Social Media Envy: Upward Comparison, Self-Esteem, and Well-Being

2 days ago

18 min read

Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 27, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Social media envy is the painful sense that someone else has something you want—status, beauty, relationships, travel, success, money, confidence, recognition, or a life that appears more complete than your own—after you encounter that person or portrayal online. The feeling is psychologically real, but it is not a psychiatric diagnosis, a sign that social media has “damaged” your brain, or proof that everyone who scrolls through polished feeds will feel worse. It is a specific emotional response that often emerges from upward social comparison: comparing yourself with someone you perceive as better off in a personally important domain.

The most useful scientific picture is more nuanced than the familiar “highlight reels make everyone miserable” story. A 2022 critical review found that earlier research often linked social comparison and envy on social media with lower well-being, while newer work increasingly found heterogeneous, person-specific, conditional, reciprocal, and sometimes positive effects. That review is a good starting point because it treats users as active people in contexts rather than as passive recipients of a uniform platform effect.

At the same time, the mechanism is not imaginary. A 2023 meta-analysis of 48 experimental studies involving 7,679 participants found a small overall negative effect of exposure to upward comparison targets on self-evaluations and emotions, including self-esteem and subjective well-being. The experimental meta-analysis supports a causal claim about short-term exposure to upward comparison content under study conditions. It does not establish that ordinary social media use inevitably produces chronic low self-esteem, depression, or poor well-being.

This article focuses specifically on envy as the comparison-related outcome owned by this page. For the broader evidence on platforms, activities, benefits, risks, and mental health, see Social Media and Mental Health: Risks, Benefits, and What Research Shows.

What Is Social Media Envy?

Social media envy is envy experienced in relation to people, possessions, experiences, achievements, relationships, bodies, lifestyles, or social standing encountered through social media. Researchers usually treat envy as an emotion arising when another person has an advantage that matters to you and the comparison makes your own position feel inferior or lacking. The target does not have to be a celebrity. A classmate’s internship, a friend’s engagement, a colleague’s promotion, a stranger’s apartment, or an acquaintance’s vacation may be more psychologically relevant precisely because the target feels comparable.

The term describes an emotional experience and a research construct. There is no DSM or ICD diagnosis called social media envy. Feeling envious after seeing somebody else’s post can fall entirely within ordinary emotional life. Clinical relevance depends on broader patterns such as persistent distress, functional impairment, depressive or anxiety symptoms, disordered eating symptoms, or another recognized mental health problem—not on envy alone.

Social media also does not create the human capacity for envy. People compared themselves with neighbors, siblings, coworkers, rivals, public figures, and peers long before feeds existed. Digital platforms change the environment in which comparisons can occur: they make large amounts of socially relevant information continuously available, allow self-presentation to be selected and edited, display visible signals of popularity or achievement, and permit repeated exposure to people outside one’s immediate offline circle. Those features can create more opportunities for comparison without determining how any particular comparison will feel.

Envy, Jealousy, Social Comparison, and FOMO Are Different

Envy

Envy centers on an advantage possessed by another person: “They have something I wish I had.” The emotional core is an unfavorable comparison between the self and another person in a valued domain.

Jealousy

Jealousy is usually organized around a valued relationship and a perceived rival or threat: “I may lose someone or something important to a third party.” Social media can trigger both emotions, but romantic jealousy about likes, ex-partners, messaging, or partner surveillance belongs to a different psychological problem space than envy of another person’s success, appearance, lifestyle, or status.

Social comparison

Social comparison is the broader evaluative process of judging yourself relative to other people. Upward comparison means comparing with someone perceived as better off; downward comparison means comparing with someone perceived as worse off; lateral comparison involves someone perceived as similar. Envy is one possible emotional response to upward comparison, but upward comparison can also produce admiration, hope, inspiration, discouragement, shame, dissatisfaction, or little emotional response at all.

FOMO

Fear of missing out concerns apprehension that rewarding experiences are occurring without you and a desire to remain connected to what others are doing. FOMO can coexist with envy, but the constructs are not interchangeable. You can envy someone’s career without fearing that you are missing a social event, and you can experience FOMO without wishing to possess another person’s advantage.

