Cognitive Symptoms of Anxiety: Worry, Threat Monitoring, Doubt, and Concentration
Updated: Oct 8
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 30, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Cognitive symptoms of anxiety are changes in attention, prediction, interpretation, decision-making, and thought that can occur when the mind is anticipating danger or trying to prevent an unwanted outcome. Common experiences include persistent worry, attention repeatedly pulled toward possible threats, negative interpretations of ambiguity, repeated doubt, indecision, and difficulty concentrating. The World Health Organization lists trouble concentrating or making decisions among possible symptoms of anxiety disorders, while the American Psychiatric Association also describes persistent worry and difficulty concentrating as common anxiety symptoms.
These experiences can be uncomfortable and impairing, but none of them by itself establishes an anxiety disorder. Anxiety is also a normal human response to uncertainty and possible threat. Diagnosis depends on the pattern of symptoms, their duration, their intensity, the situations in which they occur, associated avoidance or physical symptoms, and whether they cause clinically significant distress or functional impairment.
This distinction matters because “cognitive symptoms of anxiety” is a symptom-level concept, not a diagnosis. DSM-5-TR and the ICD-11 Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Requirements organize specific disorders with their own diagnostic requirements. Generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, specific phobia, separation anxiety disorder, and selective mutism therefore remain separate clinical territories even though some cognitive processes overlap.
What Counts as a Cognitive Symptom of Anxiety?
A cognitive symptom is an experience involving thought, attention, interpretation, memory, judgment, or decision-making. In anxiety, the most recognizable cognitive experiences involve anticipated threat: the mind asks what could go wrong, scans for evidence that something is wrong, interprets uncertainty conservatively, and has difficulty returning attention to a neutral task.
Three levels should be kept separate. A symptom is something a person experiences, such as difficulty concentrating. A cognitive mechanism is a research construct that may help explain anxiety, such as threat-related attentional bias or negative interpretation bias. A diagnosis is a defined clinical syndrome that requires a particular configuration of symptoms and impairment. Research on a mechanism can illuminate anxiety without making that mechanism a diagnostic criterion.
This is why terms such as hypervigilance, catastrophizing, intolerance of uncertainty, attentional bias, and cognitive distortion should not be treated as interchangeable diagnoses. They describe different phenomena and have different levels of evidence across different anxiety presentations.
Worry and Anticipatory Thinking
Worry is one of the clearest cognitive expressions of anxiety. It usually takes the form of repetitive, future-oriented thinking about possible negative outcomes: “What if I fail?” “What if something happens to my family?” “What if I cannot cope?” Worry becomes especially important in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), where excessive anxiety and worry across multiple areas of life are central. The National Institute of Mental Health notes that GAD involves excessive worry that is difficult to control and may be accompanied by difficulty concentrating.
Clinical worry is more than simply having many thoughts. A major review by Newman and colleagues describes worry as a central process in GAD and examines how worry can maintain sustained negative emotion. Contemporary research also emphasizes uncertainty. A 2026 preregistered meta-analysis by Akbari and colleagues synthesized 138 independent samples and found robust associations among intolerance of uncertainty, worry, and anxiety, with the strongest links for GAD and non-specific anxiety.
That evidence does not mean intolerance of uncertainty is unique to anxiety disorders. The same 2026 analysis found meaningful associations across several diagnostic domains. Worry and uncertainty therefore function best as transdiagnostic psychological processes whose clinical meaning depends on context rather than as a shortcut to diagnosis.
Normal worry vs anxiety-related worry
Normal worry is often proportionate to a real problem, shifts when circumstances change, and can support planning. Anxiety-related worry may become more persistent, difficult to disengage from, repetitive rather than problem-solving, or disproportionate to the immediate evidence. The dividing line is not the mere presence of “what if” thoughts. Frequency, controllability, distress, impairment, and the broader syndrome matter.
A person can also have substantial worry without having GAD. Social anxiety may center worry on scrutiny or rejection. Panic disorder may involve worry about another panic attack or its consequences. Separation anxiety may involve feared harm or loss involving an attachment figure. These are clinically different patterns despite sharing future-oriented threat prediction.
