Chronic Suicidal Ideation: Assessment, Treatment, and Support

Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 18, 2026 · Editorial Policy

Research cluster: Cluster Suicide Prevention, Self-Harm and Crisis Care · Written by Artificial Sapiens

Chronic suicidal ideation refers to recurrent or persistent thoughts about death, suicide, or ending one's life that extend across a substantial period of a person's experience. It is a clinically important description of the course of suicidal thinking, not a separate psychiatric diagnosis and not a measurement of how likely a particular person is to die. People may experience intermittent wishes not to wake up, repetitive thoughts of suicide that feel intrusive or exhausting, or periods of active consideration that fluctuate against a longstanding background of distress. The central clinical task is to understand what these thoughts mean for this person, what has changed from their usual pattern, and how immediate safety and sustained recovery can be supported. VA/DoD suicide risk guideline and NICE NG225 support individualized clinical assessment, collaborative safety planning, and continuing care.

Persistent suicidal thoughts deserve a direct, compassionate conversation even when they have existed for years. Duration cannot establish safety. A person with longstanding thoughts may have no current intent and remain engaged in treatment and relationships; another may experience a rapid transition to an acute crisis after a new loss, intoxication, severe agitation, or access to a lethal means. Care therefore has two connected time horizons: the immediate assessment of current intent, capacity to maintain safety, and need for urgent action; and a longitudinal plan that addresses the processes sustaining suicidal thinking, strengthens access to support, and revisits risk whenever circumstances change. VA/DoD 2024.

If you or someone with you is in immediate danger, has taken steps toward suicide, has recently attempted suicide, or cannot remain safe, contact local emergency services or go to the nearest emergency department now. In the United States, call 911 for immediate emergency response; call or text 988, or use the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, for 24-hour crisis support. Outside the United States, use the local emergency number or an established crisis service in your country. A trusted person can stay with someone while help is arranged and support a collaborative reduction of access to dangerous means.

Understanding Chronic Suicidal Ideation

What makes suicidal ideation chronic?

Clinical writing often uses persistent, chronic, longstanding, and recurrent suicidal ideation to describe thoughts that return repeatedly or remain present over months or years. No universally adopted duration threshold separates chronic from episodic suicidal thinking, and research studies define persistence differently. Some identify thoughts at several assessments; others examine daily reports or life-course trajectories. A history of thoughts at multiple visits is therefore a longitudinal observation requiring a clinical narrative rather than a stand-alone disease label. Duration, frequency, vividness, controllability, associated distress, behavior, and present intent each contribute different information.

The word chronic describes a time course. It should never imply that suicidal thoughts are unchangeable or that treatment has failed. Patterns can improve through effective psychiatric and psychological treatment, practical support, improved relationships, resolution of stressors, and new coping capacities. Sometimes thoughts remain while a person gains substantial agency, social connection, and ability to seek help early. Progress is evaluated through changes in ideation, suicidal behaviors, functioning, distress, hope, and the person's own goals, rather than requiring a single all-or-nothing endpoint.

Passive and active suicidal thoughts

Passive suicidal ideation generally involves wishes to be dead or not to exist without a current intention to act. Active suicidal ideation involves thinking about taking one's life, and the presence of active thoughts calls for a careful inquiry into intent, planning, preparatory behavior, and access to means. The terms describe features of thoughts rather than fixed categories of people. A person may alternate between passive wishes and active thoughts, and a passive presentation is never sufficient on its own to rule out clinical danger. NIMH ASQ clinical pathway.

Intensity, desire for death, ambivalence, and intent are related but distinct. Someone may be frightened by unwanted thoughts and strongly wish to live; another may have developed a specific intent even while reporting comparatively little observable distress. Clinicians should ask about the person's own language rather than assume that an endorsement on a questionnaire captures all these dimensions. The distinction is especially important when chronic thoughts are familiar enough that a person minimizes them or clinicians mistakenly regard them as routine.

Suicidal ideation, intent, attempt, and self-injury

Suicidal ideation concerns thoughts. Suicidal intent concerns a person's current or past intention to die by suicide. A suicide attempt is nonfatal self-directed potentially injurious behavior with at least some intent to die. Nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) refers to intentional injury of one's own body without suicidal intent; it may coexist with suicidal thoughts and requires assessment in its own right. The term self-harm is broader in NICE guidance, encompassing intentional self-poisoning or injury irrespective of apparent purpose. These definitions matter because outcomes, interventions, and documentation differ. NICE NG225 sets out the broad self-harm framework; the encyclopedia's Self-Harm and Suicide Attempts: Differences, Overlap, and Risk examines the behavioral boundary in depth.

A mental image, an intrusive unwanted thought, or an expression of despair does not by itself demonstrate intent. Conversely, a person's denial of intent during one interview should be interpreted in context, considering behavior, distress, changes from baseline, the interview setting, and available information. Ambivalence is common enough that a useful clinical dialogue makes space for both the wish to escape pain and the wish to remain alive. The assessment seeks an accurate shared understanding without converting a disclosure into punishment.

Chronic thoughts and an acute suicidal crisis

Chronic suicidal ideation may be the background against which an acute crisis develops. An acute crisis involves a current configuration of factors that can require urgent intervention: newly emerging intent, a specific actionable plan, preparatory behavior, inability to stay safe, marked agitation, intoxication, acute psychosis, severe loss of control, or an abrupt and significant change in circumstances. There is no universally reliable numerical threshold at which the transition occurs. VA/DoD 2024 distinguishes acute and chronic risk for management purposes and emphasizes clinical judgment.

The question is not simply how often the person has thought about suicide over the past year. It is also what happened today, this week, and since the last assessment; what is different from the person's usual experience; which protective supports are present in reality; and what can be done immediately. A longstanding history increases the need for a trusted, continuous system of care, while a change in present intent or ability to maintain safety can change the level of care within hours. The separate article Suicidal Crisis: How It Develops and Why Risk Changes examines the dynamics of crisis formation.

Clinical Significance and Research Measurement

Why the concept matters

Suicidal ideation is relevant to emergency care, outpatient psychotherapy, primary care, chronic illness services, youth mental health, and community supports. Recurrent thoughts may coexist with depression, trauma-related conditions, personality difficulties, persistent pain, substance use, loneliness, discrimination, and severe material insecurity. The presence of suicidal thoughts requires clinical attention regardless of whether a categorical psychiatric diagnosis is established. It may express intolerable psychological pain, perceived entrapment, difficulties regulating distress, a wish for relief, or several meanings at different times. Such functions are investigated with the person rather than assumed from a diagnostic label.

