Dissociative Fugue: Symptoms, Memory Loss, and Clinical Assessment
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Dissociation & Dissociative Disorders · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Dissociative fugue is an uncommon clinical presentation involving a substantial disturbance of autobiographical memory together with unexpected travel or wandering away from a person's customary surroundings. A person may temporarily lose access to important facts about their identity or life history and may appear outwardly organized while the episode unfolds. The central clinical question is whether the presentation meets criteria for dissociative amnesia with fugue after neurological, substance-related, medical, and other psychiatric explanations have been carefully evaluated. American Psychiatric Association diagnostic revision review and the WHO ICD-11 clinical diagnostic manual provide the classification framework. For a related clinical perspective, see Dissociative Amnesia: Symptoms, Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
A sudden disappearance, an unfamiliar location, or the statement 'I do not remember how I got here' can have several explanations. Acute confusion or memory loss may require immediate medical assessment because stroke, seizure activity, head injury, intoxication, metabolic disturbance, and other causes can present with superficially similar signs. This article explains the clinical meaning of fugue, recognizable patterns, assessment, differential diagnosis, treatment evidence, prognosis, and practical responses, while reserving the full treatment of dissociative amnesia for its separate parent article.
What Is Dissociative Fugue?
The term fugue originates from a word meaning flight. Clinically, dissociative fugue describes an episode of dissociative amnesia in which a person travels or wanders away from their usual surroundings while experiencing a disruption in autobiographical memory and, in more characteristic presentations, in the sense of personal identity. The movement may be as ordinary as leaving home and going somewhere else, or it may involve considerable distance and a period of unfamiliar living. Travel alone is insufficient: the memory and identity disturbance must be established clinically, and other causes must be assessed. Merck Manual Professional describes fugue in the context of dissociative amnesia.
Some people continue to speak, purchase food, use transport, or interact socially during an episode. Preserved everyday behaviors therefore do not prove that autobiographical memory is intact. Others appear confused, distressed, or disoriented. Dramatic stories of a person entirely reinventing a life belong to the possible clinical spectrum, but they are not the defining or usual pattern.
Is dissociative fugue a separate disorder?
In DSM-5 and DSM-5-TR, fugue is a specifier of dissociative amnesia, often described as 'with dissociative fugue,' rather than a freestanding diagnosis. The DSM-5 revision account specifically documents this change from earlier diagnostic editions. In ICD-11, the broader category is dissociative amnesia (6B61), with dissociative amnesia with dissociative fugue coded 6B61.0 and without fugue coded 6B61.1. WHO describes the fugue presentation using identity loss and sudden travel away from home, work, or significant others, potentially lasting days or weeks. These are different classification structures addressing the same clinical domain, not competing proofs about individual patients. The WHO CDDR is the authoritative clinical reference.
How is fugue different from everyday dissociation?
Ordinary experiences of being absorbed in a book, traveling on autopilot, or momentarily zoning out do not amount to dissociative fugue. Neither does leaving the house while upset, forgetting a routine journey, or having difficulty remembering where one put an object. Clinical fugue concerns unusually significant autobiographical amnesia, a disruption involving travel and often identity, and relevant clinical impairment or risk. The assessment is based on the whole clinical picture, not a single striking anecdote.
Symptoms and Signs of a Fugue Episode
Symptoms can change across three periods: what is observed during travel, what becomes apparent when the person is located, and what remains after the episode has ended. Because many people present retrospectively, collateral accounts and verified timelines may be more informative than an isolated description of how an episode felt.
Autobiographical memory loss
The hallmark is difficulty recalling personally significant information that would ordinarily be available: parts of one's life history, identity, home circumstances, relationships, or events leading up to and during an absence. This predominantly concerns autobiographical or retrograde memory. Some individuals retain general knowledge, language, and learned routines. Others show wider disruption. The pattern may be patchy or extensive. Harrison and colleagues' 53-case clinical study documented distinct patterns of functional/psychogenic amnesia, including fugue and persistent focal retrograde amnesia.
