Neuroticism and Autism: Personality Research, Overlap, and Important Limits
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 30, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research on personality and autism repeatedly finds an average association between autism and higher neuroticism, or lower emotional stability. That finding is real enough to deserve attention, but it is easy to overread. Neuroticism is a dimensional Big Five personality trait. Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition defined through developmental history and characteristic patterns of social communication, restricted or repetitive behavior, interests, and sensory features. The two constructs can overlap statistically without becoming the same construct.
The most useful starting point is therefore precise: autistic groups often score higher on neuroticism on average, yet a high neuroticism score is neither an autism symptom nor an autism diagnosis. Neuroticism describes a tendency toward negative emotionality and distress across time and situations; for the broader personality-science definition, see Neuroticism: What It Is in the Big Five Personality Model. Autism requires autism-specific assessment. Personality data can help describe heterogeneity among autistic people, but it cannot replace developmental or diagnostic evidence.
A major review of neuroticism defines the trait as a relatively stable tendency to respond with negative emotions to threat, frustration, or loss; see Lahey’s review in American Psychologist. This definition is broader than anxiety and does not imply psychopathology. Everyone can be located somewhere on the neuroticism dimension.
Neuroticism and Autism: The Short Answer
Yes, studies often find higher average neuroticism in autistic samples than in non-autistic comparison groups. The strongest synthesis remains a meta-analysis of Big Five personality research in autism, which combined correlational and group-comparison studies. Importantly, that meta-analysis coded neuroticism in the reverse direction as emotional stability so all five personality dimensions could be interpreted in the same direction. In practical terms, lower emotional stability in the meta-analysis corresponds to higher neuroticism.
The Lodi-Smith et al. meta-analysis reviewed 14 studies and found systematic Big Five differences associated with autism characteristics and autism-group membership. The largest group difference was for extraversion, but emotional stability also differed. This is evidence of a group-level personality pattern, not evidence that neuroticism identifies autism in an individual.
Three limits matter immediately. First, autistic people vary widely in personality. Second, measures of neuroticism and measures of autistic traits contain different item content and are not interchangeable. Third, co-occurring anxiety, depression, chronic stress, sleep problems, ADHD, and other factors can influence distress-related responses without becoming part of autism itself.
What Neuroticism Measures
Neuroticism is a broad personality dimension concerning characteristic negative emotionality. Depending on the personality model and instrument, its content may include tendencies toward worry, sadness, irritability, self-consciousness, emotional volatility, or feeling overwhelmed. Some instruments use the opposite pole, emotional stability, and some modern Big Five measures use the label Negative Emotionality. These naming differences matter because score direction can reverse even when the underlying domain is closely related.
Neuroticism is not a momentary mood. Negative affect today is a state; neuroticism is a trait estimate based on a pattern across time and situations. Trait anxiety is narrower than neuroticism. Anxiety symptoms are symptoms. An anxiety disorder is a clinical diagnosis. A personality questionnaire cannot collapse these levels into one score.
A high neuroticism score also has no universal meaning outside its instrument. A NEO PI-R Neuroticism score, a Big Five Inventory score, an IPIP-based score, and an Eysenck Neuroticism score come from different instruments, item sets, scoring rules, normative samples, and psychometric traditions. A raw score or percentile should be interpreted only within the test that produced it.
What Autism Measures and Diagnoses
Autism is a developmental condition, not a personality type. The National Institute of Mental Health overview of autism spectrum disorder describes diagnostic evaluation around social communication and interaction, restricted or repetitive behaviors and interests, sensory issues, functioning, and developmental history. In adults, evaluation may be complicated by overlap with conditions such as anxiety disorders or ADHD.
That diagnostic architecture makes an important boundary visible. Worry, emotional reactivity, or distress can be clinically relevant in an autistic person, but they do not substitute for the developmental features required to understand autism. Conversely, someone can score high in neuroticism and have no autism-related developmental pattern.
What the Big Five Research Actually Finds
Meta-analytic evidence
The 2019 meta-analysis by Lodi-Smith and colleagues synthesized studies that either correlated Big Five traits with autism characteristics or compared autistic and non-autistic groups. Across the literature, autism characteristics were associated with lower scores on the Big Five when neuroticism was reverse-coded as emotional stability. Group contrasts were also substantial. This supports the conclusion that autistic samples, on average, tend to occupy a different region of Big Five personality space.
It does not support a one-to-one mapping. A meta-analytic mean difference describes the centers of two distributions. It does not say that every autistic participant falls above a particular neuroticism threshold, that every non-autistic participant falls below it, or that a personality score can classify an individual accurately enough for diagnosis.
