Fear of Medical Procedures: Specific Phobia, Trauma, and Healthcare Avoidance
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 1, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Fear of medical procedures is an umbrella description for fear, anxiety, disgust, panic-like reactions, fainting concerns, or avoidance connected with examinations, injections, blood draws, imaging, surgery, dentistry, anesthesia, hospitalization, or other healthcare procedures. The experience can be entirely understandable and temporary, especially when a procedure is painful, uncertain, invasive, or new. In some people, however, the fear becomes persistent, disproportionate to the actual danger, and strong enough to produce marked avoidance or impairment. When that pattern meets full diagnostic requirements, it may be classified as Specific Phobia.
The same surface behavior can arise for different reasons. One person may fear a needle because of pain; another may faint around blood; another may fear anesthesia because of a previous frightening medical event; another may postpone care because of cost, mistrust, prior discrimination, sensory overload, or practical barriers. A useful clinical formulation therefore asks what is feared, what the person predicts will happen, what they avoid, what physiological pattern occurs, and whether another diagnosis or medical issue better explains the response. The National Institute of Mental Health describes specific phobia as intense fear that is out of proportion to the actual danger and is associated with active avoidance or intense anxiety when the cue is encountered.
This article focuses on the broad fear-of-medical-procedures intent. Needle-specific fear, blood-injection-injury patterns, fear of blood, and dental fear have narrower clinical and search meanings. They are related, but they should not be collapsed into a single diagnosis or treated as interchangeable.
What Is Fear of Medical Procedures?
Fear of medical procedures can involve anticipatory worry before an appointment, fear during the procedure itself, or avoidance that begins long before a clinician is encountered. The feared outcome may be pain, loss of control, fainting, bad news, bodily injury, vomiting, suffocation, anesthesia complications, exposure of the body, sensory overload, being unable to escape, or repetition of an earlier frightening experience. The emotional response may include fear, disgust, shame, helplessness, anger, or combinations of these reactions.
There is no single DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnosis called “fear of medical procedures.” The diagnostic question depends on the pattern. A circumscribed, persistent fear of a medical cue can map to Specific Phobia when the full threshold is met. A fear centered on blood, injections, or injury may fall within a blood-injection-injury presentation. A fear linked to a qualifying traumatic medical event may require assessment for PTSD or another trauma-related condition. Some people have significant procedure anxiety without meeting criteria for any mental disorder. The World Health Organization’s ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements provide the current international framework for differentiating anxiety or fear-related disorders from other mental and behavioral conditions.
Normal fear, procedure anxiety, and clinical disorder
Fear before a biopsy, surgery, MRI, dental procedure, blood draw, or unfamiliar examination is not by itself evidence of a disorder. Fear can be an adaptive response to uncertainty, anticipated pain, or a real medical risk. Clinical significance emerges from the whole pattern: persistence, intensity relative to the actual threat, immediate fear when the cue is encountered or anticipated, avoidance or endurance with marked distress, and meaningful interference with health, work, education, relationships, or daily functioning.
The threshold matters because a label changes the explanatory frame. A person who dislikes injections but receives needed care is not automatically needle-phobic. A person who postponed one elective procedure after hearing about a complication is not automatically experiencing a phobia. Conversely, someone who repeatedly avoids necessary care, experiences intense cue-bound fear, and has carried the pattern for months or years may warrant formal assessment. For a broader discussion of how clinicians evaluate symptoms, context, impairment, and alternatives, see How Is Anxiety Diagnosed? Assessment, History, and Differential Diagnosis.
Is Fear of Medical Procedures a Specific Phobia?
Sometimes. Specific Phobia is the clearest diagnostic mapping when the fear is focused on a particular medical object or situation, occurs reliably around that cue, leads to avoidance or marked distress, is excessive relative to the actual danger and sociocultural context, persists, and causes clinically significant impairment. Medical fears may involve needles, blood, invasive procedures, scanners, surgical settings, or other specific cues. The formal diagnosis is Specific Phobia rather than a separate diagnosis named for every feared procedure.
