Functional Seizures vs Epileptic Seizures: How Clinicians Distinguish Them
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Somatic Symptom & Functional Disorders · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Functional and epileptic seizures can look remarkably similar. Both may involve shaking, staring, collapse, altered awareness, unresponsiveness, unusual sensations, or episodes that witnesses describe as convulsions. The central clinical question is how the event was generated, and the answer usually requires a careful reconstruction of what happened rather than a judgment based on appearance alone.
An epileptic seizure reflects abnormal, excessive or synchronous electrical activity in neuronal networks. A functional seizure is a genuine involuntary episode involving altered movement, awareness, sensation, or responsiveness within the spectrum of functional neurological disorder (FND). Functional seizures are also called psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), dissociative seizures, or nonepileptic attacks in different clinical and research settings. Their occurrence does not establish deliberate control, deception, or a universal psychological cause. The 2026 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) practice guideline recommends history, witness descriptions, characteristic event features, and appropriate testing to reach the greatest feasible diagnostic certainty.
The most informative test, when diagnostic ambiguity remains and the event can be captured, is synchronized video-electroencephalography (video-EEG or VEEG) documenting a representative episode. Clinicians also recognize important limits: a routine EEG between events can be normal in epilepsy, some epileptic seizures have little or no detectable scalp EEG correlate, and one person's functional and epileptic seizures can coexist. These distinctions determine the assessment, medication decisions, psychological care, and safety plan.
The essential difference: seizure mechanism and diagnosis
Epileptic seizures arise from epileptic electrical activity in brain networks; the clinical symptoms depend on which networks are involved and how activity spreads. Epilepsy itself is a diagnosis involving an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures, rather than a synonym for every single seizure. The International League Against Epilepsy's 2025 classification distinguishes focal, generalized, unknown whether focal or generalized, and unclassified epileptic seizures. Clinicians use the sequence of observable and subjective features as well as consciousness and responsiveness to describe them.
Functional seizures are episodes of impaired neurological functioning occurring without the epileptic electrical process that explains an epileptic seizure. They can be dramatic, subtle, brief, prolonged, or variable. A person may experience loss of control, movement, awareness changes, or intense bodily sensations that are entirely real. A functional diagnosis is supported by an appropriate clinical pattern and positive evidence, interpreted by professionals skilled in seizure disorders; it is not established merely because imaging or a routine EEG is normal. The ILAE diagnostic certainty framework describes a staged approach based on history, clinician-witnessed events, video, and EEG evidence.
The word psychogenic in PNES reflects historical terminology and a proposed relationship to psychological processes. It is not a requirement that every affected person have a trauma history, a psychiatric diagnosis, or an identifiable emotional trigger. Psychological and neurological processes may interact differently across individuals. Clinical explanations should be accurate, respectful, and tied to the evidence collected in that particular case.
Side-by-side comparison: what clinicians actually investigate
Duration is sometimes informative. Many focal or generalized epileptic seizures are relatively brief, whereas some functional seizures last longer or fluctuate. Yet duration alone has low specificity; prolonged epileptic seizures are a medical emergency, and functional seizures can also be short.
Movement may be comparatively stereotyped across repeated epileptic seizures from the same network, and some functional seizures demonstrate variable movement, pauses, changes in rhythm, or asynchronous limb movements. Neither pattern alone proves the diagnosis. Some frontal-lobe epileptic seizures produce complex, vigorous movements, and repeated functional episodes can be highly similar.
Eye behavior may provide evidence. A 2022 meta-analysis of seizure semiology found that ictal eye closure and asynchronous limb movements were among the most discriminating observed features favoring functional seizures in specialist monitoring samples. Their meaning depends on precisely what was observed, how the movement or eye closure occurred, and the type of epileptic seizure being considered; they are never a home diagnostic checklist.
Awareness and responsiveness can vary in both conditions. An apparent lack of response during an event, partial memory, or later confusion requires detailed examination. Some epileptic seizures preserve awareness; some alter it. Functional episodes may involve marked unresponsiveness. Neither retained memory nor apparent unresponsiveness is decisive in isolation.
Injury, falls, tongue injury, urinary incontinence, crying, and post-event fatigue may occur in different seizure presentations. Certain carefully documented findings can change clinical probability, but none should be used as a universal yes-or-no rule. A person with functional seizures may suffer serious injury, and a person with epilepsy may have seizures without conspicuous injury or convulsion.
