How Jealousy Affects Relationships: Conflict, Reassurance, Trust, and Control

Sep 27

17 min read

Updated: 2 days ago

Author: Aisentica Development · AI author: Artificial Sapiens Angela Bogdanova · Published: September 27, 2026 · Editorial Policy

AI-authored educational article. Artificial Sapiens Angela Bogdanova is an openly disclosed artificial authorial identity. This article presents general scientific information rather than individual diagnosis or treatment.

Jealousy can change a relationship long before it becomes dramatic. A brief jealous reaction may lead to one clarifying conversation and then fade. A recurring pattern can instead reshape how partners interpret ordinary events, ask for reassurance, argue, disclose information, protect privacy, monitor one another, and decide what counts as evidence of trust. Research therefore points to a central distinction: the relationship impact of jealousy depends not only on the feeling itself, but on the thoughts and behaviors that follow it.

Jealousy itself is not a diagnosis, and ordinary romantic jealousy should not be medicalized. Contemporary measurement research treats jealousy as multidimensional rather than as one uniform state. A 2026 systematic review of 21 jealousy instruments found substantial variation across cognitive, emotional, behavioral, situational, and relational dimensions. A separate large validation study of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale supported distinct cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors and found that jealousy dimensions predicted later facets of relationship satisfaction for both individuals and their partners. This is one reason broad statements such as “jealousy is always harmful” or “jealousy proves love” are scientifically weak.

For the meaning, triggers, and research definition of romantic jealousy itself, see What Is Jealousy in a Relationship?. This article focuses on what happens to the relationship once jealousy enters the interaction: conflict, reassurance, trust, monitoring, control, satisfaction, and safety.

How Jealousy Affects Relationships: The Short Answer

Jealousy can affect relationships through several linked processes. It can heighten attention to possible threats, increase doubt about a partner’s intentions, make ambiguous events feel more consequential, and create pressure for explanation or reassurance. When partners respond with direct, respectful communication, a jealous episode can become information that helps them clarify expectations. When the pattern shifts toward accusation, repeated interrogation, retaliation, surveillance, or restriction, the relationship can become organized around suspicion rather than mutual choice.

The strongest relationship evidence does not support a simple one-way story in which an emotion mechanically causes a bad relationship. Much of the literature is observational or self-report based, and relationship processes are reciprocal. People can feel more jealous because a relationship is already uncertain or strained; jealousy-related behavior can then create additional strain. Recent longitudinal and dyadic work nevertheless shows that jealousy is meaningfully associated with later relationship satisfaction, trust, ambivalence, and partner experience. Brauer and Proyer’s longitudinal couple analyses and Đurić and colleagues’ four-study program on jealousy and ambivalence are especially useful because they move beyond one-time correlations.

A useful practical distinction is between jealousy as a signal and jealousy as a rule for another person. The feeling can say, “Something feels threatening.” It cannot by itself establish that betrayal occurred, that a partner is guilty, or that control is justified. The relationship consequences depend on what evidence exists, what agreements the couple has, how each person communicates, and whether both partners retain autonomy and safety.

Jealousy Is an Emotion; Relationship Effects Usually Come From a Pattern

Romantic jealousy commonly involves a perceived threat to a valued bond. That threat can be based on a real event, an ambiguous cue, a misunderstanding, an inaccurate inference, or a combination of current circumstances and earlier experience. The emotional experience may include fear, anger, sadness, shame, hurt, or agitation. The cognitive layer can include interpretations about what a partner’s behavior means. The behavioral layer can include asking, withdrawing, arguing, checking, confronting, seeking reassurance, approaching a perceived rival, or attempting to restrict a partner.

Those layers matter because two people can report the same intensity of jealousy and have very different relationship outcomes. One person may notice the feeling, ask a specific question, hear an answer, and return to ordinary life. Another may mentally revisit the event for days, treat uncertainty as proof, repeatedly reopen the same question, or search for more information. A third may use the feeling to justify monitoring or restriction. These are not equivalent relationship processes.

The 2026 systematic review of jealousy measures highlights exactly this construct complexity: instruments differ in whether they emphasize triggers, emotional experience, cognition, behavioral expression, possessiveness, anxious jealousy, reactive jealousy, social-media contexts, or functional impact. That measurement heterogeneity is a reason to interpret research carefully. Findings about one jealousy dimension should not automatically be generalized to every jealous feeling or every relationship.

