How to Set Goals You Can Actually Follow Through On
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy
A goal becomes easier to follow through on when it explains what you want to change, why the change matters, which actions you will take, and how you will respond when circumstances interfere. Effective goal setting connects a meaningful direction to an executable plan, realistic opportunities, and useful feedback.
A goal can be genuinely important and still fail to become action. The scientific evidence supports setting goals, preparing specific action plans, and monitoring progress as complementary strategies. In a systematic review of randomized trials, Epton, Currie, and Armitage (2017) found a small positive average effect of goal setting on behavior change. Their findings establish an empirical starting point: specifying a goal can help, and its effectiveness depends on the task and circumstances.
This guide presents an evidence-informed method for setting personal, educational, professional, and everyday behavioral goals. It explains the psychology of follow-through, gives a detailed worked example, examines SMART goals and WOOP, and distinguishes research-supported strategies from popular oversimplifications.
For a broader perspective on the psychology of this topic, see Goal-Setting Theory: How Specific Goals Affect Performance.
What Makes a Goal Effective?
In psychology, a goal is a represented desired state or outcome that can guide attention, decisions, and behavior. Setting a goal means choosing that state and establishing some standard for judging progress. Pursuing a goal involves initiating actions, sustaining or adjusting them, responding to feedback, and managing competing demands.
“I want to become healthier” names a valuable direction but leaves behavior undefined. “I will walk for 20 minutes after lunch on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for the next four weeks” names an executable behavior, an opportunity, and a review period. Whether walking is medically appropriate depends on the individual, but the difference in goal structure applies across domains.
Locke and Latham's foundational review shows that specific, sufficiently challenging goals often improve task performance through attention, effort, persistence, and strategy development. Effects depend on commitment, feedback, abilities, task complexity, and situational factors. Effective goals therefore need clarity and appropriate challenge, together with a realistic route to action.
The distinction between goal setting and goal achievement matters. Stating a desired outcome does not ensure that somebody knows how to perform the necessary actions. Goals work within a broader system of motivation, learning, opportunity, planning, and self-regulation.
Why People Set Goals but Do Not Follow Through
A person may intend to exercise, study, save money, or write regularly and then find that the necessary action never occurs. Psychologists call the discrepancy between intention and subsequent behavior the intention–behavior gap. Sheeran's research review discusses how intentions relate to behavior and why they frequently fail to predict it completely.
A goal may remain abstract, have no time reserved for it, require unavailable materials, compete with urgent responsibilities, or involve an uncertain first step. Emotional avoidance and competing short-term rewards can also interfere. None of these mechanisms requires a character judgment about the individual.
Consider someone who decides on Sunday to exercise three times during the week. They never select days, arrange transportation, identify suitable activities, or account for evening childcare. The goal could be meaningful, but the opportunities have not been designed.
The missing factor may sometimes be capability or opportunity rather than motivation. The COM-B model proposed by Michie, van Stralen, and West organizes behavior around capability, opportunity, and motivation. It provides a practical question when follow-through breaks down: what is needed for this behavior to be possible, not merely desirable?
Step 1: Choose a Goal That Matters to You
Begin with the reason for wanting change. What will improve if you move toward this goal? Does the goal reflect an interest, responsibility, relationship, value, or future possibility that you personally endorse? What would pursuing it require you to give up temporarily?
Goals that connect with a person's interests and values may support more sustained engagement. In the self-concordance model, Sheldon and Elliot (1999) examined how goals aligned with people's motives relate to pursuit and well-being over time. This work supports attending to personal reasons while acknowledging that externally assigned duties can also be meaningful and necessary.
For example, “I need to improve my writing because successful people write” may create an unstable source of pressure. “I want to write more clearly so I can communicate my ideas” identifies the benefit directly. The second reason can guide choices about what to practice.
Also examine whether now is the right time. A desirable goal may compete with necessary care, employment, finances, or sleep. Choosing to delay or reduce a goal after reviewing real responsibilities can reflect sound judgment. Goal selection is a matter of priorities as well as ambition.
Try writing one sentence beginning, “This matters to me because…” If your answer is only an obligation to appear impressive, inspect the goal again. A clearer reason may emerge, or another goal may better serve the underlying value.