For clinicians, chronicity changes the organization of care. Repeated assessment without a durable therapeutic relationship can feel intrusive or hopeless; discharge from a service after an unchanged risk-scale score can disrupt treatment. A better response combines a formulation of longstanding vulnerabilities and strengths with explicit procedures for recognizing meaningful changes and coordinating appropriate treatment. NICE recommends a multidisciplinary review and an agreed care plan when self-harm is frequent or treatment has been ineffective. NICE NG225 recommendations 1.5.17 and 1.6.

Why population estimates are difficult

Epidemiological surveys commonly ask about thoughts of suicide over a defined interval such as the past year or across a lifetime. Those measures do not automatically quantify chronic ideation. Estimates differ according to wording, age, clinical setting, recall period, cultural interpretations, confidentiality, and whether a study measures passive wishes, active suicidal thinking, attempts, or all of these together. Repeated assessment may capture persistence but misses episodes between contacts; daily sampling improves temporal resolution while adding selection and response burdens.

The percentage of people endorsing suicidal thoughts cannot be translated into an individual probability of death. Suicide mortality is a comparatively rare outcome relative to reported ideation, and its causes are multifactorial. Statistical associations found in one population may be weak when transferred to a new clinical population or an individual's current circumstances. The appropriate inference from a positive report is that a responsive clinical conversation and, as indicated, additional assessment are needed. NICE evidence review on risk formulation.

Trajectories rather than a single severity ladder

A person may report steady low-level passive death wishes, waves of intrusive thoughts, episodes of escalating active ideation, or sudden spikes following specific events. These patterns are neither interchangeable nor necessarily arranged on a single severity ladder. Studies using ecological momentary assessment repeatedly sample experiences during everyday life and help show that suicidal and self-harm-related thoughts, emotions, and motivational processes can vary within individuals. The 2024 systematic review of ecological momentary assessment research framed through the integrated motivational–volitional model also identified variability and important gaps in measurement and prospective evidence. Ecological momentary assessment systematic review.

A clinical timeline can record the person's longer history, intensity and frequency of thoughts, changes in perceived controllability, sleep disruption, interpersonal events, new medications or substance use, and episodes of support-seeking. The purpose is to identify actionable patterns and reduce reliance on a single snapshot. Tracking should be collaborative and proportionate: repeated monitoring that increases distress or feels coercive may need to be modified, and a digital diary does not replace timely access to a clinician.

Explanatory Models and Maintaining Processes

Psychological pain, escape, and perceived entrapment

Several established theories examine why suicide becomes thinkable under conditions of severe psychological distress. Constructs including psychological pain, hopelessness, defeat, perceived entrapment, social disconnection, and difficulties imagining a tolerable future can help organize clinical questions. The integrated motivational–volitional model distinguishes processes associated with emerging suicidal thinking from those associated with movement toward suicidal behavior. Its constructs are research frameworks, and evidence varies across components, populations, and time horizons; an individual's crisis cannot be deduced solely from endorsement of a theoretical variable. EMA review of the integrated motivational–volitional framework.

For a person with longstanding ideation, perceived entrapment may take the form of recurrent beliefs that circumstances will never change, that distress is permanent, or that asking for help burdens other people. Treatment explores the actual conditions generating these beliefs, possible alternatives, and the experience of being understood. Financial, housing, employment, relational, and healthcare problems may require material or social interventions as well as psychotherapy. The explanatory model remains useful only insofar as it guides a response to real circumstances.

Emotion regulation and learned response patterns

For some people suicidal thoughts become an accessible mental response to shame, conflict, unbearable affect, or perceived abandonment. The thoughts may briefly communicate a wish to escape, organize attention around relief, or appear during intense dissociation. Repetition can strengthen the familiarity of that response without establishing that an attempt is inevitable. Therapy can map the chain from trigger to emotion, appraisal, urge, behavior, and consequence, then rehearse alternative responses and access to interpersonal support. This formulation is especially relevant to therapies addressing emotional dysregulation, including dialectical behavior therapy.

Individual histories vary. Chronic suicidal thinking does not imply manipulation, a desire for attention, or a uniform personality pattern. Dismissive labels can discourage disclosure and worsen therapeutic engagement. Clinicians can validate the severity of subjective pain while maintaining a precise examination of current intent and building specific behavioral alternatives. The Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Self-Harm and Suicidal Behavior article addresses DBT mechanisms and outcomes independently.

Cognitive processes and hopelessness

Repetitive negative thinking, catastrophic prediction, rigid conclusions about the future, self-criticism, and perceived lack of alternatives may sustain suicidal ideation. Cognitive interventions work with these patterns by examining evidence, expanding problem-solving options, identifying reasons for living that the person endorses, and testing small, achievable changes in daily functioning. Such work proceeds alongside practical responses to the circumstances that make hopelessness understandable. Thought content is considered in context: a belief about inescapable suffering can be related to poverty, illness, social exclusion, trauma, or relationship violence.

Evidence for cognitive therapies has been stronger on some suicidal behavior endpoints than on uniform removal of thoughts. In an early randomized trial among 120 adults recently treated after a suicide attempt, a structured cognitive therapy intervention reduced repeat attempts over follow-up compared with enhanced usual care, while differences in suicidal ideation rates were not significant at the assessed time points. That result underscores why a treatment's impact on attempts cannot be inferred from its impact on an ideation score, or vice versa. Brown and colleagues, 2005.

Biological, sleep, pain, and substance-related processes

Sleep disturbances, chronic pain, severe psychiatric symptoms, substance use, and acute intoxication can shape distress, impulse control, access to support, and the clinical urgency of suicidal thoughts. Biological models concern interacting systems rather than a validated single biomarker that diagnoses chronic ideation. A medical review may examine pain management, adverse medication effects, sleep disorders, metabolic or neurologic illnesses, and changes in psychiatric treatment. Physiologic and psychological explanations may operate together. When intoxication limits a person's capacity to participate, safety, medical assessment, and reassessment remain essential; clinical concern does not simply disappear when intoxication resolves.

Longitudinal care should address insomnia, substance use disorders, chronic disease, trauma exposure, and symptom exacerbations using relevant evidence-based services. A person who reports chronic suicidal thoughts during a severe depressive episode may require a different integrated plan from a person whose recurrent thoughts intensify with trauma reminders or social conflict. The status of each comorbidity and its treatment should be documented rather than presumed from the suicidal thought alone. VA/DoD 2024.

Social connection, adversity, and structural conditions

Experiences of isolation, stigma, bereavement, violence, discrimination, housing insecurity, unstable employment, and barriers to healthcare influence the context in which suicidal thinking develops and persists. Protective relationships, access to appropriate treatment, meaningful routines, and practical stability can make crises more manageable. These relationships are probabilistic at the population level and can be different within each person's life. A clinician should ask what the person's actual supports can provide, whether the environment is safe, and whether apparently available resources are accessible in language, cost, transportation, and timing.