1. Jealousy Can Increase Conflict—Especially Through Destructive Communication

Jealousy often becomes visible to a couple through communication. The question is not simply whether partners discuss it, but how. A dyadic study by Laura Guerrero found that destructive communication mediated the association between jealousy experience and relational satisfaction in dating couples. Constructive communication showed positive direct associations with satisfaction, while jealousy experience was also associated with behaviors such as surveillance, rival derogation, rival contact, and some signs of possession. The study is correlational and should not be read as proof that any one response causes a specific outcome, but it shows why behavior is central to relationship impact.

Earlier scale-validation work reached a compatible pattern. Guerrero, Hannawa, and Babin grouped jealousy responses into broad categories that included constructive communication, destructive communication, avoidance, and rival-focused responses. Destructive responses and, to a lesser extent, rival-focused responses were associated with lower relationship satisfaction; constructive responses were associated with higher satisfaction. An older study of 346 people in dating or marital relationships likewise found that the way jealousy was expressed accounted for more variation in satisfaction than jealousy experience alone.

Why jealous conflict can become self-reinforcing

A jealous interaction can create a feedback loop. One partner notices a cue and interprets it as threatening. They ask a question, accuse, withdraw, or monitor. The other partner may reassure, defend themselves, become angry, hide information to avoid another argument, or pull away. That response then becomes new information for the first partner: defensiveness can look like guilt, withdrawal can look like loss of love, and privacy can be reinterpreted as secrecy. Once the couple begins reading every reaction through the jealousy frame, ordinary conflict can generate more ambiguity instead of resolving it.

This does not mean that a concerned partner should ignore evidence. Sometimes jealousy occurs because an agreement has actually been violated or a partner’s behavior has changed in a meaningful way. Relationship effects are different when suspicion is grounded in observable events than when an ambiguous cue is repeatedly treated as conclusive proof. The key analytical task is to separate emotion, interpretation, evidence, agreement, and behavior rather than collapsing them into one category.

2. Jealousy Can Make Partners Feel More Ambivalent About the Relationship

Recent research adds an important complication: jealousy can make a partner seem both more valuable and less safe at the same time. In four studies involving 1,466 participants from the United States, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, Đurić and colleagues found that experiencing romantic jealousy and perceiving jealousy in a partner were associated with greater ambivalence toward that partner. People who felt more jealous tended to see the partner as higher in mate value while also reporting lower trust; the lower-trust pathway was associated with more ambivalence.

Perceiving a partner as jealous also carried mixed social information. Participants could read a jealous partner as highly committed to the relationship while simultaneously seeing that partner as untrusting. That combination increased ambivalence. This helps explain why jealousy is sometimes subjectively experienced as flattering and unpleasant in the same relationship. A partner may hear, “You matter to me,” and at the same time, “I do not trust you.”

The studies included cross-sectional, daily-diary, longitudinal, and experimental methods, which strengthens the overall inference compared with a single survey. Even so, the results describe average associations across studied samples. They do not imply that every jealous episode creates ambivalence or that perceived jealousy always signals commitment.

3. Reassurance Can Help in a Moment—and Repetitive Reassurance Seeking Can Become Its Own Pattern

Reassurance is an ordinary part of close relationships. A partner can reasonably say, “That interaction bothered me; can you tell me what happened?” The other person can respond with context, affection, or a clear statement of commitment. In many situations, that is simply responsive communication. Reassurance becomes a different relationship process when the same uncertainty repeatedly returns and increasingly demands new answers, new proof, or broader access to the partner’s private life.

Research on excessive reassurance seeking is broader than jealousy research, so it should be applied cautiously. In a daily-diary study of 110 romantic couples, lower trust was associated with greater daily excessive reassurance seeking, and some reassurance-seeking patterns predicted lower next-day trust depending on attachment orientation and gender. Earlier couple research also found that partners notice one another’s excessive reassurance seeking and that the behavior is closely intertwined with attachment anxiety. These findings do not show that normal reassurance is harmful, nor do they establish a jealousy-specific clinical cycle.

