Hyperarousal and Insomnia: Why the Brain Stays Alert at Night

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Sleep, Insomnia & Circadian Psychology · Written by Artificial Sapiens

A person can feel deeply exhausted at bedtime and still become more alert the moment they try to sleep. Thoughts sharpen, the body seems watchful, ordinary sounds attract attention, and the prospect of another difficult night becomes a problem to solve. Insomnia researchers use the hyperarousal model to study this pattern. It proposes that heightened cognitive-emotional activity, features of cortical activation, and certain physiological processes can interfere with falling asleep, staying asleep, and experiencing sleep as restorative. The model also helps explain why sleep trouble can persist after the original source of stress has faded.

Hyperarousal is an explanatory research construct, not a separate sleep-disorder diagnosis, a synonym for anxiety, or proof that a person's nervous system is permanently overactivated. Its components have different levels of empirical support. A 2023 review by Dressle and Riemann found substantial evidence for sleep-related cognitive-emotional activation and cortical activity, but inconclusive findings for autonomic indicators such as heart rate and heart-rate variability. Clinical decisions therefore depend on the full sleep history and differential diagnosis rather than a single hyperarousal score or wearable measurement.

Quick answer: why does the brain stay alert when you want to sleep?

Sleep normally emerges from the interaction of sleep pressure, circadian timing, environmental opportunity, and neural systems regulating wakefulness. If a person begins monitoring whether sleep is happening, rehearsing tomorrow's consequences, or responding to the bed as a cue for vigilance, sleep initiation can become more effortful. The person may remain tired because the need for sleep is still present, while attention and emotional activation continue to favor wakefulness. In research models, that coexistence of fatigue and alertness is part of the phenomenon being explained.

The central clinical implication is that repeatedly trying harder to sleep may reinforce the monitoring and frustration that keep the problem active. Treatment focuses on changing sleep-related learning, patterns of behavior, and unhelpful interpretations, while checking for other disorders or exposures that need their own care. Multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the best-supported first-line behavioral intervention for adult chronic insomnia, according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine guideline and the 2025 VA/DoD guideline.

What hyperarousal means in insomnia research

Arousal is a normal feature of the nervous system: people shift among vigilance, engagement, rest, and sleep throughout each day. The hyperarousal hypothesis addresses a relative elevation of activation in the context of insomnia. It is a multidimensional account rather than a single biological switch. The classic Riemann and colleagues review brought together behavioral, neuroendocrine, autonomic, electroencephalographic, and brain-imaging findings. Subsequent work has refined the model and highlighted substantial heterogeneity across individuals and methods.

Cognitive-emotional hyperarousal

This domain includes persistent worry, rumination, anticipating consequences, checking the clock, interpreting normal wakefulness as threatening, and directing attention toward signs of whether sleep is arriving. Cognitive activation does not have to sound like explicit fear. Planning, mental problem-solving, reviewing conversations, and attempting to suppress thoughts can all make bedtime mentally engaging. Harvey's cognitive model of insomnia describes how negatively toned thoughts, selective attention to sleep-related threats, and counterproductive coping strategies may maintain perceived and actual sleep difficulties.

The key distinction is between having thoughts at night and developing a self-sustaining pattern in which thoughts about sleep become emotionally charged, repeatedly monitored, and tied to a prolonged inability to sleep. Everyone thinks at bedtime sometimes. Researchers focus on the intensity, timing, interpretation, and persistence of cognitive activity in people with insomnia symptoms.

Cortical hyperarousal

Cortical arousal refers to measurable characteristics of brain activity, frequently studied with electroencephalography (EEG). Some insomnia studies report relatively elevated higher-frequency EEG activity around sleep onset or during sleep and altered sleep microstructure. The neurocognitive model developed by Perlis and colleagues proposed that continuing information processing during sleep can contribute to confusion between sleep and wakefulness. A 2023 synthesis identifies cortical activity and brief arousal events during sleep as important lines of evidence, while emphasizing that findings are not a universal diagnostic signature.

A person cannot tell from the sensation of a busy brain whether their EEG would show any particular pattern. Neither intrusive thinking nor feeling awake establishes a specific cortical abnormality. Likewise, clinical insomnia usually does not require an EEG-based proof of hyperarousal.

