top of page

Psychological Encyclopedia

Matcha vs Coffee: Caffeine, Focus, Anxiety, Taste, and Ritual

Sep 28
17 min read

Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 28, 2026 · Editorial Policy


Matcha and coffee can both provide a meaningful caffeine dose, both can improve alertness, and either can feel pleasant or uncomfortable depending on dose, timing, habit, sleep, and individual sensitivity. Coffee usually contains more caffeine in a typical serving, but there is no universal rule: coffee strength varies widely, while matcha caffeine depends heavily on how many grams of powder are used. Matcha also naturally contains L-theanine, yet the strongest evidence for a caffeine-plus-L-theanine cognitive effect comes largely from controlled studies of isolated compounds rather than from ordinary cups of matcha.


The practical answer is therefore more useful than a winner: choose by the caffeine dose you actually drink, the sensory profile you enjoy, and the routine you can tolerate. If coffee makes you jittery, switching to a smaller-caffeine matcha serving may feel easier, but matcha is still caffeinated and is not reliably anxiety-free. If you want a stronger stimulant effect, a typical brewed coffee more often delivers it. For the broader tea-versus-coffee comparison, see Tea vs Coffee: Caffeine, Taste, Focus, Ritual, and Which Feels Different.


Matcha vs coffee at a glance


  • Caffeine: Coffee is often higher per common serving, but both vary. Coffee varies by bean, dose, brew method, concentration, and serving size. Matcha varies by powder composition and grams used.

  • Focus: Caffeine has established acute effects on attention in healthy adults. L-theanine plus caffeine may add small benefits on some tasks, but that evidence is not the same as proving that every matcha serving outperforms coffee.

  • Anxiety and jitters: Caffeine can increase anxious feelings, especially at higher doses and in sensitive people. Matcha can still do this because it contains caffeine.

  • Taste: Matcha is a suspended powdered green tea with vegetal, savory, umami, bitter, and astringent dimensions. Coffee spans roasted, aromatic, fruity, floral, nutty, chocolaty, bitter, acidic, and many other profiles.

  • Texture: Matcha has suspended particles and can feel creamy or chalky depending on powder, whisking, and concentration. Filter coffee is a liquid extract with a different body and aroma structure.

  • Ritual: Sifting and whisking matcha can create a more deliberate preparation sequence. Coffee can be equally ritualized through grinding, weighing, espresso preparation, pour-over, or a social coffee routine.

  • Best choice: The useful question is not which beverage is inherently better. It is which serving gives you the caffeine dose, taste, timing, and ritual you want without unwanted effects.


Caffeine: does matcha or coffee have more?


For a typical cup, coffee often has more caffeine. MedlinePlus gives a broad reference range of about 95–200 mg for an 8-ounce cup of coffee, while emphasizing that caffeine content can vary substantially between drinks. That range should not be treated as a promise for a particular café cup or home brew. MedlinePlus caffeine guidance explains the serving variability directly.


Matcha does not have one standard caffeine-per-cup number. It is powdered Camellia sinensis leaf dispersed in water, so the amount of powder matters directly. A review of matcha composition describes caffeine and L-theanine as characteristic constituents and explains how shading and processing shape the leaf chemistry. Kochman et al. (2020).


Laboratory measurements also show why a single internet number can be misleading. In one 2022 analysis of three matcha products, caffeine in the dry powders was approximately 14.1–16.1 mg per gram. Those values illustrate product variability; they are not a universal specification for all matcha. Koláčková et al. (2022).


Serving size matters more than the label


A comparison such as “matcha has 60 mg and coffee has 95 mg” looks precise but hides the most important variable: how the drinks were prepared. Two matcha drinks can use very different amounts of powder. Two coffees can differ in ground-coffee dose, extraction, brew ratio, bean species, and final volume. The English Psychology Hub’s detailed coffee-caffeine guide explains these sources of variation in How Much Caffeine Is in Coffee? Bean, Roast, Brew, Serving Size, and Why Effects Vary.


If caffeine is the reason you are comparing the drinks, measure the serving rather than relying on the category. For matcha, that means knowing roughly how many grams of powder you use. For coffee, it means knowing the beverage type and serving size and, when available, the café or product’s caffeine information.


Does matcha release caffeine more slowly?


