SCARED Anxiety Screen: What It Measures in Children and Adolescents
Updated: Oct 8
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 30, 2026 · Editorial Policy
The SCARED is a standardized questionnaire used to screen for anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents. The acronym is commonly used for the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders; the original research title used Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders. It has parallel child-report and parent-report forms and is designed to identify patterns of anxiety symptoms that may justify closer clinical assessment. The original 1997 development study created the instrument specifically as a child and parent screening measure, and the 1999 replication study established the widely used 41-item form.
A SCARED score is not a diagnosis. It does not establish that a child has generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, or any other clinical disorder. It is a screening and symptom-measurement tool. Diagnosis requires a broader assessment of symptoms, duration, developmental context, distress, functional impairment, medical and psychiatric alternatives, and the pattern of difficulties across settings.
That distinction is central to current screening practice. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends anxiety screening for children and adolescents ages 8 to 18, while explicitly stating that screening tools alone are not sufficient for diagnosis and that positive results require confirmatory diagnostic assessment and follow-up. The recommendation concerns pediatric anxiety screening in general; it does not mean that one SCARED cutoff is a universal diagnostic threshold.
This guide explains what the SCARED measures, how the child and parent forms work, what its total and subscale scores mean, how common cutoffs should be interpreted, what research says about reliability and validity, why parent and child scores can differ, and what should happen after an elevated result.
What Is the SCARED Anxiety Screen?
The SCARED is a symptom questionnaire for pediatric anxiety. It asks about experiences associated with several anxiety domains, including panic-like or somatic symptoms, generalized worry, separation anxiety, social anxiety, and school avoidance. The standard 41-item version produces a total anxiety score and five subscale scores.
The instrument emerged from work by Birmaher and colleagues. In the 1997 scale-construction study, an initial pool of 85 items was tested in outpatient children and adolescents and their parents. The final early version contained 38 items and showed a five-factor structure. A subsequent 1999 replication tested a 41-item version in another outpatient sample and again supported five clinically recognizable symptom dimensions.
The SCARED is therefore best understood as a structured way to organize information about anxiety symptoms. It can help a clinician, pediatric practice, researcher, school-based service, parent, or young person notice whether anxiety symptoms are broad, concentrated in a particular domain, or changing over time. The score becomes useful when it is interpreted alongside the child's history and functioning rather than treated as a stand-alone verdict.
The American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry toolbox provides both the SCARED Child and SCARED Parent forms for clinical symptom monitoring.
What Does the 41-Item SCARED Measure?
The 41-item SCARED measures the frequency or degree of anxiety-related experiences over the recent period specified by the form. Each item is rated 0, 1, or 2. On the AACAP forms, the response options correspond to a symptom being essentially absent or rare, present sometimes, or present often. The forms ask respondents to consider the previous three months.
Adding all 41 item ratings produces a total score from 0 to 82. Higher scores indicate a greater burden of symptoms captured by the questionnaire. The total score is a broad anxiety signal; it does not identify one specific anxiety disorder by itself.
Panic Disorder or Significant Somatic Symptoms
This subscale captures panic-like fear and bodily symptoms that can accompany acute anxiety, such as autonomic arousal, dizziness, breathing discomfort, trembling, or fear associated with intense episodes. A high score means these symptoms deserve attention. It does not prove that the child has panic disorder. Panic disorder requires a specific clinical pattern, including recurrent unexpected panic attacks and the consequences that follow them, and physical symptoms can also have medical explanations.
Generalized Anxiety
This subscale focuses on excessive or persistent worry, nervousness, concerns about performance, future events, and related cognitive anxiety. A high subscale score can be consistent with generalized anxiety symptoms. Generalized anxiety disorder, however, is diagnosed from the full clinical pattern, including duration, difficulty controlling worry, associated symptoms, impairment, and differential diagnosis.
Separation Anxiety
The separation-anxiety subscale captures fears about being away from parents or family, sleeping away from home, being alone, and worries that something harmful may happen to an attachment figure. Development matters greatly here. Separation concerns can be expected at some ages and in some contexts, while separation anxiety disorder requires a clinically significant pattern that exceeds developmental expectations.