Why Social Media Can Create Powerful Upward Comparisons

The comparison environment matters. Social media supplies a stream of information about other people’s lives, and much of that information is self-selected. People are generally more likely to share moments worth sharing than a representative sample of ordinary boredom, uncertainty, failed attempts, debt, conflict, or routine. Even truthful posts can therefore create an informational asymmetry: you see the polished outcome while living through the entire backstage of your own life.

The target also matters. Comparisons are often more emotionally consequential when the other person is close enough to feel relevant. Someone whose age, profession, social circle, body type, background, goals, or resources resemble yours can become a more diagnostic benchmark than an unreachable celebrity. This helps explain why a former classmate’s promotion or a peer’s relationship announcement may sting more than a billionaire’s yacht.

The domain matters as well. A feed full of athletic achievements may be inspiring to one person and almost irrelevant to another, while the same person may react strongly to posts about parenting, academic success, appearance, travel, or income. Envy therefore cannot be inferred from content alone. The comparison has to intersect with what the viewer values, wants, fears, or uses to evaluate the self.

Individual differences shape the pathway. In a study of 696 participants, social comparison orientation—the tendency to compare oneself with others—strengthened the association between passive social networking use and upward comparison. The study also found indirect associations among passive use, upward comparison, self-esteem, and subjective well-being. Because the design was observational, those pathways should be interpreted as associations rather than proof of one-way causation. Read the study.

What the Strongest Evidence Shows

Experimental evidence: upward comparison can lower immediate self-evaluations

The clearest causal evidence comes from experiments that manipulate exposure. McComb, Vanman, and Tobin’s 2023 meta-analysis synthesized 48 experimental studies and 118 effect sizes. Relative to downward comparison or control conditions, upward comparison exposure had a small negative overall effect on self-evaluations and emotions (Hedges’ g = −0.24). The pooled effects were also negative for body image, subjective well-being, mental health outcomes measured in the experiments, and self-esteem. Most participants were young adults and 75% were female, so the estimate should not be treated as a universal effect size for every age, gender, platform, culture, or real-world browsing session.

This distinction between experimental and observational evidence matters. Experimental studies can isolate short-term effects of comparison exposure more effectively, but they usually capture brief, constructed experiences. Observational studies capture life as lived, yet people choose what they view, whom they follow, how they use platforms, and when they log on. Those choices can reflect preexisting mood, self-esteem, depression, interests, and social circumstances.

Current meta-analytic evidence: upward comparison is associated with poorer outcomes, with substantial heterogeneity

A 2026 three-level meta-analysis of 54 independent samples and 36,583 participants found an average correlation of about r = .33 between online upward social comparison and psychological maladjustment. Associations were strongest for social-evaluative negative emotions, a category that included envy, and were also present for anxiety, depression, lower well-being, and lower self-esteem. The authors explicitly caution that most included studies were cross-sectional, heterogeneity was substantial, and the results do not establish universal or one-way causal effects.

That 2026 analysis did not find age, broad cultural category, or data-collection year to be significant moderators in its models. This should not be translated into “age and culture do not matter.” The authors note that the available coding was coarse and the literature remains uneven. A statistical failure to detect moderation in a given evidence base is different from evidence that contexts are psychologically identical.

Real-time adolescent data: most comparisons were not upward

A useful correction to the assumption that social media comparison is constantly upward comes from a 14-day ecological momentary assessment study of 94 adolescents. Burnell and colleagues found that lateral comparisons were much more common than upward or downward comparisons. When upward rather than downward comparisons occurred, adolescents reported poorer momentary self-esteem. Importantly, depressive symptoms also predicted greater likelihood of upward comparison, illustrating how preexisting psychological state can shape what people notice and how they compare.

Classic platform-specific evidence: envy can mediate short-term declines in affect

In a 2015 experimental and experience-sampling study focused on Facebook, passive use was followed by declines in affective well-being, with envy operating as a mediator. That study remains important mechanistic evidence, but it is platform-specific and comes from an earlier social media environment. It should not be generalized into the claim that passive use on every contemporary platform has the same effect for every person.