Finally, EEG findings require timing and interpretation. Epileptiform activity during a clinically typical event can support epileptic seizure diagnosis. A normal interictal EEG does not rule out epilepsy. A representative functional event recorded on video-EEG without an epileptic ictal correlate supports a functional diagnosis when the clinical semiology, EEG interpretability, and differential diagnosis agree. The NICE epilepsy guideline explicitly cautions against using EEG to exclude epilepsy.
How the diagnostic process begins: history and witness accounts
A clinician first asks what the person experienced before, during, and after the event, ideally separately from a witness's description. The account should preserve the sequence: what the person was doing, whether an unusual smell, taste, fear, rising abdominal sensation, dizziness, palpitations, pain, visual change, or other warning occurred; whether they lost postural control; what movements began first; whether the eyes were open or closed; what could be remembered; and how recovery proceeded.
The clinician then asks how many kinds of events occur. Are all attacks similar, or are there clearly different patterns? Do events start from sleep, during exertion, after standing, with heat, during illness, or in specific social contexts? Are there recent medication changes, substance exposures, missed sleep, metabolic risks, fever, head injury, or an established epilepsy history? A single patient may need more than one explanation for separate event types.
Witnesses can describe timing, movement sequence, changes in responsiveness, breathing, color, injuries, and recovery. Their descriptions should be elicited without leading questions. Where safe and appropriate, a smartphone recording can help the neurologist review a typical episode. It should never take priority over helping the person or calling emergency services. A systematic review and meta-analysis of video-based diagnosis reported useful performance among trained reviewers, but accuracy differed with expertise and video quality, so a recording supplements the clinical assessment rather than certifying a diagnosis.
What video-EEG can establish
Video-EEG captures the person's behavior and scalp electrical activity at the same time. It allows an epilepsy specialist to compare the beginning, progression, and recovery of a representative event with the recorded EEG. The clinician also examines technical artifacts, changes in background activity, and whether the observed event matches the person's usual episodes.
When a typical event is captured and the characteristic functional semiology occurs without ictal epileptic activity detectable on an interpretable EEG, video-EEG can provide strong evidence for functional seizures. It is most useful when the electroclinical findings form a coherent whole. The diagnostic conclusion is about the specific event captured. It does not automatically establish the nature of an entirely different type of episode the patient also experiences.
A typical epileptic seizure may show an evolving ictal rhythm, or other electrical changes appropriate to its seizure type. Still, some focal seizures, especially those arising from small, deep, or difficult-to-record networks, may not produce an obvious scalp EEG pattern. Movement artifact may obscure signals. Consequently, the absence of a visible scalp ictal pattern must be assessed with the clinical appearance and the particular seizure suspected. The specialist cannot equate every negative recording with PNES.
An admission to an epilepsy monitoring unit is not required for every person, and VEEG is not always accessible or likely to capture an infrequent episode. The AAN 2026 recommendation supports obtaining video-EEG of typical events when uncertainty remains and it is feasible. Otherwise, clinicians integrate available recordings, longitudinal history, examination, routine or ambulatory EEG, and other targeted tests.
The limits of a normal routine EEG
A routine EEG usually samples a relatively short period of electrical activity, often between events. Many people with epilepsy have no interictal epileptiform discharges during that sample. A normal result therefore means the recording did not show diagnostic epileptiform findings during the observed period; it does not mean the person never had an epileptic seizure.
Conversely, an abnormal interictal EEG does not identify the mechanism of every episode occurring in someone with epilepsy. An individual may have an established epileptic disorder and a second type of functional event. Interictal abnormalities must be interpreted in context because artifacts and benign normal variants can be overread as epileptiform activity.
If suspicion for epilepsy remains after a normal test, a neurologist may consider sleep-deprived EEG, ambulatory EEG, or prolonged video-EEG depending on the clinical question. A normal MRI cannot establish functional seizures either: MRI evaluates structural questions, not the moment-by-moment mechanism of an attack. NICE NG217 outlines a clinical sequence for EEG, ECG, imaging, and additional investigations after suspected epileptic seizures.
Which observed signs carry the strongest evidence?
Clinical semiology is the pattern and sequence of signs observed during a seizure. In the Muthusamy and colleagues meta-analysis, ictal eye closure had a pooled positive likelihood ratio of 40.5 and asynchronous limb movements a pooled ratio of 10.2 for functional versus epileptic seizures, but each estimate drew on just three contributing studies. Confidence intervals were wide, and the populations came from epilepsy-monitoring units. These are research findings for clinicians interpreting recorded signs, not reliable probabilities for any single patient outside that setting.
