Depersonalization vs Derealization: What Is the Difference?
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Dissociation & Dissociative Disorders · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Depersonalization and derealization are related experiences of detachment with different points of reference. Depersonalization means feeling disconnected from yourself—your body, thoughts, emotions, actions, or immediate sense of being you. Derealization means feeling disconnected from your surroundings—people, places, and objects may seem strangely distant, artificial, dreamlike, or unfamiliar. Both experiences may occur at the same time. Their occurrence does not automatically mean that someone has a psychiatric disorder. For a related clinical perspective, see Depersonalization-Derealization Disorder: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
The central distinction is what feels unreal: the self in depersonalization, the external world in derealization. The relevant clinical questions are how long the sensations last, how distressing or disruptive they become, whether the person knows the sensations do not reflect a literal change in reality, and whether another medical or psychiatric condition explains them. The DSM-5-TR dissociative disorders chapter and WHO ICD-11 clinical descriptions provide the contemporary classification context.
Depersonalization vs derealization: the essential distinction
Depersonalization concerns the person's relationship to their own experience. They might say, “I feel like I am watching myself live my life,” “I move and speak normally but feel on autopilot,” or “I know these are my emotions, but I cannot feel connected to them.” Such descriptions often involve a changed sense of self-presence, bodily familiarity, emotional immediacy, or personal ownership.
Derealization concerns the person's relationship to the outside world. They might say, “The street looks like a film set,” “The room seems very far away,” or “I recognize my family, yet they feel oddly unfamiliar.” Such descriptions often involve altered felt familiarity, distance, vividness, depth, or a dreamlike quality in the environment.
Both forms of detachment can occur together. They are frequently studied within one clinical syndrome, and the American Psychiatric Association's classification review explains why DSM-5 brought derealization into the depersonalization-derealization diagnosis. Their overlap does not erase the descriptive difference. Knowing which sensations concern the self and which concern the environment helps people communicate with clinicians more precisely.
A useful example is a person walking through a familiar shopping center. If they recognize the shops but feel as though their own movements are being performed by somebody else, depersonalization describes the self-focused component. If their movements feel ordinary but the shops, voices, and people appear dreamlike or distant, derealization describes the environmental component. If both occur, the person may report both terms. These are illustrative descriptions rather than diagnostic tests.
What depersonalization feels like
Depersonalization can involve a loss of ordinary closeness to one's thoughts, emotions, actions, or body without loss of identity knowledge. A person may know their name, recognize their body, remember their activities, and understand their circumstances, yet feel strangely absent from their own life. Some call the experience robotic, automatic, detached, or similar to watching themselves through a screen.
For some people, emotional numbing is the most distressing feature. They know that they love someone or care about an event but cannot access the usual feeling of connection. Others experience changes in the felt ownership of movement or speech, a sense that their body looks unfamiliar in the mirror, or a subjective distance from autobiographical memories. The Merck Manual Professional describes emotional and bodily detachment, altered emotional responsiveness, and a sensation of observing oneself from outside.
The phrase “out-of-body experience” can be used figuratively. Many people mean that their body no longer feels fully integrated with their ordinary first-person perspective. That wording does not establish that the individual literally sees themselves from another physical position or is having a hallucination. Clinicians clarify the experience rather than drawing conclusions from a metaphor.
Memory can also feel emotionally remote without being lost. Remembering a conversation while feeling that it happened to someone else differs from being unable to recall significant autobiographical information. The latter may require assessment for dissociative amnesia, neurological causes, substances, or other explanations. Research on the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale has helped characterize the diverse phenomenology of self-detachment rather than reducing it to a single sensation.
What derealization feels like
Derealization changes the felt reality or familiarity of surroundings. A room may appear recognizable but strangely theatrical; colors may seem flat or unusually intense; familiar people may feel distant; sounds may seem muffled or unusually prominent. Some report that objects appear smaller, larger, flatter, or spatially remote. Others experience little obvious visual distortion but an unsettling absence of ordinary environmental presence.
The Merck clinical description includes dreamlike, foggy, lifeless, artificial, or distorted perceptions of surroundings. The environment may feel separated from the person by an invisible wall. Time may seem to pass too slowly or rapidly.
