Disordered Eating: Signs, Examples, and When to Seek Help
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 10, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Eating Disorders & Disordered Eating · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Disordered eating describes patterns of eating-related thoughts and behaviors that become rigid, distressing, unsafe, or disruptive to everyday life. Examples include repeatedly avoiding meals because of food rules, intense anxiety after eating, episodes of feeling unable to control eating, compensatory exercise driven by guilt, and growing restrictions around what feels permissible to eat. A person may experience these problems without meeting the formal criteria for a particular eating disorder. Clinical concern depends on the pattern, its function, its consequences, and the person's health—not on appearance or a single number.
The practical answer is straightforward: seek professional advice when eating rules, avoidance, loss of control, or efforts to compensate for eating are persistent, frightening, medically concerning, or beginning to govern daily life. Severe weakness, fainting, chest pain, possible dehydration, serious purging complications, or acute suicide risk require urgent medical or crisis evaluation. Early assessment is appropriate even when weight has not changed. The NICE eating-disorder guideline and the American Psychiatric Association practice guideline recommend taking behavior, physical health, mental health, and functional impairment seriously from the outset.
What Is Disordered Eating?
Disordered eating is a descriptive clinical and public-health phrase for problematic eating attitudes and behaviors. It is not itself a named DSM-5-TR or ICD diagnostic category. Researchers and clinicians use the phrase in different ways: sometimes for clinically significant symptoms below a particular diagnostic threshold, sometimes for unhealthy food-control behavior, and sometimes for a broad range of eating pathology that may include people with diagnosed conditions. A study reporting 'disordered eating' therefore may be measuring questionnaire symptoms rather than a confirmed psychiatric disorder.
The distinction matters because there is no universal diagnostic checklist for the phrase. Someone can have substantial distress or medical risk before a formal diagnosis is established. Someone else may report a single unusual behavior without having an enduring condition. The Australian Institute of Sport describes problematic eating along a spectrum of eating behavior, while acknowledging the need to assess the actual person and the risks present: AIS explanation of disordered eating.
Eating disorders are defined clinical syndromes, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), and other specified or unspecified feeding or eating disorders. They require condition-specific evaluation. NIMH's overview describes how these illnesses can affect people across ages, genders, and body sizes.
Common Examples of Disordered Eating
The same visible action can have different meanings depending on medical needs, culture, access to food, personal preference, religion, disability, and the person's relationship with eating. The examples below are potential warning patterns, not stand-alone diagnostic criteria. They become especially concerning when combined with fear, compulsion, distress, concealment, physical symptoms, or interference with daily activities.
Rigid rules and escalating restriction
A person may feel that only a narrow list of foods is acceptable, experience significant distress when a planned meal changes, avoid shared meals because they cannot control ingredients, or repeatedly ignore hunger in order to obey a self-imposed rule. Rules may begin as a health project and expand until eating requires elaborate planning. Restriction can also occur without a wish to lose weight, as in some sensory, appetite, or fear-based presentations.
Cycles of restriction and perceived loss of control
Someone may repeatedly try to compensate for earlier eating, feel driven to eat after prolonged restriction, and then react with guilt and further restriction. The experience of losing control is clinically important even when an episode does not meet the size or frequency requirements used in a specific diagnosis. A single large meal, celebration, or ordinary appetite variation is not equivalent to a binge-eating disorder.
Eating secretly and feeling intense shame
A person may hide food-related behaviors or avoid eating with others because they anticipate criticism, anxiety, or embarrassment. Secrecy may be associated with binge episodes, fear of judgment, culturally stigmatized foods, or other difficulties. Privacy alone does not establish pathology; concern increases when shame and concealment make ordinary relationships and help-seeking difficult.
Compensating for food through exercise or other behaviors
Exercise becomes a warning sign when someone feels compelled to do it as punishment for eating, continues despite illness or injury, or cannot tolerate rest because of anxiety about food or body changes. Deliberate vomiting, misuse of medications for weight control, and other purging behaviors are medically concerning and warrant assessment even if episodes are infrequent. The APA guideline specifically includes compensatory and medication-related behaviors in a comprehensive eating-disorder evaluation.
