Mixed Emotions: Can Opposite Feelings Coexist?
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 13, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Emotion & Affect Science · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Yes. People can experience mixed emotions, including happiness and sadness, at the same time. A graduation may bring pride and sadness about leaving friends; a difficult farewell may contain grief and gratitude; an uncertain opportunity can evoke hope and fear together. In psychological research, mixed emotions are usually examined as the co-occurrence of feelings with different, sometimes opposing, valences in response to a personally meaningful event. The APA Dictionary of Psychology recognizes mixed emotions as multiple feelings elicited by the same situation.
Experimental studies have found simultaneous reports of happiness and sadness during bittersweet experiences. A meta-analysis of 63 experiments concluded that mixed emotions can be reliably elicited and measured, although effect estimates change with the measures researchers choose. This evidence supports the reality of mixed emotional experience. It also invites careful distinctions among experiences that truly overlap in time, emotions that alternate rapidly, and memories that compress changing reactions into a single retrospective account.
What Are Mixed Emotions in Psychology?
Mixed emotions are experiences in which a person feels two or more emotions during the same meaningful episode, often with positive and negative aspects present together. Researchers sometimes use the expression for any combination of distinct emotions, while narrower definitions require simultaneous positive and negative feelings. Both usages appear in the scientific literature. The essential research questions concern which emotions occur, how closely their experiences overlap in time, what prompts the combination, and how it is measured. For a broader account of the component processes that make up emotional episodes, see What Are Emotions? Psychological Definition, Components, and Functions.
A person may be pleased that a parent is recovering while still frightened about future complications. In the same moment, recovery provides a reason for joy, and uncertainty provides a reason for fear. The feelings can be directed toward related features of the same situation rather than toward separate events. A mixture can also involve two forms of emotional response to exactly the same object: someone may miss a former home while appreciating the freedom that moving has brought.
Mixed feelings vary in intensity, clarity, duration, and subjective texture. Some are vivid and explicitly recognized as two emotions. Others are experienced as bittersweetness, poignancy, tenderness accompanied by grief, or a general sense of being torn. The subjective experience can therefore be more integrated than a checklist of emotion labels suggests. Moore and Martin's 2022 theoretical review argues that understanding this lived texture is a distinct scientific task from establishing whether opposite-valence processes can co-occur. For the distinct construct of intensity, see Emotional Intensity: Why Feelings Vary in Strength.
Can opposite feelings really happen at the same instant?
Research supports momentary overlap, rather than merely rapid succession, under some conditions. In one influential experiment, participants could continuously indicate feeling good and bad with separate buttons. People exposed to disappointing wins and relieving losses sometimes pressed both, providing evidence for simultaneous experience during the measured moments (Larsen et al., 2004). Later experiments combined continuous ratings with open-ended responses, addressing the concern that participants merely complied with a survey's suggestion to report two emotions (Larsen and McGraw, 2011).
The exact meaning of an instant matters. Human reports and instrument sampling have finite temporal resolution. A response collected every second can document overlap within that interval; it cannot settle all philosophical questions about indivisible moments of consciousness. Researchers can make strong claims about overlapping reported experiences while remaining precise about what their instruments capture.
Mixed Emotions, Emotional Ambivalence, and Related Concepts
Everyday language often treats mixed feelings, ambivalence, being conflicted, and emotional complexity as interchangeable. They describe overlapping phenomena but also carry different emphases. Keeping the differences visible helps explain why a person may say both 'I love this' and 'I hate what it means,' or report uncertainty without reporting a vivid positive and negative emotion.
Mixed emotions versus emotional ambivalence
Emotional ambivalence ordinarily refers to positive and negative feelings or evaluations toward the same object, person, action, or prospect. A person may feel affection and resentment toward a relative. Ambivalence can involve an enduring attitude, whereas mixed emotions may refer to a particular brief experience. Research on attitudes also distinguishes simultaneous positive and negative evaluations from the consciously felt conflict that can accompany them. Thus, a respondent can endorse both attractive and unattractive aspects of an option yet feel little internal distress.
The phrase 'I am ambivalent about moving' might describe uncertainty about a decision; 'I feel excited and sad about moving' specifies the emotions involved. Mixed emotions can occur without indecision: someone may decide to move with complete confidence and still mourn what is being left. Similarly, indecision can stem from lack of information rather than from mixed emotions.
