SCID-D Interview: Clinical Assessment of Dissociative Disorders
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Dissociation & Dissociative Disorders · Written by Artificial Sapiens
The Structured Clinical Interview for Dissociative Disorders, usually called the SCID-D, is a clinician-administered, semistructured diagnostic interview developed to investigate dissociative symptoms in depth. Its central purpose is to help a trained professional determine whether reported experiences reflect a dissociative disorder, another clinical condition, overlapping conditions, or a presentation that requires further assessment. It examines five domains: amnesia, depersonalization, derealization, identity confusion, and identity alteration. The original instrument and its research lineage are described by Steinberg, Rounsaville, and Cicchetti.
The practical distinction is between describing an experience and establishing its clinical significance. A memory lapse, an episode of feeling unreal, or a sense of disconnection can arise in many circumstances. A SCID-D assessment considers the pattern, severity, duration, context, functional consequences, alternative explanations, and consistency of information. Its findings support a clinical formulation rather than replacing professional judgment. The American Psychiatric Association overview outlines the range of symptoms associated with dissociative disorders.
What Is the SCID-D Interview?
SCID-D stands for Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Dissociative Disorders. Developed by psychiatrist Marlene Steinberg and colleagues, it uses organized prompts and clinician follow-up questions to assess symptom patterns more systematically than a brief unstructured conversation. Versions have evolved alongside diagnostic classifications. The published literature refers to the original SCID-D, the revised SCID-D-R, and a later SCID-D-5 edition. The relevant edition, language adaptation, and diagnostic system should be identified in any clinical report.
A semistructured interview combines a standardized framework with clinical inquiry. The interviewer can clarify what the person means, request examples, investigate frequency and consequences, and consider contradictory or incomplete accounts. This flexibility matters because descriptions such as 'I lost time' or 'I felt outside my body' carry different meanings across people and conditions. A systematic rating does not by itself establish the cause of a symptom.
The SCID-D belongs to the family of clinician-administered assessments. It should not be confused with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Clinical Version (SCID-5-CV), a broader diagnostic interview, or with online dissociation quizzes. The SCID-D focuses particularly on dissociative phenomenology and differential diagnosis. Steinberg and Hall also described its possible role in treatment planning and feedback.
The Five Dissociative Symptom Domains
The same five broad domains have remained central across the instrument's history, although the criteria used to assign diagnoses have changed. These domains provide an organized clinical description; they do not constitute five independently diagnosable disorders. The original instrument report and a subsequent meta-analysis identify the domains explicitly.
1. Dissociative amnesia
The clinician examines clinically significant gaps in the recall of personal events or autobiographical information, including reported episodes of lost time. The questions explore what is missing, when gaps occurred, what other people observed, and how the information was later reconstructed. Ordinary forgetting, impaired attention, sleep-related confusion, intoxication, neurological disease, medications, brain injury, and other memory disorders require consideration. A reported gap cannot on its own establish dissociative amnesia or reveal that a particular traumatic event occurred.
2. Depersonalization
Depersonalization refers to experiences of detachment from one's own body, thoughts, emotions, actions, or sense of self. People may describe observing themselves from a distance, feeling automated, or finding their emotional responses strangely unfamiliar. Clinical assessment explores insight, distress, persistence, context, panic symptoms, substance exposure, and other possible causes. The subjective quality and the preservation of reality testing are relevant to the differential with primary psychotic disorders. For a related clinical perspective, see How Are Dissociative Disorders Diagnosed? Interviews and Differential Diagnosis.
3. Derealization
Derealization concerns an altered sense of the external environment, such as surroundings seeming dreamlike, distant, flat, artificial, or unfamiliar. The clinician asks how the person interprets the experience, what triggers it, and whether it co-occurs with panic, anxiety, depersonalization, sleep deprivation, migraine, substance effects, or other medical conditions. A feeling that the world is unreal differs clinically from a fixed delusional conviction about the world.
4. Identity confusion
Identity confusion involves uncertainty or conflict about one's sense of identity that exceeds ordinary questioning about roles, preferences, relationships, or development. Interviewers explore continuity of personal experience, reported shifts, associated distress, and context. Identity concerns are not inherently dissociative. Developmental transitions, cultural expectations, depression, trauma-related symptoms, personality functioning, and neurodevelopmental differences may influence the person's account.
