Medical Testing in Anxiety Assessment: What It Can and Cannot Show
Updated: Oct 8
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 30, 2026 · Editorial Policy
No blood test, brain scan, electrocardiogram, hormone level, genetic test, or other medical test can by itself diagnose an anxiety disorder. Anxiety disorders are clinical diagnoses: a clinician identifies a specific pattern of fear, anxiety, worry, panic, avoidance, duration, distress, and functional impairment, then considers whether another mental disorder, medical condition, medication, or substance better explains the presentation. MedlinePlus states this directly for mental health disorders: medical tests do not diagnose them, although tests can sometimes reveal physical conditions that contribute to psychiatric symptoms.
Medical testing therefore has a different job. It can investigate a plausible physical explanation, evaluate a potentially urgent problem, identify a condition that may be contributing to symptoms, or clarify whether a particular medical pathway needs attention. The right test depends on the actual presentation. A person with unexplained palpitations may need a different evaluation from someone whose main problem is months of difficult-to-control worry, and a person with new chest pressure or fainting needs a different level of assessment from someone with a familiar anxiety pattern.
This distinction matters because physical symptoms of anxiety are real, while they are also nonspecific. A racing heart, shortness of breath, trembling, dizziness, sweating, nausea, weakness, or chest discomfort can occur during anxiety and panic, but symptom overlap does not prove that anxiety is the cause. The English Psychology Hub guide to physical symptoms of anxiety explains that overlap in more detail. This article focuses specifically on what medical testing can contribute to anxiety assessment, what it cannot establish, and how to interpret testing without turning a normal result into a psychiatric diagnosis or an abnormal result into a complete explanation.
The Short Answer: What Medical Testing Can and Cannot Show
Medical testing can show evidence of some medical conditions that may cause, worsen, or resemble anxiety symptoms. Depending on the history and examination, this may include thyroid dysfunction, an electrolyte disturbance, a cardiac rhythm problem, a respiratory disorder, a medication effect, substance intoxication or withdrawal, or another condition suggested by the clinical picture. A major review of anxiety diagnosis by Craske and Stein emphasizes differential diagnosis from thyroid, cardiac, respiratory, and substance-related conditions and gives examples of symptom-directed testing rather than a universal laboratory panel.
Medical testing can also help assess acute risk. When a person presents with symptoms that could reflect an urgent physical problem, the immediate question is not whether the person has anxiety. It is whether an acute medical condition requires prompt treatment. For example, the NICE guideline for panic disorder recommends the minimum investigations necessary to exclude acute physical problems when a person presents to emergency care with a panic attack.
Medical testing cannot determine that worry is excessive, establish that fear is disproportionate to a situation, measure avoidance across daily life, show whether anxiety has persisted for the required duration, or decide whether symptoms cause clinically significant impairment. Those are clinical questions. It also cannot distinguish every anxiety disorder from every other anxiety disorder. The WHO ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements is a diagnostic framework based on clinical patterns and requirements, not a list of laboratory cutoffs.
A useful rule is: medical tests answer medical questions. They become part of an anxiety assessment when the history, examination, symptom pattern, medication or substance exposure, or risk profile raises a medical question worth testing.
Medical Testing Is Different from Anxiety Screening and Diagnosis
Three processes are often confused: screening, diagnostic assessment, and medical testing. They can occur in the same appointment, but they answer different questions.
Screening asks whether symptoms may warrant a closer look
A screening questionnaire such as the GAD-7 asks about recent symptoms and produces a score. That score can help identify people who may need further assessment and can help track symptom burden over time. It does not establish a formal diagnosis. A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of the GAD-7 and GAD-2 found useful screening accuracy at several thresholds, but the measures were evaluated as screening instruments against recognized diagnostic standards, not as substitutes for clinical diagnosis. See Plummer et al..
Diagnostic assessment asks what clinical pattern is present
A diagnostic evaluation examines the content and course of symptoms, triggers, feared outcomes, panic attacks, avoidance and safety behaviors, distress, impairment, duration, developmental context, psychiatric history, substance use, medical history, medications, and competing diagnoses. The diagnosis is assigned to the clinical pattern that meets the relevant criteria and is not better explained by another cause. For the broader clinical assessment process, see How Is Anxiety Diagnosed? Assessment, History, and Differential Diagnosis.
