Can Neurotic People Change? Personality, Habits, Therapy, and What Research Shows
Updated: Oct 1
Author: Ukrainian Psychological Hub · Published: September 30, 2026 · Editorial Policy
Yes. Many of the states, habits, coping patterns, and symptoms that people casually describe as “neurotic” can change, and measurable personality traits can change too. The scientifically useful answer, however, begins by translating the label. “Neurotic person” is not one psychological construct. It can refer to temporary stress, repeated worry, rumination, reassurance seeking, avoidance, self-criticism, emotional reactivity, a high score on the personality trait neuroticism, symptoms of a specific condition, or simply someone another person finds tense or difficult. Those are different targets with different evidence and different routes to change.
Research no longer supports the simple idea that adult personality is fixed. Longitudinal studies show continuing personality development, intervention studies show measurable trait change, and clinical research shows that changes in broad traits can accompany treatment. At the same time, personality traits are relatively stable compared with momentary states and narrow behaviors. Change is usually better understood as shifts in patterns and probabilities across time than as erasing a personality and replacing it with a new one.
If you are using the word “neurotic” to understand yourself, start with the distinction developed in Am I Neurotic? How to Understand the Label Without Self-Diagnosing. If you are asking why the pattern feels stronger now, Why Am I So Neurotic? Stress, Personality, Learned Patterns, and Mental Health owns that causal self-understanding intent. This article focuses narrowly on change: what can change, what personality research actually shows, what therapy can target, and where the evidence remains limited.
Can Neurotic People Change? The Short Answer
A person can change substantially in how often they worry, how quickly they recover from stress, how much reassurance they seek, how rigidly they try to control uncertainty, how harshly they criticize themselves, and how they respond to emotionally difficult situations. Those changes can matter enormously even when the person still recognizes some of the same temperament or personality tendencies in themselves.
Broad personality traits can also change. A 2026 meta-analysis of 229 longitudinal studies with 230,492 participants found significant individual differences in personality-trait change across the lifespan, with neuroticism showing the most pronounced individual differences in change among the traits examined. That finding means people do not all follow one fixed personality trajectory. It does not mean that everyone will change in the same direction or by the same amount. Haehner and colleagues (2026) provide the current large-scale longitudinal evidence.
Intervention research points in the same general direction. A major meta-analysis of 207 intervention studies found changes in personality-trait measures over an average of about 24 weeks, with emotional stability—the opposite pole of neuroticism—showing the largest change among the broad trait domains examined. Changes were observed across experimental and nonexperimental designs and persisted in follow-up samples beyond treatment. The authors also found that therapy type was not strongly associated with the amount of trait change. Roberts and colleagues (2017) is one of the central syntheses behind the modern claim that personality traits are stable but not immutable.
The most accurate one-sentence answer is therefore: yes, change is possible, but the word “neurotic” is too imprecise to tell you what is changing.
First, Separate the Everyday Label From the Thing That Might Change
Everyday label
In ordinary English, “neurotic” can be used loosely for behavior that seems unusually worried, tense, preoccupied, rigid, emotionally reactive, or anxious. Cambridge Dictionary documents this contemporary usage. A dictionary tells us how the word is used; it does not establish a clinical construct. The English Hub therefore treats the word as search language that needs translation rather than as a diagnosis or a stable identity.
For a fuller semantic explanation, see What Is a Neurotic Person? Meaning, Traits, Behavior, and Modern Psychology and Neurotic Behavior: Meaning, Examples, and What It Does Not Diagnose.
Emotional state
Someone can be more worried, irritable, self-conscious, vigilant, or emotionally reactive during a difficult week, a period of sleep disruption, a relationship conflict, a health scare, a demanding transition, or sustained stress. A state can shift within hours or days. Calling that temporary state “my personality” can make a reversible situation feel more permanent than the evidence supports.
Habit or behavior pattern
Repeated worry, avoidance, overpreparing, checking, reassurance seeking, procrastinating around uncertainty, or self-criticism can become learned patterns. A habit is narrower than a personality trait and often appears in particular contexts. The English Hub article Neurotic Habits: What People Mean and When a Pattern Deserves a Closer Look focuses on that level.