Unexpected travel or wandering
A person may be absent from their familiar environment without later understanding why or how the journey occurred. Reports can involve walking, public transportation, or travel between cities. Some episodes are discovered because the person seeks help while lost; others become apparent only when family, coworkers, or authorities reconstruct events. Travel can also occur for countless non-dissociative reasons, including voluntary departure, substance use, seizure-related automatisms, sleep disorders, or neurological confusion.
Changes in identity awareness
People may be unable to retrieve their name, recognize connections to their prior life, or provide a stable narrative about who they are. In some recorded cases a different identity is assumed, but this feature is not required in every DSM-described fugue presentation. The occurrence of identity loss should not be conflated with dissociative identity disorder: DID requires a broader and separately assessed pattern of identity disruption and memory gaps, and a single fugue-like experience cannot establish DID.
Behavior that appears surprisingly ordinary
During some fugue episodes, appearance, conversational ability, and practical skills remain sufficiently organized that others may not immediately recognize a problem. This preserved behavior is sometimes described as a puzzle of dissociative amnesia, but it does not license a conclusion that there is no medical problem. Neurological conditions can also preserve many complex abilities while disrupting memory.
Confusion, distress, or a period of missing time afterward
After an episode a person may discover evidence of travel they cannot recall, be startled by their location, or experience distress about missing work, relationships, personal belongings, or responsibilities. The episode itself may remain unremembered even after the usual sense of identity returns. Emotional responses range from fear and shame to apparent calm or partial indifference. None of these responses is a stand-alone diagnostic test.
How Long Does Dissociative Fugue Last?
Clinical accounts describe highly variable duration. Brief episodes can be recognized only through a small gap in a person's schedule, while others involve travel or absence over days and occasionally longer. ICD-11 specifically describes a characteristic extended period of days or weeks for its fugue subtype; DSM-oriented clinical descriptions allow broader examples, including brief travel. The exact interval should be documented rather than forced into an unsupported universal cutoff. Merck Manual describes episodes ranging from hours to months, and the WHO clinical framework explains the ICD-11 classification.
There is no reliable timetable for when autobiographical memories will return. A person may regain access to earlier identity information promptly, slowly, incompletely, or with persistent gaps. Recovery of pre-episode identity does not guarantee recovery of the events during travel. Duration and outcome must be interpreted together with the actual diagnosis, medical findings, comorbidities, and safety circumstances.
Dissociative Fugue and Dissociative Amnesia: The Relationship
Dissociative amnesia refers to clinically significant inability to recall important autobiographical information beyond what ordinary forgetting explains, after relevant alternative diagnoses are considered. Fugue identifies a particular presentation in which such memory disturbance accompanies travel and identity disruption. A person can have dissociative amnesia without ever experiencing fugue. Conversely, people with missing time or unexplained travel do not automatically have dissociative amnesia. The evaluation still must establish the nature and cause of the memory impairment.
The distinction matters for the EN-05 clinical knowledge network. The planned parent topic 'Dissociative Amnesia: Symptoms, Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment' owns the full general clinical category. This article focuses on the travel-and-identity presentation, assessment in the aftermath of an unexplained absence, and safety. Common memory mechanisms and everyday forgetting are separate topics, while seizure-related events and functional neurological symptoms are referred to their respective clinical owners.
Causes, Associated Stressors, and Mechanisms
Stress and trauma are clinically important, but individual causation requires assessment
A number of documented cases follow severe stress, interpersonal crisis, threatening experiences, or a traumatic event. Associations with depression, family conflict, occupational or financial stress, and earlier adversity also occur in clinical series. Yet the presence of an apparent stressor does not establish the cause of a particular episode, and the absence of a disclosed trauma history does not rule a diagnosis in or out. The 53-case study by Harrison et al. examined psychosocial factors while recognizing the heterogeneous presentation, and a separate 28-case study illustrates the diversity of clinical histories.
Autobiographical retrieval and the sense of personal continuity
Contemporary explanations focus in part on disturbed access to autobiographical memory and the person's sense of continuity across time. Memory systems for personal episodes, self-related facts, language, and learned actions need not be affected to the same degree. Cognitive control, stress-related processing, and self-referential networks are investigated as possible contributors. Individual imaging and neuropsychological reports have identified functional changes, but a neural signature diagnostic of fugue has not been established. The documented case involving persistent retrograde amnesia following fugue illustrates why single-case neuroimaging is informative for hypothesis development without proving a general mechanism.
