Purging Disorder: Symptoms, Risks, and Clinical Status
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Eating Disorders & Disordered Eating · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Purging disorder is a clinically significant eating-disorder presentation in which a person repeatedly engages in purging behaviors intended to influence body weight or shape without the objectively large binge-eating episodes that characterize bulimia nervosa. It is recognized as a named example within other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). People with purging disorder may experience intense distress, persistent preoccupation with eating or appearance, and potentially serious medical complications even when their body size looks unremarkable. Keel's 2026 review and the 2024 systematic review of OSFED document its clinical significance.
The distinction that most often matters is the pattern surrounding purging: what the behavior is intended to accomplish, whether objectively large binge episodes occur, how much loss of control the person experiences, and whether a different eating disorder or medical condition explains the presentation. A professional assessment considers all of these features together. This article examines diagnostic status, signs, medical risks, evaluation, treatment, and recovery, with particular attention to what researchers know and what remains uncertain.
What Is Purging Disorder?
Purging refers to attempts to change weight or shape by expelling or otherwise attempting to remove consumed food or its perceived effects. In purging disorder, recurrent purging occurs without objective binge eating. Self-induced vomiting and misuse of laxatives or diuretics are recognized examples. The behavior may follow an ordinary meal, a small meal, or eating experienced as excessive or distressing. The experience can become self-reinforcing through short-lived relief from anxiety, guilt, fullness, or feared weight change. For diagnostic terminology and the place of the condition within OSFED, consult the 2024 OSFED systematic review.
The word recurrent indicates a pattern, rather than a single isolated episode. Published research definitions have varied in their frequency, duration, and exclusion criteria; there is no universally agreed, stand-alone DSM checklist equivalent to those for bulimia nervosa. Keel's 2024 methodological commentary proposed more consistent operational definitions for studies, but research suggestions should not be converted into a do-it-yourself diagnostic threshold.
Purging disorder should be evaluated on the basis of behavior, psychological context, impairment, and physical consequences. Weight, body mass index (BMI), and the absence of visible malnutrition cannot establish whether the disorder is present or exclude dangerous fluid and electrolyte abnormalities. NICE guidance calls for fluid and electrolyte assessment when compensatory behaviors are suspected.
Is Purging Disorder an Official Diagnosis?
Purging disorder is a formally described OSFED presentation in DSM-5-TR, rather than a separately listed diagnostic category with its own complete criteria. OSFED is an established eating-disorder diagnosis used when clinically significant symptoms are present and the clinician specifies a presentation that does not meet all criteria for another eating disorder. The distinction is important: receiving an OSFED diagnosis involving purging is a legitimate clinical finding, while the scientific discussion about whether purging disorder should become an independent disorder remains open. Dang and colleagues review this classification.
The ICD and DSM are different classification systems, and their categories and coding practices do not map perfectly onto the research label purging disorder. Clinicians select a diagnosis and code according to the system governing their practice. An online checklist cannot decide the correct code. For a broader overview of the parent category, see Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED): Types and Treatment.
A 2024 critical review emphasized inconsistent operational criteria and unresolved questions about subjective binges and loss of control. A 2026 narrative review concluded that purging disorder has distinct clinical features and serious medical and psychological significance, while also identifying areas needing better evidence. These findings support clinical recognition and continued refinement of diagnostic research. Review of diagnostic inconsistency; 2026 narrative review.
Signs and Symptoms of Purging Disorder
Patterns in eating and compensatory behavior
Signs may include repeatedly attempting to compensate for eating; feeling compelled to purge after meals that others would regard as ordinary; avoiding shared meals or leaving shortly afterward; secrecy around food-related routines; and escalating distress when prevented from engaging in a compensatory behavior. A person may believe that eating requires an immediate corrective action or may feel trapped in a cycle of feared consequences and temporary relief. These patterns are clinical clues, not proof of a particular diagnosis.
Some people report episodes in which they feel unable to control eating without consuming an objectively unusually large quantity of food. Such subjective binge experiences may be important in purging disorder, and researchers continue to debate how to count them when drawing boundaries with bulimia nervosa. Clinicians therefore ask about both the perceived loss of control and the amount eaten, using context rather than arbitrary assumptions. Keel's review of advances describes this question.