The practical lesson is that careful observation matters, but a single feature never replaces an electroclinical assessment. A later 2025 study of neurologists' assessments of seizure videos illustrates the importance of professional interpretation and variation in judgment. Even the most informative signs become misleading if they are described imprecisely, inferred from a partial video, or applied to an epileptic syndrome with overlapping features.
Other proposed differentiators—side-to-side head movement, pelvic thrusting, vocalization, trembling, hyperventilation, and apparent suggestibility—have important overlap and limitations. Eye position at a single frame, event length alone, a patient's emotional state, or the fact that an event occurred in a stressful setting are insufficient bases for diagnosis. Clinicians should record positive evidence and describe what alternative explanations have been considered.
Can functional and epileptic seizures happen in the same person?
Yes. Coexisting epilepsy and functional seizures are established clinical phenomena. A 2018 systematic review and meta-analysis reported mean frequencies of epilepsy among patients with PNES of approximately 22%, and PNES among patients with epilepsy of approximately 12%, across heterogeneous studies. These are pooled estimates from selected observational populations, often specialty settings, not population-wide risks or an individual's probability. Their wide between-study variation makes direct extrapolation inappropriate.
When both occur, the clinician tries to distinguish the individual's recurring event types and develop separate responses. A person might have brief stereotyped epileptic seizures as well as longer episodes with a different pattern consistent with functional seizures. Episodes can change over time, so ongoing assessment is important when frequency, appearance, or recovery changes.
This is the most important reason to avoid simplifying a functional seizure diagnosis into a claim that the patient can never have epilepsy. The 2026 AAN guideline advises clinicians to evaluate for co-occurring epilepsy and psychiatric conditions when functional seizures are diagnosed. Appropriate epilepsy treatment must continue when epilepsy is also present.
Other conditions that can resemble seizures
Syncope, or transient loss of consciousness from reduced cerebral perfusion, may include brief jerking, pallor, lightheadedness, nausea, or rapid recovery. Orthostatic episodes, cardiac arrhythmias, and other cardiovascular causes require consideration when history suggests fainting. Electrocardiography and, in selected cases, blood-pressure or rhythm monitoring during episodes can clarify the diagnosis; some arrhythmias are dangerous. The AAN guideline specifically addresses evaluation for syncope when the differential is uncertain.
Panic attacks may cause shaking, breathlessness, dizziness, depersonalization, fear, and a sense of impending collapse. Panic should not be assumed solely because an attack occurred during anxiety. For the distinct panic-versus-seizure question, see our Panic Attack vs Seizure guide.
Sleep disorders, including parasomnias and some sleep-related movement disorders, can mimic seizures. Migraine variants, movement disorders, transient ischemic attack or stroke, metabolic abnormalities such as hypoglycemia, medication effects, intoxication, and other neurological or medical conditions also enter the differential according to the clinical context. Acute new neurological deficits, persistent confusion, serious head injury, or signs of systemic illness deserve urgent medical evaluation.
Episodes of dissociation may overlap phenomenologically with functional seizures, but psychiatric assessment alone cannot confirm the seizure mechanism. Trauma exposure is a possible relevant clinical factor for some patients, not a diagnostic requirement or a sufficient explanation. Diagnosis must be grounded in an event-specific neurological assessment.
Why diagnostic mistakes happen
Clinical uncertainty rises when nobody saw the onset, the event is infrequent, EEG captures no typical episode, the recording is obscured by movement, or several event types are combined under one label. Overinterpretation of a single movement, an uninformative routine EEG, or incidental EEG changes can lead to an incorrect explanation in either direction.
Bias can also enter the process. A psychiatric history may prematurely direct attention toward functional seizures; established epilepsy may cause a clinician to attribute every later episode to epilepsy. Patients deserve an assessment that tests both possibilities as needed. The two conditions also carry different medication implications: mislabeling functional events as epilepsy can expose patients to inappropriate antiseizure drugs, while missing epilepsy can delay essential seizure management.
A clinically responsible report should specify what was observed; whether a habitual event was captured; whether the EEG during that event was interpretable; which event type was classified; what degree of certainty was reached; and whether another diagnosis remains under consideration. The ILAE staged diagnostic framework describes possible, probable, clinically established, and documented levels for PNES.