Obsessive attention to food, body shape, or 'clean' eating
Food decisions may occupy hours of mental attention, provoke panic when a rule is broken, or increasingly determine self-worth. Some people become preoccupied with ingredients, purity, or perceived healthfulness. Orthorexia is a proposed construct used for certain problematic healthy-eating obsessions; it is not a separate DSM-5-TR diagnosis. The relevant clinical questions are about impairment, nutritional adequacy, distress, and the possibility of a recognized eating disorder or another condition.
Avoidance related to texture, swallowing fears, or low interest in eating
Some people eat a very restricted range of foods because of sensory characteristics, fear of choking or vomiting, or limited interest in eating rather than concern about weight or shape. When avoidance causes nutritional deficiency, impaired growth, significant weight loss, reliance on supplemental feeding, or marked social interference, clinicians consider ARFID and investigate possible medical or swallowing conditions. Ordinary preferences and culturally familiar restrictions require contextual evaluation.
Using food patterns to manage difficult feelings
Eating more or less than usual during stress is common. Concern arises when food behavior becomes a repetitive, distressing way of handling fear, sadness, numbness, or interpersonal conflict and undermines health or functioning. Emotional eating alone does not establish an eating disorder, and an explanation focused only on emotion may overlook hunger, malnutrition, medications, trauma, and medical illness.
Signs: What May Change in Everyday Life?
Behavioral and social changes
Possible signs include a narrowing food repertoire; repeated avoidance of shared meals; inflexible timing rituals; intense reactions to unexpected food; hiding or minimizing concerning behaviors; avoiding travel or celebrations because food cannot be controlled; and exercise that overrides injury or recovery needs. Friends or family may first notice withdrawal, a sharp change in routines, or conflict around eating rather than a conspicuous change in body size. These features are consistent with the assessment domains described by NICE and AAP guidance for children and adolescents.
Thoughts and emotions
Common experiences include persistent worry about eating, shame after meals, a sense that self-worth depends on dietary compliance, intrusive preoccupation with food, all-or-nothing judgments, fear of certain sensations, and escalating anxiety when a rule cannot be followed. Such thoughts can overlap with anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The difference is assessed through what the thought means, what the behavior achieves, and whether there are independent obsessions or compulsions. Our OCD versus eating disorders guide explores that differential in depth.
Physical warning signs
Possible effects of inadequate intake or purging include dizziness, fainting, unusual fatigue, feeling persistently cold, constipation, dehydration, palpitations, altered menstrual or other hormonal functioning, dental problems, reduced concentration, and disrupted growth or puberty in young people. None is specific enough to diagnose an eating disorder on its own. A medical condition may cause the symptom, an eating problem may cause it, or both may be present. The Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine position paper emphasizes that restrictive disorders can have serious medical consequences even when the presentation does not fit stereotypical expectations about weight.
How Is Disordered Eating Different From an Eating Disorder?
The phrase 'disordered eating' refers to behaviors and experiences, while an eating-disorder diagnosis identifies a clinical syndrome using established criteria and a professional assessment. A diagnosis considers the nature and pattern of symptoms, their duration or frequency where relevant, associated beliefs or fears, impairment, medical effects, and possible alternative explanations. It is not determined simply by whether someone diets, skips a meal, eats more than usual, or has concerns about their appearance.
This distinction does not mean that 'subthreshold' symptoms are harmless. Some people with clinically serious impairment meet criteria for other specified feeding or eating disorder (OSFED). Others have evolving symptoms, medical consequences, or significant distress requiring attention while clinicians clarify the diagnosis. A dimensional description should never become an excuse to postpone necessary care.
Anorexia nervosa and atypical anorexia nervosa
Anorexia nervosa includes sustained restriction leading to significantly low weight in the context of associated weight-related fear or behaviors and/or disturbed recognition or experience of body weight or shape. Atypical anorexia nervosa, classified within OSFED, involves the central anorexia-related pattern after significant weight loss without meeting the low-weight criterion. Rapid weight change and malnutrition can carry major risk at many body sizes. SAHM explicitly describes serious complications in atypical anorexia.
Bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder
Bulimia nervosa includes recurrent binge-eating episodes and recurrent inappropriate compensatory behaviors, together with condition-specific diagnostic features. Binge-eating disorder involves recurrent distressing binge episodes without the recurrent compensatory pattern defining bulimia. Both require assessment of loss of control and diagnostic frequency or duration requirements. Ordinary overeating, an irregular eating day, or distress following one meal is not enough to determine either diagnosis. See the NIMH clinical overview.