Thoughts, emotions, and everyday functioning
Weight and shape concerns can become dominant in self-evaluation. Anxiety, shame, guilt, low mood, perfectionistic expectations, or a sense of urgency after eating may accompany purging. Some people also describe pronounced discomfort or distressing sensations of fullness. These experiences vary across patients, and none is individually required to identify every case. A growing body of research links purging disorder with meaningful psychiatric symptoms and impairment. 2026 clinical review.
The disorder may interfere with school or work, relationships, travel, intimacy, sports, and ordinary social meals. People may arrange schedules around symptoms, conceal physical problems, or postpone medical visits out of embarrassment. Others may continue functioning outwardly while experiencing significant private distress. The severity of an eating disorder is best understood through its medical and psychological effects, rather than through assumptions about appearance.
Possible physical warning signs
Repeated vomiting can be associated with dental erosion, mouth or throat discomfort, reflux symptoms, salivary-gland changes, dehydration, and abnormal electrolytes. Other forms of purging may be associated with bowel symptoms, weakness, or fluid imbalance. Dizziness, palpitations, muscle cramps, and faintness warrant medical attention because they may indicate significant physiological disturbance. The absence of visible signs does not exclude complications. Gibson and colleagues' 2025 medical review and Forney and colleagues' earlier clinical review describe the range of complications.
Purging Disorder vs. Bulimia Nervosa
Both conditions can involve recurrent purging, considerable concern about weight or shape, and clinically important physical risks. The principal diagnostic distinction concerns objective binge eating. Bulimia nervosa requires recurrent binge-eating episodes characterized by both an objectively large quantity of food under the circumstances and a sense of loss of control, together with recurrent inappropriate compensatory behaviors and other diagnostic features. Purging disorder describes purging in the absence of those objectively large binge episodes. See the dedicated Bulimia Nervosa: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment article and the APA practice guideline.
Objective and subjective binge experiences are easy to confuse. A person may feel they have eaten far too much or lost control after a typical-sized meal; that distress deserves assessment even when the episode does not satisfy the objective-size component of bulimia nervosa. The distinction is made through careful interview, not judgment about whether someone 'ate enough' to qualify for help. Research on the boundary between diagnoses remains active. Keel 2019.
The presence of purging by itself therefore does not identify bulimia nervosa, and the absence of objective binge eating does not make symptoms mild. Medical assessment and treatment planning respond to the actual health risks and behaviors present, even when diagnostic classification remains complex.
How Purging Disorder Differs From Other Eating Disorders
Anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa
Anorexia nervosa involves restriction that results in significantly low body weight, fear of weight gain or behaviors that interfere with weight gain, and disturbance in body-weight or shape experience or recognition of seriousness. Purging may occur in anorexia nervosa, including its binge-eating/purging subtype, but classification depends on the wider syndrome. Atypical anorexia, an OSFED presentation, involves the psychological features of anorexia and substantial weight loss while the person's weight is not below the diagnostically defined threshold. Rapid weight change and restriction may create substantial risk at different body sizes. SAHM medical management position paper.
Binge eating disorder
Binge eating disorder is defined by recurrent distressing binge eating without the regular compensatory behavior characteristic of bulimia nervosa. A person who repeatedly purges without objective binges fits neither of these descriptions solely because they experience distress after eating. The clinician considers duration, pattern, context, and alternative diagnoses, as described in the APA guideline.
ARFID, rumination disorder, pica, and other conditions
Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) primarily concerns restricted variety or intake associated with nutritional or psychosocial consequences, without the weight-and-shape motivation typical of purging disorder. Rumination disorder involves repeated regurgitation that may be effortless and is evaluated for gastrointestinal explanations; it is not equivalent to intentionally induced vomiting to influence weight or shape. Pica concerns persistent eating of nonfood substances. These conditions can require different treatments and medical evaluations. NIMH eating-disorders overview.
Orthorexia is a research and popular term for pathological preoccupation with perceived healthy eating and is not an independent DSM-5-TR diagnosis. Night eating syndrome is another specified OSFED presentation. These labels describe distinct questions and must not be inferred from purging alone. Under the EN-09 knowledge graph, the parent OSFED article supplies the wider taxonomy.
Purging behavior without purging disorder
Vomiting and other potentially harmful compensatory practices may occur in bulimia nervosa, anorexia nervosa, OSFED, or in people who have disordered symptoms without a confirmed diagnosis. The behavior can also result from a different medical or psychiatric condition. The dedicated article Purging Behaviors: Vomiting, Laxatives, and Other Health Risks explains the behavior-based health question; this page addresses the particular clinical presentation called purging disorder.
