Corpus Callosum: Communication Between Brain Hemispheres

4 days ago

17 min read

Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy

What Does the Corpus Callosum Do?

The corpus callosum is the largest commissural white-matter pathway in the human brain. It contains axons that connect extensive parts of the left and right cerebral hemispheres, allowing cortical networks to exchange information and coordinate their activity. This interhemispheric communication contributes to sensory perception, coordinated movement, attention, language-related processing, and complex cognition. The effects vary with the particular cortical systems involved, the task, and developmental history. These functions are supported by anatomical research, electrophysiology, neuroimaging, and evidence from people with callosal lesions or surgical disconnection Goldstein et al., 2023 and Innocenti et al., 2022.

The familiar description of the corpus callosum as a bridge is a starting point, not a mechanism. The pathway contains multiple populations of axons connecting different cortical regions, and their influence depends on the receiving circuits. Interactions may support the transfer of signals, the coordination of responses, or context-dependent inhibition of competing activity. Interhemispheric functional coupling can also arise through other anatomical routes and shared subcortical inputs. The structural pathway and the broader functional relationship between hemispheres must therefore be distinguished Mancuso et al., 2019.

Location, Shape, and Anatomical Organization

The corpus callosum lies deep in the midline of the cerebrum, above the lateral ventricles and underneath the cerebral cortex. In a midsagittal view it appears as a curved band forming an arch between the hemispheres. Its axons fan laterally into the cerebral white matter toward frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital cortices. The cortical neurons that produce many of these axons are located outside the callosum; the callosum mainly houses the pathways extending from them. Its position makes it the principal direct cortical commissure in typical human anatomy Goldstein et al., 2023.

Four major subdivisions are commonly described. The rostrum is the thin lower anterior part. The genu forms the rounded front and contains prominent projections involving anterior and frontal cortical regions. The body, or trunk, forms the long central portion and includes fibers connecting motor, sensory, parietal, and other regions. The splenium is the expanded posterior end with substantial posterior cortical connections, including occipital pathways. The isthmus is sometimes differentiated near the junction of the body and splenium. These labels describe relative anatomy and connectivity tendencies; no part serves as a self-contained center of intelligence, creativity, emotion, or memory Barbaresi et al., 2024.

Callosal axons connect both homotopic sites, which occupy approximately corresponding positions in both hemispheres, and heterotopic sites, which differ in their cortical location. The distribution of fibers overlaps among sectors, and maps vary across individuals and methods. Anterior–posterior topography gives researchers useful probabilistic information, but does not authorize a simplistic statement that one callosal segment alone performs one mental operation. Cortical areas participate in overlapping, dynamic networks, and connections acquire meaning through those networks Innocenti et al., 2022.

What Is the Corpus Callosum Made Of?

The corpus callosum is predominantly white matter and consists of a large number of axons, often described in educational anatomy as approximately 200 million fibers. The figure is an estimate rather than an individual count available from a routine brain scan. Axons vary in diameter, conduction properties, myelination, length, and the cortical regions they connect. Myelin is formed by oligodendrocytes and supports effective electrical conduction. Glial cells, extracellular components, and vasculature are also part of the tract, adding complexity beyond a bundle of passive wires Goldstein et al., 2023 and Barbaresi et al., 2024.

A spike generated by a cortical projection neuron can travel along its callosal axon and influence neurons across the midline through synaptic transmission. Many callosal projection neurons are excitatory pyramidal neurons, yet their inputs may also recruit inhibitory interneurons within the target cortex. Consequently, a net inhibition observed at the circuit level does not mean the axon itself releases an inhibitory neurotransmitter. The result depends on local synaptic architecture, simultaneous inputs, previous learning, and the state of the receiving network Innocenti et al., 2022.

How Does Communication Between Hemispheres Actually Work?

Interhemispheric transfer is produced by electrical signaling along axons and synaptic effects in distributed cortical populations. Signals do not cross as completed thoughts; they represent activity within neurons participating in sensory, motor, associative, and regulatory circuits. A given projection can support transmission of a task-relevant signal, facilitate coordinated bilateral recruitment, or help regulate competing processes. The corpus callosum is also a conduit for interactions whose effects depend on timing and the reciprocal activity of connected networks. Functional research therefore asks which cells, target regions, and tasks are involved, rather than treating the callosum as one undifferentiated communication channel Jabłonka et al., 2025.

