Emotional Memory: How Feelings Shape What We Remember

3 days ago

18 min read

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Memory & Forgetting · Written by Artificial Sapiens

Emotional memories often feel unusually clear. You may recall receiving important news, a moment of intense happiness, an embarrassing mistake, or a frightening near miss long after ordinary details of the same day have faded. Research shows why: the emotional significance of an event can change what receives attention, how information is encoded, what is strengthened over time, and how a later act of remembering feels. The result can be better retention of selected information, together with gaps, changes in detail, and confidence that exceeds accuracy. Kensinger (2009) and Wardell and Palombo (2024) provide complementary reviews of this selective and reconstructive process.

Emotional memory is a broad scientific subject connecting cognitive psychology, affective science, and cognitive neuroscience. The central question is how feelings and emotional significance influence ordinary human memory processes. Questions about a particular psychiatric disorder, traumatic intrusion, or clinical treatment have their own evidence and diagnostic boundaries.

What Is Emotional Memory?

Emotional memory refers to the encoding, retention, and retrieval of experiences or information whose processing is influenced by emotion. Researchers use the expression for memories of emotional events, memories containing affective information, and learned associations between cues and emotionally significant outcomes. These phenomena overlap, but each can be measured separately. Emotional memory is a research domain, not a diagnosis or a separate all-purpose memory store.

The term includes two distinguishable questions. First, what does someone remember about an event that was exciting, joyful, frightening, sad, or surprising? Second, how can previously learned associations or emotional meanings change a response to something encountered again? An individual may remember what happened, retain the emotional meaning of the experience, and respond emotionally to a related cue with different degrees of explicit awareness. Phelps (2004) describes the interaction of partially distinct neural systems rather than a single emotional-memory center.

For example, a person might remember the exact words of a heartfelt compliment, recall mainly the feeling of pride, or simply feel encouraged when returning to the place where it occurred. These are different aspects of remembering. The label emotional memory should specify which aspect is under investigation.

The Essential Distinctions: Valence, Arousal, Relevance, and Mood

Emotional valence: positive and negative experience

Valence describes whether an experience is experienced as pleasant or unpleasant. Happiness, gratitude, admiration, fear, anger, disgust, and shame involve different motivational and cognitive patterns. A positive event and a negative event can both be memorable, but studies do not show a uniform rule that negative memories are always stronger. Different tasks favor different outcomes: recognition of objects, source memory, associations, autobiographical narratives, or later subjective vividness. Kensinger (2009) explains why valence matters beyond general emotional intensity.

Arousal: activation and urgency

Arousal is the degree of physiological and psychological activation associated with an experience. A calm sense of affection and an exhilarating celebration can both have positive valence while differing sharply in arousal. Likewise, uneasiness and acute panic differ in intensity. Arousal often increases priority for certain information, especially when that information is already distinctive or relevant. It does not reliably strengthen every element of the scene.

Personal relevance, goals, and appraisal

Emotional meaning depends on an individual's goals, history, expectations, culture, and understanding of the situation. A public announcement may deeply affect someone whose family is involved and barely register for another listener. Appraisal, the interpretation of what an event means, helps determine attention and later rehearsal. Researchers increasingly recommend measuring specific feelings and appraisals rather than treating every emotional experience as interchangeable. Wardell and Palombo (2024) emphasize the changing significance of autobiographical experiences over time.

Emotion during the event versus mood during remembering

The emotional state at encoding and the emotional state at retrieval are different variables. A distressing event may be recalled years later with relief, indifference, gratitude, or mixed feelings. Current mood can influence the accessibility and interpretation of past experiences, but it does not supply a perfect key that reconstructs an earlier memory. Mood-congruent recall, state-dependent retrieval, and the emotional meaning of an event should be evaluated separately.

How Emotions Shape Memory: Four Linked Processes

1. Attention: selecting the most important information

Emotional material can capture attention because it signals reward, danger, novelty, loss, or personal significance. Selective attention influences what enters memory in the first place. A person hearing alarming news may attend closely to the headline while missing who entered the room. Later, the emotional centerpiece seems exceptionally memorable, even though surrounding details were poorly encoded.

The arousal-biased competition framework proposes that arousal amplifies competition among representations, favoring information that already has high priority and disadvantageous to lower-priority information under some conditions. It is an influential explanatory model, with specific testable predictions, and should not be converted into a universal law that arousal always narrows attention. Mather and Sutherland (2011) set out this framework and summarize evidence and exceptions.