Effective treatment sometimes requires direct assistance with benefits, housing, workplace accommodations, safety from interpersonal violence, disability supports, or culturally appropriate services. Such actions are integral to a biopsychosocial formulation and may be the condition that allows psychotherapy to become usable. The WHO's LIVE LIFE implementation guide situates suicide prevention across care services and wider community systems.

A Longitudinal Clinical Assessment

Begin with direct, respectful inquiry

A clinician can ask when thoughts first appeared, whether they occur daily or intermittently, which situations intensify them, and how the person experiences them. Direct questions about thoughts of death, thoughts of suicide, intention to act, current planning, any preparatory behavior, access to potentially lethal means, and recent attempts or self-injury establish a clearer picture than indirect reassurance. Questions should be understandable, culturally sensitive, developmentally appropriate, and adapted for communication needs. Privacy, informed consent, and the limits of confidentiality should be explained at the outset.

A disclosure is useful clinical information, not a breach of trust. Patients may have experienced repeated emergency referrals or punitive responses and may fear saying how they feel. Clinicians should explain how information will inform care, what will trigger urgent safety action, and how decisions are made together whenever possible. A trusting relationship helps detect shifts from a person's usual state. NICE NG225 emphasizes respectful psychosocial assessment and collaborative formulation.

Establish the person's baseline and the current departure from it

The baseline is a descriptive reference point, not a declaration of safety. It can include a typical frequency of suicidal thoughts, how much attention they occupy, the usual degree of intent, familiar precipitants, coping responses, and the resources normally available. Clinicians then compare the present week or day with that reference point. New intent, increased intensity, longer episodes, reduced ability to redirect attention, marked insomnia, agitation, withdrawal, intoxication, or steps toward acting can represent significant change.

Conversely, a person may report unchanged chronic passive thoughts while living with consistent protective relationships, engaging in treatment, and maintaining the capacity to seek help. This still requires a continuing care plan because circumstances and capacity can change. The longitudinal record should include previous episodes of heightened danger, interventions that helped, interventions experienced as harmful, and the patient's own account of what early change feels like. VA/DoD 2024.

Explore intention, behavior, capability, and immediate supports

Thought frequency alone cannot determine whether urgent intervention is necessary. Assessment considers current desire for death and intent to act; the specificity and immediacy of planning; recent preparatory actions; prior attempts; self-harm episodes; ability to cooperate in a safety plan; access to dangerous means; current judgment and intoxication; and whether another person or service can provide reliable support. The clinician also considers acute symptoms such as agitation, psychosis, mania, severe depression, and dissociation, without presuming that their presence establishes an individual's future outcome.

Collateral information from a caregiver, partner, or another clinician may clarify recent changes when obtained with consent or when legal and clinical duties require disclosure. A person's own account remains central. The action plan follows the combined evidence and professional judgment: same-day emergency assessment when acute danger is present, rapid specialist review when needed, or coordinated outpatient support when safety can be maintained with available resources. The detailed interview and disposition process is addressed in Suicide Risk Assessment: Clinical Interview, Context, and Decisions.

Risk factors, warning signs, and individualized formulation

Risk factors describe variables associated with suicidal outcomes across groups, such as previous attempts, psychiatric illness, trauma, and certain social circumstances. Warning signs concern potentially important changes, including new intent, marked agitation, abrupt isolation, acute hopelessness, or behavior suggesting preparation. Immediate clinical risk describes the present safety problem in context. These three concepts overlap but serve different functions. A formulation synthesizes relatively enduring vulnerabilities, current drivers, anticipated transitions, protective capacities, access to support, and a concrete management plan.

The formulation should be revisable. It asks what might amplify suicidal thinking over the next several days, what situations have preceded escalation, which responses can interrupt that pathway, and who is responsible for carrying them out. It also records uncertainty rather than disguising it as a precise percentage. NICE NG225, section 1.6 explicitly advises against using risk scales or global low/medium/high labels to predict suicidal behavior or decide who receives treatment or discharge. The VA/DoD chronic-versus-acute management framework is a clinical organizing aid, not a validated individual forecasting instrument.

Screening is a route to care, not a diagnosis

Tools such as the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and structured suicide inquiries can support recognition of patients needing further evaluation. The NIMH toolkit explains that a positive ASQ screen should lead to a brief suicide safety assessment conducted by a trained clinician, with additional evaluation or treatment according to clinical needs. ASQ is designed for medical patients age eight and older; if risk is suspected in a younger child, a full mental health evaluation is recommended rather than relying on a screening instrument. NIMH ASQ Toolkit.

Screening instruments measure responses to specified questions over a defined window. A screen does not establish chronic suicidal ideation as a psychiatric disorder, reveal all current intent, or predict who will die. Instruments can contribute to continuity when their limitations are understood, while a sensitive longitudinal interview and functional assessment remain necessary. Clinical services must establish a responsive care pathway before introducing widespread screening; detection without accessible follow-up can undermine trust.

Clinical documentation and shared decisions

A useful assessment note records the person's account of thoughts and intentions, relevant behavior, acute-versus-baseline changes, medical and psychiatric context, protective supports, means-safety considerations, consultation or collateral information, the reasoning behind disposition, a collaboratively developed safety plan, and arrangements for review. It distinguishes reported facts from clinical interpretation. The note also records what the person accepts or declines, how barriers were addressed, and who will make the next contact.

An agreed plan should be readable by relevant care teams while respecting confidentiality and applicable law. Documentation alone never substitutes for implementing the promised follow-up. For persistent ideation, continuity over months may matter as much as the detail of any single visit. NICE NG225.

Differential Assessment and Coexisting Conditions

Major depression and bipolar conditions

Depression can include hopelessness, anhedonia, impaired concentration, changes in sleep or appetite, and suicidal thinking. Chronic suicidal ideation can also be present outside a major depressive episode. Clinicians examine the longitudinal relationship between mood episodes and suicidal thoughts, including whether thoughts persist during euthymic periods, how treatment changes the pattern, and which stresses predict escalation. The presence of suicidal thoughts alone does not establish major depressive disorder. Depression-specific diagnostic assessment and evidence-based care remain necessary.

Bipolar disorders add important questions about past hypomania or mania, mixed mood symptoms, shifts in energy, severe agitation, sleep changes, medication exposure, and substance use. These may change near-term clinical decisions and treatment options. A chronic ideation-focused article should not subsume the distinct diagnostic and preventive management of bipolar disorder; the published Bipolar Disorder and Suicide Risk: Evidence, Warning Signs, and Care addresses that specific clinical context.

