Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: Evidence and Practical Goals
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: October 9, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Cognitive remediation for schizophrenia is a structured behavioral rehabilitation approach that trains cognitive abilities while helping people apply useful strategies to everyday tasks. Programs may address attention, working memory, processing speed, verbal learning, planning, and problem-solving. Effective programs connect this practice to meaningful goals such as attending college, completing a workplace task, managing a daily routine, or participating in community life. Cognitive remediation is an evidence-based component of comprehensive care, with modest average benefits that should be understood in the context of individual needs and opportunities.
A person may experience cognitive difficulty even when psychotic symptoms have substantially improved. The person may understand an instruction but lose track of several steps, struggle to organize competing tasks, or find that a skill demonstrated successfully in a quiet office is much harder to apply in a busy setting. Cognitive remediation seeks to build usable cognitive strategies and reduce these barriers. A 2021 meta-analysis of 130 randomized studies found benefits in cognition and overall functioning, while a 2024 meta-analysis of follow-up studies found that some benefits persist after treatment.
The practical question is whether cognitive gains can improve life outside the clinic. This article therefore explains the intervention's mechanisms, program ingredients, evidence, expected size and durability of benefits, candidates, goals, limitations, and ways to measure outcomes. The general clinical overview of schizophrenia and the broader treatment pathway are covered in separate English Hub articles.
What Is Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia?
Cognitive remediation (CR) is a structured, learning-based intervention designed to improve cognitive processes and everyday functioning. It may use computerized exercises, therapist-led practice, paper-based tasks, strategy coaching, group discussion, or work in everyday environments. Its defining features are the therapeutic design, active facilitation, and goal-directed application of learning. Merely installing a game or asking someone to complete puzzles is not equivalent to a clinical cognitive remediation program.
An expert working group identified four core elements: repeated cognitive exercise, involvement of a trained facilitator, explicit development of cognitive strategies, and procedures that support transfer to daily life. Their consensus paper on cognitive remediation offers a framework for evaluating how programs are designed and delivered.
The intervention is used for people experiencing cognitive difficulties, including some individuals with a professionally established schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Its purpose is rehabilitation. It is not a test that establishes schizophrenia, an intervention that cures the disorder, or a replacement for treatments directed at hallucinations, delusions, severe mood symptoms, or relapse risk.
Why Cognitive Difficulties Matter
Cognition refers to the mental processes that enable attention, learning, memory, planning, decision-making, flexible thinking, and the organization of behavior. In schizophrenia, difficulties across these domains can affect daily participation. Some individuals experience marked impairment, while others experience relatively mild difficulties or have well-preserved abilities in particular domains. The pattern and impact must be assessed individually.
Processing speed affects how efficiently a person handles new information. Attention helps maintain focus and switch between demands. Working memory allows information to be held and manipulated briefly, as when remembering the next steps of a task. Verbal learning and memory support new knowledge and instructions. Executive functioning supports planning, prioritizing, monitoring errors, and changing strategy when a previous plan no longer works.
Consider someone entering a vocational training program. Following demonstrations may require sustained attention and processing speed; remembering instructions involves working memory; organizing a project relies on planning; responding to an unexpected change involves cognitive flexibility. Several modest limitations can interact even when the person has strong knowledge and motivation. A treatment program therefore benefits from targeting daily performance and opportunity for participation, not only isolated test scores.
Cognitive complaints also have multiple potential contributors. Poor sleep, depression, anxiety, substance use, medication effects, medical illness, sensory impairment, fatigue, and environmental overload can make concentration harder. Negative symptoms can reduce initiation of activities, while social barriers can prevent someone from demonstrating their skills. Clinicians should consider these influences rather than automatically attributing every difficulty to schizophrenia. The National Institute of Mental Health's schizophrenia overview places cognitive difficulties within the larger clinical picture.
How Cognitive Remediation Works
Cognitive Exercises and Gradually Increasing Challenges
Programs often provide repeated practice in attention, memory, speed, sequencing, reasoning, or problem-solving. Exercises are adjusted to support learning while offering achievable challenges. A person might practice identifying relevant information, remembering a sequence, monitoring errors, or switching between task rules. Feedback helps develop awareness of successful approaches. Improvement on a trained exercise is only an intermediate outcome: a meaningful program asks how that improvement can assist an actual activity.
