Social Anxiety Disorder ICD-11 Diagnostic Requirements Explained
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 1, 2026 · Editorial Policy
In ICD-11, social anxiety disorder is coded 6B04. The diagnosis requires a persistent pattern of marked fear or anxiety in one or more social situations, a central concern about negative evaluation by other people, consistent avoidance or intensely anxious endurance of those situations, and clinically significant distress or impairment. The World Health Organization's 2024 ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements is the primary source for these requirements. ICD-11 describes an extended duration such as at least several months; it does not use the DSM-5-TR's fixed six-month duration threshold.
The diagnosis is not a label for ordinary shyness, nervousness before a presentation, a high score on a questionnaire, or any episode of anxiety in public. ICD-11 asks what the person fears will happen, how consistently the pattern occurs, whether the fear is excessive in the person's cultural and environmental context, what the person avoids or endures, how long the pattern has persisted, how much it affects life, and whether another condition explains the presentation better. For the wider classification context, see ICD-11 Anxiety Classification: Anxiety or Fear-Related Disorders.
For the broader clinical entity—symptoms, causes, diagnosis, and treatment—see Social Anxiety Disorder: Symptoms, Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment. This page remains the dedicated ICD-11 diagnostic-requirements owner.
ICD-11 social anxiety disorder in one sentence
ICD-11 social anxiety disorder is a persistent fear-and-avoidance pattern in which social interaction, observation, or performance situations provoke marked anxiety because the person expects that their behavior, appearance, or visible anxiety symptoms will be judged negatively by other people, with the pattern severe enough to cause significant distress or impairment.
What ICD-11 means by diagnostic requirements
The WHO CDDR is a clinician-facing diagnostic manual rather than a self-administered checklist. It was designed to support accurate and reliable diagnosis across health systems and cultural settings. Kogan and colleagues described the ICD-11 anxiety and fear-related framework as emphasizing essential features and the focus of apprehension: the particular feared outcome or situation that organizes the person's anxiety and avoidance.
That design has empirical support as a usable classification framework. In the ICD-11 developmental field study, 339 clinicians assessed 1,806 patients across 28 centers in 13 countries; inter-diagnostician reliability for social anxiety disorder was reported at 0.88, the highest value among the diagnoses listed in that study. Reed and colleagues cautioned against treating comparisons with older field trials as direct statistical tests, but the result supports the practical reliability of the ICD-11 diagnostic guidance.
A separate global case-controlled study involving 1,840 mental health professionals found ICD-11 anxiety and fear-related guidelines generally equivalent or superior to ICD-10 in diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. The investigators also found that boundary cases between disorder and normality remained an area where clinical judgment mattered. See Rebello and colleagues.
The essential ICD-11 requirements for social anxiety disorder
1. Marked fear or anxiety occurs consistently in one or more social situations
The first requirement is a recurring, marked level of fear or anxiety tied to social situations. ICD-11 examples span three broad forms: direct social interaction, doing something while being observed, and performing in front of other people. A conversation, meeting unfamiliar people, eating or drinking while watched, answering a question in a group, interviewing for a job, or giving a speech can all belong to the diagnostic territory.
The wording matters. A person does not need to fear every social situation. One or more social situations can be sufficient when the rest of the diagnostic requirements are also met. At the same time, a single unpleasant social event or occasional discomfort does not establish the disorder. The pattern has to be consistent, persistent, excessive in context, and clinically significant.
The visible setting alone cannot establish the diagnosis. Two people may both avoid a crowded restaurant for entirely different reasons: one may fear being watched while eating and judged negatively, another may fear having a panic-like episode and being unable to escape. The first pattern points toward social-evaluation fear; the second can point toward agoraphobic apprehension. ICD-11 therefore treats the meaning of the feared situation as diagnostically central.
2. The focus of apprehension is negative evaluation by other people
The defining cognitive focus is the expectation that other people will evaluate the person negatively. The feared outcome can involve humiliation or embarrassment, rejection, or being perceived as offensive. The person may fear saying something foolish, appearing incompetent, blushing, trembling, sweating, having a shaky voice, freezing, looking visibly anxious, or behaving in a way they expect others will judge.