2. Encoding: building a representation of the event

Encoding transforms attended information into representations available for later remembering. An emotional episode may strengthen processing of salient objects, distinctive sensory features, meaningful interpretations, or associations. Which component benefits depends on goals, stimulus organization, valence, arousal, attention, and the eventual memory test.

A memorable graduation illustrates the process. A graduate may encode the moment of hearing their name, the sensation of walking onstage, and the meaning of the accomplishment. They may have far weaker memory for the order of other graduates. That unequal retention is an expected consequence of selective processing, not evidence that one section of memory was erased.

3. Consolidation: what becomes relatively durable

Consolidation refers to processes through which memory representations change and become more stable over time. Emotional arousal can influence these processes through interactions among the amygdala, hippocampal and other medial temporal regions, cortical systems, and neuromodulators including norepinephrine. The relationship is complex and depends on timing, the kind of learning, and physiological conditions.

Classic animal research and human imaging support a modulatory role for the amygdala, particularly in the consolidation of emotionally significant experiences. McGaugh's neuroscience review (2004) synthesizes the foundational evidence; Dolcos, LaBar, and Cabeza (2004) reported stronger amygdala–medial temporal interaction during successful encoding of emotional pictures. These findings establish important neural contributions without implying that one structure permanently stores every emotional memory.

4. Retrieval: what comes back and how it feels

Retrieval is a constructive act. Cues, current goals, recent conversations, emotional state, and existing knowledge influence which details are accessed and how they are assembled. Emotional memories may be retrieved more readily or experienced with stronger mental imagery and a greater feeling of reliving. However, later remembering can also change the remembered story. Kensinger and Ford (2020) review emotion's effects on retrieval as both an outcome and a process that shapes subsequent memory.

These four processes interact. Better retention of a central detail may originate in attention during the event, consolidation after it, repeated discussion later, or some combination. A single strong recollection cannot determine which mechanism occurred.

What Happens in the Brain During Emotional Remembering?

The amygdala

The amygdala comprises interconnected nuclei involved in detecting biologically and personally significant information, learning affective associations, and modulating other systems. It responds across a range of emotionally meaningful stimuli, not only fear. Its contribution to emotional memory includes influence on neural processing and consolidation. The common phrase that the amygdala stores emotions in a separate box is a misleading metaphor. Phelps (2004) and McGaugh (2004) explain complementary roles in human and animal research.

The hippocampus and medial temporal memory systems

The hippocampus is important for relational and episodic representations: links among events, people, places, and temporal contexts. Emotional remembering frequently requires coordination between the hippocampus and amygdala. A strong emotional response can be retained alongside imperfect information about where or when the event occurred. In neuroimaging, activity in these systems is associated with later memory, but such associations do not reveal the precise subjective experience of an individual episode. Dolcos and colleagues (2004) provide an influential human study.

Prefrontal and sensory regions

Prefrontal systems contribute to attention control, goals, interpretation, regulation, and strategic retrieval. Sensory regions participate in representing visual and other perceptual details. During retrieval, these systems interact according to what the person is trying to remember and what information is available. Contemporary accounts describe distributed memory networks, so claims that a remembered feeling has a single fixed physical address are too simple.

Stress chemistry and biological timing

Adrenaline-related peripheral responses, noradrenergic signaling, and glucocorticoid activity can affect memory at different stages. Timing and intensity are important. Stress experienced during encoding, just after learning, or immediately before retrieval can produce different findings. The effect of a stressful event cannot be predicted from its emotional intensity alone, and a laboratory manipulation of stress hormones should never be treated as a personal memory test.

Why Emotional Events Are Often Easier to Remember

Emotion can change the significance assigned to information. Personally meaningful events are more likely to receive selective attention, become distinctive in the individual's story, elicit later conversation, and be revisited in imagination. These repeated encounters can provide additional retrieval opportunities. An emotional event may therefore persist because several processes support access to it at different times.

A revealing distinction is between memory for an emotional item and memory for its background. Many studies find an advantage for a salient emotional element accompanied by weaker memory for less significant context. This pattern is sometimes called the emotion-induced memory trade-off. Its size and direction depend on the material, the task, and the participant. Kensinger (2009) reviews when selective enhancement occurs; Waring and Kensinger (2009) test age-related differences in the trade-off.