Trauma, personality functioning, and recurring interpersonal crises

Posttraumatic symptoms may maintain suicidal ideation through hyperarousal, nightmares, dissociation, shame, perceived danger, and disruptions in trust. Traumatic experiences and relational instability may also increase fear of disclosure or lead people to expect harmful responses from institutions. Trauma-informed practice seeks consent where possible, explains decisions, avoids unnecessary coercion, and works with the patient's pace while still acting when immediate safety requires it.

In some patients, persistent suicidal thinking co-occurs with severe emotion dysregulation, unstable relationships, or borderline personality disorder. Clinical care investigates the individual functions of ideation and behavior and provides structured evidence-based treatment rather than assuming intent from diagnosis. The canonical condition-specific analysis is BPD and Self-Harm: Risk, Safety Planning, and Treatment. Chronic suicidality is not synonymous with borderline personality disorder, and therapeutic continuity is relevant across diagnostic boundaries.

Obsessions and unwanted suicidal images

Obsessive-compulsive disorder can include recurrent, ego-dystonic images or thoughts involving self-harm that the person experiences as unwanted and frightening. This phenomenon can be confused with suicidal desire if clinicians rely only on the topic of the thought. Assessment explores the thought's relation to fear, reassurance seeking, compulsions, avoidance, desire to live, and any independent suicidal intent. Co-occurring suicidal ideation is also possible and deserves separate assessment. The published Suicidal OCD: Intrusive Self-Harm Thoughts, Compulsions, and the Difference From Suicidal Intent is the canonical source on the OCD-specific search intent.

A careful distinction supports appropriate treatment. Exposure and response prevention for OCD targets obsessional processes, whereas a collaborative suicide-focused care plan addresses actual suicidal desire, intent, and changing safety needs. Both issues may need attention at the same time, and neither should be inferred solely from the existence of vivid intrusive content.

Psychosis, substance use, autism, and chronic illness

Psychotic symptoms, intoxication, delirium, and severely impaired judgment can alter the meaning and urgency of suicidal statements. Immediate assessment may need to prioritize medical stabilization and protection. In autistic patients, communication differences, sensory overload, masking, burnout, coexisting mental health conditions, and previous negative healthcare experiences can affect assessment; standardized wording should be adapted without diluting inquiry into intent and safety. The population-specific evidence is treated in Suicide Risk in Autistic Adults: Evidence, Assessment, and Prevention.

Chronic pain and serious physical illness may contribute to persistent despair, disrupted sleep, activity limitations, dependency, and isolation. A sound care plan integrates pain specialists, primary care, psychiatric care, practical assistance, and rehabilitation. The clinician should also evaluate neurocognitive changes or medication effects when indicated. Complex comorbidity demands coordinated care and cannot be represented accurately by a single global risk score. VA/DoD 2024.

Treatment as an Ongoing Clinical Process

A shared formulation and staged goals

Treatment begins by collaboratively defining the problem that suicidal thoughts represent for the person, the circumstances that sustain it, the factors that precipitate acute shifts, and the outcomes the person most values. The first goals may be reliable safety, tolerable distress, renewed access to care, or reducing the frequency of suicidal crises; later goals may include stable relationships, return to education or employment, sleep recovery, trauma treatment, and a meaningful life beyond crisis management. The plan should separate immediate actions from the work that requires months of treatment.

An effective plan explains who coordinates care, how the person can obtain an urgent appointment, which treatment modality is being used, and what will change if symptoms intensify. It leaves room for patient preferences and adaptations. In NICE guidance on recurrent self-harm, multidisciplinary review, a designated coordinator, and a joint safety plan address this need for consistency. NICE NG225.

The therapeutic relationship as infrastructure

People with chronic suicidal ideation may have repeated a painful story to many providers and received conflicting advice. Reliable appointments, respectful inquiry, predictable clinical responses, and shared decision-making can restore willingness to disclose worsening symptoms. A therapist can acknowledge longstanding distress without treating the person as an emergency every time thoughts recur, while maintaining explicit criteria for urgent reassessment when intent or safety changes.

Consistency includes clinician teamwork. Care can become fragmented when emergency departments, inpatient units, outpatient programs, primary care, and family supports each assume another service is responsible. Documented handoffs, confirmed appointments, accessible safety plans, and follow-up contacts make continuity operational. Therapeutic optimism needs practical implementation: the patient should know who answers the telephone, what happens after hours, and who acts when a scheduled visit is missed in concerning circumstances.

Psychotherapies and Their Outcome-Specific Evidence

Dialectical behavior therapy

Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) combines behavioral analysis, mindfulness, distress tolerance, emotion regulation, interpersonal effectiveness, and a structured therapeutic hierarchy that prioritizes life-threatening behavior. Comprehensive DBT may include individual therapy, skills training, between-session coaching, and clinician consultation. It may be particularly useful when persistent suicidal thinking accompanies recurrent self-harm, severe emotional dysregulation, and unstable coping strategies. Skills teach alternatives to escalating distress while the therapeutic relationship attends to motivation and obstacles to treatment.

A randomized clinical trial of 173 high-risk adolescents found advantages of DBT over individual and group supportive therapy for suicide attempts, nonsuicidal self-injury, and overall self-harm at the end of active treatment. The groups' differences narrowed at later follow-up on some outcomes. This was a high-risk adolescent sample and does not establish that every adult with chronic thoughts will experience the same benefit, nor does it show reduced suicide mortality. McCauley and colleagues, 2018. Evidence in adults and adolescents should be interpreted by specific clinical population, treatment intensity, comparator, and endpoint.

For chronic suicidal ideation, DBT's clinical value may include reducing repeated crises, increasing tolerance for intense affect, addressing self-injury, and improving functioning. It should be offered by appropriately trained clinicians and adapted to the person's capacities. A promise of complete disappearance of thoughts in a fixed number of sessions would exceed the evidence. The encyclopedia provides the condition-independent intervention evidence in Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Self-Harm and Suicidal Behavior.

Cognitive-behavioral suicide-focused interventions

Suicide-focused cognitive-behavioral approaches examine how distressing events, interpretations, emotional responses, avoidance, hopelessness, and behavioral choices interact. They may use collaborative case formulation, crisis-response planning, problem-solving, skills rehearsal, relapse prevention, and work on specific beliefs related to suicidal behavior. Their target is often the sequence leading from a crisis to an attempt, rather than depression symptoms alone. The approach requires explicit attention to actual life circumstances and social supports.

