Living With Functional Neurological Disorder: Work, School, and Daily Function

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Somatic Symptom & Functional Disorders · Written by Artificial Sapiens

Living with functional neurological disorder (FND) means managing genuine neurological symptoms while preserving access to daily activities, education, employment, relationships, and community life. The central practical question is how to make participation possible when movement, sensation, speech, awareness, fatigue, pain, or cognitive performance can change from day to day. An effective plan combines appropriate medical follow-up, individualized rehabilitation, activity and safety planning, and adjustments to the environments in which the person lives.

This guide addresses daily function rather than repeating the full diagnostic or treatment manual. For the clinical overview, see Functional Neurological Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment; for the basis of diagnosis, see Functional Neurological Disorder Diagnosis: Positive Signs and Medical Assessment. Practical strategies here are options to discuss with qualified clinicians and relevant school or workplace staff, not individualized medical, legal, or rehabilitation instructions.

What does living with FND involve?

FND is a clinical disorder involving neurological symptoms such as weakness, altered movement, seizure-like episodes, sensory changes, or other functional symptoms. Diagnosis depends on the relevant clinical findings, including positive signs of altered neurological function when applicable, and an appropriate neurological assessment. The symptoms are involuntary and can produce substantial disability. Having FND does not establish that every present or future symptom has the same cause; another neurological or medical disorder may also be present.

Everyday functioning is broader than symptom severity. A person might walk comfortably at home yet struggle with crowded commuting, complete short concentration tasks but have difficulty with sustained study, or manage personal care in the morning yet find cooking and evening commitments difficult. Clinicians call these distinct dimensions impairment, activity limitation, and participation restriction. Work attendance, schooling, self-care, and social involvement are meaningful outcomes in their own right, a point supported by the 2025 systematic review of prognostic factors.

Symptoms may fluctuate across contexts and time. Variation can reflect several interacting factors, including sleep, intercurrent illness, exertion, sensory load, attention, symptom-specific mechanisms, coexisting conditions, and the demands of a task. A pattern of variability is compatible with FND but does not replace clinical evaluation. It is rarely useful to infer a single psychological cause from a difficult day.

Patients commonly report disruptions to identity, employment, relationships, finances, and confidence in health care. A 2025 qualitative systematic review identified uncertainty, burden, losses, trust, and strained relationships among recurrent experiences. These findings describe themes across selected studies; they do not prescribe how an individual must feel or imply that psychological distress caused their neurological symptoms.

Start with a functioning-focused care plan

A living plan begins with a clinical explanation that the person understands, an inventory of current needs, and a small set of meaningful participation goals. A neurologist or another suitably qualified clinician should explain the diagnosis and what was found on examination, identify relevant medical comorbidities, and state which new symptoms warrant reassessment. The care team can then determine which physical, occupational, psychological, speech-language, school, or vocational services are appropriate.

Instead of setting one global objective such as 'get back to normal,' identify observable tasks. Examples include preparing breakfast safely three days a week, traveling to a lecture with planned rest points, sustaining a specific computer task with breaks, or returning to a chosen social activity. Record what helped, the type of assistance needed, and whether the activity was sustainable afterward. These are shared planning measures, not diagnostic tests.

The occupational therapy consensus recommendations for FND emphasize education, functional activity, and self-management within coordinated rehabilitation. Occupational therapy in this setting concerns meaningful occupations in the widest sense: dressing, bathing, cooking, child care, studying, earning income, leisure, and living independently. Planning should respect patient priorities rather than use employment or school attendance as a universal definition of success.

Where several professionals are involved, appoint a practical point of contact and share a concise care summary, with consent. It can describe the established diagnosis, medically relevant comorbidities, the patient's typical symptoms, effective approaches, emergency considerations, current therapies, medications, and next review date. Coordinated communication reduces repeated storytelling and inconsistent advice.

Daily routines: build participation without triggering repeated setbacks

Identify activity patterns and tolerable starting points

For one to two weeks, a short diary can capture activities, symptoms that materially affect safety or participation, sleep, scheduled care, and recovery time. Record enough to notice patterns; intensive symptom monitoring can itself become burdensome. A practical record might show that two successive meetings are difficult, that stairs become unsafe when gait symptoms intensify, or that homework is easier after a predictable rest period.

Choose a starting workload that is feasible on an ordinary day, then review it with the rehabilitation team. Where clinically appropriate, increase complexity, duration, or environmental challenge gradually, guided by functional performance and recovery. This approach is task-specific; it does not mean pushing through severe symptoms, treating a seizure-like episode as an exercise opportunity, or assuming every fluctuation is harmless.

