Childhood Amnesia: Why We Forget Our Early Years
Author: Angela Bogdanova · Published: October 12, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Research cluster: Memory & Forgetting · Written by Artificial Sapiens
Childhood amnesia is the characteristic scarcity of autobiographical memories from the earliest years of life. Most adults remember little or nothing as a personally experienced episode from infancy, have few memories from roughly the first three to four years, and report increasingly numerous events from later childhood. The pattern develops gradually, varies between individuals, and applies primarily to later conscious recollection of personal events. It does not mean babies are unable to learn. Bauer's developmental synthesis (2015) and Hayne and Jack's review (2011) explain why both early memory formation and subsequent forgetting matter.
Why can't we remember being babies? The most complete current answer is that hippocampal–cortical memory networks, language, temporal understanding, self-representation, and conversational organization develop over years, while many early event memories become inaccessible before adulthood. Infants can form some hippocampal memories, as an important 2025 human neuroimaging study demonstrates. The question is therefore not simply whether an early event was encoded, but whether its representation can remain stable and accessible across a radically changing developmental system.
What Is Childhood Amnesia?
Childhood amnesia, often called infantile amnesia, is the underrepresentation of early-life autobiographical episodes in later conscious recall. An autobiographical episode is a particular experience that happened to oneself, with at least some information about the event, place, people, and temporal context. Autobiographical remembering eventually also involves placing episodes within a continuing story of one's life. Childhood amnesia describes a normal population-level pattern studied in developmental and cognitive psychology; it is not itself a DSM or ICD clinical diagnosis.
Researchers sometimes distinguish an especially sparse infantile period from a later childhood phase in which memories are available but disproportionately few compared with adult retention. These phases have gradual and method-dependent boundaries. The evidence does not establish one universal birthday at which autobiographical memory suddenly switches on. Hayne and Jack (2011); Bauer (2015).
Remembering that one attended a particular preschool is not necessarily the same as reexperiencing a specific morning there. One can possess autobiographical facts learned from parents or photographs without a retrievable first-person episode. That difference between personal knowledge and event recollection is essential when interpreting reports of a first childhood memory.
At What Age Do Our Earliest Memories Begin?
In adult studies, the earliest reported autobiographical memories often cluster around approximately ages three to four, with considerable variation. Some adults report seemingly firsthand experiences from around age two; others have little accessible recollection until five, six, or later. These ages describe the distribution of answers to research questions, not a clinical norm that each person must meet. Bauer and Larkina (2014); Peterson (2021).
The wording and procedure of an interview change the result. Asking for one “very earliest” memory may yield a later event than asking for several early memories across sessions. Participants may misdate an actual event; repeating a family story may strengthen familiarity without establishing firsthand recollection. Studies that compare reported memories against independent timelines show that estimates of the age of occurrence require scrutiny. Peterson's 2021 review emphasizes these methodological differences.
An adult's first reported memory is therefore neither the date their brain began learning nor a diagnostic measurement of their early development. Its age can change as different cues become available, and an event selected as “earliest” at one interview need not be the same event selected two years later. Peterson, Warren, and Short (2011) documented such changes in children's reports over time.
Can anyone truly remember being two years old?
Some early events dated around age two are reported in research. The challenge is deciding whether the date is reliable, whether details originated from the original experience, and how much later narratives contributed. A memory from age two is not ruled out by the general pattern; its evidentiary status depends on corroboration and source identification. A claimed event from infancy is harder to authenticate because the normal distribution of adult autobiographical recall is so sparse and the potential for reconstruction is substantial.
Babies Learn and Remember: What Childhood Amnesia Actually Affects
Infants recognize familiar voices, learn regularities, retain responses, and respond differently to familiar and novel stimuli. Researchers study these capacities through nonverbal recognition, preferential looking, deferred imitation, habituation, and conditioned responses. Such evidence establishes memory or learning in the infant task being measured. It does not automatically establish an enduring, narratable personal episode available twenty years later.
Human memory includes recognition, familiarity, procedural skills, learned associations, semantic knowledge, and autobiographical episodic recollection. These capacities can develop at different rates and rely on partly overlapping systems. A child may acquire a word or a motor routine without later remembering the single occasion when the learning happened. Confusing the absence of a childhood narrative with the absence of all memory gives a false picture of early development.
