Continuing Bonds in Grief: Remembering and Connecting With the Deceased
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Grief, Loss & Bereavement · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Continuing bonds in grief are the ways people maintain an ongoing psychological, emotional, symbolic, or spiritual relationship with someone who has died. The relationship changes after death, yet memories, values, stories, rituals, places, possessions, and imagined conversations may remain important parts of a person's life. A continuing bond can bring warmth and orientation, trigger painful longing, or do both at different moments.
The concept helps answer a question many bereaved people ask: Is it normal to keep talking to someone who died, preserve their belongings, celebrate their birthday, or feel guided by what they would have said? These experiences can belong to ordinary grief. Research does not support a universal instruction either to maintain the bond or to let it go. The more useful questions concern its meaning, flexibility, emotional effects, and relationship to everyday functioning. A 2024 systematic review of 79 studies found themes of comfort and distress, relational identity, and spirituality and uncertainty.
What Are Continuing Bonds in Grief?
Continuing bonds describe an ongoing inner or socially expressed relationship with a deceased person. Someone may preserve a sense of closeness through memories, draw on the deceased person's advice, tell family stories, cook a familiar meal, wear a keepsake, visit a meaningful location, or participate in religious commemorations. The bond may be quiet and private or openly shared. Sometimes it is chosen; sometimes a sound, dream, scent, photograph, or familiar phrase brings it into awareness unexpectedly.
In bereavement research, the concept describes a family of experiences rather than a single technique, symptom, or clinical diagnosis. It does not imply that the deceased is physically alive or that every bereaved person believes communication after death is possible. Scholars distinguish the person's experience and interpretation from any claim about an external supernatural event. Stroebe, Schut, and Boerner's theoretical review locates continuing bonds within attachment and bereavement adaptation, while the Hewson and colleagues systematic review shows their diversity.
The expression covers several related experiences: remembering someone, preserving a sense of relationship, maintaining a legacy, experiencing spontaneous reminders, and at times sensing the person's presence. A person can have some of these experiences without the others. Continuing bonds also evolve over months and years; a powerful attachment in early bereavement may become a quieter source of identity and connection, or it may fluctuate with anniversaries and life transitions.
Where the Continuing Bonds Approach Came From
Earlier Western grief writing often emphasized detaching emotional energy from the deceased as part of recovery. Research and clinical observation increasingly documented that bereaved people frequently carry relationships forward by remembering, identifying with, speaking about, and honoring those who died. The continuing bonds perspective helped researchers consider these experiences in their own right.
This historical shift is sometimes simplified into a rule that preserving a bond is always healthy. The evidence supports a more nuanced conclusion. Stroebe and Schut's review of the continuing-versus-relinquishing debate found insufficient basis for declaring either pattern universally beneficial. Their later theoretical integration proposed that the type of bond, underlying processes, attachment history, and coping context matter.
Continuing bonds also differ from the popular five stages of grief. They describe how a relationship may be carried forward, while stage models attempt to characterize grief reactions over time. There is no requirement to complete a sequence of emotions before a bond can change. Readers exploring that separate question can consult Stages of Grief: What Research Supports.
What Continuing Bonds Can Look Like in Everyday Life
Memories, photographs, objects, and familiar places
A bereaved person may keep a coat, handwritten note, recipe book, photograph, voice recording, or personal object because it evokes a valued relationship. They may revisit a family home, a place where they walked together, or a favorite song. These objects and settings may support memory and identity, although their meaning can change: a photograph that brings comfort one day can hurt deeply on another.
Keeping possessions and later giving some away are both compatible with an evolving bond. Neither choice, taken alone, indicates how well someone is adjusting. A person may gradually choose which belongings remain personally meaningful, store others privately, or invite relatives to share them.
Stories, inherited values, and an inner sense of guidance
Some bonds are expressed less through objects than through a person's influence. A son might ask how his late father would have approached a hard decision. A surviving partner might continue a shared commitment to hospitality. A friend might repeat a joke or tell stories that keep a person's distinctive character present in a social group.
Researchers sometimes describe this as an internalized bond: the deceased person's place in memory, identity, values, or a sense of secure connection. Studies suggest that internalized forms can be associated with adaptive outcomes, but the findings are correlational and vary across samples. Black and colleagues' four-study investigation examined internalized and externalized expressions, while Field and Filanosky's study explored related risk factors and adjustment.