Social Anxiety
This subscale asks about discomfort, shyness, or anxiety in unfamiliar social settings and situations in which the young person may be observed or evaluated. Elevated symptoms can point toward social anxiety as an area for assessment, but the score does not substitute for evaluating the intensity, persistence, avoidance, and functional impact required for a diagnosis of social anxiety disorder.
Significant School Avoidance
The school-avoidance subscale captures anxiety-related experiences associated with school, including worry about attending and certain physical complaints in the school context. School avoidance is a behavioral pattern, not a stand-alone DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 anxiety diagnosis. Avoidance can arise from social anxiety, separation anxiety, panic symptoms, bullying, learning difficulties, depression, trauma-related problems, neurodevelopmental conditions, medical illness, family factors, or other causes. A high school-avoidance score identifies a problem area that needs context, not a diagnosis.
For a broader description of emotional, cognitive, physical, and behavioral anxiety signs, see Anxiety Symptoms: Emotional, Cognitive, Physical, and Behavioral Signs.
Who Is the SCARED For?
The SCARED is intended for children and adolescents rather than as a general adult anxiety questionnaire. Age boundaries should be interpreted with some care because different studies, versions, and settings have included somewhat different age ranges.
A 2018 meta-analysis of SCARED studies noted that the instrument was originally validated for youth ages 9 to 18, while later research extended use beyond those boundaries in some samples. The current AACAP child form includes a practical instruction that children ages 8 to 11 may need a clinician to explain questions or an adult nearby to clarify them.
Separately, the USPSTF recommendation on pediatric anxiety screening applies to children and adolescents ages 8 to 18 who do not already have a diagnosed anxiety disorder and are not showing recognized anxiety symptoms; evidence is insufficient to determine the balance of benefits and harms of routine screening in children age 7 or younger. That recommendation is about screening policy, not a statement that every version of SCARED has identical validation at every age from 8 through 18.
Reading ability, developmental level, language, culture, cognitive profile, and the reason for assessment all affect how a questionnaire should be administered and interpreted. A younger child may understand an item differently from an older adolescent. A translated version should have evidence supporting its translation and measurement properties rather than being assumed equivalent solely because the wording has been converted into another language.
Child Form vs Parent Form
The SCARED has parallel forms: a young person reports on their own experiences, while a parent or caregiver reports on the young person's symptoms. The AACAP Child Form and AACAP Parent Form contain corresponding content framed from the two different perspectives.
These forms should not be treated as interchangeable copies of the same observation. Anxiety is partly internal. A child may know about worry, dread, bodily sensations, or feared thoughts that a parent cannot see. A parent may notice avoidance, reassurance seeking, sleep problems, distress before school, or changes in behavior that the child underreports or interprets differently.
Disagreement between informants is therefore expected. In a study of 1,092 anxious and healthy parent-child dyads, Behrens and colleagues found low parent-child agreement while also finding strong test-retest reliability and support for measurement invariance. A separate diagnostic-utility study by Rappaport and colleagues found that parent-child agreement varied across treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking groups.
A clinician generally asks what each report contributes instead of deciding automatically that one informant is correct. Divergence can reveal setting-specific symptoms, differences in what is observable, developmental differences in self-awareness, family communication patterns, or genuine uncertainty. The discrepancy itself can become clinically informative.
How SCARED Scoring Works
On the standard 41-item form, each response receives 0, 1, or 2 points. The total score is the sum of all items, producing a possible range of 0 to 82. Separate combinations of items produce the five subscale scores.
The scoring instructions printed on the AACAP forms state that a total score of 25 or higher may indicate the presence of an anxiety disorder and that scores above 30 are more specific. The same forms provide commonly used subscale thresholds: 7 for panic disorder or significant somatic symptoms, 9 for generalized anxiety, 5 for separation anxiety, 8 for social anxiety, and 3 for significant school avoidance. These are screening thresholds, not diagnostic criteria. See the official SCARED Parent Form scoring instructions or SCARED Child Form for the instrument's scoring layout.
The wording “may indicate” matters. A score at or above a threshold increases concern that clinically significant symptoms may be present. It does not determine whether DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnostic criteria are met. It also does not establish the cause of physical symptoms, school avoidance, social withdrawal, worry, or fear.