ARFID, OSFED, UFED, pica, and rumination disorder
ARFID centers on restriction or avoidance with significant nutritional or psychosocial consequences and without the weight- or shape-driven motivation characteristic of anorexia nervosa. OSFED covers specified clinically significant presentations that do not meet every criterion for another named disorder; UFED applies when full criteria are not met or specified in the available clinical information. Pica involves persistent ingestion of nonfood substances in a context where that behavior is developmentally inappropriate and not culturally sanctioned. Rumination disorder involves repeated regurgitation not better explained by a relevant gastrointestinal condition. These distinctions require individual evaluation and, when necessary, medical investigation.
Orthorexia and other emerging labels
Terms such as orthorexia and informal labels for particular food patterns may describe real distress, but descriptive popularity does not turn them into established diagnostic categories. Clinicians instead determine whether recognized criteria apply, whether eating is adequately supporting health, and what functional problem needs treatment. The same principle applies to 'food addiction' language and social-media labels whose definitions and evidence vary.
Is It Just Dieting, Healthy Eating, or a Medical Diet?
A behavior's meaning depends on its purpose, flexibility, context, and consequences. Eating differently for a verified allergy, coeliac disease, religious observance, sensory accessibility, ethical preference, or a clinician-guided medical condition may be necessary and compatible with psychological well-being. The presence of a plan or preference is not sufficient to classify the person as disordered.
Warning signs arise when rules spread far beyond the original purpose, ordinary variations trigger intense fear, nutritional adequacy suffers, care is avoided, or the routine causes substantial social and emotional restriction. People managing diabetes, gastrointestinal illness, food insecurity, or complex medical diets deserve integrated assessment that respects the actual medical need. Professionals should avoid assuming that every restriction is weight motivated or that medically prescribed limitations cannot coexist with an eating disorder.
Why Does Disordered Eating Develop?
There is no single pathway. Vulnerabilities and maintaining conditions can include genetic liability, temperament, anxiety, perfectionism, experiences of criticism or bullying, stressful transitions, traumatic events, restrictive dieting, sport environments, social messages about body size, and access to health care and adequate food. These factors can interact; an association observed in a study does not prove that a particular experience caused a particular person's symptoms. The NIMH summary describes genetic, biological, behavioral, psychological, and social contributions to eating disorders.
Body image may be one important component, although some disordered eating and ARFID presentations are not driven by appearance. The Social Media and Body Image article addresses the separate general question of appearance comparison. Personality research also identifies associations that do not function as diagnostic rules, discussed in Neuroticism and Eating Disorders.
How rigid patterns can sustain themselves
Restriction may heighten hunger and food-related attention; anxiety can make avoidance feel briefly relieving; rules can become associated with safety or moral worth; and secrecy can reduce opportunities for corrective support. These are plausible, clinically recognized maintaining pathways, but they do not operate identically for every individual or disorder. In some presentations sensory distress, medical symptoms, trauma-related reactions, or a history of aversive food experiences are more relevant than body image.
A clinician's formulation asks which mechanisms are actually present rather than assigning a universal story. The APA guideline recommends examining changes in food intake, avoidance, binge eating, compensatory behavior, preoccupation, and psychosocial impairment alongside medical and psychiatric health.
Who Can Experience Disordered Eating?
People of every gender, age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and body size may experience disordered eating. It may be overlooked in boys and men, older adults, people in larger bodies, and people whose behaviors are described as disciplined or healthy. Transgender and gender-diverse people may have additional body-related or minority-stress concerns; no single explanatory model applies to everyone. A respectful assessment considers the person's cultural and developmental context, language, access to food, and relevant disabilities rather than relying on stereotypes.
Children and adolescents
Young people may present through irritability, avoidance of family meals, sudden rigidity, reduced concentration, a change in growth trajectory, delayed puberty, or exercise-related distress. Parents and pediatricians should consider development over time, not only whether a current weight falls inside a broad population range. The AAP clinical report recommends screening for concerning eating and weight-control behaviors and evaluating growth and vital signs.
Athletes, dancers, and highly active people
Training environments may normalize restrictive practices or override signals of inadequate fueling. Low energy availability, bone injury, hormonal changes, repeated illness, and driven exercise deserve qualified sports-medical evaluation. These complications can occur even without a diagnosed eating disorder. The AIS–NEDC position statement addresses recognition and multidisciplinary care in sport; findings in elite athletes should not automatically be generalized to the entire population.