The distinction is particularly important for search terms that sound diagnostic. “Tomophobia” is commonly used for fear of surgery or invasive medical procedures, “iatrophobia” for fear of doctors or medical care, and “nosocomephobia” for fear of hospitals. These labels can be useful descriptive shorthand, but they are not independent DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 disorders. A clinician maps the actual symptom pattern to the appropriate recognized diagnosis, if any, rather than diagnosing from the Greek-derived name alone.
The cluster’s dedicated diagnostic pages explain the formal boundaries in more detail: Specific Phobia DSM-5-TR Criteria Explained and Specific Phobia ICD-11 Diagnostic Requirements Explained. Symptoms such as fear, avoidance, panic-like arousal, and impairment are covered separately in Specific Phobia Symptoms: Fear, Avoidance, Panic, and Impairment.
Medical-Procedure Fear Is Not the Same as Medical Trauma or PTSD
A frightening medical experience can shape later fear without producing PTSD. The word “trauma” is often used conversationally for experiences that were painful, frightening, humiliating, or overwhelming. In formal PTSD diagnosis, however, the exposure requirement is narrower and must be followed by a characteristic constellation of intrusion, avoidance, negative changes in cognition and mood, and arousal/reactivity symptoms, with duration and impairment requirements. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs National Center for PTSD summarizes these DSM criteria and the required trauma exposure framework.
Medical events can qualify as traumatic exposures in some circumstances, and PTSD has been documented after serious illness, emergency care, invasive treatment, intensive care, and other medical events. Yet prevalence differs markedly across medical populations and study methods. A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis of 292 studies found substantial heterogeneity in PTSD prevalence across medical contexts. A 2026 review of medically induced PTSD describes the field as important but still underrecognized and underresearched. These findings support careful assessment; they do not justify assuming that every painful procedure is a qualifying trauma or that every later fear response is PTSD.
A practical diagnostic distinction
In a predominantly phobic pattern, fear is organized around a present or anticipated cue: the needle, scanner, operating room, blood draw, procedure, or other medical situation. Avoidance is often designed to prevent encountering that cue or the feared outcome associated with it. In a trauma-related pattern, the clinical picture may include unwanted memories, nightmares, physiological reactivity to reminders of the event, trauma-linked avoidance, persistent changes in beliefs or mood, hypervigilance, exaggerated startle, or other PTSD symptoms extending beyond the immediate procedure cue.
The distinction affects treatment. Exposure therapy for Specific Phobia is designed around safe contact with the feared cue and testing feared predictions. PTSD treatment is organized around a qualifying traumatic event and the broader trauma symptom network. Current VA/DoD guidance recommends trauma-focused psychotherapies such as Prolonged Exposure, Cognitive Processing Therapy, and EMDR for PTSD. A person with both a specific procedure phobia and PTSD may need an integrated or sequenced plan rather than having one diagnosis used as a substitute for the other.
How Fear Can Turn Into Healthcare Avoidance
Avoidance can be obvious, such as canceling a scan or refusing a blood draw, or subtle, such as delaying scheduling, repeatedly seeking reassurance without completing the procedure, choosing less appropriate care solely to avoid a feared cue, leaving a waiting room, or missing follow-up. In the short term, avoidance often reduces fear. That immediate relief can reinforce the behavior, making future contact with the feared situation feel even harder. The general learning process is explained in Anxiety and Avoidance: How Avoidance Maintains Fear.
Healthcare avoidance has many causes, and phobia is only one. In a U.S. national qualitative study, people described affective concerns and unfavorable evaluations of care, low perceived need, and traditional barriers such as cost, insurance, and time. That matters clinically: a person who misses care because they cannot afford it, cannot obtain transportation, have been mistreated, need disability accommodations, or reasonably distrust a particular setting should not have those barriers reframed as irrational fear.
