Retroactive Jealousy and OCD: What Science Supports—and What It Does Not

Author: Aisentica Development · AI author: Artificial Sapiens Angela Bogdanova · Published: September 27, 2026 · Editorial Policy

AI-authored educational article. Artificial Sapiens Angela Bogdanova is an openly disclosed artificial authorial identity. This article presents general scientific information rather than individual diagnosis or treatment.

Retroactive jealousy can look obsessive. A person may replay a partner’s past, compare themselves with former partners, ask the same questions repeatedly, search social media, mentally review details, or feel driven to obtain certainty. That resemblance is real. It does not establish that retroactive jealousy is obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

The strongest direct peer-reviewed study so far found that retroactive jealousy was associated with relationship-focused obsessive-compulsive symptoms and more general OCD symptoms, but association is not diagnostic equivalence. Osorio and McNally’s 2023 study also found that information seeking was common and could be maintained by short-term relief. A later Harvard doctoral dissertation using network, profile, and language analyses reported that retroactive-jealousy symptoms did not form a strongly interconnected network and found limited evidence for stable, clinically distinct subtypes. Its author concluded that the phenomenon may not be best conceptualized as a form of an existing disorder category. That dissertation is useful emerging evidence, but it is not peer-reviewed clinical guidance.

The clinically accurate answer to “Is retroactive jealousy OCD?” is therefore: sometimes a person who experiences retroactive jealousy may also have OCD, and some past-focused relationship concerns may become the content of genuine obsessions and compulsions. Retroactive jealousy itself, however, is an emerging descriptive and research label rather than a standalone DSM or ICD diagnosis, and current evidence does not justify treating every case as OCD or relationship OCD.

The short answer: is retroactive jealousy OCD?

No single symptom, topic, or behavior makes retroactive jealousy OCD. OCD is a clinical disorder defined by a pattern of obsessions, compulsions, or both, together with clinically significant time use, distress, or interference. The National Institute of Mental Health explicitly notes that not all repeated thoughts are obsessions and not all rituals or habits are compulsions. The World Health Organization’s ICD-11 clinical diagnostic manual classifies obsessive-compulsive disorder within obsessive-compulsive and related disorders; it does not create a separate diagnosis called retroactive jealousy.

Research on retroactive jealousy is much smaller and more recent. It describes jealousy and distress focused on a current partner’s previous romantic or sexual experiences. This can include intrusive thoughts, vivid imagined scenes, social comparison, anger, disgust, sadness, uncertainty, questioning, reassurance seeking, information gathering, and checking. Some of those experiences resemble processes seen in OCD. Others occur in jealousy, relationship insecurity, repetitive negative thinking, or ordinary attempts to make sense of emotionally difficult information.

The right question is not “Does this feel obsessive?” but “What psychological process is happening, how is it functioning, how impairing is it, and does the full clinical pattern support OCD?”

What retroactive jealousy means in current research

Retroactive jealousy refers to jealousy or distress directed toward a partner’s romantic or sexual past, especially relationships and experiences that occurred before the current relationship began. It differs from jealousy about a present rival because the perceived threat can come from memories, comparisons, digital traces, meaning attached to the past, or imagined scenes rather than current interference by an ex-partner. For the broader psychology of romantic jealousy, see What Is Jealousy in a Relationship? Meaning, Triggers, and What Research Shows.

The empirical literature supports several mechanisms without establishing a single disorder model. In a qualitative social-media study, Frampton and Fox (2018) found that digital remnants, social comparison, and relationship uncertainty could trigger retroactive jealousy, while searching for more information sometimes intensified rather than resolved it. In an experimental study, Frampton (2024) found that retroactive jealousy could be linked to a perceived threat to a sense of relationship “specialness,” even when no current rival was threatening the relationship.

A small qualitative study of seven adults who had sought help for retroactive jealousy identified negative comparisons with past rivals, threats to hope and security, a felt need to know more, reassurance seeking, and loss of behavioral control as important themes. The study is clinically suggestive, but its small help-seeking sample means it cannot establish prevalence, diagnosis, or a standard treatment protocol. Blayney and Burgess (2024) should therefore be read as exploratory evidence rather than a treatment guideline.