Historically, investigators contrasted excitatory integration with interhemispheric inhibition. Reviews find support for several modes of influence and show why their effects can coexist van der Knaap and van der Ham, 2011. An anatomical connection can promote excitation of some cells while recruiting inhibitory networks that shape activity elsewhere. Effective communication also depends on convergence from other sources, changing network states, and behavioral demands. Coherence in an EEG recording or correlation in resting-state fMRI cannot alone distinguish these mechanisms or establish that information moved causally through a particular callosal fiber.

Functions in Sensation, Movement, and Cognition

Vision and sensory integration

The arrangement of visual pathways means that information from the left visual field reaches the right cerebral hemisphere initially and information from the right visual field reaches the left hemisphere initially. Callosal pathways can help integrate representations across those specialized cortical systems, including information near the vertical visual meridian and comparisons involving signals presented to opposite hemifields. Somatosensory and auditory systems also rely on patterns of bilateral and lateralized processing. The contribution of the callosum depends on the modality, stimulus, and behavior tested; the optic chiasm and corpus callosum are anatomically different structures with different roles Gazzaniga, 2000.

The experience of an integrated visual environment depends on multiple visual, attentional, and associative networks. Removing the callosal pathway can reveal specific deficits in comparing information across visual fields, but retained forms of perception and response demonstrate that the effects are selective. Neuroscientists infer callosal functions by identifying the conditions under which performance changes, rather than assuming the structure is responsible for a complete and unified experience of vision.

Bimanual movement and motor coordination

Everyday actions such as buttoning a shirt or manipulating an object with both hands involve bilateral motor cortex, premotor regions, sensory feedback, cerebellar and basal ganglia circuits, and spinal pathways. The corpus callosum can support information exchange and interactions among motor networks, including timing and task-dependent interhemispheric inhibition. A lesion affecting selected connections may lead to difficulties that become especially visible during complex bimanual tasks. Such effects are informative about the disrupted circuit but depend on lesion location and associated neurological injury Innocenti et al., 2022.

The term interhemispheric inhibition is useful in motor research when precisely operationalized; it does not establish that one hemisphere always dominates or suppresses the other. Facilitation, inhibition, competition, and coordination occur within interacting neural networks. The corpus callosum helps regulate selected interactions while numerous other brain and spinal systems contribute to action.

Language, hemispheric specialization, and attention

In most individuals certain language processes exhibit left-hemisphere predominance, while complementary processes and aspects of social communication involve bilateral networks. The right hemisphere contributes to context-sensitive processing, prosody, and other operations depending on the task. Callosal pathways can make information processed predominantly in one hemisphere available to specialized networks in the other. Classical split-brain effects involving verbal reports, visual fields, and hand responses illuminate this organization Gazzaniga, 2000.

Executive functions and sustained attention similarly involve distributed activity. The prefrontal cortex participates in goal maintenance and control, but its contributions depend on communication with other cortical and subcortical systems. The role of cross-hemisphere connectivity is one component of that larger architecture. Read Prefrontal Cortex: Functions in Planning, Control, and Behavior for this network perspective. Distinguishing actual hemispheric specialization from personality claims is developed in Left Brain vs. Right Brain: Hemispheres, Specialization, and Myths.

How Does the Corpus Callosum Develop?

During fetal development, cortical projection neurons extend axons toward the brain’s midline, navigate specialized guidance environments, cross toward the opposite hemisphere, and establish connections with emerging neural networks. Multiple molecular signaling systems help guide these processes. Thereafter, axonal remodeling, myelination, glial maturation, and experience-dependent change continue through postnatal development. Animal research identifies important mechanisms of axon guidance and circuit maturation; comparative timing and functional interpretation in humans require independent evidence Jabłonka et al., 2025.

The structure’s shape, size, and microstructural measurements vary across childhood, adulthood, and later life. These differences are not interchangeable with measures of cognitive talent. Development changes the constraints and opportunities for neural coordination, while behavior results from the whole brain, body, experiences, and environment. Interpreting an unusually small, absent, thick, or thin callosum requires an appropriate medical and neurodevelopmental context instead of a personality inference.

What Did Split-Brain Research Establish?

