Natural Sugar vs Added Sugar: What Is the Difference?
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Natural sugar and added sugar are not two different chemical species. The main difference is how the sugar enters a food. Sugars that are already present in foods such as whole fruit or plain milk are commonly called naturally occurring or “natural” sugars. Added sugars are sugars introduced during processing or preparation, and the U.S. Nutrition Facts label has a specific Added Sugars category for them. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) states that Total Sugars include both naturally occurring sugars and added sugars, while Added Sugars exclude the sugars naturally present in milk, fruits, and vegetables.
That simple distinction solves most questions, but several common cases are less intuitive. Honey can be a natural-origin food and still count as added sugar when used as a sweetener. A bottle of 100% fruit juice can contain no FDA Added Sugars while its naturally occurring juice sugars are classified as free sugars by the World Health Organization. And a product labeled “no added sugar” can still contain substantial Total Sugars.
This guide explains those distinctions without turning a labeling question into blood-glucose medicine. For the broader chemistry, food uses, health context, and psychology of sugar, see Sugar: What It Is, Types, Uses, Health, and Psychology.
Natural Sugar vs Added Sugar: The Short Answer
• Natural sugar usually means sugar already present in the food itself, such as fructose, glucose, and sucrose in fruit or lactose in plain milk. It is a useful everyday phrase, not a separate molecule or a dedicated U.S. Nutrition Facts line.
• Added sugar means sugar added during processing or preparation, or a sweetener that the FDA treats as an added-sugar source. Examples include table sugar, dextrose, syrups, honey, and qualifying fruit or vegetable juice concentrates.
• Total Sugars is the label total. It includes naturally occurring sugars plus Added Sugars.
• Free sugars is a WHO public-health category. It includes sugars added by manufacturers, cooks, or consumers, plus sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates.
• The molecule alone does not tell you whether a sugar is “natural” or “added.” The same sucrose, glucose, or fructose molecule can occur naturally in a food or be added to another food.
• Food context still matters. Whole fruit, fruit juice, a sweetened beverage, and a spoonful of sugar can contain overlapping sugar molecules while differing in structure, fiber, energy density, eating rate, satiety, and other components.
What Does “Natural Sugar” Mean?
“Natural sugar” is common consumer language, but it is not the name of a nutrient line on the U.S. Nutrition Facts label. The more precise phrase is naturally occurring sugar: sugar that is already present as part of the food rather than introduced as a sweetening ingredient during processing.
Examples include lactose naturally present in plain milk; fructose, glucose, and sucrose naturally present in fruit; and the various sugars naturally present in vegetables. A useful companion article is Where Does Sugar Come From? Cane, Beets, Fruits, and Milk, which separates the biological source of a sugar from the way a packaged food is labeled.
The word “natural” can also refer to a sweetener’s source or marketing identity. That creates a major ambiguity. Honey, maple syrup, agave syrup, coconut sugar, raw cane sugar, and similar ingredients may be described as natural-origin sweeteners, yet when they are used to sweeten another food, their sugars can still count as Added Sugars. “Natural source” and “naturally occurring in this food” are different questions.
The FDA’s broader policy on the word “natural” in food labeling is also narrower than many consumers assume: the agency has a longstanding policy about artificial or synthetic substances, but it has not established a formal rulemaking definition that makes “natural” a nutritional or health claim. In other words, the word natural is not a scientific shortcut for healthier.
What Counts as Added Sugar Under FDA Rules?
The FDA defines Added Sugars as sugars added during food processing, foods packaged as sweeteners, sugars from syrups and honey, and sugars from concentrated fruit or vegetable juices under specified conditions. Common examples include sucrose, dextrose, corn syrup, honey, and other caloric sweeteners. The official FDA Added Sugars guide is the primary source for the consumer-facing definition.
The phrase “added sugar” therefore describes a route into the food supply, not a unique chemical family. Table sugar is sucrose whether the sucrose is naturally present in sugar cane before processing or sprinkled into oatmeal at breakfast. Once table sugar is used as a sweetener, it is an added-sugar source.
Fruit and vegetable juice concentrates require more care. FDA industry guidance explains that concentrated juice sugars can count as Added Sugars when they contribute sugars beyond what would be expected from an equivalent amount of 100% juice of the same type, while specific exceptions apply to certain 100% juice concentrates and related products. The FDA’s industry guidance on Nutrition Facts changes is the right source when a product formulation makes this distinction important.