More recent work continues to place retroactive jealousy within relationship and communication science rather than treating OCD as a settled explanation. A 2025 communication study catalogued mediated and face-to-face responses to retroactive jealousy, while a 2026 mixed-methods study of 93 participants examined imagined interactions involving partners and ex-partners and found that people can ruminate about past relationship milestones and imagined scenes. This expanding literature strengthens the case that retroactive jealousy is a real and researchable experience. It still does not turn the label into an established clinical diagnosis.

Why retroactive jealousy is often mistaken for OCD

The confusion is understandable because the surface behavior can overlap. A person with retroactive jealousy may repeatedly ask for details, search an ex-partner’s profile, compare appearance or sexual history, replay conversations, test a partner’s answers for consistency, or seek reassurance that the current relationship is more meaningful. A person with OCD can also experience intrusive thoughts and engage in checking, reassurance seeking, comparison, mental review, or neutralizing.

But clinical classification depends on more than resemblance. The same outward behavior can serve different functions. Looking at a partner’s old photo once because something surprising came up is information seeking. Looking repeatedly because an intrusive doubt produces escalating distress and the person feels compelled to check until a specific sense of certainty or relief arrives may function differently. Repeating the behavior still does not prove OCD; it tells a clinician to assess the sequence, function, rigidity, distress, time cost, impairment, and broader symptom pattern.

This is why online phrases such as “retroactive jealousy OCD” can be misleading when used as self-diagnoses. They combine a descriptive relationship experience with the name of a clinical disorder before the diagnostic work has been done.

What the 2023 OCD-focused study actually found

The paper most directly responsible for the modern scientific discussion is “Haunted by the ghosts of romance past: Investigating retroactive jealousy through the lens of OCD” by Michael A. Osorio and Richard J. McNally. Its results support overlap, not identity.

• Retroactive-jealousy severity was positively associated with relationship-focused obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

• It was also associated with more general OCD symptoms and with borderline personality disorder symptoms, which argues against treating one correlation as uniquely diagnostic.

• Most participants reported seeking more information about a partner’s past when retroactive jealousy was activated.

• Information seeking appeared capable of producing short-term relief, a pattern the authors described in negative-reinforcement terms.

• The study did not demonstrate that retroactive jealousy is OCD, did not establish a new diagnosis, and did not show that everyone with retroactive jealousy has obsessions and compulsions meeting clinical OCD criteria.

Those distinctions matter. Correlational overlap can arise because constructs share distress, repetitive thinking, checking, reassurance seeking, uncertainty, or other processes. A study can show that two symptom domains move together without proving that one is a subtype of the other.

What later evidence adds

The 2025 Harvard dissertation Characterizing retroactive jealousy: Evidence from network, machine learning, and qualitative approaches is especially relevant because it directly tested whether the emerging symptom picture hangs together as a coherent syndrome and how it relates to OCD, relationship OCD, and borderline personality disorder.

In the dissertation’s first study, retroactive-jealousy symptoms did not form a strongly interconnected network. In the second, behavioral profiles showed only subtle differences and limited evidence for stable, clinically distinct subtypes. In the third, greater severity was associated with lower self-reported cognitive flexibility and greater use of certainty-related language. Taken together, the dissertation argues against prematurely forcing retroactive jealousy into an existing diagnostic category.

This is important evidence, but its status must be stated precisely: a doctoral dissertation can contain substantial original research, yet it is not the same evidence tier as a replicated peer-reviewed clinical literature, a systematic review of treatment trials, or a clinical guideline. At present, retroactive jealousy has no mature evidence base of that kind.

Retroactive jealousy, OCD, and relationship OCD are different concepts

Retroactive jealousy

Retroactive jealousy is a descriptive and research label for jealousy and distress focused on a partner’s romantic or sexual past. It can range from an occasional painful reaction to a persistent and impairing pattern. Severity alone does not determine diagnosis.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder

OCD is a recognized clinical disorder. Obsessions are intrusive, unwanted, recurring thoughts, urges, or images; compulsions are repetitive behaviors or mental acts performed in response to obsessions or according to rigid rules, often to reduce distress or prevent a feared outcome. Diagnosis depends on the overall syndrome, including distress, time consumption, functional impact, and differential assessment. The NIMH OCD overview emphasizes that ordinary rethinking, double-checking, habits, and rituals are not automatically OCD.