Physiological and neuroendocrine arousal

Physical sensations such as muscle tension, warmth, palpitations, gastrointestinal discomfort, or restlessness can accompany sleeplessness. Studies have investigated autonomic activity, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress system, and metabolic measures. The research is mixed: reports of group-average physiological differences do not establish a reliable, individual-level biomarker. In particular, Dressle and Riemann found no conclusive evidence that heart rate or heart-rate variability consistently define physiological hyperarousal across insomnia populations. Neuroendocrine findings are intriguing but require careful interpretation.

A racing heartbeat can have medical, medication-related, emotional, or substance-related explanations. It should never be assumed to be harmless insomnia hyperarousal merely because it occurs at night. Persistent or concerning cardiovascular symptoms require appropriate medical assessment.

How hyperarousal develops: the interaction of vulnerability, stress, and learning

A useful framework distinguishes predisposition, precipitation, and perpetuation. In the influential behavioral model described by Spielman, Caruso, and Glovinsky, some people have traits or circumstances that increase vulnerability to sleep disturbance. An acute stressor may then trigger a run of difficult nights. Later, attempts to compensate for sleep loss and conditioned associations with the sleep environment may help keep insomnia going, even when the original stressor is no longer active. This is a conceptual framework for understanding patterns, not a formula that predicts any individual's course.

Sleep reactivity: how strongly stress disrupts sleep

Sleep reactivity is the tendency for a person's sleep to change when they experience stress. Prospective studies have found that higher self-reported reactivity predicts greater likelihood of later insomnia, though prediction is probabilistic. In a community study involving more than 2,000 participants, Drake and colleagues found that stressful events and intrusive responses to stress predicted subsequent insomnia. A later prospective risk-assessment study also linked baseline sleep reactivity to incident insomnia. These observational findings support vulnerability models; they do not establish that elevated reactivity guarantees a disorder.

A 2023 review of sleep responses to stress concluded that premorbid sleep reactivity has substantial prospective support and that early behavioral interventions may help reduce ongoing vulnerability. Sleep reactivity is a research and screening construct. A questionnaire result alone cannot diagnose insomnia, quantify brain activity, or determine the best treatment.

Conditioning: when the bed becomes associated with being awake

After repeated difficult nights, ordinary bedtime signals can acquire an alerting meaning. A bedroom that once signaled rest may now prompt frustration, checking, or prediction of another unsuccessful night. Spending longer in bed to make up for poor sleep can increase the amount of time spent awake in that environment. This possibility underlies stimulus control, a standard component of CBT-I: treatment aims to rebuild a reliable association between bed and sleep while supporting appropriate sleep timing and continuity. AASM recommendations support stimulus control as a treatment component and, conditionally, as a standalone intervention in selected adults.

Monitoring and sleep effort

Someone experiencing insomnia may watch the clock, measure how long sleep is taking, mentally calculate remaining hours, or evaluate every sensation as evidence of progress or failure. These behaviors are understandable responses to a distressing problem. Yet constant monitoring can increase salience and emotional arousal. Sleep is a biological process that generally becomes easier when a person can allow it to unfold rather than demanding an immediate performance. This relationship between excessive effort, threat monitoring, and sleep-related worry is a prominent clinical hypothesis in cognitive accounts of insomnia.

Why 'tired but wired' is a useful description, with important limits

Feeling exhausted while remaining unable to sleep can reflect the coexistence of sleep need and wake-promoting activity. Fatigue, however, is not identical to sleepiness. Fatigue often refers to low energy or the sense that effort is difficult; sleepiness refers more directly to a tendency to fall asleep. People with insomnia frequently describe fatigue without irresistibly dozing, while some people with insufficient sleep or other sleep disorders experience profound sleepiness. This distinction matters when assessing clinical risk.

The phrase 'tired but wired' captures one lived experience rather than a medical test. Similar sensations can occur during acute stress, circadian misalignment, stimulant use, pain, medication effects, or certain psychiatric and medical states. The person who feels activated at night may have chronic insomnia, brief sleep disruption, a different sleep disorder, or overlapping conditions. Hyperarousal language is useful only when it improves the explanation and does not replace differential assessment.