5. Identity alteration
Identity alteration refers to reported discontinuities or changes in experienced identity, sense of agency, or patterns of behavior. An interviewer examines observable and subjective phenomena, recall across episodes, contextual triggers, and corroborating information where available and appropriate. Such reports warrant careful differential assessment. Dramatic behavioral change, an online account of 'alters,' or a single observed shift does not establish dissociative identity disorder (DID).
What Happens During a SCID-D Assessment?
Referral and initial clinical history
The assessment usually begins with a clinician clarifying the referral question and the person's chief concerns. A focused history addresses symptoms, onset, prior evaluations, sleep, current medication, substance exposure, physical health, neurological symptoms, psychiatric treatment, functional difficulties, and relevant social or cultural context. Some settings first use a broader diagnostic interview or screening questionnaire, while others incorporate SCID-D directly into specialist evaluation.
The interviewer also evaluates urgent concerns as clinically indicated, including acute confusion, major changes in functioning, suicide risk, self-harm, ongoing violence, and potential medical emergencies. A person with a new seizure-like event, recent head injury, intoxication, abrupt disorientation, or new neurological deficit needs appropriate medical assessment. Interviewing about dissociation must not delay emergency evaluation.
Systematic exploration of the five domains
The interviewer proceeds through the SCID-D's symptom domains, asking about real-life examples, time course, frequency, severity, distress, and impairments. Follow-up questions can clarify whether someone describes an actual autobiographical memory gap, a subjective sense of lost time, fluctuating attention, or information learned later from another source. The clinical goal is precise description, not encouraging the person to endorse a particular diagnosis.
Some experiences are difficult to put into words. A person may need breaks or ask for a question to be restated. It is appropriate to say 'I don't know,' distinguish memory from inference, or describe uncertainty. A conscientious interviewer avoids leading explanations and documents the account faithfully, including ambiguity.
Differential assessment and synthesis
The clinician brings together symptom-domain findings with observed functioning, diagnostic criteria, comorbid symptoms, medical information, and, where ethically appropriate and with consent, relevant collateral history. A specialist may recommend further psychiatric assessment, neurological evaluation, medication review, sleep evaluation, or longitudinal follow-up. The SCID-D can contribute substantially, while the final conclusion depends on all available evidence.
Feedback, next steps, and treatment planning
At the end of the evaluation or in a later feedback appointment, a clinician may explain the provisional or final diagnostic formulation, remaining uncertainties, safety concerns, and recommended follow-up. SCID-D information can inform treatment planning by identifying which symptoms are most disruptive. The original treatment-planning discussion describes this clinical role; it is not evidence that the interview itself treats a dissociative disorder.
Who Administers the SCID-D?
SCID-D administration is intended for appropriately trained mental health clinicians or qualified researchers operating within their scope of practice, often psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, and specialist assessors. The instrument requires skill in diagnostic interviewing, phenomenological clarification, differential diagnosis, cultural interpretation, and risk assessment. Training and access arrangements vary by institution, jurisdiction, edition, and language.
A therapist's familiarity with dissociation alone does not guarantee competence in a particular edition of SCID-D. Before booking, patients can ask whether the professional has training and experience with the SCID-D, which edition they use, whether the assessment includes differential diagnosis and written feedback, and whether coordination with existing care is possible.
How Long Does a SCID-D Interview Take?
The time required varies with the edition, assessment setting, breadth of symptoms, clinical complexity, need for breaks, and whether related evaluations are combined. It may involve an extended clinical appointment or more than one session. No single advertised duration guarantees a complete assessment. A provider should explain the expected appointment structure and costs before the interview.
An assessment can also remain inconclusive after a full interview. When histories are incomplete or symptoms may have medical, neurological, substance-related, or other psychiatric explanations, clinicians may need additional records, observation across time, or consultation before assigning a diagnosis.
Which Diagnoses Can the SCID-D Help Assess?
The symptom profile is interpreted using the edition's supported diagnostic framework, the patient's clinical context, and the relevant manual. In DSM-5-TR, dissociative disorders include DID, dissociative amnesia, depersonalization/derealization disorder, other specified dissociative disorder (OSDD), and unspecified dissociative disorder. ICD-11 uses a related but differently organized classification, including partial dissociative identity disorder and separately identified trance disorders. The WHO's 2024 clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements provide the authoritative ICD-11 clinical framework.