This emphasis on negative evaluation is a major organizing principle of the ICD-11 formulation. Kogan et al. describe social anxiety disorder as involving a broader class of social situations united by a common focus of apprehension rather than by one fixed external stimulus.
The feared judgment can concern showing anxiety symptoms rather than making a social mistake. Someone who says, “I am not afraid of the meeting itself; I am afraid they will see me blush and think I am weak,” may be describing the same negative-evaluation mechanism. ICD-11 specifically recognizes that people sometimes first report physical concerns such as blushing, sweating, or trembling before they articulate the underlying fear of evaluation.
3. Relevant social situations are avoided or endured with intense fear or anxiety
Avoidance is one common expression of social anxiety disorder, but total avoidance is not required. Some people stop attending gatherings, avoid speaking in meetings, turn down interviews, skip classes, refuse to eat around others, or limit contact with unfamiliar people. Others continue entering feared situations but do so with intense anxiety.
Subtle avoidance can matter clinically as much as obvious avoidance. A person may speak as little as possible, avoid eye contact, rehearse every sentence, sit where attention is least likely, arrive late to minimize interaction, communicate only by text, or rely on another person to handle social exchanges. These behaviors do not diagnose the disorder on their own, but they can reveal how much daily functioning is organized around the fear.
ICD-11 also recognizes that functioning can appear intact while requiring substantial additional effort. A person may still work, study, maintain relationships, or attend appointments while devoting extraordinary preparation, distress, or compensatory behavior to getting through social situations. Clinical assessment therefore looks beyond whether an activity technically happened.
4. The pattern is persistent rather than transient
ICD-11 requires symptoms to persist for an extended period rather than representing a short-lived reaction. The CDDR gives “at least several months” as an example of the expected time scale. This is intentionally different from converting the requirement into an exact day count or a rigid six-month cutoff.
The distinction is important because online summaries often import DSM wording into ICD-11. DSM-5-TR uses a six-month duration threshold for social anxiety disorder, while ICD-11 describes persistence over an extended period such as several months. Domschke and Zwanzger's ICD-10/ICD-11 taxonomy review explicitly notes the ICD-11 several-month duration formulation.
A brief period of self-consciousness after a humiliating event, a few anxious presentations during a demanding semester, or a temporary increase in social fear during a major life transition can be clinically important without automatically meeting the ICD-11 disorder threshold. Duration is evaluated together with persistence, context, severity, and functional consequences.
5. Another mental disorder must not explain the presentation better
ICD-11 requires clinicians to ask whether the symptoms are better accounted for by another mental disorder. The CDDR explicitly names agoraphobia, body dysmorphic disorder, and olfactory reference disorder as examples at the essential-features level, then provides a broader differential-diagnosis section. The same outward behavior—avoiding people, leaving events, refusing to speak, staying home—can arise from very different mechanisms.
This is why diagnosis is a formulation rather than symptom matching. The English Hub's broader anxiety differential-diagnosis guide explains how clinicians distinguish anxiety disorders from neighboring psychiatric and medical explanations without treating anxiety as the default cause of every symptom.
6. The pattern causes significant distress or significant impairment
The final essential threshold is clinical significance. Social fear and avoidance must produce significant distress about persistent anxiety symptoms or significant impairment in important areas of life, including personal, family, social, educational, occupational, or other functioning. If the person maintains functioning, ICD-11 allows the threshold to be met when doing so requires significant additional effort.
This threshold separates a clinical disorder from common social discomfort. A person can be shy, prefer small groups, dislike public speaking, or feel self-conscious in unfamiliar settings without having social anxiety disorder. The diagnostic question is whether the persistent fear-and-avoidance pattern is excessive in context and meaningfully constrains or burdens the person's life.
For a broader explanation of how distress, avoidance, persistence, and impairment distinguish normal anxiety from a clinical disorder, see Anxiety Disorder vs Normal Anxiety: Distress, Avoidance, and Impairment.
What ICD-11 does not require
ICD-11 does not require a fixed count of panic-like bodily symptoms for social anxiety disorder. That older style of symptom-count threshold is not part of the ICD-11 6B04 essential-features formulation. The diagnostic center of gravity is the social situation, negative-evaluation fear, avoidance or intensely anxious endurance, persistence, clinical significance, and differential diagnosis.