Why Envy Can Affect Self-Esteem

Self-esteem is a broader evaluation of self-worth, whereas envy is an emotional reaction to another person’s advantage. The two can interact when an upward comparison is interpreted as information about personal inadequacy. A post does not simply say “this person succeeded”; the viewer may infer “their success shows that I am behind,” “their body proves mine is unacceptable,” or “their relationship means my life is failing.” The psychological impact lies partly in that self-referential interpretation.

Across four studies on social media comparison and self-esteem, Midgley and colleagues found that more extreme upward comparisons were associated with immediate declines in state self-esteem and other self-evaluations, and that people with lower self-esteem were more vulnerable to some comparison effects. The findings support the idea that the distance between “me” and the comparison target matters, not simply whether a person has used social media.

A single unfavorable comparison is unlikely to define a person’s stable self-esteem. Repeated, personally salient comparison episodes can matter more when they continually recruit the same self-evaluative domain. Someone whose self-worth is strongly contingent on appearance may react differently to beauty content than someone whose self-worth is anchored elsewhere. Someone who is already feeling unsuccessful at work may react more strongly to career achievements than on a day when work feels secure.

This is one reason that raw screen time is a poor proxy for social media envy. Two people can spend the same number of minutes online while encountering different people, content, motives, activities, and emotional meanings. One may exchange jokes with friends; another may repeatedly compare career milestones; a third may follow art tutorials; a fourth may browse appearance-focused content while feeling vulnerable about body image. Duration alone cannot identify the comparison mechanism.

Does Social Media Envy Cause Depression?

The evidence does not support a simple statement that social media envy causes clinical depression. Depression is a multifactorial disorder, and most studies connecting social comparison, envy, and depressive symptoms are observational. Cross-sectional correlations cannot tell whether comparison leads to symptoms, symptoms make upward comparison more likely, both occur in a reciprocal cycle, or other variables influence both.

A 2023 systematic review of nine studies found correlations among social comparison on social networking sites, envy, and depression. Yet the two studies in that review that were suitable for examining direction found depression predicting subsequent social comparison and envy rather than the reverse. The review therefore highlights reverse and reciprocal pathways rather than a one-direction digital-harm story.

The broader evidence base tells a similar story. An umbrella review of 27 reviews found disagreement across meta-analyses for time spent on social media and for broad active-versus-passive categories. Valkenburg’s umbrella review is one reason current digital psychology increasingly separates specific experiences and mechanisms from total time spent.

For the wider mental-health evidence—including benefits, risks, developmental differences, content, context, and problematic use—see Social Media and Mental Health. This page keeps the narrower ownership: envy as a specific response to unfavorable social comparison.

Envy Is Not Always the End of the Comparison Process

Upward comparison can generate contrast: the other person’s advantage makes the gap feel larger and the self feel worse. But comparison can also generate assimilation: the target feels attainable, informative, or connected to the viewer’s possible future self. The same “better-off” target can therefore evoke discouragement in one context and motivation in another.

Two experiments reported in the Journal of Communication found that optimized Instagram nature and travel posts increased upward comparison but could also facilitate inspiration through an assimilative response described as benign envy, with short-term benefits for well-being. The experiments do not imply that envy is generally beneficial; they show that upward comparison can lead to more than one psychological pathway.

Researchers often distinguish benign and malicious envy. Both begin with the painful recognition that another person has an advantage. Benign envy is oriented more toward improving one’s own position; malicious envy is more closely linked to resentment and wishes to pull the target down. The distinction is useful, but people’s real experiences can be mixed. Admiration, envy, frustration, inspiration, shame, competitiveness, and affection can coexist in the same comparison episode.

Newer experimental work further supports the role of context. In two preregistered experiments, engaging in self-affirming activity involving one’s own Instagram self-presentation reduced envy after participants subsequently browsed a superior peer’s profile. Chen and Toma’s 2026 study suggests that the sequence of activities and the viewer’s psychological state can change the impact of an upward comparison.

Who May Be More Vulnerable to Social Media Envy?

Research does not justify a single profile of the “vulnerable social media user.” Susceptibility is better understood as an interaction among person, content, situation, and platform activity. Several factors can increase the probability that a particular comparison becomes painful.