Autistic people and people with sensory or feeding difficulties
Sensory sensitivities, predictability needs, interoceptive differences, and anxiety around food can shape eating. Clinicians should investigate nutritional and functional consequences while distinguishing food selectivity from ARFID, gastrointestinal disorders, and restrictive behavior motivated by weight or shape. Neurodivergence alone does not establish an eating disorder; conversely, a sensory explanation should not prevent medical monitoring when intake is insufficient.
When Should Someone Seek Professional Help?
A conversation with a clinician is warranted when eating feels increasingly controlled by fear or shame, behaviors are becoming more restrictive or compulsive, social situations are avoided, episodes of loss of control recur, compensatory behavior appears, food choices are substantially narrowing, or eating-related concerns interfere with school, work, relationships, growth, or physical health. A person does not have to wait for severe weight loss, a screening score, or complete diagnostic criteria. NICE recommends early assessment and prompt referral when an eating disorder is suspected.
Arrange a timely primary-care or eating-disorder-specialist evaluation if you notice ongoing restriction, unexplained weight or growth changes, menstrual or other endocrine changes, fatigue, faintness, palpitations, purging behavior, or significant psychological distress. For children and adolescents, involve a pediatric clinician promptly when growth, participation, or eating variety deteriorates. When access to a specialist is limited, primary care can begin the medical and psychiatric evaluation and coordinate referrals.
When is help urgent or an emergency?
Seek emergency care for fainting with concerning symptoms, chest pain, serious palpitations, confusion, seizures, marked dehydration, blood in vomit, severe weakness, or other signs of acute instability. Repeated vomiting, purging behavior, rapid deterioration, and severe restriction require urgent professional judgment about electrolytes, circulation, and cardiac risk. If there is immediate danger from suicidal thoughts or actions, contact emergency services or an available crisis service in your country. In the United States, call or text 988 for suicide and mental-health crisis support; call 911 for an immediate medical emergency. Medical severity must be assessed by a clinician, and people with significant restriction may need supervised nutritional rehabilitation.
Guidelines explicitly reject a single BMI cutoff as the basis for deciding whether someone requires treatment or a higher level of care. NICE recommends evaluation of current deterioration, blood tests, vital signs, ECG findings where relevant, and other clinical risks. The SAHM position paper emphasizes medical instability across restrictive presentations, including atypical anorexia nervosa.
What Happens During an Assessment?
An appropriate evaluation begins with a confidential, nonjudgmental conversation. A clinician asks about the course of eating patterns; possible food avoidance, binge episodes, or compensatory behaviors; physical symptoms; growth and weight history where relevant; cultural and medical dietary needs; changes in functioning; mental health; medications; and family or social context. The clinician may assess vital signs and order tests according to the history and level of concern. For children and adolescents, growth trajectories and caregiver observations may be especially important.
The APA practice guideline recommends examining physical health, psychiatric comorbidity, nutritional status, and eating-related behavior, with laboratory evaluation and ECG when indicated. If a medical or gastrointestinal condition could explain symptoms, it must be considered. Assessment can involve a physician, mental-health specialist, and registered dietitian with eating-disorder expertise. The precise team depends on the patient's needs, age, and available services.
What about the SCOFF test or an online quiz?
Screening questionnaires can flag the need for further assessment but cannot establish or exclude a diagnosis by themselves. The SCOFF has been studied most extensively for anorexia- and bulimia-related symptoms, with limitations for other diagnoses and diverse populations. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 studies found important differences across study designs and samples. NICE specifically advises against using screening tools as the sole determinant of whether someone has an eating disorder. A negative score cannot replace clinical assessment when concerning behaviors or medical signs are present.
What Treatments and Support Can Help?
Treatment is matched to the actual diagnosis or presenting problems, medical needs, age, and severity. When an eating disorder is present, evidence-based care can include structured eating-disorder-focused psychotherapy, nutritional rehabilitation, medical monitoring, and family involvement where appropriate. Different methods have different indications. Care for an adult with binge-eating disorder is not automatically interchangeable with care for a young person with restrictive anorexia or a child with ARFID.