When fear is a major driver, repeated delay can have health consequences by postponing preventive care, diagnostic testing, monitoring, vaccination, dental treatment, or treatment of an existing condition. Needle fear is one well-studied example. A systematic review and meta-analysis found needle fear common across age groups and documented avoidance of vaccination and other needle-related care in some populations. The clinical goal is therefore not simply to make a person feel calmer. It is to help them receive needed care while reducing unnecessary suffering and avoidance.
Common Triggers and Feared Outcomes
Needles, injections, blood draws, and IVs
Needles can combine several fear systems at once: anticipated pain, visual cues, loss of control, previous difficult procedures, fear of fainting, fear of blood, and fear of what a test or injection represents. Needle fear deserves its own formulation because some people have a classic blood-injection-injury pattern and others do not. For the needle-specific intent, see Needle Phobia: Fear of Injections, Vaccines, Blood Tests, and Treatment.
Blood, injury, and fainting
Some people become lightheaded or faint in the presence of blood, injury, injections, or invasive procedures. This is clinically important because it changes procedural planning and can be confused with ordinary panic physiology. The traditional account emphasizes a vasovagal response, but the physiology is more variable than a single universal two-phase model. A psychophysiological review by Ritz and colleagues found the blood-injection-injury response more complex and heterogeneous than the classic model implies. Recurrent or unexplained fainting also has medical causes and should not be attributed to anxiety by symptom matching alone.
The broader blood-injection-injury pattern is covered in Blood-Injection-Injury Phobia: Symptoms, Fainting, and Treatment, while fear focused specifically on blood is covered in Hemophobia: Fear of Blood, Fainting, and Treatment. These pages retain their own diagnostic and treatment boundaries.
Surgery, anesthesia, and invasive procedures
Fear before surgery can concern pain, anesthesia, awareness, complications, permanent bodily change, loss of autonomy, death, or prior medical trauma. Because surgery has real risks, not every concern is disproportionate. A useful assessment separates realistic risk appraisal from catastrophic overestimation and identifies whether avoidance is preventing medically indicated treatment. “Tomophobia” is a descriptive term sometimes used for intense fear of surgery or invasive treatment; the diagnosis still depends on the recognized clinical pattern rather than the label.
MRI, CT, enclosed equipment, and immobilization
Imaging procedures can trigger fear through confinement, noise, inability to move, sensory intensity, or anticipation of bad results. In some people the dominant mechanism is a focused situational phobia; in others it overlaps with claustrophobic fear, panic vulnerability, trauma reminders, pain, or sensory sensitivities. The plan should target the mechanism actually present rather than assuming that all scan anxiety is the same condition.
Dentistry and oral procedures
Dental fear can involve pain, needles, choking sensations, sounds, smells, gagging, loss of control, embarrassment, or earlier negative experiences. It is related to broader medical-procedure fear but has its own evidence base and treatment setting. Dental Phobia: Fear of Dentists, Avoidance, and Treatment is reserved as a separate English Hub owner for that narrower intent.
Examinations, screening, and fear of results
Some people fear the procedure; others fear what it might reveal. If the main problem is persistent preoccupation with having or acquiring a serious illness, repeated checking or reassurance seeking, or misinterpretation of bodily sensations, a clinician may consider illness-anxiety or related processes rather than Specific Phobia. If the fear is primarily about the procedure itself, a phobic formulation may fit better. The two can coexist.
What Medical-Procedure Fear Can Feel Like
Anticipatory symptoms can begin hours, days, or weeks before an appointment. People may notice intrusive images of the procedure, repetitive worry, difficulty sleeping, muscle tension, nausea, shakiness, sweating, a racing heart, shortness of breath, dizziness, urgency to escape, or a sense of impending catastrophe. At the procedure itself, fear may rise rapidly and can resemble a panic attack. A panic attack is a symptom episode; it does not by itself establish Panic Disorder.