Dissociative identity disorder (DID)
DID assessment requires careful examination of identity discontinuity, significant memory-related features, impairment or distress, cultural context, and exclusions. SCID-D identity-domain information may be particularly relevant. A diagnostic conclusion also requires consideration of competing causes and current DSM or ICD criteria. The SCID-D can guide the inquiry; neither self-identification with DID terminology nor elevated questionnaire scores are sufficient.
Dissociative amnesia
For dissociative amnesia, the key question is the nature and extent of autobiographical memory gaps after other explanations have been examined. The SCID-D addresses amnesia as a symptom dimension, which should be interpreted within a broader history. The content of a recovered or newly reported memory should never be treated as automatically verified by an interview outcome.
Depersonalization-derealization disorder
Persistent or recurrent detachment experiences may warrant an assessment for depersonalization-derealization disorder when associated with significant distress or impairment. Clinicians evaluate insight and other conditions capable of producing similar experiences, including anxiety-related episodes, substance effects, neurological disease, and psychosis. The presence of depersonalization or derealization alone does not establish the disorder.
OSDD, unspecified presentations, and ICD-11 partial DID
Some clinically significant presentations do not meet the full criteria for DID or another named DSM dissociative disorder and may be classified under OSDD or unspecified dissociative disorder depending on the circumstances. ICD-11 partial DID is a defined diagnosis within that classification rather than a direct synonym for DSM OSDD. A competent report makes clear which classification is being used, what diagnostic criteria are met, and where uncertainty remains.
Under ICD-11, dissociative neurological symptom disorder, trance disorder, possession trance disorder, and other categories warrant context-specific attention. Culturally sanctioned practices must be distinguished from involuntary, impairing clinical symptoms. The SCID-D's modern adaptation has been studied for DSM-5 and ICD-11 diagnostic mapping, while mapping decisions still require clinical understanding of the different systems.
SCID-D vs DES-II, MID, and Other Assessment Tools
A diagnostic interview versus a screening questionnaire
The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES or DES-II) is a self-report measure of dissociative experiences. It can highlight areas requiring further evaluation but does not diagnose DID, dissociative amnesia, or another dissociative disorder by a score alone. The original DES screening comparison study used SCID-D as a diagnostic reference and expressly recommended further evaluation of patients identified as potentially high risk.
The Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation (MID) is a longer self-report measure designed to assess dissociative phenomena in more detail. Other instruments focus on depersonalization, dissociative states, or particular populations. The choice depends on the clinical question, validation population, language, feasibility, and training. Self-report inventories can provide useful information before or during a clinical interview but cannot substitute for a complete differential diagnosis.
A 2025 systematic review of dissociation instruments identified substantial variation in measurement quality, construct coverage, and validation. The review emphasized the comparatively strong evidence for the DES in trait dissociation and for particular measures in specialized domains, while calling for improved validation. Findings about a questionnaire's psychometric properties should not be transferred automatically to the diagnostic accuracy of SCID-D or vice versa.
SCID-D versus a general psychiatric interview
A general psychiatric assessment evaluates mood, psychotic experiences, trauma-related conditions, attention, substance use, sleep, neurological issues, and overall functioning. The SCID-D adds structured depth specifically for dissociative symptoms. It is often most useful as part of a wider assessment pathway, particularly when diagnostic uncertainty persists or treatment decisions depend on more precise differentiation.
What Does the Research Say About SCID-D Reliability and Validity?
Foundational development and early testing
The foundational 1990 study introduced the five-domain approach and reported favorable preliminary reliability and discriminant validity in a small study of 48 participants. Early results supported further development and systematic use; they could not establish universal accuracy in every clinical population.
The 15-study SCID-D meta-analysis
A 2021 meta-analysis by Mychailyszyn and colleagues pooled 15 empirical studies comparing SCID-D interview findings in dissociative and comparison populations. The overall interview score and each of the five symptom-domain ratings differentiated the groups. The reported overall standardized effect size was 3.12; amnesia and identity alteration were among particularly discriminating domains. This is evidence for between-group differentiation within the studied samples.