In the randomized study by Brown and colleagues, 120 adults with a recent suicide attempt received cognitive therapy or enhanced usual care. A smaller proportion in the cognitive therapy arm made another attempt over 18 months, with a statistically significant difference, while group differences in measured suicidal ideation were not significant. The study supports a suicide-attempt prevention outcome in that enrolled population, subject to its sample size and follow-up limitations. It does not directly evaluate all people with persistent ideation and no history of attempts. Brown and colleagues, 2005.

The distinction between treatment of depressive symptoms and suicide-specific cognitive therapy matters. An intervention that improves mood can be valuable, but clinicians should still assess suicidal intent and behavior and provide explicit safety management. Treatment selection considers prior response, comorbidities, patient preference, accessibility, clinician training, and whether the full recommended approach is available.

Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality

Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) uses structured collaborative inquiry into the patient's personal drivers of suicidality, with a suicide-specific treatment plan and repeated review. It aims to make suicidal thinking a direct and shared clinical focus. The patient's description of psychological pain, hopelessness, stress, self-hate, and the reasons for wanting to live or die can guide a tailored therapeutic agenda. A collaborative framework may be relevant when a person with chronic ideation has previously felt assessed but not understood.

A 2021 meta-analysis including nine direct comparative studies found a modest advantage for CAMS on suicidal ideation and general distress, and greater treatment acceptability, relative to other active interventions. It did not find statistically significant advantages on suicide attempts or self-harm in the combined studies. Such findings justify describing CAMS as supported for certain ideation and engagement outcomes, while remaining precise about uncertain effects on attempts and mortality. Swift, Trusty, and Penix, 2021. Differences by sample and study design further constrain direct generalization to chronic ideation.

CAMS is a clinical framework rather than a synonym for generic empathy or any informal conversation about suicide. Adequate delivery involves trained practitioners, ongoing collaborative assessment, explicit tracking of personally meaningful drivers, and appropriate coordination with emergency and psychiatric services. Research involving college students, military personnel, and other groups should be interpreted in relation to the studied population.

Other psychotherapies and treatment integration

Other structured psychotherapies may be indicated for associated depression, trauma-related disorders, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, severe relational difficulties, or chronic pain. The clinical choice depends on the disorder-specific evidence and the person's needs. For example, appropriate treatment for obsessions should preserve the distinction between an unwanted suicidal image and an intention to act; trauma care should account for dissociation and fluctuating safety; family-based work may help when relational strain and communication are important drivers.

Combining treatments requires coordination. If different clinicians provide psychotherapy, medication management, and case management, an agreed risk formulation and communication plan reduces contradictory advice. The person should know which clinician owns suicide-related treatment decisions and what the backup arrangement is. Fragmented care can force patients to become their own case managers precisely when their functioning is most strained.

Safety Planning for Longstanding Suicidal Thoughts

A usable, collaborative plan

A safety plan is a brief, personalized document or accessible set of steps prepared with the person before an emergency arises. It identifies recognizable signs of worsening, feasible coping strategies, people and settings that help restore connection, trusted supporters who can assist directly, professional and crisis contacts, and collaborative actions to make the environment safer. It is reviewed after a crisis and whenever circumstances change. NICE NG225 recommendations 1.11.7–1.11.8.

A plan designed for chronic ideation should account for both the everyday baseline and the person's recognizable escalation pathway. Early signs may differ from those identified during a previous crisis. The plan can include specific steps for nights, weekends, travel, medication interruptions, conflict at home, or loss of access to a regular clinician. It should remain short enough to use under distress and accessible in a preferred language and format.

Safety planning is an active intervention within care, not a legal disclaimer or a contract promising that the person will not attempt suicide. A plan's effectiveness depends on the feasibility of its steps, the reliability of contacts, review, and access to emergency services. The companion scientific article Suicide Safety Planning: How Collaborative Safety Plans Work treats its independent intervention intent.

What the Safety Planning Intervention evidence actually shows

In a multicenter cohort comparison involving 1,640 adult Veterans Health Administration emergency-department patients discharged after suicide-related concerns without inpatient admission, the Safety Planning Intervention plus structured follow-up calls was associated with less suicidal behavior over six months and greater engagement with outpatient treatment than usual care. The analysis reported approximately 45% fewer suicidal behaviors in the intervention group. Because it was not a randomized comparison and involved a specific adult veteran emergency-care population, it should not be described as proof of a mortality effect or as a precise estimate for all people with chronic ideation. Stanley and colleagues, 2018.

For ongoing ideation, the transferable clinical principle is coordination: a personalized safety plan is maintained alongside therapy and actual follow-up contact, not offered as a one-time document. Evidence for safety planning as a stand-alone intervention in other populations and across different outcomes is heterogeneous; especially for young people, developmental adaptation and caregiver participation require separate evaluation.

Means safety without blame

Collaborative means-safety counseling explores how to create distance between a person in crisis and potentially lethal means while respecting privacy, dignity, and circumstances. It may involve a trusted supporter helping to arrange secure storage, modifying access during periods of increased danger, or seeking professional assistance with a safe environment. The clinician uses a calm, nonjudgmental conversation and explains why temporary barriers matter during a rapidly changing crisis. Specific methods or procedural descriptions of self-harm are unnecessary.

Means safety is one component of a broader plan that includes accessible treatment and immediate support. It should be reviewed when housing arrangements, relationships, medication supplies, or the person's current safety capacity change. The WHO identifies access reduction as a population-level prevention priority, while clinician-led counseling requires its own individual implementation and outcome analysis. WHO LIVE LIFE; VA/DoD 2024.

Medication, Medical Care, and Limits of Pharmacologic Evidence

Treat the diagnosed condition and assess suicidality separately

Medication can be appropriate for major depression, bipolar disorders, psychotic disorders, substance use disorders, or other diagnosed conditions. The rationale, monitoring, adverse effects, and treatment setting depend on the condition and medication. Prescribing decisions require medical evaluation and follow-up. Neither the persistence of suicidal thoughts nor a positive screening response alone identifies a universally indicated drug. A medication that improves depressive symptoms may contribute to wider recovery, but its effect on suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide death must be evaluated as separate outcomes.

In recurrent ideation, medication reviews may consider sleep, activation, agitation, adherence, alcohol and other drugs, drug interactions, and the possibility that clinical symptoms have changed. Changes in treatment can warrant closer contact when a person is already vulnerable. Services should integrate medication management with psychotherapy, safety planning, and practical support instead of assuming that one modality replaces the others. VA/DoD 2024.