Threat Monitoring and the Feeling That Attention Is Always on Alert
Anxiety can change what captures attention. Someone may notice a facial expression that looks disapproving, a bodily sensation that could signal danger, a sound that might indicate a problem, or a small sign of uncertainty while ignoring neutral information. In daily life this can feel like constantly checking the environment or being unable to stop noticing possible threats.
The research concept most closely related to this experience is threat-related attentional bias. A landmark meta-analysis by Bar-Haim and colleagues found a moderate average association between anxiety and preferential attention to threat across many experimental paradigms. A later eye-tracking meta-analysis by Clauss, Gorday, and Bardeen found smaller but significant associations with both initial orienting toward threat and continued attention to threat.
Threat monitoring is therefore an established research phenomenon at the group level, but it should not be imagined as a fixed “anxiety radar” that works identically in every person or every moment. Shechner and Bar-Haim emphasize flexibility and context: adaptive attention should change with the actual level of danger. Problems may arise when attention becomes insufficiently flexible, remains captured by threat after the situation changes, or repeatedly treats ambiguous information as requiring surveillance.
This also explains why concentration can feel difficult even when a person is trying hard to focus. If part of attention is repeatedly allocated to monitoring possible danger, fewer resources remain available for reading, conversation, planning, learning, or other task-relevant information.
Negative Interpretation of Ambiguous Situations
Anxiety does not only influence where attention goes. It can also influence what uncertain information is taken to mean. A delayed message can be interpreted as rejection, an ordinary bodily sensation as evidence of catastrophe, or a neutral facial expression as criticism. The key feature is ambiguity: the evidence permits more than one explanation, yet the threatening explanation becomes especially available or convincing.
A large three-level meta-analysis published in 2026 by Würtz and colleagues examined 295 samples and 1,450 contrasts and found a medium overall association between anxiety and negative interpretation bias. The association appeared across age groups and anxiety categories, while effect size varied with the way interpretation bias was measured and whether the material matched the person’s anxiety concerns.
Cognitive biases also interact, but the interactions are not simple or deterministic. A systematic review and meta-analysis by Leung and colleagues found small pooled associations among attention, interpretation, and memory biases. This is an important corrective to the popular idea that anxiety creates one single, uniformly distorted information-processing system. Different biases overlap only partly, and measurement matters.
Catastrophic Prediction and Risk Overestimation
Catastrophic prediction refers to jumping from uncertainty to an extreme negative outcome: a mistake will destroy a career, a physical sensation will become a medical catastrophe, embarrassment will be unforgettable, or one uncertain event means permanent loss of control. Risk overestimation is related but narrower: it involves judging a feared outcome as more likely than the available evidence warrants.
These patterns are common in cognitive models of several anxiety disorders, yet they are not universal diagnostic criteria for “anxiety disorder” as a whole. Their content is usually disorder-specific. The catastrophic thought in panic disorder often concerns the meaning or consequences of intense bodily sensations. In social anxiety it may concern humiliation or rejection. In a specific phobia it may concern the feared object or situation.
The useful clinical question is therefore not “Do I catastrophize?” but “What outcome is being predicted, how certain does it feel, what evidence is being used, what behavior follows, and does the pattern persist even when the threat is low or absent?”
Doubt, Uncertainty, and Indecision
Doubt can accompany anxiety because uncertainty keeps threat prediction open. A person may repeatedly reconsider a decision, re-read a message, seek additional information, or delay acting because no option feels sufficiently safe. Anxiety can make ordinary uncertainty feel as if it must be resolved before action is possible.
Doubt, however, is not a universal diagnostic criterion for anxiety disorders. It can arise from perfectionism, depression, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, low confidence, sleep loss, attention problems, decision complexity, or ordinary uncertainty. Its meaning depends on what the person is doubting and what they do in response.
A particularly important boundary is OCD. NIMH describes OCD as involving recurring intrusive obsessions, compulsions, or both. Persistent intrusive doubt followed by checking, mental review, reassurance-seeking, neutralizing, or ritualized attempts to obtain certainty can belong to an OCD pattern rather than being a generic cognitive symptom of an anxiety disorder. Our separate OCD vs GAD guide explains the diagnostic distinction between generalized worry, obsessions, and compulsions.
Repeated reassurance-seeking also needs context. Briefly asking for information during uncertainty can be ordinary. Repetitive reassurance that gives only short-lived relief and then has to be sought again may function as a safety behavior or, in OCD, as part of a compulsive cycle. The behavior should be understood by its function, not by the label alone.