The same numerical score can carry different implications in a specialty anxiety clinic, a pediatric primary care office, a school screening program, and a general community sample. The proportion of children who actually have a disorder differs across settings, which changes the probability that a positive screen represents a diagnosable condition. Age, comorbidity, referral reason, language, and informant can also affect interpretation.
The USPSTF evidence review found that accuracy varies across pediatric anxiety screening tests, target conditions, and thresholds. It emphasizes that a positive screen should be followed by diagnostic assessment rather than used as the endpoint of care. Read the USPSTF screening recommendation.
What Does a SCARED Score of 25 or Higher Mean?
A total score of 25 or higher is a commonly used flag for elevated anxiety symptoms on the 41-item SCARED. It means the pattern of responses has crossed a screening threshold that was designed to identify young people who may benefit from further evaluation. It is better read as “look more closely” than as “this child has an anxiety disorder.”
A positive screen should prompt questions about which symptoms are driving the score, whether the child is distressed, whether anxiety interferes with school, sleep, relationships, activities, medical care, or family life, how long the pattern has been present, and whether avoidance has narrowed the child's life. The clinician also considers whether a different disorder, a medical condition, medication or substance effects, acute stress, or another context better explains the symptoms.
A child can also have clinically important anxiety below the total cutoff. A lower total score can coexist with a concentrated problem in one domain, underreporting by one informant, symptoms that fluctuate, a disorder that is poorly captured by a broad screen, or substantial impairment that is not fully reflected in symptom count. Screening thresholds optimize classification imperfectly; they do not create a biological boundary between illness and health.
Can a SCARED Subscale Diagnose a Specific Anxiety Disorder?
No. The subscales are symptom dimensions that resemble clinically important anxiety presentations. They can organize an assessment by showing where symptoms cluster, but they do not independently diagnose panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder, or social anxiety disorder.
This limitation is especially important because the SCARED was developed in an earlier diagnostic era and its item structure was designed around DSM-linked anxiety constructs available at the time. Current DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 categories retain several of those core disorders, but classification systems, criteria, differential boundaries, and developmental guidance cannot be reduced to a questionnaire subscale.
The 2017 Rappaport study found useful diagnostic discrimination in treatment-seeking youth but less consistent diagnostic utility in a non-treatment-seeking sample. That is exactly why subscale names should be read as screening signals whose performance depends on context rather than as miniature diagnoses.
How Reliable and Valid Is the SCARED?
The evidence base for SCARED is substantial compared with many informal online anxiety quizzes. It includes the original development and replication studies, cross-cultural investigations, diagnostic-utility studies, informant studies, and meta-analyses. The overall evidence supports the SCARED as a useful pediatric anxiety screening and symptom measure while also showing meaningful limitations.
Original Development and Replication
The 1997 development study reported good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminative validity, and moderate parent-child agreement for the emerging instrument. The 1999 replication evaluated the 41-item version and again supported the five-factor structure and good internal consistency and discriminant validity.
Cross-Cultural Evidence
A 2011 cross-cultural meta-analysis synthesized 25 studies reported in 21 articles from multiple countries. It found robust psychometric properties for SCARED scales linked to DSM-IV-TR anxiety symptom dimensions, while also reporting age and sex effects. Cross-cultural use therefore has empirical support, but population differences still matter and a translated form should be evaluated in its own linguistic and cultural context.
Large 2018 Meta-Analysis
The 2018 meta-analysis by Runyon, Chesnut, and Burley analyzed 65 studies conducted between 1997 and 2017, including responses from 39,096 children and 2,991 parents across a mixture of SCARED versions. Parent and child total scores showed strong internal consistency; child versions showed moderate-to-large test-retest reliability, and parent-child correlations were moderate to large overall. The authors concluded that the instrument has robust psychometric properties across many community and clinical settings.
That meta-analysis also illustrates why blanket claims about every SCARED scale are too broad. It pooled several versions, including extended forms with additional subscales. Some extended subscales and the school-avoidance scale did not show reliability considered adequate for a screening instrument in the pooled analysis. Evidence for the total score and the core 41-item domains is stronger than evidence for every adaptation ever labeled SCARED.
Diagnostic Utility Depends on Setting
In Rappaport et al. 2017, SCARED performed well in differentiating healthy, comorbid, and non-comorbid anxious youth in a treatment-seeking sample, while findings were less consistent in non-treatment-seeking youth. Screening performance is not a fixed property that remains identical in every population. Clinical setting and the spectrum of severity matter.