The history of split-brain science centers on patients whose severe epilepsy led clinicians to sever all or part of the callosal pathway to reduce seizure spread. Roger Sperry, Michael Gazzaniga, and collaborators developed experimental approaches that exposed asymmetries in access to visual, verbal, and manual responses. Under carefully controlled presentation, information entering one visual field might be accessible to one hand but poorly accessible to verbal reporting or the other hand. These findings showed how specialized cortical systems can have limited access to one another after disconnection Gazzaniga, 2000.

Surgical callosotomy provides a rare causal intervention: a major pathway is interrupted, and changes in perception, cognition, and action can be studied. Results must still be interpreted with attention to the patient’s epilepsy, any additional surgery, extent of the section, rehabilitation, and behavioral strategies. Some patients display striking deficits in highly controlled experiments while retaining many abilities in everyday life. Researchers cannot simply generalize from one exceptional surgical case to the functioning of all healthy people de Haan et al., 2020.

Does a Split-Brain Patient Have Two Minds?

Split-brain studies do not settle this question by a single behavioral demonstration. A 2017 study of two patients replicated impaired comparisons across visual half-fields while observing broader responses to stimuli from either visual field than simplified accounts predicted. The authors interpreted the findings as compatible with divided aspects of perception and a more unified agent Pinto et al., 2017. A later critique emphasized that unity of agency and unity of conscious experience involve different questions; task success does not decide the structure of subjective experience Schechter and Bayne, 2021.

A multi-author synthesis describes substantial disintegration in attention and perceptual processing after callosotomy, while noting residual coordination of selected actions de Haan et al., 2020. The empirical observations are more secure than any universal claim that surgery creates exactly two fully independent conscious subjects or necessarily preserves a single completely unified experience. Interpretation remains constrained by small clinical samples, task design, and competing accounts of how noncallosal pathways and behavior might preserve certain forms of integration.

Experimental Evidence for Interhemispheric Transfer

In Poffenberger-type studies, a brief signal is shown in one visual half-field and participants respond as quickly as possible, often with either hand. Some conditions favor processing and response on the same cerebral side, while others place additional demands on cross-hemisphere coordination. A meta-analysis combining individual case data from historical callosotomy investigations estimated longer crossed–uncrossed differences in complete disconnection cases, supporting the sensitivity of the paradigm to interhemispheric processing Westerhausen, 2023.

However, reaction-time differences are influenced by motor preparation, attentional strategy, perception, and the experiment’s assumptions. They cannot be read as a direct stopwatch measurement of a particular axon’s conduction velocity. The same meta-analysis examined bilateral redundant-target paradigms, in which performance is compared when one versus two stimuli are presented. These paradigms produced different patterns, suggesting that they tap different components of hemispheric integration. Their findings have greater value when understood as convergent behavioral evidence rather than interchangeable measurements of one global communication rate.

How Do Scientists Study the Corpus Callosum?

Structural MRI and diffusion MRI

Structural MRI maps brain anatomy and can identify agenesis, malformation, visible lesions, or changes in the size and shape of the corpus callosum. Diffusion MRI estimates aspects of water displacement in tissue. Diffusion tensor imaging and related models use the measurements to infer local white-matter organization; tractography algorithms reconstruct plausible pathways. They are valuable for studying the approximate organization of callosal fibers and for exploring associations across populations Shamir and Assaf, 2025.

A tractography streamline is a model-generated trajectory, not a traced and verified individual axon. Diffusion metrics do not directly count fibers, record spikes, identify the neurotransmitter released at a synapse, or reveal thoughts crossing the brain. Measures are sensitive to fiber orientation, multiple tissue compartments, crossings, scanner acquisition, head motion, and analytic decisions. Even when a group difference is robust, its physiological interpretation and diagnostic value for a single person remain separate questions.

Functional MRI and network connectivity

Functional MRI uses blood-oxygenation-level-dependent signals as an indirect proxy related to neural activity. Researchers analyze temporal correlations between cortical areas to estimate functional connectivity. Such correlations can persist between hemispheres even in some people born without a corpus callosum, illustrating the role of alternate organization or common inputs. A systematic review discusses these observations, variability across studies, and the difficulty of equating synchronized brain signals with direct callosal transmission Mancuso et al., 2019.

Functional correlation alone establishes neither direct anatomical connection nor a causal information-transfer mechanism. Comparing studies of surgical disconnection with congenital agenesis is especially instructive, because a brain developing without the tract may organize differently from a brain that developed it and later lost it. Differences in anatomy, developmental adaptation, pathology, and methodology prevent a simple equivalence between these conditions.