What Causes Purging Disorder?
Purging disorder has a multifactorial developmental context. Prospective and observational studies have examined body dissatisfaction, dieting history, weight-related concerns, emotional vulnerability, and other factors, while recognizing that correlations and predictors are not single causes. Social pressures and experiences of weight stigma may shape symptoms, but individual pathways differ. The 2026 narrative synthesis reviews risk factors and developmental trajectories.
Psychological mechanisms
A central clinical hypothesis is that purging may become an avoidance or relief response when eating is followed by anxiety, distress about shape, negative emotion, or unpleasant fullness. Temporary relief can encourage repetition and narrow a person's coping options. The hypothesis gives clinicians a way to formulate maintenance processes with the individual rather than assuming that everyone has identical motives. The strength of evidence for each mechanism varies. Keel 2019.
People differ in how they interpret normal fullness, perceive body changes, and evaluate their own eating. Restrictive routines may heighten food-related preoccupation; shame and secrecy can then make disclosure more difficult. Clinical work assesses these processes directly and avoids reducing an entire disorder to willpower or one trait.
Physiology and the experience of fullness
Experimental studies have investigated gastric sensations, satiety signaling, and responses to eating in purging disorder and bulimia nervosa. Results indicate potentially meaningful differences, but the studies are often small, selective, and insufficient to support an individual biomarker or blood test for purging disorder. Such physiological findings are scientifically interesting and should inform research, not be interpreted as a diagnostic shortcut. Keel 2019; Keel 2026.
Age, gender, and culture
Purging disorder has been studied particularly among girls and women, but symptoms can occur across genders, ages, and cultural contexts. Underrecognition in men, gender-diverse people, and groups underrepresented in clinical samples complicates estimation and service access. Clinicians should use inclusive questions and assess behaviors directly rather than relying on stereotypes about who 'looks like' an eating-disorder patient. Keel 2026.
Medical Risks and Complications
Purging can change the body's balance of fluids, salts, and acid-base regulation. Certain abnormalities can disrupt cardiac electrical activity or affect kidney function, and complications are not reliably predicted by outward appearance. Risk depends on actual behavior, physiological response, coexisting restriction, medications, and other medical conditions. NICE explicitly recommends evaluating fluid and electrolyte balance in people suspected of compensatory behaviors.
Electrolyte and cardiovascular complications
Low potassium and other electrolyte abnormalities can cause weakness, cramps, fatigue, palpitations, or dangerous heart rhythm disturbances, sometimes with few warning symptoms before a serious problem develops. Dehydration, blood-pressure changes, and fainting also require clinical attention. An electrocardiogram may be indicated when purging is severe or when symptoms or laboratory findings raise concern. The APA practice guideline recommends ECG assessment for severe purging, and NICE lists relevant cardiac risk factors.
Gastrointestinal, oral, and renal effects
Vomiting-related exposure can damage tooth enamel and irritate the mouth, throat, and esophagus. Recurrent purging behaviors may affect digestion, bowel function, and renal physiology, with the profile of complications varying by behavior and overall health. Medical and dental follow-up should address identified injury without making the person feel judged. Reviews document complications across organ systems, while the frequency of particular outcomes remains less precisely established in purging disorder alone than in broader purging samples. Gibson et al., 2025; Forney et al., 2016.
Malnutrition and overlapping risks
Purging disorder can coexist with restrictive intake, erratic eating, and other health concerns. Nutritional deficiencies and medical instability can occur without a low BMI, particularly when intake changes rapidly or medical comorbidities are present. A nutritional assessment evaluates energy and nutrient adequacy, recent changes, physical symptoms, and growth or developmental needs in younger patients. AAP clinical guidance and SAHM guidance emphasize evaluating medical risk across diverse presentations.
When Is Medical Care Urgent?
Seek immediate emergency medical evaluation for fainting or loss of consciousness, chest pain, severe or irregular heartbeats, trouble breathing, confusion, seizures, vomiting blood, severe abdominal pain, or signs of marked dehydration. These symptoms can indicate dangerous complications and should not be managed through an online article. If serious risk is suspected, contact local emergency services or go to an emergency department.