A large between-group effect is not the probability that any one patient has DID, a general-population sensitivity estimate, or proof of identical performance across every clinician and setting. The included studies differed in recruitment, diagnostic mix, comparison groups, and versions of the interview. Some populations in this research were already selected for severe dissociation. A diagnostic interview remains dependent on the quality of its administration and the relevance of the validation sample.
Evidence for later editions and translations
A 2022 French-language validation of the revised SCID-D for DSM-5 and ICD-11 studied 49 people: 20 with a dissociative disorder, 19 with another psychiatric disorder, and 10 healthy controls. It reported 96% agreement between raters on classification as dissociative versus nondissociative in that sample and favorable interrater and convergent validity. These findings support that specific adaptation under its study conditions, while the modest sample limits the precision and generalizability of the estimates.
A Turkish validation study also reported promising psychometric findings while warning against generalization beyond its predominantly female, highly symptomatic sample. The cross-language evidence is useful, but translation, cultural context, interviewer experience, and local diagnostic practices remain part of validity. It is methodologically unsound to assume a translation has identical performance without relevant testing.
What validity studies do not settle
Studies showing that SCID-D differentiates selected clinical groups do not prove a particular causal theory of dissociation, independently authenticate remembered events, establish the origin of identity experiences, or eliminate every possibility of response bias. Research on dissociation spans trauma-focused, sociocognitive, and broader transdiagnostic frameworks; a 2022 critical review discusses the competing models and mechanisms. Diagnostic validity and etiological explanation are separate questions.
Differential Diagnosis: What Must Clinicians Rule Out?
Psychosis and schizophrenia-spectrum conditions
Dissociation, voice-hearing phenomena, unusual subjective experiences, and thought disorganization may be reported in more than one diagnostic category. Clinicians explore the nature of perceptual experiences, beliefs, insight, reality testing, cognitive functioning, disorganization, and the overall course of illness. A comparative SCID-D study involving schizophrenia-spectrum referrals identified group differences in dissociative symptom ratings, but no single symptom can settle the individual differential diagnosis.
Panic, anxiety, PTSD, and trauma-related symptoms
Depersonalization and derealization can occur during panic episodes. PTSD can involve dissociative symptoms and has its own diagnostic criteria and treatment pathway. A 1993 SCID-D PTSD study demonstrated higher dissociative-domain scores among veterans with PTSD than comparison veterans, showing how dissociative symptoms can occur beyond primary dissociative disorders. Clinical context, recurrence, full symptom criteria, and impairment help determine classification.
ADHD, sleep, memory, and neurological conditions
Inattention, ordinary absorption, sleep loss, parasomnias, migraines, seizure disorders, brain injury, medication effects, and substance intoxication can each produce experiences described as 'spacing out' or losing time. The evaluation should clarify whether awareness, recall, perception, or executive attention was altered and whether medical investigation is indicated. Psychological explanations should never substitute for evaluation of concerning neurological signs.
Borderline personality disorder and functional neurological symptoms
Disruptions in self-experience, stress-linked dissociation, affective instability, and complex trauma histories can be found in several conditions. An assessment evaluates longitudinal personality functioning and broader criteria rather than assuming DID from identity concerns. Functional neurological symptoms or seizure-like events may call for neurological and specialist assessment. The respective diagnostic domains have distinct canonical clinical owners in this encyclopedia.
Culture, deliberate presentation, and uncertainty
Religious or cultural descriptions of trance and possession should be understood in their cultural and relational context. Voluntary, expected, and non-impairing practices are not equivalent to a dissociative disorder. Where inconsistencies or possible intentionally produced symptoms arise, clinicians should investigate without presuming deceit or using any single questionnaire pattern as proof. External incentives, misunderstandings, and the clinical setting may all affect information quality.
Trauma, Memory, Suggestibility, and Interview Safety
Many dissociative disorders are associated with adverse experiences, but dissociative symptoms do not establish that trauma occurred, and trauma is not required to explain every dissociative experience. The interview should assess history without encouraging a predetermined causal narrative. Exploring symptoms sensitively can be clinically important while keeping the distinction between personally experienced recollection, inference, independently documented history, and uncertainty.
A diagnosis does not authenticate the content of autobiographical memories. Recollections that arise during treatment or after prompting require the same careful evidentiary distinction as any other memory report. Therapists should avoid techniques that pressure patients to retrieve alleged hidden events or treat vividness as confirmation. Research on hypnotic suggestibility in dissociative and related disorders finds group-level associations and heterogeneity, which reinforce the importance of non-leading assessment rather than establishing that any given account is false or true.