EEG, MEG, stimulation, and lesions

EEG records voltage changes at the scalp, while MEG captures magnetic fields arising from neural currents. Both provide timing information about coordinated neural activity, though interpretation of source location and deep connections has limitations. Evoked potentials and carefully designed transcranial magnetic stimulation can help characterize time-sensitive interactions; they do not, on their own, guarantee identification of one unique anatomical route. Lesion studies and callosotomy demonstrate consequences of disrupted pathways, but accompanying pathology complicates causal attribution. Combining these methods with behavior, structural anatomy, and appropriate controls yields stronger inferences. See Brain Imaging Methods: What MRI, fMRI, PET, and EEG Measure.

Agenesis of the Corpus Callosum: Developmental Absence

Agenesis of the corpus callosum is a congenital difference in which all or part of this structure fails to develop. Complete agenesis, partial agenesis, and other callosal malformations are distinct anatomical descriptions, and an evaluation also considers associated cerebral, systemic, and genetic findings. Some individuals show substantial developmental or neurological difficulties; others function well in many domains. Individual prognosis is heterogeneous and depends on multiple factors, making the imaging label insufficient as a prediction of intelligence or everyday ability Wright and Booth, 2023.

Observed difficulties may involve aspects of motor coordination, processing speed, complex language use, executive functioning, learning, social understanding, or the integration of information. These are possible patterns, not mandatory symptoms. A scoping review of pediatric neuropsychological research identified substantial heterogeneity of study methods and outcomes, together with some recurrent features in subgroups. It is appropriate to assess the person’s actual developmental needs and strengths rather than assign a standardized cognitive profile solely from the anatomy Wright and Booth, 2023.

Research on congenital callosal absence provides important evidence for developmental neuroplasticity. Some people show preserved bilateral functional correlations despite markedly altered structural connections. Alternative commissures, shared subcortical inputs, reorganized cortical pathways, and network-level adaptation are candidate explanations, with their relative importance differing across people and tasks. Compensation can be substantial without being universal or fully understood Mancuso et al., 2019.

Prenatal Diagnosis and Clinical Evaluation

Callosal differences may first be suspected on prenatal ultrasound or identified later through clinical MRI. Further assessment may examine whether the difference is isolated, whether additional brain abnormalities are present, and whether a genetic or other etiology can be established. An international expert consensus recommends structured evaluation and considers when fetal MRI and genetic investigations should be offered; exact decisions require individualized fetal-medicine counseling Corroenne et al., 2025.

Prognostic discussions must take account of the limits of prenatal imaging and differences between isolated and non-isolated findings. Follow-up may include developmental monitoring and targeted services when needed. A routine neuroimaging measurement cannot diagnose autism, ADHD, learning disability, or a particular future behavioral outcome, and the absence of an isolated finding on one scan does not eliminate every clinical uncertainty.

Corpus Callosum Injury and Neurological Disorders

Acquired callosal damage can occur with traumatic brain injury, demyelinating disorders, ischemic or other vascular lesions, inflammatory disease, tumors, and additional conditions. The effects depend on where the lesion occurs and what other brain structures are affected. Selected patients may show disconnection signs or deficits in sensory transfer and motor coordination, while others have different or relatively subtle manifestations. Interpretation is a clinical task requiring history, neurological examination, and appropriate imaging Goldstein et al., 2023.

Changes in callosal size or diffusion metrics have been associated with various neurological and psychiatric conditions in research. Such findings do not make the callosum a single causal explanation for the disorder, and they are not validated universal individual diagnostic biomarkers. Correlation between a group-level imaging measure and behavior cannot by itself determine whether the brain difference caused the symptom, followed from it, reflected other factors, or co-occurred through complex development.

Why Do Surgeons Sometimes Cut the Corpus Callosum?

Corpus callosotomy is an established specialist surgical intervention considered for selected cases of severe drug-resistant epilepsy, particularly when drop attacks or rapid spread of seizures across hemispheres cause serious harm. Sectioning callosal pathways can reduce the ability of seizure activity to generalize between sides. The operation typically aims to reduce specific seizure burdens and injury risk rather than remove every possible seizure origin Cleveland Clinic, Corpus Callosotomy.

Clinical benefits and adverse effects depend on the patient, epilepsy type, operative extent, and other treatment factors. Partial and complete disconnections can differ in consequences for perception, coordination, and language-related tasks. Neurosurgical eligibility and follow-up are determined by epilepsy specialists. Split-brain research grew out of this clinical context; the procedure has no role as a general cognitive or personality enhancement.

