Does Sugar Keep You Awake? Energy, Arousal, and Sleep Timing
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 29, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Sugar does not behave like a reliable stimulant. Controlled human research does not support the familiar idea that eating sugar produces a dependable “sugar rush” that makes people more alert and therefore keeps them awake. The strongest acute meta-analysis found no mood benefit from carbohydrate intake and, in the first hour, found more fatigue and lower alertness in some comparisons. That is already enough to reject the simple chain “sugar → instant energy → wakefulness.”
Sleep is more complicated. Human studies do suggest that diet quality, glycemic characteristics, eating patterns, and higher sugar intake can be associated with sleep onset, sleep fragmentation, or insomnia symptoms. Yet those findings do not show that one dessert at night will keep a particular person awake, and they do not establish sugar as a caffeine-like arousal agent. A sweet food may also contain caffeine, arrive with a large late meal, be eaten during an already stimulating evening, or become part of a learned bedtime routine.
The most accurate answer to “does sugar keep you awake?” is therefore: sometimes a sugar-containing food may be part of a pattern that disrupts sleep, but sugar itself is not a proven acute stimulant and the effect depends on timing, food context, overall diet, caffeine, sleep pressure, and individual response. The evidence is strongest for associations between broader dietary patterns and sleep, while sugar-specific bedtime causation remains limited.
Quick answer: can sugar keep you awake at night?
For most people, there is no good evidence that sugar by itself acts like a wake-promoting drug. In a 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis of 31 acute carbohydrate studies, carbohydrates did not improve mood at any measured time point. During the first hour after consumption, participants were more fatigued and less alert in some comparisons than after placebo. The popular “sugar rush” is therefore a poor explanation for feeling unusually awake after dessert.
At the same time, sleep studies do not give sugar a completely neutral role. In a small inpatient study, a higher percentage of daily energy from sugar was associated with more nighttime arousals. Observational studies have linked higher dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, added sugars, or less healthy dietary patterns with more insomnia symptoms. Those results matter, but they answer a different question from “will this cookie keep me awake tonight?” They describe sleep quality and dietary patterns, not a universal immediate stimulant effect. For the broader evidence across dietary patterns, glycemic measures, meal timing, and sleep outcomes, see Sugar and Sleep: Timing, Diet Patterns, and What the Evidence Shows.
A useful way to think about the evidence is to separate three levels. Acute alertness asks what happens in the minutes and hours after eating. Sleep physiology asks what happens to sleep onset, stages, arousals, and continuity that night. Habitual diet asks whether repeated dietary patterns are associated with sleep problems over weeks, months, or years. Mixing these levels is one reason online explanations often contradict one another.
What “sugar” means in sleep research
The word sugar can refer to several different exposures, and sleep studies do not measure them interchangeably. Table sugar is sucrose. Foods can also contain glucose, fructose, lactose, and other sugars. The U.S. Nutrition Facts label distinguishes total sugars from added sugars: FDA defines total sugars as naturally occurring sugars plus any added sugars, while added sugars are sugars added during processing or packaged as sweeteners, including table sugar, syrups, honey, and certain concentrated juices.
Sleep research may instead use total carbohydrate, percentage of energy from sugar, dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, sugar-sweetened beverage intake, or a broader high-fat/high-sugar dietary pattern. These variables overlap, but they are not equivalent. A study of high-glycemic rice is not automatically a study of added sugar. A study of sugary drinks is not automatically evidence about whole fruit. A study of a high-fat/high-sugar diet cannot tell us which component caused an observed sleep difference.
This distinction is central to the evidence. Search results often collapse “sugar,” “high glycemic index,” “refined carbohydrate,” and “sweet food” into one category. That makes the conclusion sound stronger than the study design allows.
Sugar provides metabolic energy, but metabolic energy is not the same as feeling awake
Carbohydrates are a source of metabolic energy, and glucose is an important fuel for the body and brain. But the word energy has two meanings in everyday conversation. In nutrition, energy refers to chemical energy measured in calories. In psychology, “I feel energetic” means subjective activation, alertness, motivation, or readiness to act. Those meanings should not be treated as synonyms.