Medical testing asks whether a physical process needs to be identified or excluded
Blood tests, ECGs, pulmonary tests, toxicology testing, imaging, and other investigations belong to this third category. Their role is conditional. They are selected because a specific medical explanation is plausible enough to investigate, not because anxiety disorders have a standard laboratory signature. The ADAA Patient Guide chapter on laboratory tests notes that no laboratory test has been found that accurately diagnoses anxiety or depressive disorders, while laboratory testing can help determine whether symptoms are related to a medical disorder.
Why Clinical Context Comes Before a Test List
The phrase “tests for anxiety” sounds as if there should be a standard panel that every person receives. Clinical assessment works in the opposite direction. The clinician first asks what needs explaining, then chooses investigations that can meaningfully change the interpretation or management of that presentation.
The history often contains information that no laboratory test can replace: when symptoms began, whether onset was sudden or gradual, whether symptoms are continuous or episodic, whether they occur at rest or during exertion, whether there is true loss of consciousness, whether there are new medications or dose changes, whether caffeine or other stimulants are involved, whether alcohol or sedative withdrawal is possible, whether there is a known heart, lung, endocrine, or neurologic condition, and whether similar episodes have been medically assessed before.
A physical examination and basic clinical measurements may also matter. Heart rate, rhythm, blood pressure, respiratory findings, temperature, neurologic findings, and other observations can direct testing. These measurements are not “anxiety tests.” They help determine whether a physical problem needs investigation.
The National Institute of Mental Health describes a similar sequence for generalized anxiety disorder: after discussing the history, a provider may perform a physical examination to make sure an unrelated physical problem is not causing the symptoms. MedlinePlus likewise describes physical examination and laboratory testing as ways to check for a different health problem, followed by psychological evaluation when appropriate.
When Medical Testing May Be Considered
Testing is most useful when it is tied to a plausible clinical question. New or unexplained physical symptoms, a marked change from a person's usual pattern, findings on examination, medication or substance exposure, a known medical condition, or symptoms that fit a specific medical differential can all create such a question. The exact threshold for testing depends on the symptom, age, medical history, pregnancy status where relevant, risk factors, and clinical setting.
Testing may also be important when symptoms resemble a medical emergency. Chest pain, severe shortness of breath, syncope, a sustained or clearly irregular heartbeat, focal neurologic deficits, a first seizure-like event, or other acute concerning features require medical assessment on their own merits. An anxiety history does not make those symptoms medically benign.
At the same time, more testing is not automatically better testing. Broad repeated panels in the absence of a clinical indication can generate incidental findings, false positives, cost, additional procedures, and more uncertainty without improving diagnostic clarity. Evidence-based assessment aims for the investigations necessary to answer the medical questions raised by the presentation.
Blood Tests in Anxiety Assessment
Blood testing is the most common form of medical testing people imagine when they ask whether anxiety can be diagnosed medically. The central point is simple: blood can reveal some physical conditions associated with anxiety-like symptoms, but it does not reveal whether a person has generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder, or selective mutism.
Thyroid testing
Thyroid dysfunction is one of the best-established medical considerations because changes in thyroid function can produce symptoms that overlap with anxiety, including changes in heart rate, tremor, heat intolerance, sleep, energy, and subjective nervousness. The NICE thyroid guideline specifically recommends considering thyroid testing in adults, children, and young people with depression or unexplained anxiety. It also warns that acute illness can affect thyroid test results and advises against testing during acute illness unless thyroid dysfunction itself is suspected.
Thyroid testing answers a thyroid question. A normal thyroid result does not prove that symptoms are psychiatric, and an abnormal result does not automatically explain every anxiety symptom. A person can have thyroid disease and an anxiety disorder at the same time, so the result must be interpreted with the history and the rest of the clinical picture.
Electrolytes, glucose, and other metabolic tests
Metabolic abnormalities can sometimes produce symptoms that overlap with anxiety or alter cognition, heart rhythm, weakness, or autonomic sensations. MedlinePlus mental health screening guidance gives electrolyte imbalance as an example of a physical condition that blood testing may identify when mental health symptoms are being assessed. Which metabolic tests are appropriate depends on the presentation, current illnesses, medications, nutrition and hydration context, and examination.
The same principle applies to blood glucose. Symptoms such as sweating, shaking, weakness, palpitations, and confusion can occur with abnormal glucose states as well as during anxiety. A glucose result may identify a metabolic problem; it does not function as a biomarker for an anxiety disorder.