Personality trait
Neuroticism is a measurable personality trait describing relatively enduring individual differences in negative emotionality and stress reactivity. It is not synonymous with the everyday adjective “neurotic.” The article Neurotic Personality: What People Mean and How It Differs From Neuroticism explains that boundary in more detail. Evidence about neuroticism can answer questions about trait change. It should not automatically be projected onto every person whom someone happens to call neurotic.
Symptom, risk factor, screening result, diagnosis, and clinical disorder
A symptom is an experience or behavior, such as persistent worry, low mood, panic, intrusive thoughts, sleep disturbance, or compulsive behavior. A risk factor changes the probability of an outcome but is not the outcome itself. A screening score estimates whether further assessment may be useful. A diagnosis is a clinical classification based on defined criteria and context. A clinical disorder involves a specific syndrome and usually some combination of distress, dysfunction, duration, or other diagnostic requirements. These categories cannot be collapsed into the word “neurotic.”
The same visible behavior can arise from different processes. Repeatedly asking a partner for reassurance might reflect ordinary insecurity, relationship conflict, anxious attachment, obsessive-compulsive processes, a reaction to an actual breach of trust, or another situation entirely. Repeated checking can be a habit, a safety behavior, part of OCD, or a practical response to real risk. The behavior alone does not diagnose the mechanism.
Neurosis
Neurosis is a historical and clinical concept with its own intellectual and diagnostic history. That history does not define the present article. Modern searchers often use neurotic without intending the historical category, and the question “can neurotic people change?” is usually about current behavior, personality, distress, or self-understanding rather than the genealogy of neurosis.
Personality Stability Is Not Personality Immutability
Personality traits are called traits because they show meaningful continuity. If a person is relatively more emotionally reactive than peers at one point in adulthood, they often remain relatively more reactive later. That stability is real and scientifically important. It does not imply a frozen score, an unchangeable destiny, or a fixed amount of distress.
Two kinds of change can occur at the same time. Mean-level change refers to average shifts in a population as people age or move through developmental periods. Individual change refers to how one person’s trajectory differs from another person’s. The 2026 lifespan meta-analysis found significant individual differences in change across all traits and across the lifespan, with particularly pronounced individual differences for neuroticism. This is precisely why “personality is stable” and “personality can change” are compatible statements.
A large adult panel study following people from ages 19 to 74 also found continuing trait development across adulthood, including average decreases in neuroticism with age, while noting that cohort differences may partly contribute to that pattern. Milojev and Sibley (2017) therefore supports continuing adult change without implying that aging automatically makes every individual less neurotic.
What Intervention Research Shows About Personality Change
The strongest answer to “can personality change on purpose?” comes from intervention research rather than from lifespan observation alone. The evidence is now broad enough to reject the idea that personality can only change through decades of passive maturation.
Clinical and nonclinical interventions can coincide with trait change
The Roberts et al. meta-analysis aggregated 207 studies that measured personality traits during interventions. Across an average intervention period of about 24 weeks, trait measures changed meaningfully, and emotional stability showed the largest change among the broad domains. The finding replicated across different study designs and was visible beyond the immediate end of treatment. This does not prove that every therapy directly rewrites personality. Clinical symptoms, states, behaviors, self-perception, and trait measures can move together, and the mechanisms remain an active research question.
A key YMYL distinction follows from this evidence: therapy is not a treatment for a colloquial identity called a “neurotic person.” Therapy treats identifiable problems and processes. Trait change may occur alongside improvement in those targets.
Intentional personality change has been demonstrated outside traditional therapy
In a randomized controlled trial of 1,523 adults, participants used a three-month smartphone-based personality-change intervention. People in the intervention condition reported greater changes in the directions they wanted than people initially assigned to a waitlist. Observer ratings from friends, family members, or partners also detected some intended changes, although observer effects were smaller and were not significant for participants trying to decrease a trait. Changes persisted to a three-month follow-up. Stieger and colleagues (2021) provides unusually strong experimental evidence that normal-range personality traits can move in desired directions over months.