Pacing and graded activity have different jobs

Pacing helps distribute effort and reduce disruptive cycles of doing too much on a better day and being unable to participate afterward. Graded activity gradually rebuilds capacity and confidence for selected tasks. These strategies can coexist, but they require adaptation when someone also has conditions characterized by post-exertional symptom exacerbation or other medical constraints. No single pacing schedule or activity quota has been proved effective for every FND subtype.

Use planned breaks before exhaustion, divide complex errands into smaller stages, alternate cognitively demanding and routine tasks, and protect necessary recovery time. Maintain activities that matter personally even when their form changes. An occupational therapist can help distinguish a useful adaptation from one that inadvertently creates new limitations, and can coordinate the plan with physiotherapy or other treatment.

Movement, transfers, and walking

Functional motor symptoms can affect walking, balance, tremor, limb control, and transfers. Specialist physiotherapy may use individualized movement retraining, automatic movement, attention strategies, and practice in real tasks. The physiotherapy consensus recommendation describes this clinical approach while acknowledging the need for stronger evidence on particular components.

Safety remains essential. Evaluate stairs, bathroom floors, cooking areas, transport, and other places where a fall or sudden loss of control could cause harm. A clinician or occupational therapist can advise on handrails, seating, supervised practice, or temporary equipment. Mobility aids should be assessed individually: for some people they protect safe participation, while unnecessary or poorly selected devices may create additional problems. Decisions about reducing or changing aids belong in a supervised rehabilitation plan.

The large Physio4FMD randomized trial found no statistically significant difference in its primary self-reported physical-functioning outcome at 12 months between specialist physiotherapy and usual neurophysiotherapy. Some secondary patient-rated outcomes favored specialist treatment. This is a reason to discuss realistic goals and individual response, rather than promise a particular recovery rate.

Fatigue, sleep, and cognitive load

Fatigue can influence physical and cognitive participation, but it is nonspecific and may reflect sleep disorders, medication effects, pain, mood conditions, medical illness, or coexisting fatigue syndromes. Persistent or changing fatigue deserves an appropriate clinical review. Practical responses include regular sleep opportunities, simpler task sequencing, scheduled breaks, accessible seating, and reducing unnecessary multitasking.

For concentration or memory difficulties, use one-step written instructions, a calendar, reminders, clearly named files, reduced interruptions, and repetition of key information. A sudden or progressive decline in cognition, confusion, or altered awareness requires medical evaluation rather than automatic attribution to FND. The diagnostic and management questions of functional cognitive disorder also require qualified assessment.

Pain, sensory symptoms, and speech changes

Pain, altered sensation, dizziness, sound sensitivity, or speech difficulties can coexist with FND and complicate participation. Pain or autonomic symptoms may also reflect independent medical conditions. Treatment should therefore address the relevant conditions in parallel. Adjust lighting or noise when necessary, use clear communication channels, and consider speech-language therapy when functional voice or communication symptoms are present.

When speech becomes difficult during an episode, a prearranged alternative—text messages, a communication card, or a short written explanation—can preserve autonomy. The goal is meaningful communication without escalating distress. An individually useful adaptation need not be permanent; review it as needs and abilities change.

Living independently: home, self-care, and family roles

Everyday independence includes washing, dressing, eating, medication organization, meal preparation, laundry, shopping, finances, transportation, and child or dependent care. Identify which tasks are currently safe, which require adaptation, and which require another person's assistance. A home assessment can prioritize changes that protect both participation and safety.

Simple arrangements can lower the burden of frequent decisions: place essential objects within reach, use a stable chair for selected tasks, prepare meals in manageable steps, and arrange frequently used supplies consistently. For tasks involving heat, sharp equipment, stairs, or bathing, make an individualized safety plan where loss of awareness, weakness, or unsteadiness is possible.

Being able to perform an action once does not establish that it can be repeated for an entire workday. Functional assessments should consider consistency, duration, safety, recovery, and context. Equally, needing assistance during a difficult period does not determine long-term independence. Support can change with recovery and circumstance.

Family and partners can contribute by respecting the clinical diagnosis, listening to the person's priorities, helping coordinate appointments when invited, and supporting agreed functional goals. Helpful support balances practical assistance with opportunities for self-direction. Avoid pressuring the person to prove symptoms or to exceed an agreed safety plan.