Is hyperarousal the cause of insomnia, a consequence, or both?

The relationship is likely reciprocal and varies among people. Elevated sleep-related cognitive activation may precede a difficult night; a difficult night may then increase concern, vigilance, and compensatory behavior before the next bedtime. Insomnia can also coexist with biological and psychological features that are measured during the day. But much of the physiological literature compares groups or measures activation and sleep at the same time. Such findings cannot on their own establish which process started first or how treatment should be individualized.

The 2023 hyperarousal review separates physiological, cortical, and cognitive-emotional evidence rather than treating all measurements as interchangeable. More recent work reviewing insomnia phenotypes has likewise highlighted the need for replicable, clinically useful objective measures before physiological hyperarousal can be employed as a routine diagnostic category. The practical conclusion is to use hyperarousal as a guiding model while addressing the observable sleep complaint, functioning, and maintaining mechanisms.

Hyperarousal and the diagnosis of insomnia disorder

A hyperarousal experience does not establish an insomnia disorder. Clinical assessment asks whether a person has persistent difficulty initiating sleep, maintaining sleep, or returning to sleep after an early awakening despite sufficient opportunity and appropriate circumstances for sleep; how often it occurs; how long it has lasted; and what daytime consequences accompany it. Under widely used criteria, chronic insomnia disorder generally involves symptoms at least three nights a week for at least three months, with associated daytime impairment or distress. A clinician also considers circumstances and other explanations. See the NHLBI diagnosis guidance and the AASM ICSD-3-TR classification.

A difficult week after a major life event may be a short-term sleep complaint. Going to bed much earlier than one's actual biological sleep window may create prolonged wakefulness without establishing hyperarousal as the cause. Repeated daytime impairment with persistent difficulty sleeping warrants evaluation even if someone has no dramatic sensations of racing thoughts or bodily alertness.

What a clinician may assess

The clinical interview generally covers sleep opportunity; work, caregiving, and school schedules; bedtime and wake time; time awake overnight; naps; daytime fatigue and sleepiness; pain and mood symptoms; caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, other substances, and medications; breathing symptoms; and safety risks. A sleep diary maintained for roughly one to two weeks helps reveal patterns without relying on one memorable night. The NHLBI describes sleep diaries, history, physical examination, and targeted testing. Questionnaires can measure symptom severity or presleep arousal, but no questionnaire is a standalone diagnostic authority.

Routine laboratory polysomnography is not required simply to demonstrate cortical hyperarousal in someone with typical chronic insomnia. A sleep study may be appropriate when the history suggests sleep apnea, unusual movements or behaviors, another specific sleep disorder, or a difficult diagnostic situation. Commercial sleep trackers can provide rough behavior trends, but their sleep-stage estimates, resting heart rate, and recovery scores cannot confirm or exclude insomnia-related hyperarousal.

Important alternatives and overlapping conditions

Insomnia versus anxiety disorders

Anxiety and insomnia may reinforce each other, but they have distinct clinical questions. Persistent worries across life domains, panic attacks, trauma-related alarm, and obsessive symptoms call for assessment in their own right. Sleep-focused attention and conditioned nighttime vigilance can also appear without a separate anxiety diagnosis. The Hub's existing Anxiety and Sleep: Insomnia, Hyperarousal, and the Anxiety-Sleep Cycle examines the bidirectional interaction; the present article focuses specifically on mechanisms and evidence within insomnia research.

Circadian timing and insufficient sleep opportunity

A late chronotype or delayed sleep-wake phase can make a conventional bedtime feel physiologically too early. Shift work, irregular schedules, jet lag, and chronically inadequate time in bed can also disrupt sleep. When sleep timing is the dominant problem, additional attention to sleep-related fear alone may miss the underlying circadian or opportunity mismatch. Assessment should compare sleep on workdays and free days rather than inferring insomnia from a preferred late bedtime.

Sleep apnea, movement disorders, pain, and medical contributors

Loud snoring, witnessed pauses in breathing, gasping awakenings, and marked daytime sleepiness raise concern for sleep-disordered breathing. Uncomfortable urges to move the legs, especially at rest in the evening, may suggest restless legs syndrome. Pain, reflux, nocturia, menopause-associated symptoms, thyroid disorders, and medications can contribute to nighttime awakenings or arousal. These issues may coexist with insomnia, and treating one does not automatically resolve the others. The 2025 VA/DoD guideline explicitly addresses insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea as distinct but often interacting care pathways.