In Yates and colleagues' 2025 Science study, awake infants viewed pictures during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Activity in the infant hippocampus during encoding predicted later memory-related behavioral evidence. The result matters because hippocampal encoding is demonstrable during infancy. Its scope also matters: the study did not track the participants into adulthood to show that the pictured episodes would become verbally accessible decades later. Neural encoding, short-delay recognition, and adult autobiographical remembrance remain different outcomes.
Why Do We Forget the First Years of Life?
Modern explanations bring together changes in neural systems, memory stability, language, self-understanding, conversational practices, and accessibility of retrieval cues. Each account addresses a portion of the developmental trajectory. Their contributions are compatible in important ways, and no experiment has shown that a single process explains every missing early episode.
Development of the hippocampus and connected brain systems
The hippocampus helps bind details of an experience into a memory that can later be reconstructed. Its subdivisions, cortical partners, and connectivity change throughout infancy and childhood. Development affects the precision, integration, persistence, and later accessibility of event representations. A child may form meaningful memories while the system supporting long-term episodic recollection is still changing. A review of neural contributions to episodic memory development discusses these relationships.
Calling the infant hippocampus “immature” is a broad developmental description. Different tasks recruit different computations, and changing brain networks do not imply that infant memory is absent. The Yates et al. findings directly argue against treating failed adult recollection as evidence that infant hippocampal encoding never occurred. Investigators still need to explain what happens between formation of a trace and its potential retrieval many years later.
Childhood forgetting is faster than later forgetting
An important advance was to observe children's memories prospectively. Instead of asking adults to estimate the age of their first memory, researchers recorded events discussed when children were young and tested recall at later ages.
In Bauer and Larkina's prospective investigation, children discussed distinctive events with their mothers at age three. At subsequent tests, groups aged five to seven remembered at least 60% of the sampled events, while groups aged eight and nine remembered fewer than 40%. These are findings from that study's set of events and testing procedure; they are not percentages of every child's experiences or a measure of the total contents of the brain.
The implication is crucial: a child can remember an episode, describe it, and later lose access to it. Childhood amnesia develops during childhood itself. Reviews of prospective data emphasize that memory retention stabilizes gradually across development rather than emerging all at once. Bauer (2015).
Behavioral forgetting does not, by itself, reveal whether an original neural representation vanished, changed, became difficult to cue, or survived in a form not accessible through the test. Researchers must distinguish failure to retrieve from evidence of complete storage loss.
Language helps organize and retrieve personal events
Language allows children to describe people, locations, causes, intentions, and temporal order. It helps turn a fleeting event representation into a more coherent narrative that can be revisited later. Yet a child who gains language after an event may not gain new verbal access to all the information originally experienced.
Simcock and Hayne (2002) studied children's memory for a distinctive event before and after substantial language development. Children could demonstrate memory in appropriate forms, but their later verbal descriptions did not simply rise to match their newly acquired vocabulary; aspects of their accounts were constrained by language available at the time of the original event. This supports a role for language during encoding and later expression.
Language is one contributor to autobiographical development rather than a complete explanation for remembering. Preverbal infants show retention in nonverbal tests, and the ability to tell a convincing story does not guarantee that all details are preserved accurately. Nelson and Fivush's social-cultural developmental account describes how language interacts with memory, social understanding, and personal narrative.
An emerging sense of self and time
Autobiographical remembering involves understanding that a past event happened to oneself and can be placed within a continuing personal history. This capacity grows alongside self-recognition, awareness of personal continuity, event sequencing, and the ability to differentiate firsthand experience from information received from other people. Changes in self-organization may make early experiences harder to integrate into a later life story.
A young child's ability to tell what happened should not be equated with an adult's capacity for reflective autobiographical recollection. Memory, narrative, and self-understanding develop together rather than in strict isolated stages. Nelson and Fivush (2004); Fivush (2011).
Family reminiscing and social conversation
Parents and caregivers often help children construct personal narratives by asking what happened, who was present, and how the child felt. Elaborative, responsive conversations can support richer descriptions of the past and contribute to development of autobiographical storytelling. A comprehensive review by Fivush (2011) summarizes these social influences.