A sweet food can provide calories without producing a measurable increase in subjective alertness. The Mantantzis et al. meta-analysis is especially useful here because it directly examined acute carbohydrate effects on mood. Its results did not show a dependable psychological energy boost. For the broader distinction between fuel and felt energy, see Sugar and Energy: Why Sweet Foods Can Feel Energizing.
That distinction also helps explain why someone can say “dessert woke me up” while controlled studies fail to find a universal stimulant effect. The experience may be real while the assumed mechanism is wrong. Arousal can come from caffeine, anticipation, social activity, light exposure, an engaging environment, or simply being awake at a time when the person expected to be winding down.
The “sugar rush” does not explain bedtime wakefulness well
The sugar-rush story usually assumes a rapid rise in available carbohydrate creates a burst of behavioral or mental activation. Controlled evidence does not support that as a general human effect. The acute meta-analysis found no positive effect on mood and found more fatigue and less alertness within the first hour in some comparisons. Our dedicated evidence review, Sugar Rush: Is It Real? Energy, Expectation, and the Evidence, covers that literature in depth.
This matters for sleep because the reasoning “sugar makes you hyper, therefore sugar before bed keeps you awake” starts with a premise that does not hold up well. A person can certainly feel activated after a sweet snack, but that does not establish sugar as the cause, and it does not make the experience equivalent to pharmacological stimulation.
There is also a long history of the sugar-hyperactivity belief in children. A meta-analysis of controlled studies in children found no overall effect of sugar on behavior or cognitive performance. That literature does not prove that every child responds identically, but it strongly argues against using “sugar makes children hyper” as a general explanation for bedtime wakefulness.
What sleep-laboratory research actually shows
Higher sugar intake and nighttime arousals
One of the most frequently cited sugar-and-sleep studies was conducted by St-Onge and colleagues. Twenty-six normal-weight adults aged 30 to 45 were studied under inpatient conditions. After several days of a controlled diet, participants had a day of self-selected eating followed by polysomnography. Sleep after the self-selected diet had less slow-wave sleep and longer sleep-onset latency than after controlled feeding. Within the self-selected day, a higher percentage of energy from sugar was associated with more arousals.
That result supports a possible link between a higher-sugar dietary pattern and more fragmented sleep, but it does not show that sugar alone caused the arousals. The same study found relationships with fiber, saturated fat, and other carbohydrate. The relevant exposure was a day of eating, not a purified dose of sucrose immediately before bedtime. The authors themselves concluded that diet could be relevant to sleep but required further testing.
The practical meaning is modest but useful: if sleep feels fragmented after evenings that include a lot of sweet, low-fiber, highly processed food, that observation is compatible with the research. It still does not identify sugar as the sole mechanism.
High-glycemic carbohydrate can sometimes shorten sleep onset
A widely cited randomized study produces a result that runs against the idea that carbohydrate necessarily keeps people awake. In 12 healthy young men, Afaghi and colleagues compared high- and low-glycemic-index rice meals. A high-glycemic meal eaten four hours before bedtime was followed by shorter sleep-onset latency than a low-glycemic meal. The same high-glycemic meal was also associated with faster sleep onset when eaten four hours rather than one hour before bed. Other sleep variables did not significantly change.
That study was small, used carbohydrate-rich rice meals rather than “sugar” as an isolated ingredient, and involved healthy young men. It cannot justify recommending high-glycemic food as a sleep aid. What it can do is falsify an overly broad claim: rapidly available carbohydrate does not consistently prolong wakefulness.
A 2021 systematic review of glycemic index/load and sleep found mixed results across 10 studies. Some small trials suggested faster sleep onset with high-glycemic meals, while other trials found no significant effect, and observational studies pointed in different directions. The authors judged the evidence insufficient for definitive conclusions.
Newer intervention evidence remains mixed rather than stimulant-like
A 2024 randomized controlled trial in 42 trained men manipulated carbohydrate timing and evening glycemic index while participants also followed a standardized exercise program. Sleep improved over the four-week intervention, but the main changes were independent of carbohydrate type or timing. This does not prove evening carbohydrate is irrelevant; it shows why a simple rule about carbohydrate timing is difficult to defend when other lifestyle factors are controlled.
