false. Clinical psychology can assess distress, functioning, coping, and risk while leaving sacred truth claims within the domains in which people and traditions understand them.
Frequently asked questions
Are spiritual experiences a sign of mental illness?
No conclusion follows from spiritual content alone. Spiritual experiences are reported by people with and without mental disorders. Clinical concern depends on the broader pattern: distress, impairment, disorganization, loss of function, associated symptoms, course, safety, medical factors, and cultural context. Current evidence-based guidance specifically warns against using perceptual experiences alone to distinguish pathology.
Can a person hear a voice or see a vision without having psychosis?
Yes. Voice-hearing and vision-like experiences can occur in nonclinical, cultural, religious, bereavement, sleep-related, contemplative, and other contexts. The clinical question is whether the experience forms part of a psychotic syndrome or another disorder. Assessment looks at reality testing, thought organization, functioning, associated symptoms, course, and context rather than making a diagnosis from one perception. Moreira-Almeida and Cardeña review evidence for nonpathological spiritual experiences that include psychotic-like or dissociative phenomena.
How do clinicians tell a spiritual experience from psychosis?
They do not use a single test. They examine functioning, distress, thought and behavior organization, mood, sleep, cognition, control, duration, recurrence, cultural recognition, comorbid symptoms, medical and substance factors, and what happens outside the spiritual setting. The 2023 Brazilian Psychiatric Association guideline provides one of the most systematic current evidence reviews for this differential assessment.
Does distress mean the experience is pathological?
Not necessarily. A profound experience can be frightening, destabilizing, grief-related, or difficult to integrate without meeting criteria for a mental disorder. Distress is clinically important because it signals a need for support, but diagnosis also depends on the nature, duration, impairment, associated syndrome, and differential assessment. Maraldi et al. found that outcomes depend on multiple psychological and social factors rather than on the experience alone.
Can spiritual experiences be beneficial for mental health?
They can be associated with meaning, hope, connection, coping, and positive affect for some people. They can also be associated with fear, spiritual struggle, confusion, or delayed help seeking in other circumstances. The evidence does not justify a universal claim that spirituality is therapeutic. Okan and Şahin's 2026 systematic review and Milner et al.'s qualitative systematic review both show this context-dependent pattern.
Should a therapist challenge a client's religious interpretation?
The usual clinical task is to understand what the interpretation means, assess its relationship to symptoms and functioning, and work toward the client's goals. A therapist can evaluate dangerous behavior, severe symptoms, or medical risk without declaring a sacred belief true or false. Professional competence requires respect for religious and spiritual diversity and avoidance of proselytizing, as emphasized by Vieten and Lukoff and the World Psychiatric Association.
Can clinicians work with clergy or spiritual care providers?
Yes, when the person wants that collaboration and consent and confidentiality are respected. A spiritual care provider may help clarify tradition-specific meaning, while the mental health clinician addresses symptoms, functioning, safety, and treatment. Collaboration should support rather than replace indicated medical or psychiatric care. Badran et al. describe this kind of reciprocal collaboration in pathways to care for psychosis.
When should someone seek help after an intense spiritual experience?
Professional support is reasonable whenever the experience is frightening, difficult to integrate, repeatedly disrupts sleep or daily life, causes major conflict, or leaves the person unsure how to function safely. More urgent assessment is appropriate with severe disorganization, inability to care for oneself, dangerous behavior, suicidal intent, rapidly escalating activation, or significant medical or neurological changes. Help can be sought without giving up the person's spiritual understanding of what happened.
Related Articles
Psychosis: Symptoms, Causes, Types, and When to Seek Help — the clinical overview for psychosis symptoms, differential causes, and help seeking.
Trance Disorder and Possession Trance Disorder: ICD-11 and Cultural Context — the clinical classification guide for involuntary trance and possession trance presentations.
Scrupulosity OCD: What Is It? Religious Obsessions, Moral Fear, Rituals, Guilt, and Treatment — the OCD-specific guide for religious and moral obsessions and compulsions.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (n.d.). DSM-5-TR Online Assessment Measures: Cultural Formulation Interviews. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/dsm/educational-resources/assessment-measures
Badran, L., Niendam, T., Shapiro, D. I., Burch, K. E., Hardy, K. V., Wright, S., Safdar, M., Bhatt, A., Giroux, C., Hotz, B., Adhikari, N., Salaheldin, K., & Hayes, S. L. (2026). Pathways to mental health care: The role of religion and spirituality in help seeking for psychosis. Psychiatric Services, 77(6), 549–557. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20250629
Cassaniti, J. L., & Luhrmann, T. M. (2014). The cultural kindling of spiritual experiences. Current Anthropology, 55(S10). https://doi.org/10.1086/677881
Lindahl, J. R., Cooper, D. J., Fisher, N. E., Kirmayer, L. J., & Britton, W. B. (2020). Progress or pathology? Differential diagnosis and intervention criteria for meditation-related challenges: Perspectives from Buddhist meditation teachers and practitioners. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01905
Maraldi, E. O., Taves, A., Moll, J., Hartle, L., Moreira-de-Oliveira, M. E., Bortolini, T., & Fischer, R. (2024). Nonordinary experiences, well-being and mental health: A systematic review of the evidence and recommendations for future research. Journal of Religion and Health, 63(1), 410–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01875-8
Milner, K., Crawford, P., Edgley, A., Hare-Duke, L., & Slade, M. (2020). The experiences of spirituality among adults with mental health difficulties: A qualitative systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29, e34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796019000234
Mohr, S., Borras, L., Betrisey, C., Brandt, P.-Y., Gilliéron, C., & Huguelet, P. (2010). Delusions with religious content in patients with psychosis: How they interact with spiritual coping. Psychiatry, 73(2), 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2010.73.2.158
Moreira-Almeida, A., & Cardeña, E. (2011). Differential diagnosis between non-pathological psychotic and spiritual experiences and mental disorders: A contribution from Latin American studies to the ICD-11. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 33(Suppl 1), S21–S36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-44462011000500004
Moreira-Almeida, A., Sharma, A., van Rensburg, B. J., Verhagen, P. J., & Cook, C. C. H. (2016). WPA Position Statement on Spirituality and Religion in Psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(1), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20304
Mosqueiro, B. P., Costa, M. A., Caribé, A. C., Oliveira e Oliveira, F. H. A., Pizutti, L., Zimpel, R. R., Baldaçara, L., da Silva, A. G., & Moreira-Almeida, A. (2023). Brazilian Psychiatric Association guidelines on the integration of spirituality into mental health clinical practice: Part 1. Spiritual history and differential diagnosis. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 45(6), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3056
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Bipolar Disorder. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/bipolar-disorder
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Understanding Psychosis. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis
Okan, N., & Şahin, Y. (2026). The effects of spirituality on depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Religion and Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-026-02671-w
Vieten, C., & Lukoff, D. (2022). Spiritual and religious competencies in psychology. American Psychologist, 77(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000821
Westhead, M., & Georgiades, A. (2025). The role of spirituality and religiosity in the maintenance and recovery of psychosis: A systematic review. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 19(7), e70061. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70061
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077263