ICD-11 also does not require a person to have panic attacks. Panic can occur in social anxiety disorder, but it is not the defining feature. Nor does a panic attack automatically convert the presentation into panic disorder.
A questionnaire cutoff is not an ICD-11 diagnostic requirement. Measures such as the Social Phobia Inventory, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, or DSM-5 social-anxiety severity measure can quantify symptoms or support assessment, but a score does not establish 6B04 by itself.
ICD-11 does not require fear across all social domains. A clinically significant pattern can be limited to one or more social situations. It also does not reproduce the DSM-5-TR “performance only” specifier as a separate ICD-11 specifier.
Finally, insight that the fear is unreasonable is not framed as a separate required self-judgment. The CDDR notes that some people with social anxiety disorder may not themselves view the fear as excessive. Clinical judgment considers whether the fear, anxiety, or avoidance is disproportionate in the person's cultural and environmental circumstances.
Normal shyness, social anxiety, and social anxiety disorder are not the same thing
Social anxiety exists on a continuum of human experience. Many people become nervous when meeting new people, speaking in public, dating, interviewing, being observed, or risking criticism. Shyness is also a common temperament or personality characteristic. Neither is equivalent to a clinical diagnosis.
The WHO CDDR draws the threshold around persistence, excessiveness in context, and meaningful distress or impairment. This is consistent with the broader distinction between social anxiety as an experience and social anxiety disorder as a clinical pattern. A major review by Morrison and Heimberg likewise treats social anxiety and the disorder as related but distinguishable levels of phenomena.
Context can make an apparently strong fear understandable. A student who is being bullied may reasonably fear peer interactions. A worker in a genuinely hostile or discriminatory environment may anticipate negative treatment. A person learning a new language may feel unusually self-conscious in conversation. ICD-11 requires clinicians to judge the fear relative to the actual social environment rather than assuming that all avoidance reflects pathology.
Culture and environment are part of the diagnosis
ICD-11 explicitly asks clinicians to consider cultural norms and the person's specific environment when judging whether social fear is excessive. The same behavior can carry different meanings across communities, families, workplaces, schools, and social roles. A diagnostic threshold cannot be defined by one culture's preferred level of assertiveness, eye contact, public speaking, or social participation.
The CDDR also discusses culture-related presentations in which the feared negative evaluation centers on offending other people through one's gaze, facial expression, blushing, body odor, or other perceived social effects. These presentations illustrate why the content of the fear matters. Depending on the exact belief and broader clinical pattern, a presentation may fit social anxiety disorder or may be better explained by another diagnosis such as body dysmorphic disorder, olfactory reference disorder, or a delusional disorder.
Cultural formulation therefore protects against two errors at once: treating culturally normative reserve as a disorder, and overlooking disabling anxiety merely because reticence is culturally tolerated. The question remains whether fear and avoidance are excessive relative to the person's context and whether they cause significant distress or impairment.
Panic attacks can occur in social anxiety disorder
A panic attack is an episode, not a diagnosis by itself. In social anxiety disorder, acute surges of fear may occur when a person enters or anticipates a feared social or performance situation. ICD-11 allows the “with panic attacks” specifier to be used when panic attacks occur without a co-occurring panic disorder diagnosis.
The distinction depends on whether the attacks are tied to the social-anxiety context. If panic attacks occur exclusively in actual or anticipated social or performance situations, ICD-11 states that an additional panic disorder diagnosis is not warranted. If recurrent unexpected panic attacks also occur outside that cue-bound pattern and the separate diagnostic requirements are met, panic disorder may be diagnosed as well. See the Panic Disorder ICD-11 diagnostic-requirements article for the separate 6B01 territory.
For the mechanism-level contrast between fear of panic itself and fear of social judgment, see Panic Disorder vs Social Anxiety Disorder: Panic Fear vs Social Evaluation Fear.
ICD-11 differential diagnosis: what can look like social anxiety disorder?