Another randomized crossover study exposed 15 healthy young men to an isocaloric high-fat/high-sugar diet and a low-fat/low-sugar diet for one week. The high-fat/high-sugar diet altered sleep microstructure during deep sleep even though total sleep duration and conventional sleep macrostructure did not differ. Because fat and sugar changed together, the trial cannot isolate sugar. It is better evidence for diet composition affecting sleep physiology than for “sugar keeps you awake.”
A small 2025 free-living study adds another caution. In 34 younger adults monitored across multiple days, greater fruit and vegetable intake and total carbohydrate intake predicted less sleep fragmentation, while added sugar was not associated with fragmentation. The sample was small, so the null result does not settle the question; it shows that sugar-specific effects are not uniform across study designs.
Habitual diet and insomnia: association is stronger than sugar-specific causation
The case becomes stronger when researchers examine habitual dietary patterns, but the interpretation also becomes broader. In the Women’s Health Initiative, Gangwisch and colleagues analyzed dietary glycemic measures and insomnia in tens of thousands of postmenopausal women. Higher dietary glycemic index was associated with higher odds of prevalent and incident insomnia, and higher added-sugar intake was associated with higher odds of incident insomnia. The design was observational, so it could not prove that added sugar caused the sleep problem.
A more recent 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis of 37 observational studies involving 591,223 participants found that healthier dietary patterns were associated with fewer insomnia symptoms, while higher dietary glycemic index, higher glycemic load, and unhealthy dietary patterns were associated with more insomnia symptoms. The authors rated the certainty of evidence as very low, which is important: large sample size does not automatically convert observational association into causal proof.
A broader systematic review of diet and sleep quality similarly concluded that healthier foods tended to be associated with better sleep quality and processed or free-sugar-rich foods with worse sleep features. This is consistent with an overall diet–sleep relationship, while still leaving uncertainty about the independent contribution of sugar.
Does sugar before bed keep you awake? Timing matters, but there is no universal sugar cutoff
The evidence does not support a universal rule such as “never eat sugar within two hours of bed” or “stop sugar exactly four hours before sleep.” Human experiments are too few, too small, and too heterogeneous to justify a precise sugar-specific cutoff. One small high-glycemic meal study found faster sleep onset at four hours than at one hour before bedtime, while other trials have produced mixed or null differences.
Timing still matters because eating happens inside a circadian and behavioral context. A late dessert can extend an evening routine, accompany screens or social activity, follow a large meal, or include caffeine. If a person notices a reproducible pattern of longer sleep onset after a particular evening snack, the useful question is not “Is sugar universally stimulating?” but “What changed in this specific evening exposure?”
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s guidance for insomnia emphasizes regular schedules and avoiding late-night dinners, while specifically identifying caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol as substances that can disrupt sleep. It does not identify sugar as a universal stimulant. See the NHLBI insomnia treatment guidance.
A sweet food can keep you awake because of caffeine, not because it is sweet
This is one of the most important practical distinctions. Cola, energy drinks, coffee beverages, some teas, chocolate-containing products, and many sweetened performance products may contain caffeine. If a sugary product also contains caffeine, the caffeine has a much clearer wake-promoting mechanism and evidence base than the sugar.
In a controlled study, 400 mg of caffeine taken at bedtime, three hours before bedtime, or even six hours before bedtime significantly disrupted sleep compared with placebo. That dose is higher than many everyday servings, and sensitivity varies, but the experiment demonstrates a direct sleep-disruptive effect that is qualitatively different from the uncertain sugar-specific story.
So when someone says “a sweet coffee kept me awake,” both parts of the sentence matter. The sweetness may shape liking and consumption, while caffeine can directly delay or disrupt sleep. Blaming sugar alone can hide the more plausible driver.
Why you may feel more awake after something sweet even without a sugar stimulant effect
Expectation can shape interpretation
People do not experience food in a psychological vacuum. If you expect sugar to make you energetic, normal fluctuations in arousal can be interpreted as a “rush.” This does not mean the sensation is imaginary. It means the label applied to the sensation can be influenced by expectation, prior beliefs, context, and attention to bodily changes.