Working with FND: job tasks, accommodations, and disclosure

Evaluate the job's actual demands

Employment planning should begin with the essential functions of the particular job, not assumptions about the diagnostic label. Consider walking distances, standing, fine-motor tasks, keyboard use, screen time, noise, customer interactions, shift length, commuting, working at heights, driving, and responsibility for others' immediate safety. Identify which specific demands are disrupted, what the person can currently do reliably, and which changes may help.

Possible accommodations include a predictable schedule, phased hours, scheduled breaks, workstation adjustments, a quieter work area, written instructions, reduced unnecessary transitions, remote or hybrid duties when compatible with the role, and leave for treatment or symptom exacerbations. The best selection depends on documented functional limitations and the job, and should be reviewed with the individual.

For example, a person with variable gait symptoms whose essential tasks involve computer analysis might benefit from an accessible route, reduced commuting, and flexible break times. A person with communication episodes in a customer-facing role might benefit from an agreed backup communication procedure. A worker operating heavy machinery or performing safety-critical duties requires an individualized occupational and medical safety evaluation before duties are resumed.

What does U.S. disability law provide?

In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act may require covered employers to provide reasonable accommodation to qualified employees or applicants with disabilities, unless doing so creates undue hardship. Eligibility and the appropriate accommodation depend on the individual facts, including the impairment's effect on major life activities and the job's essential duties. A diagnosis alone does not mechanically determine eligibility or a particular adjustment. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission describes the accommodation framework.

An employee can request a change verbally or in writing and explain the functional need. Employers may seek limited supporting medical documentation when the disability or need is not apparent. The interactive process should focus on workable arrangements and relevant information, not unnecessary disclosure of an entire medical history. The EEOC guidance for job applicants explains these principles.

The Family and Medical Leave Act, applicable employer policies, state laws, and other employment protections may also be relevant. Medical leave and flexible scheduling are sometimes accommodation options under the ADA even when a specific leave entitlement differs. The U.S. Department of Labor explains the interaction of medical leave and disability-related protections. Rights and procedures vary outside the United States.

How to ask for a workable accommodation

Describe the functional obstacle, suggest a practical adjustment, and agree on a review date. A request might say: 'Because of a health-related mobility limitation, I am requesting a workstation near an accessible entrance and the ability to take brief scheduled movement breaks. I can discuss what documentation is needed.' Another might ask for written meeting summaries and a temporarily reduced schedule while undergoing rehabilitation.

Disclosure decisions can be sensitive. An employee can discuss task limitations and requested changes without sharing every personal detail with colleagues. Human resources or a designated accommodations office may help with documentation, confidentiality, and implementation. If no accommodation is immediately successful, revisit the task analysis and alternatives rather than treating the first trial as the final answer.

Returning to work and vocational rehabilitation

A return-to-work plan may involve reduced hours, different task intensity, planned rest, retraining, or a staged increase in responsibilities. A baseline should be practical and safe. Attendance, symptom interference, sustained task completion, and recovery after shifts are all worth monitoring. Review plans jointly with the person, clinician, rehabilitation provider, and employer as appropriate.

A 2025 systematic review found an association between workforce participation and better health outcomes among adults with FND. This observational association does not show that returning to work itself causes recovery, and it cannot justify denying support to people currently unable to work. Employment can be a meaningful goal while clinical safety, job demands, individual circumstances, and disability rights remain central.

People unable to sustain their previous role may need vocational counseling, alternative duties, retraining, benefits advice, or support to navigate disability-related applications. Eligibility standards are legal and program-specific; treating clinicians can document functional limitations but do not determine every benefits decision.

School with FND: attendance, learning, and age-appropriate support

School participation is part of the care plan

For children and adolescents, FND can interrupt classroom learning, attendance, sports, friendships, examinations, and developmental independence. Care must account for age, family circumstances, symptom subtype, coexisting health conditions, and the student's own goals. An appropriate pediatric medical assessment is essential, and the school plan should be coordinated with the treating team.

A 2024 clinical review specifically addressing school support describes communication between clinicians, families, and school teams; attendance planning; individualized accommodations; and use of 504 Plans or Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) where appropriate. The review provides practical guidance, not controlled evidence that any single schedule or accommodation guarantees recovery.

Where feasible and safe, maintain connection with classmates and valued school activities. For some students this may mean partial attendance, selected lessons, adjusted physical education, a quieter route between rooms, or a supervised place for managing episodes. Plans should adapt to current functional needs, not punish symptoms or imply that a student has complete voluntary control over them.