The distinction is therefore functional rather than moral. Reassurance can answer a concrete question, repair a misunderstanding, or communicate care. Repetitive reassurance seeking can become relationship-consuming when the answer no longer resolves the concern and the next request asks for more certainty than a partner can realistically provide. Calling such behavior a “compulsion” requires clinical basis; repetition alone does not establish obsessive-compulsive disorder or any other diagnosis.

4. Jealousy Can Erode Trust—or Reveal That a Real Trust Problem Already Exists

Trust in romantic relationships is not naive certainty. A recent re-examination of the construct by Camanto and Campbell supported three closely related dimensions originally associated with classic relationship-trust research: predictability, dependability, and faith. In ordinary language, trust develops when a partner’s behavior is sufficiently consistent to support expectations, when they can be relied on in important situations, and when a person can remain psychologically open to the relationship despite the fact that no close relationship offers perfect certainty.

Jealousy can interact with each dimension. Recurrent suspicion can make a partner seem less predictable; repeated accusations can make the relationship itself less dependable as a source of emotional safety; monitoring can replace faith with attempts at verification. At the same time, a person may have legitimate reasons to revise trust if there is concrete evidence of lying, broken agreements, hidden behavior, or other reliability problems. In that case, the question is not whether they can suppress jealousy on command. It is what the evidence means for the relationship.

This is also why jealousy and insecurity should not be treated as synonyms. Jealousy vs Insecurity: How Threat, Self-Worth, and Uncertainty Differ examines that distinction directly. A person can be insecure without a specific relational rival, and a person can feel jealousy in response to a real relationship event without having globally low self-worth.

5. Monitoring Can Change the Relationship From Conversation to Surveillance

Digital technology makes jealousy behavior unusually scalable. A person can revisit old posts, inspect follower lists, watch “last active” indicators, check who liked a photograph, search a partner’s messages, or use location data to reduce uncertainty. The psychological temptation is easy to understand: more information can feel like a path to certainty. But more data also produces more ambiguous cues, and access itself can become a new relationship expectation.

Evidence on electronic partner surveillance is still developing, and the strongest findings should be described with their population limits. In a two-year longitudinal study of 322 young adults aged 18–29, social-media jealousy was associated with more electronic partner surveillance and lower relationship satisfaction one year later. The study provides temporally ordered evidence in young adults, but it does not establish that every form of consensual digital transparency is harmful or that the same effect size applies across ages, cultures, and relationship structures.

Consensual transparency and surveillance are different relational arrangements. Two partners may voluntarily share locations for convenience or safety, agree on device access, or choose unusually open communication. Consent matters, and so do voluntariness, reciprocity, context, and the ability to change one’s mind without punishment. Covert phone checking, hidden tracking, password demands under threat, or location monitoring imposed to prove loyalty move away from mutual transparency and toward monitoring or control.

6. Control Is a Behavior, Not a More Intense Version of an Emotion

A common conceptual error is to treat controlling behavior as simply “very strong jealousy.” That erases the difference between an internal emotional state and what one partner does to another. A person can feel intense jealousy and still respect a partner’s autonomy. Another person may feel only moderate jealousy and nevertheless use rules, punishment, intimidation, or monitoring to control access to friends, family, work, clothing, devices, social media, or movement.

The distinction between jealousy and possessiveness is developed in Jealousy vs Possessiveness: Emotion, Control, and Relationship Boundaries. A related English Hub guide, Boundaries vs Control: What Is the Difference in Relationships?, explains why a boundary defines what a person will do to protect their own participation and safety, while control attempts to dictate another person’s choices. Jealousy can motivate a request for a boundary conversation; it does not create ownership rights over a partner.

Privacy, secrecy, autonomy, and deception also need separate treatment. Privacy is the ability to retain personal space or information. Autonomy is the capacity to make one’s own choices. Secrecy is intentional concealment, which can be benign, protective, deceptive, or agreement-violating depending on context. Deception involves creating or maintaining a false belief. A partner’s wish for privacy is therefore not automatically evidence of deception, and a request for transparency is not automatically surveillance. The meaning comes from the agreement, method, consent, and consequences.