The classic child-behavior literature demonstrates how powerful expectation can be. In one randomized expectancy experiment, mothers who were told their children had received sugar rated them as more hyperactive even though the children had actually received placebo. That study addressed parent perception rather than sleep, but it illustrates a general psychological principle: causal beliefs can organize how ambiguous behavior is noticed and interpreted.
Reward and novelty can raise arousal without proving a sugar rush
Dessert can be pleasurable, anticipated, social, and behaviorally activating. Opening a favorite snack, watching a show, gaming, talking with friends, or treating oneself late at night can create a broader reward episode. Sweetness is part of that event, but the event includes attention, emotion, sensory reward, and learned associations. Feeling activated in that setting does not establish a direct stimulant action of sucrose.
The time of day changes the baseline
A person who is already sleepy may notice a short-lived change in perceived alertness after standing up, preparing food, turning on lights, scrolling a phone, or moving around the kitchen. Conversely, someone who is already physiologically aroused by stress may eat something sweet while remaining awake and then attribute the wakefulness to the food. Timing can create convincing personal stories even when multiple causes changed together.
Why sugar can make some people feel tired instead of awake
The opposite experience is also common: people report sleepiness or fatigue after sweets or a carbohydrate-heavy meal. Acute experimental evidence fits this better than the universal sugar-rush narrative. The same 2019 carbohydrate meta-analysis found greater fatigue and lower alertness during the first hour in some comparisons.
That does not mean sugar is a sedative. Meals, circadian timing, prior sleep debt, meal size, expectation, and other nutrients can all influence post-meal experience. Our dedicated article Why Does Sugar Make Me Tired? Energy, Meals, Sleep, and Expectation explains that pattern without treating fatigue as proof of a blood-glucose disorder.
Likewise, the popular term “sugar crash” describes a subjective pattern, not a diagnosis. The article Sugar Crash: What It Means and Why Energy Can Feel Different separates ordinary changes in energy and alertness from medical interpretations.
The relationship runs both ways: poor sleep can change eating
The direction of causality can also reverse. Someone may assume that sugar caused poor sleep when insufficient sleep was already changing appetite, food choice, and the opportunity to eat. A systematic review and meta-analysis of partial sleep deprivation found that sleep restriction increased daily energy intake by an average of about 385 kcal in the pooled intervention studies, without a corresponding increase in energy expenditure.
Other systematic reviews of sleep restriction similarly report increased energy intake and changes in hunger or reward-related food responses. This makes the sleep–diet relationship bidirectional: diet can correlate with sleep, and sleep loss can change the conditions under which people choose and consume food.
For the specific direction sleep loss → sweet cravings and reward-driven eating, see Sleep and Sugar Cravings: How Sleep Loss Can Change Appetite and Reward. That is a different search intent from the present article, which asks whether sugar itself keeps you awake.
Does sugar cause insomnia?
Current evidence does not justify saying that eating sugar causes insomnia in an individual. Insomnia is a sleep disorder defined by difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or obtaining good-quality sleep despite adequate opportunity and circumstances for sleep, with meaningful daytime effects. The NHLBI overview of insomnia emphasizes that insomnia has many possible contributors, including stress, schedule changes, environment, substances, other sleep disorders, medical conditions, and behavioral patterns.
Higher glycemic index, glycemic load, added-sugar intake, and unhealthy dietary patterns have been associated with insomnia symptoms in observational research. Those associations make diet a reasonable part of the sleep picture. They do not establish that one sugary food caused a person’s insomnia, and they do not support diagnosing insomnia from a single restless night.
Persistent sleep difficulty deserves a broader assessment rather than a single-food explanation. Sleep timing, caffeine, alcohol, medications, stress, pain, breathing problems, restless legs, mood, environment, and other factors can all matter. The useful role of food tracking is to identify reproducible patterns, not to turn one ingredient into a universal cause.
What about blood sugar spikes and crashes?
Popular sleep articles often explain bedtime wakefulness with a detailed sequence involving a blood-sugar spike, insulin, a later crash, adrenaline, cortisol, and nighttime awakening. That chain is frequently presented as if it were established for ordinary healthy people after any sweet food. The human sleep literature does not support using that sequence as a universal explanation.
Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load can be relevant research variables, but they are not the same as a clinical glucose reading, and subjective wakefulness is not a diagnostic test. Fasting glucose, glucose targets, A1C, continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, diabetes treatment, and individualized glucose management belong to medical care and are outside the scope of this article.
If a person has diagnosed diabetes, uses glucose-lowering medication, has recurrent symptoms suggesting abnormal glucose regulation, or receives individualized instructions from a clinician, bedtime eating should be discussed in that medical context rather than inferred from general sleep research.
Added sugar, total sugar, fruit, and whole foods should not be treated as identical
A fruit, a sweetened soda, a bowl of cereal, a piece of chocolate, and a spoonful of table sugar can all contribute sugars, but their food matrices and accompanying nutrients differ. The FDA’s regulatory category of added sugars excludes sugars naturally occurring in milk, fruits, and vegetables. Sleep studies likewise vary in whether they measure added sugar, total sugar, total carbohydrate, glycemic index, or complete dietary patterns.
Because of that heterogeneity, evidence linking a high-added-sugar or high-glycemic dietary pattern with poorer sleep cannot simply be transferred to whole fruit. Nor can an acute high-glycemic rice experiment be treated as proof about every dessert. A careful answer follows the exact exposure studied.
Practical meaning: how to test whether a bedtime sweet is affecting your sleep
If you repeatedly suspect that a particular sweet food keeps you awake, a simple personal observation can be more informative than adopting a universal internet rule. Keep the test behavioral rather than medical: compare otherwise similar evenings, change one variable at a time, and record when you ate, what you ate, whether it contained caffeine, when you went to bed, roughly how long sleep onset seemed to take, and whether you woke repeatedly.
The most useful comparison is often the same food earlier versus later, or the same evening routine with and without that food, while keeping caffeine and bedtime reasonably stable. Repeating the comparison over several nights reduces the chance that one stressful day, an unusual schedule, or expectation will dominate the conclusion.
A sleep diary is also a standard tool in clinical sleep assessment. NHLBI recommends tracking sleep patterns when sleep problems persist. You do not need glucose measurements to answer the behavioral question “does this evening routine reliably change my sleep?”
If the suspected food is a caffeinated sweet drink, coffee beverage, tea, energy product, or chocolate product, evaluate caffeine separately. If the problem is frequent or persistent difficulty falling asleep, staying asleep, or functioning during the day, the bigger issue is the sleep problem itself rather than proving that sugar caused it.
Evidence status: what is established, what is plausible, and what remains contested
Established or well supported
Acute carbohydrate intake does not produce a reliable general “sugar rush” in controlled human studies. Caffeine has a direct, well-established capacity to disrupt sleep. Sleep and eating behavior influence each other, and experimental sleep restriction tends to increase energy intake. Diet quality is meaningfully associated with sleep outcomes across observational research.
Supported but context-dependent
Higher sugar intake has been associated with more nocturnal arousals in a small inpatient study. Higher dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, added-sugar intake, and less healthy dietary patterns have been associated with insomnia symptoms in large observational datasets and meta-analyses. Short-term high-fat/high-sugar diets can alter aspects of sleep microstructure. These findings support a diet–sleep relationship without isolating a universal sugar effect.
Preliminary or inconsistent
The effect of carbohydrate glycemic index and timing on sleep onset is inconsistent across small trials and special populations. Some studies suggest high-glycemic carbohydrate may shorten sleep onset; others find no clear effect or no independent effect of timing/type. Precise bedtime cutoffs for sugar are therefore not evidence-based.
Contested or oversimplified
“Sugar gives everyone a burst of energy that keeps them awake,” “sugar is basically a stimulant,” “any sugar before bed causes insomnia,” and “a nighttime sugar crash universally triggers stress hormones and awakening” are oversimplified claims. The current human evidence does not support them as general rules.
Frequently asked questions
Can sugar keep you awake at night?
It can be part of a sleep-disrupting evening pattern, but sugar itself is not a reliable acute stimulant. Human evidence is mixed: higher sugar intake is associated with more sleep arousals or insomnia symptoms in some studies, while controlled carbohydrate studies do not show a universal alertness boost.