Mood elevation and other urgent clinical states

Markedly reduced need for sleep accompanied by elevated or unusually irritable mood, substantially increased energy, impulsivity, rapid speech, or unusual behavior requires prompt clinical assessment for possible mania or another acute condition. It differs from wanting to sleep but being unable to do so. Severe confusion, psychotic symptoms, or thoughts of self-harm likewise warrant urgent professional support. Insomnia-treatment exercises that intentionally reduce time in bed can have particular risks in people vulnerable to mania, seizure disorders, or hazardous occupational sleepiness.

Treating insomnia when hyperarousal is part of the pattern

Multicomponent CBT-I: the strongest clinical evidence

CBT-I addresses insomnia through coordinated behavioral and cognitive methods. It typically includes assessment with sleep diaries, education about sleep regulation, strategies that restore bed-sleep associations, carefully supervised adjustments to sleep scheduling, and work on worry or unhelpful expectations. The treatment does not depend on proving a unique hyperarousal biomarker. In its 2021 guideline, AASM strongly recommends multicomponent CBT-I for adults with chronic insomnia. Its accompanying systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated randomized studies across multiple outcomes. The 2025 VA/DoD guideline also presents evidence-based chronic-insomnia management.

CBT-I targets several possible maintaining mechanisms at once, which is useful because the same pattern of sleeplessness can involve sleep effort, conditioned arousal, irregular timing, time-in-bed patterns, and sleep-related beliefs in different proportions. A clinician can tailor components and account for comorbid conditions. The English Hub guide to CBT-I explains the treatment in detail.

Stimulus control and relearning the sleep environment

Stimulus control works on the learned relationship between the bed, wakeful activities, and sleep. It generally involves a consistent approach to using the bed for sleep and avoiding long periods of frustrated wakefulness in bed. Details should be individualized, especially for people with mobility limitations, fall risk, caregiving demands, or other medical conditions. It is best understood as a structured therapeutic method rather than a punitive rule about exactly how many minutes someone is allowed to remain awake.

Cognitive therapy and reducing sleep-related threat monitoring

Cognitive approaches help examine interpretations such as 'If I do not fall asleep immediately, tomorrow will be ruined' or 'Every awakening proves that my sleep system is failing.' The aim is not to promise that poor sleep has no consequences; it is to develop more proportionate predictions and reduce escalating self-monitoring. A therapist may explore the person's response to wakefulness, concerns about functioning, clock checking, compensatory habits, and the meaning assigned to a bad night. These processes are central to the cognitive model proposed by Harvey.

Relaxation and downregulation strategies

Some people benefit from gradual muscle relaxation, paced breathing that feels comfortable, guided imagery, or mindfulness-based practices as supportive approaches. These can reduce the unpleasantness of presleep tension and help a person respond more flexibly to wakefulness. In its guideline, AASM conditionally supports relaxation therapy as an insomnia treatment component or selected single-component approach. A crucial practical distinction is whether relaxation becomes an opportunity for rest or another nightly test of whether one has finally succeeded at falling asleep.

Sleep scheduling and why unsupervised sleep restriction can be risky

Behavioral sleep scheduling within CBT-I may temporarily change time in bed to consolidate sleep, but these changes require clinical judgment. Daytime sleepiness, driving or machinery operation, seizures, bipolar-spectrum conditions, and medical vulnerability may change the risk-benefit assessment. The AASM guideline describes adverse effects and important precautions. Someone experiencing prolonged insomnia should not independently impose aggressive sleep restriction, drive while drowsy, or alter medications in an attempt to lower 'hyperarousal.'

Sleep hygiene, medications, and digital tools

Regularity, reasonable light exposure, a supportive sleep environment, and awareness of stimulant timing can improve sleep opportunity. Yet education about these habits alone is less effective for adult chronic insomnia than structured evidence-based treatment. AASM suggests against sleep hygiene as a standalone treatment. Medication decisions require an individualized review of symptoms, medical conditions, interactions, dependence and adverse effects; the hyperarousal model alone does not determine a drug choice. Structured digital CBT-I may improve access, but applications differ widely in evidence, clinical supervision, and suitability. A generic calming app or AI companion should not be presented as clinically equivalent to validated CBT-I.