Why Parent and Child Scores Can Be Different
A parent may report a low score while a child reports substantial anxiety, or the reverse. This does not automatically mean that someone is inaccurate. Pediatric mental health assessment routinely combines multiple sources because different observers have access to different parts of the child's experience.
Internal worry, anticipatory fear, shame, and physical sensations can be largely private. Avoidance, refusal, reassurance seeking, sleep patterns, missed activities, and school difficulties may be more visible to adults. Adolescents may minimize symptoms because of embarrassment or privacy; parents may underestimate symptoms that occur away from home or overestimate symptoms they observe during periods of family stress.
The 2019 Behrens study directly examined informant discrepancy and found low parent-child agreement despite evidence that the measure itself was reliable. The practical implication is to compare reports, investigate the reasons for divergence, and integrate them with interview and functional information rather than averaging the two scores into a supposedly objective truth.
Can SCARED Be Used to Track Treatment Progress?
Yes, SCARED can be repeated to track anxiety symptom change, provided the score is interpreted in context. A repeated questionnaire can help show whether a child's reported anxiety burden is decreasing, increasing, or shifting across domains. It is most useful as one outcome measure among others, not as the sole definition of recovery.
In the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal Study sample, Caporino and colleagues examined how change on SCARED corresponded with independently rated treatment response and remission. Reductions of about 55% on the parent form and 50% on the youth form best predicted treatment response in that sample; post-treatment raw scores of 10 on the parent form and 12 on the youth form best predicted remission in the total sample.
Those treatment-response numbers answer a different question from the screening cutoff of 25. The cutoff of 25 is used to flag possible anxiety at assessment. The lower post-treatment scores and percentage reductions were derived to characterize response or remission in a specific clinical trial population. They should not be mixed together as if they were interchangeable thresholds.
A child can improve meaningfully without crossing a particular numerical boundary, and a low score does not guarantee full recovery if avoidance, impairment, family accommodation, school absence, or another clinically important problem remains.
What the SCARED Does Not Measure
The SCARED is broad for pediatric anxiety, but it is not a complete mental health assessment. It does not by itself evaluate every condition that can present with fear, worry, physical distress, avoidance, irritability, or school problems.
It is not a diagnostic interview. It does not establish DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 criteria. It does not determine whether physical symptoms are caused by anxiety rather than a medical condition. It is not designed as a suicide or self-harm assessment. It does not comprehensively assess depression, bipolar disorder, ADHD, autism, OCD, PTSD, eating disorders, substance use, psychosis, learning disorders, bullying, family violence, or all reasons a child may avoid school.
It also does not directly measure the full extent of functional impairment. Two young people with the same symptom score can have very different levels of disruption in attendance, friendships, family life, sleep, sports, medical care, and everyday independence. Clinical assessment adds those dimensions.
SCARED and Current Anxiety Diagnoses
A SCARED result should not collapse every form of distress into “an anxiety disorder.” Current anxiety disorders include distinct clinical territories such as generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder, and selective mutism. Each has its own defining pattern and differential diagnosis.
For the broader diagnostic map, see Anxiety Disorders: Symptoms, Types, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
OCD and PTSD can involve intense anxiety but are not classified as anxiety disorders in current major diagnostic systems. Illness anxiety, trauma-related conditions, neurodevelopmental presentations, depression, and many medical problems can also produce symptoms that overlap with items on an anxiety questionnaire. A screening score should lead to better differentiation, not to automatic relabeling of every overlapping symptom as anxiety.
False Positives and False Negatives
Every screening tool produces both false positives and false negatives. A false positive occurs when a screen is elevated but the follow-up assessment does not confirm the target disorder. A false negative occurs when a screen is below threshold even though clinically significant anxiety is present.
The USPSTF evidence review found wide variation in sensitivity and specificity across pediatric anxiety screening instruments, anxiety conditions, and thresholds. It also notes potential harms of screening such as unnecessary referrals, labeling, stigma, and burden when false-positive results are not handled thoughtfully.