Are memories erased, blocked, or altered?
Clinicians and researchers distinguish failure to retrieve previously encoded information from failure to encode new information. This distinction can help orient assessment, but a patient's experience alone cannot determine the underlying process. 'Blocked memory' is sometimes used as a metaphor for impaired access, and it should not be presented as a demonstrated protective brain program in every case. Different presentations may involve different mechanisms, and direct tests distinguishing a specific dissociative process from all alternatives remain limited.
What remains contested?
The literature contains multiple accounts of functional and dissociative amnesia, including stress-sensitive retrieval models, inhibitory-control accounts, sociocognitive influences, and heterogeneous clinical pathways. Most fugue research consists of case reports, retrospective clinical samples, and small comparative studies. Referral and ascertainment bias, changing diagnostic definitions, incomplete medical workups in older cases, and limited long-term follow-up restrict causal inference and prevalence estimation. There is no scientific basis for assigning a single explanation to every fugue-like presentation.
How Clinicians Assess Suspected Dissociative Fugue
Assessment begins by treating sudden or unexplained memory loss as a diagnostic problem, sometimes an urgent medical one. It is especially important when a person is missing, has been found in unfamiliar surroundings, has recently had a head injury, or cannot reliably describe medication and substance exposure. A clinician first assesses immediate safety and potential neurological or medical emergencies, then reconstructs the episode and considers whether dissociative amnesia with fugue fits the evidence. The acute-amnesia review by Miller and Butler explains why diagnostic differentiation is essential.
1. Immediate stabilization and medical triage
Emergency assessment is appropriate for sudden new amnesia with stroke warning signs, new seizure symptoms, severe headache, head trauma, altered consciousness, significant intoxication or withdrawal, fever with confusion, or inability to maintain personal safety. A person with an unexplained acute memory episode should not drive themselves to care. Evaluation may include vital signs, a neurological examination, blood glucose and other laboratory tests, medication and substance review, and targeted imaging or electroencephalography (EEG) as clinically indicated. These tests are selected by presentation; a normal single test neither establishes nor excludes dissociative fugue.
2. Reconstruct the timeline using multiple sources
The clinician asks when the person was last known to be at baseline, where and how travel occurred, what the person remembers immediately before and afterward, and whether anyone witnessed unusual behavior. With consent and attention to confidentiality, relatives or other reliable witnesses may provide information, as can travel records, workplace logs, emergency records, and contemporaneous messages. Collateral evidence helps establish objective events while avoiding speculative reconstruction of internal experience.
3. Characterize which memory functions are affected
An interview separates identity facts, autobiographical episodes, knowledge of relationships, orientation, newly acquired information, and everyday procedural abilities. Clinicians may examine both retrograde and anterograde memory, attention, language, executive functioning, and consistency across time, rather than relying on a single question such as 'Do you know your name?' Neuropsychological assessment can be particularly helpful when impairment persists or results are atypical. The Harrison study used structured autobiographical memory testing to distinguish clinical patterns.
4. Review psychiatric and situational factors
The evaluation covers recent stressors, possible traumatic exposure, depression, anxiety, sleep disturbance, dissociative symptoms, prior episodes, suicidal thoughts, and practical threats to safety. It also considers cultural context, voluntary travel, domestic safety, possible coercion or exploitation, and whether there is a plausible account based on witnesses and objective records. Psychiatric comorbidity can coexist with a neurological illness; clinicians should avoid framing the workup as a simplistic choice between 'psychological' and 'physical.'
5. Make a diagnosis only after evaluating alternatives
A clinical diagnosis draws on the pattern of memory disturbance, travel or identity disruption, impairment, exclusions and medical findings. DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 provide diagnostic frameworks, while an individualized formulation determines what additional specialists or tests are needed. There is no validated single online fugue questionnaire, memory-gap checklist, or score that confirms the diagnosis. Measures of dissociation can supplement broader assessment, but they cannot replace medical differential diagnosis and a clinical interview.