Other blood tests are question-driven
Depending on the individual case, a clinician may investigate other possibilities suggested by the history and examination. There is no evidence-based rule that every person reporting anxiety needs an identical complete blood count, vitamin panel, hormone panel, inflammatory panel, cortisol measurement, or broad micronutrient screen. A test becomes clinically meaningful when there is a reason to suspect the condition it is designed to detect and when the result can change what happens next.
This is also why a commercially marketed “anxiety panel” should not be confused with a diagnostic test. A panel can measure biological variables, but measuring many variables does not create a validated diagnostic signature for anxiety disorders.
Heart Testing for Palpitations, Chest Symptoms, or Episodic Surges
Anxiety and panic can produce a fast heartbeat, forceful heartbeat, chest tightness, chest discomfort, and a sense of breathlessness. Cardiac conditions can produce similar sensations. The overlap is clinically important because the experience of the symptom does not identify its cause.
When the presentation suggests a cardiac question, an electrocardiogram can assess electrical activity and rhythm at the time of testing. The anxiety review by Craske and Stein lists clinical assessment and ECG for cardiac-like presentations, with troponin testing considered in acute cardiac-like pain and ambulatory rhythm monitoring or cardiology assessment used when clinically indicated. These are examples of targeted medical evaluation, not routine tests for anxiety.
An ECG also has limits. A normal tracing does not establish an anxiety diagnosis. It may not capture an intermittent rhythm disturbance that is absent during the recording. Conversely, an incidental ECG finding does not automatically explain the person's fear, worry, panic, or avoidance. Interpretation depends on the symptom pattern and clinical context.
For people with panic-like symptoms, MedlinePlus notes that providers may use blood tests or heart tests to rule out a heart attack or other physical conditions such as thyroid problems. The same source distinguishes this medical evaluation from the mental health assessment used to identify panic disorder.
Breathing Symptoms and Pulmonary Testing
Shortness of breath, chest tightness, rapid breathing, air hunger, and a sense of choking can occur during anxiety and panic. They can also occur with asthma, other respiratory disease, cardiac conditions, infection, anemia, metabolic disturbances, and other causes. Online symptom matching cannot reliably determine which explanation applies.
If respiratory disease is clinically plausible, examination and pulmonary testing may be appropriate. The Craske and Stein review lists pulmonary function testing as a possible investigation when respiratory disease is part of the differential. Pulse oximetry and other respiratory measurements may also be used in acute care according to the clinical situation, but none of these measurements diagnoses anxiety.
A familiar history of hyperventilation during panic should not be used to dismiss a new or materially different episode of severe breathlessness. New severe breathing difficulty, blue or gray discoloration, collapse, or other signs of acute illness require urgent medical evaluation.
Medication, Caffeine, Alcohol, and Other Substance Effects
Some anxiety-like states are caused or intensified by medications, stimulants, intoxication, or withdrawal. This is one reason a medication and substance history is part of assessment. Caffeine, decongestants, some asthma medicines, stimulants, thyroid replacement, recreational stimulants, alcohol withdrawal, sedative withdrawal, and other exposures can be relevant depending on timing and dose.
The most important “test” in many of these cases is the history: what was taken, how much, when, and what changed. Toxicology testing may be useful when a specific exposure is clinically plausible or the history is unavailable or uncertain. Craske and Stein note that urine or plasma drug screening can be indicated in selected substance-related presentations. That is different from universal drug testing for everyone with anxiety.
A substance-related explanation and an anxiety disorder can also coexist. Finding one does not erase the other. The clinician still has to determine the timing, persistence, and pattern of symptoms.
Neurologic and Rare Endocrine Testing
Neurologic conditions and uncommon endocrine disorders can occasionally produce episodic symptoms that resemble panic or anxiety. Their rarity is exactly why indiscriminate testing is a poor strategy. Testing is guided by features that make a particular condition plausible.
For example, actual loss of consciousness, witnessed seizure activity, focal neurologic signs, severe new neurologic symptoms, or a characteristic episodic pattern may lead to neurologic evaluation. A brain scan or EEG would then be ordered to investigate a neurologic question, not to detect anxiety. Similarly, testing for rare catecholamine-secreting tumors is not a routine anxiety workup; it is considered when the clinical picture contains features that specifically raise that possibility.
The anxiety differential review by Craske and Stein places seizure disorders and rare endocrine tumors in a second tier of assessment when there is other evidence for those disorders, when the cause remains unclear after initial investigations, or when symptoms are refractory. That approach captures the larger principle: rare conditions are investigated because of evidence, not because anxiety symptoms are nonspecific.
Can Cortisol, Serotonin, Genetics, Brain Scans, or Other Biomarkers Diagnose Anxiety?