Talking to someone who died or writing a letter
Some people speak aloud while driving, at a grave, or in a quiet room, or write letters that will never be sent. They may describe news, express gratitude, share anger, or say something unfinished. These practices can provide structure for feelings or help someone clarify their thoughts. Other people experience them as uncomfortable and choose different forms of remembrance.
An imagined conversation can be understood as a way of engaging memories and internal representations. Its usefulness is personal and context dependent. If it increases distress or makes daily life increasingly difficult, a counselor can help explore what happens before, during, and after the practice.
Rituals, anniversaries, and shared remembrance
Continuing bonds may be enacted through memorial services, prayers, candles, donations, storytelling, visits to burial places, food traditions, cultural festivals, or annual gatherings. Such practices connect private memory with the social world. Some families prefer predictable rituals; others remember spontaneously and avoid fixed dates.
Anniversaries can intensify grief because they concentrate memories and expectations. People may plan a modest remembrance, ask others for company, or intentionally leave room for a change of mind. A ritual should remain responsive to the needs of the bereaved rather than become a test of love or loyalty.
Dreams and unexpected sensory reminders
Dreams involving the deceased, an impression of hearing a familiar voice, a fleeting sense that they are nearby, or the vivid recognition of a familiar scent may occur in bereavement. These experiences differ in clarity, duration, personal meaning, and degree of voluntary control.
An interdisciplinary review in Schizophrenia Bulletin found that sensory and quasi-sensory experiences of the deceased are often benign and must be considered in relational and cultural context. A separate 2026 qualitative systematic review described both comforting and distressing interpretations of perceived after-death communications. Neither review establishes that a supernatural communication occurred; each examines reported human experiences.
Internalized and Externalized Continuing Bonds
Researchers sometimes distinguish internalized from externalized forms. Internalized bonds involve an enduring representation of the deceased: memories, lessons, identity, and the capacity to imagine their support. Externalized bonds include some experiences in which the deceased is perceived as present outside the self, such as a voice, vision, or vivid sign. The boundary is a research distinction, not a diagnostic test.
Some observational studies associate internalized bonds with more positive adaptation and externalized bonds with higher distress or trauma symptoms. These patterns cannot determine whether a particular experience is helpful, harmful, or clinically significant. Black and colleagues found different associations across four online samples; Field and Filanosky reported patterns shaped partly by violent loss, perceived responsibility, and attachment.
The categories also overlap. A person might consciously remember a parent's advice, dream about the parent, and sometimes sense their presence. Research instruments and cultural assumptions influence which experiences get assigned to which category. Their emotional meaning, frequency, perceived reality, safety, and impact on functioning are more clinically informative than the category name alone. A 2026 study comparing bereaved people with and without prolonged grief disorder underscores the importance of how the bond is experienced, not merely whether it exists.
Do Continuing Bonds Help People Cope With Grief?
The strongest evidence supports variability. Continuing bonds can be sources of affection, reassurance, identity continuity, meaning, and belonging. They can also be linked to yearning, guilt, conflict, intrusive reminders, or distress. The same person may experience several of these responses, even during one day.
The 2024 systematic review synthesized 79 eligible studies, including quantitative and qualitative research. It identified comfort and distress; ongoing bonds and relational identity; and uncertainty, concepts, and spirituality. The review documents adaptive possibilities without demonstrating that encouraging continuing bonds as an intervention causes better outcomes. Differences in definitions, measures, populations, and study designs limit causal conclusions.
An earlier review by Root and Exline recommended attending to whether a bond feels positive or negative, what the relationship had been like before the death, and afterlife beliefs. These details are often more useful than counting memorial activities or measuring the intensity of closeness by itself.
When bonds feel supportive
A bond may help when remembrance offers a stable sense of connection while the person also has opportunities for present-day relationships, activities, and choices. Examples include recalling the deceased as a source of encouragement, integrating their values into new roles, remembering warmly with other people, or choosing a commemoration without feeling compelled to repeat it.
Such effects are plausible and frequently reported, but evidence does not justify prescribing the same remembrance activity for everyone. A person who finds peace in memories and a person who prefers occasional private recognition may both be adapting well.