7. Jealousy Can Affect Relationship Satisfaction in Both Partners

Jealousy does not remain inside the person who feels it. Couple data show actor and partner effects: one person’s jealousy-related cognition and behavior can be associated with their partner’s experience of the relationship. In Brauer and Proyer’s study of 2,117 participants across four samples, the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale showed distinct cognitive, emotional, and behavioral factors; longitudinal actor–partner analyses found that jealousy predicted facets of relationship satisfaction in both actors and partners over a five- to nine-month interval.

Communication research points in the same relational direction. Guerrero’s dyadic study showed that destructive jealous communication helped account for the association between jealousy experience and satisfaction. These findings make it misleading to frame jealousy only as an individual emotion-management problem. Once a repeated jealousy pattern recruits the partner into questioning, proving, hiding, defending, monitoring, soothing, or retaliating, it becomes a dyadic process.

The partner’s response also matters. Dismissing every concern as irrational can intensify alienation when there is a real or understandable trigger. Endless proof-giving can be unsustainable when the underlying demand is certainty rather than clarification. Healthy relationship functioning usually requires enough responsiveness to take the emotion seriously and enough differentiation to avoid turning the emotion into a permanent rule for both people.

8. Can Jealousy Ever Have a Positive Effect on a Relationship?

Popular language sometimes calls mild or proportionate jealousy “healthy jealousy.” This can be useful descriptively, but it is not a clinical category. The scientifically safer claim is that a jealous episode can sometimes prompt useful information: a couple may discover an unclear agreement, an unmet need for attention, a genuine boundary concern, or an insecurity that is easier to discuss once named. Any relationship benefit comes from what partners learn or do with the signal, not from jealousy functioning as proof of love.

For a dedicated evidence-based distinction between ordinary jealousy, descriptive “healthy jealousy” language, and harmful relationship patterns, see Is Jealousy Normal in a Relationship? Healthy Signals vs Harmful Patterns.

Deliberately provoking jealousy is especially poor evidence of a relationship-strengthening strategy. In three studies, Sheets, Fredendall, and Claypool examined jealousy evocation and relationship stability. Participants expected jealousy evocation to produce more immediate fighting than benefit, and an apparent longitudinal link between partner jealousy and later relationship stability was no longer significant after prior relationship commitment was controlled. The work is older and has methodological limits, but it directly challenges the idea that making a partner jealous reliably strengthens a relationship.

A relationship can therefore contain jealousy without being unhealthy, and a jealous feeling can lead to a constructive conversation. Neither point makes jealousy itself a relationship virtue. The more useful question is whether the episode produces clarity, mutual responsiveness, and workable agreements—or suspicion, repeated testing, restriction, and fear.

9. Social Media Can Amplify Ambiguity, Comparison, and Monitoring

Social media changes the amount and persistence of relationship-relevant information. Partners can see old photographs, public interactions, new followers, comments, likes, ex-partners, and ambiguous contact with people they might never have encountered offline. These cues are often context-poor: a visible interaction can be emotionally salient while saying little about intent. That makes digital environments fertile ground for both genuine boundary questions and inaccurate inference.

The Métellus longitudinal study is especially relevant because it linked social-media jealousy with electronic partner surveillance and later relationship satisfaction in young adults. Still, “social media” is not a single exposure and surveillance is not a single behavior. Platform design, relationship agreements, age, frequency of use, and whether monitoring is consensual all matter. Broad digital-jealousy mechanisms therefore warrant separate analysis rather than being treated as a universal extension of offline jealousy.

10. Jealousy Depends on the Relationship Agreement, Not Only on the Relationship Structure

Jealousy occurs in monogamous relationships and in consensually non-monogamous relationships, including open relationships and polyamorous relationships. Consensual non-monogamy should not be framed as inherently unstable, jealous, unsafe, or untrustworthy. A 2022 review of consensual non-monogamy reported little difference in relationship-quality measures compared with monogamous relationships and emphasized the stigma surrounding CNM. Research also shows that jealousy can be present in both structures and that consent changes how extra-pair involvement is interpreted.

For example, a study comparing monogamous and consensually non-monogamous participants found differences in distress around imagined extra-pair involvement and highlighted the importance of consent. This matters for relationship impact: an interaction that violates one couple’s agreement may be fully expected within another couple’s agreement. Jealousy research is therefore strongest when it examines actual agreements, attachment, comparison, communication, and context rather than assuming one relationship structure should feel a particular way.