A person experiencing derealization usually continues to recognize where they are and who the people around them are. The distress arises partly from the mismatch between factual recognition and felt familiarity. They know their home is their home, but it no longer feels familiar. That discrepancy can prompt repeated checking, anxiety, and fear of “losing touch.”
Derealization does not imply that the visual system is necessarily damaged. It also does not explain every new visual symptom. Sudden vision loss, double vision, severe headache, altered consciousness, or focal neurological changes require separate medical assessment. The distinction between changed perceptual feeling and a medically significant sensory disturbance is particularly important in an article that readers may use to interpret unfamiliar symptoms.
Why depersonalization and derealization often coexist
The ordinary sense of being present depends on integration across bodily awareness, emotion, attention, memory, and perceptions of surroundings. Self and environment are related aspects of experience. When that integration changes, an individual may perceive detachment from the body and from the world at once. Another person may experience only one element, or may shift between the two over time.
The diagnostic grouping reflects this overlap. Simeon's clinical synthesis explains that research has not established two discrete independent disorders corresponding neatly to the two experiences. The DSM-5-TR requires either depersonalization, derealization, or both when considering the combined diagnosis.
The grouping is useful for diagnostic organization, while the distinction remains useful for clinical description. A patient may describe a predominantly self-focused experience one month and predominantly environmental detachment another month. Such changes do not automatically mean that a new disorder has developed.
Feeling unreal and knowing what is real
Reality testing is a key clinical concept. A person with a characteristic depersonalization or derealization experience can say that the world or self feels unreal while recognizing that this is a subjective sensation. They know their body exists, their surroundings remain physically present, and their experience does not mean the world has literally transformed.
Preserved reality testing is part of the formal DSM-5-TR criteria for depersonalization-derealization disorder. The statement “It feels like a dream, but I know it is real” is therefore clinically informative. However, a phrase taken out of context cannot determine a diagnosis.
The distinction matters when considering psychotic symptoms. Delusions, hallucinations, disorganization, degree of conviction, and insight need careful examination. People with psychotic disorders vary in insight, and more than one condition may be present. A clinician asks what the person means by “unreal,” whether the belief is held literally, and what other symptoms occur. It is inappropriate to label every unusual perception psychosis or assume that any retained insight definitively excludes every psychotic condition.
Are these symptoms always forms of dissociation?
Depersonalization and derealization are commonly categorized as dissociative experiences involving detachment. Dissociation is broader: different phenomena can involve changes in perception, self-experience, memory, and identity. The official DSM-5-TR dissociative disorders chapter includes depersonalization-derealization disorder, dissociative identity disorder, dissociative amnesia, and specified or unspecified dissociative disorders.
A feeling of self-detachment is not equivalent to dissociative identity disorder (DID). DID requires a different pattern of identity disruption and recurrent memory gaps, evaluated in a structured clinical context. Derealization is also distinct from dissociative amnesia, which concerns difficulties recalling autobiographical information. Feeling that a memory lacks emotional familiarity differs from being unable to retrieve it.
Detachment experiences can also arise in conditions classified outside the dissociative-disorders group. The presence of a symptom does not establish that the primary diagnosis is a dissociative disorder. A clinical science review of dissociation models emphasizes the complexity of the construct and the need to consider interacting psychological systems and alternative explanations.
What causes depersonalization and derealization?
Stress, intense anxiety, panic attacks, and sleep disruption are common contexts. Depersonalization and derealization are also reported alongside depression, PTSD, substance effects, and some neurological conditions. Cannabis and other psychoactive substances can precipitate altered experiences in some people. The Merck Manual Professional identifies stress, anxiety, depression, and psychoactive drugs among relevant precipitating factors.
A personal history of trauma may be clinically relevant, but a dissociative sensation does not establish that trauma caused it. Nor does the presence of an episode provide evidence for a particular forgotten event. Trauma association, individual causal explanation, and the factual accuracy of autobiographical memories are separate questions requiring appropriate evidence.
Some people experience a brief episode during acute fear or exhaustion. Others report symptoms with no clear triggering event. Medical conditions, medication changes, migraine phenomena, seizures, and substance-related effects can be relevant. The onset pattern, associated signs, physical health, sleep history, and the person's environment all influence the assessment.
Can panic trigger both experiences?