Difficulty Concentrating and the “Blank Mind” Experience
Difficulty concentrating is one of the most common cognitive complaints associated with anxiety and is explicitly recognized by WHO and NIMH in their descriptions of anxiety and GAD. People may describe reading the same paragraph repeatedly, losing track of conversations, forgetting what they intended to do, making more small mistakes, or feeling that their mind “goes blank” under pressure.
One explanation is competition for limited working-memory resources. A meta-analysis by Moran combined 177 samples involving more than 22,000 participants and found that higher anxiety was reliably associated with poorer working-memory performance across several task types. The average relationship was modest rather than absolute, meaning anxiety can impair cognitive efficiency without producing the same deficit in every person.
The lived experience can be stronger than the laboratory average because real-world anxiety often arrives with other concentration disruptors: poor sleep, fatigue, muscle tension, repeated checking, emotional arousal, pain, caffeine or other substances, medication effects, competing demands, and the sheer time consumed by worry. Concentration difficulty may therefore reflect several interacting processes.
Can anxiety make you forget things?
Anxiety can make information harder to encode or retrieve when attention is occupied, so everyday forgetfulness can increase. That is different from saying anxiety causes a broad, uniform memory disorder. A meta-analysis by Mitte found no overall anxiety effect on implicit memory or recognition, while threat-related recall effects depended on experimental conditions. Memory findings are therefore more mixed than the evidence for worry, concentration difficulty, or threat-related attention.
When someone says, “My memory is terrible when I am anxious,” the most useful first question is often whether information was fully attended to in the first place. If attention was split between the task and threat monitoring, the later memory problem may partly reflect weak encoding rather than loss of stored information. Persistent or progressive memory change still deserves its own assessment rather than automatic attribution to anxiety.
Is “Brain Fog” a Cognitive Symptom of Anxiety?
“Brain fog” is an informal description, not a DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnosis. People use it to describe slowed thinking, mental fatigue, distractibility, trouble finding words, forgetfulness, or difficulty organizing thoughts. Anxiety can contribute to that experience through worry, divided attention, arousal, sleep disruption, and working-memory load, but the phrase itself does not identify a cause.
Brain fog is therefore a poor diagnostic shortcut. Similar complaints can occur with depression, sleep disorders, ADHD, medication or substance effects, infection and post-infectious illness, endocrine or metabolic problems, neurological conditions, pain, and many other states. The clinical task is to identify the pattern and cause rather than assume that the presence of anxiety explains every cognitive complaint.
A sudden, unexplained change in mental status is different from familiar anxiety-related distractibility. MedlinePlus advises emergency evaluation for sudden confusion, particularly when it is new or accompanied by other concerning symptoms. New acute confusion should not be self-labeled as “just anxiety.”
Racing Thoughts, Intrusive Thoughts, and Rumination
People often use “racing thoughts” to mean that many thoughts are arriving quickly during anxiety. The phrase is informal and non-specific. It can describe worry, rapid problem scanning, repetitive mental rehearsal, or several competing concerns. Because changes in thought speed also occur in other clinical contexts, the phrase should be unpacked rather than treated as an anxiety-specific symptom.
Intrusive thoughts are also not synonymous with anxiety. Unwanted thoughts can occur in the general population, in anxiety disorders, in depression, after trauma, and especially in OCD. What matters is the form of the thought, how unwanted it feels, what meaning is assigned to it, and whether it triggers compulsive responses.
OCD has its own diagnostic territory. If intrusive thoughts, images, or urges are recurrent and are followed by repetitive checking, mental rituals, reassurance, avoidance, or attempts to neutralize them, the pattern deserves an OCD-specific assessment. See our guides to OCD obsessions and OCD rumination for that boundary.
Rumination usually refers to repetitive thinking that circles around causes, meanings, consequences, or past events. Worry is more characteristically future-oriented. In real life they can overlap, and both can occur across diagnoses. The temporal direction of the thought is useful, but it is not sufficient by itself to diagnose a disorder.
How Cognitive Symptoms Differ Across Anxiety Disorders
Anxiety disorders share fear and anxiety, but they are not one cognitive syndrome. APA’s DSM-5-TR-based overview and the WHO ICD-11 CDDR preserve disorder-specific diagnostic requirements. The content of cognition therefore matters.