Step 2: Separate the Outcome From the Process
An outcome goal describes a result: pass a course, finish a manuscript, build savings, or complete a project. A process goal specifies actions within your control: attend lessons, draft for 30 minutes, review expenses, or run a test.
The distinction helps maintain agency. Someone can prepare an excellent application without controlling whether an employer offers a position. Someone can study regularly without controlling every feature of an examination. The processes remain valuable information even when the result is uncertain.
A practical goal often has both layers. The outcome might be “Complete one introductory data-analysis module within eight weeks.” The supporting process could be “Study for 30 minutes on Tuesday, Thursday, and Sunday.” The outcome sets direction; the recurring actions establish opportunities for progress.
Choose measures thoughtfully. Counting hours is easy but may not indicate comprehension or quality. When learning, combine time invested with an occasional retrieval exercise or applied problem. When writing, combine drafting sessions with review of clarity and accuracy. The measurement should help you understand progress toward the real aim.
Step 3: Specify the Next Observable Action
Turn “be more organized” into something that a person could observe, such as sorting the next week's appointments every Sunday. Replace “work harder on my novel” with “revise the opening scene for 40 minutes on Saturday morning.”
Specificity helps because it reduces the choices required at the moment of action. It also makes failure to start more informative: you can ask whether the time, cue, or task was unsuitable. Vague aspirations make that diagnosis difficult.
Specific goals do not need to be rigid or overly numerical. A researcher beginning a complex investigation might set a learning goal: locate three primary papers, compare their methods, and identify one unresolved question. This can be more appropriate than promising a publishable conclusion before knowing what the evidence will show.
Locke and Latham (2006) explain why task complexity and feedback alter the effects of goal difficulty. When the route is unknown, learning and experimentation may be the correct immediate objectives.
Step 4: Set an Appropriately Challenging, Feasible Target
Goal-setting research often favors specific and challenging standards over vague instructions to do one's best. Yet a useful challenge depends on what a person can actually do with the skills, time, and resources available.
Estimate the workload. How long will each session require? Which days already contain major commitments? Which tools or permissions are needed? Is there a learning curve? What would happen to essential rest or care responsibilities if the plan were followed?
The Epton et al. meta-analysis reported an average positive effect for goal setting and examined moderators, including difficulty. It does not establish a rule that the most difficult imaginable target produces the best result in every domain.
A person with one hour of free time on most evenings should not construct a routine requiring three hours every evening. A smaller initial target can reveal what is sustainable; a later review may justify increasing it. Challenge can increase as capability develops.
Feasibility also includes safety. Training through pain, restricting essential sleep, or making medically inappropriate changes in pursuit of a numerical target is inconsistent with responsible goal setting. Goals involving significant health concerns should reflect qualified advice when appropriate.
Step 5: Divide a Long-Term Goal Into Milestones
Big goals often contain different kinds of work. Finishing a book involves research, outlining, drafting, revising, and checking material. Changing careers may require investigating options, learning skills, building examples of work, and preparing applications.
Break the desired outcome into milestones that result in something inspectable. A writer could aim to finish a chapter outline, draft one complete section, and then review a coherent chapter. A learner might progress from understanding a concept to applying it independently.
Work backward from the intended result to identify prerequisites, but schedule forward from the next doable action. The first step should be small enough to begin and significant enough to create information or progress.
For unfamiliar projects, the first milestone may be uncertainty reduction. “Compare two feasible approaches and test one” is a meaningful milestone even if the final deliverable is not yet fully specified.
Milestone dates are estimates. When real work reveals unexpected complexity, update the timeline. Feedback is part of competent planning, not evidence that the original ambition was misguided.
Step 6: Decide When and Where the Action Will Happen
A goal without a defined opportunity easily competes with whatever happens next. Reserve a specific time or attach the behavior to a recognizable event. “I will study more” leaves the start undecided. “After breakfast on Monday and Wednesday, I will work through practice questions for 25 minutes at the kitchen table” provides a trigger.
Implementation intentions are if–then plans that connect a situation to an action. In a review of 94 independent tests, Gollwitzer and Sheeran (2006) found a positive average effect on goal attainment. The research supports concrete planning, with effectiveness varying across tasks and contexts.