Single-ingredient sweeteners are another special case. Pure honey, maple syrup, and table sugar are treated as sources of Added Sugars, but FDA labeling rules allow a special presentation so the label does not misleadingly suggest that another sweetener was added to the honey, syrup, or bag of sugar itself.
Natural Sugar, Added Sugar, Total Sugars, and Free Sugars Are Different Categories
Four terms often get collapsed into one. Keeping them separate prevents most labeling errors.
• Naturally occurring sugars — sugars already present in the food, such as lactose in plain milk or sugars in whole fruit.
• Total Sugars — the FDA Nutrition Facts total. It includes naturally occurring sugars plus Added Sugars.
• Added Sugars — the FDA labeling category for sugars added during processing/preparation and other sweetener sources included by the FDA definition.
• Free sugars — the WHO category that includes added sugars plus sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates.
The World Health Organization’s current healthy-diet guidance explicitly includes sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates within free sugars. Free sugars is therefore broader than the everyday idea of “sugar added at the factory,” and it is not a line printed on the standard U.S. Nutrition Facts label.
This is why a product can truthfully have 0 g Added Sugars under FDA labeling and still contribute free sugars under WHO terminology. A 100% fruit juice with no sweetener added is the clearest everyday example.
Examples: Fruit, Milk, Yogurt, Juice, Honey, and Sweeteners
Whole fruit
A plain apple, orange, banana, grape, or berry contains naturally occurring sugars. Those sugars are part of the fruit’s cellular structure and arrive with water, fiber, micronutrients, and phytochemicals. They are not FDA Added Sugars merely because they include fructose or glucose.
Plain milk
Plain milk naturally contains lactose. That lactose contributes to Total Sugars, but it is not Added Sugar. A flavored milk can contain both naturally occurring lactose and added sweeteners, so Total Sugars can be higher than Added Sugars.
Sweetened yogurt
Sweetened yogurt is a useful label-reading example because it can contain both categories at once. The FDA illustrates a yogurt with 15 g Total Sugars and 7 g Added Sugars; the remaining 8 g are naturally occurring sugars. The word “Includes” on the label means Added Sugars are already included inside Total Sugars, not added on top of that number. For the exact U.S. label nesting, arithmetic, and %DV interpretation, see Total Sugar vs Added Sugar: What Nutrition Labels Mean.
100% fruit juice
If no sweetener has been added, 100% fruit juice can have Total Sugars while showing 0 g Added Sugars under FDA labeling. WHO uses a different public-health framework and counts sugars naturally present in fruit juice as free sugars. That is a definition difference, not a contradiction.
Honey and maple syrup
Honey and maple syrup are foods from natural sources, yet they function as caloric sweeteners. FDA guidance treats single-ingredient sugars and syrups as Added Sugars for dietary labeling purposes, with special display rules for the package itself. WHO also includes sugars in honey and syrups among free sugars.
Raw, brown, cane, coconut, and organic sugars
Processing style, color, origin, and organic certification do not move a sweetener out of the Added Sugars category when it is used to sweeten food. Brown sugar, raw cane sugar, coconut sugar, and organic cane sugar may differ in flavor, crystal size, molasses content, provenance, or production method, but those distinctions do not convert an added sweetener into naturally occurring sugar inside the finished food. For the labeling-versus-naturalness distinction, see Organic Cane Sugar: What the Label Means and What It Does Not.
Are Natural and Added Sugars Chemically Different?
Not as categories. “Natural sugar” and “added sugar” describe origin and use, not a separate chemical identity. Sucrose is sucrose; glucose is glucose; fructose is fructose. The same molecule can be naturally present in one food and added to another.
That does not make the food context irrelevant. A sugar molecule is only one part of a food. The matrix around it can change eating rate, digestion, satiety, and the amount of energy delivered before fullness develops. A 2024 review by Gonzalez concluded that the food source can modify physiological responses to dietary sugars and identified food structure, energy density, fiber, potassium, and polyphenols among plausible contributors.
Controlled-trial evidence also argues against treating every source of fructose-containing sugars as interchangeable. A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis by Chiavaroli and colleagues found that energy control and food source modified effects on adiposity: excess energy from sugar-sweetened beverages was associated with weight gain, while several other sources showed different or neutral patterns under different trial conditions.
So two slogans both fail: “all sugars are exactly the same” ignores food form and dietary context, while “natural sugar is a different, harmless molecule” invents a chemical distinction that does not exist.