A person who is purging repeatedly should seek a timely medical assessment even without emergency symptoms. A clinician can examine hydration, pulse, blood pressure, relevant laboratory results, and the need for ECG or specialist care. If purging coexists with severe dietary restriction or significant weight change, nutritional rehabilitation should be medically supervised according to risk. NICE medical monitoring guidance addresses urgent electrolyte disturbance, malnutrition, dehydration, and organ risk.
Friends and relatives who notice worrying symptoms can encourage assessment and help with access to care. Avoid interpreting a reassuring weight measurement, a single normal test, or an outwardly calm appearance as a complete safety evaluation.
How Clinicians Assess Purging Disorder
A confidential, behavior-focused clinical interview
Assessment begins with a respectful history of eating and compensatory behaviors, the person's goals and fears, the timing and recurrence of symptoms, perceived loss of control, recent weight or intake changes, physical symptoms, and effects on daily life. Clinicians may also ask about mood, anxiety, self-harm risk, medications, substance use, exercise, gastrointestinal symptoms, and previous treatment. Clear, nonjudgmental questions matter because shame can make disclosure difficult. The APA guideline recommends comprehensive psychiatric, behavioral, and medical assessment.
The interview distinguishes what occurred from how the person experienced it. For example, feeling that a meal was 'a binge' and meeting the technical definition of an objective binge are distinct observations. Neither minimizes distress. The clinician also checks whether anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, atypical anorexia, another OSFED presentation, or a medical cause explains the symptoms better. More detail on the general process appears in How Are Eating Disorders Diagnosed?.
Medical and nutritional evaluation
Depending on clinical findings, evaluation may include vital signs and an examination, blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel with electrolytes and kidney function, and an ECG when indicated. Other tests respond to symptoms, age, medication exposure, growth history, and differential diagnoses. Normal results at one moment do not prove continuing safety if purging persists. The APA guideline and NICE recommendations specify the core medical assessment framework.
Screening questionnaires and their limitations
Eating-disorder questionnaires can help clinicians recognize and track symptoms, but a questionnaire score does not diagnose purging disorder or establish its medical severity. Some instruments emphasize objective binge episodes or broad eating-disorder symptoms and may miss important distinctions. Assessment requires a clinical interview, interpretation of context, and physical examination where indicated. Research also calls for consistent definitions across studies. Keel's 2024 commentary.
Differential diagnosis and other medical causes
Recurrent vomiting can have gastrointestinal, neurological, endocrine, medication-related, or other medical causes. Rumination, reflux, pregnancy-related nausea, gastroparesis, and substance-related conditions warrant consideration as relevant; different forms of purging may also have medical explanations. A clinician assesses intention and context without presuming that every vomiting episode is self-induced or weight-motivated. When physical symptoms are prominent, timely medical examination is an essential part of an accurate diagnosis.
Treatment: What Does the Evidence Support?
Treatment addresses medical safety and the eating disorder together. A coordinated plan may involve a physician, an eating-disorder-focused mental health professional, and a registered dietitian with relevant expertise, with additional specialty input when needed. Core aims include stopping harmful purging behaviors, establishing sustainable eating patterns, reducing feared consequences of eating, addressing emotional and cognitive maintaining processes, and restoring functioning. The APA practice guideline supports individualized multidisciplinary treatment planning.
Cognitive behavioral treatment
Eating-disorder-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), including transdiagnostic adaptations, is an important clinical option. Work typically identifies links among food-related rules, anxiety or shame, compensatory behavior, avoidance, and beliefs about body shape or weight. Treatment then addresses the particular pattern through collaborative, individualized therapeutic methods. The robust evidence for CBT in bulimia nervosa cannot simply be assigned the same certainty in purging disorder, because purging-disorder-specific trials are fewer. Keel's 2026 synthesis discusses clinical application and limitations.
Research involving combined bulimia nervosa and purging disorder samples suggests that early improvement in emotional coping is associated with better outcomes during intensive CBT-based care. This is clinically informative, although mixed-diagnosis designs and observational outcome analyses limit claims about one uniquely validated purging-disorder protocol. MacDonald and colleagues, 2017.
Emotion regulation and associated concerns
An individual may require work on anxiety, distress after meals, negative mood, perfectionism, body-related beliefs, trauma-related symptoms, or other difficulties that maintain the cycle. Therapy can help build alternatives to the immediate relief associated with purging and address barriers to ordinary eating and social life. These targets are chosen from assessment; a particular psychological mechanism is not assumed to apply to every patient. Clinical care also evaluates co-occurring psychiatric symptoms and safety needs.