Tests used selectively beyond EEG
ECG is important when loss of consciousness could have a cardiac explanation. Cardiac monitoring, orthostatic vital signs, or tilt-table assessment can be considered according to the history. Laboratory tests may help identify hypoglycemia, electrolyte disturbances, infection, pregnancy-related complications, or toxic exposures when clinically indicated. MRI or other imaging may be appropriate when neurological findings, the event pattern, or epilepsy assessment warrants it.
Serum prolactin, lactate, creatine kinase, and other proposed post-event biomarkers have substantial timing and specificity limitations and cannot independently distinguish all functional from epileptic seizures. They should never be used as stand-alone proof that a patient has PNES. Likewise, routine psychiatric questionnaires identify symptoms or possible treatment needs; they do not substitute for a seizure classification.
A medical workup is tailored to the presentation rather than an endless sequence of indiscriminate tests. Once a diagnosis is supported, the team should explain what evidence supports it and identify clear reasons for re-evaluation. New focal neurological symptoms, a new seizure pattern, a sustained change in consciousness, or additional medical red flags deserve fresh assessment even in someone with an existing functional diagnosis.
Diagnostic certainty, DSM-5-TR, and ICD-11
Functional seizures are commonly conceptualized within functional neurological disorder, termed functional neurological symptom disorder (conversion disorder) in DSM-5-TR language. Relevant classification descriptions emphasize clinical incompatibility or positive evidence in relation to recognized neurological disease patterns, interpreted after appropriate examination. DSM terminology and ICD-11 dissociative neurological symptom categories do not create a shortcut to diagnosis from symptoms alone.
Epileptic seizures are classified through neurological seizure taxonomies, including the ILAE's 2025 seizure classification. A diagnostic code or broad descriptive term cannot replace documented event history and differential diagnosis. Where a clinician's conclusion is provisional, the degree of certainty should be stated rather than presented as definitive.
How clinicians explain a diagnosis to the patient
A useful explanation names the actual diagnosis, relates it to the observed events, and describes why the available tests and features support the conclusion. For functional seizures, an explanation should acknowledge the involuntary nature and potential seriousness of attacks and describe available approaches to care. The language matters because stigmatizing or dismissive explanations damage trust and may interrupt treatment.
For epilepsy, the discussion includes seizure type, any known syndrome or cause, medication decisions, rescue plans when appropriate, and relevant safety restrictions. If the person has both conditions, the team can document separate event descriptions and safety instructions without implying that one type cancels the other.
The AAN guideline recommends specific diagnostic labeling, an explanation of the rationale, shared decision-making, continuity of care, and assessment for psychiatric comorbidity and epilepsy. Diagnostic communication is therefore part of clinical management, not an optional final step.
Treatment differs because the diagnosis differs
Epileptic seizures may require antiseizure medications chosen for the seizure type or epilepsy syndrome. Some patients benefit from surgery, neuromodulation, dietary therapy, or other specialist interventions when indicated. A medication plan depends on the person's precise diagnosis, risks, and treatment goals.
Functional seizures are managed through a clear explanation, ongoing neurological care when needed, individualized psychological treatment, attention to co-occurring conditions, and practical strategies for functioning and safety. Seizure-specific psychotherapy may help some patients. The 2026 AAN evidence review found psychological interventions possibly effective for improving seizure and quality-of-life outcomes, while recognizing limitations in study quality.
Evidence also shows why overstatement must be avoided. In the large CODES randomized trial, adding seizure-specific cognitive behavioral therapy to standardized medical care did not significantly improve the primary outcome of monthly seizure frequency at 12 months; several secondary measures, including psychosocial functioning and perceived improvement, favored the CBT group. Treatment expectations should reflect both the meaningful benefits and the uncertainty in outcomes.
Antiseizure medications and benzodiazepines are not indicated solely to suppress confirmed functional seizures in a patient without epilepsy or another medical indication. The AAN guideline recommends clinicians review and taper inappropriate antiseizure medications in that circumstance. A patient should never stop, reduce, or substitute prescribed medication independently: withdrawal can be dangerous, and an incomplete assessment may have missed coexisting epilepsy. Medication changes require the treating clinician's plan and follow-up.
What changes when both diagnoses are confirmed?
The care plan must address two conditions. An epilepsy specialist manages epileptic events, antiseizure therapy, and any rescue-medication instructions. A clinician experienced in functional seizures coordinates diagnostic explanation, psychological treatment where appropriate, management of other FND symptoms, and rehabilitation or social support as needed.