Active Support From a Trained Therapist
The facilitator helps the participant reflect on what worked, test another strategy, recognize patterns of errors, and connect the activity to personal goals. Good facilitation also supports motivation, manageable pacing, accessibility, and a productive response to frustration. The 2021 JAMA Psychiatry review identified active and trained therapist involvement as an ingredient associated with stronger cognitive and functional outcomes.
Explicit Strategy Learning
A therapist may teach verbal rehearsal, chunking information into groups, making a stepwise plan, pausing to check work, or using a visual map. The participant tries alternative strategies and considers which is most useful in a chosen setting. Learning when to switch strategies is often more valuable than memorizing one technique. Strategies are chosen collaboratively and adjusted to the person's strengths, habits, and environment.
Transfer Into Ordinary Activities
Transfer occurs when a person applies a learned strategy in everyday life. Someone practicing sequential attention might use a step-by-step plan for cooking or a work assignment. Someone improving verbal memory might rehearse a short set of instructions before a class, then use a written aid where appropriate. A participant working on planning might organize transportation to an appointment. In coordinated care, rehabilitation specialists, educators, or employment counselors can help create appropriate opportunities for practice.
The link with psychiatric rehabilitation is important. Meta-analyses suggest that programs integrated with rehabilitation produce stronger or more durable functional outcomes than isolated training in many settings. These are findings across groups of studies, not proof that one brand of software works best for everyone. See the 2021 evidence review and 2024 durability review.
Does Cognitive Remediation Work? What the Trials Show
The strongest quantitative evidence comes from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials. In Vita and colleagues' 2021 analysis, 130 studies involving 8,851 participants with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders produced an average standardized improvement in global cognition of d = 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.24–0.34). For global functioning, the corresponding result was d = 0.22 (95% confidence interval 0.16–0.29).
A standardized effect size such as Cohen's d compares average outcomes in units of standard deviation. These findings are not percentages of patients who improve, IQ-point gains, or a guarantee that any particular person will recover independent living skills. The group-level cognitive improvement is generally considered small to approaching moderate; the average functional improvement is smaller. Small average effects can still matter when a chosen practical task becomes manageable, especially if support and opportunity are available.
The 2021 synthesis also reported a smaller average effect on overall psychiatric symptom severity (d = 0.14). Cognitive remediation should consequently be characterized primarily as a cognitive and functional intervention. It should not be advertised as a stand-alone means of resolving hallucinations, delusions, severe psychosis, or the causes of schizophrenia.
A 2024 American Journal of Psychiatry analysis assembled follow-up results from 67 randomized studies and 5,334 participants. It reported effects at follow-up of d = 0.23 for global cognition and d = 0.26 for global functioning. The studies differed in their follow-up duration, rehabilitation content, populations, and outcome measurement. Those results indicate average benefits remaining at measured follow-up periods; they do not establish permanent gains for every person.
A 2025 systematic review of randomized trials examined psychiatric symptom outcomes. It reported more consistent positive findings for negative symptoms and mixed findings for positive psychotic symptoms, mood, and anxiety. This evidence is less definitive for those secondary outcomes and should not change the primary goal of the intervention.
Which Program Features Are Most Important?
The 2021 meta-analysis identified stronger effects in programs that included an active therapist and explicit strategy development. Integration with psychosocial rehabilitation was particularly relevant to functioning. Additional analyses suggested that a longer program might support functional outcomes, but studies varied considerably and there is no single validated duration for every clinical setting.
The 2024 review found associations between lasting functional benefits and methods supporting transfer, rehabilitation integration, group delivery, and other program characteristics. These moderators are primarily comparisons across heterogeneous studies; they help guide service design but are not patient-level prescriptions. A program should be judged by the quality of its clinical method, how it responds to participants, and whether it measures functional change.