Generalized anxiety disorder
In generalized anxiety disorder, worry spans multiple everyday domains such as work, relationships, health, finances, or other responsibilities. Social concerns can be part of GAD, but the worry is not organized primarily around negative evaluation in social situations. In social anxiety disorder, social scrutiny and anticipated negative judgment are the central focus.
The practical comparison is covered in GAD vs Social Anxiety Disorder: Broad Worry vs Social Evaluation Fear.
Panic disorder
Panic disorder is defined by recurrent unexpected panic attacks and their consequences, whereas social anxiety disorder can involve panic attacks that are expected because they occur in feared social situations. When panic is entirely cue-bound to social exposure, the social-anxiety formulation usually remains primary. Unexpected attacks outside social situations can justify assessing panic disorder separately.
Agoraphobia
The central distinction is the feared outcome. In social anxiety disorder, the person fears negative evaluation by other people. In agoraphobia, fear is organized around situations where escape may be difficult or help may be unavailable if a panic-like, incapacitating, or embarrassing physical event occurs. Embarrassment may appear in both disorders, but it plays a different role.
For the ICD-11 side of that distinction, see Agoraphobia ICD-11 Diagnostic Requirements Explained.
Specific phobia
Specific phobia usually centers on a circumscribed object or situation such as an animal, height, blood-injury context, or another specific stimulus. Social anxiety disorder centers on social or performance situations in which negative evaluation is feared. A person can have both diagnoses if each pattern independently meets its diagnostic requirements.
Selective mutism
Selective mutism is characterized by consistent failure to speak in particular situations despite speaking in others. Social anxiety can be prominent in selective mutism, and the disorders may co-occur, especially in younger people. The presence of silence in a specific setting therefore does not by itself establish either diagnosis; clinicians assess the speaking pattern, social fear, developmental history, language competence, and broader functioning.
Autism spectrum disorder
Autism and social anxiety can both be associated with reduced participation in social situations, but the mechanisms are not interchangeable. Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition involving persistent social-communication differences together with restricted, repetitive patterns or related neurodevelopmental features, whereas social anxiety disorder is organized around excessive fear of negative evaluation. Social anxiety can also occur in an autistic person, so the assessment asks whether a fear-driven anxiety pattern is present in addition to autistic traits rather than treating social withdrawal as self-explanatory.
Depressive disorders
Depression can involve social withdrawal, beliefs of inadequacy, low energy, loss of interest, and fear of failure or rejection. ICD-11 distinguishes this from social anxiety disorder when the social-avoidance pattern occurs mainly within a depressive episode rather than as a persistent negative-evaluation fear across social situations. Co-occurrence is possible when both diagnostic patterns are independently present.
Body dysmorphic disorder
In body dysmorphic disorder, the person's social avoidance or concern about judgment is organized around a perceived defect or flaw in appearance that is unnoticeable or slight to others. In social anxiety disorder, negative-evaluation fears are not restricted to that perceived appearance defect and can concern behavior, visible anxiety symptoms, performance, rejection, or other aspects of social evaluation.
Olfactory reference disorder
Olfactory reference disorder involves a persistent preoccupation with the belief that one is emitting an unpleasant body odor that other people do not perceive or consider slight. Social avoidance may follow, but the core concern is the perceived odor. Social anxiety disorder instead centers on a broader fear that one's behavior, appearance, or anxiety symptoms will be negatively evaluated.
Medical conditions and other mental disorders
A medical condition does not automatically rule out social anxiety disorder, and visible symptoms do not automatically prove it. Someone with tremor, speech changes, movement symptoms, skin symptoms, or another noticeable condition may understandably worry about how others respond. ICD-11 advises an additional social anxiety diagnosis only when the full requirements are met and the fear is persistent and excessive relative to the actual situation.
Likewise, social avoidance can occur in psychotic disorders, trauma-related conditions, substance-related states, neurodevelopmental conditions, and other psychiatric presentations. The diagnosis depends on the organizing mechanism and the complete clinical picture. New or unexplained physical symptoms should receive appropriate medical assessment rather than being attributed to anxiety solely because anxiety is present.
