top of page

Psychological Encyclopedia

Latte vs Cappuccino: Milk, Foam, Taste, Caffeine, and Preference

Sep 28
18 min read

Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 28, 2026 · Editorial Policy


A latte and a cappuccino are both espresso-and-milk drinks, but they are built around different proportions and textures. A latte usually contains more liquid milk and a thinner, more integrated layer of microfoam, so it is larger, smoother, and more milk-forward. A cappuccino usually uses less liquid milk relative to the espresso and more aeration, so it is smaller, foamier, and often tastes more coffee-forward.


The most important caffeine rule is simple: milk and foam do not determine the caffeine dose. If a latte and a cappuccino are made with the same espresso dose, their total caffeine can be similar even though the cappuccino tastes stronger. In real cafés, however, cup size and shot count vary, so either drink can contain more caffeine. Published analyses of commercial espresso show large serving-to-serving variation, which is why a drink name alone is a poor caffeine measurement. Crozier et al. found substantial variability across commercial espressos, and a larger survey likewise found caffeine ranging widely across espresso servings. Ludwig et al. reported 48–317 mg per serving in the coffees they analyzed.


So which should you order? Choose a latte when you want more milk, a smoother and more uniform mouthfeel, and a gentler coffee impression. Choose a cappuccino when you want a smaller drink with more aeration, a more obvious foam structure, and a more concentrated coffee-to-milk balance. Neither choice reveals your personality, and neither is universally “better.” Preference depends on the physical drink, the espresso recipe, milk, temperature, texture, learned expectations, and the situation in which you drink it.


Latte vs cappuccino at a glance


Espresso base: Both are espresso-based. A café may use one, two, or another configured number of espresso doses depending on size and house recipe.


Milk: A latte normally contains more liquid milk. A cappuccino normally contains less liquid milk relative to the espresso and more incorporated air.


Foam: A latte usually has a thin, glossy, integrated microfoam layer. A cappuccino typically has a deeper and more aerated foam structure, although modern specialty versions often use silky microfoam rather than stiff, dry foam.


Taste: A latte is usually milkier and less coffee-forward. A cappuccino often tastes more intense because there is less milk diluting the same or similar espresso base.


Mouthfeel: A latte tends toward smoothness, viscosity, and continuity. A cappuccino adds a stronger contrast between liquid coffee-milk and aerated foam.


Caffeine: Neither drink automatically contains more. Total caffeine follows the espresso dose and extraction, not the amount of milk or foam.


Calories and macronutrients: With the same milk type and no added sugar, a larger latte often contains more milk and therefore more milk-derived energy and nutrients. Actual values depend on serving size and recipe.


Preference: Latte preference often reflects liking for milk-forward flavor and smooth texture; cappuccino preference often reflects liking for a more coffee-forward balance and aeration. These are sensory preferences, not personality tests.


What is a latte?


A latte, short for caffè latte in common English-language café use, combines espresso with a relatively large amount of steamed milk and a thin layer of fine foam or microfoam. It belongs to the espresso-and-milk family rather than to a bean species, roast level, or brewing category. The English Hub latte guide covers the drink in depth, including caffeine, milk ratio, texture, and common variations.


There is no single worldwide latte ratio. Café practices differ by country, chain, specialty shop, cup size, espresso dose, and the degree of milk aeration. A practical home range is often around one part espresso to roughly three to five parts milk by approximate beverage mass or volume, but that is a working recipe rather than a legal or universal definition. A 2026 sensory study of café latte deliberately compared espresso-to-milk ratios of 1:2 and 1:3 and found that formulation differences contributed to distinct sensory profiles. Lee et al. studied café latte across different ratios, sugar levels, and evaluation contexts.


In practical terms, the defining direction is more useful than a rigid number: compared with a cappuccino made from a similar espresso base, the latte usually allocates more of the final cup to liquid milk and less to aerated foam. That shifts both physical concentration and perception.


What is a cappuccino?