Aging, Plasticity, and Claims About Brain Training

Development and aging bring changes in myelination, tissue volume, and diffusion-derived indices of white matter organization. Reviews of age-related callosal changes report regional patterns and associations with aspects of sensorimotor and cognitive performance, while emphasizing the need to distinguish callosal-specific mechanisms from broader age-related brain changes Delvenne and Malloy, 2025. Observational associations do not prove that a particular callosal change caused every observed difference in behavior.

Experience and rehabilitation can affect distributed neural networks. That general principle does not validate commercial promises that an exercise, music program, app, or training technique reliably enlarges the corpus callosum and improves intelligence or mood. Establishing an intervention effect requires appropriate controls, meaningful behavioral outcomes, evidence of durability, and sound interpretation of any imaging change. A diffusion MRI shift by itself does not establish improved health or more efficient neural communication.

What a Corpus Callosum Scan Can—and Cannot—Tell You

Structural MRI can identify important anatomical findings, while diffusion MRI can estimate model-based tissue characteristics and inferred fiber pathways. Functional MRI, EEG, MEG, behavioral tasks, and stimulation each investigate different dimensions of neural organization. No universally validated measurement condenses all interhemispheric function into a single 'communication score,' and a person’s IQ, emotional capacity, political views, or creativity cannot be read from the size of this tract. Interpreting neuroimaging is most reliable when the physical measurement and the proposed psychological inference are kept separate Shamir and Assaf, 2025.

Common Misconceptions

The idea that one hemisphere is logical and the other creative extends a real phenomenon—lateralization of particular functions—into a whole-person myth. People recruit networks on both sides of the brain. The corpus callosum supports some cooperation between specialized networks, but it does not divide people into personality categories. Similarly, a larger callosum does not automatically establish greater intelligence, and greater functional correlation is not necessarily better cognition. A detailed companion discussion appears in Left Brain vs. Right Brain: Hemispheres, Specialization, and Myths.

A second misconception holds that split-brain operations necessarily create two entirely separate persons or personalities. Carefully observed disconnection effects are established, but their implications for conscious unity remain disputed. A third misconception assumes that congenital absence must produce one severe, uniform disability; developmental outcomes in agenesis are variable. A fourth suggests that meditation or a few coordination drills have a proven ability to repair this brain pathway. General training and plasticity evidence does not justify such clinical claims de Haan et al., 2020 and Wright and Booth, 2023.

Where Research Is Heading

Research is mapping projections with increasing anatomical detail, examining state-dependent callosal influences in specific sensory and motor circuits, and comparing adult surgical disconnection with brains that developed without the tract. The 2024 review of intrinsic callosal organization describes regional fiber systems, glia, and possible contributions of local elements within the tract Barbaresi et al., 2024. A 2025 review of molecular and circuit mechanisms highlights multiple layers of regulation and developmental organization Jabłonka et al., 2025.

Advanced diffusion MRI and connectomics offer richer structural estimates, but their reconstructed pathways remain model-dependent. The important questions are mechanistic and testable: which cell populations connect which cortical territories, when do their projections facilitate or suppress activity, and how does the developing brain adapt when customary connections are absent? Progress depends on integrating anatomical, physiological, behavioral, and clinical evidence without turning group-level associations into unsupported personal diagnostics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the corpus callosum in simple terms?

It is a large band of white-matter fibers linking cortical areas in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. It helps those networks exchange signals and coordinate selected aspects of perception, action, and cognition.

What does the corpus callosum connect?

It connects many regions of the left and right cerebral cortex, including frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital territories. The exact pathways depend on the location of the projection neurons and target cells.

Is the corpus callosum white matter or gray matter?

It is predominantly white matter, containing large numbers of axons, many of which are myelinated, together with glial and vascular elements.

Does the corpus callosum control emotions?

It can contribute to interactions between distributed networks involved in emotion, but emotional experience and regulation depend on many cortical, subcortical, bodily, and environmental mechanisms.

Can you live without a corpus callosum?

Yes. Some people are born without the structure and others have undergone surgical sectioning. Outcomes vary with development, other brain conditions, and the functional organization of remaining pathways.

What is agenesis of the corpus callosum?