A well-conducted interview informs patients of its purpose, seeks consent, allows breaks, respects refusal to answer particular questions, and avoids unnecessary destabilization. It attends to the patient's current capacity for reflection, distress tolerance, cultural frame, and safety. A supportive setting improves the likelihood of obtaining a clinically useful description.
Can SCID-D Diagnose DID With Certainty?
The SCID-D can contribute strong structured evidence to the evaluation of DID when administered and interpreted by a competent clinician. Published studies support discrimination between selected dissociative and nondissociative populations. Individual diagnostic confidence depends on interview quality, suitable criteria, the full clinical history, differential assessment, and sometimes longitudinal observation. The tool is not infallible, and no score, symptom vignette, recorded 'switch,' or internet checklist can replace a clinical assessment.
A diagnosis can be provisional. It may change after medical testing, new history, or observation of symptoms over time. Patients can request an explanation of the criteria applied and seek a qualified second opinion if the formulation remains unclear.
Does the SCID-D Interview Provide Treatment?
SCID-D is an assessment instrument rather than a psychotherapy technique. Its findings may help a clinician select treatment priorities, identify comorbid symptoms, and coordinate referrals. Treatment of dissociative symptoms varies with the condition and person and may address safety, daily functioning, emotional regulation, co-occurring conditions, and appropriate psychological interventions. The ISSTD adult DID guidelines offer specialist consensus guidance while acknowledging the need for clinical judgment.
Treatment evidence differs in quality across dissociative diagnoses and interventions. A strong interview validation study is not a randomized treatment trial. Medication may be indicated for a co-occurring condition, but a dissociative-disorder diagnosis alone does not establish that a particular medication will directly treat dissociation. Patients should discuss benefits, side effects, and alternatives with their treating professional.
Preparing for the Appointment: Practical Guidance
Before an assessment, it can help to note specific episodes in everyday language: what happened, approximately when, how long it lasted, what you remember, whether other people noticed anything, and how it affected work, school, relationships, or safety. Record uncertainty as uncertainty. Relevant medication lists, prior clinical reports, sleep problems, substance exposure, and medical information can help the clinician consider differential causes.
You can ask about the interview's purpose, professional qualifications, edition, planned duration, financial arrangements, confidentiality and its limits, whether a written report will be provided, and how findings will be shared with your treating clinician. Ask whether accommodations are possible for disability, language, sensory differences, fatigue, or anxiety during extended assessment.
There is no need to study the instrument's questions, rehearse a symptom narrative, or produce a polished account of identity experiences. Accurate assessment depends on the person's own descriptions, including mundane details and uncertainty. A patient can ask for a pause, clarify terminology, decline a question, or request follow-up.
Understanding Your Results and Next Steps
A report may document the intensity of symptoms in the five domains, whether evidence supports one or more dissociative diagnoses, what criteria were used, and what alternatives remain under consideration. Some conclusions may recommend additional testing or follow-up instead of a categorical diagnosis. The result should be interpreted within the full assessment and shared in a way that supports informed treatment decisions.
If you disagree with a conclusion, ask which findings supported it, what criteria were applied, whether medical differentials were considered, and what further evidence could clarify the question. An unexplained label is a poor substitute for a usable clinical formulation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the SCID-D a test I can take online?
The SCID-D is designed as a clinician-administered semistructured interview. Internet questionnaires and unofficial question lists cannot reproduce its clinical interpretation, differential diagnosis, or validity evidence.
What does SCID-D stand for?
It stands for Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Dissociative Disorders. The label encompasses an instrument family that has been revised across DSM editions and studied in multiple languages.
Is SCID-D the same as SCID-5?
No. The SCID-D is specifically focused on dissociative phenomena. A general SCID-5 interview serves broader DSM diagnostic purposes; the two instruments have different scopes.
Does a high SCID-D score automatically mean DID?
No. Symptom-domain ratings and any total score must be interpreted by a clinician alongside formal criteria, medical and psychiatric differentials, impairment, context, and the interview version.
Can SCID-D distinguish DID from schizophrenia?
It can contribute useful structured information to that differential. Research has compared the groups, but the complete clinical assessment remains necessary, particularly when psychotic and dissociative experiences overlap.