The popular claim that matcha “releases caffeine slowly for hours” because L-theanine binds caffeine is much stronger than the evidence. L-theanine is studied for effects on cognition and mood, not as a proven mechanism that traps caffeine and steadily releases it from ordinary matcha. A controlled study comparing hot tea, coffee, and caffeinated water found similar salivary caffeine pharmacokinetics when caffeine dose was controlled, although it studied tea rather than matcha specifically. Quinlan, Lane, and Aspinall (1997).


A person can still experience matcha as smoother. A lower caffeine dose, a slower drinking pace, food intake, prior sleep, tolerance, expectation, and the presence of other tea constituents can all contribute to the experience. The accurate formulation is that a smoother subjective effect is plausible for some people; a special slow-release pharmacokinetic curve for matcha is not established.


Focus and concentration: what the evidence actually shows


The most established stimulant in both drinks is caffeine. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in rested healthy adults found that pure caffeine acutely improved both attention reaction time and accuracy. The authors also found that more caffeine was not simply better for every outcome: accuracy showed a nonlinear dose-response pattern. Kløve and Petersen (2025).


This matters for matcha versus coffee because “stronger focus” and “more caffeine” are not interchangeable. A higher caffeine dose can increase alertness and speed while also increasing unwanted arousal. The dose that feels productive to one person may feel distracting to another.


What does L-theanine add?


Matcha naturally contains L-theanine, an amino acid found in tea. Controlled studies of L-theanine combined with caffeine have reported benefits on some measures of attention and mood. A 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis found moderate effects favoring the caffeine-plus-L-theanine combination on alertness and some attentional outcomes during the first two hours after dosing. Camfield et al. (2014).


The newer evidence is more qualified. A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis covering tea, L-theanine, and L-theanine plus caffeine found small-to-moderate differences favoring the combination for some cognitive and mood outcomes, while confidence intervals often showed uncertainty. Crucially, the authors called for more research using tea beverages or tea-equivalent doses in free-living settings. Payne et al. (2025).


That distinction prevents a common evidence error. A laboratory dose of purified L-theanine plus purified caffeine is not automatically equivalent to a bowl of matcha. Matcha contains caffeine and L-theanine together, but their concentrations vary, the ratio varies, and the beverage also contains many other constituents. The evidence supports a plausible caffeine-plus-theanine interaction; it does not support the universal claim that matcha produces superior focus for everyone.


Coffee can support focus without L-theanine


Coffee does not need L-theanine to have an attentional effect because caffeine itself is psychoactive. The relevant comparison is often dose against dose, not ingredient list against ingredient list. If a coffee contains much more caffeine than the matcha serving being compared, it may feel more forceful. If the servings are closer in caffeine, subjective differences may narrow.


For a deeper coffee-specific discussion of attention, concentration, withdrawal reversal, task demands, and individual response, see Coffee and Focus: Does Caffeine Really Improve Concentration?.


Focus is not the same as calm


Feeling calm, feeling alert, and performing better on an attention task are different outcomes. A drink can increase alertness while also making a person feel physically keyed up. It can improve reaction time without improving judgment on a complex task. It can also feel helpful mainly because it reverses morning caffeine withdrawal in a habitual user. This is why “calm focus” is a useful description of an experience but a poor substitute for specifying what was measured.


Anxiety and jitters: is matcha gentler than coffee?


Matcha can be gentler for some people, especially when the matcha serving contains less caffeine than the coffee it replaces. But matcha is not an anxiety-free form of caffeine. A 2026 systematic review of 27 studies in healthy individuals found that caffeine was predominantly associated with increased anxiety symptoms, with evidence of dose dependence and differences related to habitual caffeine use. Nascimento et al. (2026).


A 2024 meta-analysis likewise found increased anxiety after caffeine exposure in healthy populations, with larger effects at higher doses. The included evidence was heterogeneous, so the most useful conclusion is not a single threshold but a dose-and-sensitivity relationship. Liu et al. (2024).


Why coffee may feel more jittery


Coffee may feel more jittery when it delivers a larger caffeine dose, when it is consumed quickly, when the person has little tolerance, when it is taken after poor sleep, or when ordinary stimulant sensations such as a faster heartbeat are interpreted as threatening. Coffee is often blamed as a category when the more direct variable is the caffeine load and the person’s sensitivity to it.


Why matcha can still cause anxiety


Matcha contains caffeine. A concentrated serving can therefore produce the same class of stimulant effects: increased arousal, restlessness, tremor, awareness of heartbeat, gastrointestinal sensations, or difficulty settling. The presence of L-theanine does not make these effects impossible, and evidence from caffeine-plus-theanine cognition studies does not establish that L-theanine neutralizes caffeine-induced anxiety in ordinary matcha servings.