Ketamine, esketamine, and endpoint distinctions

Research on ketamine and esketamine has examined short-term changes in suicidal ideation in selected clinical populations, including people with depressive disorders. A rapid decrease in an ideation score is a distinct endpoint from prevention of attempts or suicide deaths. The 2024 VA/DoD guideline addresses possible adjunctive ketamine infusion for short-term reduction of ideation with major depressive disorder and separately judges evidence insufficient to recommend for or against ketamine infusions or esketamine for reducing suicide attempts or death. Treatment involves specialist monitoring and attention to contraindications and adverse effects. VA/DoD 2024.

It would be scientifically unsound to turn a short-term treatment response into a general long-term cure for chronic suicidal ideation. Research populations, comparator conditions, timing of assessments, and follow-up duration must be considered. Likewise, conclusions concerning lithium or other condition-specific pharmacotherapies belong in the appropriate diagnostic context, with recognition that evidence for suicide mortality and for momentary ideation may be different.

Medical and psychiatric urgency

Severe agitation, acute psychosis, manic symptoms with loss of judgment, intoxication, medication-related deterioration, a recent attempt, or inability to maintain safety may call for urgent medical or psychiatric evaluation. Hospitalization may be necessary when danger cannot be managed safely in an outpatient setting, and the decision depends on individual assessment, available alternatives, legal and ethical requirements, and the least restrictive effective care. A chronic history by itself neither mandates admission nor justifies avoiding admission when a new emergency exists.

Following any emergency admission or discharge, the continuity plan should specify prompt contact, treatment access, communication between services, review of safety measures, and involvement of suitable trusted people. A discharge note or referral alone cannot guarantee that a person actually reached continuing care. NICE NG225 and VA/DoD 2024 emphasize assessment and management beyond a single setting.

Continuity of Care, Follow-Up, and Recovery

Make follow-up a clinical intervention

For a person with persistent ideation, follow-up is part of treatment. It provides opportunities to reassess changes from baseline, revise the safety plan, address barriers, manage associated conditions, and respond before a crisis becomes overwhelming. Missed appointments or loss of contact should trigger proportionate outreach based on the agreed care plan and current concerns. Services can arrange shared appointments, reminder systems, transportation support, or direct handoffs after transitions between care settings.

Research on brief contact interventions after suicide attempts indicates that continuity efforts may improve engagement or some suicidal-behavior outcomes in specific populations, but trials differ considerably in design and outcome. A multinational randomized study of brief intervention and contact after an attempt provides one line of evidence for active post-discharge support, while telephone-contact trials vary in timing and conclusions. These findings concern people following attempts and should not be converted into a universal estimate for longstanding ideation without attempts. Fleischmann and colleagues, 2008.

Recovery when thoughts have become familiar

Recovery may first appear as shorter periods of crisis, fewer attempts or self-harm episodes, increased use of coping strategies, restored sleep, improved relationships, or a stronger capacity to ask for help. For some patients, thoughts decline gradually; for others, fluctuations persist while functioning and felt control improve. Progress should be discussed with the person in concrete terms that matter to them, with recognition that symptom reduction and quality of life are complementary goals.

A longstanding symptom can become entangled with identity and expectations about the future. Collaborative therapy supports the possibility of change without demanding a performance of hope or punishing disclosures of worsening distress. Periodic review can ask what helps, what remains inaccessible, and which treatments should be continued, intensified, adapted, or replaced. The safety plan remains active during improvement because stressors and supports evolve.

People supporting someone with chronic ideation

Family members, partners, friends, and chosen supporters can help by listening without shaming, taking disclosures seriously, asking about current safety, and supporting contact with clinicians. They can learn the person's early warning signs, help access a collaboratively agreed safety plan, and assist with practical needs such as transportation or a medical appointment. They should not be expected to serve as the only crisis service, and their own boundaries, safety, and wellbeing matter.

Support is most effective when agreed with the person, adapted to privacy and consent, and coordinated with treatment. If someone expresses immediate intent or cannot stay safe, supporters should contact emergency services and remain with the person when safe to do so until qualified help arrives. When the situation is less immediate, arranging timely clinical assessment and consistent check-ins is valuable. The encyclopedia's published How to Help Someone Who Is Suicidal: Communication and Safety addresses the caregiver's immediate-response intent.

Adolescents and Developmental Context

Persistent suicidal thoughts in adolescence

Adolescent suicidal ideation must be assessed with attention to developmental stage, identity formation, peer relationships, school pressures, family circumstances, abuse or exploitation, neurodevelopmental differences, and access to appropriate care. A report of repeated suicidal thoughts is clinically important even when the young person minimizes their meaning. Changes in mood, school attendance, sleep, social involvement, and behavior can provide context, but none alone serves as a diagnostic test or prediction.

Conversations should include private age-appropriate opportunities to disclose thoughts, explanation of confidentiality and its safety limits, and assessment of safeguarding responsibilities. Parents or caregivers may be essential collaborators, but involvement should account for whether the home environment is safe and supportive. Clinicians and services follow applicable consent, child-protection, and mandatory-reporting requirements. The NIMH's youth suicide screening pathway explicitly recommends appropriate assessment following a positive screen. NIMH ASQ Toolkit.

Youth treatment evidence needs its own boundaries

In the 2018 McCauley randomized trial, comprehensive adolescent DBT showed treatment-end advantages for repeated suicidal and self-harming behavior in a selected high-risk sample. The findings encourage access to structured, family-aware, trained services where indicated. They do not justify assuming that every adolescent with persistent ideation needs the same intervention, that brief app-based safety planning independently prevents attempts, or that an effect on self-harm necessarily establishes reduced suicide mortality. McCauley and colleagues, 2018.

Plans for younger patients often require explicit coordination among youth, caregiver, clinician, school supports where appropriate, and crisis services. Developmentally appropriate treatment includes support for autonomy, safe disclosure, family communication, accessible appointment times, and monitoring of changing circumstances. It also recognizes that an unsafe household may require alternative safeguarding arrangements. NICE NG225.

Equity, Ethics, and Health-System Design

Avoid stigma and therapeutic exclusion

Chronic suicidal ideation may lead to repeated emergency presentations and negative interactions with services. Labels that suggest someone is exaggerating, seeking attention, or impossible to treat can undermine disclosure and continuity. Care can acknowledge fatigue among clinicians while insisting on professional respect, realistic workload, supervision, and clear pathways. Services must not deny treatment simply because suicidal thoughts are longstanding or prior interventions were only partially effective.

NICE recommends that decisions following self-harm focus on psychological and physical safety needs, not a global risk category used as a gatekeeper. It also calls for care coordination and multidisciplinary review when self-harm is frequent or existing treatment has not worked. Those principles are particularly important in complex recurrent presentations. NICE NG225.