Yes. During a panic attack, depersonalization or derealization may appear alongside intense bodily sensations and fear. The person might experience rapid heartbeat, breathlessness, trembling, and a feeling that surroundings are unreal. In that context, the sensation may be part of the panic episode. Recurrent detachment outside panic attacks requires consideration of a broader diagnostic formulation. Anxiety disorders and DPDR may coexist, and one cannot reliably distinguish them from a single isolated symptom.
Can cannabis trigger derealization?
Psychoactive substances, including cannabis, can be associated with depersonalization or derealization. Timing of onset, frequency of use, other substances, and medical circumstances are clinically relevant. If an experience follows substance use, clinicians consider possible substance-induced symptoms before diagnosing a primary depersonalization-derealization disorder. Avoiding further recreational drug exposure while seeking assessment can be appropriate when substance use appears related to symptoms.
What neuroscience tells us about the difference
Researchers investigate emotion regulation, bodily awareness, sensory processing, attention, and the integration of information about self and surroundings. A 2024 systematic review by Millman and colleagues found reduced subjective emotional responsiveness in some experimental studies of depersonalization-derealization disorder and evidence of altered activity in emotion-regulation networks. Findings concerning autonomic responses, social cognition, and emotional memory were mixed. The authors identified methodological complications, including comorbid conditions and medication exposure.
Research on interoception addresses the brain's representation of internal bodily states. Saini and colleagues (2022) proposed a computational model in which reduced access to bodily signals, alongside environmental processing, may help generate a sense of detachment. The model makes hypotheses about possible processes; it does not demonstrate a universal cause or supply a diagnostic test.
It is tempting to imagine that depersonalization occurs exclusively in one brain system and derealization in another. Current evidence does not justify such a simple map. These experiences overlap, measurements are heterogeneous, and many studies involve small clinical samples. No brain scan, blood test, or unique neural signature presently diagnoses one experience instead of the other.
Attention and interpretation also matter. Someone frightened by a sensation of unreality may repeatedly monitor whether the sensation has ended, test whether family members feel familiar, or scan the environment for signs of abnormality. Such checking may contribute to persistent distress in some individuals. Psychological models of symptom maintenance should be regarded as hypotheses about processes and as possible clinical targets, not as explanations of every person's condition.
Common experience versus clinical disorder
Temporary detachment can occur without a mental disorder. Clinical evaluation considers recurrence, persistence, marked distress, functional impairment, preserved reality testing, and competing explanations. In the DSM-5-TR, depersonalization-derealization disorder is considered when either or both sensations persist or recur, reality testing remains intact, clinically significant distress or impairment occurs, and the symptoms are not attributable to substances, a medical condition, or a better-fitting mental disorder.
The World Health Organization's ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements also recognize depersonalization-derealization disorder, classified as 6B66. DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 are independently organized diagnostic systems, with differences in terminology and classification conventions. The relevant clinical distinction in both is between symptom experience and a properly assessed disorder.
Clinical thresholds depend on the whole pattern. A single alarming episode is not equivalent to persistent disorder. Conversely, symptoms can be clinically significant even when the person is still able to describe them insightfully. A clinician considers functioning and distress alongside the type of sensation.
How common is depersonalization-derealization disorder?
Transient sensations are much more common than diagnosed disorder. In a systematic review by Yang and colleagues, 23 studies using standardized diagnostic tools produced estimated prevalence from 0% to 1.9% in general-population samples. Rates were higher in some clinical groups. The review indicates substantial variation across populations, diagnostic instruments, and settings.
These are estimates for specific sampled groups, not a prediction that a person with one brief episode is likely to develop chronic DPDR. Prevalence research also reinforces the importance of distinguishing ordinary transient experience from clinically significant impairment.
How long do depersonalization and derealization last?
Either sensation may last seconds, minutes, hours, or longer. Some people report episodes that recur over weeks, while others experience persistent symptoms with fluctuations in intensity. Duration alone does not determine which label applies: depersonalization and derealization can each be brief or enduring. The Merck Manual Professional describes episodic and prolonged clinical courses.
Clinicians assess onset, recurrence, whether symptoms occur only during panic, changes in medication or substance exposure, functional consequences, and associated neurological or psychiatric symptoms. There is no reliable number of minutes that by itself establishes a dissociative disorder.