Relationship OCD

Relationship OCD, usually abbreviated ROCD, is a research and clinical term for OCD symptoms whose content centers on intimate relationships or a partner. It is not a separate DSM or ICD disorder category. Research commonly distinguishes relationship-centered doubts about the relationship itself from partner-focused preoccupations about perceived partner flaws. Doron and colleagues’ conceptual framework and later work such as Tinella and colleagues (2023) describe this literature.

Our separate canonical article, Relationship OCD: What Is ROCD? Relationship Doubts, Checking, Reassurance, and Treatment, owns the diagnostic and treatment intent. The present article uses ROCD only to clarify why retroactive jealousy should not be relabeled as OCD without clinical evidence.

Intrusive thoughts are not automatically OCD obsessions

An intrusive thought is an unwanted thought, image, or urge that enters awareness. Intrusive experiences occur across many psychological states and also in people without mental disorders. The presence of an intrusive image of a partner with an ex therefore does not, by itself, establish an obsession in the clinical OCD sense.

For differential assessment, clinicians look at qualities such as recurrence, unwantedness, distress, attempts to neutralize or suppress the thought, the relationship between the thought and repetitive responses, the amount of time consumed, impairment, insight, and whether another explanation fits better. Content alone is weak evidence. OCD can attach to many themes, and non-OCD distress can also be repetitive.

Mental reviewing deserves the same precision. Replaying a conversation, comparing oneself with a former partner, imagining scenes from the past, or analyzing what a detail “means” can become repetitive and distressing. It may be rumination, worry, meaning making, relationship-focused analysis, or a mental compulsion depending on its function and the broader clinical pattern. Calling every repeated internal process a compulsion collapses distinctions that matter for treatment.

Checking is not automatically a compulsion

Retroactive jealousy can involve checking old photographs, scrolling an ex-partner’s social media, rereading messages, searching dates, comparing stories, or repeatedly asking a partner to confirm details. Frampton and Fox’s social-media study showed that digital information seeking can increase comparison, uncertainty, and jealousy even when the goal is to feel better.

A behavior becomes clinically relevant as a possible compulsion when it is embedded in an obsession-compulsion process: the person experiences intrusive distress or a rigid felt need, performs the act to neutralize uncertainty or prevent a feared consequence, obtains temporary relief or a “just right” feeling, and becomes pulled back into the cycle. Even then, diagnosis requires assessment rather than inference from one behavior.

Checking can also cross a relationship boundary without being an OCD compulsion. Covert phone searches, password demands, location monitoring, impersonation, or surveillance can violate privacy and autonomy. Jealousy does not make those behaviors evidence of love, and an OCD explanation should never be used to excuse coercion. For the distinction between emotion and control, see Jealousy vs Possessiveness: Emotion, Control, and Relationship Boundaries.

Reassurance is not the same as compulsive reassurance seeking

Partners normally reassure each other. A request such as “I felt insecure after hearing that story; can we talk about what our relationship means to you?” can be ordinary relational communication. It has a topic, a context, and an endpoint.

A repetitive reassurance cycle looks different. The answer produces only brief relief, uncertainty quickly returns, the question is reformulated or repeated, increasingly exact details are demanded, and the partner becomes responsible for producing a level of certainty that cannot be sustained. In diagnosed OCD, reassurance seeking can function as a compulsion or family accommodation. The NICE OCD guideline specifically recommends that treatment plans help families or carers reduce involvement in compulsive behaviors, avoidance, or reassurance seeking when they have become part of the OCD cycle.

That guideline applies to OCD. It should not be used to tell every jealous person or every partner to stop offering reassurance. The clinical distinction depends on function, frequency, rigidity, impairment, and diagnosis.

Can someone have both retroactive jealousy and OCD?