U.S. Section 504 Plans and IEPs

A student whose disability substantially limits major life activities may qualify for protections and appropriate services under Section 504. Examples of potential adjustments include accessible classrooms, extra time on tests, modified schedules, flexible attendance arrangements, and related services when individually required. The U.S. Department of Education's Section 504 guidance explains that educational needs must be assessed individually.

An IEP is developed under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act when a student meets applicable eligibility criteria and needs special education. A Section 504 plan and an IEP are distinct legal arrangements. A school team must decide eligibility and services through the relevant procedures; FND as a label does not automatically confer either plan. Postsecondary colleges have different disability-access processes and generally use academic adjustments and services rather than elementary-school IEP procedures.

Outside the United States, schools and universities operate under local disability, education, and safeguarding rules. The international clinical principle is consistent: evaluate functional barriers and collaborate on safe educational access, using the protections available in that jurisdiction.

A practical school support document

A concise plan can specify who the student contacts during symptoms, which activities require supervision, an emergency pathway for unfamiliar or concerning events, access arrangements, missed-work procedures, and a communication schedule between school and family. Include the student's preferences and respect age-appropriate confidentiality.

Avoid unnecessary daily demands for proof of symptoms. Teachers should know how the agreed plan works, but they need not receive all diagnostic or family details. Recognize academic effort, peer inclusion, and feasible participation. School refusal, significant anxiety, bullying, sleep disruption, or another medical condition may require separate assessment and support.

College, examinations, and training

Students in higher education or vocational training may benefit from the disability services office, accessible housing and transport, recording or note-taking arrangements, deadline flexibility where authorized, exam breaks, reduced sensory load, or temporary changes in clinical placements. Safety-sensitive professional training requires an individualized competency and safety assessment with reasonable adjustments where applicable.

Functional seizures: daily safety and an agreed response

Functional seizures, sometimes called psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), are involuntary episodes that may resemble epileptic seizures. Functional seizures and epilepsy can coexist. Diagnosis should rest on appropriate clinical evaluation, and video-EEG monitoring may be useful when indicated. Families, educators, and coworkers should follow a clinician-approved episode response plan rather than trying to determine the diagnosis during an event.

A practical plan can clarify how to protect someone from injury, when not to restrain them, who to contact, how to protect privacy, and which events need emergency services. A first seizure-like episode, injury, breathing difficulty, unusually prolonged event, new pattern, or other alarming features deserves urgent assessment according to local emergency guidance. An existing FND diagnosis does not substitute for evaluation of a new emergency.

The American Academy of Neurology's 2026 clinical guideline recommends assessing coexisting epilepsy and psychiatric disorders, respectful communication, shared decisions, and appropriate psychological interventions for functional seizures. It advises clinicians against using antiseizure medications solely for functional seizures without another indication. Patients should never stop prescribed antiseizure or other medications independently; changes require the prescribing clinician's review.

Driving, swimming, bathing alone, working at heights, and machinery operation require individualized safety guidance whenever episodes involve loss of awareness or motor control. Driving laws and reporting rules differ by jurisdiction and may apply regardless of whether events are epileptic. Seek local medical and licensing advice before driving.

Relationships, stigma, and psychological well-being

FND can strain relationships when plans change, symptoms are poorly understood, or care needs shift. Explain what is known about your symptoms, what practical assistance is welcome, and how others can respond during episodes. Agreement on a few specific actions is often more useful than expecting relatives or coworkers to interpret complex neurological symptoms.

A systematic review of stigma in FND found evidence of stigma across personal, interpersonal, and institutional settings and links with quality-of-life burden. Another qualitative evidence synthesis documented uncertainty, loss of control, difficult healthcare encounters, and living with both visible and invisible disability. These are meaningful aspects of care, rather than optional social concerns.

Psychological treatment may help with coping, coexisting anxiety or depression, functional seizures, and symptom-specific treatment goals. The type of intervention should match the person's presentation and preferences. Neither childhood adversity nor trauma is a diagnostic requirement for FND, and an individual explanation cannot be inferred from a population-level association.

Social participation deserves explicit planning. Consider adapted hobbies, occasional shorter visits, accessible venues, transportation alternatives, peer support, and opportunities to maintain friendships without always discussing illness. Caregivers may also need information, respite, and support for their own well-being.