That trial included several Big Five change goals, and reducing neuroticism was the most common goal selected by participants. The headline effect sizes in the paper combine change goals across traits, so they should not be presented as if they were neuroticism-specific effect sizes. This distinction matters when translating broad personality-change research into an answer about neuroticism.
The 2026 intervention literature is promising, but heterogeneous
A 2026 systematic review focused on neuroticism and related constructs in nonclinical populations identified 99 eligible articles and 125 interventions and developed a taxonomy of 19 intervention strategies. The review found wide variation in what researchers targeted, how constructs were measured, which theories guided interventions, and which mechanisms were proposed. It therefore supports the reality of an intervention literature while also showing why simple claims such as “this one technique lowers neuroticism” outrun the evidence. Wright and colleagues (2026) explicitly emphasize the need to distinguish levels of change and to test mechanisms more systematically.
What Research Shows Specifically About Neuroticism
Neuroticism deserves its own answer because it is the precise personality construct most often confused with the casual word neurotic. Higher neuroticism means a stronger general tendency toward negative emotionality and stress sensitivity across situations and time. It is measured dimensionally: people vary along a continuum.
Evidence that neuroticism itself can change comes from lifespan studies, personality-change interventions, and clinical studies that repeatedly measure the trait. The evidence does not require treating high neuroticism as a disease. A trait can matter psychologically and remain part of normal personality variation.
Clinical treatment can be accompanied by reductions in measured neuroticism
A recent randomized study of the Unified Protocol followed 70 adults with an emotional disorder across six or twelve sessions. Neuroticism changes did not differ between duration conditions during the first six sessions, but participants in the full twelve-session condition showed greater reductions from weeks seven through twelve. When depressive and anxiety symptoms were controlled, significant neuroticism reductions still appeared in sessions seven through twelve for the full-treatment condition. Stumpp and colleagues (2026) interpreted the pattern as suggesting that longer treatment may be needed for lasting trait-level change.
This is a clinically specific finding in a small sample of adults with emotional disorders. It should not be generalized into a rule about everyone described as neurotic, and it does not mean that twelve sessions is a universal threshold for personality change.
Recent nonclinical work is starting to study why people differ in change
A 2026 smartphone-intervention study of 446 German-speaking adults examined whether self-efficacy and growth mindset predicted change during a six-week intervention and follow-up. Higher self-efficacy predicted larger decreases in self-reported neuroticism and larger increases in emotional resilience, while growth mindset did not show consistent predictive evidence. Week-to-week analyses also found reciprocal associations between self-efficacy and subsequent neuroticism. Krämer and colleagues (2026) adds a plausible mechanism-level clue: perceiving change as feasible may matter for some people.
This is emerging evidence, not a settled law of personality change. The study does not show that low self-efficacy causes permanent high neuroticism, and it does not establish one universal mechanism for everyone.
Habits Can Change Without Rewriting Your Entire Personality
One of the most useful consequences of separating levels is that meaningful improvement does not require a total personality transformation. A person can remain temperamentally sensitive while becoming less trapped in worry. They can still dislike uncertainty while checking less. They can still care intensely about relationships while asking for reassurance less often. They can still react strongly at first while recovering more quickly.
Patterns often hidden inside the neurotic label include worry, rumination, catastrophizing, self-doubt, avoidance, repeated checking, reassurance seeking, overpreparation, perfectionistic rules, control attempts, and harsh self-criticism. Neurotic Thinking: Worry, Rumination, Catastrophizing, and Self-Doubt examines several cognitive patterns, while Neurotic Behavior: Meaning, Examples, and What It Does Not Diagnose keeps the behavioral label separate from diagnosis.
Specific patterns can become more flexible even if a broad trait score changes only modestly. Conversely, a trait score can shift without every habit changing in the same direction. The 2026 systematic review on neuroticism interventions is useful here because it distinguishes broad traits, context-linked habits, and momentary states as related but different intervention levels.
States, Habits, Traits, and Symptoms Change on Different Timescales
Momentary states can change quickly. A person can become calmer after a threat passes, after sleep, or after a stressful interaction resolves. A narrow habit generally requires repeated experiences in which a different response becomes available and useful. Broad trait change reflects a wider shift across situations and time. Clinical symptoms can improve quickly for some people and more slowly for others depending on the condition, severity, treatment, context, and measurement.