How clinicians assess ICD-11 social anxiety disorder
A clinical assessment usually begins with the person's own account of feared situations, anticipated consequences, avoidance, bodily symptoms, onset, duration, functional impact, and coping strategies. The clinician then tests competing explanations and comorbidities. The broader process is explained in How Is Anxiety Diagnosed? Assessment, History, and Differential Diagnosis.
Useful questions include: Which social situations trigger fear? What do you expect other people will think or do? Are you afraid of embarrassment, rejection, offending others, or showing visible anxiety? Do you avoid the situation, endure it with intense anxiety, or use subtle safety behaviors? How long has the pattern been present? What does it cost you at school, work, relationships, family life, or daily tasks?
Clinicians also ask whether the fear is proportionate to the actual environment. Bullying, discrimination, hostile workplaces, realistic public scrutiny, language barriers, and visible medical symptoms can all shape social concern. The task is to understand the actual risk and the person's response rather than judging the behavior in isolation.
In children and adolescents, assessment may include information from parents, caregivers, teachers, or other people who know the child across settings. Developmentally ordinary stranger anxiety, shyness, or reluctance in unfamiliar situations should not be converted into a disorder diagnosis. Social anxiety can become clearer as school and peer demands increase, but developmental context remains essential.
Screening and severity scales do not diagnose 6B04
Questionnaires can be useful for identifying symptoms, estimating severity, supporting a clinical interview, or tracking change over time. They answer a different question from diagnosis. A screening result indicates that further assessment may be useful; it does not establish that all ICD-11 diagnostic requirements are met.
The American Psychiatric Association publishes a disorder-specific social anxiety severity measure for adults and young people. Its existence illustrates the distinction between measuring symptom severity and assigning a formal diagnosis: severity measurement is one component of assessment, not a substitute for diagnostic formulation.
The same boundary applies to commonly used research and clinical instruments such as the Social Phobia Inventory and the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Different tools were designed for different purposes, populations, and settings. No single cutoff can answer the ICD-11 differential-diagnosis questions, cultural-context questions, impairment questions, or comorbidity questions on its own.
ICD-11 vs DSM-5-TR for social anxiety disorder
The two systems overlap substantially. Both center the diagnosis on strong fear or anxiety in social situations where scrutiny or evaluation may occur, avoidance or highly anxious endurance, persistence over time, and meaningful functional impact. First and colleagues describe ICD-11 and DSM-5 as closer overall than earlier generations of the two classifications while still differing in how diagnostic requirements are specified.
One practical difference is duration. ICD-11 uses an extended period such as at least several months. DSM-5-TR uses at least six months. The National Institute of Mental Health summarizes the DSM-style six-month threshold for its U.S. audience.
Another difference is specification. DSM-5 introduced a performance-only specifier for cases in which fear is restricted to speaking or performing in public. Heimberg and colleagues review this and other DSM-5 changes. ICD-11 does not use an equivalent performance-only specifier; its essential features already allow fear in one or more social situations, including performance situations.
Terminology has also converged. ICD-11 uses Social anxiety disorder as the diagnostic label. DSM-5-TR likewise uses Social Anxiety Disorder and removed the older parenthetical “Social Phobia,” as explained in the American Psychiatric Association's DSM-5-TR fact sheet. Historical and everyday sources may still use social phobia, but the modern diagnostic label in both systems is social anxiety disorder.
For the broader architecture rather than this disorder-specific comparison, see DSM-5-TR vs ICD-11 Anxiety Disorders: Key Classification Differences.
For the criterion-by-criterion American Psychiatric Association framework, see Social Anxiety Disorder DSM-5-TR Criteria Explained. Keeping the two pages separate prevents the ICD-11 “several months” formulation from being silently replaced by DSM-5-TR's six-month threshold.
ICD-10 to ICD-11: what changed for social anxiety disorder?
ICD-11 moved away from the ICD-10 arrangement that separated phobic anxiety disorders from other anxiety disorders. Social anxiety disorder now sits within the unified Anxiety or fear-related disorders grouping, alongside generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder, and selective mutism.
The newer formulation places greater weight on the focus of apprehension and removes the old ICD-10-style requirement for a minimum number of panic symptoms in social phobia. Domschke and Zwanzger describe this shift, including the stronger emphasis on fear of behaving or displaying anxiety symptoms in ways that may be negatively evaluated.