When bonds feel painful or conflicted
A continuing bond can also evoke unfinished conversations, anger, guilt, traumatic images, perceived obligations, or uncertainty about the relationship. For someone whose relationship was abusive, estranged, or ambivalent, a simple celebration of the person's legacy may feel inaccurate or unsafe. Mourning may involve acknowledging love, injury, relief, resentment, and responsibility in complex combinations.
If the deceased was associated with coercion or violence, maintaining boundaries after death can be psychologically meaningful. The bereaved person may decide which memories to engage, whether any ritual is appropriate, and whether they want help exploring conflicting feelings. It is possible to honor one's own experience without idealizing the relationship.
When a bond becomes restrictive
It may be useful to seek additional support when remembrance repeatedly overwhelms the person, dominates waking life, prevents essential tasks, intensifies traumatic memories, or is experienced as an unchosen obligation. Clinicians should consider the whole picture, including grief intensity, culture, sleep, mood, trauma symptoms, supports, and ability to function.
The presence of a bond does not by itself establish a disorder. Conversely, a treasured bond does not rule out depression, prolonged grief disorder, or another condition that merits assessment. Evidence addresses patterns and associations; evaluation addresses the needs and functioning of an individual.
Attachment, Memory, Identity, and Meaning
People maintain inner representations of important relationships throughout life. After a death, memories and expectations linked to that relationship may persist even as practical circumstances change. Attachment perspectives investigate how that inner representation can provide security, prompt proximity-seeking, or interact with fears of separation. The theoretical integration by Stroebe, Schut, and Boerner proposes that attachment-related processes help explain varied outcomes.
Meaning reconstruction describes efforts to understand what happened, what the relationship meant, and how life and identity are reorganized after loss. In a study of 506 bereaved young adults, Neimeyer and colleagues found that the association between stronger ongoing bonds and distress depended partly on difficulty making sense of the loss. It was an observational study, so it cannot establish that a particular remembrance practice causes recovery or impairment.
Identity may be shaped by a deceased person's teachings, shared experiences, and the roles once held in the relationship. A surviving spouse can remain a spouse in memory while discovering changing responsibilities; a bereaved adult child may carry family traditions into a new generation. Connection can coexist with profound change. It need not involve re-creating the relationship exactly as it was.
Cultural and spiritual contexts also shape meaning. Some communities emphasize ancestor remembrance, collective ritual, prayers, shared graveside visits, or continuing obligations to the dead; others emphasize personal reflection or secular storytelling. An analysis of continuing bonds in cultural and existential research treats bonds within these larger social settings. No single cultural model should be used to judge every bereaved person's experience.
Continuing Bonds and the Dual Process Model of Grief
The dual process model describes oscillation between loss-oriented coping, such as longing and remembering, and restoration-oriented coping, such as attending to changed roles, practical responsibilities, and new routines. Continuing bonds can appear on either side: a memory may evoke sadness, and an inherited value may guide a new undertaking.
Movement between grief-related attention and other parts of life can be healthy and practical. Someone may spend time looking through photographs and later focus on work, friendships, or rest. Rest from grief does not cancel the relationship. Visit The Dual Process Model of Grief: Coping With Loss and Restoration for a fuller explanation of that model.
These are complementary theoretical lenses, rather than required steps of grief or universal rules for emotional behavior. Their value lies in helping people and clinicians ask how remembrance interacts with day-to-day adaptation.
Continuing Bonds, Prolonged Grief Disorder, and Other Clinical Concerns
Normal grief can involve strong longing, memories, crying, waves of pain, dreams, and continuing bonds. Prolonged grief disorder (PGD) describes a specific pattern of persistent, intense grief with clinically significant distress or impairment that exceeds expected cultural and contextual norms. The existence of a continuing bond is not a PGD symptom on its own and is not evidence that someone has failed to accept a death.
Under DSM-5-TR, the death must have occurred at least 12 months earlier for adults or at least 6 months earlier for children and adolescents, alongside the required symptom pattern and impairment. ICD-11 uses a minimum period of at least 6 months and a differently structured, culturally contextualized clinical formulation. Time since death is only one component in either system. The American Psychiatric Association's PGD guidance and a comparison of DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 criteria describe these distinctions.