False positives are not necessarily meaningless scores. An elevated SCARED can reflect substantial distress that ultimately receives another explanation. A child may have depression with anxious distress, trauma-related symptoms, an adjustment reaction, school bullying, a medical problem, neurodevelopmental stress, or anxiety that is clinically important but does not meet full criteria for a specific disorder.
False negatives can occur because symptoms are hidden, intermittent, highly situation-specific, misunderstood, or reported differently by child and parent. They can also occur when a clinically important problem falls outside the questionnaire's strongest domains. Clinical concern should not be dismissed solely because a total score is below 25.
What Should Happen After an Elevated SCARED Score?
An elevated score should lead to assessment, not automatic treatment. A clinician typically clarifies which items and subscales are elevated, asks the child and caregiver about onset and duration, identifies feared situations and avoidance, and evaluates how symptoms affect daily functioning.
The next step also includes developmental context. Fear of separation, social reticence, worries about school performance, and physical complaints can mean different things at different ages. The clinician asks whether the reaction is proportionate to the developmental stage and circumstances and whether it persists beyond an expected response to a real stressor.
Differential assessment matters when symptoms include dizziness, shortness of breath, faintness, palpitations, headaches, stomach pain, or other physical complaints. Anxiety can produce physical symptoms, but a questionnaire cannot determine their medical cause. New, severe, unexplained, atypical, or concerning physical symptoms should be medically assessed when appropriate rather than attributed to anxiety because the SCARED score is high.
A complete assessment also asks about co-occurring depression, trauma exposure, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, attention or developmental difficulties, substance use when relevant, sleep, school environment, family stress, and safety. The purpose is to understand the child's actual clinical picture rather than force the presentation into the nearest questionnaire label.
The National Institute of Mental Health advises seeking help when a child's emotions or behavior persist for weeks, cause distress, or interfere with functioning at school, at home, or with friends. If behavior is unsafe or a child talks about wanting to hurt themselves or someone else, immediate professional help is warranted.
How to Use SCARED Results Well
A useful interpretation starts with the total score, then looks at the subscales, then returns to the individual symptom pattern. The number tells you how much of the questionnaire's anxiety content was endorsed; the clinical story tells you what those endorsements mean.
Compare child and parent forms rather than replacing one with the other. Note where they agree and where they diverge. Ask which symptoms are internal and which are observable. Examine whether anxiety appears across settings or only in a particular environment.
Connect symptoms to impairment and avoidance. A child who scores moderately but has stopped attending school, sleeping independently, participating in activities, or seeing friends may need more attention than the total score alone suggests. Conversely, a high score during an acute but time-limited stressor may require a different interpretation from the same score in a long-standing pattern.
Use repeated scores consistently if monitoring change. The same version, informant, administration conditions, and approximate interval make comparisons easier to interpret. When child and parent forms are both used, track them as separate perspectives instead of blending them into one composite.
Treat thresholds as decision aids. They can improve consistency in identifying who needs a closer look, but clinical decisions should incorporate the young person's functioning, preferences, developmental level, family context, medical history, and the consequences of both missing a disorder and over-identifying one.
SCARED in Primary Care, Schools, and Mental Health Settings
The same questionnaire can serve different purposes in different settings. In primary care it may be used as part of routine mental health screening or when anxiety is suspected. In specialty mental health care it can quantify baseline symptoms and help monitor treatment. In school-linked services it may help identify students who need further evaluation, but school context also raises questions about consent, privacy, follow-up capacity, and the meaning of school-related symptoms.
The USPSTF identifies SCARED as one of the broad anxiety screening instruments used to detect several anxiety disorders and notes that SCARED and the Social Phobia Inventory are among the screening tools widely used in clinical practice. The Task Force also emphasizes a systems issue: screening benefits young people only when positive results can be confirmed and connected to appropriate care.
Screening programs should therefore be designed around a pathway rather than around questionnaire completion alone. Who reviews the result? Who talks with the child and family? How are urgent concerns handled? Who performs diagnostic assessment? What happens when specialty care is unavailable? Those questions determine whether screening becomes useful clinical information or merely another score in a record.
Is the SCARED Appropriate for Online Self-Testing?
The questionnaire can be completed electronically, but an online score does not change the instrument's status. A website can calculate points; it cannot establish a diagnosis from the number alone. Online administration also cannot reliably determine whether the respondent understood every item, whether the correct version was used, whether another person influenced answers, or whether important medical and psychiatric alternatives have been evaluated.