Mixed emotions versus mood, affect, and emotional complexity
Emotion commonly refers to a relatively specific response related to an event or concern, while mood is often more diffuse and extended. Affect is a broader term for valenced feeling states and related phenomena. A day described as both generally pleasant and stressful does not prove that opposite feelings were simultaneous in one moment. Our Emotion vs Feeling vs Mood vs Affect article gives the more comprehensive distinctions.
Emotional complexity is an umbrella label used differently across research traditions. It can refer to mixed positive and negative emotions, a varied emotional repertoire, differentiation among similar feelings, or changes in experience across time. Emotional granularity concerns the precision with which a person identifies and distinguishes emotions; it does not simply mean having positive and negative feelings simultaneously. The distinction matters because evidence for one form of complexity does not automatically establish benefits of another (Grossmann and Ellsworth, 2017). See also Emotional Granularity: Meaning, Measurement, and Evidence.
Mixed emotions versus emotional numbness or confusion
Feeling both happy and sad is distinct from feeling emotionally numb, which may involve reduced access to felt emotion. Mixed emotions also differ from being unsure what one is feeling. An individual can be remarkably clear that gratitude and loss are both present. Conversely, someone may report being confused or overwhelmed without identifying two opposing feelings. These experiences can intersect, but research measures and clinical descriptions should preserve their differences.
Why Can Positive and Negative Emotions Coexist?
Many significant situations contain gains and losses, desirable and threatening possibilities, or multiple relationships and responsibilities. Emotional responses track these dimensions rather than obeying a rule that a single event must have one overall value. A person may evaluate the present achievement positively while evaluating the approaching separation negatively. The response reflects several personally relevant appraisals operating within a connected experience.
Multiple meanings within one event
Appraisal perspectives examine how a situation relates to goals, responsibility, control, uncertainty, and expected outcomes. A wedding can simultaneously represent intimacy, anticipation, family change, and the ending of an earlier phase of life. Those meanings give rise to different emotional tendencies. This account makes mixed reactions intelligible without assuming that every emotion has one fixed bodily signature or that all emotional meanings must combine into a single score.
Counterfactual thinking adds another route. A win that could have been greater can produce happiness about gaining something and regret about the better result that was possible. A loss that could have been worse can bring disappointment and relief. Larsen and colleagues' gambling experiments used just these contrasts to show why a middling overall mood rating can conceal concurrent positive and negative reactions.
Positive and negative affect can be partly separable
In one family of models, positive and negative evaluations are treated as partly separable processes. The possibility of concurrent activation follows naturally. Research by Larsen, McGraw, and Cacioppo (2001) examined emotional experiences after a bittersweet film, moving out of dormitories, and college graduation, finding that both happiness and sadness were reported in such contexts.
Other models emphasize the bipolar organization of affect: at a given level of description, pleasant and unpleasant experience occupy opposing positions on a dimension. Russell and Carroll (1999) argued that claims about affective independence depend on time frame, response format, and measurement error. Their analysis remains important because a positive–negative correlation across people or situations is not the same question as what someone can feel in a meaningful episode. Mixed-emotion findings challenge overly rigid either-or descriptions, while the precise structure of affect remains a topic of theoretical and methodological debate.
Our Core Affect: Valence, Arousal, and Subjective Experience article examines valence and arousal as distinct scientific dimensions. Affective valence indicates pleasantness or unpleasantness; arousal concerns activation and energy. A mixed experience cannot be identified simply from high arousal, and a person's calmness does not preclude emotionally meaningful combinations.
The same event can evoke several action tendencies
Mixed emotions may reflect different potential actions. Anger can accompany an impulse to confront unfair treatment; fear can motivate caution; affection can encourage connection. Their coexistence does not require all impulses to be carried out. The pattern may be especially salient when goals compete, as when a person wants independence while also wishing to preserve a close family routine. Action tendencies are theoretical descriptors of motivations, not reliable mind-reading from behavior.
Scientific Evidence: What Experiments Show
The existence of mixed emotions has been examined through films, real-world transitions, decisions, and laboratory tasks. Each paradigm answers a slightly different question. Evidence is strongest for the claim that people can report and experimentally demonstrate mixed positive and negative experiences under suitable conditions. Broader claims about a stable capacity, psychological maturity, or lifelong health require additional types of research.
The original happy-and-sad experiments
In a set of studies published in 2001, Larsen, McGraw, and Cacioppo studied people in emotionally poignant circumstances. Many participants experiencing ordinary situations reported one dominant valence, while participants watching the bittersweet film Life Is Beautiful or approaching life transitions were more likely to report both happiness and sadness. The design connected self-reports with identifiable experiences rather than assuming that ordinary mood adjectives necessarily map to one exclusive state.