Depression can involve persistent low mood, loss of pleasure, hopelessness, and other symptoms that extend beyond reminders of the deceased. Posttraumatic stress disorder may be prominent after frightening or violent circumstances of death, especially when intrusive trauma memories, avoidance, and threat responses persist. Adjustment disorder and other conditions require separate clinical consideration. Symptoms often overlap, and one checklist cannot reliably distinguish diagnoses for an individual.
A clinician may ask what the bond feels like, whether longing interrupts most activities, what the person believes about the death, and how sleep, relationships, concentration, appetite, safety, and daily tasks have changed. For the full diagnostic intent, see Prolonged Grief Disorder: Symptoms and Diagnosis.
Does feeling the deceased's presence mean psychosis?
A fleeting sense of presence, a grief-related dream, or a perception-like experience can occur without a psychotic disorder. The interdisciplinary review by Kamp and colleagues concludes that most reported sensory and quasi-sensory experiences of the deceased are benign and should be understood within personal and cultural context.
Assessment becomes important when experiences are frightening, persistently disruptive, accompanied by severe confusion or loss of reality testing, command voices, major sleep disturbance, or other concerning changes. A clinician should evaluate possible medical, neurological, substance-related, trauma-related, mood-related, and psychiatric explanations. Respect for personal beliefs is compatible with careful clinical assessment.
What if remembrance brings thoughts of suicide?
After a death, some people describe wishing to be reunited with the person or feeling that life has lost meaning. These experiences deserve compassionate, direct attention. A passive wish to die, active suicidal thoughts, a plan, and immediate intent are different levels of concern; none should be inferred merely because a person maintains a bond.
If someone has thoughts of harming themselves, they should tell a trusted person and seek prompt professional support. If there is immediate danger or a plan they may act on, contact local emergency services or go to an emergency department. Asking directly about safety and helping the person connect with immediate human support is more useful than interpreting the experience as a normal stage of grief.
Continuing Bonds After Different Kinds of Death
Sudden, violent, traumatic, or suicide-related deaths
Circumstances of death can shape the kind of bond people experience. A sudden death may leave questions, disbelief, or intrusive images, while suicide or violence may be accompanied by guilt, blame, stigma, and uncertainty. Memories can be both precious and difficult to approach.
People may need support for trauma symptoms or safety concerns alongside grief support. Therapeutic work can attend to memories of the person beyond the death itself without forcing positive reinterpretation or discouraging all reminders. Research linking types of bonds with violent loss is observational and does not identify a single correct ritual or therapeutic technique. Field and Filanosky examined such associations.
Death of a parent, partner, sibling, child, or friend
The place of the deceased in everyday life changes the practical meaning of a continuing bond. After the death of a partner, rituals may involve a shared home, decisions once made together, and an altered sense of future. After parental death, remembered advice and family stories can become increasingly important at milestones. Parents who lose a child may preserve daily rituals, names, photographs, and a child's place in family narratives for many years.
For friendships and relationships that other people did not recognize, remembrance may be largely private. The central question remains whether the practices are meaningful and workable for the person, not whether outsiders consider the relationship sufficiently close. Disenfranchised Grief: Meaning and Evidence examines unrecognized losses.
When the relationship was complicated
The death of an estranged parent or former partner can bring sadness, anger, uncertainty, or relief. A continuing bond might involve revisiting memories, deciding to break inherited patterns, or acknowledging the relationship's impact without celebrating the deceased. The emotional meaning of a bond is closely linked to the predeath relationship, as discussed in the review by Root and Exline.
Continuing Bonds in Children and Adolescents
Children and teens may maintain bonds through stories, photographs, drawing, play, objects, dreams, digital messages, and family traditions. Their questions and preferences change with development. Younger children may understand death and its permanence differently from adolescents, and the significance of an old memory can change as they grow.
A narrative review of 20 studies identified unintended, intended, and internalized connections in bereaved young people. Some reminders happen spontaneously; other forms of remembrance are deliberately sought. The evidence describes diverse experiences, rather than a standard exercise all children should perform.
Adults can offer age-appropriate choices: look at a photograph together, tell a story, keep a memory box, cook a favorite meal, or opt out. Accurate explanations about death and permission to ask questions help avoid confusion. A child should not be required to attend ceremonies, look at distressing images, or serve as the emotional caretaker of an adult. Children's participation should fit their readiness, family practices, and wishes.
Important transitions—school changes, birthdays, graduation, new relationships—may bring new questions about the deceased. Families can revisit memories as the young person's understanding develops. The goal is responsive support, not a permanently fixed narrative of what the child must feel.