Self-report and informant evidence
In a study spanning autistic adults as well as children and adolescents, Schriber, Robins, and Solomon found that autistic participants were, on average, higher in neuroticism and lower in extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness. The pattern appeared across age groups and across self- and parent reports. Yet the authors also found that personality traits were far from perfect predictors of autism-group membership and generally did not predict variability in autism symptom severity within the autistic group.
That combination is especially instructive. A variable can distinguish groups statistically while remaining poor as an individual diagnostic marker. The same logic applies throughout medicine and psychology: distributional differences do not create a diagnostic test unless sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, generalizability, and clinical validity have actually been established for that purpose.
Heterogeneity within autistic adults
A larger online study by Schwartzman, Wood, and Kapp included 828 adults, 364 in the autism group. Five-Factor Model facets accounted for substantial variance in autism-trait scores, and neuroticism correlated positively with autism symptom scores while the other broad Big Five traits correlated negatively. At the same time, the researchers identified multiple personality profiles within the autism group. Three profiles were characterized by high neuroticism, illustrating a common tendency without reducing autistic adults to one personality configuration.
A smaller clinical study using the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised adds another useful qualification. Shirayama and colleagues found higher neuroticism and lower extraversion in autistic adults without intellectual disability compared with controls. Within the autistic group, however, Autism-Spectrum Quotient scores were not significantly related to NEO personality factors. Again, a between-group difference did not become a simple within-group severity rule.
Overlap Does Not Mean That Autism Is an Extreme Personality Profile
One tempting interpretation is that autism could be reconstructed from ordinary personality dimensions: sufficiently high neuroticism, sufficiently low extraversion, and some combination of the other Big Five traits. The evidence does not justify that reduction.
Recent psychometric work makes the point more precisely. Widjaja and colleagues examined whether autism-related traits could be organized within the Five-Factor Model across two studies. Socially oriented autism-related traits overlapped most strongly with extraversion, while behavioral traits were more peripheral and cognitive traits showed less consistent links. The Big Five can therefore organize part of the variance in autism-related traits without exhausting the autism construct.
This distinction also protects against a common semantic error. A correlation between an autism-trait questionnaire and neuroticism does not mean that the neuroticism items are hidden autism criteria. It means the measures share some statistical variance in the sampled population. Shared variance can arise from genuine psychological connections, co-occurring symptoms, common developmental influences, item content, method variance, selection effects, or combinations of these factors.
Why Might Neuroticism Be Higher on Average in Autistic Samples?
There is no single established mechanism. Several pathways are plausible and partly supported, and they can operate together. The current evidence is better understood as a network of associations than as a simple chain in which autism causes neuroticism or neuroticism causes autism.
Co-occurring anxiety and depression
Autistic populations have elevated rates of co-occurring mental health conditions, especially anxiety and depression. In adults, a systematic review and meta-analysis by Hollocks and colleagues estimated pooled current prevalence of any anxiety disorder at 27% and depressive disorder at 23%, with higher lifetime estimates and substantial heterogeneity across studies.
A broader meta-analysis by Lai and colleagues synthesized 96 studies and found elevated pooled prevalence estimates for several co-occurring psychiatric diagnoses in autistic populations, while also showing large heterogeneity by sample and methodology. These findings matter because many neuroticism items concern worry, sadness, tension, vulnerability to stress, or negative emotion. Current or recurrent internalizing symptoms can therefore contribute to elevated personality scores, even though the personality trait and the clinical disorder remain distinct.
The reverse interpretive error is equally important: an elevated neuroticism score should not be used to assume anxiety or depression. Neuroticism is a broad vulnerability-related personality dimension; diagnosis requires condition-specific evidence about symptoms, duration, impairment, context, and differential explanations.
Stress exposure and stress reactivity
Daily-life research suggests another pathway. In a 10-day experience-sampling study of 50 autistic adults and 51 controls, van Oosterhout and colleagues found higher average neuroticism in the autistic group. Within the autistic group, higher neuroticism was associated with a stronger link between appraised activity or social stress and negative affect, and the relation between neuroticism and negative affect varied with social context.
This observational study does not establish that neuroticism causes autistic people to react to stress in a particular way. It does show that personality can help describe differences in everyday emotional reactivity within an autistic sample. Sensory demands, unpredictability, social demands, masking or camouflaging pressures, sleep, environmental fit, and co-occurring mental health symptoms can all shape the lived context in which trait measures are completed.