Written descriptions of each recognizable event type can help patients, families, and emergency staff respond appropriately. If events cannot reliably be classified outside the hospital, safety decisions should err toward medical evaluation of a potentially dangerous epileptic seizure. Caregivers should not improvise a diagnosis in the middle of an event based on one sign such as eye closure.
Follow-up is essential. Treatment goals may include reduced attack frequency, improved safety, fewer emergency visits, better sleep and functioning, psychological well-being, restored school or work participation, and appropriate medication use. Improvement in one type of seizure does not automatically indicate control of the other.
Children and adolescents: developmental considerations
A child with seizure-like events requires an age-appropriate assessment incorporating caregivers, school context, sleep, developmental history, pediatric neurological disorders, and the child's own account. Epileptic seizures and functional events can present differently across ages. Some pediatric events that look dramatic are benign nonepileptic phenomena, while others require urgent attention.
A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of pediatric event semiology reported age-related differences in signs that may support clinical differentiation, while retaining video-EEG as the diagnostic reference standard. Findings from adult monitoring populations should not automatically be transferred to children without developmental context.
Where functional seizures are confirmed, family-focused explanation, coordination with school staff, reducing avoidable disruption to education, and assessment of comorbid concerns may form part of care. Parents and teachers should avoid suggesting that an event is a choice or a disciplinary problem. Safeguarding and ordinary medical evaluation remain necessary if new symptoms or potential risks arise.
Practical safety during a seizure-like episode
Before the seizure type is known, prioritize physical safety. Stay with the person, time the episode, clear nearby hazards, cushion the head if needed, and gently place the person on their side when safe and appropriate. Do not restrain movements, force the mouth open, place objects in the mouth, or give food, drink, or oral medication while consciousness is impaired.
Call local emergency services for an event lasting more than five minutes, repeated events without recovery, trouble breathing or waking, significant injury, an event in water, a first-ever seizure, or when the person is pregnant or has diabetes and loses consciousness. Follow any individualized emergency plan supplied by the treating team. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's seizure first-aid guidance provides the general safety principles; outside the United States, use the local emergency number.
A previously confirmed functional seizure disorder does not make an unfamiliar prolonged or altered episode automatically harmless. Especially when the event differs from the person's usual presentation, urgent clinicians must consider epilepsy and other acute medical problems. If possible, a witness can note onset, movements, breathing, duration, and recovery for later assessment, but rescue takes precedence over recording.
Driving, swimming, working, and daily life
Loss of responsiveness or sudden impaired control creates safety risks whatever the event mechanism. Driving fitness and reporting requirements differ by jurisdiction and by the person's established diagnosis, event control, and individual risks. Patients should discuss local legal requirements with their clinician and licensing authority. A general web article cannot determine driving eligibility.
Swimming alone, bathing without precautions, climbing, working at heights, operating dangerous machinery, and childcare tasks involving water or traffic may require individualized risk planning while events remain unpredictable. These decisions should be collaborative and revisited as the clinical course becomes clearer, rather than imposed through assumptions that every functional event has the same severity.
An event diary can track circumstances, duration, recovery, and distinct spell types without intensive body monitoring that increases distress. A diagnosis also affects relationships and employment: clear explanations and practical accommodations can reduce stigma and restore confidence. Improving daily functioning is a legitimate treatment outcome even while some episodes persist.
Questions to ask a neurologist or epilepsy specialist
Useful questions include: Which of my usual events have you personally reviewed? Did the video-EEG capture my typical episode, and what did the EEG show during it? Could a focal epileptic seizure have an inconspicuous scalp EEG pattern in my case? Have we considered fainting or cardiac causes? Do I have more than one kind of event? What is the diagnostic certainty for each type? What should my family do during a prolonged episode? Which medications remain medically necessary? When would we repeat assessment?
These questions invite a precise, shared explanation and help keep care continuous. They are particularly important when the record uses an old term such as PNES, dissociative seizures, nonepileptic attack disorder, or conversion disorder without explaining the event-specific evidence.
Frequently asked questions
Can a functional seizure look exactly like epilepsy?
Sometimes the outward appearance overlaps so closely that a witness cannot classify the event. Convulsions, staring, collapse, and reduced responsiveness may occur in both. Expert assessment integrates the episode's time course, characteristic features, history, and sometimes synchronized video-EEG to identify the mechanism. Appearance alone is not a diagnosis.
Is a normal EEG proof that seizures are functional?
No. A normal EEG between events does not exclude epilepsy, and even an event-time scalp recording requires expert interpretation. The clinician also checks whether the test captured a typical episode and whether a suspected seizure type could lack a clear surface EEG correlate. NICE NG217 specifically states that EEG should not be used to exclude epilepsy.