Eating-disorder-focused psychotherapy
Specialized cognitive behavioral treatment is an established option for several eating-disorder presentations, with adaptations and evidence varying by diagnosis and age. Adult binge-eating disorder may be treated with disorder-focused guided self-help or CBT-based therapy. For bulimia nervosa, guided self-help and eating-disorder-focused CBT have guideline support. Adult anorexia nervosa treatment requires diagnosis-specific psychotherapy alongside attention to nutritional and physical recovery. NICE treatment recommendations distinguish these approaches rather than applying one generic treatment to everyone.
Family and developmental care
For children and adolescents, medical monitoring and developmentally appropriate family involvement are often central. Certain family-based treatments have evidence and guideline support for specific eating disorders, particularly adolescent anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Families should be supported in understanding symptoms and participating without blame. The AAP report describes collaborative, developmentally responsive care.
Nutrition support and medical treatment
A qualified clinician or eating-disorder-informed dietitian can help address inadequate intake, nutritional deficiencies, rigid rules, and sustainable eating patterns. Some patients need coordinated medical care for cardiac, gastrointestinal, endocrine, electrolyte, or bone-health complications. People who have been severely undernourished require a supervised plan because nutritional restoration itself can pose medical risks. Medication has diagnosis-specific roles and is not a universal treatment for disordered eating. APA and NICE provide detailed recommendations.
When a formal diagnosis is not established
Support may still be appropriate for persistent distressing symptoms. A clinician can investigate medical causes, reduce immediate risk, assess for emerging disorders, and decide whether focused psychological or nutritional intervention is indicated. The evidence base is strongest for defined clinical treatments and populations; it is less precise for every possible pattern labeled 'disordered eating.' Outcomes should therefore be evaluated in terms of actual behavior, distress, functioning, nutrition, and safety.
What Can You Do While Arranging Help?
Start by speaking to a trusted health professional about specific behaviors and changes you have noticed, even if you feel uncertain about the label. Describe what has become hard: eating with others, choosing a meal, stopping a ritual, tolerating changes in plans, or recovering from exercise. Mention physical symptoms, medications, and any compensatory behavior plainly. You can ask for a private and respectful appointment and, if helpful, bring someone you trust.
Prioritize medical advice when restriction, purging, fainting, or other physical warning signs are present. For everyday support, reduce exposure to content that intensifies food shame or compulsive comparison, seek company around meals when it feels supportive, and identify situations where rules have displaced important activities. Avoid attempting severe dietary changes, purging cessation plans with significant medical complications, or unsupervised refeeding after substantial undernutrition without appropriate clinical support.
It is useful to describe patterns in ordinary language—'I have become afraid to eat with people' or 'I feel compelled to exercise after meals'—rather than trying to qualify for a diagnostic label before contacting a clinician. Early support is a practical response to distress and risk.
How to Support a Friend, Partner, or Family Member
Approach the person privately and describe observed changes without commenting on their weight, attractiveness, or moral character. Ask about distress and functioning: 'I've noticed meals have become stressful and you're avoiding plans we used to enjoy. How has eating been feeling lately?' Listen to the answer, acknowledge how difficult it may be to discuss, and suggest a qualified evaluation. Avoid debating calories, praising weight changes, giving unsolicited diet instructions, or threatening exposure as a first response.
For a child or adolescent, caregivers can work with pediatric professionals to assess growth, physical signs, and safe care needs rather than relying only on the young person's reassurance. If acute medical or suicide risk is present, seek urgent help even when the person is reluctant. Families benefit from their own guidance and support; blame does not advance assessment or treatment.
Recovery: What Does Improvement Look Like?
Improvement may involve greater flexibility with food, reduced preoccupation, fewer compulsive or compensatory behaviors, more reliable nutrition, restoration of safe physical functioning, and renewed participation in relationships, school, work, and meaningful activities. Recovery is individualized and can include setbacks. A person's weight alone does not capture psychological improvement or medical recovery, although weight restoration is an essential treatment goal in specific malnourished restrictive disorders.
Follow-up should address remaining distress, co-occurring anxiety or depression, ongoing physical complications, and the practical circumstances that make eating difficult. A planned transition between clinicians, services, or age-specific care settings can help maintain continuity. NICE recommends coordinated care and follow-up adapted to the disorder and the individual.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you have disordered eating without an eating disorder?
Yes. The phrase can describe concerning eating-related symptoms without a confirmed categorical diagnosis. Some people have subthreshold symptoms, some have a different medical or psychological explanation, and some meet criteria for a diagnosable eating disorder after proper evaluation. Distress and physical risk warrant attention regardless of the label.