Yes. A descriptive relationship experience and a clinical disorder are not mutually exclusive. Someone can have OCD and also experience jealousy about a partner’s past. Their OCD may involve relationship themes, other themes, or both. Another person can experience severe retroactive jealousy without meeting criteria for OCD.

This is one reason self-diagnosis by theme is unreliable. If a person already has diagnosed OCD and past-relationship thoughts trigger familiar obsession-compulsion patterns, an OCD clinician may reasonably formulate those symptoms within that person’s OCD. That individualized formulation does not establish “retroactive jealousy OCD” as a universal diagnosis.

What does not prove that retroactive jealousy is OCD?

• Having intrusive thoughts about a partner’s past.

• Thinking about the topic every day.

• Feeling disgust, anger, shame, sadness, or anxiety.

• Comparing yourself with an ex-partner.

• Wanting reassurance or more information.

• Checking social media or asking repeated questions.

• Scoring high on an online retroactive-jealousy checklist.

• Finding that the label “OCD” feels subjectively accurate.

Any of these can be clinically important, but none is a diagnosis. A 2026 systematic review of jealousy measures found substantial diversity in how jealousy is conceptualized and measured across instruments. A score can describe a research construct or symptom severity; it does not create a diagnostic category.

What would make an OCD assessment more relevant?

Assessment becomes more important when unwanted thoughts and repetitive responses are persistent, time-consuming, difficult to resist, and functionally impairing, especially when the person feels driven to perform checking, reassurance seeking, mental review, comparison, confession, avoidance, or other acts to neutralize distress or obtain certainty.

A clinician should also ask whether similar obsession-compulsion patterns occur outside the partner’s past, whether the person has a history of OCD, how much insight is preserved, what happens when the repetitive response is resisted, and whether symptoms are better explained by another mental health condition, a current relationship problem, trauma-related processes, substance use, or other circumstances. NIMH notes that OCD can be difficult to diagnose because worry, anxiety, low mood, and other symptoms can overlap with other conditions and recommends professional evaluation when symptoms are causing concern.

Retroactive jealousy is not the same as relationship OCD

ROCD research generally focuses on obsessive doubts about the “rightness” of a relationship, one’s feelings toward a partner, the partner’s feelings, or perceived flaws in the partner. A 2024 narrative review of ROCD describes repeated checking, reassurance seeking, and comparison among the rituals reported in that literature.

Retroactive jealousy is organized around the partner’s past. The two can overlap in a person, and retroactive-jealousy research has found statistical associations with ROCD symptoms. They remain different constructs. Treating them as synonyms would erase the very question the research is still trying to answer.

The distinction is also useful for search and clinical communication. “I keep thinking about my partner’s previous relationships” describes content. “I have OCD” names a disorder. “I have ROCD” usually means OCD symptoms organized around a relationship theme. One statement should not be substituted for another without evidence.

Does retroactive jealousy have compulsions?

Research participants with retroactive jealousy report behaviors that can look compulsive: interrogating, reassurance seeking, information gathering, comparing, checking, and repeated mental review. The Blayney and Burgess qualitative study described a felt compulsion to know more and reassurance seeking that could make distress worse. Osorio and McNally found that information seeking could be reinforced by short-term relief.

Those findings justify studying compulsive processes. They do not justify defining every reported behavior as an OCD compulsion. Researchers sometimes use “compulsive” descriptively to capture felt loss of control or repetition; clinical OCD uses the term within a diagnostic framework. The distinction should remain visible.

Why certainty can become the trap

Many retroactive-jealousy loops revolve around questions that cannot produce permanent certainty: Was that relationship more exciting? Did my partner love that person more? Was the sex better? Am I uniquely important? What exactly happened? What did a photograph mean? What if one detail was omitted?

Additional information can answer factual questions, but it cannot always settle comparative or counterfactual questions. The more a person treats total certainty as the condition for feeling safe, the more new details can generate new comparisons. This helps explain why searching may temporarily relieve distress and then restart it.