• High social comparison orientation. People who habitually use others as benchmarks may be more likely to convert browsing into self-evaluation, especially when content is personally relevant.

• Lower or unstable self-esteem. If self-worth is already fragile, superior peers may be more readily interpreted as evidence of personal inadequacy. This is a vulnerability factor, not a destiny.

• Existing depressive symptoms or low mood. Naturalistic adolescent research shows that depressive symptoms can precede upward comparisons, which means psychological distress may shape comparison behavior as well as follow from it.

• Domain-specific insecurity. Appearance, career, academic achievement, parenting, relationships, social status, travel, fitness, wealth, and popularity are not interchangeable comparison domains. The domain that threatens one person may barely register for another.

• Perceived similarity and attainability. Comparisons with similar peers can feel diagnostic because their achievements seem relevant to what “someone like me” could or should have achieved. A target can also be motivating if the gap appears attainable and informative.

• Repetition and selective attention. Someone who repeatedly visits the same triggering profiles, searches for status cues, or notices only upward examples creates a different exposure pattern from someone who encounters an isolated post.

These factors are probabilistic. They help explain variation; they do not establish a diagnosis or guarantee an outcome.

The Role of Curated Self-Presentation, Metrics, and Feeds

Curated self-presentation can make upward comparisons easier because people often show selected outcomes rather than complete processes. A polished post may be truthful while still omitting the failed drafts, arguments, boring days, uncertainty, inherited advantages, professional support, debt, illness, luck, or years of work that surround the visible moment. The viewer compares a full internal biography with a small external sample.

Visible metrics can add another comparison cue. Likes, followers, views, rankings, badges, and public engagement counts turn some forms of social response into explicit numbers. These signals may become status information for users who care about them, but there is no basis for assuming they affect everybody in the same way.

A recent meta-analysis noted plausible roles for image-centric interfaces, engagement ranking, and visible social metrics in facilitating comparison, while also stating that its data could not directly test the contribution of specific design features. That limitation matters: it is reasonable to study how design structures attention and choice, but evidence about user behavior should not be converted into unverified claims about the intentions of particular companies or designers.

User agency remains part of the system. People choose whom to follow, what to search, what to mute, which communities to join, whether to post, whether to comment, when to stop, and how to interpret what they see. Those choices are influenced by platform design and social context, but they are not erased by them. A useful model therefore includes design, individual differences, goals, habits, content, social environment, and situational state together.

Social Media Envy and Problematic Use Are Not the Same Thing

A person can feel envy during ordinary social media use without having a dysregulated use pattern. Conversely, a person can have difficulty controlling social media use without envy being the main mechanism. The constructs overlap in some studies because people who repeatedly seek comparison information may also use platforms in more compulsive ways, yet the concepts should remain separate.

Problematic social media use is a research construct centered on dysregulation, loss of control, salience, conflict, distress, or functional impairment depending on the measure used. It is not established by screen time alone. For the dedicated evidence and diagnostic-language distinctions, see Problematic Social Media Use: Signs, Risk Factors, and Functional Impairment.

Envy can also contribute to a sense that social media is emotionally exhausting, but social media fatigue is a separate construct involving overload, strain, exhaustion, and discontinuance-related responses. See Social Media Fatigue: What It Is, Why It Happens, and What Helps for that evidence.

How to Reduce Social Media Envy Without Treating Normal Emotion as a Disorder

The goal is not to eliminate every upward comparison. Comparison is a normal part of social cognition, and envy can contain information about what matters to you. A more useful aim is to reduce repetitive, misleading, or self-undermining comparison and to increase the chance that comparison becomes informative rather than corrosive.

1. Identify the comparison domain

When envy appears, ask what exactly is being compared. Is it appearance, income, professional status, relationships, social approval, travel, parenting, fitness, creativity, or something else? Naming the domain turns a diffuse “my life is worse” feeling into a more specific signal. Specificity matters because global self-condemnation usually contains much less information than the original comparison.