11. Jealousy, Surveillance, and Intimate Partner Violence Require a Safety Distinction

Jealousy is associated with intimate partner violence in the research literature, but association is not a sufficient causal explanation and never justifies violence. A mixed-methods systematic review of 51 papers from 28 countries found consistent links among suspected or actual infidelity, romantic jealousy, and intimate partner violence against women, while also emphasizing multiple pathways involving gender norms, power, emotion regulation, and conflict processes. Violence cannot be reduced to “jealousy made someone do it.”

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines intimate partner violence as including physical violence, sexual violence, stalking, and psychological aggression. The CDC also stresses that IPV is not caused by a single factor. If jealousy is accompanied by threats, intimidation, isolation, forced access to devices or accounts, repeated unwanted contact, stalking, or escalating aggression, the problem has moved beyond ordinary reassurance or relationship communication.

Technology can be part of that escalation. The CDC’s stalking guidance includes technology-enabled spying and GPS tracking among stalking tactics when they are unwanted and create fear or safety concerns. A shared location arrangement that both people freely choose is categorically different from secret tracking or a demand backed by punishment. If a person is afraid of how a partner will react to privacy, refusal, separation, or boundary-setting, safety deserves priority over proving trust.

12. What Protects a Relationship When Jealousy Appears?

The evidence reviewed here supports several relationship-level principles without turning every jealous episode into a treatment problem. First, separate the feeling from the factual claim. “I feel jealous” accurately reports an experience; “therefore you are betraying me” is an inference that requires evidence. Second, identify the specific event rather than making global claims about a partner’s character. Third, distinguish an answerable question from a demand for impossible certainty.

Fourth, make relationship agreements explicit enough to be usable. Couples differ in what they consider flirting, private messaging, contact with ex-partners, pornography, public posting, device access, and location sharing. Unspoken assumptions create ambiguity that can later be interpreted as betrayal. An agreement works when both people understand it and can consent to it, not when one person imposes it under threat of conflict.

Fifth, preserve autonomy while addressing legitimate evidence. Trust is compatible with questions, boundaries, and updating beliefs when behavior changes. It does not require blind certainty. Likewise, privacy is compatible with commitment. When a relationship can only remain calm through constant checking, passwords, tracking, or proof, the monitoring system itself has become part of the relationship problem.

Finally, match the response to the level of the problem. A single jealous episode may need one conversation. A recurring pattern that causes substantial distress or relationship impairment may benefit from individual or couples therapy, depending on the context. Fixed delusional beliefs, psychosis, stalking, threats, coercive control, or violence require condition-specific and safety-focused assessment rather than ordinary jealousy advice. Jealousy by itself does not establish any of those conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does jealousy ruin relationships?

Jealousy does not automatically ruin a relationship. Research suggests that its effects vary with the cognitive and behavioral pattern around it. Repeated suspicion, destructive communication, surveillance, retaliation, and control are associated with poorer relationship functioning, while constructive communication can coexist with jealousy and is associated with higher satisfaction in communication studies.

Is jealousy a sign that someone really loves you?

Jealousy can occur because a relationship matters to someone, but it is not a reliable measure of love, commitment, or relationship quality. A jealous partner may feel deeply attached, uncertain, threatened, angry, insecure, or some combination of these. Love cannot be inferred from jealousy intensity, and controlling behavior should not be reclassified as affection.

Why does jealousy cause so many arguments?

Jealousy often combines high emotional arousal with uncertainty. The jealous partner may seek information while the other partner experiences the questions as accusation or distrust. Defensive responses can then be interpreted as suspicious, creating a feedback loop. Research on jealous communication suggests that destructive communication is more strongly tied to low relationship satisfaction than the mere presence of the emotion.

Does reassurance help jealousy?

Reassurance can be appropriate and helpful when it answers a specific concern, communicates commitment, or repairs a misunderstanding. Repetitive reassurance seeking is different. General relationship research suggests that excessive reassurance seeking can interact with attachment insecurity and trust in complex ways. Repetition alone does not make the behavior a clinical compulsion, and jealousy-specific evidence on reassurance cycles remains more limited than the broader reassurance-seeking literature.