Differential Diagnosis: Conditions That Can Resemble Fugue
Transient global amnesia
Transient global amnesia usually involves abrupt difficulty forming new memories, repetitive questions, and an episode typically resolving within 24 hours. The person generally retains personal identity, and the presentation does not require unexplained purposeful relocation with identity loss. Transient global amnesia is a neurological syndrome requiring appropriate clinical identification; it is not synonymous with fugue. Neurological Society guideline and the acute-amnesia clinical review describe diagnostic evaluation and red flags.
Transient epileptic amnesia and postictal wandering
Focal seizures, especially of temporal-lobe origin, can cause amnestic episodes, altered awareness, automatisms, and postictal confusion or wandering. Recurrent brief episodes, events on waking, unusual smells, impaired responsiveness, or seizure witnesses may be important clues. In a combined series of 115 transient epileptic amnesia cases, attacks were often short and recurrent, and treatment of the epilepsy commonly controlled seizures. A person who wanders after a seizure requires neurological assessment; the behavior should not be relabeled dissociative fugue on the basis of travel alone.
Stroke, traumatic brain injury, delirium, and metabolic disease
Stroke involving memory-relevant networks, concussion or more serious injury, systemic illness, infections, low blood glucose, medication effects, and delirium can all disrupt memory and orientation. A first-time abrupt episode, new neurological deficits, a fluctuating level of consciousness, or recent injury warrants particularly prompt attention. Normal-appearing conversation and the absence of a dramatic motor deficit cannot rule out all medical causes. Clinical assessment determines when imaging, laboratory tests, ECG, toxicology, or neurological consultation is indicated.
Alcohol, sedatives, and other substances
Alcohol-related blackouts can involve complex behavior with subsequent amnesia because memories were inadequately encoded. Sedatives, other prescribed medications, recreational substances, withdrawal states, and combinations of substances can also produce disorientation or memory gaps. A blackout with travel does not become dissociative fugue merely because the person later cannot recall the trip. Timing, exposure, witnesses, toxicology when indicated, and medical findings matter.
Sleep disorders and parasomnias
Sleepwalking and related conditions can involve getting out of bed, performing activities while incompletely awake, and later remembering little. Circumstances surrounding sleep, timing, witness descriptions, and neurological or sleep assessment distinguish these presentations from a sustained autobiographical-identity disturbance. The full workup of parasomnias belongs to sleep medicine.
Psychosis, mania, panic, and other psychiatric presentations
Travel driven by fixed delusional beliefs, severe mood elevation, panic-driven escape, or confusion associated with psychiatric illness may resemble some outward aspects of fugue. The clinical questions differ: reality testing, mood state, thought organization, the reason for travel, and the characteristic memory pattern all require direct assessment. Hearing a voice, having a panic attack, or becoming overwhelmed does not by itself establish fugue, psychosis, or DID.
Dissociative identity disorder, OSDD, and depersonalization-derealization
DID involves a separately defined pattern of identity disruption and memory discontinuity, and OSDD covers specified dissociative presentations that do not meet criteria for another specific disorder. Depersonalization and derealization concern detachment from self or surroundings and typically retain reality testing; those experiences are not equivalent to fugue travel with autobiographical amnesia. These distinctions should remain tied to each disorder's diagnostic criteria. A person may have more than one symptom domain, but overlap does not collapse the diagnoses.
Intentional absence, inaccurate reporting, and forensic uncertainty
When an absence has financial, legal, interpersonal, or safety consequences, careful documentation is especially important. Objective discrepancies may have various explanations, from confusion and memory distortion to deliberate misrepresentation. Clinicians assess evidence respectfully and avoid assuming either deception or dissociation from motive alone. The task is to establish clinical facts as reliably as possible, not to use a mental health label to settle questions of responsibility.
What Does the Evidence Actually Show?
The evidence for fugue is much smaller than for common mood or anxiety disorders. Population prevalence is difficult to estimate because cases are rare, often evaluated after they end, and can be classified differently across historical manuals. Clinical anecdotes selected for unusual travel or identity change overrepresent dramatic presentations. Consequently, precise population risk, typical duration, relapse rates, and long-term outcomes should not be expressed as settled percentages.