An example is: “If I finish lunch on Friday, then I will open my financial spreadsheet and review this week's expenses.” Another: “If my meeting is canceled, then I will use the released half hour for the project outline.”
Plans are most useful when they correspond to events that actually occur. If mornings are unpredictable, an evening cue or a flexible but protected time window may work better.
The implementation intention should describe something you can do rather than an emotional state you hope to feel. “If I feel motivated, then I will work” leaves action dependent on an uncertain condition. “If my scheduled work period begins, then I will open the document and start the first task” creates a more direct link.
Step 7: Make Starting Manageable
Starting is often a distinct difficulty from continuing. Select an opening action that reduces friction: prepare materials, open a document, read the first page, or complete a brief warm-up. A manageable start can help reveal whether the obstacle is uncertainty, setup, available time, or the work itself.
Popular productivity advice sometimes promises that a task lasting two minutes will transform all subsequent behavior. Evidence does not establish a universal minimum duration that guarantees follow-through. The useful principle is to lower unnecessary starting demands while preserving a path toward meaningful progress.
Consider three levels of action: a minimum session for unusually difficult days, a standard session that fits ordinary conditions, and an optional extended session when time and energy allow. For example, a learner might review five flashcards on a difficult day, study for 25 minutes ordinarily, and tackle a longer practice exercise when possible.
The minimum is a continuity option, not a mandatory substitute for every full session. If several weeks show that only the minimum is feasible, reconsider whether the original target or schedule needs revision.
Step 8: Predict Obstacles and Make Backup Plans
Name the most likely obstacles before they occur. A plan for writing may fail because of interruptions, uncertainty about the next section, or difficulty accessing references. A walking plan may fail because of weather, travel, or a change in physical condition.
Choose responses matched to those obstacles. For interruptions, secure a quieter opportunity. For uncertainty, define a research or learning task. For limited access, prepare materials in advance. For an unexpectedly late meeting, schedule a short alternative session.
Mental contrasting involves considering a desired future together with a real obstacle. It can be combined with an if–then plan. A 2021 meta-analysis by Wang, Wang, and Gai found a small-to-moderate average benefit for this combination in the included field studies, while also reporting heterogeneity and possible publication bias.
The evidence supports trying realistic obstacle planning, with expectations appropriate to its limitations. No script can make unavailable childcare, transportation, money, or medical care appear. Sometimes the first necessary action is to obtain support or change the conditions.
An obstacle response might read: “If a late meeting displaces my study session, then I will complete a 10-minute review during my next available break and move the longer session to Saturday.” This keeps the goal connected to the calendar.
Step 9: Arrange the Environment for the Behavior
Change practical conditions so that the intended action is easier to start. Place needed materials where they are accessible. Reduce unnecessary setup. Make the relevant document easy to open. Remove avoidable distractions when possible.
The COM-B framework is helpful here because the same visible difficulty can have different causes. One person cannot begin because they lack a skill. Another lacks a quiet workspace. A third faces a competing priority. Each situation calls for a different response.
Social help can support goals through scheduling, access, shared responsibilities, or useful feedback. Ask for the form of support that addresses the obstacle. Accountability can be useful when voluntarily chosen, but pressure and surveillance may create problems of their own.
A good environment reduces the amount of repeated deliberate effort needed to perform an action. That does not mean habit automaticity has already developed. Learned habits, conscious goals, and situational supports are related but distinct constructs.
Step 10: Monitor Progress Without Turning Life Into a Dashboard
Keep a simple record of intended actions, completed actions, and relevant outcomes. A short weekly note may be enough. Track information that can change your decisions rather than measuring everything that can be counted.
A systematic review and meta-analysis by Harkin and colleagues (2016) examined 138 randomized studies involving 19,951 participants. Interventions that increased progress monitoring improved goal attainment on average; some effects were larger when progress was recorded or reported.
That finding supports monitoring as a useful strategy but establishes no mandatory app, frequency, or level of detail. A notebook, calendar, simple spreadsheet, or brief written reflection can serve the function.