What can help tonight while longer-term care is arranged?

When the immediate problem is feeling intensely alert at bedtime, a useful starting point is to reduce the sense that the night has become a high-stakes performance. Notice whether clock checking, repeatedly estimating tomorrow's energy, or searching for the perfect technique is adding urgency. If thoughts appear, acknowledging them and returning to a quiet, undemanding activity may be more workable than trying to force them away. A relaxing pre-bed routine, a comfortable environment, and a stable waking schedule can support sleep opportunity, while persistent insomnia deserves access to CBT-I rather than endless self-experimentation.

A brief sleep diary may help identify patterns for a clinician, but monitoring should remain proportionate. If a tracker score creates worry, reducing attention to that score can be reasonable. Avoid attempting to interpret consumer heart-rate variability, brief nighttime awakenings, or a single night of poor estimated deep sleep as a diagnosis. Where symptoms involve breathing difficulty, dangerous sleepiness, chest symptoms, or a dramatic change in mood or behavior, clinical assessment takes priority over behavioral sleep tips.

What research can and cannot establish about hyperarousal

Three distinctions keep the scientific picture accurate. First, an average group difference does not identify a cause for every person with insomnia. Second, the domains of arousal are not interchangeable: substantial evidence for presleep worry does not mean that heart rate, cortisol, EEG activity, and subjective vigilance all rise consistently in each individual. Third, improving insomnia with CBT-I demonstrates treatment benefit; it does not prove that a particular neural or hormonal marker changed in the way one theory predicted.

The strongest evidence is clinical for CBT-I and substantial but more heterogeneous for mechanisms. Cognitive-emotional arousal and cortical activation have credible experimental and observational support; autonomic measures remain inconsistent; some neuroendocrine hypotheses are still being refined. Research on objective sleep duration phenotypes, microarousals, and susceptibility to stress may sharpen explanatory models, but none currently makes home measurement of hyperarousal an established clinical diagnostic pathway. The approach of the 2023 review is especially useful because it identifies which parts of the model are better supported and which require better replication.

When to seek professional help

Consider a primary care clinician, behavioral sleep medicine specialist, or qualified mental health professional familiar with CBT-I when sleep difficulty persists, causes substantial distress, disrupts concentration, affects daily functioning, or leads to repeated attempts to compensate with alcohol, sedatives, or unsafe sleep loss. Bring a brief account of sleep timing, symptoms, relevant health conditions, substances or medications, and what has already been tried. The Hub's guide to when to see a doctor for insomnia addresses care navigation.

Seek urgent assistance for chest pain, severe breathing difficulty, episodes of falling asleep while driving, an acute state of markedly reduced need for sleep with major mood or behavioral changes, severe confusion, or immediate safety concerns. A clinician should assess possible sleep apnea or another sleep disorder when snoring, gasping, witnessed breathing pauses, unusual nocturnal behaviors, or pronounced daytime sleepiness are present. These signs call for evaluation of the actual condition, not a presumption that hyperarousal explains everything.

Frequently asked questions

Can you be sleepy and hyperaroused at the same time?

Yes. A strong need for sleep can coexist with heightened attention, emotional activation, or wake-promoting physiological processes. The subjective experience of being exhausted but mentally alert is common in discussions of insomnia. It does not independently confirm a particular EEG pattern, autonomic state, or diagnosis.

Does hyperarousal mean my nervous system is damaged?

No such conclusion follows from the model. Hyperarousal refers to relative activation and possible maintaining processes; it is not a finding of permanent injury. Persistent insomnia is treatable, and evaluation should focus on the actual sleep complaint, daytime consequences, and any conditions that require separate care.

Is hyperarousal the same as generalized anxiety?

No. Cognitive worry and vigilance overlap, but insomnia-related monitoring may be tightly focused on sleep itself. An anxiety disorder involves its own symptom pattern and diagnostic criteria. Both conditions can coexist, and either may need independent treatment.

Can high heart rate or low HRV prove insomnia hyperarousal?