A useful observational contribution comes from Harrison and colleagues (2017), who compared 53 people with psychogenic amnesia with neurological memory-disorder patients and healthy controls. Their clinical classification included fugue, fugue followed by focal retrograde amnesia, focal retrograde amnesia after minor neurological events, and localized gaps. In their fugue subgroup, autobiographical memory scores improved notably over three to six months. The subgroup results cannot be generalized to everyone with fugue: referral patterns, sample size, study era and retrospective classification constrain prognosis.
Clinical research also suggests that a lost sense of personal identity and a sharp autobiographical retrieval disturbance are important clues, while standard learning and procedural functions may be preserved. However, normal structural imaging is neither required nor sufficient for diagnosis. Neuropsychology and neuroimaging can inform an individual formulation, but there is no diagnostic scan for fugue. Clinical neuropsychological cases offer mechanistic hypotheses rather than a single verified pathway.
Treatment and Clinical Management
Safety and stabilization come first
Early priorities include a secure environment, orientation, appropriate medical assessment, rest, access to food and necessary medication, identification of a safe contact when consent permits, and assistance with missing-person or travel-related practical issues. Clinicians also assess immediate psychiatric risks, including suicidality and the person's ability to care for themselves. Stabilization is an active clinical goal even if autobiographical memory has not returned.
Supportive psychotherapy and an individualized plan
When a dissociative formulation remains appropriate after medical review, psychotherapy may address current stress, emotional regulation, coping skills, relational concerns, disruption of daily life, and distress linked to memory gaps. The care plan depends on comorbid disorders and functional needs. Although Merck Manual Professional describes psychotherapy and occasionally memory-facilitating procedures in clinical practice, there are no strong large randomized trials showing that one treatment reliably ends fugue or restores autobiographical memory. This distinction between customary practice and demonstrated efficacy matters.
The limits of evidence for dissociative-disorder treatment
A 2025 systematic review of phase-oriented and other therapies for dissociative disorders identified an emerging evidence base across DID and OSDD samples, with improvements reported across several approaches but an ongoing need for adequately powered controlled studies. Those findings are not direct fugue-treatment trials. Results for DID or OSDD cannot be transferred wholesale to someone whose clinical presentation is dissociative amnesia with fugue.
Hypnosis, memory-recovery techniques, and suggestibility
Historical case descriptions sometimes include hypnosis or medication-facilitated interviews intended to help retrieve memories. Their use is clinically and ethically sensitive because increased vividness or confidence in a memory does not guarantee accuracy. A 2025 research review on hypnosis and memory reported that hypnosis did not reliably improve accurate recall in the studies reviewed and sometimes increased false recollection. An earlier review of hypnosis, memory, and amnesia likewise explains risks of suggestion and illusory recollection.
Contemporary care should avoid leading questions, suggestions of specific forgotten events, pressure to recover a presumed hidden trauma, or treating imagery as proof. If an account emerges in therapy, its historical accuracy may require independent corroboration where factual certainty matters. Treatment success can involve improved stability, functioning, and personal continuity even when gaps remain. The therapeutic aim is not the production of a particular narrative.
Do medications treat fugue directly?
No medication has well-established specific efficacy for dissociative fugue itself. Medicines may be used for independently assessed depression, anxiety, sleep problems, epilepsy, or other co-occurring conditions when appropriate. Sedating a person to obtain a story of past events is not an evidence-based substitute for careful diagnostic evaluation and collaborative treatment planning.
Recovery and Prognosis
Prognosis varies with the cause of the episode, safety circumstances, duration, co-occurring illness, and the degree to which autobiographical memory and functioning recover. Some people rapidly resume their familiar identity but retain limited memory for the time away. Others continue to have fragmented personal recollections or require longer-term support. A favorable group average cannot predict any individual's timeline, and an unresolved memory gap does not automatically indicate irreversible loss.