For families using a public form, the safest interpretation is informational: an elevated score can support a decision to discuss anxiety with a pediatrician or qualified mental health professional. A low score can be reassuring only in a limited sense and should not override persistent functional problems or a strong clinical concern.
Use the official or authorized form rather than an altered questionnaire whose wording, scoring, item order, or thresholds are unclear. The AACAP toolbox provides recognizable child and parent versions and preserves the original scoring structure.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does SCARED stand for?
SCARED is the acronym used for the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders. The original 1997 publication used the wording Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders. Both formulations refer to the same instrument family.
Is SCARED a diagnostic test?
No. SCARED is a screening and symptom questionnaire. An elevated score can indicate that further assessment is warranted, but diagnosis requires clinical evaluation.
What is a positive SCARED score?
On the widely used 41-item form, a total score of 25 or higher is a common screening threshold, and the AACAP scoring instructions state that scores above 30 are more specific. These values indicate elevated screening results; they are not diagnostic cutoffs that automatically establish an anxiety disorder.
What is the highest possible SCARED score?
The standard 41-item form scores each item from 0 to 2, so the total score ranges from 0 to 82.
Should the child or the parent complete SCARED?
Both perspectives can be useful. Child and parent reports often differ because anxiety includes private internal experiences as well as observable behavior. Clinicians commonly interpret the reports separately and investigate meaningful disagreement.
What age is SCARED for?
SCARED is a pediatric measure used with school-age children and adolescents. The 2018 meta-analysis notes original validation in ages 9 to 18, while later studies used broader ranges. The AACAP child form gives special administration guidance for ages 8 to 11. The appropriate age range should be checked for the specific version, language, and purpose.
Does a high generalized-anxiety subscale score mean a child has GAD?
No. It means the child endorsed a cluster of generalized-anxiety symptoms at or above a screening threshold. Generalized anxiety disorder requires a full clinical assessment of the disorder-specific pattern, duration, associated symptoms, impairment, and alternative explanations.
Does the school-avoidance subscale diagnose school refusal?
No. School avoidance is a behavioral signal with many possible causes. It can occur with several anxiety disorders and with other psychiatric, developmental, educational, social, family, and medical problems.
Can SCARED be used during treatment?
Yes. Repeated SCARED scores can help monitor symptom change. Research has also examined thresholds for treatment response and remission, but those treatment-outcome thresholds answer a different question from the initial screening cutoff and should be interpreted in clinical context.
What if the child and parent scores disagree?
Disagreement is common and can be informative. The next step is to understand what each person is observing, where symptoms occur, which experiences are private, and how anxiety affects functioning. One form should not automatically cancel out the other.
Related Articles
References
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Toolbox of Forms: Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders, Child and Parent Versions. AACAP.
Behrens B, Swetlitz C, Pine DS, Pagliaccio D. The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Informant Discrepancy, Measurement Invariance, and Test-Retest Reliability. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 2019;50(3):473–482. PubMed.
Birmaher B, Khetarpal S, Brent D, Cully M, Balach L, Kaufman J, Neer SM. The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): scale construction and psychometric characteristics. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1997;36(4):545–553. PubMed.
Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): a replication study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1999;38(10):1230–1236. PubMed.
Caporino NE, Sakolsky D, Brodman DM, et al. Establishing Clinical Cutoffs for Response and Remission on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2017;56(8):696–702. PubMed.
Hale WW III, Crocetti E, Raaijmakers QAW, Meeus WHJ. A meta-analysis of the cross-cultural psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2011;52(1):80–90. PubMed.
National Institute of Mental Health. Children and Mental Health: Is This Just a Stage? NIMH.
Rappaport BI, Pagliaccio D, Pine DS, Klein DN, Jarcho JM. Discriminant validity, diagnostic utility, and parent-child agreement on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in treatment- and non-treatment-seeking youth. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2017;51:22–31. PubMed.
Runyon K, Chesnut SR, Burley H. Screening for childhood anxiety: A meta-analysis of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2018;240:220–229. PubMed.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Anxiety in Children and Adolescents: Screening. Final Recommendation Statement. October 11, 2022. USPSTF.