Distinguish leading indicators from outcomes. Sessions completed are leading indicators of engagement. Knowledge gained, money saved, and project quality are outcomes. If sessions accumulate without useful progress, the process may need to change.
Set a review cadence proportionate to the work. Weekly reviews can help with short-term routines. Monthly checks or project milestones may suit slower changes. The point is to detect useful patterns and decide what to do next.
Stop tracking information that becomes intrusive, misleading, or excessively burdensome. Monitoring should support the activity instead of consuming the time meant for it.
Step 11: Revise the Plan When Reality Changes
A missed session provides evidence about a particular interaction between a person, a task, and circumstances. It may reveal a weak cue, excessive task size, an unrealistic schedule, inadequate resources, or an unexpected interruption.
Ask what happened and choose an adjustment. Restore the plan if the interruption was exceptional. Shorten the session if the original workload was too high. Change the time if the chosen opportunity regularly disappears. Seek training or support if lack of capability is the main barrier.
Avoid compensating for missed work by automatically doubling future demands. That can create a cycle in which each setback makes the next attempt less feasible.
Persistence is appropriate when the goal remains valuable and a credible route exists. Revising or ending an obsolete goal can also be rational. Goal pursuit should remain connected to the purpose that justified it.
A successful week need not mean flawless adherence. It can mean that the record helped you discover what works and update the next week's plan intelligently.
A Complete Example: Setting a Learning Goal
Imagine a person employed full time who wants to learn basic data analysis. Their initial aspiration is “Get better with data.” It offers direction but gives little guidance about what to do tonight.
First, they identify a meaningful purpose: to interpret information more confidently at work and explore whether they enjoy the subject. Then they select an eight-week outcome: complete an introductory course module and analyze a small dataset.
Next, they choose process actions: three 30-minute study sessions per week, with an applied exercise every other week. They inspect their calendar and select Tuesday and Friday evenings and Sunday afternoons. Their plan specifies the starting cue and the first task: open the course, review the previous notes, and complete one exercise.
They anticipate that Tuesday may be interrupted by overtime. Their alternative is a 10-minute review that evening followed by moving the longer session to Saturday. They also expect unfamiliar exercises to be difficult, so they schedule a brief research step whenever they become stuck.
Each Sunday, they record study sessions completed, problems solved independently, unresolved questions, and whether the planned times remain feasible. After two weeks they discover that Thursday-like weekday demands make Tuesday unreliable. They shift that session to Saturday morning.
This change preserves the purpose while improving the fit between the goal and everyday life. At eight weeks they can evaluate both the completed module and what they actually learned. If the project proceeds slowly, they have evidence for choosing a new timetable.
Goal Setting for Different Life Domains
Learning and complex problem-solving
When a task is unfamiliar, set goals for acquiring skills, exploring alternatives, practicing retrieval, or receiving feedback. Overly rigid performance targets can encourage superficial strategies when the individual has not yet developed a reliable method. The goal-setting theory review by Locke and Latham distinguishes conditions affecting learning and performance.
Creative projects
Creative work involves discovery and revision. Organize progress around drafts, tested ideas, outlines, and reviewable sections. Word counts or hours can help with scheduling, but accuracy, originality, coherence, and creative quality remain relevant outcomes.
Health-related behavior
Use plans compatible with health status, capacity, and access. Some people can reasonably aim to prepare meals or gradually establish movement routines; others require medically informed targets. Symptoms, chronic conditions, medication changes, and significant physical limitations may warrant guidance from a qualified professional.
Career and finances
Separate controllable behaviors from external decisions. Applications prepared, skills practiced, and expenses reviewed are actions. Job offers, market returns, or unexpected costs are outcomes influenced by conditions beyond personal control. Track both without promising a specific result.
Relationships
You can set goals for your own conduct, such as making time for a conversation, listening attentively, or fulfilling agreed responsibilities. You cannot control another person's feelings or choices. Shared aims benefit from discussion and mutual agreement.
Are SMART Goals the Best Method?
SMART usually means specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound, although variations exist. It is a useful checklist for spotting vague targets, absent feedback, or unrealistic timeframes. For instance, “I will practice for 20 minutes three evenings each week for a month” is clearer than “I will practice more.”