These timescales help explain an experience that otherwise looks contradictory: someone can feel dramatically better before their personality score changes much, or report personality change while still having difficult days. Change is not a single switch.
The Wright et al. review describes possible top-down and bottom-up paths among traits, habits, and states, but it also makes clear that the comparative effectiveness of different levels and the mechanisms connecting them are not yet settled. A plausible model is that repeated changes in states and habits can accumulate into broader trait change, while changing broad interpretations and goals can alter lower-level responses. Research is still testing when each route operates.
Can Therapy Change Someone Who Feels “Neurotic”?
Therapy can change many problems that a person might casually call neurotic, but good treatment starts by naming the actual target. Persistent worry is not the same target as compulsive checking. Self-criticism is not the same target as panic. Relationship reassurance is not automatically OCD. Emotional reactivity is not automatically a personality disorder. The treatment question becomes clearer when the label is translated into a specific process, symptom pattern, or diagnosis.
The intervention meta-analysis by Roberts et al. shows that personality measures can shift during psychological interventions, especially emotional stability. The Stumpp et al. study shows that neuroticism itself can decline during a transdiagnostic treatment for emotional disorders under some conditions. Together, these findings make trait change a legitimate outcome to study. They do not justify offering “treatment for a neurotic person” as if the phrase were a diagnosis.
Therapy may be useful even when the goal is not to lower a trait score. A person may care more about sleeping, working, enjoying relationships, tolerating uncertainty, or spending less time in repetitive worry than about whether a personality questionnaire labels them high or low on neuroticism. Functional improvement can be a more meaningful outcome than identity change.
Treatment claims should follow the construct actually being treated. If recurrent intrusive thoughts and compulsions are the problem, the relevant evidence base belongs to obsessive-compulsive disorder, not to a generic neurotic label. The English Hub’s OCD overview owns that clinical territory.
Does Change Mean Becoming a Different Person?
Usually, no. Personality change is better understood as a shift in recurring patterns than as replacement of the self. A person can keep their values, memories, relationships, humor, preferences, and characteristic style while becoming less reactive to uncertainty or less likely to spiral into self-criticism.
This matters because the everyday neurotic label often bundles strengths and costs together. Sensitivity to possible problems can support preparation. Concern about relationships can reflect investment in connection. Careful anticipation can be useful in high-stakes situations. The difficulty arises when a pattern becomes rigid, costly, exhausting, or disconnected from the actual level of threat. The question is not whether every trace of sensitivity should disappear.
For a fuller discussion of costs, context, and possible strengths, see Is Being Neurotic Bad? Costs, Context, and Possible Strengths.
Can Age Change Neuroticism?
On average, some longitudinal studies find decreases in neuroticism across adulthood. The Milojev and Sibley cohort-sequential study of more than 10,000 adults found age-related decreases in neuroticism, although the authors noted that cohort effects may partly contribute. The newer Haehner et al. meta-analysis adds an important qualification: individual differences in change remain significant across the lifespan. Average development never tells you exactly what will happen to one person.
Age therefore creates opportunity for development rather than a guarantee of improvement. Some people become calmer, others face periods of greater stress or vulnerability, and many show mixtures of stability and change across different periods of life.
Can Major Life Events Change Personality?
Life events can coincide with personality change, but the popular story that marriage, parenthood, divorce, a new job, or another major transition automatically transforms a personality is too simple. A preregistered meta-analysis of 44 studies, 89 samples, and 121,187 participants found reliable but relatively small and event-specific personality changes. Effects were larger and more consistent for work-domain events than for love-domain events. Bühler and colleagues (2024) provides the strongest synthesis here.
Life events may change routines, roles, expectations, stress exposure, relationships, and repeated behavior, which can create conditions for personality development. Yet two people can pass through the same nominal event and change differently because the meaning, duration, context, resources, and behavioral consequences of the event differ.