Cultural, Religious, and Spiritual Differences
Continuing bonds can be expressed through remembrance of ancestors, prayer, commemorative meals, cemetery visits, dreams, private gratitude, and collective ceremonies. Faith traditions differ in what communication with the dead means; secular families may understand similar experiences through memory, imagination, and identity.
These frameworks influence whether a person considers an experience comforting, ordinary, sacred, confusing, or taboo. Researchers caution against applying one culture's expectations to another. The 2024 evidence synthesis explicitly identifies spirituality and culture as important contexts that need further investigation, while a 2026 qualitative study of bereaved Costa Rican men illustrates how local meanings can shape reported experience.
Respectful support asks what the experience means to the bereaved individual and whether the practice is welcome. Families can have different beliefs or preferences without any member being obliged to adopt another person's interpretation.
Digital Memories, Social Media, and Continuing Bonds
Photographs, text threads, voice recordings, online memorial pages, archived profiles, and shared digital albums can preserve important parts of a relationship. A bereaved person may reread messages, watch a recording, or participate in a community remembrance. Platforms can also surface automatic anniversary notices or algorithmic reminders at difficult times.
A 2025 qualitative meta-synthesis of seven studies identified practices involving public grief, collective memory, and digitally preserved relationships. A 2026 interview study of 24 bereaved participants describes both the value of digital traces and the emotional consequences of unsolicited algorithmic reminders. These exploratory findings explain reported experiences rather than proving improved health outcomes.
Practical considerations include account access, consent from other family members, privacy of messages, data preservation, platform settings, and whether automatic reminders can be muted. Some people prefer an archive they control rather than repeated notifications. Others value shared commemorations. The right arrangement may change over time.
Interactive digital replicas and AI griefbots introduce separate issues of consent, accuracy, simulation, expectations, privacy, and evidence. Research on ordinary keepsakes or archived messages cannot establish the effectiveness or safety of an interactive simulation of the deceased. Detailed analysis of those technologies belongs to their separate EN-06 digital-bereavement articles once published.
Practical Ways to Remember Someone Who Died
There is no prescribed program for maintaining a bond. The following are options for personal reflection, and each can be adapted, paused, or declined.
Tell a specific story
Recall a moment that captures something distinctive about the person: an ordinary kindness, disagreement, recurring joke, or shared habit. Stories allow a relationship to be represented with nuance. When sharing with others, ask whether they are comfortable hearing or contributing memories.
Make room for meaningful objects
Choose an object, photograph, piece of music, or written message that feels significant. Decide when and where to engage with it. Some people prefer a visible memorial; others keep a private box or digital folder. Changing or reducing the collection later does not measure the depth of love.
Carry forward a value or practice
A person's influence can appear in something you do: generosity, curiosity, cooking, care for a garden, a phrase of advice, or a commitment to another person. The practice belongs to your present life and can evolve as your circumstances change.
Write an unsent letter or personal reflection
A letter can include appreciation, grief, anger, unfinished questions, or recent news. It can be kept, destroyed, revised, or discussed with a trusted person. Writing can clarify experience for some people and intensify distress for others; respond to its actual effects.
Create a flexible anniversary ritual
A birthday, death anniversary, holiday, or family occasion might involve a meal, music, a quiet walk, charity, or meeting with relatives. Leave room for days when participation is difficult. Family members may prefer different forms of recognition.
Choose when to connect and when to rest
Some days invite remembrance; others require attention to work, relationships, recreation, and bodily needs. Deliberate periods of rest from grief are compatible with affection and loyalty. The dual process model provides a useful account of alternating attention.
If a memory practice consistently increases panic, dissociation, shame, sleep disturbance, or suicidal thoughts, stop or adapt it and seek appropriate professional assessment. Coping strategies should serve the person, not become obligations performed despite escalating harm.
How to Support Someone Who Maintains a Bond
A useful first question is, "Would you like to tell me about them?" The bereaved person can then decide how much to share. Listening to a story, remembering the person's name, acknowledging an anniversary, or respecting a cherished object can convey recognition without imposing a view of grief.
Avoid insisting that someone move on by discarding all reminders. Also avoid insisting that they must keep photographs, visit a grave, or feel spiritual closeness. A supporter can ask whether a particular memory feels comforting, painful, or mixed, and whether practical help would be welcome.