Why Whole Fruit and a Sugary Drink Are Not Interchangeable
The distinction is easier to understand if you stop asking only “which sugar molecule is present?” and ask “what food carries the sugar, in what physical form, and in what amount?” Whole fruit requires chewing, contains intact structure and fiber, and usually has lower energy density than a sweetened drink. A beverage can deliver sugar rapidly with little chewing and less structural resistance.
This does not mean every fruit product has the same properties as whole fruit. Juice is the important boundary case. WHO explicitly notes that many fruit juices, including those without added sugars, contain significant free sugars. Reviews of human studies likewise find that source and physical structure can modify responses. The practical implication is precise: “0 g Added Sugars” tells you how the product was formulated; it does not tell you the entire nutritional story.
For digestion and metabolism without turning this article into glucose monitoring advice, see Sugar Digestion: What Happens After You Eat Sugar and How the Body Uses Sugar: Energy, Storage, and Metabolism.
How to Read Natural and Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label
On a U.S. Nutrition Facts label, start with three places: Serving Size, Total Carbohydrate, and the nested sugar lines under carbohydrate. For a focused walkthrough of the entire panel, see Sugar Nutrition Facts: Calories, Carbohydrates, and Added Sugars.
Step 1: Check the serving size
Nutrition numbers are usually expressed per labeled serving. FDA guidance emphasizes that serving size reflects the amount people typically eat or drink; it is not a recommendation for how much you should consume. If you eat two servings, the sugar amounts represented by the label generally double. The FDA’s serving-size guidance is useful when a package contains more than one serving.
Step 2: Read Total Sugars
Total Sugars is the combined amount of naturally occurring and added sugars in the serving. A product can therefore have a meaningful Total Sugars number even when Added Sugars is 0 g.
Step 3: Read “Includes X g Added Sugars”
The Added Sugars line tells you how much of the total comes from the FDA Added Sugars category. If a yogurt lists 15 g Total Sugars and “Includes 7 g Added Sugars,” the 7 g is part of the 15 g. Do not add 15 + 7.
Step 4: Use the ingredient list for source, not grams
The ingredient list can reveal which sweeteners are present, but it usually does not tell you how many grams each contributes. Ingredients are listed by weight, and a product may use several sweeteners. Use the Added Sugars line for the quantitative amount and the ingredient list to understand sources. The English Hub guide Names for Sugar: Common Terms on Food and Ingredient Labels covers common ingredient names without treating every carbohydrate as added sugar.
Step 5: Keep carbohydrates and sugars distinct
Total Carbohydrate includes more than sugars. It can also include starch and dietary fiber. If that distinction is unclear, Sugar vs Carbohydrates: What Is the Difference? separates the chemical and labeling categories.
Ingredient Lists: What They Can and Cannot Tell You
Ingredient lists are essential for identifying sweetener sources, but they are easy to overread. Finding cane sugar, honey, corn syrup, agave syrup, dextrose, or another sweetener tells you that an added-sugar source is present; it does not tell you the gram amount contributed by that ingredient.
Conversely, the absence of the word “sugar” does not prove the absence of Added Sugars. Sweeteners have many names, including syrups and individual sugars ending in -ose. The current U.S. Dietary Guidelines also encourage readers to look for sugar, syrup, and -ose terms when identifying added-sugar sources, although the Nutrition Facts Added Sugars line remains the more direct gram measure for packaged foods.
Ingredient splitting can also affect perception. A product may use several different sweeteners rather than one, which can distribute them across the ingredient list. The nutrition panel aggregates their contribution to Added Sugars even when the ingredient names are distributed.
“No Added Sugar” Is Not the Same as Sugar-Free
These claims answer different questions. FDA materials summarizing 21 CFR 101.60 explain that “no added sugars” or “without added sugars” can be used when no sugar or sugar-containing ingredient is added during processing under the applicable conditions. A food can qualify for that claim while still containing naturally occurring sugars.
“Sugar free” is a different nutrient-content claim. FDA guidance sets a threshold of less than 0.5 g sugars per reference amount and labeled serving, together with other conditions. The official FDA nutrient-content claim summary also makes clear that “no added sugars” does not mean calorie-free.
A practical example: unsweetened applesauce may contain natural fruit sugars and still make a no-added-sugar claim if the regulatory conditions are satisfied. It would not automatically be sugar-free. The same logic applies to many fruit and dairy products.
Is Natural Sugar Healthier Than Added Sugar?