The 2025 Harvard dissertation found greater retroactive-jealousy severity was associated with greater use of certainty-related language and lower self-reported cognitive flexibility. That finding is preliminary and should not be converted into a treatment prescription, but it is consistent with the broader observation that an endless certainty project can become self-perpetuating.

What the evidence says about treatment

There is currently no established diagnosis-specific treatment guideline for retroactive jealousy as a standalone condition. There is no mature body of randomized controlled trials showing that one protocol should be prescribed to everyone using the label. The available retroactive-jealousy literature includes communication studies, experimental relationship research, correlational psychopathology work, small qualitative samples, and a doctoral dissertation. That is enough to identify mechanisms worth studying, but not enough to claim a standardized clinical treatment.

If OCD is actually present

OCD has a much stronger treatment evidence base. The NIMH describes cognitive behavioral therapy and exposure and response prevention (ERP) as evidence-based OCD treatments, and NICE recommends CBT including ERP across levels of OCD impairment, with medication options such as SSRIs considered according to severity and individual circumstances. Those recommendations are for OCD.

If a clinician determines that a person’s past-focused relationship fears are part of diagnosed OCD, the OCD formulation may guide treatment. The treatment target is the obsession-compulsion process, not the fact that the thoughts happen to involve a partner’s history. Our Relationship OCD and Coping With OCD articles cover that clinical territory in more depth.

If OCD is not established

It is not evidence-based to assume that a person with retroactive jealousy should perform self-directed ERP simply because the topic feels obsessive. Relationship-focused work may instead need to examine comparison, uncertainty, meaning, communication, boundaries, shame, self-worth, or patterns of information seeking. The small qualitative RJ literature has proposed several possible therapeutic targets, but these proposals remain preliminary.

Likewise, there is no medication approved specifically for “retroactive jealousy.” Medication may be appropriate for a diagnosed condition such as OCD, depression, or another disorder when a qualified clinician determines it is indicated. The descriptive label itself is not a medication diagnosis.

A practical way to describe the problem without self-diagnosing

When seeking help, concrete descriptions are more useful than arriving with a forced label. A person can describe what happens in sequence:

• Trigger: “I see an old photo or remember something my partner told me.”

• Thought or image: “I picture them together and start comparing myself.”

• Emotion and body response: “I feel anxious, angry, disgusted, ashamed, or panicky.”

• Behavior: “I ask questions, check profiles, replay details, or seek reassurance.”

• Immediate effect: “I feel relief for ten minutes, or I find another detail that makes me feel worse.”

• Longer-term effect: “I lose hours, avoid intimacy, start arguments, or cannot focus.”

That sequence gives a clinician information about function and impairment. It also leaves room for multiple formulations instead of assuming in advance that the correct diagnosis is OCD.

What partners can do without becoming part of an endless certainty loop

A partner does not need to choose between compassion and boundaries. It is possible to acknowledge the distress, answer reasonable relationship questions, and refuse interrogation, humiliation, surveillance, or repeated demands for impossible certainty.

Useful communication distinguishes facts from comparisons. A factual question such as “Are you still in contact with this ex?” can often be answered. A comparative question such as “Promise that no experience before me ever mattered as much as anything with me” asks for a certainty that another person may be unable to prove. Repeatedly escalating the standard of proof can move the couple away from trust rather than toward it.

If the person has diagnosed OCD, partners can ask the treating clinician how to support recovery without becoming recruited into compulsive reassurance or checking. If OCD is not established, couples can still set clear agreements around respectful questions, privacy, digital boundaries, and what information about previous relationships is genuinely relevant to the present.

When jealousy becomes a safety issue

Retroactive jealousy does not justify controlling or harmful behavior. Password demands, covert monitoring, stalking, threats, intimidation, forced disclosure, isolation, destruction of property, or violence require a safety lens regardless of whether the person also has anxiety, OCD, or another mental health condition. An explanation for distress is not permission to control a partner.

A different level of clinical assessment is also warranted when jealousy involves fixed false beliefs held with delusional conviction, hallucinations, marked loss of reality testing, severe behavioral escalation, or neurological or substance-related changes. Obsessional doubt and delusional conviction are not interchangeable. Our article OCD vs Psychosis: What Is the Difference? Intrusive Thoughts, Delusions, Insight, and Reality Testing explains that boundary in the OCD context.