Nutritional and medical care
A clinician-supervised nutrition plan may be necessary when restriction, irregular eating, growth concerns, or nutritional inadequacy accompanies purging. Medical care monitors complications and determines when a higher level of care is appropriate. Patients should not attempt to correct significant electrolyte abnormalities independently; inappropriate supplementation may be harmful and the underlying condition needs evaluation. NICE guidance details medical monitoring and acute care.
Medication and its limits
No medication has a well-established, purging-disorder-specific approval or evidence base that substitutes for eating-disorder-focused assessment and therapy. A prescriber may consider medication for another clearly assessed condition or clinical presentation based on applicable guidelines, but efficacy findings from bulimia nervosa or binge eating disorder cannot automatically be generalized to purging disorder. Medication decisions must account for medical stability, drug interactions, and potential cardiac or electrolyte concerns. APA clinical practice guideline.
Adolescents and family involvement
Adolescents require developmentally appropriate assessment, attention to growth and school functioning, and appropriate caregiver involvement while respecting privacy and clinical circumstances. Evidence-based family involvement for certain eating disorders may inform care, but specific outcomes from anorexia-focused family-based treatment should not be presented as established purging-disorder efficacy. Medical safety and collaborative specialist care remain central. AAP guidance and SAHM position paper provide age-specific principles.
Outpatient, intensive, and hospital care
Level of care depends on medical instability, psychiatric risk, ability to interrupt dangerous behaviors, nutritional needs, functioning, and support, rather than the diagnostic label alone. Outpatient treatment is suitable for some people; others need intensive outpatient, day, residential, or inpatient services. Severe arrhythmia risk, serious electrolyte imbalance, dehydration, or other medical instability may require urgent hospital treatment. The APA and NICE guidelines address risk-sensitive treatment selection.
Recovery, Relapse, and Long-Term Outlook
Recovery involves physical stabilization and sustained changes in behavior, distress, functioning, and relationship with food. Stopping an immediately dangerous behavior is an important milestone, while residual eating fears, avoidance, shame, or medical consequences may still need treatment. Improvement may be gradual and nonlinear. Follow-up should examine both eating-disorder symptoms and wider quality of life.
Longitudinal research indicates that purging disorder can persist, remit, or change presentation over time. Diagnostic crossover does not mean earlier symptoms were unreal; it reinforces the value of ongoing evaluation. Outcome estimates should be interpreted cautiously because samples, definitions, care settings, and follow-up intervals differ. Forney and colleagues' long-term follow-up; their comparison with bulimia nervosa.
A broad meta-analysis across eating disorders shows why outcomes should be studied at both diagnosis and behavior levels; it does not provide a personalized recovery prediction for purging disorder. Treatment plans benefit from periodic review of medical status, purging recurrence, coping skills, nutrition, comorbid conditions, and barriers to care. Solmi et al., 2024.
How to Support Someone With Purging Symptoms
An effective first conversation is private, calm, and focused on concern rather than blame. Describe specific observations, ask how the person is feeling, listen without debating body size or food quantities, and suggest an assessment with an eating-disorder-informed clinician. Practical support may include helping locate care, arranging transportation, or offering company at an appointment if welcome.
Avoid arguments about whether someone looks ill enough, pressure to disclose every detail, unsolicited meal or exercise rules, and comments that praise weight change. Respect dignity and privacy while taking urgent medical warning signs seriously. If a child or adolescent may be medically unsafe, responsible adults should help arrange evaluation promptly.
Common Questions About Purging Disorder
Can someone have purging disorder without binge eating?
Yes. Recurrent purging in the absence of objectively large binge-eating episodes is the central distinguishing feature of this specified OSFED presentation. A person may still experience distress, perceived overeating, or a subjective loss of control. A clinical interview determines how the complete pattern should be classified. Dang et al., 2024.
Can purging disorder occur at a normal or higher weight?
Yes. Purging-related electrolyte and cardiovascular complications can occur across body sizes. Weight is only one part of assessment and cannot substitute for a clinical history, examination, and indicated laboratory testing. NICE; Gibson et al., 2025.
Is purging disorder less serious than bulimia nervosa?
The label alone does not determine severity. Different eating disorders can produce serious distress, impaired functioning, and medically dangerous purging. Researchers have documented substantial clinical significance in OSFED presentations, including purging disorder. Individual risks determine urgency and intensity of care. Dang et al., 2024; Keel, 2026.