There is no useful universal answer based on the adjective natural alone. Health effects depend on the food source, amount, dietary pattern, physical form, nutrient matrix, and what the food replaces. Whole fruit is not nutritionally equivalent to a sugar-sweetened beverage simply because both can contain glucose and fructose; honey does not become equivalent to whole fruit simply because both come from natural sources.
Public-health frameworks therefore focus on categories that better track dietary context. FDA labels separate Added Sugars from Total Sugars. WHO focuses on free sugars, a category that includes honey, syrups, and fruit-juice sugars even when they are naturally occurring in those products. Neither framework treats “natural” as a blanket health exemption.
The FDA label currently uses a Daily Value of 50 g for Added Sugars on a 2,000-calorie reference diet. That is a standardized label reference, not an individualized prescription. The current Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030 are a separate federal guidance document and use their own current recommendations. This article owns the definition and label distinction, not personalized intake targets.
The most defensible practical rule is to evaluate the whole food and the dietary pattern. “Natural” can describe origin; “Added Sugars” describes a labeling category; neither one, by itself, replaces information about serving size, nutrient density, food form, or overall intake.
The Psychology of “Natural”: Why the Word Can Feel Healthier
The natural-versus-added distinction is partly nutritional and partly psychological. “Natural” is a positive cue in food culture. It can suggest purity, simplicity, tradition, minimal processing, or safety before a person has inspected the nutrition panel.
A 2025 consumer study by Radaelli and colleagues found that products carrying a “natural” claim were generally perceived as more natural and healthier in an online experiment with Swiss consumers; perceived naturalness explained the healthiness effect for some products. This is evidence for a naturalness heuristic or health-halo pathway, not evidence that every natural claim has the same effect in every population.
That psychological pathway matters for sugar because origin words are especially persuasive: raw, organic, cane, coconut, fruit-derived, honey-sweetened, and natural can all feel categorically different from “added sugar.” Some of those distinctions are real in flavor, processing, provenance, or regulation. They do not automatically establish a nutritional advantage.
A useful reading habit is to separate three questions: What is the ingredient? How is it counted on the label? What does the entire food provide? That sequence prevents a naturalness cue from answering questions it was never designed to answer.
Label Comprehension: Why Added Sugar Numbers Are Easy to Misread
Sugar labels demand small acts of mental arithmetic and category reasoning. Readers must understand that Added Sugars are nested within Total Sugars, connect grams to a serving size, and resist interpreting a single claim as the entire nutritional profile.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies by Scapin and colleagues found that interpretive sugar-label formats generally improved understanding more than numerical information alone, and some formats influenced lower-sugar choices. The evidence base was heterogeneous, but the direction is useful: presentation changes what people notice and understand.
A U.S. randomized experiment by Khandpur and colleagues likewise found that changing how Added Sugars information was displayed could improve consumer understanding. This helps explain why two people can look at the same grams and reach different conclusions: the label is an information interface, not just a database.
Serving size adds another frame. “8 g added sugar per serving” may feel small until the reader notices that a container contains two or three servings. A large Total Sugars number can also feel alarming even when the food has 0 g Added Sugars. Accurate interpretation requires the category, the serving, and the food context together.
Common Health-Halo Traps Around Sugar
• “Made with real fruit” — tells you something about ingredients, not whether Added Sugars are present or how much Total Sugars the serving contains.
• “No added sugar” — tells you no qualifying sugar ingredient was added under the claim conditions; it does not mean zero Total Sugars, zero calories, or unlimited portions.
• “Natural sweetener” — can describe origin while the sweetener still counts as Added Sugars when used in a product.
• “Organic sugar” — organic certification concerns production standards; it does not move a sweetener out of the Added Sugars category.
• “Raw” or “unrefined” — can describe processing and sensory properties; it does not create a separate metabolic category called natural sugar.
• “Fruit juice sweetened” — may still involve free sugars under WHO terminology and may count as Added Sugars under FDA rules depending on how concentrate is used.
A Practical Decision Framework
When comparing two products, use this sequence rather than asking whether one has “natural sugar.”
• 1. Identify the food. Is it an intact food such as fruit or plain dairy, a juice, a sweetener, or a mixed packaged product?
• 2. Check Serving Size. Decide whether the labeled serving resembles the amount you will actually consume.
• 3. Read Total Sugars. This is the complete sugar amount per serving on the U.S. label.
• 4. Read Added Sugars. Remember that this amount is included inside Total Sugars.
• 5. Check ingredients. Identify the sweetener sources, but do not try to infer exact grams from ingredient order alone.