It is important to distinguish producing a richer story now from retaining an event for decades. Prospective findings do not support a simplistic rule that one parental conversation style mechanically determines which episodes persist into adulthood. Bauer and Larkina's longitudinal investigation reveals complex relations between early narrative behavior and later event memory. Parents need not feel responsible for a child's ordinary lack of infant recollections.
Neurogenesis and changes to memory circuits
In animal experiments, high rates of new-neuron formation in the developing hippocampus have been proposed to change how earlier memory traces are expressed. Akers and colleagues (2014) manipulated hippocampal neurogenesis in laboratory animals and observed effects on forgetting. The research supports a causal candidate mechanism under those experimental conditions.
Its limits are equally important. Animal learning tasks differ from the human adult's ability to recall a particular birthday party as part of their life story. The evidence does not prove that human childhood amnesia is entirely caused by new neurons, nor does it allow recovery of an individual's lost infant memory through a neurogenesis intervention.
Storage loss, latent traces, and retrieval failure
Whether early memories are erased, altered, inaccessible, or preserved in another form is an active research question. Alberini's 2026 developmental review examines models of enduring latent early-life representations and their interaction with later development. Animal evidence helps generate hypotheses about storage and access. A claim that every forgotten infant experience remains intact would go beyond present human evidence.
For any failed retrieval, several explanations remain possible: the event may have been encoded weakly; details may have been changed or lost; later experiences may interfere; retrieval cues may no longer match; or the representation may be poorly integrated with the later autobiographical self. Psychological experiments need special designs to distinguish these explanations. No universal mechanism has been established for all memories lost during early childhood.
How Researchers Study Childhood Amnesia
Retrospective studies ask older children or adults about their earliest events. They can describe the distribution, content, and subjective qualities of recalled episodes, but they depend on estimates of event age and are vulnerable to later reconstruction. Independent calendars, family records, photographs, and third-party dates sometimes help corroborate timing, though they do not authenticate every experienced detail.
Prospective studies begin closer to the original event. Researchers record a child's initial account and test the memory later. This design is more informative about whether an event once remembered subsequently becomes inaccessible. It has its own limitation: interviewing a child about a memory can rehearse that memory and influence its later survival. Bauer and Larkina (2014); Peterson, Warren, and Short (2011).
Infant behavioral experiments establish what can be remembered with age-appropriate nonverbal measures. Human neuroimaging investigates memory-related neural activity, such as hippocampal encoding in infants. Animal neuroscience allows causal manipulations of circuits but cannot measure the full phenomenology of a human life narrative. Combining these methods is necessary to avoid importing conclusions from one level of evidence into another.
How Autobiographical Memory Changes Across Development
In infancy, children acquire familiarity, expectations, learned associations, and some event information that can be tested nonverbally. In toddlerhood, language and representations of time begin to support descriptions of personal episodes. During preschool, many children can recount recognizable events, although retention, source identification, chronology, and narrative coherence are still developing. Later in childhood, autobiographical accounts become more stable and are increasingly integrated into an extended sense of personal history. Nelson and Fivush (2004); Bauer (2015).
The transitions overlap and vary. Research does not support a crisp progression in which the hippocampus turns on at three, language at four, and selfhood at five. Development is dynamic: different skills influence one another while life circumstances affect which particular events are distinctive, discussed, and later cued.
A child may remember a zoo visit accurately at five and fail to retrieve it at nine, while keeping generalized knowledge that their family visited that zoo. Generalized autobiographical knowledge and episodic scenes need to be distinguished when asking how much childhood is remembered.
Is Your Earliest Childhood Memory Accurate?
An earliest memory can correspond to a real occurrence and nevertheless contain changed details. Memories are reconstructive: each later account can draw on current knowledge, photographs, stories, and inference. People also estimate rather than directly sense the precise age at which a recalled event occurred. Peterson's 2021 synthesis emphasizes that earliest-memory dating depends on method.
Consider an adult who vividly pictures a yellow coat at a preschool birthday party. The party may have happened, but the coat might come from a photograph repeatedly seen later. The person may recall a genuine scene together with details supplied after the event. The vividness of the image does not independently establish where each detail originated.