A cappuccino also combines espresso and steamed milk, but it is conventionally smaller and more foam-forward than a latte. Its milk is aerated more, giving the drink a lower-density upper structure and a stronger texture contrast. The English Hub cappuccino guide explains cappuccino foam, caffeine, milk texture, wet and dry styles, and preparation in detail.


One documented professional specification is the Certified Italian Cappuccino from the Italian Espresso National Institute. That specification describes 100 mL of cold milk steamed to approximately 125 mL and about 55°C, then poured onto a certified Italian espresso in a 150–160 mL cup. The Institute’s official specification is useful as a defined Italian standard. It should not be mistaken for proof that every café worldwide must use exactly that recipe.


The familiar “one-third espresso, one-third steamed milk, one-third foam” formula is therefore best treated as a teaching shorthand for balance, not a universal physical law. Modern specialty cafés often pour a cohesive microfoam in which liquid milk and foam are not cleanly separated into three measurable layers.


The main difference: milk volume and aeration


Latte versus cappuccino is fundamentally a question of how much liquid milk surrounds the espresso and how much air is incorporated into that milk. Adding milk changes dilution, viscosity, aroma release, temperature, sweetness perception, and color. Adding air changes density, bubble structure, drainage, mouthfeel, and the way liquid and aroma are delivered during a sip.


Steam-frothed milk is a physical system, not simply hot milk with decorative bubbles. Milk proteins participate at the air–liquid interface, while fat content, protein content, processing history, temperature, steam pressure, and technique influence foamability and stability. Münchow et al. showed that fat and protein content change properties of steam-frothed milk. Klimanova et al. found that processing type and steam-heating temperature altered microfoam stability, viscosity, and bubble-size distribution.


Latte milk texture


For a latte, the goal is usually fine, glossy microfoam integrated through a comparatively large volume of liquid milk. The finished drink should feel smooth rather than visibly stratified into a large liquid layer and a dry foam cap. The foam is present, but it usually supports a continuous creamy texture rather than dominating the drink.


Cappuccino milk texture


For a cappuccino, more air is incorporated and the final beverage generally has a higher foam-to-liquid-milk proportion. Traditional and contemporary versions differ in exactly how airy the foam is, but the cappuccino should make aeration more evident than a latte. A well-textured modern cappuccino can still be glossy and fine-bubbled; “more foam” does not require coarse, dry bubbles.


This distinction explains why recipes that use the same espresso and the same milk can produce clearly different drinks without changing the ingredients. The difference is partly compositional and partly structural: the same material is organized into a different milk-to-air system.


Why a cappuccino often tastes stronger even when caffeine is the same


People often call cappuccino “stronger” than latte. That statement is useful only after defining stronger. In flavor terms, cappuccino often tastes more coffee-forward because a similar espresso dose is diluted by less liquid milk. In caffeine terms, the answer can be completely different.


Imagine two drinks made from the same double espresso. The latte receives much more steamed milk; the cappuccino receives less liquid milk and more air. Both began with the same caffeine-containing espresso, so the latte does not lose caffeine when milk is added. What changes is caffeine concentration per milliliter and, even more noticeably, the concentration of coffee flavor relative to milk.


This is why “strong coffee” should be split into at least four different meanings: flavor intensity, dissolved-coffee concentration, caffeine concentration per unit volume, and total caffeine per serving. A cappuccino can score higher on perceived coffee intensity while matching a latte in total caffeine. A large latte with an extra espresso dose can have more total caffeine while tasting gentler.


Which has more caffeine: latte or cappuccino?


Neither one inherently has more caffeine. The decisive variables are how much ground coffee is used, the coffee composition, extraction, beverage yield, and the number of espresso doses in the recipe. Milk changes the finished drink’s volume and concentration but contributes essentially no coffee-derived caffeine of its own.


Commercial espresso is variable enough that a fixed milligram number attached to the words “latte” or “cappuccino” is misleading. Crozier et al. reported substantial caffeine variation in commercial espresso, while Ludwig et al. measured 48–317 mg per serving across the coffees in their study. Those studies do not mean every latte spans that range; they show why the espresso component has to be treated as a variable rather than a universal dose.