Is vomiting after an ordinary meal evidence of purging disorder?
Intentional vomiting to control weight or shape after ordinary meals can be an important warning sign, but one incident does not establish a diagnosis. Clinicians evaluate recurrence, intent, the wider eating pattern, medical causes, and functional impact. Any recurrent self-induced vomiting merits clinical attention.
Are laxatives or diuretics included?
Misuse of laxatives or diuretics for weight or shape control is among the purging behaviors assessed in eating disorders. Such practices can cause medical injury independently of their intended effect. Their presence requires careful review of actual use, reason, and health consequences. Forney et al., 2016.
Does an eating-disorder questionnaire diagnose purging disorder?
No. A questionnaire may flag concerns but does not establish the specific diagnosis, exclude other medical conditions, or test for electrolyte instability. Clinical interview and medical assessment remain necessary. APA guideline.
Can purging disorder be treated?
Yes. Clinicians use individualized eating-disorder-focused psychological care, medical monitoring, and nutritional support as indicated. The direct purging-disorder treatment evidence is smaller than that for some other eating disorders, so treatment should be tailored and outcomes followed rather than promised. Keel, 2026.
When should I seek medical help?
Arrange an assessment promptly if purging is recurring, accompanied by distress, or interfering with daily life. Fainting, chest pain, severe palpitations, confusion, vomiting blood, or other severe physical symptoms require emergency medical evaluation. NICE recommendations.
Key Clinical Takeaways
Purging disorder is a significant specified OSFED presentation defined by recurrent weight- or shape-motivated purging without objective binge eating. Its diagnostic boundaries are under active research, but medical complications and psychological impairment warrant recognition today. Screening is not diagnosis; BMI is not a safety test; and treatment should combine eating-disorder expertise with appropriate medical and nutritional oversight. Seeking care early is appropriate even when a person does not fit a stereotypical picture of an eating disorder.
Related Articles
Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED): Types and Treatment — the parent classification, specified presentations, and general treatment framework.
Bulimia Nervosa: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment — objective binge eating, compensatory behaviors, and the diagnostic distinction.
Purging Behaviors: Vomiting, Laxatives, and Other Health Risks — behavior-specific medical complications across diagnoses.
How Are Eating Disorders Diagnosed? Assessment and Criteria — evaluation, screening limits, and medical assessment.
Eating Disorders: Types, Symptoms, Causes, and Treatment — the broader eating-disorder encyclopedia entry.
References
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2021). Identification and management of eating disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-040279.
American Psychiatric Association. (2023). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.23180001.
Dang, A. B., et al. (2024). Taking a deeper dive into OSFED subtypes: A meta-analysis and systematic review. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24280.
Forney, K. J., Buchman-Schmitt, J. M., Keel, P. K., & Frank, G. K. W. (2016). The medical complications associated with purging. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22504.
Forney, K. J., Crosby, R. D., Brown, T. A., Klein, K. M., & Keel, P. K. (2021). A naturalistic, long-term follow-up of purging disorder. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719003982.
Forney, K. J., Brown, T. A., Crosby, R. D., Klein, K. M., & Keel, P. K. (2022). Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long-term follow-up. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23712.
Gibson, D., Sterrett, K., Nemani, S., & Mehler, P. S. (2025). The medical complications of purging behaviours associated with eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3178.
Keel, P. K. (2019). Purging disorder: Recent advances and future challenges. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000541.
Keel, P. K. (2024). Guidelines for rigorous and reproducible research on other specified feeding or eating disorder: Commentary on Dang et al. (2024). International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24262.
Keel, P. K. (2026). Invited narrative review of purging disorder: What we know, why it matters, and future priorities. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70141.
MacDonald, D. E., Trottier, K., & Olmsted, M. P. (2017). Rapid improvements in emotion regulation predict intensive treatment outcome for patients with bulimia nervosa and purging disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22766.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Eating disorders. NIMH official publication.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017, updated). Eating disorders: Recognition and treatment (NG69). NICE recommendations.
Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2022). Medical management of restrictive eating disorders in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.006.
Solmi, M., et al. (2024). Outcomes in people with eating disorders: A transdiagnostic and disorder-specific systematic review, meta-analysis and multivariable meta-regression analysis. World Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21182.