2. Separate the visible outcome from the invisible denominator

A post shows a sample, not a population. Before using it as a benchmark, consider what you cannot observe: selection, editing, resources, time, opportunity, failed attempts, personal costs, and what the person chose not to share. This does not require assuming that posts are fake. It requires refusing to treat incomplete information as a complete life.

3. Notice which accounts reliably trigger unhelpful contrast

A practical feed audit can be targeted rather than absolute. If one account repeatedly produces resentment, inadequacy, body dissatisfaction, or compulsive comparison without providing useful information or genuine connection, muting or unfollowing it is a reasonable environmental adjustment. The same strategy does not need to be applied to every account or every platform.

4. Shift from rank to information

Ask whether the target provides actionable information. “She is more successful than I am” is a rank statement. “She publishes consistently, collaborates with peers, and has been working in this field for eight years” contains potentially usable information. Turning comparison into process information can reduce the tendency to collapse another person’s outcome into a verdict on your worth.

5. Change the target set

If your feed is dominated by unusually high-status, highly edited, or commercially optimized examples, your intuitive sense of what is normal may become skewed even when you intellectually know the sample is selective. Adding peers, ordinary process accounts, educational sources, diverse bodies and lifestyles, and communities organized around shared interests rather than status can alter the comparison environment.

6. Protect vulnerable moments

Comparison can be more painful when you are tired, lonely, rejected, uncertain, or already dissatisfied with the relevant domain. If you notice that certain browsing patterns reliably worsen those moments, changing timing or context may be more useful than imposing a universal screen-time rule.

7. Use self-affirmation carefully

Self-affirmation means reconnecting with valued aspects of identity rather than simply repeating flattering statements. The 2026 Instagram experiments found that self-affirming profile activity before exposure to a superior peer reduced envy. The finding is promising mechanistic evidence, though it should not be treated as a universal clinical intervention.

8. Do not turn “digital detox” into a moral test

Temporarily reducing exposure may help some people, especially when a specific pattern is clearly distressing, but deleting social media is not a universal treatment for low self-esteem, anxiety, depression, or envy. If the underlying comparison process simply migrates to work, friendships, fitness, dating, or other environments, abstinence alone may leave the main psychological pattern untouched.

When Social Media Envy Deserves More Attention

Envy itself can be ordinary. It deserves closer attention when it becomes persistent, dominates significant parts of online life, repeatedly drives hostile or self-destructive behavior, or is embedded in broader distress. Examples include severe body dissatisfaction, escalating restriction or purging behaviors, persistent depressive symptoms, panic, marked social withdrawal, compulsive monitoring, or impairment in work, school, sleep, or relationships.

In those situations, the useful clinical question is broader than “How do I stop feeling envy?” A mental health professional can assess the symptoms, their duration, functional impact, triggers, and other contributing factors. Treatment would address the recognized problem—such as depression, an anxiety disorder, an eating disorder, or another clinically significant pattern—rather than treating “social media envy” as a standalone diagnosis.

If the main problem is milder but repetitive comparison distress, structured self-observation can still help: note the trigger, target, comparison domain, interpretation, emotion, behavior that followed, and whether the episode produced useful information or only rank-based self-judgment. Patterns become easier to change when they are visible.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is social media envy normal?

Yes. Envy is a common human emotion, and experiencing it after an unfavorable online comparison does not by itself indicate a mental disorder. The relevant questions are how intense and persistent it is, what it leads you to do, and whether it contributes to meaningful distress or impairment.

Does Instagram cause low self-esteem?

That statement is too broad. Experimental evidence shows that exposure to upward comparison targets can produce small short-term declines in self-esteem and other self-evaluations on average. Meta-analytic evidence also shows substantial variation across studies and contexts. Platform use as a whole cannot be reduced to one effect.

Why do I envy people I actually like?

Envy and affection can coexist. You can care about a friend and still experience pain when the friend has an advantage that touches an important goal or insecurity. The emotion concerns the self-other gap; it does not automatically imply hostility toward the person.

Why can a friend’s success feel worse than a celebrity’s success?

Similarity can make a comparison more self-relevant. A peer may feel like a more meaningful benchmark for what someone with your age, background, profession, or opportunities “should” be achieving. That perceived comparability can make the gap feel more diagnostic.