• 6. Consider food form and matrix. Whole fruit, juice, yogurt, candy, and soda are not interchangeable delivery systems even when some sugar molecules overlap.
• 7. Ignore halo shortcuts. Natural, raw, organic, or fruit-derived can be relevant product facts without settling the health question.
• 8. Use the right framework. FDA Added Sugars is a U.S. label category; WHO free sugars is a broader public-health category.
Evidence Status: What Is Established and What Needs Interpretation
Established
FDA Total Sugars and Added Sugars are defined labeling categories. Added Sugars are included within Total Sugars. Naturally occurring sugars in milk, fruits, and vegetables are excluded from FDA Added Sugars. WHO free sugars include added sugars plus sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates.
Well supported
Label format affects consumer understanding. Systematic-review evidence shows that interpretive sugar labels can improve comprehension, and controlled experiments show that the display of Added Sugars can change how accurately consumers interpret a product.
Supported but context-dependent
Food source and physical form can modify physiological responses to sugars. Controlled-trial syntheses and mechanistic reviews support paying attention to energy context, food structure, fiber, and the source delivering the sugars rather than treating the molecule as the whole food.
Plausible and experimentally observed in specific settings
Naturalness cues can create a health halo. Consumer experiments show that “natural” claims can increase perceived healthiness, but the size and universality of that effect depend on product, population, and context.
Not a sound conclusion
It is not sound to conclude that naturally occurring sugar is always harmless, that added sugar is a special toxic molecule, or that a “natural” sweetener escapes Added Sugars labeling because of its origin.
Common Myths About Natural and Added Sugar
Myth: Natural sugar is chemically different from added sugar
A sugar’s chemical identity does not change because of the label category. Sucrose, glucose, and fructose are chemical compounds; natural versus added describes context and use.
Myth: The body cannot tell any difference at all
The slogan is too broad. The body handles molecules according to chemistry, but people eat foods, not isolated labels. Food structure, fiber, liquid versus solid form, energy density, dose, and meal context can change digestion, satiety, intake, and longer-term outcomes.
Myth: Honey and maple syrup are not added sugar
They are natural-origin sweeteners, but FDA guidance includes sugars from honey and syrups within Added Sugars. WHO includes them within free sugars.
Myth: 0 g Added Sugars means 0 g sugar
No. It can simply mean the sugars present are naturally occurring under the FDA definition. Plain milk and unsweetened fruit products are common examples.
Myth: Fruit juice and whole fruit are the same because both have natural sugar
They share some sugar molecules, but physical structure differs. WHO treats fruit-juice sugars as free sugars, and human evidence supports considering food source and structure when interpreting sugar effects.
Myth: Brown, raw, coconut, or organic sugar becomes natural sugar in a recipe
Those words can describe origin or processing. Once the sweetener is added to another food, its sugars are still added sugars for the relevant labeling context.
FAQ
Is sugar in fruit natural sugar?
In ordinary nutrition language, yes: the sugars naturally present in whole fruit are naturally occurring sugars. On a U.S. Nutrition Facts framework, they are part of Total Sugars and are not Added Sugars merely because the fruit contains fructose, glucose, or sucrose.
Is fruit sugar bad for you?
The phrase is too broad to answer from the molecule alone. Whole fruit has a food matrix that differs from fruit juice, sweetened fruit drinks, candy, and isolated sweeteners. Evaluate the food source and dietary pattern rather than treating fructose in whole fruit as interchangeable with every other fructose-containing food.
Does 100% fruit juice have added sugar?
It can have 0 g Added Sugars when no qualifying sweetener has been added, but it still contains Total Sugars. WHO classifies sugars naturally present in fruit juice as free sugars. Juice products with added sweeteners or qualifying concentrate use can have Added Sugars.
Is honey natural sugar or added sugar?
Both descriptions can be true in different senses. Honey is a natural-origin food, but FDA labeling treats sugars from honey as Added Sugars when honey functions as a sweetener, and WHO includes honey sugars within free sugars.
Is maple syrup added sugar?
Yes in the FDA dietary-labeling sense when it is used as a sweetener. Single-ingredient maple syrup has special label-presentation rules, but it still contributes to the Added Sugars framework.
Is lactose in milk added sugar?
The lactose naturally present in plain milk is naturally occurring sugar, so it contributes to Total Sugars rather than Added Sugars. If a dairy product contains added caloric sweeteners, those contribute separately to Added Sugars.
Is cane sugar natural sugar?