For a real café order, the practical question is therefore: how many espresso doses are in this size, and what caffeine information does the café publish for that recipe? Two drinks with the same name can differ substantially across cafés.


Caffeine safety is about dose, not drink identity


For most adults, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration cites 400 mg of caffeine per day as an amount not generally associated with negative effects, while emphasizing that sensitivity varies among people and can be affected by medications, medical conditions, pregnancy, and other factors. That population-level figure is a safety reference rather than a target or an individualized recommendation.


If caffeine affects your sleep, anxiety, heart rate, or other symptoms, switching from latte to cappuccino is not a reliable solution unless the espresso dose changes. Decaf espresso or a lower-caffeine recipe changes the relevant variable more directly.


Taste: latte is usually milk-forward, cappuccino is usually coffee-forward


The taste difference comes from ratio and matrix. More milk lowers the concentration of coffee-derived compounds per sip and contributes its own sweetness, aroma, proteins, fat or plant components, and viscosity. Less milk leaves the espresso’s roast, acidity, bitterness, and aromatic profile relatively more exposed.


Controlled sensory chemistry supports the broader point that milk addition changes coffee perception. Itobe, Nishimura, and Kumazawa studied how milk influences aroma release and aroma perception during coffee consumption. More recently, Cleve et al. found that adding cow or oat milk changed flavor perception and reduced the perceived dominance of several coffee-related notes in tested coffees. These studies do not define latte or cappuccino recipes, but they demonstrate why changing the milk fraction changes the sensory experience rather than merely making a larger drink.


Bitterness and acidity


A cappuccino may make bitterness, roast character, or acidity more noticeable because the coffee fraction is less diluted. A latte may soften those impressions because more milk changes concentration, aroma, viscosity, and the balance of sensations. That does not mean milk chemically removes every bitter or acidic compound. The finished perception emerges from the whole mixture.


Sweetness


A plain latte or cappuccino does not require added sugar. Dairy milk naturally contains lactose, and many plant beverages contain their own carbohydrate profile or added sugars depending on formulation. Perceived sweetness also depends on temperature, aroma, texture, coffee bitterness, and expectation. It is therefore safer to say that milk can make espresso taste sweeter or gentler than to claim that steaming somehow creates large amounts of new sugar.


Aroma


Coffee flavor is not identical to taste on the tongue. Retronasal aroma contributes strongly while drinking, and the milk matrix can change how aroma compounds are released and perceived. A milkier latte can therefore feel less coffee-intense even when the espresso dose is unchanged.


Mouthfeel: the difference you can feel before you can name it


Latte and cappuccino are unusually good examples of why beverage perception cannot be reduced to ingredients. Texture is part of flavor experience. The latte’s larger liquid-milk fraction generally increases the sense of continuity, viscosity, smoothness, and coating. Cappuccino’s greater aeration adds lightness, bubble structure, and a stronger transition between foam and liquid.


Research on creaminess describes it as a multimodal perception involving tactile, taste, and aroma cues, with viscosity and lubrication among the important physical contributors. Upadhyay, Aktar, and Chen review the sensory mechanisms of creaminess. This helps explain why a latte can feel “creamier” even when its fat content is not higher: creaminess is a perceptual outcome shaped by several variables, including thickness, smoothness, mouth-coating, and flavor.


Temperature matters too


Latte and cappuccino recipes often leave the steam wand at similar milk temperatures, but the drinks can cool differently because of cup size, milk volume, foam volume, cup material, and serving time. Temperature changes volatility, oral sensation, sweetness perception, and how quickly a drink can be consumed.


For milk microfoam, controlled work suggests that temperature is also a structural variable. Klimanova et al. observed substantial changes in foam properties across steam-heating temperatures and identified a 50–60°C range as favorable for the microfoam systems they studied. That laboratory result should guide understanding of foam physics, not be treated as a universal café serving command.


