Paranoia and Persecutory Delusions: Symptoms and Assessment
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Paranoia refers to suspicious or threatening interpretations of other people's intentions, especially the concern that another person may deliberately cause harm. Persecutory delusions are a more specific clinical phenomenon: strongly held beliefs that someone intends to harm, target, monitor, deceive, or persecute the person, despite insufficient evidence and despite a careful assessment of the person's circumstances. A person may have paranoid thoughts without experiencing a delusion. A persecutory delusion can occur in several clinical conditions and does not, by itself, establish schizophrenia.
The central assessment question is whether a threatening interpretation is proportionate to the available evidence and context, how firmly it is held, how open the person is to alternatives, whether it causes distress or impairment, and whether a psychiatric, medical, substance-related, or environmental explanation is more appropriate. The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) identifies suspiciousness and paranoid ideas among possible warning signs of psychosis while emphasizing that psychosis has multiple causes. The assessment must begin by listening to the person and checking their safety, rather than assuming that an unfamiliar or upsetting belief is false.
What Is the Difference Between Paranoia and Persecutory Delusions?
Paranoia is a broad descriptive term. In everyday speech it may describe ordinary mistrust, chronic suspicion, fear of judgment, or the sense that other people are acting with hostile intentions. In clinical and psychological research, paranoia often refers more specifically to thoughts that other people mean to cause harm. A person who wonders whether a coworker dislikes them may be expressing ordinary suspicion. A person who repeatedly believes coworkers are secretly conspiring to destroy their career may be experiencing more severe persecutory thinking. Whether either interpretation is clinically significant depends on the evidence, context, conviction, accompanying symptoms, and consequences.
A persecutory delusion is a belief of persecution held with a degree of certainty and resistance to contrary information that warrants clinical concern. It may involve beliefs about being followed, poisoned, surveilled, physically attacked, sabotaged, or deliberately targeted by an individual, organization, or technology. The central feature is the personally relevant threat attributed to an intentional persecutor. Such beliefs can generate very real fear and suffering regardless of their clinical classification.
The 2024 clinical research overview by Daniel Freeman describes persecutory delusions as lying toward the severe end of a spectrum of paranoid thinking. The continuum model is influential, but it remains a theoretical and empirical interpretation, rather than a rule that every suspicious thought will become a delusion. Researchers also examine meaningful differences in degree of conviction, flexibility, and functional effects.
A practical comparison is helpful. Someone may say, "I worry that people at work are talking about me, but I might be misreading the situation." That statement shows suspicion and preserved uncertainty. Another person may say, "I know my neighbors have installed equipment to poison me, and every ordinary noise proves it." The second account raises concern about a possible persecutory delusion, but only a professional evaluation of the evidence, safety, history, and broader mental state can determine its clinical significance. Actual threats, stalking, exploitation, and discrimination must always be considered as possibilities.
Suspicion, Paranoid Ideation, and Delusional Conviction
The terms form overlapping descriptive categories, not a self-diagnosis scale. Suspicion is an interpretation that another person's motives may be harmful. Paranoid ideation is a recurring pattern of attributing hostile intent, especially when evidence is uncertain. Persecutory delusions involve a more firmly held persecutory belief that is inadequately supported after contextual evaluation. Clinical assessment explores the process through which a conclusion is formed, maintained, and acted upon.
Conviction and ability to consider alternatives
Clinicians ask how certain a person feels, whether certainty varies during the day, and whether any plausible alternative explanation can be considered. A belief that feels almost certain during severe anxiety but becomes doubtful once the person feels safe differs from a belief held consistently across settings. Nevertheless, insight and conviction can fluctuate; clinical status cannot be read from a single sentence or confidence percentage.
Preoccupation and emotional distress
How much time does the belief occupy? Does the person repeatedly check windows, change travel routes, search for hidden cameras, record other people's conversations, or seek constant reassurance? Are they frightened, angry, exhausted, or unable to sleep? The impact often matters as much as the verbal content of the belief. Research has emphasized measuring conviction, distress, preoccupation, and disruption rather than treating all suspicious thoughts as interchangeable. See the systematic review of paranoia self-report measures.
Effects on functioning and relationships
Clinically significant concern increases when suspicious beliefs interfere with school, employment, housing, medical care, eating, social contact, or ordinary daily activities. Withdrawal and protective behavior may temporarily reduce fear while also preventing opportunities to evaluate interpretations in a safe way. These patterns are useful assessment targets, although no behavior alone proves that a delusion exists.