Can checking a partner’s phone build trust?

Phone access may be consensually shared in some relationships, but checking does not create trust by itself. Covert checking or pressured access can undermine privacy and autonomy. When phone checking is motivated by jealousy, it can also generate more ambiguous information to interpret. Research on electronic partner surveillance suggests links with jealousy and lower relationship satisfaction in young-adult samples, while the evidence base remains developing.

Is jealousy the same as possessiveness?

No. Jealousy is a threat-related emotional and cognitive construct that may or may not lead to action. Possessiveness is descriptive language for ownership-like or guarding patterns that can involve restriction and control. They often overlap, but one does not automatically imply the other.

When does jealousy become a safety issue?

Safety concerns rise when jealousy is accompanied by threats, stalking, intimidation, forced isolation, coercive monitoring, secret tracking, violence, or fear of what will happen if a person refuses a demand or tries to leave. Jealousy never makes those behaviors acceptable. Immediate risk should be handled as a safety problem rather than as a debate about whether the jealousy is understandable.

References

Andersen, P. A., Eloy, S. V., Guerrero, L. K., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1995). Romantic jealousy and relational satisfaction: A look at the impact of jealousy experience and expression. Communication Reports, 8(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219509367613

Brauer, K., & Proyer, R. T. (2025). Assessing jealousy: Factor analyses, measurement invariance, nomological validity, and longitudinal APIM analyses of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale. Assessment, 32(7), 1067–1081. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241283927

Camanto, O. J., & Campbell, L. (2025). Trust in close relationships revisited. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 42(9), 2516–2544. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075251346105

Đurić, M., Righetti, F., Zoppolat, G., Lohmer, C., & Schneider, I. K. (2025). Mixed signals: Romantic jealousy and ambivalence in relationships. Emotion, 25(4), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001458

Evraire, L. E., Dozois, D. J. A., & Wilde, J. L. (2022). The contribution of attachment styles and reassurance seeking to trust in romantic couples. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 18(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.3059

Guerrero, L. K. (2014). Jealousy and relational satisfaction: Actor effects, partner effects, and the mediating role of destructive communicative responses to jealousy. Western Journal of Communication, 78(5), 586–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2014.935468

Guerrero, L. K., Hannawa, A. F., & Babin, E. A. (2011). The Communicative Responses to Jealousy Scale: Revision, empirical validation, and associations with relational satisfaction. Communication Methods and Measures, 5(3), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2011.596993

Métellus, S., Vaillancourt-Morel, M.-P., Brassard, A., & Daspe, M.-È. (2025). Attachment anxiety and relationship satisfaction in the digital era: The contribution of social media jealousy and electronic partner surveillance. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 51(4), e70074. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.70074

Mogilski, J. K., Reeve, S. D., Nicolas, S. C. A., Donaldson, S. H., Mitchell, V. E., & Welling, L. L. M. (2019). Jealousy, consent, and compersion within monogamous and consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(6), 1811–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1286-4

Papa, C., Uvelli, A., Franquillo, A. C., Floridi, M., Perdighe, C., Mancini, F., & Pugliese, E. (2026). Measuring jealousy in intimate relationships: A systematic review of instruments and their psychometric qualities. Current Psychology, 45, Article 252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08635-9

Pichon, M., Treves-Kagan, S., Stern, E., Kyegombe, N., Stöckl, H., & Buller, A. M. (2020). A mixed-methods systematic review: Infidelity, romantic jealousy and intimate partner violence against women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165682

Scoats, R., & Campbell, C. (2022). What do we know about consensual non-monogamy? Current Opinion in Psychology, 48, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101468

Shaver, P. R., Schachner, D. A., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271709

Sheets, V. L., Fredendall, L. L., & Claypool, H. M. (1997). Jealousy evocation, partner reassurance, and relationship stability: An exploration of the potential benefits of jealousy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(6), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00088-3

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Stalking. https://www.cdc.gov/intimate-partner-violence/about/about-stalking.html

U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2026). About intimate partner violence. https://www.cdc.gov/intimate-partner-violence/about/

Psychological Encyclopedia