For the coffee-specific evidence and the distinction between ordinary stimulant arousal, anxious feelings, and clinical anxiety disorders, see Coffee and Anxiety: Why Caffeine Can Make Some People Feel More Anxious.


An anxious feeling is not an anxiety disorder


Feeling jittery after caffeine is an acute response, not a diagnosis. Anxiety symptoms can occur in people without an anxiety disorder, and a person with an anxiety disorder can also tolerate caffeine without an obvious problem. A beverage reaction does not identify a psychiatric condition, and matcha or coffee should not be presented as treatment for anxiety disorders.


Sleep can change the next day’s comparison


Caffeine’s effect is not limited to the hours when it feels strongest. A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis found that caffeine reduced total sleep time and sleep efficiency and increased sleep-onset latency. The authors estimated that a coffee containing 107 mg caffeine would need to be consumed about 8.8 hours before bedtime to avoid reducing total sleep time on average, while individual responses vary. Gardiner et al. (2023).


This creates an important feedback loop. A person who drinks coffee late, sleeps worse, and then feels more anxious or needs more caffeine the next morning may conclude that coffee itself is uniquely harsh. If the same person drinks less-caffeinated matcha earlier, the next day may feel better partly because the total caffeine dose and timing changed. The beverage identity and the caffeine schedule need to be separated.


How much caffeine is too much?


Population-level safety guidance is not a personal comfort threshold. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration cites 400 mg of caffeine per day as an amount not generally associated with negative effects for most adults, while emphasizing that sensitivity varies with body size, medications, medical conditions, and individual response. FDA guidance.


The European Food Safety Authority similarly states that single doses up to 200 mg and daily intakes up to 400 mg do not raise safety concerns for the general healthy adult population, while a single 100 mg dose may affect sleep in some adults when consumed close to bedtime. EFSA gives different guidance for pregnancy. EFSA caffeine guidance.


These numbers should not be turned into advice that everyone should consume 400 mg. A person can experience unpleasant anxiety, tremor, palpitations, headache, or sleep disruption at much lower doses. When comparing matcha with coffee for daily use, the practical target is the lowest caffeine dose that produces the wanted effect without unwanted effects.


Taste: matcha and coffee are fundamentally different sensory experiences


The two beverages do not merely differ in caffeine. Their raw materials, processing, aroma chemistry, texture, and taste structure are different. This can matter as much as stimulation because a daily beverage is repeated sensory experience, not a delivery system for one molecule.


What matcha tastes like


Matcha can combine umami, vegetal and grassy notes, sweetness, bitterness, and astringency. The balance depends on leaf material, cultivation, processing, storage, powder dose, water temperature, and preparation. Molecular and sensory work on Japanese green tea has identified compounds that contribute to umami, while research on green-tea taste shows that caffeine contributes bitterness, EGCG contributes bitterness and astringency, and glutamic acid contributes umami. Kaneko et al. (2006) and Scharbert et al.-linked green-tea sensory research provide direct sensory evidence.


Astringency is especially important to distinguish from bitterness. Bitterness is a taste quality. Astringency is a drying, puckering tactile sensation produced through oral interactions, so a matcha can be moderately bitter yet strongly astringent, or the reverse. Temperature and concentration can shift both.


What coffee tastes like


Coffee cannot be reduced to “bitter.” Origin, species, processing, roast, grind, water, extraction, and serving style can produce floral, fruity, fermented, nutty, chocolate, caramel, spicy, smoky, roasty, acidic, bitter, and savory impressions. A 2025 review of coffee bitterness describes multiple classes of bitterants and emphasizes the roles of variety, ripeness, processing, roasting, brewing, and individual perception. Hu et al. (2025).


Coffee acidity is also chemically and perceptually complex. A systematic review and meta-analysis of coffee acids found large compositional variation with species and roast, underscoring why “coffee is acidic” does not describe the full sensory profile. Yeager et al. (2023).


Why acquired preference matters


A first sip and a hundredth sip are not the same psychological event. Familiarity, learned associations, preparation skill, and expectation can change what a person notices and values. This does not alter the beverage’s molecules, but it can alter attention to aroma, interpretation of bitterness, and whether a sensory feature is experienced as complex, comforting, harsh, or strange.


This is one reason switching from coffee to matcha is not just a stimulant substitution. Someone who loves roasted coffee aroma may initially experience matcha’s vegetal and umami profile as alien. Someone who dislikes coffee bitterness may prefer matcha, while another person may find matcha’s marine, grassy, or astringent qualities harder to acquire. Preference is a result, not a defect in the drinker or the beverage.