Personal meaning and context
Words such as "they are watching me" may refer to real workplace surveillance, intimate-partner stalking, state repression, prior harassment, social anxiety, metaphor, cultural or religious language, or a psychotic experience. Clinicians should ask who "they" are, what has happened, what evidence is available, and what the person means before assigning a symptom label. It is possible for actual danger and clinically significant paranoid thinking to coexist.
Common Signs and Experiences
A person experiencing paranoia or persecutory thoughts may describe feeling unsafe in public, suspecting strangers of hostile motives, believing acquaintances are sharing secret information, interpreting neutral looks or remarks as warnings, or fearing they are being monitored. Some repeatedly examine apparently ordinary events for clues that they are under attack. Others stop attending work, withdraw from friends, or become unable to rest because they feel compelled to remain alert.
These experiences vary in intensity, duration, and clinical significance. A fleeting thought during an unusually stressful week differs from a fixed, escalating conviction accompanied by severe distress, unusual perceptual experiences, changes in speech, or marked disruption of daily life. NIMH lists suspiciousness, sleep disruption, difficulty thinking, withdrawal, and functional deterioration among signs that can accompany emerging psychosis, while noting that the presence of a sign does not determine a diagnosis. Read NIMH's overview of psychosis.
Hallucinations and persecutory beliefs sometimes occur together, but they are distinct. A hallucination is a perception-like experience without a corresponding external stimulus. A delusion concerns a belief or interpretation. A person might hear an unfamiliar voice and conclude that someone is secretly speaking through the walls, yet the auditory experience and the conclusion require separate assessment. Others experience persecutory beliefs without hallucinations.
Why Paranoid Thinking Can Develop or Intensify
Paranoid beliefs have no single universal cause. Research investigates the interplay of adverse experiences, mood, anxious anticipation, sleep, cognitive processes, social environments, biological vulnerability, and the particular clinical condition. The fact that a factor is statistically associated with paranoia does not mean it explains a specific person's experience.
Threat anticipation, worry, and interpretation
When a person expects danger, ambiguous social cues may acquire threatening meaning. Repeated worry can keep such interpretations active and reinforce attempts to monitor or avoid perceived threats. Cognitive models propose that emotional distress and preexisting beliefs interact with how unusual or ambiguous experiences are interpreted. See Freeman and colleagues' cognitive model and Freeman's research review.
Sleep and the bidirectional problem
Poor sleep and paranoia frequently occur together. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis included 45 studies and found a small-to-moderate association between sleep problems and paranoia, with substantial variation across studies. The authors reported evidence suggesting some causal effects of sleep disruption and also a potentially bidirectional relationship. Clinically, recent severe sleep loss makes it important to assess sleep urgently, particularly when symptoms begin suddenly or coincide with confusion or major changes in functioning. Restoring sleep can be an important component of care, but it is not a stand-alone diagnostic test or guaranteed treatment.
Trauma, discrimination, and real experiences of threat
Experiences of bullying, coercion, violence, exploitation, discrimination, and betrayal may shape expectations about safety. Some suspicions reflect actual events or reasonable vigilance in threatening environments. Clinicians should assess trauma exposure without presuming trauma is the sole explanation for all symptoms. Cultural identity, immigration experiences, institutional mistrust, and histories of marginalization can also affect how danger is interpreted and described. Research on cultural mistrust and paranoia in clinical interviews underscores the importance of culturally responsive assessment, although its small qualitative sample cannot support broad diagnostic generalizations.
Mental health and medical contributors
Persecutory thinking can occur in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, mood disorders with psychotic features, substance- or medication-related presentations, delirium, and some neurological or neurocognitive conditions. Anxiety, trauma-related hypervigilance, and obsessive doubt can also involve threat-focused thinking that requires careful differentiation. Abrupt onset after a medication change, intoxication, withdrawal, fever, injury, or fluctuating attention requires medical consideration. NIMH identifies several possible psychiatric, substance-related, sleep-related, and medical contributors.
How Clinicians Assess Paranoia and Persecutory Beliefs
A good assessment is collaborative, contextual, and longitudinal where possible. The professional asks what the person is experiencing, what matters to them, what they have observed, what uncertainty remains, and what kind of help they want. The assessment also considers immediate safety, functional change, and alternative explanations.