Does eating sugar right before bed make it harder to fall asleep?
Not reliably. One small trial found that a high-glycemic meal four hours before bedtime shortened sleep-onset latency compared with a low-glycemic meal, and the same meal produced faster sleep onset at four hours than at one hour before bed. Other trials are mixed. There is no universal sugar-specific bedtime interval supported by strong evidence.
How many hours before bed should I stop eating sugar?
Research has not established a precise number of hours that applies to everyone. If you suspect a personal effect, compare the same snack earlier and later while keeping caffeine, bedtime, and the rest of the evening as similar as practical. General sleep guidance emphasizes regular meals and avoiding late-night dinners rather than a fixed sugar cutoff.
Can sugar cause insomnia?
Higher added-sugar and high-glycemic dietary patterns are associated with insomnia symptoms in observational research, but those studies do not prove that sugar causes clinical insomnia. Persistent insomnia is multi-factorial and should not be attributed to one ingredient from timing alone.
Why do I feel energized after sugar if studies do not show a sugar rush?
A real feeling of activation can come from multiple components of the situation: caffeine, reward, expectation, movement, light, social context, hunger relief, or normal fluctuations in arousal. Calories provide metabolic energy, but metabolic energy and subjective alertness are not the same outcome.
Why does sugar sometimes make me sleepy instead?
Acute carbohydrate studies have found more fatigue and lower alertness in some comparisons. Meal size, circadian timing, previous sleep, other nutrients, and expectations can also shape post-meal sleepiness. Feeling tired after a sweet food does not by itself establish a glucose disorder.
Does sugar make children hyper and keep them awake?
Controlled evidence does not support a general sugar-hyperactivity effect in children. A meta-analysis of blinded studies found no overall effect on behavior or cognitive performance. Bedtime difficulties in children can still have many behavioral, environmental, developmental, and medical contributors. ADHD is a separate clinical question; see Sugar and ADHD: What Research Shows and What It Does Not.
What if the sugar is in coffee, cola, an energy drink, or chocolate?
Then caffeine becomes an important separate variable. Caffeine has direct evidence for disrupting sleep even when taken several hours before bedtime. A sweet caffeinated product should not be used as evidence that sweetness or sugar itself caused wakefulness.
Does poor sleep make you crave sugar the next day?
Sleep restriction can increase energy intake and alter reward-related food behavior, so the relationship can run from sleep to eating as well as from diet to sleep. That reverse direction is important when interpreting a night of poor sleep followed by stronger cravings.
Is fruit sugar likely to keep me awake in the same way as added sugar?
The evidence does not justify treating whole fruit and added sugar as equivalent exposures. Whole fruit contains a different food matrix, and sleep studies vary widely in what they measure. In a small 2025 study of younger adults, greater fruit and vegetable intake predicted less sleep fragmentation, while added sugar was not associated with fragmentation.
Should I quit sugar to sleep better?
The evidence does not support complete sugar avoidance as a universal insomnia treatment. A more useful approach is to examine the whole evening pattern: diet quality, meal timing, caffeine, alcohol, sleep schedule, stress, and whether a particular food reproducibly changes your sleep.
Conclusion: sugar is part of the sleep context, not a simple wakefulness switch
Sugar does not reliably “switch on” wakefulness. The strongest acute evidence argues against a universal sugar rush, and some carbohydrate studies actually show greater fatigue or faster sleep onset. At the same time, higher sugar intake, high-glycemic dietary patterns, and less healthy diets have been associated with more arousals, poorer sleep features, or insomnia symptoms in several human studies.
The evidence therefore supports a layered answer. Acute stimulation from sugar is weakly supported. Diet–sleep associations are real enough to take seriously. Sugar-specific bedtime causation remains uncertain. Caffeine is a clearer explanation when it is present. Sleep loss can also change appetite and food choice, creating a two-way relationship.
For an individual reader, the practical question is not whether sugar has a universal bedtime rule. It is whether a repeatable evening pattern — a specific food, timing, amount, caffeine exposure, and surrounding routine — changes sleep. That question can be tested with ordinary observation while keeping medical glucose management and clinical sleep diagnosis in their proper domains.