Why Change Can Be Real Without Being Linear
People often imagine successful change as a smooth line: less worry each week, fewer setbacks, increasing confidence, then a permanently calmer personality. Psychological change rarely looks that tidy. Stress levels vary. Old cues return. A relationship conflict can reactivate reassurance seeking. A deadline can revive checking. Fatigue can reduce emotion regulation. None of those fluctuations, by themselves, reveal whether a broader trajectory is improving.
This is another reason to separate state from trait. A difficult day can raise negative affect without reversing months of change. A calmer month can occur because circumstances improved without indicating a durable personality shift. Researchers need repeated measurement precisely because single snapshots can be misleading.
What Seems to Support Change—and What Is Still Uncertain
The evidence supports several broad conclusions. Intentional change is possible for at least some people. Repeated intervention over weeks or months can produce measurable shifts. People differ substantially in how much they change. Broad traits, habits, and states are related but should not be treated as interchangeable. The mechanisms responsible for enduring neuroticism change remain incompletely understood.
The newest evidence on self-efficacy is especially interesting because it moves beyond asking whether change occurs and asks who changes more and why. Higher self-efficacy predicted greater improvement in the 2026 Krämer et al. study. But that result comes from one intervention context and one sample. It is a strong reason to study perceived feasibility further, not a reason to tell someone that belief alone will change their personality.
The Wright et al. review reaches a similar methodological conclusion from a broader literature: interventions use many strategies and target many related constructs, and research still needs better alignment between theory, target, mechanism, and measurement. The next phase of the science is therefore less about proving that any change is possible and more about identifying which changes are durable, for whom, through which processes, and under which conditions.
What Meaningful Change Can Look Like in Everyday Life
Suppose someone describes themselves as neurotic because they spend hours replaying conversations. Meaningful change might mean noticing the replay earlier, spending less time in it, and returning attention to what matters. Their emotional sensitivity may remain recognizable while the rumination becomes less dominant.
Suppose another person says they are neurotic because they repeatedly ask whether a partner is angry. Change might mean tolerating uncertainty long enough to gather information, asking a direct question once rather than many times, and allowing reassurance to end rather than restarting the loop. Whether that pattern belongs to ordinary insecurity, attachment anxiety, OCD, or another problem requires context; the visible behavior alone does not settle it.
Suppose someone calls themselves neurotic because they become distressed by small mistakes at work. Change might mean keeping high standards while reducing catastrophic interpretations, recovering more quickly after errors, and spending less time on redundant checking. That is meaningful psychological change even if the person still scores above average on neuroticism.
Suppose someone mainly becomes reactive during periods of overload. Their most important change may come from reducing chronic stressors, restoring sleep, changing an impossible workload, improving conflict patterns, or treating a specific condition rather than trying to alter a trait. The label can hide a context problem.
A Better Question Than “Can I Change My Neurotic Personality?”
The best question is specific: what pattern do I want to become more flexible, and what evidence applies to that pattern? This changes the task from identity judgment to psychological description.
Instead of “I am neurotic,” describe what happens. Do you worry about many future outcomes? Rehearse conversations? Avoid uncertainty? Check repeatedly? Ask for reassurance? Become overwhelmed by criticism? Assume the worst after ambiguous messages? Set standards so rigid that ordinary errors feel threatening? React strongly and then recover slowly? Each description is more informative than the label.
If you are unsure whether the label fits at all, How Do I Know If I’m Neurotic? Signs, Limits of the Label, and Better Questions to Ask explains why no checklist of colloquial behaviors can turn the word into a diagnosis.
When Professional Help Makes Sense
Professional help becomes more relevant when the underlying experience is persistent, distressing, difficult to control, or interfering with sleep, work, study, health, relationships, or daily functioning. The reason to seek help is the burden or pattern you are experiencing, not the fact that someone used the word neurotic.
A clinician can help separate a broad personality tendency from current stress, learned coping patterns, and symptoms of a specific disorder. That distinction matters because evidence-based assessment and treatment are organized around actual constructs and conditions.
If a pattern is new, unusually intense, rapidly worsening, or accompanied by major changes in sleep, energy, perception, substance use, physical health, or functioning, a broader clinical or medical assessment may be appropriate. Again, the aim is to clarify what is happening rather than to validate a personality label.