Autonomy, confidentiality, and the least restrictive care

Suicide prevention involves both the patient's autonomy and the clinical duty to respond to serious danger. Collaborative decisions, clear explanation of risks and benefits, attention to capacity, and proportionate safeguards help preserve trust. Emergency action can be required when immediate safety cannot be maintained. The least restrictive effective care should be considered, including intensive outpatient support or crisis services where genuinely available and suitable; such alternatives must never be imagined when local capacity is absent.

Patients should understand what information may be shared and why. When appropriate, clinicians seek consent to involve a trusted person. Where legal obligations require disclosure, the clinician should explain the process as far as safety permits. A person who has repeatedly disclosed distress should not have to choose between silence and unpredictable care; transparency is a practical component of safety.

Digital tracking, online communities, and AI systems

Digital mood diaries, telehealth, crisis messaging, and structured self-management applications may offer ways to extend contact and facilitate timely support. They vary widely in purpose, clinical oversight, evidence, privacy practices, and emergency-response capability. An app that records suicidal ideation is not equivalent to a validated intervention, and a conversational AI companion cannot be assumed to provide clinical risk assessment or emergency coverage. Persistent ideation calls for an accountable human care pathway with procedures for escalation.

AI-driven risk prediction raises additional concerns about accuracy, bias, false reassurance, false alarms, transparency, and disproportionate surveillance. NICE's evidence review included machine-learning risk tools and ultimately recommended against use of prediction scales for suicide or repeated self-harm and against score-based exclusion from services. Research development should prioritize meaningful patient-centered outcomes and demonstrated clinical utility over classification accuracy alone. NICE evidence review G.

Community and public-health prevention

Persistent suicidal thoughts are affected by access to care, safety of environments, social connection, and economic conditions. Public-health action therefore complements individual treatment. The WHO LIVE LIFE framework identifies means restriction, responsible media practices, socio-emotional skills for young people, and early identification and support, supported by multisectoral coordination and surveillance. These interventions concern population systems and should be evaluated against population outcomes, not simply an individual's change in ideation score. WHO LIVE LIFE.

For someone living with chronic suicidal thoughts, practical access to primary care, specialist therapy, crisis services, housing support, and stable insurance or public funding may be central to safety. Institutions should evaluate waiting times, post-discharge contact, treatment dropout, crisis service coordination, and patient-reported barriers. A service that detects suicidal thinking without a viable route to care has left the principal clinical task unfinished.

Critical Appraisal of the Evidence

Different outcomes answer different questions

Suicidal ideation intensity, prevalence of self-harm episodes, frequency of suicide attempts, service engagement, and suicide mortality are separate outcomes. A therapy may reduce self-reported ideation without a demonstrated effect on attempts; another may reduce attempts while ideation scores remain statistically similar. This is not paradoxical. Thoughts, behaviors, opportunity, and protection are related through multiple pathways, and studies often have different sample sizes and observation windows for each outcome.

Brown and colleagues' cognitive therapy trial found a repeat-attempt difference without significant differences in ideation rates at specified assessments; the CAMS meta-analysis found ideation benefits without significant advantages on attempts or self-harm. The comparison makes endpoint-specific inference essential. Brown and colleagues, 2005; Swift and colleagues, 2021.

Chronicity is incompletely standardized in trials

Many suicide-related treatment trials enroll people after attempts, during emergency visits, within diagnostic groups, or following a positive screening response. Such samples do not perfectly represent people whose thoughts have persisted for many years without recent attempts. Follow-up may be too short to evaluate long-term patterns, and exclusion criteria can omit people with multiple comorbidities or limited access to services. Treatment results must be interpreted in light of these eligibility conditions rather than generalized across all experiences labeled chronic.

Research would benefit from transparent duration definitions, repeated measurements, patient-centered functional endpoints, documentation of baseline-versus-acute changes, improved representation of under-served groups, and long-term evaluation of continuity systems. Studies should report adverse experiences, not only apparent improvements, and distinguish emergency-service use caused by clinical need from access barriers or prior service practices.

Causality and prediction remain separate problems

A mechanism correlated with suicidal thoughts may not be a cause, and a change in a questionnaire score may not be a valid surrogate for suicide mortality. Acute risk may emerge rapidly, while many people with known risk factors never attempt suicide. Prediction research therefore cannot replace dialogue, professional judgment, collaborative planning, or universal access to safe care. The goal of assessment is to support responsive decisions under uncertainty, while evidence generation seeks to improve the quality and equity of those decisions. NICE NG225.

Practical Clinical Pathway

When the person is presently safe and willing to engage

An outpatient clinician can establish the history and current pattern of thoughts, assess intent and behavior directly, identify the individual's typical baseline and signs of escalation, evaluate coexisting medical and psychiatric conditions, and agree on a therapeutic formulation. The team then chooses accessible evidence-based treatment, prepares or revises a personalized safety plan, involves trusted supporters as appropriate, and schedules a definite follow-up. The plan includes an after-hours response and procedures for changes in safety. Any future deterioration triggers reassessment rather than an assumption that chronic thoughts are always stable.

When symptoms are worsening

Increasing distress, newly active suicidal thoughts, a recent loss, deteriorating sleep, growing isolation, intoxication, or reduced ability to use a safety plan call for prompt clinical reassessment. The response may include urgent same-day evaluation, additional contact, changes to the care setting, review of means safety, supportive involvement of a trusted person, and treatment of acute medical or psychiatric contributors. The urgency is based on current clinical findings and whether safety can be maintained, not the length of the person's history.

When immediate danger is present

Current suicidal intent accompanied by a feasible plan or preparatory behavior, a recent suicide attempt, severe impairment of judgment, or inability to remain safe requires emergency evaluation. Call the local emergency number or seek emergency department care. In the United States, use 911 for emergency response and 988 for suicide and crisis counseling. If it is safe to do so, remain with the person, enlist appropriate trusted support, and help reduce access to dangerous items while emergency care is being arranged. Do not rely on an online article, an AI conversation, or a future appointment when immediate action is necessary.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can suicidal thoughts last for years?

Yes. Some people describe recurring or near-continuous suicidal thoughts over long periods, though researchers do not use a single universal duration threshold. The clinical significance depends on current intent, accompanying behavior, changes in symptoms, personal circumstances, and capacity to maintain safety. Persistent thoughts merit professional care even when there is no present plan. VA/DoD 2024.

Does having chronic suicidal ideation mean someone will attempt suicide?

No individual course can be inferred from chronicity alone. Some people live with persistent ideation without making an attempt, while others experience episodes requiring urgent protection. Clinicians assess intent, behavior, context, protective supports, and changes over time. A statistical risk factor does not provide an individual prediction. NICE NG225.

Can thoughts be passive but still clinically important?