Coordinating physical therapy, occupational therapy, and psychological care

Treatment is individualized according to the symptom pattern and functional goals. Neurologists evaluate clinical signs, diagnostic uncertainty, comorbidity, and important changes. Physical therapists with appropriate FND expertise may work on movement retraining, balance, mobility, and functional motor patterns. Occupational therapists bridge clinical gains to cooking, studying, self-care, employment, and everyday roles.

Speech-language professionals may address functional speech, voice, swallowing, or communication difficulties after appropriate assessment. Psychologists and other qualified mental health clinicians may help with functional seizures, symptom-related fear, adjustment, distress, and coexisting disorders. Pediatric teams integrate school and family considerations. A coordinated plan should explain what each professional is working on, how progress is measured, and when it will be reviewed. Further detail belongs in Functional Neurological Disorder Treatment: Rehabilitation and Psychological Care.

Published consensus recommendations are useful for structuring clinical practice, but they are partly based on expert agreement. Evidence differs substantially among motor symptoms, functional seizures, speech symptoms, and pediatric presentations. Interventions established for one subtype should not automatically be assumed effective for every other subtype.

Recovery, setbacks, and long-term outlook

Recovery can mean symptom remission, a decrease in episodes, improved mobility, a return to school, greater autonomy, or improved quality of life despite continuing symptoms. These outcomes may move at different speeds. A person may remain symptomatic while gaining important participation, or report symptom improvement while continuing to experience financial and occupational consequences.

A 2026 systematic review of prognosis and outcomes found that many adults with motor FND or functional seizures continue to have symptoms over time; outcomes were heterogeneous across subtypes, and pediatric symptom outcomes were generally more favorable. The review also emphasized that function and quality of life do not consistently track symptom change. These are group-level findings and cannot predict any one person's course.

When setbacks occur, review possible intercurrent medical illness, sleep disruption, changed medications, treatment demands, work pressures, practical barriers, and the established rehabilitation plan. A setback may call for temporarily changing an activity level or care approach; it should not automatically be interpreted as treatment failure or evidence that a person is exaggerating symptoms.

Use a few outcome measures that matter personally, such as days attending classes, safely completed journeys, ability to prepare meals, meeting participation, or household tasks done with chosen assistance. Regular review helps distinguish actual gains from pressure to perform a predetermined version of recovery.

When should someone with FND seek medical reassessment?

New or substantially changed neurological symptoms require assessment on their merits. Emergency services are appropriate for possible stroke symptoms such as sudden facial droop, new one-sided weakness or speech impairment; severe head injury; acute severe chest pain; major breathing problems; or other life-threatening changes. New seizure-like events or events that differ materially from an established pattern also warrant appropriate evaluation.

Prompt nonemergency clinical review is appropriate when there is progressive loss of function, repeated falls, new sensory loss, unexplained weight change, major changes in cognition, medication adverse effects, persistent severe pain, new bladder or bowel symptoms, or concern for another condition. Clinicians can distinguish which investigations are warranted from the actual presentation. The presence of FND and a previously normal test do not settle that decision forever.

Urgent mental health support is warranted for immediate risk of self-harm or inability to remain safe. Appropriate assessment of mental health concerns should proceed alongside, rather than replace, neurological and general medical care.

A practical first-month participation plan

During the first week, obtain a clear clinical explanation and written summary of diagnostic findings, list current treatments and other medical conditions, and choose one or two specific participation goals. Make a basic safety plan for any falls or episodes affecting awareness and determine how new symptoms will be evaluated.

In the second week, discuss daily activities with the care team and request any appropriate occupational, physical, speech-language, psychological, or social-work referral. Select a small number of feasible environmental adjustments, such as an accessible study space, reliable transport, short scheduled work breaks, or written task instructions.

In the third week, meet with the relevant workplace, school, or university contact where assistance is needed. Share function-focused documentation, propose specific adjustments, and arrange a review. Maintain the least intrusive records needed to assess usefulness while respecting privacy.

In the fourth week, evaluate whether the plan increased safe participation and whether the effort was sustainable. Revise the workload, supports, and treatment priorities with the relevant professionals. This month-by-month framework is an organizational example, not a validated FND treatment protocol or required recovery timetable.

Frequently asked questions

Can people with FND work full-time?

Some can, while others need part-time hours, accommodations, a different role, rehabilitation, medical leave, or longer-term support. The answer depends on the symptoms, comorbidities, safety requirements, and essential job functions. Functional ability should be assessed individually and revisited over time.

Should someone with FND keep going to school?