At present, no routinely used biomarker has the sensitivity, specificity, validation, and clinical utility required to diagnose an anxiety disorder in an individual person. Researchers have studied cortisol and other hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal measures, inflammatory markers, neurotransmitter-related measures, neurotrophic factors such as BDNF, heart-rate variability, EEG signals, genetic variants, structural MRI, functional MRI, and other candidates.
This research is scientifically important, but group-level associations are not the same as a clinical diagnostic test. A consensus statement on neuroimaging and genetic biomarkers concluded that none of the proposed biomarkers reviewed was sufficiently specific and adequate as a diagnostic tool. See Bandelow et al.. A later review of peripheral biomarkers similarly concluded that promising findings had not translated into established clinical diagnostic instruments; see Vismara et al..
A broad 2023 state-of-the-field review in World Psychiatry reached the same larger conclusion across psychiatric biomarker research: most candidate measures remain early in development and validation, and the overwhelming majority have not become clinically useful diagnostic tools. For anxiety disorders specifically, some measures may eventually help with risk prediction or treatment selection, but that is different from a blood test that says “anxiety disorder: positive.”
Cortisol deserves special emphasis because it is frequently marketed as a “stress test.” Cortisol participates in the body's stress-regulation system, but a cortisol value is influenced by time of day, sleep, illness, medications, endocrine conditions, sampling method, and other factors. It is not a validated diagnostic test for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, or the anxiety-disorders category. Cortisol testing is appropriate when a clinician is evaluating a specific endocrine question, not as a stand-alone psychiatric diagnosis.
The same caution applies to consumer genetic testing and brain imaging. Genetic variants can contribute to susceptibility at a population level, and neuroimaging can reveal research-level group differences or investigate neurologic disease, but neither currently replaces a clinical anxiety assessment.
What a Normal Medical Workup Means
A normal medical evaluation can be reassuring because it may make the specific medical conditions investigated less likely. What it means depends on what was tested, how sensitive the test is for the suspected condition, when the test was performed, and whether the symptom was present during testing.
A normal result does not mean “nothing is wrong.” Anxiety disorders are real health conditions even though they are not diagnosed by blood chemistry. A normal ECG does not measure persistent worry. A normal thyroid panel does not measure fear of social evaluation. A normal metabolic panel does not measure agoraphobic avoidance. Normal medical tests and clinically significant anxiety can therefore coexist without contradiction.
Normal testing also does not prove that every possible medical cause has been excluded. No finite panel can rule out every physical condition. The correct conclusion is narrower: the investigated conditions were not supported by the available findings to the degree the clinician expected. If symptoms change, new red flags appear, or the original clinical question remains unresolved, reassessment may be appropriate.
What an Abnormal Medical Test Means
An abnormal result requires interpretation before it becomes an explanation. Laboratory reference ranges identify values that fall outside a defined interval, but not every out-of-range value causes symptoms, and not every abnormality is clinically important. Some results are transient, medication-related, physiologic, or incidental.
When an abnormality plausibly explains part of the presentation, treating or investigating that condition may be necessary. Even then, the presence of a medical condition does not automatically rule out an anxiety disorder. Medical and psychiatric conditions can coexist, and anxiety can persist after a physical contributor is corrected.
This is especially important when a person has developed avoidance, persistent worry, fear of bodily sensations, or recurrent panic in response to a genuine medical event. The original physical trigger and the later anxiety pattern can both be clinically relevant.
Why “Rule Out Everything” Is Not a Good Diagnostic Model
Patients sometimes hear that anxiety is a “diagnosis of exclusion,” meaning every conceivable medical disease must be ruled out first. That phrase is too broad. Anxiety disorders have positive clinical features of their own: characteristic fears, worries, panic patterns, avoidance, duration, and impairment. A clinician does not need to test for every rare disease before recognizing a clear anxiety disorder.
At the same time, a clinician should not use an anxiety label to bypass a plausible medical differential. Evidence-based assessment combines positive psychiatric diagnosis with proportionate medical evaluation. The NICE guideline reflects this balance: comprehensive assessment considers comorbid medical conditions, while emergency presentations with panic attacks receive the minimum investigations needed to exclude acute physical problems.
This targeted approach reduces two opposite errors. One is premature psychologizing: assuming physical symptoms are “just anxiety” before medically important alternatives have been considered. The other is endless testing: repeatedly searching for an ever more remote biological explanation after an appropriate evaluation, without addressing an established anxiety pattern that is causing distress or impairment.