How clinicians distinguish DPDR from similar symptoms
Anxiety and panic attacks
Depersonalization or derealization can occur as part of anxiety and panic. A panic attack may involve abrupt fear, rapid heartbeat, trembling, dizziness, breathlessness, and a sense of unreality. Persistent detachment between panic episodes can raise different assessment questions. The sensations are not themselves equivalent to panic disorder.
Psychosis
Feeling that the world is unreal while recognizing that the experience is subjective differs from firmly believing a false proposition about reality. Clinicians evaluate the person's exact meaning, conviction, insight, associated perceptions, thinking, behavior, and medical status. Psychotic disorders and dissociative symptoms can overlap, so simplified online comparisons cannot replace an assessment.
Migraine, seizures, and neurological conditions
Some neurological conditions can generate unfamiliarity, altered perception, or depersonalization-like experiences. New, abrupt, stereotyped episodes; loss of awareness; seizure-like events; severe headaches; focal weakness; or unexplained neurological deficits call for medical evaluation. Depending on findings, appropriate testing might include neurological examination, electroencephalography, imaging, or toxicology. Such tests evaluate alternative explanations; they do not function as a stand-alone test confirming DPDR. Clinical discussions include the organic depersonalization literature.
Depression and emotional blunting
A person with depression may feel emotionally numb, detached, or unable to enjoy activities. DPDR concerns changes in felt self- or environmental reality. Symptoms can coexist; clinicians evaluate mood, motivation, pleasure, detachment, and impairment rather than using “numb” as a complete diagnosis.
ADHD and ordinary zoning out
Ordinary distraction and absorption can reduce awareness of what is happening without creating a strong sense that the self or world is unreal. ADHD involves a developmental pattern of attentional and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms. It should not be inferred from an isolated dissociative sensation or treated as interchangeable with derealization.
PTSD, borderline personality disorder, and other dissociative symptoms
Depersonalization and derealization may occur with PTSD, including its dissociative subtype, and can be reported in other conditions. PTSD, borderline personality disorder, dissociative identity disorder, dissociative amnesia, and functional neurological disorders each have their own clinical assessment requirements. The common presence of dissociative symptoms does not collapse their diagnostic boundaries.
What happens during clinical assessment?
A clinician begins by asking what the sensations feel like in the person's own words. Questions often cover onset, duration, frequency, triggers, awareness of reality, distress, impact on daily life, sleep, medications, substances, relevant psychiatric symptoms, medical conditions, and any neurological warning signs.
The person may be asked to describe whether the main sensation concerns their body or mind, their environment, or both. The clinician then considers panic, depression, psychosis, trauma-related conditions, neurological disorders, intoxication, and other possible explanations. Examinations and investigations should be matched to actual clinical findings.
Structured questionnaires can help capture symptom patterns. The Cambridge Depersonalization Scale assesses frequency and duration of different depersonalization experiences and was studied against clinical comparison groups. A questionnaire result does not establish diagnosis or prove a particular cause. Formal diagnosis requires a qualified clinical evaluation.
A concise description is useful: “For three weeks, familiar rooms have felt strangely distant, but I know they are real. It happens most evenings and makes concentrating difficult.” This communicates timing, phenomenology, preserved reality testing, and functional impact without requiring self-diagnosis.
Are depersonalization and derealization treated differently?
There is no standard evidence-based rule that requires entirely separate treatments for self-detachment and environmental detachment. Treatment planning follows the assessed condition, symptom severity, associated anxiety, depression or panic, sleep, medical factors, substance exposure, and functioning. For clinically significant depersonalization-derealization disorder, psychotherapy and treatment of co-occurring conditions are commonly considered.
The evidence remains limited. Wang and colleagues (2024) systematically reviewed 41 treatment studies comprising only 300 participants, including four randomized controlled trials, one nonrandomized controlled trial, case series, and case reports. The studies varied widely, and overall quality and quantity were generally low. No treatment should be described as a universally established cure.
Psychotherapy
Cognitive-behavioral treatment may address catastrophic interpretations of detachment, repetitive symptom monitoring, avoidance, and associated anxiety. In a small open study by Hunter and colleagues, 21 patients received cognitive-behavioral therapy and showed improvement in several outcomes. Without a randomized comparison group, the study cannot establish the treatment's specific efficacy or predict individual results.