The “energy curve”: what may really make matcha feel smoother


Online matcha comparisons frequently draw two curves: a sharp coffee spike and crash versus a flat matcha line lasting for hours. That picture is memorable, but it oversimplifies several different processes.


  • Dose: A matcha serving often contains less caffeine than a large brewed coffee. Less caffeine can mean less pronounced stimulation and a less noticeable decline.

  • Rate of drinking: A small coffee may be consumed quickly, while matcha may be sipped more slowly. Intake speed changes the subjective timeline.

  • Tolerance and withdrawal: Habitual caffeine users can interpret withdrawal relief as an unusually strong morning benefit.

  • Sleep debt: The same dose can feel different after excellent sleep and after a short night.

  • Food and context: Drinking with breakfast, during focused work, or while rushing can change bodily sensations and their interpretation.

  • Tea constituents: L-theanine plus caffeine has evidence for some cognitive and mood outcomes, but this is not proof of a universal slow-release mechanism.

  • Expectation: If a person expects matcha to feel calm and coffee to feel intense, expectation may influence which sensations become salient. This is a plausible interpretive contribution rather than evidence that expectation overrides pharmacology.


The strongest correction is simple: caffeine is still caffeine. Matcha is not a time-release drug formulation. A smoother experience can be real without requiring a special absorption story.


Ritual: whisking matcha and brewing coffee do different psychological work


Preparation changes the experience before caffeine enters the bloodstream. Matcha may involve measuring powder, sifting, adding water, whisking, watching foam form, and drinking from a bowl or cup. Coffee may involve grinding beans, weighing, tamping espresso, controlling a pour-over, pressing a French press, or pressing a button on an automatic machine. These sequences create different sensory cues, timing, hand movements, and expectations.


Experimental work outside tea and coffee specifically has found that ritualized actions can increase involvement, savoring, and perceived value during consumption. In four experiments, ritualized behavior enhanced enjoyment of foods and drinks compared with nonritualized consumption. Vohs et al. (2013). Applying that result to a particular matcha or coffee routine is a plausible psychological interpretation rather than direct evidence that one beverage ritual is superior.


Everyday matcha is not the same as Japanese tea ceremony


Whisking matcha at home should not automatically be labeled a Japanese tea ceremony. Formal chanoyu is a historically developed cultural practice with its own traditions, utensils, etiquette, spatial organization, seasonality, hospitality, and schools. Everyday matcha preparation can borrow tools or techniques without becoming chanoyu. For the wider cultural context, see Japanese Tea: Green Tea, Matcha, Sencha, Gyokuro, and Tea Culture.


Coffee ritual can be just as deliberate


Coffee is often described as the fast option, but this depends on the method. Espresso dialing, hand grinding, weighing a pour-over, smelling freshly ground beans, and visiting the same café can be highly structured rituals. Conversely, matcha can be made in under a minute with a shaker. The psychological difference comes from the actual routine, not a stereotype that matcha is mindful and coffee is rushed.


Which is better for different goals?


If you want a stronger typical caffeine dose


Coffee is usually the more predictable direction, especially when you choose a known brewed-coffee or espresso preparation with available caffeine information. “Usually” matters because a small coffee can contain less caffeine than a heavily dosed matcha.


If you want less caffeine but do not want to quit caffeine


A modest matcha serving can work if it actually contains less caffeine than the coffee it replaces. Measure powder and compare serving sizes. Do not assume the word matcha automatically means low caffeine.


If you are sensitive to jitters or anxious arousal


Compare caffeine dose first. A lower dose, slower consumption, earlier timing, and avoiding caffeine after poor sleep may matter more than choosing a beverage by name. Matcha may feel better for some people, but the evidence does not support calling it jitter-proof.


If you want focus for cognitively demanding work


Caffeine has evidence for acute attention, and caffeine plus L-theanine has evidence for some additional cognitive effects. The most defensible strategy is still individualized: use enough caffeine to help alertness without producing distractibility, tension, or later sleep disruption. More stimulation is not identical to better cognition.


If taste is the priority


Choose the sensory world you want. Matcha emphasizes green-tea umami, vegetal aroma, astringency, and suspended-powder texture. Coffee offers a wider roast-and-origin flavor spectrum and can be brewed across many extraction styles. Neither sensory system is intrinsically more sophisticated.