Does cappuccino have more foam than latte?


Usually, yes. Cappuccino is defined in ordinary café practice by a more substantial aerated milk component, while latte uses a larger liquid-milk fraction and thinner microfoam. The difference is not best measured by a universal centimeter count because cup geometry, recipe, and foam structure vary.


Modern specialty coffee also complicates the old image of cappuccino as a cup with a dry spoonable foam mountain. High-quality cappuccino can use fine, moist microfoam that remains integrated enough for latte art while still being more aerated than the milk in a latte.


Does latte have more milk than cappuccino?


In typical café practice, yes. A latte normally devotes a larger proportion of the finished drink to liquid milk and is often served in a larger cup. A cappuccino is generally smaller and more aerated. This is why a latte usually tastes milder when the espresso dose is comparable.


The statement needs one caveat: menu names are not laboratory standards. A large chain cappuccino can contain more total milk than a tiny specialty latte simply because the serving sizes differ. Compare the actual recipe when exact nutrition or volume matters.


Calories, protein, fat, and sugar: which drink has more?


There is no universal nutrition winner because the answer depends on cup size, milk type, amount of milk, syrups, sugar, toppings, and espresso dose. If two drinks use the same milk and no additions, the one containing more milk will usually contain more milk-derived calories, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and micronutrients. In many cafés that will be the latte because it is larger and milkier.


Foam does not create calories out of air. It increases volume by dispersing air through milk. A cappuccino can therefore occupy a substantial cup volume while using less liquid milk than a latte. But a sweetened cappuccino can easily exceed an unsweetened latte if syrups, sugar, chocolate, cream, or larger serving sizes are added.


For anyone tracking nutrition closely, the café’s ingredient and nutrition information is more useful than the drink name. “Latte” and “cappuccino” describe recipe families, not fixed nutrient profiles.


Latte vs cappuccino with plant-based milk


Both drinks can be made with plant-based beverages, but changing the base liquid can change foaming behavior, flavor, viscosity, and stability. Products marketed for barista use are often formulated specifically to perform under steaming, but even within oat, soy, almond, and other categories, formulations vary.


A study comparing cow milk with several commercial plant-based beverages in cappuccino-style preparation found differences in composition, foaming behavior, and sensory acceptance, with performance depending on beverage type and temperature. Zakidou, Varka, and Paraskevopoulou provide the comparative data. The practical lesson is to judge the specific product and steaming behavior rather than assuming every plant beverage will produce the same microfoam.


How to make a latte and cappuccino from the same espresso


The cleanest home comparison is to hold the coffee constant and change the milk. Pull the same espresso recipe for both drinks, use the same milk, and then alter milk quantity and aeration. This makes the sensory difference easier to understand because you are not changing several variables at once.


For a latte


1. Pull your normal espresso into a larger cup. 2. Steam a comparatively larger quantity of milk. Introduce only enough air early in steaming to create fine microfoam, then keep the milk moving so the bubbles become small and the texture glossy. 3. Pour the milk so the foam remains integrated rather than forming a thick dry cap. 4. Stop adding milk when the drink reaches the balance you prefer; a practical home starting range is roughly one part espresso to three to five parts milk.


For a cappuccino


1. Pull the same espresso recipe into a smaller cup. 2. Use less milk overall. 3. Incorporate more air than you would for the latte, while still aiming for fine, glossy microfoam rather than large bubbles. 4. Pour so the finished drink has a more obvious aerated structure and a higher coffee-to-liquid-milk concentration.


The exact steaming movement depends on machine power, steam-tip design, pitcher shape, milk composition, and starting temperature. Laboratory studies confirm that steam pressure, nozzle design, composition, and temperature can all change foam properties, so stopwatch-style universal instructions are less reliable than observing texture and temperature.


How expectation changes the experience of latte and cappuccino


The physical differences between latte and cappuccino are real, but the final experience is also perceptual. Before the first sip, the drink’s name, cup, size, color contrast, visible foam, latte art, price, and café context create expectations about sweetness, strength, quality, and texture. Those expectations can influence subsequent judgments.