Behavioral signs can be more diagnostically informative than raw symptom intensity. Repeated cancellation, refusal, leaving the clinic, needing extensive reassurance, avoiding looking at medical information, or organizing life around preventing healthcare encounters can indicate a fear-maintenance cycle. At the same time, accommodations that enable needed care are not automatically maladaptive “safety behaviors.” A support person, disability accommodation, communication aid, or medically appropriate monitoring may be essential rather than something to remove.
Why Fear of Medical Procedures Develops
Direct learning from painful or frightening care
A difficult procedure can teach the nervous system that a particular cue predicts danger. The learning may be especially strong when pain was unexpected, the person felt trapped or ignored, repeated attempts were required, a complication occurred, or the person believed something catastrophic was happening. This does not mean the later fear is irrational in origin. The original learning may have been understandable even if the fear later generalizes beyond the actual risk.
Observational and informational learning
Fear can also develop without a single defining event. Watching another person react intensely, hearing repeated frightening stories, or encountering alarming information can shape expectations. General anxiety vulnerability, behavioral inhibition, family learning, pain sensitivity, disgust sensitivity, and previous healthcare experiences may all contribute. NIMH notes that both genetic and environmental factors are involved in the development of specific phobias.
Uncertainty, control, and predictability
Medical care places people in an unusual position: another person may touch the body, use equipment, deliver medication, or make decisions under uncertainty. Fear often intensifies when the person does not know what will happen next or believes they cannot pause the procedure. Clear explanations, consent, predictable steps, and a mutually agreed signal to pause can reduce situational distress and can also make therapeutic exposure more precise because the person is learning about the real procedure rather than an imagined version.
Pain and fear can reinforce one another
Pain is not merely a psychological interpretation, and reducing procedure fear does not erase the need for appropriate pain control. At the same time, threat expectation can amplify anticipatory distress and attention to pain. Good care therefore separates pain management from fear treatment while addressing both. The aim is neither forced endurance nor complete elimination of every uncomfortable sensation; it is safe, informed participation in needed care with proportionate distress.
Assessment: What a Clinician Needs to Clarify
Assessment begins with the feared cue and feared outcome. Is the person afraid of needles, blood, fainting, pain, anesthesia, bad results, contamination, enclosed equipment, loss of control, humiliation, vomiting, choking, bodily injury, or memories of a previous event? Does the fear occur only in medical contexts or in related settings as well? What does the person do to prevent the feared outcome, and what care has been delayed or avoided?
A clinician also asks about onset, duration, frequency, functional impact, panic attacks, syncope, trauma symptoms, other anxiety disorders, OCD symptoms, health anxiety, depression, substance use, neurodevelopmental or sensory factors, and relevant medical history. Screening questionnaires may quantify symptoms, but a score is not a diagnosis. Diagnosis requires clinical assessment of the pattern, differential diagnoses, impairment, and context.
Medical differential diagnosis still matters
Dizziness, fainting, palpitations, shortness of breath, chest discomfort, neurological symptoms, medication reactions, and other physical experiences can occur around anxiety, but symptom overlap does not establish anxiety as the cause. First-time, recurrent, unexplained, exertional, injury-producing, or otherwise concerning fainting deserves medical evaluation. New or severe chest pain, major breathing difficulty, neurological deficits, heavy bleeding, severe allergic symptoms, or rapidly worsening illness should be assessed as medical problems rather than presumed to be fear.
Treatment: What Evidence Supports
Exposure-based therapy for Specific Phobia
For a genuine Specific Phobia pattern, exposure-based treatment has the strongest evidence. Exposure is a structured, collaborative process of approaching safe feared cues and situations rather than continuing to avoid them. The person tests predictions, learns what actually happens, discovers that anxiety can be tolerated, and builds flexible behavior around the feared cue. A meta-analysis of 33 randomized studies found exposure-based psychological treatments produced large effects for Specific Phobia and outperformed no-treatment, placebo, and other active psychotherapies at post-treatment.