It means the corpus callosum is absent completely or in part because of a difference in prenatal development. MRI and clinical evaluation help characterize associated findings and guide appropriate follow-up.

Does the corpus callosum make the hemispheres work together?

It is a major route for communication between cortical networks on both sides. Other commissures, subcortical circuits, and coordinated inputs also contribute to bilateral activity.

Is a thin corpus callosum always a disease?

No. The significance of callosal thickness depends on age, anatomy, measurement method, the rest of the imaging examination, symptoms, and medical context.

Does split-brain surgery cause two personalities?

Research demonstrates particular losses of information transfer and integration, but the idea of two complete personalities is not an established general consequence. Questions about conscious unity remain debated.

Can MRI show messages traveling between hemispheres?

No. Structural MRI shows anatomy, diffusion MRI estimates water displacement and inferred fibers, and functional MRI measures blood-oxygenation-associated signals. None directly displays individual thoughts traveling through axons.

Is the corpus callosum connected to the thalamus?

The corpus callosum mainly provides direct cortical interhemispheric fibers, while thalamic nuclei form distinct cortical–subcortical pathways. Both influence large-scale brain organization through different anatomical arrangements. See Thalamus: How Brain Circuits Relay and Regulate Information.

Can brain exercises repair the corpus callosum?

Some forms of learning and rehabilitation can change brain function, but a general exercise prescription that reliably repairs callosal fibers or improves broad mental ability is not established. Interventions for neurological injuries require individualized medical assessment.

Which test best measures corpus callosum function?

There is no universal best test. Structural MRI, diffusion imaging, functional recordings, neuropsychological tasks, and clinical examination provide different types of information. The relevant method depends on the scientific or medical question.

References

Barbaresi, P., et al. (2024). Intrinsic organization of the corpus callosum. Frontiers in Physiology, 15, 1393000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1393000

Cleveland Clinic. (2024). Corpus Callosum: What It Is, Function, Location & Disorders. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/body/corpus-callosum

Cleveland Clinic. Corpus Callosotomy: What It Is, Procedure, Side Effects & Risks. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/treatments/11546-corpus-callosotomy

Corroenne, R., et al. (2025). Prenatal evaluation, diagnosis and management of fetal corpus callosal abnormalities: International Delphi consensus. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 66, 582–588. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.70003

de Haan, E. H. F., et al. (2020). Split-Brain: What We Know Now and Why This Is Important for Understanding Consciousness. Neuropsychology Review, 30, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09439-3

Delvenne, J.-F., & Malloy, E. (2025). Functional implications of age-related atrophy of the corpus callosum. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 169, 105982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105982

Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000). Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: Does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? Brain, 123, 1293–1326. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.7.1293

Goldstein, A., Covington, B. P., Mahabadi, N., & Mesfin, F. B. (2023). Neuroanatomy, Corpus Callosum. StatPearls, NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448209/

Innocenti, G. M., et al. (2022). The functional characterization of callosal connections. Progress in Neurobiology, 208, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102186

Jabłonka, J., Sztencel, A., Rucińska, M., & Kolas, M. (2025). Molecular and circuit mechanisms underlying interhemispheric communication in the mammalian brain. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 85, 196–260. https://doi.org/10.55782/85vnmg24

Mancuso, L., Uddin, L. Q., Nani, A., Costa, T., & Cauda, F. (2019). Brain functional connectivity in individuals with callosotomy and agenesis of the corpus callosum: A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 105, 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.004

Pinto, Y., et al. (2017). Split brain: Divided perception but undivided consciousness. Brain, 140, 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww358

Schechter, E., & Bayne, T. (2021). Consciousness after split-brain surgery: The recent challenge to the classical picture. Neuropsychologia, 160, 107987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107987

Shamir, I., & Assaf, Y. (2025). Tutorial: A guide to diffusion MRI and structural connectomics. Nature Protocols, 20, 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-024-01052-5

van der Knaap, L. J., & van der Ham, I. J. M. (2011). How does the corpus callosum mediate interhemispheric transfer? A review. Behavioural Brain Research, 223, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.018

Westerhausen, R. (2023). Interhemispheric Integration after Callosotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Poffenberger and Redundant-Target Paradigms. Neuropsychology Review, 33, 872–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09569-w

Wright, A., & Booth, R. (2023). Neuropsychological profiles of children with agenesis of the corpus callosum: A scoping review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 65, 1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15532

Psychological Encyclopedia