Panic-Like Symptoms and the Limits of Online Differentiation
Panic attacks are a particularly important setting for medical differential diagnosis because their symptoms can include chest discomfort, palpitations, shortness of breath, sweating, trembling, dizziness, numbness or tingling, nausea, and fear of dying. Those symptoms overlap with multiple acute medical conditions.
A panic attack is an episode, not the same thing as panic disorder. The English Psychology Hub article Anxiety Attack: Meaning, Symptoms, and Why It Is Not a Formal Diagnosis also explains why the informal phrase “anxiety attack” should not be treated as a diagnosis. For a broader comparison of anxiety, panic attacks, and panic disorder, see Anxiety vs Panic.
There is no reliable online rule that can separate a panic attack from a heart attack, clinically important arrhythmia, asthma exacerbation, seizure, pulmonary problem, or other urgent condition in every case. Age, medical history, examination, vital signs, ECG findings, laboratory data, and the exact course of symptoms can all matter.
Seek urgent medical care for new or severe chest pain or pressure, severe difficulty breathing, fainting, a sustained or clearly irregular heartbeat with significant symptoms, new weakness or numbness on one side, new difficulty speaking, a first seizure-like episode, severe confusion, or another acute symptom that could represent a medical emergency. A previous anxiety diagnosis should not be used as a reason to ignore a new emergency pattern.
How Medical Testing Fits Into a Complete Anxiety Assessment
The medical component is one part of a larger assessment. A complete evaluation asks whether the person is experiencing normal anxiety, a symptom pattern below diagnostic threshold, a specific anxiety disorder, another mental disorder, a medical condition, a medication or substance effect, or some combination of these. For the broader psychiatric, medical, substance, and comorbidity differential, see Anxiety Differential Diagnosis: What Can Look Like an Anxiety Disorder?.
Anxiety disorders remain distinct diagnostic territories. Generalized anxiety disorder is not diagnosed simply because laboratory tests are normal. Panic disorder is not diagnosed simply because an ECG is normal after palpitations. Social anxiety disorder is not established by a high screening score. Specific phobia is not defined by a blood test. Separation anxiety disorder and selective mutism require their own clinical patterns and developmental context.
The broad English Psychology Hub overview, Anxiety Disorders: Symptoms, Types, Diagnosis, and Treatment, explains how the major anxiety disorders differ and why adjacent conditions should not be collapsed into the anxiety-disorders category. Medical testing should be interpreted inside that diagnostic framework rather than used as a substitute for it.
A clinician may therefore reach several different conclusions after assessment: symptoms are best explained by a medical condition; symptoms are best explained by a substance or medication effect; an anxiety disorder is present; both a medical condition and an anxiety disorder are present; or more observation and assessment are needed before the picture is clear. Testing contributes evidence to that decision, but it does not make the entire decision by itself.
How to Think About a Test Result Without Overinterpreting It
A useful interpretation begins with the question the test was ordered to answer. If thyroid testing was ordered because unexplained anxiety occurred with signs suggesting thyroid dysfunction, the result should be interpreted as evidence about thyroid function. If an ECG was ordered for episodic palpitations, it is evidence about cardiac electrical activity during the recording. If toxicology testing was ordered because stimulant exposure was plausible, it is evidence about the substances the assay can detect within its detection window.
Then ask what the test does not measure. Thyroid testing does not measure avoidance. ECG does not measure catastrophic beliefs about bodily sensations. Toxicology does not measure whether recurrent unexpected panic attacks have led to persistent concern or behavior change. Brain imaging does not establish the duration or impairment required for a psychiatric diagnosis.
Finally, interpret the result together with the clinical timeline. A test obtained when symptoms are absent may answer a different question from a test obtained during an episode. A borderline abnormality may require repetition or context. A negative result may reduce the likelihood of one condition without making another condition certain.
Questions Worth Asking a Clinician About Medical Testing
If testing is proposed, useful questions are: What condition are we testing for? Which symptom or finding makes that condition plausible? What would a normal result mean? What would an abnormal result change? Does the timing of the test matter? Are medications, supplements, caffeine, alcohol, or other substances relevant to the result? If the test is normal but symptoms continue, what is the next step? These questions turn testing from a search for certainty into a clinical decision process.
If no testing is recommended, it is also reasonable to ask why. In many presentations, the history and examination do not suggest a medical condition that would be meaningfully clarified by laboratory or imaging studies. The absence of testing should reflect clinical reasoning, just as the presence of testing should.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a blood test for anxiety?