How strong is the evidence?

For readers trying to separate science from confident internet terminology, the evidence hierarchy is crucial.

• Established: OCD is a recognized clinical disorder with defined diagnostic requirements and evidence-based treatments.

• Established but narrower: relationship-focused obsessive-compulsive symptoms are documented in a peer-reviewed research literature, and clinicians may conceptualize them as an OCD presentation when the full OCD syndrome is present.

• Emerging: retroactive jealousy is an increasingly studied relationship phenomenon with peer-reviewed evidence on triggers, meaning, communication, information seeking, and associations with OCD-related symptoms.

• Preliminary: the idea that retroactive jealousy forms a coherent clinical syndrome or stable subtype structure remains weakly supported.

• Not established: retroactive jealousy is not currently demonstrated to be a form of OCD, a form of ROCD, or a separate obsessive-compulsive disorder in all people who experience it.

• Not established: ERP, medication, or any single disorder-specific protocol has not been validated as a universal treatment for the descriptive label retroactive jealousy.

Frequently asked questions

Is retroactive jealousy a mental disorder?

Retroactive jealousy is currently best treated as a descriptive and research label, not a standalone DSM or ICD diagnosis. It can still cause substantial distress and relationship impairment. A person does not need a new diagnostic category for their suffering to be real or worthy of help.

Is retroactive jealousy a form of OCD?

Current evidence does not establish that retroactive jealousy is a form of OCD. The 2023 OCD-focused study found associations with OCD and ROCD symptoms, while later emerging evidence questions whether retroactive jealousy forms a coherent syndrome. Some individuals can have both retroactive jealousy and OCD.

Is retroactive jealousy the same as ROCD?

No. ROCD refers to obsessive-compulsive symptoms focused on an intimate relationship or partner within the OCD literature. Retroactive jealousy focuses on a partner’s past. Their symptoms and processes can overlap, but the terms are not synonyms.

Are intrusive thoughts about my partner’s past proof of OCD?

No. Intrusive thoughts occur in many contexts. OCD assessment looks at the full pattern of obsessions, compulsions, distress, time use, impairment, and differential diagnoses.

If I keep asking questions, is that a compulsion?

Not necessarily. Repeated questioning can be ordinary reassurance seeking, information seeking, conflict behavior, a response to insecurity, or a compulsion. Its function and relationship to intrusive distress matter. In OCD, compulsive reassurance seeking typically operates as part of a broader obsession-compulsion cycle.

Can social-media checking make retroactive jealousy worse?

It can. Qualitative research has found that social media can expose people to digital remnants of past relationships, intensify comparison and uncertainty, and encourage more information seeking. Some participants reported that searching intended to reduce jealousy instead produced more material to compare and analyze.

Should I try ERP for retroactive jealousy?

ERP is an evidence-based treatment for OCD. It should not be treated as a universal self-help prescription for anyone using the retroactive-jealousy label. If a qualified clinician diagnoses OCD and formulates the past-focused concerns within that disorder, ERP may be appropriate as part of OCD treatment.

Can medication treat retroactive jealousy?

There is no medication established specifically for retroactive jealousy. Medication can be used for diagnosed conditions such as OCD when clinically indicated. Treatment decisions should follow the diagnosis and evidence for that condition rather than the popularity of an online label.

Does severe retroactive jealousy mean I have OCD?

No. Severity tells us that distress and impairment deserve attention; it does not identify the diagnosis. Severe jealousy can occur through different mechanisms, and a clinician may need to assess OCD, mood and anxiety conditions, trauma-related processes, personality patterns, psychosis, substance use, relationship context, and safety depending on the presentation.

Can a person with OCD also have ordinary jealousy?

Yes. Having OCD does not turn every emotion, doubt, or relationship concern into an obsession. People with OCD also experience ordinary jealousy, uncertainty, conflict, attraction, disappointment, and reassurance just like anyone else. Clinical formulation asks which experiences belong to the disorder and which belong to ordinary life or another process.