Exposure does not require a therapist to force someone into the most frightening procedure immediately. A hierarchy may begin with lower-intensity steps such as reading a neutral description, looking at equipment, entering a clinic, watching a demonstration, rehearsing the procedure, or completing parts of a real procedure under safe conditions. The exact sequence should reflect the person’s feared prediction and the medical context. The English Hub’s method page, Exposure Therapy for Specific Phobia: How It Works and What to Expect, explains hierarchy design, inhibitory learning, safety behaviors, and return of fear in detail.
A 2022 meta-analysis of single-session and multi-session in-vivo exposure found large improvements with both formats and no clear difference in pooled effectiveness, while single-session treatment used less total treatment time. This does not mean a single session is appropriate for every medical fear. Complex trauma, severe fainting, multiple comorbidities, developmental needs, or the need to coordinate with a medical team can require a broader plan.
Applied tension when fainting is part of the pattern
Applied tension is a technique intended to increase blood pressure through repeated large-muscle tension and is often taught to people with blood-injection-injury fear who are prone to vasovagal fainting. It is not a universal procedure-anxiety technique. A critical review found some support for applied tension but also emphasized the small controlled evidence base and uncertainty about whether tension adds benefit beyond exposure itself. For a person with actual fainting episodes, a clinician should first understand the syncopal pattern and medical context rather than assuming a psychiatric cause.
Needle-specific exposure evidence
A clinical practice guideline based on systematic review evidence recommends exposure-based interventions for people with high levels of needle fear, including in-vivo exposure for older children and adults, while rating the underlying evidence as very low quality on average. This is a useful example of evidence hierarchy: a strong clinical recommendation can coexist with limited certainty in the trial base. Needle-specific protocols should not automatically be generalized to every type of medical-procedure fear.
When trauma-focused treatment is the better fit
If the central problem is PTSD after a qualifying medical trauma, treatment should follow PTSD evidence rather than simply applying a generic phobia protocol. Trauma-focused psychotherapy targets the traumatic memory, trauma-related beliefs, avoidance, and the broader symptom network. A clinician may still incorporate real-world medical reminders when appropriate, but the rationale and treatment plan differ from cue-focused Specific Phobia exposure.
Virtual reality: promising, not a universal solution
Virtual reality can be used for distraction during procedures or as a form of therapeutic exposure. A 2021 systematic review of 28 studies covering needle procedures, dental fear, scan-related claustrophobia, and burn care found that VR reduced fear in some settings, but the studies were heterogeneous and generally at substantial risk of bias, limiting firm conclusions. VR is therefore best described as a promising delivery tool whose role depends on the procedure, treatment goal, and quality of the underlying protocol.
Medication and procedural sedation
Medication can sometimes be used to reduce acute anxiety in selected medical situations, and procedural sedation may be medically appropriate for particular procedures. These are medical decisions with their own indications, contraindications, monitoring requirements, and aftercare. They are not interchangeable with psychotherapy for a persistent phobia. NIMH notes that medication may help phobia symptoms in specific circumstances, while psychotherapy is the primary treatment approach.
For some people, medication or sedation helps them complete urgently needed care while longer-term fear treatment proceeds separately. For others, a clinician may prefer behavioral treatment first. The decision belongs in shared medical decision-making, not in an online dosing recommendation. A person should also follow the procedural team’s instructions about fasting, transportation, driving, other medications, and monitoring whenever sedation or anxiolytic medication is used.
Procedure-Specific Support Can Make Treatment Possible
Fear treatment and humane medical care work best together. Patients can tell the healthcare team about the fear before the procedure, describe previous fainting or traumatic experiences, ask what sensations and steps to expect, identify which details are helpful or overwhelming, request reasonable accommodations, and agree on a pause signal when feasible. This creates predictability without promising that nothing uncomfortable will happen.