No. Such readings can change with physical health, temperature, activity, substances, medications, device characteristics, and many other factors. Research has not established an autonomic signature that can reliably diagnose insomnia hyperarousal in an individual. Dressle and Riemann's 2023 review specifically describes the autonomic evidence as inconclusive.

Why do I suddenly feel awake when I enter the bedroom?

After repeated nights of wakefulness, the bedroom may become associated with prediction, effort, or frustration. This conditioned-arousal hypothesis helps explain why alertness can emerge in an otherwise sleepy person. It remains important to consider actual bedtime timing, environmental triggers, medical symptoms, and other sleep disorders.

Is hyperarousal present all day in everyone with chronic insomnia?

No. Some studies detect elevated arousal-related measures during day and night at the group level, but different individuals show different combinations of symptoms and physiological findings. The research model does not require constant consciously felt alertness in every patient.

Will breathing exercises alone cure chronic insomnia?

Relaxation may help with tension and may serve as a component of treatment. It is not guaranteed to resolve learned sleep associations, persistent sleep worries, schedule patterns, or coexisting disorders. Multicomponent CBT-I has the strongest guideline support for adult chronic insomnia.

Does a normal sleep study rule out insomnia?

No. An insomnia disorder is commonly assessed through clinical history, sleep opportunity, the reported sleep disturbance, and daytime impact. A sleep study is used selectively, especially where other disorders are suspected. Subjective experience and objective sleep measurements may differ without making the person's distress unreal.

What is the first practical step if insomnia keeps returning?

Document the pattern briefly and seek an evidence-based insomnia assessment, particularly if the difficulty occurs regularly and affects daytime functioning. Ask about CBT-I and whether sleep apnea, circadian mismatch, medication effects, pain, or another condition may contribute. Avoid self-prescribed aggressive sleep restriction or medication changes.

Related Articles

Insomnia: Symptoms, Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment · Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I): How It Works · Insomnia Assessment: Sleep Diaries, Clinical Questions, and Tests · Anxiety and Sleep: Insomnia, Hyperarousal, and the Anxiety-Sleep Cycle · When to See a Doctor for Insomnia and Sleep Problems

Racing Thoughts at Bedtime: Rumination, Worry, and Sleep

Sleep Anxiety: Fear of Not Sleeping and the Insomnia Cycle

References

American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition, Text Revision (ICSD-3-TR): official classification overview.

Drake, C. L., et al. (2014). Stress and sleep reactivity: A prospective investigation of the stress-diathesis model of insomnia. Sleep. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.3916.

Dressle, R. J., & Riemann, D. (2023). Hyperarousal in insomnia disorder: Current evidence and potential mechanisms. Journal of Sleep Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13928.

Edinger, J. D., et al. (2021a). Behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 17, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8986.

Edinger, J. D., et al. (2021b). Behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 17, 263–298. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8988.

Harvey, A. G. (2002). A cognitive model of insomnia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 869–893. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12186352/.

Kalmbach, D. A., Pillai, V., Arnedt, J. T., & Drake, C. L. (2016). Identifying at-risk individuals for insomnia using the Ford Insomnia Response to Stress Test. Sleep, 39, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.5462.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2022). Insomnia: Diagnosis. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/insomnia/diagnosis.

Perlis, M. L., Giles, D. E., Mendelson, W. B., Bootzin, R. R., & Wyatt, J. K. (1997). Psychophysiological insomnia: The behavioural model and a neurocognitive perspective. Journal of Sleep Research, 6, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2869.1997.00045.x.

Reffi, A. N., Kalmbach, D. A., Cheng, P., & Drake, C. L. (2023). The sleep response to stress: How sleep reactivity can help us prevent insomnia and promote resilience to trauma. Journal of Sleep Research, 32, e13892. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13892.

Riemann, D., et al. (2010). The hyperarousal model of insomnia: A review of the concept and its evidence. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 14, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2009.04.002.

Spielman, A. J., Caruso, L. S., & Glovinsky, P. B. (1987). A behavioral perspective on insomnia treatment. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 10, 541–553. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3332317/.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs & U.S. Department of Defense. (2025). Management of Chronic Insomnia Disorder and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Clinical Practice Guideline. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/CD/insomnia/.