Researchers therefore separate remembered experience, autobiographical facts, third-person family accounts, and imaginative reconstruction. Where event verification matters, contemporary records and independent sources are preferable to confidence alone. Corroboration of an event's occurrence still does not validate the complete content or subjective viewpoint of a later account.
Culture and Individual Differences
Earliest-memory reports vary across sociocultural settings. Families differ in how they talk about past experiences, which events they emphasize, and how individual actions are placed within broader social relationships. Peterson, Wang, and Hou (2009) studied Chinese and European Canadian schoolchildren and reported group differences in the quantity, age, and nature of earliest recollections. These findings describe studied samples, not fixed capacities of every person in either cultural group.
Individual variation may also involve language development, event distinctiveness, early opportunities for reminiscing, retention demands, and the cues used at interview. Such influences interact, and group associations should not be turned into claims that a family's culture or parenting style causes amnesia in an individual. Nelson and Fivush (2004).
Why Do Some People Remember Nothing Before Five, Six, or Seven?
The first-memory distribution is broad, and spontaneous recollection varies with context and questioning. Someone who initially reports “nothing before six” may later recall a classroom, neighborhood, or relative while remaining unsure when the event occurred. Others consistently report sparse early autobiographical episodes. Neither pattern, considered alone, yields a clinical diagnosis.
There is also a difference between few memories from the preschool years and new difficulty remembering recent conversations or familiar daily activities. Childhood amnesia describes early autobiographical retrieval. It cannot explain every form of forgetting across adolescence or adulthood. Assessment of a current functional memory problem requires attention to its onset, course, symptoms, and context.
Repeated pressure to force out an early scene is a poor way to establish what happened. A recollection may become more vivid through rehearsal without becoming more accurate. If the goal is family history, date-stamped photographs, diaries, and neutral conversations are useful historical aids; they should remain distinct from evidence that a particular firsthand episode was recovered.
Does Childhood Amnesia Mean Early Experiences Did Not Matter?
Early experience can shape behavior and learning without an adult remembering a specific moment. Children acquire their first language, relationships, routines, expectations, and practical skills through repeated interaction with the world. These developmental processes do not require a later autobiographical account of each individual episode.
The conclusion also has a boundary. One cannot infer a specific forgotten cause for every adult feeling, belief, relationship pattern, or symptom. Enduring effects of early experience and evidence about a particular event are different claims. Alberini (2026) discusses possible latent early-memory representations as an area of ongoing research, without providing a personal-history decoding method.
Childhood Amnesia, Trauma, and Repression
Early psychoanalytic accounts associated infantile amnesia with repression. Current research explains the broad developmental pattern through memory formation, rapid forgetting, neural maturation, and social-cognitive development. A review by Hayne and Jack addresses the historical explanations; Howe's 2024 analysis examines why childhood amnesia need not be explained by repression.
Sparse preschool recollection is not evidence that a traumatic event occurred. Equally, it is not evidence that adversity never occurred. The presence or absence of memories alone cannot establish an individual's childhood history or clinical condition.
Trauma-related recollections, PTSD, and dissociative amnesia belong to different evidence bases and clinical questions. The English Hub separately examines Childhood Trauma and Memory: Why Recall Can Be Clear, Fragmented, or Incomplete and Can Childhood Trauma Cause Memory Loss? Evidence, Limits, and Other Explanations. The developmental phenomenon discussed here does not itself establish any trauma diagnosis.
Can Childhood Amnesia Be Reversed?
No established intervention reliably restores a complete and accurate record of autobiographical experience from infancy. Family conversation, places, photographs, and records can offer cues or help reconstruct a timeline. They may also introduce later-acquired details that become incorporated into a seemingly firsthand memory.
Experimental reactivation and circuit-manipulation findings should be interpreted according to what was actually tested. Akers et al. (2014) examined animal mechanisms associated with forgetting, while Alberini (2026) reviews hypotheses about early latent representations. Neither establishes hypnosis, guided imagery, brain games, supplements, or any other consumer method as a validated way to recover a person's complete forgotten infancy.
When someone is distressed by uncertain memories, professional support can address present symptoms and concerns while separating corroborated facts from speculation. Repeated suggestive questioning or insistence that a particular forgotten event must have happened is not a reliable means of recovering history.