A trained therapist should explain how exercises relate to daily activities and monitor whether an exercise remains challenging but manageable. Programs that repeatedly train a cognitive task without helping the participant recognize and use strategies outside the clinic may produce limited real-world transfer. Conversely, combining strategy practice with actual educational, household, or vocational tasks makes the intended outcome explicit from the beginning.
What Professional Guidelines Say
The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for schizophrenia suggests cognitive remediation with a 2C rating. The number 2 denotes a suggestion, while C indicates low confidence in the evidence for that guideline statement. The wording reflects the evidence and guideline methodology available when it was prepared; more recent meta-analyses provide additional data that clinicians can consider.
The 2023 VA/DoD guideline for first-episode psychosis and schizophrenia evaluates psychosocial approaches and cognitive interventions within schizophrenia care. The NICE guideline CG178 offers a comprehensive framework for psychological, pharmacological, social, vocational, and long-term care. Guideline discussions and recommendation strengths should be read precisely rather than treated as interchangeable endorsements.
Cognitive remediation is appropriately considered alongside clinically indicated treatment and rehabilitation goals. Decisions about offering a program depend on the individual's functional challenges, informed preferences, symptom stability, access to qualified practitioners, and other services. Medication treatment, when indicated and prescribed, remains a separate clinical responsibility.
Who May Benefit From Cognitive Remediation?
People with schizophrenia who experience difficulties in attention, memory, learning, planning, or related cognitive functions that interfere with meaningful daily activities may be candidates. Someone wishing to work, return to school, strengthen independent living skills, or participate in relationships may reasonably discuss a referral. A person does not have to demonstrate the most extreme cognitive impairment to have a useful treatment goal.
The 2021 review included participants with varied levels of symptoms and functioning, and its moderator analyses did not support excluding people solely because they had more pronounced baseline difficulties. Still, averages cannot determine the treatment plan for one individual. A clinical team should assess cognition in context, identify potential contributors such as medication-related sedation or depression, and clarify what the person actually wants to change.
Programs can be considered in earlier and later phases of illness, but treatment timing should be individualized. During acute psychosis, severe disorganization, profound distress, or a medical emergency, stabilization and appropriate clinical assessment may take priority. Rehabilitation planning may resume as a person is able to participate. A clinical high-risk state or a psychotic symptom by itself never establishes a diagnosis of schizophrenia.
How a Typical Treatment Course Is Organized
The starting point is a collaborative functional assessment. A clinician asks what is difficult, what the participant wants to accomplish, and which cognitive processes may be involved. Structured tests may help clarify the pattern of strengths and weaknesses, but tests are interpreted alongside clinical history, environmental context, educational opportunity, and person-reported priorities.
Sessions commonly combine exercises with discussion of strategies and examples of how to apply them during the next week. A facilitator might ask the participant to compare approaches to planning a route, recalling instructions, or responding to a distracting task. The program then moves toward real activities chosen by the person, checking what happens in the actual environment and adapting the strategy where needed.
Delivery can be individual or group-based and may use computerized or other exercises. In the 2021 review, the mean treatment duration in included trials was approximately 15 weeks, but programs ranged widely. That average should not be turned into a universal requirement for a particular number of sessions or minutes. A service should explain its structure, expected effort, and how progress is reviewed.
At completion, the team may repeat appropriate cognitive assessments, review personally meaningful goals, and agree on ways to continue applying skills. Some people may use occasional boosters or additional support after changing jobs, homes, or educational settings. Rehabilitation should remain responsive to changing circumstances.
Practical Goals for School, Work, Home, and Relationships
School and Learning
An educational goal could involve remembering assignments, attending to class discussions, organizing notes, or following multistep instructions. Cognitive training might emphasize working memory, strategic note-taking, rehearsal, and self-monitoring. The participant can practice these strategies in real coursework and, where possible and desired, coordinate with educators or student-support services. School participation and achievement provide useful outcomes alongside test scores.
Employment
At work, cognitive challenges may affect task switching, response to instructions, pace, planning, or organization. Combining remediation with vocational services can create meaningful opportunities to apply strategies. A randomized trial of Individual Placement and Support with cognitive remediation in early psychosis directly examined this combined approach, although findings from one program cannot establish results for every employment setting or occupation.