The NICE guideline for psychosis and schizophrenia in adults recommends a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment covering psychiatric symptoms, risk of harm, substance and prescribed medication use, medical history and examination, trauma and relationships, development, social circumstances, education, functioning, physical health, and quality of life. This provides an appropriate model for approaching significant persecutory beliefs even while the ultimate diagnosis remains unresolved.
Step 1: Clarify the person's account
Questions may include: "What makes you think someone is trying to harm you?" "What first led you to that conclusion?" "Are there times when you feel less certain?" "Have other explanations occurred to you?" "What has changed in your everyday life?" Respectful questions invite detail without either endorsing or ridiculing the belief. A clinician may ask about concrete evidence and whether a concern has been independently corroborated.
Step 2: Examine the pattern over time
Onset, duration, frequency, progression, sleep changes, substance exposure, medication changes, major stressors, and past episodes help distinguish transient suspiciousness from a more persistent syndrome. A timeline may reveal whether mood episodes coincide with psychotic experiences or whether new symptoms followed an acute medical event. A single assessment may need follow-up before a stable diagnosis is possible.
Step 3: Assess other symptoms
Clinicians ask about hallucinations, thought disorganization, unusually elevated or depressed mood, severe anxiety, compulsions, trauma responses, dissociation, attention and orientation, catatonic symptoms, cognition, and changes in personal care. The broader pattern determines whether a psychotic syndrome is present and which differentials deserve further investigation.
Step 4: Evaluate safety and functioning
Assessment covers suicidal thoughts, self-neglect, reduced eating or drinking because of poisoning fears, inability to sleep, possible victimization, perceived need for self-defense, access to weapons, and conflict escalation. Asking about these issues is a normal part of compassionate clinical care, not an assumption that people who experience paranoia are dangerous. Clinical attention should focus on the person's actual risks and circumstances.
Step 5: Consider medical evaluation and specialist referral
Depending on presentation, a clinician may recommend examination, review of medication and substance exposure, laboratory tests, cognitive assessment, and additional investigations guided by findings. New confusion, fluctuating consciousness, neurological signs, or abrupt severe symptoms may need urgent medical assessment. A qualified mental health professional can then integrate findings rather than interpreting any single questionnaire or laboratory result as a diagnosis.
Are There Tests or Questionnaires for Paranoia?
Psychological measures can help describe the severity of persecutory thinking and track change, particularly in specialist clinical settings and research. One established example is the Revised Green et al. Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS), which contains separate measures for ideas of reference and persecutory thinking.
In a large psychometric study, Freeman and colleagues found that the revised scale distinguished levels of paranoid thinking across clinical and nonclinical samples and reported research-derived thresholds. Such thresholds describe how the instrument performed within the studied samples. They are not independently sufficient to label a person's belief as delusional, establish psychosis, or diagnose schizophrenia. Diagnostic interviewing, evidence evaluation, culture, context, and the possibility of real victimization remain essential.
Other instruments and structured clinical interviews may examine delusion conviction, distress, preoccupation, and associated symptoms. A systematic review found meaningful differences in the quality and scope of paranoia measures. Even a carefully validated scale is a measurement tool, not a substitute for comprehensive clinical assessment.
Paranoia, Ideas of Reference, and Other Related Experiences
Ideas of reference involve interpreting events, conversations, advertisements, gestures, or media as having a special connection to oneself. For example, a person may feel that two strangers laughing are commenting on them. Such an experience can occur with varying levels of insight and without a fixed belief. A delusion of reference is held with a delusional degree of conviction. Persecutory beliefs add the theme of targeted harm or hostile intent. Some people experience both, but these are conceptually distinct dimensions.
Hypervigilance after trauma involves heightened monitoring for possible danger; social anxiety often centers on negative evaluation; obsessive thinking involves intrusive doubts that may prompt checking or reassurance seeking. These experiences can feel intensely compelling. Differentiating them requires the person's history, the structure of their thought, the meaning and certainty of the belief, accompanying behaviors, and a broader clinical picture.
For the specific overlap between intrusive obsessional doubts, poor insight, and paranoid interpretations, see the existing English Hub article OCD and Paranoia: Intrusive Doubt, Poor Insight, Delusions, and Differential Diagnosis. This article has its own canonical focus on obsessive-compulsive phenomena.
Does Paranoia Mean Schizophrenia?