This does not mean expectation invents the beverage. The espresso dose, milk quantity, temperature, and foam structure still constrain what is physically present. Psychology operates on the perception and interpretation of that physical signal.


Coffee-specific experiments demonstrate this interaction. Van Doorn, Wuillemin, and Spence found that mug color influenced ratings of a café latte. Carvalho and Spence later found that cup color affected expected and experienced sensory judgments and liking in specialty coffee. These studies concern serving context rather than latte-versus-cappuccino identity itself, but they show why identical liquid can be experienced differently under different cues.


Preference: why some people prefer latte and others cappuccino


Preference is an affective judgment, not an objective property of the drink. One person may value a high coffee-to-milk contrast; another may prefer a smoother, milk-dominant profile. Someone may like dense mouth-coating texture, while someone else enjoys a lighter aerated foam. Prior exposure, culture, habit, sensory sensitivity, time of day, food pairing, temperature, and the quality of the particular café’s recipe can all matter.


Professional sensory science explicitly separates description from liking. The Specialty Coffee Association Coffee Value Assessment distinguishes descriptive assessment of sensory attributes from affective assessment of preference and quality impression, while also treating extrinsic information as a separate dimension. That distinction is especially useful here: “more foam” and “more liquid milk” describe the beverage, while “better,” “too milky,” or “perfectly balanced” are judgments.


There is no reliable evidence base for diagnosing personality from a latte or cappuccino order. Coffee preference can be psychologically meaningful as part of habit, identity, memory, and social routine without becoming a personality test.


Which one should you order?


Order a latte if you want a larger, milkier drink with smooth microfoam and less coffee intensity per sip.


Order a cappuccino if you want a smaller, foamier drink with more obvious coffee flavor relative to milk.


Choose based on caffeine only after checking espresso dose. If both contain the same espresso, the caffeine can be similar.


Choose based on calories or nutrition only after checking serving size, milk, sweeteners, and toppings. The drink name is not enough.


If you dislike large amounts of foam but want a coffee-forward milk drink, a flat white may be closer to what you want; its exact comparison belongs to the dedicated flat-white branch article once that page is live.


If you want an espresso drink diluted with water rather than milk, the Americano guide explains why dilution can change perceived strength without automatically changing the caffeine already present in the espresso.


Latte vs cappuccino vs flat white


All three are commonly espresso-based drinks, but they organize milk differently. Latte generally means more milk and a larger, smoother drink. Cappuccino generally means less liquid milk and more aeration. Flat white generally means a smaller milk drink with thin integrated microfoam and a comparatively coffee-forward balance.


The borders are not perfectly standardized across countries and cafés, so exact ounce counts create false precision. The most useful comparison is structural: latte emphasizes milk volume, cappuccino emphasizes aeration and foam, and flat white emphasizes a compact espresso-to-milk balance with thin microfoam.


Cappuccino vs Latte vs Flat White: What Is the Difference? — the broader three-way comparison when Flat White is part of the decision.


Common myths and misunderstandings


“Cappuccino has more caffeine because it tastes stronger.”


Not necessarily. The stronger taste usually reflects a higher coffee-to-liquid-milk concentration. Total caffeine depends on the espresso dose and extraction.


“Latte is weak coffee.”


A latte is often less coffee-intense per sip, but it can contain the same or more total caffeine than a cappuccino if the espresso dose is the same or larger. “Weak” confuses flavor intensity with stimulant dose.


“A real cappuccino must be three perfectly separate thirds.”


The thirds formula is a useful teaching model, but professional standards and café practices vary. Modern microfoam can be integrated, and the drink does not need to resemble three rigid geological layers.


“A latte always has more calories.”


A typical larger latte often contains more milk and therefore can contain more calories than a smaller cappuccino made with the same milk. But sweeteners, toppings, milk type, and serving size can reverse the comparison.


“Foam is only decoration.”