If ritual is the priority


Choose the preparation you want to repeat. The better ritual is the one that fits your morning, your tools, your social context, and your appetite for hands-on preparation. A ritual gains meaning through repetition and attention, not through the beverage’s marketing category.


Switching from coffee to matcha: a practical evidence-based approach


If you drink coffee every day and want to test matcha, change one variable at a time. Otherwise, a reduction in caffeine, a new breakfast, a different wake time, and a new drink all happen together and you cannot tell what caused the difference.


  • Record your usual coffee type, serving size, and approximate caffeine when available.

  • Use a measured amount of matcha powder rather than an unspecified scoop.

  • Keep the time of day similar during the comparison.

  • Avoid changing sleep schedule, meal timing, and several other stimulants at the same time if your goal is to compare subjective effects.

  • Notice alertness, task performance, restlessness, heart awareness, stomach sensations, and sleep separately rather than collapsing them into “energy.”

  • If you cut caffeine sharply after regular use, remember that withdrawal can include headache, fatigue, and reduced alertness. A bad first day without the old coffee dose does not automatically mean matcha is ineffective.

  • If caffeine repeatedly produces marked palpitations, severe anxiety, or other concerning symptoms, the sensible question is not which caffeinated drink is superior but whether your caffeine exposure needs review with a qualified clinician.


Common matcha-vs-coffee claims: evidence check


“Matcha has less caffeine than coffee”


Often true for common servings, but not guaranteed. Coffee and matcha both vary enough that serving-specific numbers are better than category assumptions.


“Matcha gives six hours of slow-release energy”


Not established as a general pharmacokinetic fact. Caffeine persists for hours in either drink. Matcha may feel smoother because of dose, drinking pace, context, individual sensitivity, and possible interactions with other tea constituents.


“L-theanine cancels the jitters”


Too strong. Caffeine-plus-L-theanine research supports some cognitive and mood effects, but does not establish that ordinary matcha prevents caffeine-related anxiety or jitters in everyone.


“Coffee is better for productivity because it is stronger”


Strength of stimulation and productivity are different outcomes. Higher caffeine can improve alertness and reaction speed while also increasing tension or harming later sleep. Productivity depends on the task, dose, sleep, timing, and person.


“Matcha is better for anxiety”


This can be a personal experience, especially after replacing a higher-caffeine coffee with a lower-caffeine matcha. It is not a clinical treatment claim. Matcha still contains caffeine and can increase anxious arousal in sensitive people.


“Coffee tastes bitter; matcha tastes smooth”


Both are oversimplifications. Coffee bitterness varies enormously with roast, bean, extraction, and individual perception. Matcha can be sweet and umami-rich, but it can also be distinctly bitter and astringent depending on leaf material and preparation.


FAQ


Does matcha have more caffeine than coffee?


Usually a typical brewed coffee contains more caffeine than a typical matcha serving, but there is no universal rule. Coffee caffeine varies by brew and serving, while matcha varies by powder composition and grams used.


Is matcha better than coffee for focus?


Not universally. Caffeine has established acute attention effects. L-theanine plus caffeine may improve some cognitive outcomes, but most of that evidence comes from controlled ingredient studies rather than ordinary matcha servings.


Is matcha less likely to cause anxiety than coffee?


It may feel gentler when the matcha serving contains less caffeine, but matcha can still produce jitters or anxious arousal. Individual sensitivity and total dose are central.


Does L-theanine stop caffeine jitters?


Evidence does not support a universal claim that L-theanine cancels caffeine jitters. Theanine-plus-caffeine combinations have shown effects on some cognitive and mood measures, but anxiety protection in ordinary matcha is not established.


Does matcha caffeine absorb more slowly than coffee caffeine?


A special slow-release matcha mechanism is not established. Caffeine remains the same stimulant molecule. Differences in serving dose, drinking pace, tea constituents, context, and expectation can make the subjective experience feel different.


Can matcha replace coffee?


Yes, if you enjoy the taste and the caffeine dose meets your needs. If your goal is to eliminate caffeine, matcha is not a caffeine-free replacement.


Which is better before work or studying?


The better option is the one that provides enough alertness without excessive arousal or later sleep disruption. Coffee often supplies more caffeine; matcha supplies caffeine plus tea constituents including L-theanine.


Which is better if I am caffeine-sensitive?


Choose by measured caffeine dose rather than beverage reputation. A small matcha may be easier to tolerate than a large coffee, but a strong matcha can still be uncomfortable for a caffeine-sensitive person.