When a person reports a dream or sense of presence, listen to their account and its emotional impact. Support does not require affirming a supernatural explanation or disputing the person's cultural worldview. If the experience is distressing, dangerous, or seriously disruptive, encourage compassionate clinical evaluation.
For broader practical strategies, How to Cope With Grief: Evidence-Based Support covers everyday adjustment and social support.
Continuing Bonds in Grief Counseling and Therapy
Grief counseling can create a setting in which someone explores memories, relationship meanings, unfinished conversations, family expectations, and future roles. Depending on the person's wishes, clinicians may use narrative work, memory-focused conversations, written reflection, ritual exploration, or other practices to understand the bond. These techniques are best framed as possible clinical tools, not standardized cures.
The literature on continuing bonds is dominated by observational, qualitative, and conceptual studies. The presence of beneficial personal experiences is not sufficient evidence that a particular bond-strengthening exercise is an effective treatment for major depression, PTSD, or prolonged grief disorder. The Hewson systematic review identifies variation and research gaps rather than a universally effective therapeutic prescription.
For clinically significant prolonged grief, assessment and appropriately selected evidence-based specialist treatment may be necessary. Treatment is determined by symptoms, impairment, preferences, safety, and professional evaluation. It can help someone engage with the reality of the death, revisit distressing material where clinically appropriate, and participate more fully in present life while retaining meaningful memories. Grief Counseling: What It Is and When It Helps addresses the separate support-service intent.
A counselor should be attentive to the person's cultural practice and predeath relationship. Encouraging idealization, compulsory forgiveness, or universal closure can misrepresent painful relationships. Progress is better evaluated through individualized goals and functioning than through whether someone continues to talk about the deceased.
What Research Can and Cannot Establish
Research consistently documents that many bereaved people experience ongoing psychological connections and that these experiences take varied forms. Multiple reviews describe their roles in memory, relationship identity, meaning, spiritual life, comfort, and distress. The most informative synthesis for this question is the 79-study systematic review.
Less certain is whether deliberate maintenance or relinquishment of a bond changes long-term outcomes. Many studies rely on self-report, retrospective accounts, small or selected samples, cross-sectional correlations, culturally limited measures, or inconsistent definitions. A finding that distressed people report stronger externalized bonds does not establish whether the bond generated the distress, distress intensified the experience, or both were shaped by other factors.
Recent studies add detail but require proportionate interpretation. Research comparing internal and external bonds in people with different grief profiles, exploring digital reminders, or documenting small cultural samples helps generate and refine questions. It does not justify treating all forms of continuing bonds as either beneficial interventions or pathological warning signs. The 2026 Keser and colleagues paper and 2026 Malik qualitative study are relevant examples.
Better evidence will require longitudinal and intervention research, precise measurement of bond quality and flexibility, meaningful functional outcomes, and broader cultural representation. The practical conclusion is to consider individual meaning and well-being rather than prescribe a single relationship to memories.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is it normal to talk to someone who has died?
Many bereaved people speak aloud, write letters, or conduct imagined conversations with someone who died. These experiences can be forms of continuing bonds. What matters is the person's interpretation, distress, level of control, and functioning. If experiences become frightening, confusing, or seriously disruptive, a professional assessment can help.
Does keeping photographs or belongings mean I am stuck in grief?
Keeping belongings is not, on its own, an indicator of complicated or prolonged grief. It may preserve memory, identity, affection, or ritual. Its significance depends on the broader experience of grief, daily functioning, and whether the person can make choices about remembrance.
Can a continuing bond help after many years?
A bond can persist or change across the life course. Stories, traditions, identity, and inherited values may remain meaningful many years after death. Research describes this possibility but cannot predict whether particular practices will help any given individual.
Do I have to keep a bond to recover?
No. Continuing bonds describe possible experiences, not an obligation or evidence-based treatment requirement. Someone may remember privately, choose few rituals, or gradually prefer less contact with reminders. The research does not establish one universally optimal approach.
What if a continuing bond makes me feel worse?
Painful bonds deserve attention. Consider whether the distress arises from yearning, conflict, traumatic reminders, guilt, family pressure, or other circumstances. You can alter or pause practices and speak with a trusted person or clinician. Persistent impairment, major mood or trauma symptoms, and safety concerns warrant assessment.