Developmental temperament
Developmental research provides a related but non-identical construct: temperament. A systematic review by Chetcuti and colleagues found that autistic children and adolescents, as groups, tended to show higher negative affectivity, lower surgency, and lower effortful control than comparison groups. Negative affectivity is developmentally related to later neuroticism, but temperament measures in children should not simply be renamed adult neuroticism.
The developmental evidence supports continuity in emotional style while leaving room for substantial change. Personality emerges through transactions among temperament, learning, relationships, stress, environments, and development. For a broader account of origins, see What Causes Neuroticism? Genetics, Temperament, Environment, and Life Experience.
Shared genetic influences
Twin research also suggests partial etiological overlap at the level of measured traits. Park and colleagues studied 3,170 young adult Australian twins using a 12-item NEO-FFI Neuroticism measure, selected Social Responsiveness Scale items for autistic traits, and Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale items. Their structural models estimated moderate heritability for each measured trait and found phenotypic, genetic, and unique-environmental correlations among neuroticism, autistic traits, and ADHD traits.
This is population-level quantitative-genetic evidence. It does not identify an autism gene, a neuroticism gene, or an individual biological test. Heritability describes variation in a population under particular environmental conditions. A genetic correlation indicates that some genetic influences statistically overlap between measured traits; it does not show that the traits are biologically identical or that one causes the other.
Measurement overlap and response context
Personality questionnaires and autism-trait questionnaires can both contain items influenced by social comfort, uncertainty, emotional reactions, routines, self-consciousness, or coping. Their wording, response format, reporter, and target population can affect observed associations. Self-report, parent report, clinician observation, and diagnostic interview each provide a different window on behavior.
This is one reason the instrument must always be named when interpreting a result. A study using the Big Five Inventory does not produce a NEO PI-R Neuroticism score. A study using NEO-FFI items does not produce an Eysenck Neuroticism score. An Autism-Spectrum Quotient score, Social Responsiveness Scale score, or RAADS-R score is not itself a clinical autism diagnosis, and scores from these measures should not be treated as interchangeable.
Neuroticism Is Not an Autism Symptom or Diagnostic Criterion
The cleanest clinical boundary comes from the diagnostic construct itself. According to the NIMH autism overview, autism evaluation focuses on developmental patterns involving social communication and interaction, restricted or repetitive behaviors and interests, sensory features, and functioning. Neuroticism is not listed as a defining autism criterion.
An autistic person can be high, average, or low in neuroticism relative to the norms of the personality instrument being used. Likewise, a non-autistic person can be high in neuroticism. A personality score may describe how a person tends to experience negative emotion; it cannot establish why that pattern exists.
Autism Does Not Imply High Neuroticism in Every Person
Group-level research often reports elevated means, but autistic people are heterogeneous. Personality distributions overlap. Samples differ in age, sex and gender composition, intellectual ability, support needs, recruitment source, co-occurring diagnoses, medication exposure, socioeconomic context, and whether personality is self-reported or reported by another person.
The Schriber study is especially useful here because it replicated broad group differences while also showing that the Big Five did not generally track autism symptom severity within the autistic group. The Shirayama study similarly found a group difference in neuroticism without a significant relationship between Autism-Spectrum Quotient scores and NEO factors inside the autistic sample.
So the statement “autistic people have high neuroticism” is too categorical. A better evidence-based formulation is: autistic samples often show higher average neuroticism or lower emotional stability, while individual autistic people vary substantially and the trait does not define autism.
High Neuroticism Does Not Mean a Person Is Autistic
Neuroticism is a population-wide personality dimension. Many people without autism score high on it, and many psychological and environmental processes are associated with negative emotionality. High neuroticism can coexist with anxiety, depression, chronic stress, trauma exposure, sleep disruption, physical illness, or none of these. It can also reflect a longstanding personality style without meeting criteria for any disorder.
If a personality result is the only reason someone is wondering about autism, the score is insufficient. Autism assessment asks a different question: whether there is a developmental pattern of autism-related characteristics. For interpretation of the personality trait itself, see High Neuroticism: Meaning, Traits, Strengths, and Risks.
Measurement Matters: Which Instruments Are Being Compared?
Research on neuroticism and autism spans many measurement systems. This matters because the same words can hide different operational definitions.
Personality measures
NEO instruments measure Neuroticism within the Five-Factor Model and, in longer forms, can provide narrower facet scores. The Big Five Inventory measures broad Big Five domains with a different item set. IPIP-based inventories use public-domain items and vary in length and scoring. Eysenck measures come from a related but distinct personality tradition. These scores are correlated constructs, not numerically interchangeable scales.