Household Routines and Independent Living
Useful aims include organizing a shopping trip, preparing meals safely, keeping appointments, planning transport, or managing a routine. A therapist might combine cognitive exercises with a practical checklist, calendar, or environmental cue. Using an external aid is a valid form of compensation, and a more manageable routine can count as progress even when a standardized cognitive score changes only modestly.
Social Participation
Cognitive difficulties may make it hard to follow fast conversations, remember plans, or manage competing sensory demands. Strategy work can include pacing, requesting clarification, using reminders, or structuring participation in groups. Social cognition—the processes involved in understanding others' emotions and intentions—is related to general cognition but is a partly distinct treatment target. Some people may need specific social-cognitive or social-skills approaches alongside general remediation.
Recovery Goals
A personally meaningful goal might be resuming a music class, completing a training certificate, managing weekly groceries, or remaining engaged with friends. The therapist works backward from the chosen goal: which activities are difficult, what cognitive challenges may contribute, which practice strategies are relevant, and how can progress be observed? Recovery encompasses agency, health, relationships, and valued social roles. A fuller discussion is available in Can You Recover From Schizophrenia?.
Cognitive Remediation Versus CBT for Psychosis and Other Treatments
Cognitive remediation helps people learn and apply cognitive strategies. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp) has a different treatment focus, commonly addressing distress, coping, interpretations, and responses to psychotic experiences. The two interventions may complement one another within individualized care, but evidence for one should not be transferred automatically to the other.
Occupational therapy can focus on activities and practical adaptations, while supported education and employment services create opportunities for participation. Cognitive remediation may be integrated with these services. Social skills training and social cognition interventions address additional domains and should be distinguished when assessing a person's needs.
Antipsychotic medication can have an important role in treating psychotic symptoms and preventing relapse, with prescribing and monitoring handled by qualified clinicians. Cognitive remediation does not replace medication when medication is clinically indicated. Some medication adverse effects, sleep problems, mood symptoms, or physical conditions may contribute to complaints about cognition and should be reviewed in appropriate care. The schizophrenia treatment overview covers this larger plan.
Is It the Same as Brain Games?
Commercial brain games may offer practice, entertainment, or a convenient way to exercise particular skills. A therapeutic cognitive remediation program adds a functional assessment, trained facilitation, reflective strategy coaching, and an explicit plan for applying learning to daily life. Successful performance on a game can reflect practice with that game and does not alone prove gains in employment, education, or independent living.
Different clinical programs use different software and therapeutic techniques. The evidence from trials of structured interventions cannot validate an unrelated app simply because it uses similar words such as memory training or cognitive enhancement. Claims of a cure, guaranteed improvement, or replacement of psychiatric care should be regarded as unsupported.
First-Episode Psychosis and Earlier Treatment
Young people or adults in early-course care may be trying to resume education, enter work, and maintain social roles. Cognitive difficulties can interfere with these goals, and remediation may be considered within specialist rehabilitation and early-intervention services. A randomized trial following first-episode schizophrenia examined cognitive remediation alongside clinical treatment, with attention to cognitive and work or school outcomes.
First-episode psychosis describes a presentation that requires professional assessment of cause and context. It is not a synonym for schizophrenia. Psychotic symptoms can arise in different psychiatric, substance-related, medication-related, and medical conditions. Early-intervention care should therefore clarify diagnosis and safety, coordinate indicated treatment, and establish individualized goals rather than treating cognitive training as a universal initial procedure.
Measuring Progress Without Confusing Training With Recovery
Progress measures should include tests of untrained cognitive tasks where appropriate, along with real-world outcomes chosen with the participant. Improved speed on an exercise that has been repeated dozens of times may be a practice effect, whereas learning to manage actual course assignments or work demands is closer to the intended rehabilitation goal. Assessment can examine both, while considering the limits of each measure.