No. Schizophrenia is a clinical disorder diagnosed through a broader symptom pattern, course, functional history, and differential evaluation. Paranoia is a descriptive term, and a persecutory delusion is a possible symptom across multiple diagnoses. Neither establishes schizophrenia on its own.
The diagnosis may instead concern a delusional disorder, a short-lived psychotic episode, a mood disorder with psychotic features, substance- or medication-induced psychosis, an underlying medical illness, or another condition. Some people experiencing distressing suspiciousness do not meet diagnostic criteria for a psychotic disorder at all. NIMH's schizophrenia information distinguishes psychotic symptoms from other symptom dimensions and emphasizes individualized assessment.
Schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses require consideration of associated symptoms, duration, and functional impact. Delusional disorder may involve persistent delusions without the full pattern of symptoms characteristic of schizophrenia. Brief psychotic disorder and schizophreniform disorder differ in duration and diagnostic requirements. A short paragraph on these distinctions cannot replace the clinician's full differential evaluation.
How Paranoia Is Distinguished From Other Conditions
Anxiety, trauma-related vigilance, and OCD
Fear and suspicion may be understandable in the context of severe stress, prior interpersonal threat, or an anxious pattern of interpreting ambiguous situations. Obsessions can involve intrusive fears of harm, including fear that a feared event might be true; insight may vary in obsessive-compulsive disorder. The clinician examines thought intrusiveness, rituals, flexibility, actual evidence, distress, and associated symptoms. The published OCD and Paranoia comparison treats that specialized question in depth.
Delusional disorder and schizophrenia-spectrum presentations
The clinical interview examines persecutory beliefs alongside hallucinations, thought organization, negative symptoms, cognition, functional decline, and course. A person with persecutory delusions does not automatically have the broader schizophrenia syndrome. The diagnosis of delusional disorder also requires careful exclusion of mood episodes, substance effects, medical causes, and other explanations.
Bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder
Psychotic symptoms may occur during severe mood episodes. The timing and relationship between mood symptoms and psychosis are central to determining the most appropriate diagnostic framework. Mood-related psychosis and its treatment have their own clinical pathways. NICE directs clinicians to mood-disorder guidance when symptoms suggest affective psychosis.
Substance use, medication effects, and sleep deprivation
Cannabis, stimulants, some prescribed medications, intoxication, withdrawal, and severe sleep disruption may be relevant contributors in particular cases. History and chronology matter; a person reporting drug use does not thereby establish that their belief is substance-induced. Medical assessment can determine whether a drug effect or another underlying cause needs immediate attention. NIMH identifies medications and substances as possible contributors to psychosis.
Delirium and neurological or other medical causes
Delirium typically involves acute disturbance of attention and awareness, often with fluctuation, and requires medical evaluation. New persecutory beliefs in an older adult or in someone with fever, acute confusion, seizures, head injury, marked cognitive changes, or neurological symptoms should prompt consideration of medical causes. It would be unsafe to presume that such a presentation is a primary psychiatric disorder.
What Is the Role of Insight?
Insight describes a person's understanding of their experiences and, where applicable, their awareness that a belief or symptom may have a clinical explanation. It exists in degrees and can vary over time. Some people with psychotic symptoms recognize that certain experiences could arise from illness; others maintain high conviction while remaining open to help for distress, anxiety, or sleep.
A person may disagree with a clinician because the clinician lacks important facts, because communication is poor, because the person has genuine reasons to mistrust institutions, or because delusional conviction is prominent. Disagreement alone should not be treated as evidence of impaired insight. Ethical assessment proceeds through careful explanation, evidence, cultural humility, and collaboration.
How Persecutory Beliefs Affect Everyday Life
Persistent fears of intentional harm can alter sleep, relationships, employment, travel, concentration, and the willingness to seek health care. People may avoid familiar places, stop answering messages, change passwords repeatedly, or struggle to accept ordinary explanations for uncertain events. Families may become caught between reassurance, arguments, and fear that they are being asked to participate in something harmful.
An assessment should also ask about strengths, coping skills, supportive relationships, values, aspirations, and quality of life. A clinically useful plan is organized around restoring safety and functioning, and not simply around making a symptom score smaller. Research identifies emotional distress and perceived vulnerability as significant parts of the lived experience of persecutory beliefs. Freeman's overview emphasizes treatment focused on the factors maintaining threat beliefs.