Yes. Wishes not to wake up or to cease existing can signal distress, depression, trauma-related difficulties, or other unmet needs. They should be discussed directly and respectfully. The absence of active intent at one encounter informs the present formulation but does not eliminate the need to address persistent suffering and reconsider safety when circumstances change.

What if the thoughts suddenly become more specific?

New intent, increased preparation, access to dangerous means, or difficulty remaining safe calls for urgent assessment. A person should follow an agreed safety plan and contact their clinician or crisis services immediately, using emergency services when danger is imminent. In the United States, 988 provides crisis counseling and 911 is the emergency number. 988 Lifeline.

Is chronic suicidal ideation a diagnosis?

It is a descriptive clinical concept referring to the course of suicidal thoughts. It is not a distinct psychiatric disorder. Clinicians evaluate any associated depression, bipolar disorder, psychosis, PTSD, OCD, substance use, chronic pain, neurodevelopmental needs, and psychosocial adversity according to appropriate criteria. A symptom can require active treatment even when diagnostic categorization is incomplete.

Can treatment help when prior treatment has not removed the thoughts?

Yes. A care review can revisit diagnosis, formulation, treatment fidelity, therapeutic fit, practical access, comorbid conditions, and the feasibility of follow-up. Evidence-based suicide-focused therapies, treatment of coexisting conditions, safety planning, and reliable relationships may improve meaningful outcomes. Improvement can involve fewer crises, better functioning, and increased ability to seek help, even before thoughts disappear completely. NICE NG225.

Should a family member monitor someone constantly?

A trusted supporter can help notice worsening symptoms, listen, offer practical support, and assist with agreed steps. Constant surveillance by a family member is rarely a sustainable substitute for professional care and can impair trust. The clinical team should establish appropriate levels of support, a shared crisis plan, and options for urgent help. When immediate danger exists, emergency services are needed.

Do suicide screening scales tell clinicians who is safe to discharge?

No. Screening identifies people needing further evaluation, and risk scores must not serve as stand-alone discharge or treatment eligibility rules. NICE explicitly advises against using scales or global risk categories to predict suicide or determine who receives care. The assessment must examine the person's needs, current condition, supports, and immediate and long-term safety. NICE NG225.

Clinical and Scientific Synthesis

Chronic suicidal ideation names a pattern of enduring or recurrent suicidal thinking that requires sustained, individualized attention. Clinical understanding comes from distinguishing thoughts from intent and behavior; establishing the person's longitudinal baseline; detecting acute changes; evaluating psychiatric, medical, relational, and material drivers; and translating formulation into usable treatment and safety decisions. The enduring nature of thoughts makes continuity, trust, and coordinated access to care especially important. The evidence supports selected suicide-focused therapies and follow-up interventions for specific populations and outcomes, while prediction and long-term effectiveness questions remain open.

The organizing clinical principle is ongoing collaboration: ask directly, respond to present danger, adapt care to the person's actual circumstances, and continue the therapeutic relationship long enough to support meaningful improvement. Persistent suicidal thinking is a reason to strengthen the pathway to competent help and recovery.

Related Articles

Suicide Risk Assessment: Clinical Interview, Context, and Decisions — Comprehensive clinical assessment, risk formulation, and disposition decisions.

Suicidal Crisis: How It Develops and Why Risk Changes — Dynamic escalation and near-term clinical assessment.

Suicide Safety Planning: How Collaborative Safety Plans Work — The structure and evidence for collaborative crisis safety plans.

Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Self-Harm and Suicidal Behavior — Intervention models and outcomes across patient groups.

What to Do If You Are Thinking About Suicide — Accessible immediate guidance for a person experiencing suicidal thoughts.

Suicidal OCD: Intrusive Self-Harm Thoughts, Compulsions, and the Difference From Suicidal Intent — Diagnostic assessment of unwanted intrusive suicidal content.

Suicide Risk in Autistic Adults: Evidence, Assessment, and Prevention — Autism-specific assessment and prevention considerations.

Suicidal Ideation: Meaning, Types, and Clinical Significance — Definitions and types of suicidal thinking, clinical assessment, and evidence-based safety considerations.

References

Adrian, M., Blossom, J. B., Chu, P., Jobes, D. A., and McCauley, E. (2021). Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality for teens: A promising frontline intervention for addressing adolescent suicidality. Practice Innovations, 7(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/pri0000156.

Brown, G. K., Ten Have, T., Henriques, G. R., Xie, S. X., Hollander, J. E., and Beck, A. T. (2005). Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 294(5), 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.5.563.

Fleischmann, A., Bertolote, J. M., Wasserman, D., et al. (2008). Effectiveness of brief intervention and contact for suicide attempters: A randomized controlled trial in five countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86, 703–709. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.046995.

McCauley, E., Berk, M. S., Asarnow, J. R., et al. (2018). Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents at high risk for suicide: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(8), 777–785. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1109.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2022). Self-harm: Assessment, management and preventing recurrence (NG225). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng225.

National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) Toolkit. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/research-conducted-at-nimh/asq-toolkit-materials.

National Institute of Mental Health. (n.d.). Adult outpatient brief suicide safety assessment guide. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/research/research-conducted-at-nimh/asq-toolkit-materials/adult-outpatient/adult-outpatient-brief-suicide-safety-assessment-guide.

Pistorello, J., Jobes, D. A., Gallop, R., et al. (2021). A randomized controlled trial of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) versus treatment as usual for suicidal college students. Archives of Suicide Research, 25(4), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2020.1749742.

Stanley, B., Brown, G. K., Brenner, L. A., et al. (2018). Comparison of the Safety Planning Intervention with follow-up versus usual care of suicidal patients treated in the emergency department. JAMA Psychiatry, 75(9), 894–900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1776.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (n.d.). 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. https://988lifeline.org/.

Swift, J. K., Trusty, W. T., and Penix, E. A. (2021). The effectiveness of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality compared to alternative treatment conditions: A meta-analysis. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 51(5), 882–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12765.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Defense. (2024). VA/DoD clinical practice guideline for assessment and management of patients at risk for suicide. https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/mh/srb/.

Winstone, L., Heron, J., John, A., Kirtley, O. J., Moran, P., Muehlenkamp, J., O’Connor, R. C., and Mars, B. (2024). Ecological momentary assessment of self-harm thoughts and behaviors: Systematic review of constructs from the integrated motivational–volitional model. JMIR Mental Health, 11, e63132. https://doi.org/10.2196/63132.

World Health Organization. (2021). LIVE LIFE: An implementation guide for suicide prevention in countries. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240026629.

World Health Organization. (n.d.). LIVE LIFE initiative for suicide prevention. https://www.who.int/initiatives/live-life-initiative-for-suicide-prevention.