The acronym itself should not be treated as a universally validated scientific theory. Evidence supports several elements that overlap with SMART, including goal specificity, appropriate difficulty, and monitoring. It does not establish that every successful goal requires exactly five named criteria or that writing them down guarantees achievement.
A creative research project may need a flexible milestone rather than a rigid metric. The correct choice depends on what kind of feedback can meaningfully guide the work.
The separate planned EN-27 article “SMART Goals: What They Are, Examples, and Evidence Limits” owns the detailed analysis of that checklist. The present guide focuses on the broader evidence-informed process of setting and following through on goals.
Does WOOP Help?
WOOP stands for wish, outcome, obstacle, and plan. It combines mental contrasting with a response plan. The user identifies a feasible wish, considers its desired outcome, names an important obstacle, and creates an if–then response.
A meta-analysis of mental contrasting with implementation intentions found an average benefit, while noting heterogeneity and signs of publication bias. It offers reasonable support for trying the strategy, but not proof that the method always works or outperforms all alternatives.
For example: “I want to finish the first section of my report. Completing it will make the full project easier to coordinate. My main obstacle is responding to messages while drafting. If I begin a writing session, then I will close the messaging app for 25 minutes.” This plan is useful insofar as the identified obstacle and response fit the actual situation.
How Many Goals Should You Pursue at Once?
There is no research-established universal ideal number. A person may handle several simple routines while having capacity for only one demanding long-term project. The relevant variables include task complexity, conflicting commitments, available time, and required resources.
List active goals alongside their real weekly demands. If the total does not fit the calendar, reduce the scope, sequence the goals, or postpone a lower-priority commitment. Goals should be evaluated together because they can either support or interfere with one another.
More goals create more potential opportunities for conflict. An intensive evening course, additional work commitments, and a demanding exercise program may each sound reasonable separately. They may still be incompatible when combined with family responsibilities and necessary sleep.
Goals, Motivation, Habits, and Self-Control
Motivation concerns the processes that direct and energize behavior. Self-regulation encompasses guiding behavior toward goals; self-control often concerns handling competing impulses or responses. Habits involve learned tendencies to respond more automatically to contextual cues. These constructs can contribute to the same activity through different mechanisms.
A valued goal may initiate a routine. A specific plan makes the start more predictable. Repeating the action under suitable conditions may gradually support habit learning, while some situations still require deliberate control. Goal setting does not itself establish automaticity, and a motivational feeling is not a prerequisite for every planned action.
Detailed explanations of those mechanisms belong to other EN-27 canonical owners. This article retains the practical search intent of helping a reader select and carry out a workable goal, with future English internal links added as the cluster is published.
When Goal Setting Is Not Enough
Some difficulties with goal pursuit arise from ordinary overload, conflicting responsibilities, uncertainty, avoidance, inadequate opportunity, or limited skills. Others may occur alongside significant symptoms or health conditions. The distinction depends on a broader clinical picture, including symptom duration, severity, impairment, and professional evaluation.
Persistent loss of interest or pleasure may require evaluation, particularly alongside other symptoms of depression. ADHD-related executive difficulties, anxiety, or other conditions also require their own standards of assessment. Procrastination does not establish ADHD, and a missed goal does not establish a mental disorder.
Where functioning has changed substantially, a qualified professional can help determine whether evaluation or treatment is appropriate. If immediate safety concerns or severe symptoms are present, appropriate urgent care takes priority over a self-help worksheet.
What the Scientific Evidence Can and Cannot Establish
Three conclusions have especially direct support. Goal-setting interventions produce a modest positive average effect on behavior change in the trials reviewed by Epton et al.. Implementation intentions help some people convert intentions into action, as synthesized by Gollwitzer and Sheeran. Progress monitoring improves goal attainment on average across the trials reviewed by Harkin et al..
These studies examine different techniques, outcomes, and populations. Their effect sizes cannot be added together to predict an individual's improvement. Some interventions combine several components, many outcomes are short-term, and laboratory or structured-program findings do not always transfer unchanged into everyday settings.
The practical application is to use goal clarity, realistic planning, and feedback as tools for making better decisions. Adapt them to individual needs and circumstances. A goal-setting system is most useful when it increases effective action and protects the underlying purpose.