Evidence-Based Treatment and Support
Treatment depends on what assessment establishes. A person with realistic fears after harassment needs practical safety measures and an appropriate response to victimization. A person whose suspiciousness is primarily associated with anxiety or trauma may need condition-specific care. When persecutory beliefs form part of a psychotic disorder, the treatment plan may include psychological therapy, medication where indicated, family support, and coordinated specialist services.
For diagnosed psychosis and schizophrenia, NICE CG178 recommends interventions including cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis, family intervention, antipsychotic treatment where clinically appropriate, and physical-health monitoring. Selection and sequencing depend on clinical assessment, informed preferences, safety, and specific diagnostic circumstances.
Psychological treatment for persecutory beliefs
Cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis can help a person examine threats at a tolerable pace, reduce worry and avoidance, address sleep and emotional distress, and rebuild confidence in everyday activities. It works collaboratively rather than through confrontation. Specialized approaches have been tested for persistent persecutory delusions. A randomized trial of the Feeling Safe Programme00158-9) found improvements in persecutory delusions compared with an active befriending intervention in the studied sample of people with nonaffective psychosis. These trial results do not imply universal effectiveness or automatic suitability for every individual.
A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis covering ten randomized trials and 904 participants found small average improvements in conviction and paranoia severity with CBT interventions targeting persecutory delusions, along with improvement in psychological well-being. The authors called for further research into long-term outcomes and the most effective intervention formats. The evidence supports offering evidence-based treatment while communicating the size and limitations of observed benefits.
Medication when clinically indicated
Antipsychotic medication may be appropriate when persecutory delusions are part of a psychotic disorder. A qualified prescriber considers the diagnosis, earlier treatment response, medical history, coexisting conditions, potential adverse effects, and the person's preferences. Medication should not be presented as an automatic response to ordinary suspiciousness or a positive questionnaire score.
Shared decisions include discussion of potential benefits, movement-related and metabolic adverse effects, weight, blood glucose, lipids, cardiovascular considerations, and individualized monitoring. NICE CG178 provides detailed prescribing and monitoring guidance. People should not begin, stop, or alter prescription treatment on the basis of a general educational article.
Early intervention and continuing recovery support
When emerging psychosis is suspected, timely specialist assessment can improve access to effective care. Coordinated specialty care for early psychosis combines psychiatric treatment, individual therapy, family education and support, help with education or work, and shared decision-making. NIMH's early psychosis guidance describes the evidence for this service model.
A person may also benefit from attention to sleep, personal safety, occupational needs, relationships, and meaningful goals. Improvement may involve reduced conviction, lower distress, greater flexibility, improved functioning, or several of these together. Course and recovery vary across individuals; an isolated symptom cannot predict a person's life trajectory.
How to Support Someone Who Feels Persecuted
Begin by acknowledging the distress and the person's need for safety. A response such as "That sounds frightening; I want to understand what has been happening" makes room for careful discussion. Ask what the person has observed, what support would feel acceptable, and whether there are immediate safety concerns.
Avoid mocking the experience, demanding that the person abandon the belief, or enthusiastically confirming a feared conspiracy without evidence. You can take the fear seriously while remaining neutral about the cause. Where a concrete threat may exist, document and respond to the facts through appropriate safeguarding or legal channels; psychiatric language should never be used to dismiss credible reports of harm.
Encourage a professional assessment when the belief is causing increasing distress, interfering with daily life, or appearing alongside substantial changes in sleep, perception, mood, or behavior. If the person accepts help, offer assistance arranging an appointment and preparing a timeline of symptoms, medications, relevant events, and questions. Where possible, involve the person in decisions and seek consent before sharing information with relatives or professionals.
When Is Urgent Help Needed?
Immediate medical or emergency assessment is important when a person develops sudden confusion, markedly fluctuating awareness, new neurological symptoms, severe agitation, inability to maintain hydration or nutrition, suspected intoxication or withdrawal with severe symptoms, catatonic signs such as marked immobility or unresponsiveness, or an immediate risk of suicide or serious harm. Severe sleep loss with rapidly worsening psychotic symptoms also warrants prompt assessment.
If a person has suicidal thoughts or fears they may hurt someone, prioritize immediate professional support and safety. In the United States, call or text 988 for the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline; for an immediate life-threatening emergency, call 911. Outside the United States, use the local emergency number or crisis service. The NIMH psychosis page provides American support guidance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is paranoia always a delusion?