Generalized anxiety disorder
GAD is the disorder in which broad, persistent, difficult-to-control worry is most central. Concerns typically span multiple ordinary life domains rather than one circumscribed trigger. Difficulty concentrating can accompany the worry, but GAD requires a wider pattern and duration than a period of stress-related distraction.
Panic disorder
Panic disorder centers on recurrent unexpected panic attacks and persistent concern or behavioral change related to additional attacks or their consequences. Cognitive symptoms may include catastrophic interpretations of bodily sensations or fear of losing control, but panic disorder is not defined by generalized worry across everyday domains.
Agoraphobia
Agoraphobic cognition is tied to situations in which escape may feel difficult or help may not be available if panic-like or other incapacitating symptoms occur. Threat prediction is therefore situation-linked. Avoidance may become more visible than the internal thought content.
Social anxiety disorder
Social anxiety typically organizes cognition around scrutiny, negative evaluation, embarrassment, rejection, or visible signs of anxiety. Self-focused attention and post-event review are prominent in cognitive models, but the clinical diagnosis depends on persistent fear or anxiety in social situations and associated impairment.
Specific phobia
Specific phobia involves a circumscribed object or situation. Cognition may involve strong threat expectation, but the disorder is not defined by an endless range of worries. A named fear found online is not automatically a separate DSM-5-TR or ICD-11 diagnosis; many such terms map, when clinically relevant, to the broader specific-phobia category.
Separation anxiety disorder
Separation anxiety organizes fear and worry around separation from major attachment figures or feared harm to them. This is distinct from generalized anxiety even when the person experiences persistent “what if” thoughts.
Selective mutism
Selective mutism is characterized by a consistent failure to speak in particular social situations despite speaking in others. Anxiety can be intense, but the defining presentation is situational failure to speak rather than a specific set of verbalized cognitive symptoms.
Important Differential Diagnoses and Neighboring Concepts
Cognitive symptoms are among the least diagnostically specific mental-health symptoms. Worry, doubt, distractibility, negative predictions, and intrusive thoughts can all occur outside anxiety disorders. Good assessment therefore asks what else could explain the same experience.
OCD
OCD is not classified as an anxiety disorder in DSM-5-TR. Obsessions are intrusive and unwanted thoughts, urges, or images, and compulsions are repetitive behaviors or mental acts performed in response to obsessions or rigid rules. Anxiety can be part of the experience, but the obsession-compulsion relationship changes the diagnostic formulation.
PTSD and other trauma-related disorders
Trauma-related disorders have their own diagnostic framework. Hypervigilance, concentration problems, avoidance, and intrusive material can occur after trauma, but trauma-linked re-experiencing and the broader post-traumatic syndrome should not be collapsed into an anxiety-disorder label.
Illness anxiety and health-focused fear
Health worry can occur in many conditions and in ordinary life. Illness anxiety disorder has its own diagnostic territory within somatic symptom and related disorders. A person’s fear of disease should not be relabeled as generic anxiety solely because it involves worry or reassurance-seeking.
Depression and rumination
Depression can produce concentration difficulty, indecision, slowed thinking, negative expectations, and repetitive thinking. When low mood, loss of interest, guilt, hopelessness, or other depressive symptoms dominate, an anxiety-only explanation may miss the broader pattern.
ADHD and attention problems
Anxiety can reduce concentration, but ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder involving a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity with developmental onset. The time course is especially useful: attention that deteriorates mainly during periods of anxiety is a different pattern from longstanding cross-situational attentional difficulties beginning in childhood.
Neuroticism and trait anxiety
Neuroticism is a personality trait involving greater tendency toward negative emotionality; it is not an anxiety disorder. Trait anxiety is also a dimensional tendency rather than a diagnosis. Our article Neuroticism vs Anxiety: Personality Trait vs Emotional State and Disorder explains how enduring personality variation differs from an emotional state and from a clinical anxiety disorder.
Why Anxiety Can Make Thinking Feel Less Reliable
Anxiety changes the priority system of cognition. In a calm state, attention can be allocated primarily to the task in front of you. During threat anticipation, the mind gives more weight to uncertainty, possible errors, warning signals, and consequences. That priority shift can be adaptive when danger is real, because missing a threat may be costly. The same system becomes inefficient when it keeps allocating attention to low-probability or poorly defined threats.