Can Parents Help Children Remember Their Early Years?
Warm, elaborative, nonleading conversation can support children's narrative development. Parents may ask what happened on an outing, whom the child saw, and what was interesting, allowing the child to supply details in their own words. Such conversations provide practice in making sense of lived events, as summarized by Fivush (2011).
These practices do not guarantee lifelong preservation of memories, and children do not need to be coached into a polished account. If accurate documentation matters, dated photographs, short written notes, and contemporaneous records preserve chronology. Adults can distinguish “what you told me then,” “what this picture shows,” and “what you now remember.” Avoid leading questions that reward expected details.
The aim is to help children discuss experiences naturally, not to defeat the normal developmental pattern of childhood amnesia. Bauer and Larkina (2014) provide important evidence that long-term forgetting cannot be reduced to one parental narrative habit.
What Is Still Uncertain in Childhood-Amnesia Research?
Well-supported findings include sparse adult recollection from early childhood, infant learning and recognition, hippocampal encoding during infancy, and greater loss of childhood autobiographical episodes over developmental follow-up. Multiple neural and sociocognitive influences are plausible and partially supported. Precisely how they interact to produce the long-term survival of any one event remains unsettled.
Researchers have not identified a universally applicable threshold age, a single erasure mechanism, or a method that can establish whether an inaccessible memory still exists as an intact representation. Longitudinal interviews may themselves influence later recall; human neuroimaging is correlational; animal circuit experiments do not directly study adult narratives. A strong explanation must respect these measurement differences. Bauer (2015); Yates et al. (2025).
Common Myths About Early Childhood Memories
“Babies cannot remember anything.”
Infants can learn and retain information, with memory measurable through appropriate tasks. The developmental phenomenon concerns the later accessibility of early autobiographical episodes. Yates et al. (2025).
“The first memory always begins at age three.”
The frequently cited age is an approximate description of an adult sample distribution. Individual reports and research methods produce substantial variation. Peterson (2021).
“A vivid childhood memory must be perfectly accurate.”
Vividness does not independently verify the event's date, source, or every detail. Family narratives and photographs can become part of later reconstructions.
“Missing infant memories prove hidden trauma.”
The absence of early episodic recall is common and does not identify a particular adverse event or clinical mechanism. Howe (2024).
“A memory exercise or hypnosis can unlock a complete infant archive.”
No high-quality evidence supports that promise. Better performance on a trained memory task is different from valid recovery of an uncorroborated historical event.
When to Seek a Professional Evaluation
Childhood amnesia alone is an expected developmental phenomenon. New or worsening difficulties remembering recent events, marked confusion, trouble with familiar activities, a head injury, seizures, or other neurological symptoms call for individualized medical assessment. Sudden serious neurological changes warrant urgent evaluation. An online test or an individual's earliest recalled age cannot establish a diagnosis.
If worries about childhood recollections lead to persistent distress, a qualified mental-health professional can address the present difficulty while respecting uncertainty about historical events. Clinical care and historical verification are different processes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why can't I remember being a baby?
Infants do form some memories, but the systems that support enduring autobiographical recollection develop across childhood. Rapid forgetting, neural development, language, self-related understanding, and retrieval all contribute. Bauer (2015).
What is the difference between infantile amnesia and childhood amnesia?
The terms often overlap. Some scientists use infantile amnesia for the especially sparse earliest interval and childhood amnesia for a broader gradual developmental scarcity. Neither designation is a diagnosis. Hayne and Jack (2011).
How early can a person remember?
There is no universal earliest age. Some accounts are dated around age two, while most adult earliest-memory studies find a concentration around the preschool years. The reliability of dating and the distinction between first-person recollection and family knowledge are essential. Peterson (2021).
Can a three-year-old remember an event and later forget it?
Yes. Prospective studies find that events once described by young children can become inaccessible to the same children at later ages. Bauer and Larkina (2014).
Can I have a real memory from age one?
One-year-olds demonstrably learn and retain information in some experimental tasks. A purported adult autobiographical recollection from age one is unusually hard to substantiate because dating, later family stories, and reconstruction may influence the report. It is best judged with available corroboration rather than a categorical rule.