Other clinical approaches may address emotional processing, stress, or co-occurring conditions. They require individualized formulation, monitoring, and careful distinction between theoretical rationale and evidence demonstrated in controlled studies. If trauma-related care is appropriate, the therapist should avoid suggesting that dissociative sensations automatically prove forgotten trauma or that imagery or memories emerging during treatment establish historical events.
Medication
No medication has clear, consistently replicated efficacy as a specific cure for depersonalization-derealization disorder. Clinicians may prescribe medication for independently diagnosed anxiety, depression, or other conditions when indicated. Small studies of direct pharmacologic treatment have produced inconsistent results. In a nine-patient placebo-controlled crossover study, lamotrigine was not significantly better than placebo. A single small negative trial does not settle the entire question, but it also cannot justify routine claims of proven efficacy.
Grounding and day-to-day coping
Grounding techniques aim to orient attention to immediately observable details. Some people find it helpful to name their location, identify neutral objects, notice the contact of their feet on the floor, or speak with a trusted person. Such exercises are coping options rather than diagnostic tests or treatments with clearly demonstrated condition-specific efficacy. If a technique increases distress or intense self-monitoring, the person can use a gentler approach and discuss alternatives with a clinician.
What to do during an episode
Check safety before attempting any technique. If you are driving or using dangerous equipment, stop safely. New neurological signs, confusion, collapse, severe headache, or impaired awareness require appropriate medical evaluation.
When there is no immediate danger and the experience resembles a familiar episode previously assessed, some people benefit from accurately naming the sensation: “This is a feeling of detachment; the sensation alone does not mean that the world has physically changed.” Gently redirecting attention to a routine, externally oriented activity may be more helpful than repeatedly testing whether you feel normal.
Maintain a reasonable sleep routine and consider whether alcohol, recreational substances, major stress, or medication changes may be relevant. Avoid assuming a single cause. After an episode, a short record of duration, associated symptoms, and circumstances may help a clinician identify patterns. The goal is useful information, not continuous self-surveillance.
Seek professional assessment if the sensation becomes persistent, repeated, frightening, or disruptive. Online descriptions and screening tools are valuable for vocabulary but cannot determine the underlying diagnosis.
When depersonalization or derealization needs urgent attention
A sensation of unreality may coexist with an acute medical problem. Seek urgent assessment for new one-sided weakness, severe new headache, loss of consciousness, seizure-like episodes, acute confusion, serious injury, or significant intoxication. Major new changes in behavior or perception accompanied by immediate danger or inability to care for oneself also require prompt evaluation.
For persistent or recurrent experiences that interfere with work, school, or relationships, arrange an appointment with a qualified healthcare professional. Earlier assessment can help identify treatable contributors and avoid relying on an assumed diagnosis. In the United States, call 911 in a medical emergency; elsewhere, use the local emergency number.
Recovery and prognosis
Many brief episodes resolve as the circumstances associated with them change. Persistent depersonalization-derealization disorder may fluctuate or become prolonged. People differ in associated conditions, symptom patterns, access to care, and outcomes. The Merck clinical review describes heterogeneous courses, with recovery possible in some cases and chronic difficulties in others.
No single online description, symptom duration, or questionnaire score reliably predicts recovery for an individual. Improvement can include reduced distress, restored everyday functioning, better management of co-occurring conditions, and less disruption from sensations even before they fully resolve.
Frequently asked questions
What is the simplest difference between depersonalization and derealization?
Depersonalization means feeling detached from yourself. Derealization means feeling detached from your environment. Either can occur alone or with the other.
Can you have derealization without depersonalization?
Yes. A person may experience environmental unreality without significant self-detachment. Both experiences are grouped under one clinical disorder category when the remaining diagnostic criteria are met.
Is feeling like a robot depersonalization?
It can describe depersonalization, especially when actions or emotions feel automatic or personally distant. The phrase alone cannot establish a diagnosis.
Is feeling that everything is a dream derealization?
A dreamlike environment is a common description of derealization. It can occur in several contexts, including panic and sleep disruption, and should be interpreted together with other symptoms.
Can you know that the world is real while it feels unreal?