The subjective consequence is often a loss of confidence in thinking. A person may know that they checked something but still feel uncertain, understand a paragraph but immediately doubt whether they understood it correctly, or make a reasonable decision and continue mentally reopening it. The feeling of uncertainty is real, yet it is not proof that the thought, memory, or decision is objectively unreliable.
This is also why trying to eliminate every anxious thought can become counterproductive. If the goal becomes absolute certainty, the mind can generate another possibility, another exception, or another reason to check. In some people this remains ordinary worry; in others it becomes a maintaining process in an anxiety disorder; in OCD it may become part of a compulsion. Function and pattern determine the meaning.
How Clinicians Assess Cognitive Symptoms of Anxiety
Formal diagnosis is broader than symptom recognition. APA’s description of DSM-5-TR emphasizes that diagnostic criteria are intended for trained professionals using clinical judgment and that other disorders and conditions must be considered. A cognitive symptom becomes clinically meaningful only in relation to history, context, associated symptoms, and impairment.
Assessment usually examines when the cognitive change began, whether it is continuous or episodic, the situations that trigger it, the content of worry or fear, how controllable the thoughts feel, what behaviors follow, whether sleep or substances contribute, whether medications or medical conditions may be involved, and how much the pattern interferes with work, school, relationships, or daily functioning.
The clinician also looks for the architecture of the syndrome. Broad difficult-to-control worry suggests a different pathway from unexpected panic attacks, a circumscribed phobic trigger, fear of scrutiny, trauma-linked intrusions, compulsive checking, longstanding developmental attention problems, or a major change in mood and energy.
Screening questionnaires can estimate symptom burden or indicate that further assessment may be useful. They do not convert a score into a diagnosis. The same concentration complaint, worry score, or anxiety severity score can arise from different conditions, and diagnosis requires clinical integration rather than threshold matching alone.
When Cognitive Symptoms Are More Likely to Reflect Ordinary Anxiety
Cognitive changes are often proportionate to circumstances. Before an examination, job interview, medical test, important conversation, financial decision, or unfamiliar event, it is normal for attention to narrow and future-oriented thinking to increase. If the response settles after the situation passes and functioning remains broadly intact, the pattern may represent ordinary anxiety rather than a disorder.
The clinical threshold becomes more relevant when worry or fear is persistent, excessive relative to context, difficult to control, associated with substantial avoidance or safety behavior, and disruptive across important areas of life. The exact threshold differs by disorder, so “I have cognitive symptoms of anxiety” is a starting description rather than a diagnostic conclusion.
What Can Help With Anxiety-Related Cognitive Symptoms?
The most useful response depends on what is driving the cognitive symptoms. When anxiety is situational and mild, reducing task load, protecting sleep, limiting repeated checking, writing down concrete next actions, and returning attention to one task at a time can reduce the secondary burden created by uncertainty and divided attention.
When worry or concentration problems are persistent or impairing, assessment can identify whether the pattern fits an anxiety disorder, another mental-health condition, a medical contributor, or several overlapping factors. Evidence-based treatment for anxiety disorders often includes cognitive-behavioral approaches and exposure-based methods, but the treatment target differs by disorder. The strategy for GAD is not identical to treatment for panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, a specific phobia, or OCD.
A useful goal is not to achieve perfect certainty or eliminate every anxious thought. It is to improve the ability to recognize threat realistically, tolerate uncertainty, shift attention when needed, make decisions with incomplete information, and continue meaningful action even when some anxiety remains.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the main cognitive symptoms of anxiety?
The most common cognitive experiences include excessive or repetitive worry, attention repeatedly captured by possible threat, negative interpretation of ambiguous situations, catastrophic prediction, doubt and indecision, and difficulty concentrating. Some people also report subjective forgetfulness, racing thoughts, or “brain fog,” but these are less specific and require context.
Can anxiety cause difficulty concentrating?
Yes. Difficulty concentrating is recognized in major clinical descriptions of anxiety and GAD, and meta-analytic research links higher anxiety with modest reductions in working-memory performance. Concentration difficulty is not specific to anxiety, so persistence, developmental history, sleep, mood, substances, medication, and medical factors matter.