No blood test currently diagnoses an anxiety disorder. Blood tests can investigate physical conditions that may cause or contribute to anxiety-like symptoms, but the psychiatric diagnosis is based on clinical assessment.
What blood tests are usually done for anxiety?
There is no universal blood panel for anxiety. Testing is individualized. Thyroid testing is a common example when anxiety is unexplained or thyroid dysfunction is clinically plausible. Electrolyte, glucose, or other testing may be considered when the presentation suggests a relevant medical question.
Can thyroid problems feel like anxiety?
Yes. Thyroid dysfunction can produce symptoms that overlap with anxiety, and NICE recommends considering thyroid testing in people with unexplained anxiety. A thyroid result must still be interpreted in clinical context.
Can an ECG diagnose anxiety or a panic attack?
No. An ECG records cardiac electrical activity. It can help assess cardiac explanations for symptoms such as palpitations or chest discomfort, but it does not diagnose anxiety or panic disorder.
Do normal medical tests prove that symptoms are anxiety?
No. Normal tests can make the specific conditions investigated less likely, but they do not by themselves establish a psychiatric diagnosis and do not rule out every possible medical cause.
Does an abnormal test mean anxiety is not present?
No. An abnormal result may identify a medical contributor or a separate medical condition, while an anxiety disorder can still coexist. The clinical timeline and diagnostic pattern determine how the findings fit together.
Can cortisol testing diagnose chronic stress or anxiety?
Cortisol can be measured for specific endocrine purposes, but a single cortisol result is not a validated diagnostic test for an anxiety disorder. Cortisol varies with many biological and situational factors.
Can a brain scan show anxiety?
Research can detect group-level neuroimaging differences associated with anxiety, but MRI, CT, PET, and other brain scans are not routine diagnostic tests for anxiety disorders. Imaging is used when a separate neurologic or medical indication exists.
Can genetic testing tell whether I have an anxiety disorder?
No current clinical genetic test can diagnose an anxiety disorder. Genetic research identifies susceptibility patterns across populations, but present findings do not provide a stand-alone diagnostic result for an individual.
Is the GAD-7 a medical test?
No. The GAD-7 is a symptom-screening questionnaire. It can help identify possible generalized anxiety symptoms and measure severity, but its score is not a laboratory result and does not substitute for formal diagnostic assessment.
When should anxiety-like physical symptoms be treated as a medical emergency?
Urgent medical assessment is appropriate when symptoms could represent an acute medical condition, especially new or severe chest pain or pressure, severe breathing difficulty, fainting, a significant sustained rhythm disturbance, new focal neurologic symptoms, a first seizure-like episode, or severe confusion. Online symptom descriptions cannot reliably exclude emergencies.
Related Articles
References
Abi-Dargham, A., Moeller, S. J., Ali, F., et al. (2023). Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: State of the field. World Psychiatry, 22(2), 236–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21078.
Bandelow, B., Baldwin, D., Abelli, M., et al. (2016). Biological markers for anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD: A consensus statement. Part I: Neuroimaging and genetics. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 17(5), 321–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2016.1181783.
Chen, E., Montalvo, C., & Summergrad, P. (2024). Chapter 79: Laboratory tests. In Anxiety and Depression Association of America Patient Guide to Mood and Anxiety Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9798894551920.lg79.
Craske, M. G., & Stein, M. B. (2016). Anxiety. The Lancet, 388(10063), 3048–3059. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30381-6.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2011, updated). Generalised anxiety disorder and panic disorder in adults: Management (CG113). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg113/chapter/Recommendations.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2019, updated). Thyroid disease: Assessment and management (NG145). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG145/chapter/recommendations.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Generalized anxiety disorder: What you need to know. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/generalized-anxiety-disorder-gad.
National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Anxiety. MedlinePlus. https://medlineplus.gov/anxiety.html.
National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Mental health screening. MedlinePlus Medical Test. https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/mental-health-screening/.
National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). Panic disorder test. MedlinePlus Medical Test. https://medlineplus.gov/lab-tests/panic-disorder-test/.
Plummer, F., Manea, L., Trepel, D., & McMillan, D. (2016). Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 39, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005.
Vismara, M., Girone, N., Cirnigliaro, G., et al. (2020). Peripheral biomarkers in DSM-5 anxiety disorders: An updated overview. Brain Sciences, 10(8), 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10080564.
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077263.
World Health Organization. (2026). Anxiety disorders. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/anxiety-disorders.