Autism-trait measures
Studies may use the Autism-Spectrum Quotient, Social Responsiveness Scale, RAADS-R, or other trait and screening instruments. These tools differ in purpose, population, informant, scoring, and validation. A continuous autism-trait score can be useful in research without functioning as a stand-alone diagnosis.
Diagnostic assessment
Clinical autism evaluation integrates developmental history and condition-specific evidence rather than replacing them with a Big Five profile. The NIMH guidance for adult diagnosis specifically emphasizes social interaction and communication, sensory issues, repetitive behaviors, restricted interests, and early developmental history.
This is why claims such as “my neuroticism percentile proves I am autistic” or “my autism questionnaire proves my neuroticism is high” do not follow psychometrically. Each score answers a narrower question within its own measurement model.
Neuroticism, Negative Emotionality, Negative Affect, and Anxiety Are Different Constructs
Neuroticism is a broad trait. Emotional stability is its opposite pole in many models. Negative Emotionality is a closely related domain label used by some modern Big Five instruments. Negative affect usually refers to unpleasant emotional experience, often measured as a state or shorter-term tendency. Trait anxiety captures a more specific disposition toward anxiety. Anxiety symptoms refer to current manifestations such as excessive worry, fear, physiological arousal, or avoidance. An anxiety disorder requires a diagnostic framework.
These constructs correlate because they share emotional content, but they are not synonyms. In autism research, this distinction is crucial because an elevated personality score can partly reflect co-occurring distress while still measuring a broader trait. It is equally possible for an autistic person to experience clinically important anxiety without occupying an extreme position on every neuroticism measure.
Neuroticism and Mental Health in Autistic People
The mental-health context deserves separate attention because co-occurring conditions are common. The Hollocks meta-analysis found substantial rates of anxiety and depression among autistic adults, while the Lai meta-analysis documented a wider range of co-occurring diagnoses across autistic populations. These are disorder-specific outcomes, not alternative names for neuroticism.
Longitudinal evidence also shows that mental health is not static. A systematic review by Tafolla and Lord found variability in trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms among autistic people and identified predictors that differed across studies and developmental periods. That variability is another reason not to treat a stable personality trait as a complete explanation for mental-health outcomes.
Community research has explored whether personality helps statistically connect autism traits with internalizing symptoms. In two non-clinical samples, Grella and colleagues found neuroticism acted as a statistical mediator between autism-trait scores and internalizing symptoms. Because the design was observational and community-based, this does not demonstrate a causal mechanism in diagnosed autistic people. It does suggest that personality is one useful layer in models of distress.
For clinical interpretation, the practical rule is simple: assess the problem that is actually present. If someone has persistent anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, trauma symptoms, sleep problems, or another concern, those symptoms deserve their own assessment. A neuroticism score can add context but should not replace it.
What Daily-Life Stress Research Adds
Experience-sampling work can separate trait questionnaires from what happens in ordinary contexts. The van Oosterhout study repeatedly sampled stress, social context, and negative affect over 10 days. In autistic adults, higher neuroticism was linked with stronger stress–negative-affect associations. This supports the idea that neuroticism may mark differences in emotional reactivity within autism.
The finding is context-sensitive rather than universal. Stress appraisal and negative affect changed across situations, and social familiarity mattered. That is exactly what a dimensional interpretation predicts: a trait shifts probabilities, while environments and states shape what occurs at a particular moment.
What Genetics Can and Cannot Tell Us
The twin study by Park and colleagues is sometimes tempting to summarize as evidence that autism and neuroticism “share genes.” A more accurate description is that, in this young-adult twin sample, measured neuroticism, autistic traits, and ADHD traits showed moderate heritability and statistically overlapping genetic influences. The highest reported genetic correlation was between neuroticism and self-reported autistic traits.
Genetic correlation is a population statistic. It does not convert neuroticism into an autism biomarker. It does not mean that a person with a high neuroticism score carries an identifiable “autism genetics” profile, and it does not show that changing neuroticism would change autism. Molecular-genetic studies and twin models answer different questions, and neither permits individual diagnosis from a personality score.
Developmental Evidence and the Temperament Question
For children, researchers often use temperament constructs rather than adult Big Five measures. The Chetcuti systematic review reported higher negative affectivity, lower surgency, and lower effortful control on average in autistic youth. These dimensions can be developmentally related to later personality, but they are not identical to adult neuroticism.