Why does matcha feel calmer than coffee for some people?


Possible contributors include a lower caffeine dose, slower drinking, theanine-caffeine interactions, ritual, expectation, and context. The feeling can be real without proving a universal pharmacokinetic difference.


What is the main taste difference between matcha and coffee?


Matcha is a powdered green-tea drink with vegetal, umami, bitter, astringent, and sometimes sweet qualities. Coffee is a roasted-bean extract with a broad aroma spectrum that can include fruit, flowers, nuts, chocolate, caramel, roast, bitterness, and acidity.


Is whisking matcha the same as Japanese tea ceremony?


No. Everyday matcha preparation and formal chanoyu are distinct. Chanoyu is a historically developed cultural practice with specific traditions, etiquette, utensils, space, seasonality, and hospitality.


Is matcha healthier than coffee?


That question is broader than this comparison and has no single answer. Both are complex beverages. Health outcomes depend on dose, preparation, additions such as sugar and cream, overall diet, and the specific outcome being studied.







References


  • Camfield, D. A., Stough, C., Farrimond, J., & Scholey, A. B. (2014). Acute effects of tea constituents L-theanine, caffeine, and epigallocatechin gallate on cognitive function and mood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrition Reviews, 72(8), 507–522. DOI: 10.1111/nure.12120. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24946991/

  • European Food Safety Authority. (2015). Caffeine. Scientific safety guidance and summary. https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/caffeine

  • Gardiner, C., Weakley, J., Burke, L. M., et al. (2023). The effect of caffeine on subsequent sleep: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 69, 101764. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101764. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36870101/

  • Hu, G.-L., Alafifi, J. H., Quan, C.-X., Al-Romaima, A., & Qiu, M.-H. (2025). Exploring the complexities of bitterness: a comprehensive review of methodologies, bitterants, and influencing factors centered around coffee beverage. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 65(34), 8860–8876. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2025.2512220. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40460304/

  • Kaneko, S., Kumazawa, K., Masuda, H., Henze, A., & Hofmann, T. (2006). Molecular and sensory studies on the umami taste of Japanese green tea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 54(7), 2688–2694. DOI: 10.1021/jf0525232. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16569062/

  • Kløve, K., & Petersen, A. (2025). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the acute effect of caffeine on attention. Psychopharmacology, 242(9), 1909–1930. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-025-06775-1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40335666/

  • Kochman, J., Jakubczyk, K., Antoniewicz, J., Mruk, H., & Janda, K. (2020). Health benefits and chemical composition of matcha green tea: A review. Molecules, 26(1), 85. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26010085. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33375458/

  • Koláčková, T., Sumczynski, D., Minařík, A., Yalçin, E., & Orsavová, J. (2022). The effect of in vitro digestion on matcha tea active components and antioxidant activity. Antioxidants, 11(5), 889. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11050889. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35624753/

  • Liu, C., Wang, L., Zhang, C., et al. (2024). Caffeine intake and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1270246. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1270246. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38362247/

  • MedlinePlus. Caffeine. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://medlineplus.gov/caffeine.html

  • Nascimento, A. O. do, Silva, C. E. C. da, Silva, M. L. da, & Cunha, K. da C. (2026). The effects of caffeine on anxiety behavior in healthy individuals: A systematic review of the literature. Stress and Health, 42(1), e70139. DOI: 10.1002/smi.70139. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41549915/

  • Payne, E. R., Aceves-Martins, M., Dubost, J., Greyling, A., & de Roos, B. (2025). Effects of tea or its bioactive compounds L-theanine or L-theanine plus caffeine on cognition, sleep, and mood in healthy participants: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrition Reviews, 83(10), 1873–1891. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaf054. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40314930/

  • Quinlan, P., Lane, J., & Aspinall, L. (1997). Effects of hot tea, coffee and water ingestion on physiological responses and mood: the role of caffeine, water and beverage type. Psychopharmacology, 134(2), 164–173. DOI: 10.1007/s002130050438. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9399380/

  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine Is Too Much? https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/spilling-beans-how-much-caffeine-too-much

  • Vohs, K. D., Wang, Y., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Rituals enhance consumption. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1714–1721. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613478949. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23863754/

  • Yeager, S. E., Batali, M. E., Guinard, J.-X., & Ristenpart, W. D. (2023). Acids in coffee: A review of sensory measurements and meta-analysis of chemical composition. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 63(8), 1010–1036. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1957767. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34553656/

 
 
bottom of page