Related Articles
References
Afaghi, A., O’Connor, H., & Chow, C. M. (2007). High-glycemic-index carbohydrate meals shorten sleep onset. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 85(2), 426–430. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/85.2.426. PubMed
Al Khatib, H. K., Harding, S. V., Darzi, J., & Pot, G. K. (2017). The effects of partial sleep deprivation on energy balance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71(5), 614–624. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.201. PubMed
Amiri-Ardekani, E., Kazemi, A., Sasani, N., Fanfulla, F., & Clark, C. C. (2022). The association of meal glycemic index/load with quantitative and qualitative indicators of sleep: a systematic review. Minerva Medica, 113(6), 1008–1016. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.21.07444-9. PubMed
Arab, A., Karimi, E., Garaulet, M., & Scheer, F. A. J. L. (2024). Dietary patterns and insomnia symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 75, 101936. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2024.101936. PubMed
Boege, H. L., Wilson, K. D., Kilkus, J. M., Qiu, W., Cheng, B., Wroblewski, K. E., Tucker, B., Tasali, E., & St-Onge, M.-P. (2025). Higher daytime intake of fruits and vegetables predicts less disrupted nighttime sleep in younger adults. Sleep Health, 11(5), 590–596. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleh.2025.05.003. PubMed
Brandão, L. E. M., Popa, A., Cedernaes, E., Cedernaes, C., Lampola, L., & Cedernaes, J. (2023). Exposure to a more unhealthy diet impacts sleep microstructure during normal sleep and recovery sleep: A randomized trial. Obesity, 31(7), 1755–1766. DOI: 10.1002/oby.23787. PubMed
Drake, C., Roehrs, T., Shambroom, J., & Roth, T. (2013). Caffeine effects on sleep taken 0, 3, or 6 hours before going to bed. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 9(11), 1195–1200. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.3170. PubMed
Food and Drug Administration. (2026). Added Sugars on the Nutrition Facts Label. FDA
Gangwisch, J. E., Hale, L., St-Onge, M.-P., Choi, L., LeBlanc, E. S., Malaspina, D., Opler, M. G., Shadyab, A. H., Shikany, J. M., Snetselaar, L., Zaslavsky, O., & Lane, D. (2020). High glycemic index and glycemic load diets as risk factors for insomnia: analyses from the Women’s Health Initiative. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 111(2), 429–439. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz275. PubMed
Godos, J., Grosso, G., Castellano, S., Galvano, F., Caraci, F., & Ferri, R. (2021). Association between diet and sleep quality: A systematic review. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 57, 101430. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101430. PubMed
Hoover, D. W., & Milich, R. (1994). Effects of sugar ingestion expectancies on mother-child interactions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22(4), 501–515. DOI: 10.1007/BF02168088. PubMed
Mantantzis, K., Schlaghecken, F., Sünram-Lea, S. I., & Maylor, E. A. (2019). Sugar rush or sugar crash? A meta-analysis of carbohydrate effects on mood. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 101, 45–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.016. PubMed
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2022). Insomnia. NHLBI
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2022). Insomnia: Treatment. NHLBI
St-Onge, M.-P., Mikic, A., & Pietrolungo, C. E. (2016). Effects of Diet on Sleep Quality. Advances in Nutrition, 7(5), 938–949. DOI: 10.3945/an.116.012336. PubMed
St-Onge, M.-P., Roberts, A., Shechter, A., & Choudhury, A. R. (2016). Fiber and Saturated Fat Are Associated with Sleep Arousals and Slow Wave Sleep. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 12(1), 19–24. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.5384. PubMed
Vlahoyiannis, A., Andreou, E., Bargiotas, P., Aphamis, G., Sakkas, G. K., & Giannaki, C. D. (2024). The effect of chrono-nutritional manipulation of carbohydrate intake on sleep macrostructure: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Nutrition, 43(3), 858–868. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.02.016. PubMed
Wolraich, M. L., Wilson, D. B., & White, J. W. (1995). The effect of sugar on behavior or cognition in children: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 274(20), 1617–1621. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1995.03530200053037. PubMed