ICD-11 also broadens the forms that feared negative evaluation can take, including humiliation, embarrassment, rejection, or offending others. This improves the fit with culturally varied presentations while preserving the need to assess whether the fear is excessive in the person's actual sociocultural environment.
The reliability field study offers one empirical signal that the revised formulation is clinically usable: social anxiety disorder showed an inter-diagnostician reliability coefficient of 0.88 in the ICD-11 developmental field study, compared with a substantially lower value in the earlier ICD-10 field trial. Reed et al. explicitly caution that the studies should not be treated as a direct statistical comparison, but the change is consistent with the intended improvement in clinical clarity.
Children and adolescents
ICD-11 treats social anxiety disorder as a lifespan diagnosis. It should not be used to label developmentally ordinary stranger anxiety, shyness, or temporary reluctance around unfamiliar people. In young people, the clinician assesses whether fear and avoidance are excessive for developmental level, persist over time, and interfere significantly with school, friendships, family functioning, participation, or other important areas.
Social demands change with age, so the presentation can change as well. A younger child may show anxiety mainly around unfamiliar adults, whereas peer evaluation may become more prominent in adolescence. School refusal, withdrawal, minimal speech, poor eye contact, or reluctance to assert needs can occur, but none of these signs is specific enough to diagnose social anxiety disorder without the underlying negative-evaluation fear and the rest of the required pattern.
Collateral information can be especially useful when a young person has difficulty describing internal fears. Reports from parents, caregivers, teachers, or other observers can clarify whether the pattern appears across contexts, how long it has persisted, and how it affects functioning.
Why a diagnostic code is not a diagnosis
The code 6B04 is a classification label used after the diagnostic formulation has been made. Finding the code in a chart, insurance document, search result, or online code list does not tell a reader how the diagnosis was reached, whether a screening instrument was used, what differentials were considered, or whether the diagnosis is current.
Similarly, recognizing yourself in a description can be useful as a reason to seek assessment, but self-recognition is not equivalent to formal diagnosis. Social fear can occur in many contexts, and the same person can have more than one relevant condition. A clinician integrates symptom pattern, duration, impairment, development, culture, medical context, substance or medication factors when relevant, and co-occurring mental health conditions.
The broad Anxiety Disorders: Symptoms, Types, Diagnosis, and Treatment article maps where social anxiety disorder sits among the main anxiety and fear-related diagnoses without collapsing neighboring conditions into one category.
Diagnostic requirements describe how clinicians identify the disorder; they do not establish one universal cause. For the separate etiology intent, see What Causes Social Anxiety Disorder? Risk Factors, Learning, and Temperament.
Frequently asked questions
What is the ICD-11 code for social anxiety disorder?
The ICD-11 code is 6B04. It sits within the Anxiety or fear-related disorders grouping.
How long must social anxiety last in ICD-11?
ICD-11 requires the pattern to be persistent rather than transient and gives an extended period such as at least several months as the example. It does not state the DSM-5-TR's exact six-month threshold. Duration is considered together with severity, context, avoidance, distress, impairment, and differential diagnosis.
Is social anxiety disorder the same as being shy?
No. Shyness is a common personality or temperamental characteristic. Social anxiety disorder requires persistent, excessive fear or anxiety tied to social evaluation, avoidance or intensely anxious endurance, and significant distress or impairment. A shy person may function comfortably and have no clinical disorder.
Can you have social anxiety disorder without avoiding social situations?
Yes. ICD-11 allows for feared social situations to be endured with intense fear or anxiety rather than completely avoided. A person may also keep functioning only through substantial extra effort or subtle safety behaviors.
Can panic attacks happen with social anxiety disorder?
Yes. Panic attacks can occur in social anxiety disorder. If they occur only in feared social or performance situations, ICD-11 does not require a separate panic disorder diagnosis; the “with panic attacks” specifier may be used. Unexpected panic attacks outside the social-anxiety pattern may warrant a separate panic-disorder assessment.
Does ICD-11 require six months of symptoms?
No fixed six-month rule appears in the ICD-11 social anxiety disorder requirements. ICD-11 uses an extended period such as at least several months. Six months is the DSM-5-TR threshold, which is why mixing the two manuals can produce inaccurate online summaries.