The Harrison et al. clinical series offers cautiously encouraging observational findings for the subgroup classified as fugue, but the research base remains too small and selective to provide precise probabilities of full recovery or recurrence. Follow-up should prioritize function, mental health symptoms, safety, and whether an initially assumed psychiatric explanation requires reconsideration in light of new neurological evidence.
What to Do if Someone Appears to Be Experiencing Fugue
If you are with a disoriented person
Speak calmly, identify your role, move to a safe location if feasible, and seek prompt medical evaluation for new unexplained memory loss. Avoid forcing an account of past events, confronting the person aggressively about their identity, or giving them a confident diagnosis. If they are missing personal documents, cannot identify a safe destination, or have serious confusion, help connect them with emergency services or an appropriate medical team. If there is immediate danger or a suspected medical emergency, call local emergency services.
If the person is missing
Treat the disappearance as a safety matter first. Contact appropriate local missing-person authorities when indicated; there is no need to wait for a psychiatric explanation before acting. Provide verifiable information about the last known location, medical risks, current medications, and relevant observations. Do not publicly share private health details beyond what is needed for safety.
If you have a memory gap after unexpected travel
Arrange clinical assessment, particularly if the episode is new, unexplained, or associated with injury, intoxication, seizure symptoms, or confusion. Record what you know directly—time, location, messages, witnesses, medications, and substances—without trying to invent missing scenes. Avoid driving until urgent medical causes have been addressed. Ask a trusted person to accompany you if doing so is safe.
If you are supporting recovery
Offer practical help with appointments and everyday responsibilities. Listen without demanding that someone remember, refrain from speculative explanations about hidden trauma, and respect confidentiality. Support plans can include routine, reliable contacts, sleep and stress management, and written safety information personalized with a clinician. Grounding skills may help with distress, but they neither diagnose fugue nor substitute for medical assessment.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a fugue state in psychology?
A fugue state is a clinical description of significant autobiographical amnesia associated with unexpected travel or wandering and potentially disrupted personal identity. DSM-5-TR places fugue under dissociative amnesia rather than defining a separate disorder.
Can a person function normally during dissociative fugue?
Some people retain speech, routine skills, and outwardly organized behavior. That apparent competence does not establish the cause of memory loss. Medical conditions can also preserve some functioning while impairing memory.
Does a person always forget their name?
No. The degree of identity disturbance varies with the presentation and classification. A complete loss of name or life history is a striking possibility, not a requirement that can be applied indiscriminately to every case.
Can someone develop a new identity during fugue?
Assumption of a different identity is reported in some cases, especially historical descriptions. It is neither proof of DID nor a standard feature in every fugue presentation.
Can dissociative fugue last for years?
Rare prolonged cases appear in the clinical literature, but common duration and long-term probabilities cannot be established from dramatic reports. ICD-11 characterizes the travel-and-identity presentation using days or weeks; individual duration requires careful documentation.
Is dissociative fugue caused by trauma?
Fugue has been associated with trauma, acute stress, interpersonal crises, and other psychosocial factors. The relationship in a particular case must be assessed, and clinical diagnosis does not independently prove that a specific traumatic event occurred.
Is dissociative fugue the same as a blackout?
No. Alcohol blackouts usually concern impaired formation of new memories during intoxication, whereas fugue is classified under dissociative autobiographical amnesia with characteristic travel or identity disturbance. Both require attention to possible medical and substance-related causes.
Can a brain scan confirm dissociative fugue?
No. MRI and other investigations can help evaluate competing diagnoses, but there is no established imaging pattern that confirms fugue. Normal imaging alone is not a psychiatric diagnosis.
Is a fugue episode proof of dissociative identity disorder?
No. DID has its own diagnostic criteria involving identity disruption and memory discontinuity. A single episode of travel with a memory gap is insufficient to establish DID.
Should someone try hypnosis to recover missing memories?
Memory-focused procedures carry suggestibility and false-memory risks, and their historical use does not establish their reliability. Discuss any proposed technique, its evidence, consent implications, and alternatives with a qualified specialist. Recovery does not depend on forcing a complete narrative.
Can a dissociative fugue happen again?