This distinction prevents retrospective overreach. An emotionally reactive infant is not being diagnosed with adult neuroticism, and higher negative affectivity in an autistic child does not establish a fixed adult personality trajectory. Development includes both rank-order stability and change, and environmental fit can influence how emotional tendencies are expressed.
How to Interpret High Neuroticism in an Autistic Person
If an autistic person scores high on a validated neuroticism measure, the result can be interpreted as a personality description: relative to the instrument’s reference group, the person reports or is rated as having a stronger tendency toward negative emotionality. That may help explain why stress, uncertainty, criticism, conflict, or loss feel especially emotionally salient.
The score still leaves open the important clinical and practical questions. Is there an anxiety disorder? Depression? Sleep disruption? Chronic sensory overload? Persistent social stress? A mismatch between demands and accommodations? Trauma-related symptoms? Medication effects? A period of acute life stress? These possibilities require their own evidence.
The useful goal is not to turn an autistic person into a statistically average personality profile. When distress or impairment is present, support can target the concrete processes producing difficulty: anxiety symptoms, mood symptoms, sleep, coping, environmental demands, sensory needs, uncertainty, relationships, or other relevant factors. Personality can inform the formulation without becoming the diagnosis.
Common Misinterpretations
“Higher on average” means “all autistic people are high”
It does not. Group means can differ while distributions overlap substantially. Individual inference requires individual evidence.
A strong correlation means the constructs are the same
It does not. Correlated constructs can remain conceptually and clinically distinct. Recent Five-Factor Model research finds meaningful overlap with autism-related traits while also identifying autism-related domains that are not reducible to ordinary personality dimensions.
Neuroticism explains the mental-health burden of autism
It is one possible risk-related layer, not a complete explanation. Co-occurring conditions, developmental pathways, stress exposure, sensory experiences, social context, environmental fit, discrimination, support, and many other factors can matter.
A personality test can screen for autism
Big Five instruments were designed to measure personality traits, not to diagnose autism. Even studies in which neuroticism statistically distinguishes groups do not establish a clinically validated autism screening threshold for neuroticism.
If neuroticism changes, autism changes
Trait change and autism are different outcomes. Neuroticism can change across development and in association with life experience or intervention, while autism remains a developmental diagnosis. A reduction in anxiety or negative emotionality should not be described as curing autism.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are autistic people more neurotic?
Research often finds higher average neuroticism, or lower emotional stability, in autistic groups compared with non-autistic groups. The pattern is probabilistic and group-level. Individual autistic people can fall anywhere on a neuroticism scale.
Is neuroticism a symptom of autism?
No. Neuroticism is a Big Five personality trait. Autism is defined through autism-specific developmental and behavioral criteria. Neuroticism can describe personality variation among autistic and non-autistic people alike.
Can a high neuroticism score indicate autism?
A high score can indicate higher negative emotionality within a particular personality instrument and normative context. It cannot diagnose autism or establish that autism is likely in an individual without autism-specific developmental evidence.
Do all autistic people have high neuroticism?
No. Studies report average differences, not a universal autistic personality profile. Personality varies substantially within autistic populations.
Is neuroticism the same as anxiety in autism?
No. Neuroticism is broader than anxiety. An autistic person can have high neuroticism without an anxiety disorder, and an autistic person can have clinically important anxiety that requires direct assessment regardless of a personality score.
Is higher neuroticism in autism caused by anxiety and depression?
Co-occurring anxiety and depression can contribute to distress-related personality responses, but current evidence does not establish that they fully explain the group difference. Developmental temperament, stress reactivity, measurement, shared influences, and other pathways may also contribute.
Does neuroticism make autism more severe?
Some studies find correlations between neuroticism and autism-trait questionnaire scores, while others find that personality does not track autism severity within diagnosed samples. “Autism severity” itself depends on what is being measured. Neuroticism should not be treated as a universal severity index.
Is there genetic overlap between neuroticism and autistic traits?
Twin research suggests partial genetic covariance at the population level. That finding is compatible with shared influences but does not provide an individual genetic diagnosis or prove that the constructs are biologically the same.
Which neuroticism test is used in autism research?
There is no single standard instrument across the literature. Studies have used the Big Five Inventory, NEO instruments, IPIP-NEO forms, and other personality measures. Results should be interpreted within the specific instrument and sample rather than converted into a universal cutoff.
Can therapy or support lower neuroticism in an autistic person?