Does a high SPIN or LSAS score mean I have social anxiety disorder?
No. A score can indicate symptom severity or the need for further assessment, depending on the instrument and setting. Formal diagnosis requires clinical assessment of the full diagnostic pattern, including persistence, impairment, context, and competing explanations.
Can social anxiety disorder be limited to public speaking or performance?
It can be clinically significant when fear is limited to one or more performance situations, provided the full ICD-11 requirements are met. ICD-11 does not create a separate performance-only specifier analogous to DSM-5-TR.
Can someone have social anxiety disorder and another anxiety disorder at the same time?
Yes. Anxiety and fear-related disorders can co-occur when each independent diagnostic pattern is present. The key is not to count the same symptom twice without considering its function. For example, panic attacks restricted to social situations can be part of social anxiety disorder, while recurrent unexpected attacks outside that pattern may support a separate panic disorder diagnosis.
Who can diagnose social anxiety disorder?
The exact professional scope depends on the health system and jurisdiction. In clinical practice, diagnosis is made by qualified health or mental health professionals who are authorized and trained to assess mental disorders. Online articles and questionnaires can provide education or screening information but do not replace that assessment.
When an assessment is worth considering
An assessment can be useful when fear of scrutiny or negative evaluation has persisted for months, repeatedly drives avoidance or intense distress, requires substantial effort to work around, or interferes with school, work, relationships, daily tasks, health care, or other important parts of life.
Assessment is also useful when the picture is unclear. Social withdrawal may reflect social anxiety, depression, autism, trauma-related symptoms, psychosis, a medical condition, substance effects, body-image concerns, odor-related preoccupation, panic-related fear, agoraphobic fear, or several of these at once. A careful differential formulation is more useful than choosing a label from a symptom list.
If physical symptoms are new, severe, unexplained, or medically concerning, appropriate medical evaluation matters. Palpitations, fainting, breathlessness, neurologic changes, tremor, or other physical symptoms should not be attributed to anxiety solely because they occur during stressful situations.
The central ICD-11 idea
The most important way to understand ICD-11 social anxiety disorder is as a pattern organized around feared negative evaluation. The person is not simply “anxious around people.” Social situations become threatening because the person expects humiliation, embarrassment, rejection, offense, or another form of negative judgment; avoidance or intensely anxious endurance follows; the pattern persists; and life is meaningfully burdened.
That focus-of-apprehension principle is what separates 6B04 from neighboring disorders that can produce similar outward behavior. It also explains why the diagnostic process must preserve normal shyness, culturally understandable reticence, realistic concerns, screening results, panic attacks, medical symptoms, and other disorders as distinct clinical possibilities rather than folding them automatically into social anxiety disorder.
Related Articles
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Social Anxiety Disorder — DSM-5-TR fact sheet.
Domschke, K., & Zwanzger, P. (2025). Taxonomy of anxiety disorders—a comparison of ICD-10 and ICD-11. Der Nervenarzt. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-025-01842-6
First, M. B., Gaebel, W., Maj, M., et al. (2021). An organization- and category-level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5. World Psychiatry, 20(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20825
Heimberg, R. G., Hofmann, S. G., Liebowitz, M. R., et al. (2014). Social anxiety disorder in DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 31(6), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22231
Kogan, C. S., Stein, D. J., Maj, M., First, M. B., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., & Reed, G. M. (2016). The Classification of Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders in the ICD-11. Depression and Anxiety, 33(12), 1141–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22530
Morrison, A. S., & Heimberg, R. G. (2013). Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185631
National Institute of Mental Health. Social Anxiety Disorder: What You Need to Know.
Rebello, T. J., Keeley, J. W., Kogan, C. S., et al. (2019). Anxiety and Fear-Related Disorders in the ICD-11: Results from a Global Case-controlled Field Study. Archives of Medical Research, 50(8), 490–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2019.12.012
Reed, G. M., Sharan, P., Rebello, T. J., et al. (2018). The ICD-11 developmental field study of reliability of diagnoses of high-burden mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 17(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20524
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Health Organization.