Can somebody have PNES and epilepsy at the same time?
Yes. Both can occur in the same person, sometimes with distinct habitual event patterns. An established diagnosis of either one does not rule out the other, and careful follow-up may be needed when new event types emerge. A systematic review documents the overlap in specialty populations.
Are functional seizures voluntary or faked?
Functional seizures are involuntary clinical events. A diagnosis should be based on positive clinical evidence and appropriate differential assessment. Intentional symptom production or deception cannot be inferred merely from unusual movements, stress associations, an inconclusive EEG, or the existence of psychological symptoms.
Does trauma have to be present for a functional seizure diagnosis?
No. Trauma, stress, dissociation, and psychiatric symptoms may be clinically relevant in some people, but no particular experience is required to establish functional seizures. The diagnostic task is to identify the seizure mechanism and assess contributing concerns individually, rather than infer a universal cause from one event.
Is a phone video useful to a doctor?
A safely obtained recording of a typical event may provide valuable information about its sequence and appearance. A 2023 systematic review found that video-based differentiation can be informative in trained hands, although expertise and video quality affect accuracy. A recording does not replace medical examination or indicated EEG, and bystanders should prioritize safety.
What if I have two different kinds of spells?
Describe each type separately, including its onset, duration, movement, level of responsiveness, and recovery. The clinician may need to review more than one habitual event type rather than generalize from a single recorded spell. Coexisting epilepsy, functional seizures, syncope, and other conditions can produce differing episodes.
Should I stop antiseizure medication if functional seizures are diagnosed?
Do not change prescribed drugs yourself. Clinicians may recommend supervised tapering when functional seizures are confirmed and there is no epilepsy or other indication, as described in the 2026 AAN guideline. Coexisting epilepsy, withdrawal risks, and the reasons a drug was prescribed must be assessed before any change.
Which test is the gold standard?
Recording a person's typical event with synchronized video and EEG is the reference approach for high-certainty differentiation in appropriate cases. Its interpretation depends on capture of the correct event, quality of recording, and clinical context. The ILAE also recognizes staged diagnostic certainty when video-EEG is unavailable.
When does a seizure-like event require emergency help?
Seek emergency assistance for a first-ever event, an event exceeding five minutes, repeated events without recovery, injury, trouble breathing, an event in water, or other major safety concerns. Follow an existing individualized seizure action plan when applicable. CDC first aid provides additional practical detail.
Related Articles
For a distinct diagnostic comparison involving anxiety, read Panic Attack vs Seizure: Symptoms, Awareness, and Medical Assessment. The EN-14 functional seizures overview, functional seizures treatment guide, and functional neurological disorder articles are reserved as future internal-link targets in the cluster registry; their URLs will be linked after their actual English publication.
References
American Academy of Neurology. (2026). Management of functional seizures practice guideline executive summary. Neurology, 106(1), e214466. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000214466
Beniczky, S., Trinka, E., Wirrell, E., et al. (2025). Updated classification of epileptic seizures: Position paper of the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18338
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). First aid for seizures. https://www.cdc.gov/epilepsy/first-aid-for-seizures/
Goldstein, L. H., et al. (2020). Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): A pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32445688/
Kutlubaev, M. A., Xu, Y., Hackett, M. L., & Stone, J. (2018). Dual diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of frequency, correlates, and outcomes. Epilepsy & Behavior, 89, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.10.010
LaFrance, W. C., Jr., Baker, G. A., Duncan, R., Goldstein, L. H., & Reuber, M. (2013). Minimum requirements for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A staged approach. Epilepsia, 54(11), 2005–2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12356
Muthusamy, S., Seneviratne, U., Ding, C., & Phan, T. G. (2022). Using semiology to classify epileptic seizures vs psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: A meta-analysis. Neurology: Clinical Practice, 12(3), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001170
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2022; living guideline). Epilepsies in children, young people and adults: Diagnosis and assessment, NG217. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng217/chapter/diagnosis-and-assessment-of-epilepsy
Semiological features of epilepsy seizures and paroxysmal non-epileptic events in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026). Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42298738/
Use of video alone for differentiation of epileptic seizures from non-epileptic spells: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2023). Seizure. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37406461/
Utility and limitations of homemade videos in differentiating functional seizures from other paroxysmal events: An Italian cohort study. (2025). Epilepsia Open. https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70050