Cane sugar comes from sugar cane, but source alone does not make it naturally occurring sugar inside a finished product. When cane sugar is added as a sweetener, it is Added Sugar. This is the difference between botanical origin and label function.
Is coconut sugar healthier because it is natural?
Natural origin does not establish a general health advantage. Coconut sugar can differ in flavor, processing, and minor components, but when it is used as a sweetener it contributes Added Sugars. Evaluate the whole product rather than the naturalness cue.
Does “no added sugar” mean sugar-free?
No. No-added-sugar and sugar-free are different claims with different regulatory conditions. A product can contain naturally occurring sugars and still qualify for a no-added-sugar claim.
Can a food have more Total Sugars than Added Sugars?
Yes. That is common. Total Sugars include both naturally occurring and added sugars, so sweetened yogurt, flavored milk, and many fruit-based products can show a Total Sugars number larger than the Added Sugars number.
Can Added Sugars ever equal Total Sugars?
Yes. In a product where essentially all sugars come from added sweeteners, the two numbers can be the same or very close, subject to formulation and labeling rules.
Why is there no Daily Value for Total Sugars?
The FDA states that no Daily Value has been established for Total Sugars because no recommendation has been made for a total amount of all sugars to eat in a day. The label instead provides a Daily Value for Added Sugars.
Are free sugars the same as added sugars?
No. They overlap, but WHO free sugars are broader because the category includes sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices, and fruit juice concentrates.
Boundary: Dietary Sugar Labels Are Not Blood-Glucose Targets
Natural Sugar vs Added Sugar is a food-labeling and dietary-classification question. It does not determine fasting glucose, glucose targets, A1C, continuous glucose monitor interpretation, hypoglycemia treatment, hyperglycemia management, or individualized diabetes care. Those are medical glucose-management questions with different evidence and clinical boundaries.
Related Articles
Sugar: What It Is, Types, Uses, Health, and Psychology — the broad English Hub guide to sugar chemistry, types, uses, health context, and psychology.
Sugar Nutrition Facts: Calories, Carbohydrates, and Added Sugars — how calories, Total Sugars, Added Sugars, carbohydrates, Daily Value, and serving sizes appear on labels.
Where Does Sugar Come From? Cane, Beets, Fruits, and Milk — the biological sources of dietary sugars and how source differs from label classification.
Names for Sugar: Common Terms on Food and Ingredient Labels — common sugar and syrup names that appear in ingredient lists.
References
Chiavaroli, L., Cheung, A., Ayoub-Charette, S., Ahmed, A., Lee, D., Au-Yeung, F., Qi, X., Back, S., McGlynn, N., Ha, V., Lai, E., Khan, T. A., Blanco Mejia, S., Zurbau, A., Choo, V. L., de Souza, R. J., Wolever, T. M. S., Leiter, L. A., Kendall, C. W. C., Jenkins, D. J. A., & Sievenpiper, J. L. (2023). Important food sources of fructose-containing sugars and adiposity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 117(4), 741–765. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.023. PubMed
Gonzalez, J. T. (2024). Are all sugars equal? Role of the food source in physiological responses to sugars with an emphasis on fruit and fruit juice. European Journal of Nutrition, 63(5), 1435–1451. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-024-03365-3. PubMed
Khandpur, N., Graham, D. J., & Roberto, C. A. (2017). Simplifying mental math: Changing how added sugars are displayed on the Nutrition Facts Label can improve consumer understanding. Appetite, 114, 38–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.015. PubMed
Radaelli, D., Hässig-Wegmann, A., Román, S., Sanchez-Siles, L., & Siegrist, M. (2025). The misuse of “natural” claims on food products and how they can influence perceptions of naturalness and healthiness. Food Research International, 220, 117094. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2025.117094. PubMed
Scapin, T., Fernandes, A. C., Curioni, C. C., Pettigrew, S., Neal, B., Coyle, D. H., Rodrigues, V. M., Bernardo, G. L., Uggioni, P. L., & Proença, R. P. C. (2021). Influence of sugar label formats on consumer understanding and amount of sugar in food choices: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Nutrition Reviews, 79(7), 788–801. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa108. PubMed
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services & U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2026). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2025–2030, 10th Edition. Current Dietary Guidelines
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label. FDA
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Industry Resources on the Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label. FDA
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) Requirements — Attachment 1. FDA
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Use of the Term Natural on Food Labeling. FDA
World Health Organization. (2026). Healthy diet. WHO