Why do I remember a picture of a childhood event but not the event?
Remembering a photograph and remembering the underlying episode are different capacities. A repeated picture may provide details that are later integrated into an account without becoming independent proof of direct recollection.
Does childhood amnesia erase learned skills and knowledge?
The standard phenomenon mainly concerns later autobiographical event recollection. Skills, language, familiarities, and knowledge acquired early can affect life without a retrievable episode of their acquisition.
Is not remembering kindergarten normal?
Early childhood recollection varies considerably. A lack of an individual kindergarten memory is not diagnostic. Difficulties involving extensive later-life gaps or recent functional decline raise a broader question and may warrant professional evaluation.
Does language development explain all childhood amnesia?
Language contributes to encoding, organization, and later narrative expression, but neural maturation, rapid forgetting, self-development, and social conversation also matter. Simcock and Hayne (2002).
Does childhood amnesia mean my early life was unhappy?
No. A sparse early autobiographical record provides no independent evidence about whether an individual experienced happiness, adversity, or any specific event.
Can family stories help?
They can provide chronology and cues while also introducing details learned later. It is useful to distinguish firsthand recollection from an account one knows because someone else told it.
Will neuroscience eventually show whether infant memories are erased or hidden?
Human infant brain imaging and animal memory-circuit experiments are clarifying encoding and possible latent representations. There is not yet a general result showing one fate for all early autobiographical experiences. Yates et al. (2025); Alberini (2026).
Conclusion
Childhood amnesia is a normal developmental pattern of autobiographical forgetting. Infants and young children can encode and retrieve information, but many specific events from the first years become inaccessible later in life. Changes in hippocampal–cortical systems, event retention, language, self-understanding, social narratives, and retrieval together provide the strongest framework for explanation. The phenomenon is variable, cannot authenticate an individual's forgotten experiences, and does not imply that early learning was absent.
Related Articles
Childhood Trauma and Memory: Why Recall Can Be Clear, Fragmented, or Incomplete reviews the distinct scientific and clinical questions associated with trauma-related recall.
Can Childhood Trauma Cause Memory Loss? Evidence, Limits, and Other Explanations examines trauma, incomplete recollection, and differential explanations.
References
Akers, K. G., et al. (2014). Hippocampal neurogenesis regulates forgetting during adulthood and infancy. Science, 344(6184), 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248903
Alberini, C. M. (2026). Infantile amnesia: The forgetting that shapes our identity. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-111323-121324
Bauer, P. J. (2015). A complementary processes account of the development of childhood amnesia and a personal past. Psychological Review, 122(2), 204–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038939
Bauer, P. J., & Larkina, M. (2014a). Childhood amnesia in the making: Different distributions of autobiographical memories in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 597–611. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033307
Bauer, P. J., & Larkina, M. (2014b). The onset of childhood amnesia in childhood: A prospective investigation of the course and determinants of forgetting of early-life events. Memory, 22(8), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.854806
Fivush, R. (2011). The development of autobiographical memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131702
Hayne, H., & Jack, F. (2011). Childhood amnesia. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.107
Howe, M. L. (2024). Early childhood memories are not repressed: Either they were never formed or were quickly forgotten. Topics in Cognitive Science, 16(4), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12636
Nelson, K., & Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review, 111(2), 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.486
Peterson, C. (2021). What is your earliest memory? It depends. Memory, 29(6), 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2021.1918174
Peterson, C., Wang, Q., & Hou, Y. (2009). “When I was little”: Childhood recollections in Chinese and European Canadian grade school children. Child Development, 80(2), 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01275.x
Peterson, C., Warren, K. L., & Short, M. M. (2011). Infantile amnesia across the years: A 2-year follow-up of children's earliest memories. Child Development, 82(4), 1092–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01597.x
Riggins, T., et al. (2020). Empirical evidence supporting neural contributions to episodic memory development in early childhood: Implications for childhood amnesia. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8291724/
Simcock, G., & Hayne, H. (2002). Breaking the barrier? Children fail to translate their preverbal memories into language. Psychological Science, 13(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00442
Yates, T. S., et al. (2025). Hippocampal encoding of memories in human infants. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adt7570