Imagine witnessing an argument at a restaurant. You may remember a sharply delivered sentence and the speaker's expression while misremembering the color of the walls, a nearby table, or which employee approached first. These differences do not allow a researcher to infer that central content is necessarily accurate. Both central and peripheral details must be tested against independently available information.

Vividness, Confidence, Consistency, and Accuracy

The felt quality of remembering must be separated from measurable memory performance. Vividness is how detailed and image-like a recollection seems. Confidence is how strongly the person believes the recollection. Consistency concerns whether descriptions remain similar across interviews or occasions. Accuracy concerns correspondence with what actually happened, determined where independent evidence permits.

Emotional remembering can increase vividness and confidence more reliably than it increases accuracy of all details. In one classic longitudinal investigation conducted after September 11, 2001, participants' memory reports for the moment they heard the news changed over time, while confidence and vividness remained relatively high. Ordinary comparison memories showed a different trajectory of subjective certainty. Talarico and Rubin (2003) provide the study, and Frinco and colleagues (2024) review a wider longitudinal literature.

This distinction matters for personal disagreements, family stories, news events, and eyewitness testimony. Someone can sincerely remember an emotionally charged experience and still misplace an incidental detail. A strong emotional reaction is evidence about the person's present experience; determining the exact historical sequence is a separate evidentiary question.

Does Negative Emotion Improve Memory More Than Positive Emotion?

Fear, anger, sadness, excitement, pride, and happiness cannot be placed along a single scale of memory strength. Some experiments have found that negative material preferentially preserves particular sensory details, while positive material sometimes supports more conceptual or general processing. Effects vary with arousal, memory instructions, stimulus familiarity, delay, and whether the test concerns individual items, contextual associations, or gist. Kensinger's review (2009) describes the experimental patterns and their limits.

A joyful wedding, a difficult conversation, a surprise award, and a frightening accident can all remain prominent in autobiographical memory for very different reasons. Rehearsal, personal importance, and later interpretation add to the effects of original emotion. Emotional valence alone is an inadequate explanation of which memories a person retains for years.

Emotional Memory and the Difference Between Gist and Detail

Gist is the general meaning of an event: what happened and why it mattered. Specific detail concerns words, order, time, location, color, exact identity, or other contextual information. People may retain the gist of emotional episodes despite uncertainty about precise details. In other circumstances, a striking perceptual fragment survives while the chronology fades.

A person might correctly remember that an interview ended in disappointment, while mistakenly remembering which question prompted the strongest emotion. Another person might accurately remember a particular facial expression while drawing an incorrect conclusion about the other person's intentions. Memory for perception and inference should be distinguished. A recollection can be psychologically meaningful without making every inferred motive historically certain.

The distinction is especially important when considering media coverage of major events. Repeated exposure can strengthen shared public knowledge but also alter where people think their knowledge originated. The current overview addresses general mechanisms; the separate research territories on false memories, misinformation, source monitoring, and eyewitness memory examine their specialized tests and implications.

Emotional Memories Change Over Time

A remembered episode may remain accessible while its details, meaning, and emotional tone change. New information can become linked to the experience. Repeated retelling can stabilize some elements and introduce interpretations that were absent when the event took place. A memory of an initially humiliating experience might later become a story about resilience; the event's present significance can therefore differ from its original significance.

A 2024 review in Nature Reviews Psychology synthesizes evidence on stability and malleability in emotional autobiographical memory. The review treats persistence and change as coexisting properties. Strong feelings and a durable personal narrative can accompany modification in specific remembered content. Emotional memory should be understood as an evolving representation embedded in a person's life, relationships, and subsequent knowledge.

These observations also establish a methodological limit: researchers cannot infer the accuracy of someone's private childhood episode simply from how consistently it is told. Verification requires independent corroboration where available, careful attention to the circumstances of recall, and clear distinctions between a report, an interpretation, and an external record.

Emotional Memories and Autobiographical Identity

Autobiographical memories connect personal experiences with a sense of continuity across time. Emotion helps determine which experiences become landmarks in a life story. A graduation, move, reunion, bereavement, public success, or relationship turning point can organize later narratives about identity. The same event may acquire different significance as a person changes their priorities or understands more about the circumstances.

The scientific concept of autobiographical memory concerns the wider organization and reconstruction of personal experience. The present article focuses on how emotion modulates remembering across systems. Episodic memory provides the broader framework for remembering individual experiences in context. Those concepts overlap because an emotionally meaningful event can also be episodic and autobiographical.