Clinicians may review attention, memory, processing speed, planning, and broader functional capacity, while the participant identifies relevant changes in home, school, work, or social activity. Environmental conditions matter: a person may learn a helpful strategy but lack transportation, accessible employment, housing stability, or an opportunity to use it. Such barriers should not be misidentified as cognitive treatment failure.
A review meeting can ask what activity was difficult before treatment, which strategy was learned, how often it was used outside sessions, which barriers remain, and what adjustments would help. Treatment can then be adapted to a realistic goal. Clinical ratings and standardized scores complement, rather than replace, the person's evaluation of participation and quality of life.
How Long Does Cognitive Remediation Last?
The 2024 meta-analysis found persistent average cognitive and functional benefits at observed follow-up points. It also linked better longer-term functional outcomes with characteristics such as programs integrated with rehabilitation and methods facilitating transfer to real-world settings. The follow-up periods and methods differed across studies, so those findings should not be presented as proof of lifelong effectiveness for any individual.
Continued use of strategies, supportive environments, and opportunities for meaningful activity may help sustain practical gains. A change of circumstances can introduce new demands that require additional coaching or accommodations. A plateau or a temporary setback may call for re-evaluation of goals and circumstances, rather than an assumption that the individual has failed.
Limitations, Burdens, and Safety
Cognitive remediation is generally considered a relatively low-risk psychosocial approach when delivered appropriately. Exercises can nevertheless cause fatigue, frustration, discouragement, or anxiety if demands are poorly matched to a person's current abilities. Travel, session schedules, costs, and access to technology can create significant practical burdens. Providers should adapt the pace and the approach and regularly ask whether the person feels the intervention is worthwhile.
Evidence is heterogeneous. Trials differ in methods, populations, intensity, active comparators, and outcome measurement. Some findings are affected by study size and other methodological issues. Group-average improvements are modest, and functional change depends on factors extending beyond cognition. There is no credible basis for predicting an individual's employment, independent-living outcome, or symptom course solely from a cognitive training score.
Access and equity are part of effective care. Financial resources, language, education, disability, social stigma, availability of trained clinicians, and digital accessibility can influence participation. Research conducted in specialist settings may not transfer fully to every routine service. The quality of the therapeutic relationship and integration with real opportunities should be assessed alongside outcome measures.
When Other Clinical Care Takes Priority
Sudden confusion, fluctuating consciousness, fever, new neurological signs, severe medication reactions, or rapidly changing mental status may indicate an acute medical condition requiring urgent assessment. New or rapidly worsening psychotic symptoms, suicidal intent, serious inability to meet basic needs, or possible catatonia also warrant prompt qualified clinical evaluation and potentially emergency care. A rehabilitation exercise is not an appropriate response to such situations.
Outside urgent situations, a care plan may need to address sleep, depression, anxiety, medication tolerability, substance use, physical health, psychotic symptoms, family preferences, and social barriers while supporting cognitive goals. A person should never stop or change prescribed antipsychotic treatment because of a cognitive training result. Longer-term monitoring and planning are discussed in the schizophrenia relapse article.
Questions to Ask Before Starting
Ask who delivers the program and what training they have received. Request a clear explanation of how cognitive challenges and goals are assessed, how strategies are practiced, and what support is provided to apply those strategies in ordinary settings. Ask how progress will be measured beyond the training exercises and how the program integrates with education, employment, or other rehabilitation services when relevant.
Discuss accessibility, number and length of sessions, costs, transportation, individual versus group options, management of fatigue or distress, and whether the goals can be revised. The participant's preferences and consent should guide treatment decisions. Family and supporters may assist with chosen activities when invited, while respecting privacy and personal autonomy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can Cognitive Remediation Cure Schizophrenia?
No. Research supports modest average cognitive and functional improvements, not a cure for schizophrenia. Cognitive remediation may improve useful skills within a comprehensive rehabilitation plan and should be selected according to individual goals and clinical needs.
Does Cognitive Remediation Treat Hallucinations or Delusions?
Its principal targets are cognition and functioning. Secondary symptom benefits have been reported in some studies, but evidence is weaker and less consistent for positive psychotic symptoms than for cognitive measures. Treatment of hallucinations, delusions, and relapse risk requires its own clinical assessment and indicated care.