The findings do not mean people are always happy and sad at once, or that every moving film produces the same response. They demonstrate that conditions containing distinct positive and negative meanings can evoke co-occurring feelings in a meaningful subset of participants.
Disappointing wins and relieving losses
In the 2004 studies, Larsen and colleagues showed why bipolar scales can obscure emotional mixtures. If a person reports a middle value between good and bad, there are several possibilities: no strong feelings, one mildly pleasant feeling, rapid alternation, or powerful positive and negative feelings together. Using independent and continuous indicators of positive and negative feelings made these explanations empirically distinguishable. Their findings favored concurrent activation in the targeted gambling contexts.
Six further studies of simultaneity
Larsen and McGraw (2011) examined alternative explanations more closely. Continuous measures across three studies found greater simultaneous positive and negative responses to bittersweet stimuli than to control stimuli. In three other studies, open-ended reports supplied converging evidence. Some results persisted when participants were explicitly told that mixed feelings were not expected and among participants who had not previously believed such feelings were possible. This substantially strengthened the experimental case against the idea that the result is only a demand characteristic.
What the meta-analysis adds
Berrios, Totterdell, and Kellett (2015) analyzed 63 experimental studies. Their meta-analysis found a moderate-to-large combined effect of mixed-emotion induction, with a reported standardized estimate of approximately 0.77 using the authors' chosen index. The estimate varied with measurement format: direct subjective reports tended to yield larger effects, while a minimum-of-two-emotions index tended to yield smaller effects. Some sample characteristics also moderated results.
This synthesis supports the robustness of elicited mixed emotions, but its effect size should not be presented as the proportion of all people who experience them, or as a prediction of how often they happen in daily life. Experimental induction and naturalistic frequency are separate research questions.
How Psychologists Measure Mixed Emotions
Measurement is one of the central challenges. An event may unfold over seconds or hours, and measures differ in whether they ask about a remembered episode, track feelings continuously, or sample daily life repeatedly. The operational definition of simultaneity consequently influences what researchers can conclude.
Bipolar versus separate emotion scales
A bipolar item asks a person to locate an experience somewhere between negative and positive. It is efficient for describing a net valence, but the middle response can conflate neutrality with the coexistence of strong pleasant and unpleasant feelings. Separate unipolar items ask how happy the person feels and how sad they feel, each from 'not at all' to 'very much.' This permits positive and negative responses to rise together.
Researchers sometimes quantify a mixture using the minimum of two separate ratings: if happiness is high and sadness is low, the minimum is low; if both are high, the minimum is high. Other indices calculate overlap or use direct ratings of how bittersweet or mixed an episode feels. These methods do not produce identical results; Kreibig and Gross (2017) review their strengths and limitations.
Continuous measures and daily-life sampling
Continuous button presses, sliders, or repeated ratings improve temporal resolution. Experience-sampling designs prompt people during ordinary life and ask about the current moment, offering greater ecological relevance than a single retrospective survey. Daily diaries can capture how feelings change across situations but may miss brief mixtures between prompts.
A continuous measure remains a report about felt experience. Its findings depend on attention, the language of the questions, the response device, and the effort required to express multiple feelings. A diary that asks about a whole day measures a different unit of experience than one asking about the present second.
Why correlation is not the same as simultaneous experience
Suppose a study observes that people reporting more happiness across a week generally report less sadness. That inverse association does not establish that the two feelings never overlap at particular moments. Nor does a near-zero correlation establish that they do overlap. A study of positive–negative affect correlations and co-occurrence found that different indices of mixed emotion were not interchangeable and that bittersweet stimuli could elevate mixed-emotion measures without consistently weakening overall correlations.
The lesson is methodological: co-occurrence must be assessed directly, at a meaningful temporal scale, rather than inferred from group-level associations alone. The same caution applies when comparing trait questionnaires with real-time emotional episodes.
Can physiology or facial expressions prove a mixed emotion?
Psychophysiological signals, neural activity, facial movements, posture, and vocal patterns can supply useful additional information about emotional episodes. Yet no unique physical signature establishes that a particular person is simultaneously experiencing two specific subjective feelings. Multiple emotions share components of bodily activation, and observed expressions depend on context, social setting, and individual variation.