Learned Emotional Associations and Explicit Memories

An emotional association can influence behavior without a clear narrative recollection. A familiar sound associated with good news may evoke excitement; a location associated with an unpleasant episode may provoke apprehension. Learning mechanisms can associate cues with outcomes, and their operation is partly dissociable from conscious recollection of a particular event.

This distinction does not show that every unexplained emotion is evidence of an inaccessible forgotten event. Similar feelings may arise through many routes: current expectations, bodily states, learned habits, environmental cues, interpersonal context, or other psychological processes. Research on emotional learning investigates causal patterns under controlled conditions; a single response in daily life rarely identifies its unique origin.

Emotion, Sleep, and Later Retention

Sleep supports multiple aspects of learning and memory, but the specific proposal that sleep always preserves emotional memories better than neutral memories has mixed support. A 2019 meta-analysis of 31 studies reported no overall preferential sleep-dependent consolidation advantage for emotional versus neutral material under its inclusion and analysis criteria. A 2024 review of sleep and emotional memory likewise emphasizes differences across methods and outcomes.

Sleep duration, sleep continuity, memory task, emotional material, and testing delay can affect results. These complexities belong to the distinct sleep-memory evidence base. For a dedicated overview of sleep-dependent memory processes, see Sleep and Memory: Consolidation, Learning, and Sleep Loss. No precise sleep stage can be prescribed as a universal way to permanently secure a cherished emotional memory.

How Emotion Interacts With Forgetting and Retrieval

Emotion does not suspend forgetting. Even highly meaningful episodes lose accessible details over time. Some components can resist forgetting better than others; repeated discussions and reminders may keep the event prominent while changing what is reported. Reduced accessibility can result from limited original encoding, competition among related memories, missing retrieval cues, or later reconstruction.

Remembering can also be cued unexpectedly. A song may bring back a family gathering, and an unfamiliar smell may evoke a forgotten visit. The cue may be highly effective for that individual because of learned associations and personal history. This is a phenomenon of ordinary retrieval, not proof that an intact sensory recording was stored for decades. The broader processes are explained in Memory Retrieval: Recall, Recognition, and Cues and Memory Consolidation: How Memories Become Stable.

Flashbulb Memories and Public Events

Flashbulb memory describes an often vivid autobiographical memory of the circumstances in which a person learned about a surprising and consequential event. The label originated in a photographic analogy, yet research challenges the notion of uniquely exact mental snapshots. People may retain very high confidence even as details of their original reports change.

A 2024 review of 57 longitudinal studies and a 2025 review of flashbulb memories discuss the roles of social context, emotion, public discussion, and methodological differences. Because flashbulb memories constitute a distinctive research question, this article treats them as one manifestation of emotional remembering rather than attempting to replace the dedicated flashbulb-memory article planned elsewhere in EN-24.

Emotional Memory, Suggestibility, and False Recollection

Emotional significance does not guarantee protection against misinformation. Research finds that the effects of emotion on false recollection differ according to whether investigators use word lists, pictures, autobiographical suggestions, recall, or recognition; the design of the experiment matters. Yin, Zhou, and Li (2024) review contradictory findings and explain why it is misleading to declare that negative emotion always increases or always reduces false memory.

If friends later discuss an emotionally charged evening, a participant might incorporate someone else's description into their own account or become more certain of an already familiar detail. These outcomes are possibilities studied with controlled procedures, not grounds for assuming any individual recollection is false. The dedicated False Memories: How They Form and What Research Shows article addresses experimental paradigms and the conditions under which memory reports depart from documented events.

Individual Differences, Development, and Aging

Emotional memory is shaped by previous experience, attentional priorities, motivation, and cognitive resources. People differ in how strongly they react to a scene, which details they notice, how often they rehearse it, and how they respond to later cues. Average effects found in an experimental sample should not be treated as a fixed personality type or a reliable description of an individual person's memory.

Across adult aging, research has examined a possible positivity effect: older adults, under some conditions, show relatively greater preference for positive over negative information. A meta-analysis of 100 studies found an age-related positivity effect moderated by methodological and sample characteristics. A close replication found the effect under full attention but not divided attention in that specific task. The finding describes a pattern of selective processing, not a guarantee that older adults remember only happy experiences.

Age can also affect associative and contextual memory differently from memory for emotional items. Waring and Kensinger (2009) demonstrate how scene components and arousal must be separated. Normal variation in remembering emotionally meaningful events should not be interpreted as evidence of dementia, posttraumatic stress disorder, dissociative amnesia, or another condition.