Can social media envy ever motivate me?

Yes, sometimes. Upward comparison can produce inspiration or benign envy when the target feels attainable or provides a useful model. Experimental work on Instagram has shown a pathway from upward comparison to inspiration and brief improvements in well-being. The outcome depends on appraisal and context.

Is envy the same as social comparison?

No. Social comparison is the evaluative process; envy is one possible emotional response. You can compare upward and feel admiration, inspiration, discouragement, indifference, or envy. You can also experience envy without consciously narrating the comparison process.

Is envy the same as jealousy?

No. Envy typically concerns another person’s advantage that you want; jealousy typically concerns a valued relationship threatened by a rival or third party. Online environments can evoke both, but they belong to different psychological mechanisms.

Should I unfollow everyone who makes me envious?

Not necessarily. Some comparisons are informative or motivating. A targeted approach is more useful: notice accounts and contexts that repeatedly produce unhelpful contrast, resentment, or self-devaluation, and adjust those exposures while preserving relationships, information, and communities that are valuable.

Will reducing screen time cure social media envy?

There is no universal screen-time cutoff or guaranteed cure. Less exposure can reduce opportunities for a particular trigger, but the more specific mechanism is comparison: who you see, what you compare, how relevant the domain is, how you interpret the gap, and what you do afterward.

The Bottom Line

Social media envy is best understood as a specific emotional response within a broader social-comparison process. Strong evidence shows that experimentally induced upward comparison can worsen immediate self-evaluations on average, and current meta-analytic evidence links frequent upward comparison with lower self-esteem, lower well-being, and greater negative emotion. At the same time, critical reviews and naturalistic studies show meaningful heterogeneity, reciprocal pathways, and situations in which upward comparison becomes inspiration rather than distress.

The practical implication is precise: do not diagnose yourself from a feeling, do not use screen time as a substitute for mechanism, and do not assume that another person’s post has a fixed psychological effect. Look at the comparison itself—its target, domain, meaning, frequency, context, and consequence. That is where the evidence is strongest and where change is most actionable.

References

Burnell, K., Trekels, J., Prinstein, M. J., & Telzer, E. H. (2024). Adolescents’ social comparison on social media: Links with momentary self-evaluations. Affective Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-024-00240-6

Carraturo, F., Di Perna, T., Giannicola, V., Nacchia, M. A., Pepe, M., Muzii, B., Bottone, M., Sperandeo, R., Bochicchio, V., Maldonato, N. M., & Scandurra, C. (2023). Envy, social comparison, and depression on social networking sites: A systematic review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020027

Chen, Y. A., & Toma, C. L. (2026). The combined well-being effects of social media activities: How self-affirmation can buffer against upward social comparisons on Instagram. Human Communication Research, 52(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaf022

Lei, Y., Hu, S., Sun, Y., & Zheng, L. (2026). “Looking up” linked to feeling down: A meta-analysis of online upward social comparison and psychological maladjustment. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1825169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1825169

McComb, C. A., Vanman, E. J., & Tobin, S. J. (2023). A meta-analysis of the effects of social media exposure to upward comparison targets on self-evaluations and emotions. Media Psychology, 26(5), 612–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2023.2180647

Meier, A., Gilbert, A., Börner, S., & Possler, D. (2020). Instagram inspiration: How upward comparison on social network sites can contribute to well-being. Journal of Communication, 70(5), 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa025

Meier, A., & Johnson, B. K. (2022). Social comparison and envy on social media: A critical review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101302

Midgley, C., Thai, S., Lockwood, P., Kovacheff, C., & Page-Gould, E. (2021). When every day is a high school reunion: Social media comparisons and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000336

Valkenburg, P. M. (2022). Social media use and well-being: What we know and what we need to know. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.006

Verduyn, P., Lee, D. S., Park, J., Shablack, H., Orvell, A., Bayer, J., Ybarra, O., Jonides, J., & Kross, E. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000057

Wang, J.-L., Wang, H.-Z., Gaskin, J., & Hawk, S. (2017). The mediating roles of upward social comparison and self-esteem and the moderating role of social comparison orientation in the association between social networking site usage and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00771

Psychological Encyclopedia