Kreibig and Gross's review identifies objective measurement of mixed emotions as a developing research area. A facial-expression classifier or an AI system may statistically predict labels used in its training dataset; that is different from direct access to private emotional experience. For the broader interpretation problem, see Emotion Recognition: Faces, Voices, and Context.
Everyday Examples of Mixed Emotions
Graduations, moves, and major transitions
Graduating from school can bring pride in completing a long goal, excitement about new possibilities, and sorrow about friendships and routines that will change. A move can carry freedom and homesickness. These are often coherent responses to the structure of the event: one life chapter ends as another begins. The experimental literature's use of graduation and moving situations reflects their capacity to combine real gains with meaningful losses.
Parenthood, caregiving, and family change
A parent can celebrate a child's growing independence while missing a previous form of closeness. A caregiver may feel affection, exhaustion, gratitude, and relief when a demanding period ends. None of these combinations identifies the person's moral worth or quality of attachment. Context determines what an emotion is about, and a mixture should be understood in relation to the actual responsibilities, relationships, and losses involved.
Grief and relief
After a prolonged illness, a bereaved person may experience grief over the death and relief that suffering has ended. Such a combination is intelligible within ordinary bereavement. Relief is a response to one aspect of a situation; sorrow is a response to another. Their coexistence cannot be used to infer indifference to the person who died. The clinical assessment of persistent and impairing grief is a separate question, addressed in the English Hub's overview of grief symptoms.
Nostalgia and bittersweet memories
Nostalgia often connects warmth about the past with longing for what has changed. The balance is variable. In two daily-diary studies and two experiments, Newman and Sachs (2023) found that nostalgic episodes varied in their positive and negative qualities, with different implications for reported well-being. Nostalgia should therefore not be assigned one fixed emotional valence simply because an experience includes fond memories.
Success accompanied by regret
A person offered a desirable job can feel satisfaction and anxiety about unfamiliar demands. Someone may be relieved to finish a difficult project while regretting a missed opportunity. These examples also show how different mental comparisons can organize the same event. Mixed emotions are especially likely to be noticed when the positive and negative aspects both matter personally.
Are Mixed Emotions Normal or a Sign of a Mental Health Problem?
Mixed emotions are part of ordinary human emotional life and are not, by themselves, a mental disorder. There is no general DSM or ICD diagnosis called 'mixed emotions.' Feeling grateful and sad, hopeful and fearful, or relieved and guilty does not by itself identify bipolar disorder, depression, an anxiety disorder, or emotional instability. Clinical judgments depend on wider patterns of symptoms, duration, severity, functional impairment, and the diagnostic criteria relevant to the particular condition.
The word 'mixed' also appears in clinical phrases such as mixed features of a mood episode. Those technical criteria refer to specific mood-symptom combinations and must not be equated with the everyday coexistence of happiness and sadness. The shared adjective does not establish clinical similarity.
Emotional experiences merit professional attention when they accompany persistent suffering, major changes in sleep or functioning, risky behavior, loss of contact with reality, or other symptoms that raise a genuine health concern. That assessment considers the whole situation. It does not convert a complex feeling into a diagnosis.
Are Mixed Emotions Good for Well-Being?
Research suggests that the relation between mixed emotions and well-being depends on context, the type of experience, the outcome measured, and whether the study is correlational or experimental. Some research associates mixed feelings with meaning making or more nuanced appraisal, while other work shows that conflict can be uncomfortable or exhausting. Neither association establishes a universal psychological advantage from experiencing more conflicting emotions.
Berrios, Totterdell, and Kellett (2018) examined links between mixed feelings and eudaimonic aspects of well-being, including meaning. Their findings contribute to hypotheses about the potential usefulness of mixed emotions in some goal-conflict settings, but an association with meaning is not proof that deliberately cultivating mixed feelings will improve mental health for everyone.
Research on meaningful endings illustrates the importance of occasion. Larsen and colleagues (2021) examined how remembering good times near endings can generate a bittersweet response. An emotionally rich episode can be valuable, painful, or both; no simple total of pleasant minus unpleasant affect fully captures what the event means to the person.
A comprehensive review by Moore and Martin (2022) calls for research attentive to individuals and contexts rather than generalized claims that mixed emotions necessarily signal wisdom, resilience, or maturity. The evidence supports understanding the experience in its setting.
Age and Cultural Variation
People differ in the frequency, comfort, labeling, and reporting of mixed emotions. Some cultures and social settings provide familiar language for balancing apparent opposites; others place greater emphasis on maintaining one clear emotional position. These tendencies concern populations and situations and do not determine how any particular person must feel.