Foam changes physical density, bubble structure, oral texture, drainage, and the way the drink reaches the mouth. It is part of the sensory design of a cappuccino.


“Your coffee order reveals your personality.”


A preference may reflect learned taste, sensory comfort, habit, social context, or routine. That is very different from inferring stable personality traits from a menu choice.


Frequently asked questions


What is the biggest difference between a latte and a cappuccino?


Milk proportion and aeration. A latte usually uses more liquid milk and thinner microfoam; a cappuccino generally uses less liquid milk and more aerated foam.


Which has more milk?


Usually the latte. Because café serving sizes vary, compare the actual recipe if you need an exact amount.


Which has more foam?


Usually the cappuccino. Contemporary cappuccino foam can still be fine, glossy microfoam rather than dry, coarse froth.


Which tastes stronger?


Usually the cappuccino when both use comparable espresso, because there is less liquid milk diluting coffee flavor. That does not automatically mean more caffeine.


Which has more caffeine?


Neither by definition. The espresso dose and extraction determine the answer. Same espresso input usually means similar total caffeine; different shot counts can change it substantially.


Is a latte sweeter than a cappuccino?


It can taste sweeter or gentler because it contains more milk relative to coffee, but actual sweetness depends on the milk, recipe, temperature, coffee, and any added sugar or syrup.


Which is creamier?


Latte is commonly perceived as smoother and milkier because of its larger liquid-milk fraction. Cappuccino can also be creamy, but its more aerated structure produces a lighter and more foam-forward mouthfeel.


Which is healthier?


There is no universal answer. Milk type, serving size, added sugar, dietary needs, and caffeine dose matter more than the name. A smaller unsweetened cappuccino may contain less milk than a large latte, but recipes vary.


Can both be made decaf?


Yes. Use decaf espresso as the coffee base. Decaffeinated coffee still can contain small amounts of caffeine, so “decaf” is not identical to zero caffeine.


Can both be made with oat or soy milk?


Yes. Plant-based beverages can be steamed for both styles, although foam behavior and flavor vary by product formulation. A barista-style product may behave differently from a standard beverage from the same plant source.


Is an iced latte the same thing as an iced cappuccino?


Not really. Iced latte has a clear conventional structure: espresso, cold milk, and ice. “Iced cappuccino” is less standardized and can refer to different café recipes involving cold foam, blended foam, or chilled milk. Check the specific menu description.


Which is better for someone new to espresso?


A latte is often an easier introduction when someone prefers milk-forward flavor and lower perceived coffee intensity. A cappuccino is useful when someone wants to taste more of the espresso while keeping milk and foam in the drink. This is a preference choice, not a quality hierarchy.


Does latte art mean the drink is a latte?


No. Fine microfoam can support latte art in lattes, cappuccinos, and flat whites. The pattern on top does not define the underlying beverage ratio.


Why do two cafés make completely different cappuccinos?


Because bean blend, roast, espresso dose, beverage yield, shot count, milk product, steaming temperature, aeration, cup size, and house convention can all differ. The menu name defines a family of drinks, not a single globally fixed formula.


The bottom line


Latte and cappuccino begin with the same basic architecture—espresso plus textured milk—but they organize milk and air differently. Latte typically uses more liquid milk and thinner microfoam, producing a larger, smoother, more milk-forward drink. Cappuccino typically uses less liquid milk and more aeration, producing a smaller, foamier, more coffee-forward drink.


The distinction becomes clearer when “strength” is separated into its components. Cappuccino often has stronger perceived coffee flavor. Caffeine can be similar when the espresso dose is similar. A latte often contains more milk and therefore may contain more milk-derived calories in comparable unsweetened recipes. Texture, temperature, aroma, cup cues, expectation, and prior experience then shape how those physical differences are perceived.


For the broader map of beans, roasting, brewing, drinks, caffeine, taste, and perception, see Coffee: Beans, Drinks, Caffeine, Brewing, Taste, and Psychology.