How Emotional Memory Is Studied

Researchers use recognition tasks, free recall, cued recall, delayed tests, autobiographical diaries, longitudinal interviews, physiological measures, and brain imaging. Each measures different aspects of emotion–memory interaction. A laboratory picture study offers experimental control but limited ecological richness; a personal-life study offers relevance but introduces variation in rehearsal, interpretation, and verification.

A sound study distinguishes emotional valence from arousal; tests target versus background information separately; records delays between learning and testing; and clarifies whether the outcome is accuracy, confidence, vividness, consistency, source attribution, or overall recall. Measures of subjective intensity are scientifically useful, yet they cannot replace behavioral evidence about the historical content of a memory.

Neuroimaging identifies associations between patterns of activity and measured remembering. It does not read individual memories with complete accuracy, establish that a given remembered episode occurred, or show that emotional responses originate from one brain structure alone. Studies with lesions and pharmacological manipulations can offer complementary causal evidence, although translation from animals, clinical cases, and laboratory images to daily life remains constrained.

Common Misconceptions About Emotional Memory

Myth: Intense emotion preserves every detail

Emotion can prioritize some details while leaving others weakly encoded. Vividness and confidence are related to the experience of recall, and neither verifies the entire event. Kensinger (2009) and Talarico and Rubin (2003) document these distinctions.

Myth: The amygdala is a storage vault for feelings

The amygdala contributes to emotional learning and modulation of memory networks, interacting with the hippocampus, prefrontal areas, and other regions. Emotionally meaningful memories involve distributed activity. The metaphor of a sealed emotional storage compartment cannot represent the underlying science. Phelps (2004) reviews these neural interactions.

Myth: Negative memories are always more powerful

Negative and positive memories depend on different forms of significance, arousal, attention, and later rehearsal. Negative material can confer specific perceptual advantages in some tasks, but positive life events can remain highly vivid and accessible. There is no universal ranking of emotional states by memory strength.

Myth: A strong emotional reaction proves a hidden memory

Current feelings may be influenced by numerous past and present causes. An emotional reaction alone cannot authenticate a forgotten event or establish a particular diagnosis. Reliable interpretation requires the relevant behavioral, historical, and clinical context.

Myth: Repeated storytelling makes an event exact

Retelling can strengthen access to an account, but it can also preserve interpretations, omit material, and introduce later information. Repetition and confidence do not establish historical precision. Wardell and Palombo (2024) review memory malleability across time.

Practical Implications: Remembering What Matters

Emotion naturally marks experiences that matter to a person, but deliberately seeking very high stress is not a sound memory strategy. Learning is better served by attention, clear meaning, organization, and deliberate review than by trying to make every topic frightening or intensely exciting. For important instructions, use written records and opportunities to check understanding; emotional importance alone cannot guarantee complete recall.

When reflecting on an emotionally charged disagreement, separate what you directly observed from conclusions about another person's intention. If historical precision matters, consult contemporaneous records and independent accounts while remaining alert to the possibility that later discussion can affect recall. Where personal experience is the subject, consider both the meaning of the memory and the degree of certainty justified by evidence.

For educational or professional learning, connecting material to personally meaningful examples may help engagement, although engagement is not equivalent to demonstrated long-term transfer. Retrieval practice and distributed review have evidence bases that go beyond emotional intensity. The dedicated Human Memory: Types, Processes, and How It Works overview places these strategies within general memory science.

If emotionally charged recollections are causing serious distress or substantial disruption, a qualified clinician can assess the person's overall situation. Ordinary emotional remembering, unpleasant recollections, strong reactions to cues, and diagnostic symptoms are different matters. An online memory score or a vivid episode does not establish a clinical condition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is an example of emotional memory?

Remembering the moment you learned that you received a job offer, the facial expression of someone who welcomed you home, or a frightening near miss while traveling are everyday examples. What makes them emotional memories is the role of emotional significance in what was encoded, retained, and later recalled.

Is emotional memory a type of long-term memory?

Emotional significance can affect long-term episodic and autobiographical memories, associative learning, and sometimes performance in short-delay tasks. Emotional memory is therefore best treated as a cross-cutting research category rather than a separate long-term store parallel to episodic or semantic memory.

Why do I remember embarrassing moments from years ago?