Does disordered eating always turn into an eating disorder?
No. Trajectories vary, and population associations do not predict an individual's course. Persistent restriction, recurrent loss of control, purging, or escalating rigidity justify assessment because symptoms may intensify and can cause harm on their own.
Can someone have serious problems at a normal or higher weight?
Yes. Restriction, rapid weight change, malnutrition, purging, and cardiovascular or electrolyte problems can occur across body sizes. Clinical evaluation considers symptoms, history, vital signs, laboratory findings, growth, and overall health, not appearance alone. See SAHM and NICE.
Is skipping meals always disordered eating?
An isolated skipped meal does not establish a disorder. Context, repetition, underlying motivation, nutritional adequacy, physical symptoms, and impairment determine whether an ongoing pattern needs assessment.
Is eating when stressed a symptom of an eating disorder?
Not by itself. Stress can alter appetite and eating in many people. Recurring distress, a sense of lost control, associated restriction or compensatory behaviors, and functional consequences may make professional evaluation useful.
Is binge eating the same as overeating?
No. Clinically defined binge eating involves a distinct loss-of-control experience and other features assessed in context. An unusually large meal alone does not establish a binge episode or binge-eating disorder.
Can 'healthy eating' become unhealthy?
Yes, when rules produce significant distress, nutritional deficits, social withdrawal, or compulsive behavior. The evaluation should respect medically necessary diets and cultural practices. 'Orthorexia' describes a proposed construct, not a DSM-5-TR diagnosis.
Is ARFID caused by body-image concerns?
ARFID is defined by avoidant or restrictive eating with significant consequences without weight- or shape-driven concerns as the primary motivation for restriction. Sensory characteristics, low interest, or fear of aversive consequences may be involved. Medical differential diagnosis remains essential.
Can anxiety or OCD cause food rituals?
Anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms can interact with eating, and conditions can co-occur. A clinician assesses whether rituals are part of an eating disorder, OCD, another anxiety presentation, or several conditions. See OCD and Eating Disorders: What Is the Connection?.
Can children have disordered eating without weight loss?
Yes. Changes in growth velocity, pubertal development, food variety, functioning, and distress may be warning signs. Pediatric assessment uses developmental history rather than adult appearance-based assumptions. The AAP report provides the clinical context.
Should I take an online eating-disorder quiz before asking for help?
A quiz is optional and cannot replace care. If symptoms or medical concerns are affecting your life, contact a clinician regardless of an online score. Screening tools have limitations and cannot confirm a diagnosis.
Who should I contact first?
A primary-care clinician or pediatrician can evaluate health risks and coordinate referrals. An eating-disorder specialist or appropriately trained mental-health clinician may provide further assessment, while a registered dietitian with relevant expertise supports nutritional care. Urgent medical symptoms require emergency evaluation.
Related Articles
OCD vs Eating Disorders: Food Rules, Rituals, Body Concerns, and Obsessions — distinguish overlapping rituals, avoidant behavior, and diagnostic mechanisms.
OCD and Eating Disorders: Intrusive Thoughts, Comorbidity, and Treatment — understand when two syndromes may coexist.
Social Media and Body Image: Appearance Comparison, Ideals, and Mental Health — explore the separate body-image and comparison literature.
Neuroticism and Eating Disorders: Trait Associations and Clinical Limits — review personality associations without diagnostic overreach.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2023). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with eating disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(2), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.23180001.
Australian Institute of Sport. (n.d.). What is disordered eating? Australian Sports Commission. Official resource.
Hornberger, L. L., & Lane, M. A. (2021). Identification and management of eating disorders in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 147(1), e2020040279. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-040279.
Kutz, A. M., Marsh, A. G., Gunderson, C. G., Maguen, S., & Masheb, R. M. (2020). Eating disorder screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test characteristics of the SCOFF. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35, 885–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05478-6.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2017; current online recommendations). Eating disorders: Recognition and treatment (NG69). Official guideline.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Eating disorders: What you need to know. Official publication.
Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. (2022). Medical management of restrictive eating disorders in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 71(5), 648–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.08.006.
Wells, K. R., Jeacocke, N. A., Appaneal, R., Smith, H. D., Vlahovich, N., Burke, L. M., & Hughes, D. (2020). The Australian Institute of Sport (AIS) and National Eating Disorders Collaboration (NEDC) position statement on disordered eating in high performance sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(21), 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101813.