Related Articles


Latte: What It Is, Caffeine, Milk Ratio, and Why Texture Changes the Experience — the dedicated latte definition, ratio, caffeine, and texture guide.


Cappuccino: What It Is, Caffeine, Foam, and Why Texture Matters — the dedicated cappuccino definition, foam science, caffeine, and preparation guide.


Americano Coffee: What It Is, Caffeine, Taste, and Why Dilution Changes Perceived Strength — the Coffee Drinks branch pillar and a useful comparison for dilution versus milk.


Coffee: Beans, Drinks, Caffeine, Brewing, Taste, and Psychology — the global Coffee Psychology & Coffee Knowledge hub.


Flat White: What It Is, Caffeine, Milk Texture, and How It Differs From a Latte — the live adjacent Flat White definition owner and Coffee Drinks neighbor.


References


Carvalho, F. M., & Spence, C. (2019). Cup colour influences consumers’ expectations and experience on tasting specialty coffee. Food Quality and Preference, 75, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.03.001


Cleve, N., Gonzalez-Estanol, K., Khomenko, I., Pedrotti, M., Cappellin, L., Biasioli, F., & Beauchamp, J. (2025). Effects of Roasting Level and Milk Addition on In Vivo Aroma Release and Perception of Coffee. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 73(22), 13792–13808. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.4c12852


Crozier, T. W. M., Stalmach, A., Lean, M. E. J., & Crozier, A. (2012). Espresso coffees, caffeine and chlorogenic acid intake: potential health implications. Food & Function, 3(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1FO10240K


Istituto Espresso Italiano. Certified Italian Espresso and Certified Italian Cappuccino. https://www.inei.coffee/files/File/istituzionale_inei_hq_en.pdf


Itobe, T., Nishimura, O., & Kumazawa, K. (2015). Influence of Milk on Aroma Release and Aroma Perception during Consumption of Coffee Beverages. Food Science and Technology Research, 21(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.21.607


Klimanova, Y., Polzonetti, V., Pucciarelli, S., Perinelli, D. R., Bonacucina, G., Cespi, M., Gabrielli, M. G., Santini, G., Fioretti, L., Cognigni, L., & Vincenzetti, S. (2022). Effect of steam frothing on milk microfoam: Chemical composition, texture, stability and organoleptic properties. International Dairy Journal, 135, 105476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105476


Lee, D., Kim, S., Woo, S., & Lee, Y. (2026). Effects of Cognitive Style and Evaluation Context on Hedonic and Sensory Perception of Café Latte: A Comparison of Sensory Booth, Real-Life, and Mixed Reality Environments. Foods, 15(9), 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods15091487


Ludwig, I. A., Mena, P., Calani, L., Cid, C., Del Rio, D., Lean, M. E. J., & Crozier, A. (2014). Variations in caffeine and chlorogenic acid contents of coffees: what are we drinking? Food & Function, 5(8), 1718–1726. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4FO00290C


Münchow, M., Jørgensen, L., Amigo, J. M., Sørensen, K. M., & Ipsen, R. (2015). Steam-frothing of milk for coffee: Evaluation for foam properties using video analysis and feature extraction. International Dairy Journal, 51, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2015.07.009


Specialty Coffee Association. Coffee Value Assessment. https://sca.coffee/value-assessment/


U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2024). Spilling the Beans: How Much Caffeine is Too Much? https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/spilling-beans-how-much-caffeine-too-much


Upadhyay, R., Aktar, T., & Chen, J. (2020). Perception of creaminess in foods. Journal of Texture Studies, 51(3), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12509


Van Doorn, G. H., Wuillemin, D., & Spence, C. (2014). Does the colour of the mug influence the taste of the coffee? Flavour, 3, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2044-7248-3-10


Zakidou, P., Varka, E.-M., & Paraskevopoulou, A. (2022). Foaming properties and sensory acceptance of plant-based beverages as alternatives in the preparation of cappuccino style beverages. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 30, 100623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100623

 
 
bottom of page