Embarrassment can make an event personally salient and encourage later reflection or rehearsal. This may preserve some components of the episode. How accessible the memory remains depends on individual meaning, cues, repeated remembering, and competing experiences.

Do happy memories last longer than sad memories?

There is no general rule. Both kinds can persist. The effect of valence depends on arousal, meaning, attention, rehearsal, event structure, memory test, and time since the experience. Group-average findings cannot predict the duration of a particular personal memory.

Are emotionally vivid memories accurate?

They can preserve important information, but their vividness is not a direct measure of factual accuracy. A person can vividly recall the emotional center of an event while misremembering contextual features. Consistency, confidence, and objective accuracy should be assessed separately.

What is the difference between emotional memory and flashbulb memory?

Emotional memory covers a wide range of processes influenced by emotion. Flashbulb memory is a narrower term for particularly vivid recollections of the circumstances in which one learned about a consequential or surprising event. Flashbulb memories are not uniquely accurate photographs.

Why does a smell or song bring back strong feelings?

Sensory cues can become associated with a meaningful experience. Encountering a related cue later may make aspects of the experience more accessible or trigger an emotional response. The mechanism in a particular case depends on learning history and context.

Can emotions change a memory after the event?

Yes. Current interpretations, goals, mood, and later information can shape what is recalled and how the experience is narrated. Emotional autobiographical memory often combines persistence of core significance with changes in individual details. This should not be equated with a claim that all memory reports are inaccurate.

Can stress erase or permanently imprint a memory?

Stress effects vary with timing, level, and context. Intense stress can disrupt attention or retrieval in some circumstances and strengthen retention of selected information in others. Neither permanent imprinting nor automatic erasure is a scientifically general outcome.

Is emotional memory stored in the amygdala?

The amygdala participates in emotional learning and can modulate memory in other regions. Remembering a personal episode depends on interactions among multiple brain systems, including the hippocampus and cortical networks. The brain does not use a single emotional memory vault.

Does sleep specifically protect emotional memories?

Sleep supports memory processing, but research on a selective advantage for emotional over neutral information is inconsistent. A relevant meta-analysis did not find an overall preferential sleep effect. The outcome varies with task and methodology.

Can I deliberately strengthen good memories?

Revisiting meaningful experiences, recording accurate details soon afterward, and reflecting on what an experience meant can maintain access to personal events. These activities are not guaranteed to preserve every detail, and repeated interpretation can also reshape an account. Where accuracy matters, contemporaneous notes are useful.

When should memory concerns be assessed?

If forgetting or unusual memory experiences become persistent, progressive, distressing, or disruptive to daily functioning, a healthcare professional can evaluate the full context. One emotionally intense memory or a single lapse is insufficient for diagnosis. Sudden confusion or new neurological symptoms require prompt medical assessment.

References

Dolcos, F., LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2004). Interaction between the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system predicts better memory for emotional events. Neuron, 42(5), 855–863. PubMed · DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00289-2

Frinco, R., et al. (2024). A review of longitudinal studies on flashbulb memories: Where we started, are, and are going? Applied Cognitive Psychology. DOI

Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Remembering the details: Effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1(2), 99–113. DOI

Kensinger, E. A., & Ford, J. H. (2020). Retrieval of emotional events from memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 251–272. DOI

Mather, M., & Sutherland, M. R. (2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114–133. DOI

McGaugh, J. L. (2004). The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 1–28. DOI

Phelps, E. A. (2004). Human emotion and memory: Interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 198–202. DOI

Rawson, G., & Jackson, M. L. (2024). Sleep and emotional memory: A review of current findings and application to a clinical population. Current Sleep Medicine Reports, 10, 378–385. DOI

Reed, A. E., Chan, L., & Mikels, J. A. (2014). Meta-analysis of the age-related positivity effect: Age differences in preferences for positive over negative information. Psychology and Aging, 29(1), 1–15. DOI

Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14(5), 455–461. DOI

Wardell, V., & Palombo, D. J. (2024). Stability and malleability of emotional autobiographical memories. Nature Reviews Psychology, 3, 393–406. DOI

Waring, J. D., & Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Effects of emotional valence and arousal upon memory trade-offs with aging. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 412–422. DOI

Yin, H., Zhou, Y., & Li, Z. (2024). Contradictory findings in the study of emotional false memory: A review on the inadvisability of controlling valence and arousal. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1380742. DOI

Psychological Encyclopedia