Is Cognitive Remediation Helpful for Negative Symptoms?
Some studies and a 2025 review suggest beneficial effects on negative symptoms, but negative-symptom mechanisms and measurement are complex. Reduced motivation or expression may also involve depression, medication effects, or other contributors. CR should not be presented as an assured treatment for every negative symptom.
Does Everyone With Schizophrenia Need Cognitive Training?
No single rehabilitation service is appropriate for every individual. The decision depends on cognitive and functional assessment, priorities, accessibility, personal preferences, and the availability of other supports. The APA practice guideline frames CR as a suggestion, not an obligatory intervention.
Is a Computer Necessary?
No. Cognitive remediation may involve computerized tasks, therapist-guided exercises, paper-based activities, group work, and practice in ordinary environments. Its structured approach and connection to meaningful goals are central.
How Many Sessions Are Usually Required?
Programs vary widely, with an average duration around 15 weeks in the 2021 meta-analysis. That study average is descriptive and does not establish an ideal schedule for every patient. The provider should explain the treatment structure and how progress is assessed.
Can It Help Someone Return to Work or School?
It may contribute, particularly when combined with vocational or educational services that provide actual opportunities to apply strategies. Evidence supports modest average improvements; individual outcomes also depend on social context, accommodations, symptoms, and access to support.
Does It Replace Antipsychotic Medication or Psychotherapy?
No. Cognitive remediation is a specific rehabilitative intervention. Decisions about antipsychotic medication, CBT for psychosis, family services, and other care should be made separately with qualified clinicians according to the person's needs and preferences.
Conclusion
Cognitive remediation for schizophrenia is an evidence-based approach combining cognitive exercises, trained facilitation, strategy development, and transfer of learning into valued daily activities. Large randomized-trial syntheses support modest average improvements in cognitive performance and real-world functioning, including some persistence after treatment. The most practical outcome is a person's increased ability to participate in activities that matter to them.
Effective care defines a meaningful goal first, connects it to the relevant cognitive challenges, trains adaptable strategies, and creates real opportunities to use them. Progress should be judged by both appropriate assessment and the person's lived functioning. Cognitive remediation belongs within coordinated, recovery-oriented schizophrenia care.
Related Articles
Schizophrenia: Symptoms, Causes, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Recovery — The complete clinical overview.
Schizophrenia Treatment: Medication, Therapy, and Coordinated Care — The broader treatment framework.
Can You Recover From Schizophrenia? Outcomes and Long-Term Care — Real-world functioning and long-term goals.
Schizophrenia Relapse: Warning Signs, Prevention, and Care — Maintaining care and recognizing change.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2020). The American Psychiatric Association practice guideline for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.177901.
Bowie, C. R., Bell, M. D., Fiszdon, J. M., et al. (2020). Cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: An expert working group white paper on core techniques. Schizophrenia Research, 215, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.047.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014; reviewed 2025). Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: Prevention and management (CG178). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178.
National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Schizophrenia. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/schizophrenia.
Skokou, M., Stavridis, P.-D., Ntoskou-Messini, A., & Messinis, L. (2025). Cognitive remediation as a tool for enhancing treatment dimensions of schizophrenic symptomatology: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Brain Sciences, 15(10), 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101130.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense. (2023). Clinical practice guideline for management of first-episode psychosis and schizophrenia. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/mh/scz/index.asp.
van Duin, D., de Winter, L., Kroon, H., et al. (2021). Effects of IPS plus cognitive remediation in early psychosis: 18-month functioning outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Research, 236, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2021.07.025.
Ventura, J., et al. (2019). Cognitive remediation can improve negative symptoms and social functioning in first-episode schizophrenia: A randomized controlled trial. Schizophrenia Research. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6589092/.
Vita, A., Barlati, S., Ceraso, A., et al. (2021). Effectiveness, core elements, and moderators of response of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiatry, 78(8), 848–858. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0620.
Vita, A., Barlati, S., Ceraso, A., et al. (2024). Durability of effects of cognitive remediation on cognition and psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 181(6). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20230396.