Can anxiety cause brain fog?
Anxiety can contribute to an experience described as brain fog through worry, divided attention, sleep disruption, arousal, and cognitive load. “Brain fog” itself is an informal term and does not establish anxiety as the cause.
Can anxiety make you doubt everything?
Anxiety can amplify uncertainty and make decisions feel less secure, but pervasive doubt is not a defining symptom of every anxiety disorder. When doubt is intrusive and repeatedly triggers checking, mental review, reassurance, or other rituals, OCD becomes an important differential consideration.
Are intrusive thoughts a symptom of anxiety?
Intrusive thoughts can occur during anxiety, but they are not specific to anxiety disorders. Recurrent unwanted obsessions and compulsive responses are central to OCD, while trauma-linked intrusive memories belong to a different diagnostic framework. The thought’s form, content, trigger, meaning, and behavioral response all matter.
Is catastrophizing the same as anxiety?
No. Catastrophizing is a pattern of predicting extreme negative outcomes. It can occur in anxiety, depression, pain conditions, stress, and ordinary life. It is a cognitive process, not a diagnosis.
Can anxiety cause memory problems?
Anxiety can interfere with attention and encoding and can make everyday recall feel less reliable. Research on broad memory bias is mixed, however, and anxiety should not be assumed to explain persistent, progressive, or sudden memory change without assessment.
Does worry mean I have generalized anxiety disorder?
No. Worry is common and occurs across many disorders and ordinary life. GAD requires a broader clinical pattern involving excessive, difficult-to-control worry across multiple domains, a characteristic duration, associated symptoms, and clinically significant distress or impairment.
Can anxiety look like ADHD?
Both anxiety and ADHD can involve distractibility, task difficulty, and forgetfulness. Anxiety-related concentration problems often fluctuate with worry or threat, while ADHD requires a persistent developmental pattern with symptoms beginning in childhood. Comorbidity is also possible, so one condition does not automatically exclude the other.
When should I seek professional assessment?
Consider professional assessment when cognitive symptoms persist, intensify, interfere with work, study, relationships, sleep, or daily decisions, or when you are unsure whether anxiety is the correct explanation. Sudden unexplained confusion or an acute change in mental status should be treated as a medical issue rather than presumed to be anxiety.
Related Articles
References
Akbari, M., Sheikhi, S., Navab Safiadin, M. S., Rahmani, M., Forootan, R., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2026). A hierarchical uncertainty framework of anxiety: Preregistered meta-analytic structural model of intolerance of uncertainty and worry across anxiety disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 128, 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102773
American Psychiatric Association. (2026). What are anxiety disorders? https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/anxiety-disorders/what-are-anxiety-disorders
Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
Clauss, K., Gorday, J. Y., & Bardeen, J. R. (2022). Eye tracking evidence of threat-related attentional bias in anxiety- and fear-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 93, 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102142
Leung, C. J., Yiend, J., Trotta, A., & Lee, T. M. C. (2022). The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 89, 102575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102575
MedlinePlus. (2026). Confusion. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/003205.htm
Mitte, K. (2008). Memory bias for threatening information in anxiety and anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 886–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013343
Moran, T. P. (2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 831–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000051
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Generalized anxiety disorder: What you need to know. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/generalized-anxiety-disorder-gad
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Obsessive-compulsive disorder: When unwanted thoughts or repetitive behaviors take over. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/obsessive-compulsive-disorder-when-unwanted-thoughts-or-repetitive-behaviors-take-over
Newman, M. G., Llera, S. J., Erickson, T. M., Przeworski, A., & Castonguay, L. G. (2013). Worry and generalized anxiety disorder: A review and theoretical synthesis of evidence on nature, etiology, mechanisms, and treatment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185544
Shechner, T., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2016). Threat monitoring and attention-bias modification in anxiety and stress-related disorders. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416664341
World Health Organization. (2026). Anxiety disorders. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/anxiety-disorders
World Health Organization. (2024). Clinical descriptions and diagnostic requirements for ICD-11 mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240077263
Würtz, F., Kunna, M., Blackwell, S. E., Lindgraf, C., Abado, E., Amanvermez, Y., Margraf, J., Everaert, J., & Woud, M. L. (2026). Interpretation biases in anxiety: A three-level meta-analysis. Clinical Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026251392855