Grossmann and Ellsworth (2017) reviewed age, social orientation, and cultural conditions associated with emotional complexity. Evidence varies with whether researchers study momentary experiences, broad retrospective ratings, or emotional differentiation. A life-span review reported inconsistent age-related findings and highlighted the need to consider the context in which feelings arise.
Cross-cultural experiments also show why averages can conceal important distinctions. In a comparison of American and Chinese participants exposed to emotionally conflicting advertisements, Zheng and colleagues (2021) found that cultural differences depended on the stimulus and component of experience measured; discomfort did not follow precisely the same pattern as co-occurrence. It would overstate the evidence to claim that an entire culture experiences mixed emotions in one uniform way.
Cultural norms may also affect whether people feel permitted to report joy amid sorrow or sorrow amid celebration. Interpreting an emotion report therefore requires attention to the person's language, social environment, and the questions asked.
What Makes Mixed Emotions Feel Uncomfortable?
Sometimes opposite feelings fit together naturally, as when gratitude accompanies grief. In other situations they make a choice difficult or challenge a person's expectations about how they 'should' feel. Discomfort may arise from unresolved goals, uncertainty about future outcomes, a fear of disappointing others, or social demands to display one approved reaction.
A person who feels pride and sadness about leaving a team may become distressed when told, 'If this is a success, you should only be happy.' The demand creates a second problem: having to justify a perfectly intelligible reaction. For scientific description, it is useful to separate the original mixture from any conflict over its interpretation.
Not every emotional mixture causes distress. A person may find a poignant memory deeply meaningful or recognize competing feelings without wishing to change them. Research on ambivalence must distinguish the objective presence of both positive and negative evaluations from a separate subjective sense of conflict.
How to Understand Your Own Mixed Feelings
An evidence-consistent practical approach begins by identifying what each feeling concerns. Instead of trying to average the entire experience into 'good' or 'bad,' a person can describe its components: 'I am relieved that the decision is made, sad about what I lose, and curious about what comes next.' This language clarifies the situation and may help communication, although describing emotions should not be marketed as a proven treatment for every form of distress.
It can also help to consider timing. Are two reactions genuinely present together, or does one emerge after the other? Does the balance change when thinking about relationships, practical consequences, or long-term goals? These are useful questions because both the situation and the measurement window shape how mixed experiences are reported.
When discussing mixed feelings with someone else, asking 'What feels good about this, and what feels difficult?' is often more informative than insisting on a single emotional label. A supporter can acknowledge happiness and sorrow together without trying to decide which feeling is the correct one. If a situation involves persistent impairment or serious symptoms, professional care can address those concerns on their own terms.
What Researchers Still Need to Discover
Future studies need better ways to distinguish momentary coexistence from very rapid alternation, to combine subjective reports with appropriately interpreted bodily and behavioral measures, and to examine mixed emotions in representative everyday-life samples. The 2017 methods review identifies the reliability and temporal dynamics of emotion measures as foundational unresolved questions.
Other questions concern how mixtures vary across individual emotions, languages, relationships, social contexts, and developmental stages. Happiness and sadness are the most familiar experimental pair, but joy with fear, affection with anger, and gratitude with guilt may differ in their underlying appraisals and their meanings. Conclusions from one pair should be transferred to another only when the evidence warrants it.
Finally, science needs causal tests of when mixed emotions help people understand trade-offs, recover from setbacks, or make decisions, as well as when sustained conflict increases distress. Establishing that the experience is real was an important achievement; establishing its functions requires context-sensitive designs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you be happy and sad at the same time?
Yes. Experiments using independent and continuous emotion reports document simultaneous happiness and sadness during bittersweet experiences, although the degree of overlap varies by person and situation. Larsen and McGraw's experiments tested several alternative explanations.
What is an example of a mixed emotion?
Feeling proud and sad at graduation is a familiar example. The achievement is welcome, while leaving friends and routines involves loss. Grief accompanied by relief, nostalgia combining warmth and longing, and excitement mixed with fear before a new undertaking are other examples.
What does it mean to have conflicting feelings about someone?
It may mean experiencing positive and negative emotions or evaluations toward the same person, sometimes called emotional ambivalence. Affection and anger may concern different behaviors or dimensions of the relationship. These feelings alone do not establish whether the relationship is healthy, unhealthy, or what decision a person should make.