A Goal-Setting Worksheet You Can Reuse
Use these eight questions as a brief planning exercise:
1. Purpose: What change matters to me, and why? 2. Outcome: What result would count as meaningful progress? 3. Process: Which actions can I personally take? 4. Opportunity: When and where will those actions happen? 5. Resources: What tools, skills, time, money, or help do I need? 6. Obstacles: What is likely to interrupt me, and what will I do then? 7. Feedback: What will I record, and when will I review it? 8. Adjustment: What evidence would lead me to revise or end the goal?
A finished version might say: “For six weeks, I will practice conversational Spanish for 20 minutes after breakfast on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. If I miss a session, I will complete a short vocabulary review at the next available opportunity. Every Sunday I will note what I practiced and choose one task for the following week.”
The point is not to create the most complicated plan. The point is to clarify a meaningful direction and make its next actions possible.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best way to set goals and achieve them?
Select a goal you value, define a concrete outcome, choose actions within your control, reserve opportunities for those actions, anticipate obstacles, and monitor progress. Review the results and adjust. These components align with several established lines of goal-setting and self-regulation research.
Should I choose realistic or challenging goals?
Choose appropriately challenging goals that are feasible given the task, resources, and your current capabilities. For unfamiliar work, start with a learning goal. Difficulty alone is not a measure of quality.
What is the difference between a goal and a habit?
A goal is a desired state or standard. A habit is a learned pattern of responding that can become relatively automatic in recurring contexts. Repetition may contribute to habit formation, but a written goal does not create a habit on its own.
Is writing down a goal enough to make it happen?
Writing can clarify intentions and make review easier. Follow-through still requires opportunity, action, and adjustment. Progress-monitoring research supports recording progress in some conditions, but merely writing an aspiration is not a guarantee.
What should I do if I keep missing my goals?
Identify the main obstacle and redesign one part of the plan. Consider timing, resources, task size, competing obligations, and emotional barriers. A persistent mismatch can justify changing the goal itself.
How often should I check my progress?
Check often enough to generate useful feedback. Weekly reviews work for many routines; longer projects may require milestone reviews. The research supports monitoring generally rather than one universal interval.
Can I set goals when I feel unmotivated?
Yes. Start with a manageable action and examine whether the goal still matters, whether the circumstances support it, and whether additional help is required. Persistent and broad loss of interest or substantial functional impairment deserves more specific attention.
Are SMART goals scientifically proven?
Goal specificity, planning, and feedback have scientific support. The SMART acronym is a practical checklist with variable definitions, and evidence for the entire five-letter package as a universally superior method is limited.
How long should a goal take?
Choose a timeline based on the actual work, not an arbitrary number of days. Use milestones and revise estimates as new information appears. Complex creative projects and health-related changes may require particularly flexible timetables.
Is focusing on the process better than focusing on results?
Both provide useful information. The outcome supplies direction, while the process specifies repeatable actions. Evaluate whether the chosen process is helping produce the desired outcome rather than tracking activity alone.
Related Articles
Motivation in the Age of AI: Effort, Goals, Self-Efficacy, and Human Agency explores effort and human agency in AI-mediated environments.
High vs Low Conscientiousness: Organization, Self-Control, and Flexibility examines personality differences relevant to planning and persistence.
Why Can't I Stop Scrolling? Habit, Boredom, Reward, and Stopping Cues examines a common digital obstacle to following through on planned actions.
Anhedonia in Depression: Loss of Interest, Pleasure, and Motivation explains a distinct clinical context involving reduced interest and pleasure.
References
Epton, T., Currie, S., & Armitage, C. J. (2017). Unique effects of setting goals on behavior change: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(12), 1182–1198. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000260
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
Harkin, B., Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., Prestwich, A., Conner, M., Kellar, I., Benn, Y., & Sheeran, P. (2016). Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 142(2), 198–229. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000025
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. PubMed record
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M., & West, R. (2011). The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science, 6, 42. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention–behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. DOI: 10.1080/14792772143000003
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497. PubMed record
Wang, G., Wang, Y., & Gai, X. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effects of mental contrasting with implementation intentions on goal attainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 565202. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202