MedlinePlus advises people with medical-test anxiety to communicate their concerns with clinicians and provides practical coping guidance for tests and procedures. The goal of preparation is not to create a ritual that must be perfect before care can happen. It is to reduce avoidable uncertainty, make consent meaningful, and identify supports that increase the chance of completing necessary care.
A practical plan before an appointment
Before the appointment, identify the specific feared prediction in one sentence: “I think I will faint,” “I think I will lose control,” “I think the pain will be unbearable,” or “I think the procedure will recreate what happened before.” Then tell the care team the relevant history, including fainting, difficult access, prior complications, trauma triggers, or sensory needs. Ask which parts of the procedure are medically fixed and which can be adapted. This turns a vague fear into a concrete plan.
If avoidance has been severe, consider practicing smaller approach steps before the real procedure with a qualified therapist. If the procedure is urgent, treatment should not become a prerequisite that delays necessary care; the psychological and medical teams can instead work in parallel. Where a medical team offers options such as positioning, topical pain control, pacing, support persons, or sedation, the choice should be individualized to the procedure and patient rather than treated as a universal protocol.
Fear of Medical Procedures in Children and Adolescents
Children’s medical fear changes with development. Young children may have limited ability to understand why a painful procedure is necessary, while older children and adolescents may fear pain, loss of control, embarrassment, needles, bodily injury, or the meaning of the illness itself. Caregivers can either reduce or amplify threat depending on how they prepare, model coping, and respond to distress. A child’s resistance should not automatically be labeled a phobia.
Developmentally appropriate explanation, assent where appropriate, pain control, predictable steps, and caregiver coaching can be part of good procedural care. When fear is persistent and impairing, evidence-based exposure can be adapted to age and developmental level. The cluster reserves a separate child-focused Specific Phobia owner so that pediatric diagnosis and treatment are not reduced to adult protocols.
When Fear Should Not Delay Medical Care
Psychological treatment is valuable, but it should not be used as a reason to postpone urgent assessment. If symptoms suggest a potentially serious medical problem, the immediate task is medical evaluation. A person can tell emergency or urgent-care staff that they have severe procedure fear, panic, a fainting history, or trauma-related reactions while still receiving assessment.
The same principle applies to ongoing disease monitoring and preventive care. If fear repeatedly causes missed testing, vaccination, cancer screening, dental treatment, medication administration, or follow-up for a known condition, that functional impact is itself a reason to seek help. The aim is to build a path into care, not to wait for fear to disappear before care becomes possible.
Recovery and Prognosis
Medical-procedure fear can improve substantially. The most useful marker of recovery is not whether anxiety reaches zero. It is whether the person can make healthcare decisions based increasingly on medical need and personal values rather than on avoidance. Someone may still feel nervous before a procedure and nevertheless complete it, use proportionate support, and recover afterward without reorganizing life around the fear.
Progress can also be specific rather than global. A person may become comfortable with blood tests while still fearing surgery, or tolerate medical appointments while remaining vulnerable to trauma reminders in intensive-care settings. Treatment should therefore measure the actual target: approach behavior, completed care, distress tolerance, feared predictions, fainting risk when relevant, and functional impact.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the fear of medical procedures called?
There is no single official diagnosis with that name. “Tomophobia” is often used for fear of surgery or invasive procedures, “iatrophobia” for fear of doctors or medical care, and other named terms describe narrower fears. Clinically, a persistent, impairing, cue-specific pattern may be diagnosed as Specific Phobia when full criteria are met. The popular label alone does not establish a diagnosis.
Can fear of medical procedures be a specific phobia?
Yes. If the fear is focused on a particular medical cue or situation, is persistent and excessive relative to the actual danger, reliably provokes fear, leads to avoidance or intense endurance, and causes significant impairment, it can map to Specific Phobia. Normal apprehension before a difficult procedure does not meet that threshold automatically.
Can a bad medical experience cause PTSD?