Is emotional ambivalence the same as mixed emotions?
The terms overlap. Emotional ambivalence usually emphasizes positive and negative evaluations toward one object, whereas mixed emotions can describe a wider range of simultaneous emotional combinations, sometimes occurring during one event. A person can feel both without being indecisive.
Do positive and negative emotions cancel each other out?
A single overall pleasantness rating may obscure the mixture, but subjective reports can reveal both components. Separate happiness and sadness scales frequently describe the experience more fully than a single negative-to-positive scale. Different methods measure different aspects of the episode.
Are mixed emotions a symptom of bipolar disorder?
Ordinary mixed emotions do not diagnose bipolar disorder. Clinical 'mixed features' concerns specified mood-episode symptoms within established diagnostic criteria. A bittersweet experience or simultaneous joy and sorrow provides no diagnosis on its own.
Do mixed emotions become more common as we age?
Research findings are inconsistent across methods and contexts. Some studies find age-related differences under particular circumstances, while others do not. The life-span literature review cautions against a simple age-based generalization.
Are mixed emotions healthy or unhealthy?
Their meaning depends on the situation. Mixed emotions may accompany important transitions and meaningful reflection, but conflict can also be uncomfortable. The scientific literature has not established that more mixed emotions invariably improve well-being or that their absence is a problem.
Is bittersweetness itself a separate emotion?
Bittersweetness is a useful subjective description of positive and negative feeling combined. Researchers disagree about whether some mixed experiences should be modeled as combinations of discrete emotions, blends with a distinct quality, or features of multidimensional affect. The precise classification is still under investigation.
Can AI detect that someone has mixed emotions from their face or voice?
AI can classify observable signals and estimate patterns learned from labeled data. It cannot directly observe a person's private feelings. Facial and vocal cues alone do not establish that two named emotions are consciously co-occurring; valid interpretation needs context and appropriate assessment.
Related Articles
What Are Emotions? Psychological Definition, Components, and Functions — the foundational components and functions of emotion.
Emotion vs Feeling vs Mood vs Affect: Key Differences — terminology needed to distinguish an episode from longer-duration moods.
Positive and Negative Affect: Definitions and Differences — how positive and negative affect are described and measured.
Emotional Granularity: Meaning, Measurement, and Evidence — the separate construct of emotional differentiation.
References
American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Mixed emotions. APA Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/mixed-emotions
Berrios, R., Totterdell, P., & Kellett, S. (2015). Eliciting mixed emotions: A meta-analysis comparing models, types, and measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 428. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00428
Berrios, R., Totterdell, P., & Kellett, S. (2018). When feeling mixed can be meaningful: The relation between mixed emotions and eudaimonic well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(3), 841–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9849-y
Charles, S. T., Piazza, J. R., & Urban, E. J. (2017). Mixed emotions across adulthood: When, where, and why? Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.007
Grossmann, I., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2017). What are mixed emotions and what conditions foster them? Life-span experiences, culture and social awareness. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.001
Kreibig, S. D., & Gross, J. J. (2017). Understanding mixed emotions: Paradigms and measures. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.016
Larsen, J. T., Hershfield, H. E., Cazares, J. L., Hogan, C. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (2021). Meaningful endings and mixed emotions: The double-edged sword of reminiscence on good times. Emotion, 21(8), 1650–1659. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001011
Larsen, J. T., Hershfield, H. E., Stastny, B. J., & Hester, N. (2017). On the relationship between positive and negative affect: Their correlation and their co-occurrence. Emotion, 17(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000231
Larsen, J. T., & McGraw, A. P. (2011). Further evidence for mixed emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021846
Larsen, J. T., & McGraw, A. P. (2014). The case for mixed emotions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(6), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12108
Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.684
Larsen, J. T., McGraw, A. P., Mellers, B. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The agony of victory and thrill of defeat: Mixed emotional reactions to disappointing wins and relieving losses. Psychological Science, 15(5), 325–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00677.x
Moore, M. M., & Martin, E. A. (2022). Taking stock and moving forward: A personalized perspective on mixed emotions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(5), 1258–1275. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211054785
Newman, D. B., & Sachs, M. E. (2023). Variation in bittersweet nostalgic feelings and their divergent effects on daily well-being. Emotion, 23(4), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001137
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3
Zheng, W., Yu, A., Li, D., Fang, P., & Peng, K. (2021). Cultural differences in mixed emotions: The role of dialectical thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 538793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538793