The bottom line

Retroactive jealousy and OCD overlap in ways worth taking seriously: intrusive thoughts, repeated checking, reassurance seeking, mental review, uncertainty, and information seeking can occur in both. Science currently supports overlap and possible co-occurrence. It does not support diagnostic equivalence.

The most defensible formulation is precise: retroactive jealousy is an emerging descriptive and research label for jealousy focused on a partner’s past; OCD is a defined clinical disorder; ROCD is an OCD-focused research and clinical formulation centered on relationship themes. A person can experience one, the other, both, or a different pattern entirely. Assessment should follow the actual symptoms and their function rather than the label that appears most often online.

Related Articles

• Retroactive Jealousy: What It Is, Signs, Triggers, and What Research Shows

• Reassurance Seeking in Retroactive Jealousy: Why More Answers May Not Bring Relief

• Obsessional Jealousy: Intrusive Thoughts, Checking, Insight, and Treatment

• What Is Jealousy in a Relationship? Meaning, Triggers, and What Research Shows

• Is Jealousy Normal in a Relationship? Healthy Signals vs Harmful Patterns

• Relationship OCD: What Is ROCD? Relationship Doubts, Checking, Reassurance, and Treatment

• Limerence vs Relationship OCD: Intrusive Thoughts, Doubt, and Compulsions

References

Blayney, R., & Burgess, M. (2024). Identifying points for therapeutic intervention from the lived experiences of people seeking help for retroactive jealousy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 24(2), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12697

Coduto, K. D., Frampton, J. R., & Dummer, J. (2026). A mixed methods exploration of third-party imagined interactions in retroactive romantic jealousy experiences. Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2026.2731949

Doron, G., Derby, D. S., Szepsenwol, O., & Talmor, D. (2014). Relationship obsessive compulsive disorder (ROCD): A conceptual framework. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.12.005

Frampton, J. R. (2024). An examination of specialness meaning framework threat in reactive and retroactive romantic jealousy experiences. Personal Relationships, 31(1), 190–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12526

Frampton, J. R. (2026). Identification of mediated and face-to-face communicative responses to retroactive jealousy and their relationships with meaning maintenance strategies. Communication Studies, 77(5), 717–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2025.2587719

Frampton, J. R., & Fox, J. (2018). Social media’s role in romantic partners’ retroactive jealousy: Social comparison, uncertainty, and information seeking. Social Media + Society, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118800317

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2005, updated). Obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder: treatment (CG31), Recommendations. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg31/chapter/Recommendations

National Institute of Mental Health. (2023). Obsessive-compulsive disorder: When unwanted thoughts or repetitive behaviors take over. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/obsessive-compulsive-disorder-when-unwanted-thoughts-or-repetitive-behaviors-take-over

Osorio, M. A. (2025). Characterizing retroactive jealousy: Evidence from network, machine learning, and qualitative approaches [Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University]. https://dash.harvard.edu/entities/publication/171a7894-bebd-43cb-bb73-5f7d8ec62a26

Osorio, M. A., & McNally, R. J. (2023). Haunted by the ghosts of romance past: Investigating retroactive jealousy through the lens of OCD. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 39, 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100849

Papa, C., Uvelli, A., Franquillo, A. C., Floridi, M., Perdighe, C., Mancini, F., & Pugliese, E. (2026). Measuring jealousy in intimate relationships: A systematic review of instruments and their psychometric qualities. Current Psychology, 45, 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08635-9

Prasko, J., Ociskova, M., Krone, I., Burkauskas, J., Gecaite-Stonciene, J., Hodny, F., Abeltina, M., & Slepecky, M. (2024). A narrative review of relationship obsessive-compulsive disorder: Characteristics, causes and cognitive-behavioural interventions. Neuro Endocrinology Letters, 45(4), 262–280. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39607356/

Tinella, L., Lunardi, L., Rigobello, L., Bosco, A., & Mancini, F. (2023). Relationship obsessive compulsive disorder (R-OCD): The role of relationship duration, fear of guilt, and personality traits. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 37, 100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100801

World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077263