Can SCID-D diagnose dissociative amnesia?
It can assess dissociative amnesia symptoms and inform the diagnosis after other explanations have been evaluated. The interview does not verify the historical accuracy of reported memories.
Can it assess depersonalization or derealization without DID?
Yes. Depersonalization and derealization are two of its central symptom domains. A clinician may examine them even when DID is not suspected.
Does everyone with dissociation need a SCID-D interview?
No. Temporary, non-impairing dissociative experiences do not automatically require specialist testing. Referral depends on severity, persistence, impairment, diagnostic uncertainty, and other clinical factors.
How accurate is the SCID-D?
Published validation studies and a 15-study meta-analysis support its ability to differentiate selected clinical groups. They do not establish one universal accuracy percentage for all patients, settings, cultures, or versions.
Is SCID-D valid for teenagers?
Adolescent clinical use has been described, including a three-case study, but three cases cannot establish broad pediatric diagnostic accuracy. Developmentally appropriate specialist assessment and age-specific evidence remain important.
Does the interview confirm that I experienced trauma?
No. Symptom assessment does not establish the cause of symptoms or independently corroborate autobiographical events.
How can I find a trained SCID-D assessor?
Ask a licensed mental health professional, specialist dissociation service, hospital-based clinical psychology or psychiatry department, or referral provider about instrument-specific experience, relevant training, diagnostic evaluation, and clinical follow-up. Availability differs across locations.
What if I become distressed during the interview?
Tell the interviewer, ask for a pause or break, and discuss how to proceed safely. A clinically responsible assessment should accommodate distress and consider whether the interview should continue or be rescheduled.
Will the interview change my treatment?
It may refine the diagnostic formulation, reveal co-occurring conditions, or guide referrals and planning. It is an assessment; any treatment decisions should be discussed with the treating clinician.
Related Articles
DID vs Borderline Personality Disorder: Symptoms and Diagnostic Differences — diagnostic overlap, clinical differences, and careful differential assessment.
Childhood Trauma and Dissociation: What Is the Connection? — the evidence for associations with adverse childhood experiences.
Trauma and Memory: Intrusive Memories, Gaps, and Evidence — how memory symptoms and evidentiary uncertainty are approached.
Neurosis vs Dissociation: Historical Concepts and Modern Diagnostic Categories — historical language and modern classification.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing. APA dissociative disorders overview.
International Society for the Study of Trauma and Dissociation. (2011). Guidelines for treating dissociative identity disorder in adults, third revision. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 12(2), 115–187. Official guideline.
Mychailyszyn, M. P., Brand, B. L., Webermann, A. R., Şar, V., & Draijer, N. (2021). Differentiating dissociative from non-dissociative disorders: A meta-analysis of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D). Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 22(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2020.1760169.
Piedfort-Marin, O., et al. (2022). Reliability and validity study of the French-language version of the SCID-D semi-structured clinical interview for diagnosing DSM-5 and ICD-11 dissociative disorders. Annales Médico-psychologiques, 180(6), S1–S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2020.12.012.
Steinberg, M., Cicchetti, D., Buchanan, J., Rakfeldt, J., & Rounsaville, B. (1994). Distinguishing between multiple personality disorder (dissociative identity disorder) and schizophrenia using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 182(9), 495–502. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8083678/.
Steinberg, M., & Hall, P. (1997). The SCID-D diagnostic interview and treatment planning in dissociative disorders. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 61(1), 108–120. PubMed record.
Steinberg, M., Rounsaville, B., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Dissociative Disorders: Preliminary report on a new diagnostic instrument. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147(1), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.147.1.76.
Steinberg, M., & Steinberg, A. (1995). Using the SCID-D to assess dissociative identity disorder in adolescents: Three case studies. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 59(2), 221–231. PubMed record.
Wainipitapong, S., Millman, L. S. M., Huang, X., Wieder, L., Terhune, D. B., & Pick, S. (2025). Assessing dissociation: A systematic review and evaluation of existing measures. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 181, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.040.
Wieder, L., Brown, R. J., Thompson, T., & Terhune, D. B. (2022). Hypnotic suggestibility in dissociative and related disorders: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 139, 104751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104751.
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders (CDDR). WHO. Official clinical classification.