It can, when the medical event meets the trauma-exposure requirement and the person develops the full PTSD symptom pattern. Many frightening, painful, or distressing medical experiences do not meet all PTSD criteria, and some lead instead to specific fear, adjustment difficulties, or no psychiatric disorder. A trauma-informed assessment should establish what happened and which symptoms followed.
Why do some people faint around needles or blood?
Blood, injection, and injury cues can trigger vasovagal responses in some people, producing lightheadedness or fainting. The response is not universal, and the physiology is more varied than a simple textbook pattern. First-time, recurrent, unexplained, or injury-producing fainting should receive medical assessment rather than being presumed to be anxiety.
Does exposure therapy mean being forced through a procedure?
No. Evidence-based exposure is collaborative and structured. It involves planned contact with safe feared cues and testing feared predictions, often in graded steps. Medical consent, genuine hazards, disability accommodations, pain control, and medically necessary precautions remain part of care. Coercion is not a therapeutic principle.
Can medication cure a medical-procedure phobia?
Medication may reduce acute symptoms in selected situations, and procedural sedation can be appropriate for some medical procedures, but neither should be described as a universal cure for a persistent phobia. Exposure-based psychotherapy has the strongest evidence for Specific Phobia. Medication decisions require an individual medical assessment.
What if I need a procedure soon and cannot finish therapy first?
Tell the medical team as early as possible, explain the specific fear and relevant history, and ask what procedural accommodations or medical options are available. Psychological support can occur in parallel with necessary care. Urgent or important treatment should not depend on first achieving complete emotional comfort.
Is healthcare avoidance always caused by anxiety?
No. People delay or avoid care for many reasons, including cost, access, time, previous mistreatment, disability barriers, low perceived need, cultural context, and distrust, as well as fear. Good assessment identifies the actual barriers instead of converting every missed appointment into a psychiatric symptom.
Related Articles
References
Ayala, E. S., Meuret, A. E., & Ritz, T. (2009). Treatments for blood-injury-injection phobia: A critical review of current evidence. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 43(15), 1235–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.04.008
Cyr, S., Guo, D. X., Marcil, M.-J., et al. (2021). Posttraumatic stress disorder prevalence in medical populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 69, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.01.010
El-Gabalawy, R., Stoycos, S. A., Schumann, N., O’Garo, K.-G. N., & McBain, S. (2026). Medical trauma in context: Recognizing and addressing medically induced posttraumatic stress disorder in adults. Journal of Traumatic Stress. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.70107
Kılıç, A., Brown, A., Aras, I., et al. (2021). Using virtual technology for fear of medical procedures: A systematic review of the effectiveness of virtual reality-based interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(11), 1062–1079. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab016
McLenon, J., & Rogers, M. A. M. (2019). The fear of needles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13818
McMurtry, C. M., Taddio, A., Noel, M., et al. (2016). Exposure-based interventions for the management of individuals with high levels of needle fear across the lifespan: A clinical practice guideline and call for further research. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 45(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2016.1157204
National Institute of Mental Health. (2025). Phobias and phobia-related disorders. NIMH
National Library of Medicine. (n.d.). How to cope with medical test anxiety. MedlinePlus. MedlinePlus
Odgers, K., Kershaw, K. A., Li, S. H., & Graham, B. M. (2022). The relative efficacy and efficiency of single- and multi-session exposure therapies for specific phobia: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 159, 104203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2022.104203
Ritz, T., Meuret, A. E., & Ayala, E. S. (2010). The psychophysiology of blood-injection-injury phobia: Looking beyond the diphasic response paradigm. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.05.007
Taber, J. M., Leyva, B., & Persoskie, A. (2015). Why do people avoid medical care? A qualitative study using national data. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(3), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3089-1
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD. (n.d.). Overview of psychotherapy for PTSD. National Center for PTSD
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for PTSD. (n.d.). PTSD and DSM-5. National Center for PTSD
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders (CDDR). WHO
Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Horowitz, J. D., Powers, M. B., & Telch, M. J. (2008). Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(6), 1021–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.007