Personality traits can show mean-level and individual change over time, and interventions can reduce anxiety, depression, or stress. Those are distinct outcomes. Evidence that symptoms improve should not automatically be described as a direct treatment of neuroticism, and change in neuroticism should not be described as treatment of autism.
Conclusion
Neuroticism and autism overlap in personality research, but they occupy different levels of psychological description. Neuroticism is a continuous Big Five trait describing characteristic negative emotionality. Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition defined by an autism-specific developmental pattern. Studies and meta-analyses often find higher average neuroticism or lower emotional stability in autistic samples, yet the association is heterogeneous, instrument-dependent, and insufficient for individual diagnosis.
The strongest interpretation is dimensional and layered. Personality can help explain why autistic people differ from one another in emotional reactivity, stress response, and mental-health vulnerability. Co-occurring anxiety and depression, developmental temperament, environment, daily stress, and partly shared genetic influences may contribute to the observed association. None of these findings turns neuroticism into an autism symptom or autism into an extreme form of neuroticism.
Related Articles
Neuroticism: What It Is in the Big Five Personality Model — the core definition of neuroticism, emotional stability, facets, measurement, and clinical boundaries.
High Neuroticism: Meaning, Traits, Strengths, and Risks — how higher neuroticism can appear in everyday life and how to interpret it without treating a trait as a diagnosis.
What Causes Neuroticism? Genetics, Temperament, Environment, and Life Experience — evidence on developmental, genetic, temperamental, and environmental influences on neuroticism.
References
Chetcuti, L., Uljarević, M., Ellis-Davies, K., Hardan, A. Y., Whitehouse, A. J. O., Hedley, D., Putnam, S., Hudry, K., & Prior, M. R. (2021). Temperament in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 85, 101984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101984
Grella, O. N., Dunlap, A., Nicholson, A. M., Stevens, K., Pittman, B., Corbera, S., Diefenbach, G., Pearlson, G., & Assaf, M. (2022). Personality as a mediator of autistic traits and internalizing symptoms in two community samples. BMC Psychology, 10, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00774-z
Hollocks, M. J., Lerh, J. W., Magiati, I., Meiser-Stedman, R., & Brugha, T. S. (2019). Anxiety and depression in adults with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 49(4), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291718002283
Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64(4), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015309
Lai, M.-C., Kassee, C., Besney, R., Bonato, S., Hull, L., Mandy, W., Szatmari, P., & Ameis, S. H. (2019). Prevalence of co-occurring mental health diagnoses in the autism population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry, 6(10), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30289-5
Lodi-Smith, J., Rodgers, J. D., Cunningham, S. A., Lopata, C., & Thomeer, M. L. (2019). Meta-analysis of Big Five personality traits in autism spectrum disorder. Autism, 23(3), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318766571
National Institute of Mental Health. (2025). Autism Spectrum Disorder. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/autism-spectrum-disorder
Park, S.-H., Guastella, A. J., Lynskey, M., Agrawal, A., Constantino, J. N., Medland, S. E., Song, Y. J. C., Martin, N. G., & Colodro-Conde, L. (2017). Neuroticism and the overlap between autistic and ADHD traits: Findings from a population sample of young adult Australian twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 20(4), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2017.38
Schriber, R. A., Robins, R. W., & Solomon, M. (2014). Personality and self-insight in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034950
Schwartzman, B. C., Wood, J. J., & Kapp, S. K. (2016). Can the Five Factor Model of Personality account for the variability of autism symptom expression? Multivariate approaches to behavioral phenotyping in adult autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(1), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2571-x
Shirayama, Y., Matsumoto, K., Hamatani, S., Muneoka, K., Okada, A., & Sato, K. (2022). Associations among autistic traits, cognitive and affective empathy, and personality traits in adults with autism spectrum disorder and no intellectual disability. Scientific Reports, 12, 3125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07101-x
Tafolla, M., & Lord, C. (2024). Longitudinal analyses of mental health in autistic individuals: A systematic review. Brain Sciences, 14(10), 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14101033
van Oosterhout, J., van der Linden, K., Simons, C. J. P., van Amelsvoort, T., & Marcelis, M. (2022). Exploring the autism spectrum: Moderating effects of neuroticism on stress reactivity and on the association between social context and negative affect. Development and Psychopathology, 34(4), 1366–1375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420002278
Widjaja, E. S., Spackman, E. K., Bainbridge, T. F., Ludeke, S. G., Uljarevic, M., Hudry, K., & Smillie, L. D. (2026). The utility of the Five Factor Model of personality as an organizing framework for autism-related traits. Assessment, 33(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911251326395