No. Paranoia can describe suspicious thinking across a wide range of severity. It becomes a possible persecutory delusion when an unfounded belief of intentional harm is held with clinically significant conviction and rigidity after careful consideration of context and evidence.
Can someone have persecutory delusions without schizophrenia?
Yes. Persecutory delusions may occur in several primary or secondary psychotic conditions, as well as in mood disorders with psychotic features. Diagnosis depends on the full presentation and its course.
Can trauma cause paranoia?
Trauma and real experiences of threat can influence vigilance and threat interpretation. Association does not establish that trauma is the sole cause of an individual person's suspiciousness or delusional belief. Assessment considers trauma alongside other psychological, social, medical, and psychiatric factors.
Is believing that you are being watched always paranoia?
No. Surveillance, harassment, and stalking can be real. An assessment should consider evidence, context, actual risk, alternative explanations, and the individual's experiences before applying a clinical label.
What does a paranoia score mean?
A questionnaire score describes responses to a specific instrument, with interpretation constrained by its validation research. The R-GPTS can measure persecutory thinking, but no score alone confirms a delusion or any psychiatric diagnosis. Psychometric study.
Can lack of sleep make paranoia worse?
Research suggests that disrupted sleep and paranoia are associated and may reinforce one another in some circumstances. Severe recent sleep loss should be evaluated, particularly when unusual beliefs begin abruptly. Systematic review.
Should you argue with a person who has a persecutory belief?
Repeated confrontation often reduces trust and can worsen distress. A more helpful approach is to listen, acknowledge fear, avoid endorsing unverified claims, assess safety, and support access to professional evaluation.
Can persecutory delusions improve?
Yes. People can experience meaningful improvements through appropriate treatment and practical support. Outcomes vary, and psychological interventions can reduce conviction or distress for some people. Treatment should be individualized and monitored over time.
Key Takeaway
Paranoia describes suspicious or hostile interpretations of other people's intentions; persecutory delusions are a specific, more clinically severe kind of belief about intentional harm. The distinction depends on the available evidence, conviction, flexibility, distress, function, cultural and interpersonal context, and the presence of other symptoms. A complete evaluation protects against two errors: interpreting understandable mistrust as illness and overlooking clinically significant psychosis or an acute medical problem. Assessment and support should pursue safety, accuracy, collaboration, and recovery.
Related Articles
OCD and Paranoia: Intrusive Doubt, Poor Insight, Delusions, and Differential Diagnosis — a focused differential between obsessional doubt, poor insight, and paranoid interpretations.
Neurotic vs Paranoid: Worry, Suspicion, and the Limits of Everyday Labels — how everyday language about nervousness and suspicion relates to clinical assessment.
Neurosis vs Psychosis: Meaning, Reality Testing, Symptoms, and Modern Diagnosis — the historical terminology and contemporary boundaries of psychotic symptoms.
References
Brown, P., Reeve, S., Hotton, M., Steer, N., & Steel, C. (2024). Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 114, 102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102503.
Freeman, D. (2007). Suspicious minds: The psychology of persecutory delusions. Clinical Psychology Review, 27(4), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.004.
Freeman, D. (2024). Understanding and treating persecutory delusions. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 50(2), 233–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbae012.
Freeman, D., Emsley, R., Diamond, R., et al. (2021). Comparison of a theoretically driven cognitive therapy (the Feeling Safe Programme) with befriending for the treatment of persistent persecutory delusions: A randomized controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(8), 696–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00158-900158-9).
Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., & Bebbington, P. E. (2002). A cognitive model of persecutory delusions. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466502760387461.
Freeman, D., Loe, B. S., Kingdon, D., et al. (2021). The revised Green et al., Paranoid Thoughts Scale (R-GPTS): Psychometric properties, severity ranges, and clinical cut-offs. Psychological Medicine, 51(2), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719003155.
Gordon, S., Mote, J., & Fulford, D. (2023). Qualitative analysis of paranoia reported in clinical interviews with Black and White adults with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 74(12), 1263–1269. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20220089.
Liu, X., Wang, H., Wang, S., et al. (2026). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for persecutory delusions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 362, 117188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117188.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014, amended subsequently). Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: Prevention and management (CG178). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Schizophrenia. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/schizophrenia.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Understanding psychosis. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/understanding-psychosis.
Statham, V., Emerson, L.-M., & Rowse, G. (2019). A systematic review of self-report measures of paranoia. Psychological Assessment, 31(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000645.