Is dreaming of or sensing a deceased person a sign of mental illness?
Bereavement-related dreams and senses of presence can occur without mental illness. Their meaning depends on context. Seek assessment when experiences are persistently distressing, accompanied by impaired reality testing or confusion, or disrupt daily functioning. Kamp and colleagues' interdisciplinary review discusses the evidence.
What is the difference between continuing bonds and denial of death?
A continuing bond may coexist with understanding that the person has died. For example, someone can acknowledge the finality of death while preserving a memory or honoring a value. Difficulty accepting a death is assessed in context, particularly when associated with persistent severe distress and impairment; the mere presence of remembrance is insufficient to infer denial.
Can children maintain continuing bonds?
Yes. Children and adolescents may keep memories through drawings, stories, objects, play, or family activities. Adults can give choices and developmentally appropriate explanations. A review of 20 studies documents intended, unintended, and internalized connections.
Are social media memorials a form of continuing bonds?
They can be. Archived messages, shared photographs, memorial profiles, and online communities may support remembrance, while automatic reminders and privacy concerns may complicate the experience. The emerging evidence includes a 2025 qualitative synthesis.
Does continuing bonds theory replace the stages of grief?
The approaches address different questions. Continuing bonds explores how a relationship remains psychologically meaningful after death. Stage language concerns patterns of grief reactions, and there is no universal required sequence of stages. See Stages of Grief: What Research Supports.
Related Articles
AI Griefbots: Memory, Consent, and Emotional Risks — research, consent, privacy, and emotional risks in AI simulations of deceased people.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Prolonged grief disorder: Symptoms and diagnosis. Official clinical overview.
Black, J., Belicki, K., Emberley-Ralph, J., & McCann, A. (2022). Internalized versus externalized continuing bonds: Relations to grief, trauma, attachment, openness to experience, and posttraumatic growth. Death Studies, 46(2), 399–414. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1737274.
Clabburn, O., Knighting, K., Jack, B. A., & O'Brien, M. R. (2021). Continuing bonds with children and bereaved young people: A narrative review. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 83(3), 371–389. DOI: 10.1177/0030222819853195.
Field, N. P., & Filanosky, C. (2010). Continuing bonds, risk factors for complicated grief, and adjustment to bereavement. Death Studies. DOI: 10.1080/07481180903372269.
Hewson, H., Galbraith, N., Jones, C., & Heath, G. (2024). The impact of continuing bonds following bereavement: A systematic review. Death Studies, 48(10), 1001–1014. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2223593.
Kamp, K. S., Steffen, E. M., Alderson-Day, B., et al. (2020). Sensory and quasi-sensory experiences of the deceased in bereavement: An interdisciplinary and integrative review. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 46(6), 1367–1381. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa113.
Keser, E., Karaçalık, İ. B., Öztaylan, B. N., Tiryaki-Güven, S., & Türkistan, B. (2026). Perceptions of internal and external continuing bonds in bereaved individuals with and without prolonged grief disorder. Death Studies, 50(5), 706–714. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2025.2454486.
Malik, S. (2026). Digitally mediated continuing bonds: Social media, grief, and relational continuity after death. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying. DOI: 10.1177/00302228261479913.
Martínez-Esquivel, D., & García-Hernández, A. M. (2026). "I know she's there": Meanings of continuing bonds for bereaved Costa Rican men: A qualitative study. Death Studies, 50(7), 1033–1044. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2025.2454504.
Neimeyer, R. A., Baldwin, S. A., & Gillies, J. (2006). Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning: Mitigating complications in bereavement. Death Studies, 30(8), 715–738. DOI: 10.1080/07481180600848322.
Root, B. L., & Exline, J. J. (2014). The role of continuing bonds in coping with grief: Overview and future directions. Death Studies, 38(1–5), 1–8. DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2012.712608.
Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (2005). To continue or relinquish bonds: A review of consequences for the bereaved. Death Studies, 29(6), 477–494. DOI: 10.1080/07481180590962659.
Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Boerner, K. (2010). Continuing bonds in adaptation to bereavement: Toward theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 259–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.007.
Treml, J., Linde, K., Brähler, E., & Kersting, A. (2024). Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR: Differences in prevalence and diagnostic criteria. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 15, 1266132. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1266132.