Recurrence is reported, but high-quality population estimates are lacking. Follow-up evaluation considers any new episodes, co-occurring conditions, psychosocial stress and whether neurological diagnoses need additional investigation.
When is immediate medical help needed?
Seek emergency evaluation for new unexplained acute memory loss, particularly alongside new weakness, speech changes, seizure-like activity, head injury, severe headache, reduced consciousness, marked intoxication, or inability to remain safe. Sudden amnesia cannot safely be classified from symptoms described online.
Clinical Perspective: What a Responsible Assessment Establishes
A sound evaluation separates confirmed observable events from unverified recollections, identifies the actual pattern of autobiographical memory impairment, and addresses medical emergencies and diagnostic alternatives before a dissociative conclusion is reached. It also explains to the patient what is known, what remains uncertain, and what follow-up is planned. For fugue, the most clinically useful outcome may be restoration of safety, daily functioning, and continuity of care while remaining memory questions are handled without suggestion or pressure.
This article offers general educational information and does not perform individual diagnosis. New unexplained amnesia warrants professional assessment; suspected acute neurological illness or immediate danger warrants emergency services.
Related Articles
Trauma and Memory: Intrusive Memories, Gaps, and Evidence — the wider scientific evidence on trauma-related memory phenomena and limitations of recollection.
Childhood Trauma and Dissociation: What Is the Connection? — a distinct developmental and childhood-trauma search intent.
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment — PTSD assessment and treatment, under its separate canonical owner.
Neurosis vs Dissociation: Historical Concepts and Modern Diagnostic Categories — historical terminology and modern classifications.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Baker, J., Savage, S., Milton, F., Butler, C., Kapur, N., Hodges, J., & Zeman, A. (2021). The syndrome of transient epileptic amnesia: A combined series of 115 cases and literature review. Brain Communications, 3(2), fcab038. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab038.
Cleveland Clinic. (2022). Dissociative fugue: What it is, causes, symptoms and treatment.
German Society of Neurology. (2023). Guideline: Transient Global Amnesia. Neurological Research and Practice. DOI: 10.1186/s42466-023-00240-0.
Griffiths, T. A., Dimitrova, L. I., Linington, M., Terhune, D. B., & Reinders, A. A. T. S. (2025). Effectiveness of phase-oriented treatment for trauma-related dissociative disorders: A systematic review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 16(1), 2545734. DOI: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2545734.
Harrison, N. A., Johnston, K., Corno, F., Casey, S. J., Friedner, K., Humphreys, K., Jaldow, E. J., Pitkanen, M., & Kopelman, M. D. (2017). Psychogenic amnesia: Syndromes, outcome, and patterns of retrograde amnesia. Brain, 140(9), 2498–2510. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awx186.
Hennig-Fast, K., Meister, F., Frodl, T., Beraldi, A., Padberg, F., Engel, R. R., Reiser, M., Möller, H.-J., & Meindl, T. (2008). A case of persistent retrograde amnesia following a dissociative fugue. Neuropsychologia, 46(12), 2993–3005. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.014.
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1997). Hypnosis, memory and amnesia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 352(1362), 1727–1732. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0155.
Krackow, E., Rashed, J., & Thompson, I. (2025). Does hypnosis aid memory retrieval? A review of Steven Jay Lynn's research. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 73(3), 381–390. DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2025.2508410.
Merck Manual Professional Edition. (2025). Dissociative amnesia.
Miller, T. D., & Butler, C. R. (2022). Acute-onset amnesia: Transient global amnesia and other causes. Practical Neurology, 22(3), 201–208. DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2020-002826.
Sealy, D., Tiller, R. J., & Johnson, K. (2022). Transient global amnesia. American Family Physician, 105(1), 50–54.
Spiegel, D., Lewis-Fernández, R., Lanius, R., Vermetten, E., Simeon, D., & Friedman, M. (2011). Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28(12), E17–E45. DOI: 10.1002/da.20923.
Staniloiu, A., Markowitsch, H. J., & Kordon, A. (2018). Psychological causes of autobiographical amnesia: A study of 28 cases. Neuropsychologia, 110, 134–147. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.017.
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. WHO. ISBN 9789240077263.