Meaningful school participation is generally an important goal for children and adolescents when medically safe and developmentally appropriate. The amount, pace, and type of participation may need adjustment. Coordinated care and individualized school support are more useful than a rigid attendance target detached from the student's needs.

Are FND accommodations legally available?

Disability-related accommodation may be available under U.S. employment and education law when the applicable criteria are met. Eligibility, documentation, and specific modifications depend on individual circumstances, the setting, and relevant law. Other countries have their own systems.

Is fatigue a normal part of FND?

Fatigue is commonly reported but is not specific to FND. It can coexist with sleep disorders, pain, mood conditions, medication effects, or other medical problems. Persistent, worsening, or unusual fatigue warrants clinical review and an individualized management approach.

Should a person avoid walking aids or wheelchairs because they have FND?

No categorical rule is appropriate. Equipment may protect safety, mobility, and community participation in some circumstances. An FND-informed therapist can assess benefits, drawbacks, appropriate duration, and whether changes can be made safely as rehabilitation proceeds.

Does returning to work improve FND itself?

Studies show an association between employment participation and better outcomes, but this does not prove causation. Work can support social connection and meaning, while unsafe or unsustainable duties can create additional problems. Participation goals should be individualized.

Can FND and another neurological condition occur together?

Yes. Coexisting epilepsy and functional seizures are an important example, and other medical conditions can also coexist with FND. An established functional diagnosis never means that new symptoms should be disregarded.

Can stress or trauma make FND symptoms worse?

Stress may be relevant for some individuals, but responses vary and no single traumatic event or emotional explanation is required for FND diagnosis. Clinical evaluation should consider the person's specific history without presuming causation.

What is the most useful way to support someone living with FND?

Treat symptoms as genuine, respect the person's autonomy, ask which help is useful, support coordinated clinical care, and participate in an agreed safety and activity plan. Avoid diagnosing episodes yourself or withdrawing needed medical care.

Related Articles

Functional Neurological Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment explains the clinical entity and symptom categories. Functional Neurological Disorder Diagnosis: Positive Signs and Medical Assessment covers diagnosis and reassessment. Functional Neurological Disorder Symptoms: Movement, Sensation, and Seizures addresses symptom presentations. Functional Neurological Disorder Treatment: Rehabilitation and Psychological Care provides condition-specific treatment context.

References

Bailey, C., Tamasauskas, A., Bradley-Westguard, A., et al. (2025). What are the experiences of people with motor and sensory functional neurological disorder? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2333491.

Borner, K., & Laptook, R. (2024). Supporting children and adolescents with functional neurological disorder in the school setting. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 107(11), 29–33. PubMed: 39467194.

Mavroudis, I., Petridis, F., Franekova, K., Papagiannopoulos, S., & Kazis, D. (2026). Prognosis and outcomes in functional neurological disorder: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review with subtype-specific synthesis and clinical translation. Journal of Neurology, 273, 208. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-026-13748-7.

McLoughlin, C., McWhirter, L., Pisegna, K., et al. (2024). Stigma in functional neurological disorder (FND): A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 112, 102460. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102460.

Nicholson, C., Edwards, M. J., Carson, A. J., et al. (2020). Occupational therapy consensus recommendations for functional neurological disorder. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 91(10), 1037–1045. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322281.

Nielsen, G., Stone, J., Matthews, A., et al. (2015). Physiotherapy for functional motor disorders: A consensus recommendation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 86(10), 1113–1119. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2014-309255.

Nielsen, G., Buszewicz, M., Stevenson, F., et al. (2024). Specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder in England and Scotland (Physio4FMD): A pragmatic, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology. PubMed: 38768621.

Sekine, E. R., Kanaan, R. A., McMillan, J., Oxford, S., & Iles, R. A. (2025). Biopsychosocial prognostic indicators in functional neurological disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 195, 112201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112201.

Szasz, A., Korner, A., & McLean, L. (2025). Qualitative systematic review on the lived experience of functional neurological disorder. BMJ Neurology Open, 7(1), e000694. DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2024-000694.

Tolchin, B., Goldstein, L. H., Reuber, M., et al. (2026). Management of Functional Seizures Practice Guideline Executive Summary. Neurology, 106(1), e214466. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000214466.

U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2025). Frequently Asked Questions: Section 504 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE). Official guidance.

U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Disability Employment Policy. Employment Laws: Medical and Disability-Related Leave. Official guidance.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The ADA: Questions and Answers. Official guidance.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Job Applicants and the ADA. Official guidance.