Yes. Preserved awareness that the sensation is subjective is a characteristic part of depersonalization-derealization disorder in DSM-5-TR. Clinicians still examine the wider presentation.
Does derealization mean psychosis?
No. Derealization is a subjective feeling of environmental unreality. Psychotic symptoms require separate assessment of perceptions, beliefs, thought processes, conviction, and functioning.
Is depersonalization the same as dissociative identity disorder?
No. Depersonalization is one symptom type that can arise in various contexts. Dissociative identity disorder has other diagnostic features, including identity disruption and recurrent gaps in memory.
Can panic attacks cause both sensations?
Yes. Depersonalization and derealization can appear during panic episodes. Persistent symptoms outside such episodes may raise additional assessment questions.
Can sleep deprivation make my surroundings feel unreal?
Sleep loss can accompany or aggravate unusual perceptual and dissociative experiences in some people. A new or severe symptom still requires attention to other potential causes.
Can cannabis cause depersonalization or derealization?
Cannabis and other psychoactive substances can precipitate altered experiences in some users. Clinical assessment considers timing and substance effects before assigning a primary psychiatric diagnosis.
How long does derealization last?
It varies from brief episodes to prolonged or recurrent sensations. No single duration automatically determines a disorder or prognosis.
Can a blood test or brain scan diagnose DPDR?
No specific laboratory or imaging test confirms DPDR disorder. Clinicians may use tests when symptoms or examination suggest another medical or neurological explanation.
Do online DPDR tests work?
Questionnaires can measure or screen symptoms, but no online score by itself diagnoses the disorder or identifies its cause.
Are grounding techniques a proven cure?
No. Grounding may provide subjective support for some people, but high-quality condition-specific treatment evidence is limited.
Can depersonalization or derealization go away?
Transient experiences often resolve, and improvement is possible with persistent symptoms. Recovery times vary, and individualized assessment is more informative than predictions from symptom descriptions.
When should I seek urgent medical help?
Seek urgent help for episodes accompanied by altered consciousness, seizure-like events, new severe headache, focal weakness, acute confusion, severe intoxication, or immediate safety risks.
Related Articles
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Dissociative disorders. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787.x08_Dissociative_Disorders
Hunter, E. C. M., Baker, D., Phillips, M. L., Sierra, M., & David, A. S. (2005). Cognitive-behaviour therapy for depersonalisation disorder: An open study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(9), 1121–1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.003
Merck Manual Professional Edition. (2026). Depersonalization/derealization disorder. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/psychiatric-disorders/dissociative-disorders/depersonalization-derealization-disorder
Millman, L. S. M., Huang, X., Wainipitapong, S., Medford, N., & Pick, S. (2024). Behavioural, autonomic, and neural responsivity in depersonalisation-derealisation disorder: A systematic review of experimental evidence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 163, 105783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105783
Saini, F., Ponzo, S., Silvestrin, F., Fotopoulou, A., & David, A. S. (2022). Depersonalization disorder as a systematic downregulation of interoceptive signals. Scientific Reports, 12, 22123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22277-y
Sierra, M., & Berrios, G. E. (2000). The Cambridge Depersonalization Scale: A new instrument for the measurement of depersonalization. Psychiatry Research, 93(2), 153–164. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10725532/
Sierra, M., Phillips, M. L., Ivin, G., Krystal, J., & David, A. S. (2003). A placebo-controlled, cross-over trial of lamotrigine in depersonalization disorder. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 17(1), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881103017001712
Simeon, D. (2014). Depersonalization/derealization disorder. In Gabbard's Treatments of Psychiatric Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9781585625048.gg25
Spiegel, D., Loewenstein, R. J., Lewis-Fernández, R., Sar, V., Simeon, D., Vermetten, E., Cardeña, E., Brown, R. J., & Dell, P. F. (2011). Dissociative disorders in DSM-5. Depression and Anxiety, 28(12), E17–E45. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20923
Wang, S., Zheng, S., Zhang, X., Ma, R., Feng, S., Song, M., Zhu, H., & Jia, H. (2024). The treatment of depersonalization-derealization disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 25(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2023.2231920
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077263
Yang, J., Millman, L. S. M., David, A. S., & Hunter, E. C. M. (2023). The prevalence of depersonalization-derealization disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, 24(1), 8–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2022.2079796