What the Research Does Not Show
The evidence that personality can change does not show that every person can choose any trait level on demand. It does not show that one intervention works for everyone. It does not show that all observed change is permanent. It does not show that every reduction in symptoms is a trait change, or that every trait change is simply a symptom change. It does not show that people casually called neurotic necessarily have high measured neuroticism.
It also does not support a moral hierarchy in which lower neuroticism automatically means a better person. Personality traits describe patterns, not human worth. The practical question is whether a pattern supports or obstructs the life a person wants to live.
Can Neurotic People Change? Evidence-Based Bottom Line
Yes. The best current evidence shows that adult personality can change, measured neuroticism can change, and many narrower habits and emotional patterns can become more flexible. Longitudinal research shows substantial individual differences in personality development across the lifespan. Intervention meta-analysis shows that personality traits can shift during psychological interventions. Randomized digital interventions show that people can intentionally move personality traits in desired directions. Recent neuroticism-specific studies are beginning to identify when trait change appears and why some people change more than others.
The conclusion should remain precise: research on neuroticism is research on a measurable personality trait. It is not evidence that every person casually called neurotic has the same trait profile, the same problem, or the same route to change. A useful change plan starts by replacing the label with the actual state, habit, symptom, trait, or condition that needs attention.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a neurotic person really change?
Yes. Many behaviors and emotional patterns people call neurotic can change, and broad personality traits can also change. The amount and type of change vary across people. The label itself does not identify which target is relevant.
Is neuroticism permanent?
No. Neuroticism is relatively stable, which means people often retain some rank-order consistency compared with peers, but longitudinal and intervention research shows meaningful individual change across adulthood and across shorter intervention periods.
Can therapy reduce neuroticism?
Research shows that personality measures, especially emotional stability, can change during psychological interventions. Neuroticism-specific clinical studies have also reported reductions during treatment. Therapy should still be selected for the actual problem or condition being treated rather than for the everyday label neurotic.
Can I change habits without changing my personality?
Yes. A narrow pattern such as repeated reassurance seeking, checking, avoidance, rumination, or self-criticism can become less frequent or less rigid even if a broad personality trait changes little. Functional improvement does not require a complete personality transformation.
Does getting older make people less neurotic?
Some longitudinal studies find average decreases in neuroticism with age, but individual trajectories vary substantially. Age trends describe populations, not guaranteed outcomes for one person.
Can stress make someone seem more neurotic?
Yes. Stress can increase worry, irritability, vigilance, self-doubt, reassurance seeking, and emotional reactivity. A temporary increase in these states is not the same thing as a permanent personality change.
Can a major life event change personality?
Yes, but usually modestly and inconsistently. Meta-analytic evidence finds event-specific personality changes on average, with substantial variation across events and people. A major event is not a personality reset button.
How long does personality change take?
There is no universal timeline. Intervention research has detected change over weeks to months, while lifespan development unfolds over years. Narrow states can change faster than broad traits, and durable change must be distinguished from short-lived fluctuation.
Is “neurotic” a diagnosis?
No. In contemporary everyday use, neurotic is a loose label. Neuroticism is a measurable personality trait, while modern diagnoses use specific clinical criteria. A behavior, trait score, screening result, and diagnosis are different kinds of information.
Do I need to become less sensitive to change?
No. Change can mean becoming more flexible in how you respond to sensitivity rather than eliminating sensitivity itself. A person may remain emotionally responsive while reducing rumination, avoidance, checking, or self-criticism.
What should I track if I want to know whether I am changing?
Track the specific pattern that matters rather than a vague identity label: frequency and duration of worry, time spent checking, recovery after stress, avoidance, reassurance loops, self-critical episodes, or interference with daily life. For clinical symptoms, validated measures and professional assessment are more appropriate than a generic neurotic-person checklist.
Related Articles
References
Bühler, J. L., Orth, U., Bleidorn, W., Weber, E., Kretzschmar, A., Scheling, L., & Hopwood, C. J. (2024). Life Events and Personality Change: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European Journal of Personality, 38(3), 544–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231190219
Cambridge Dictionary. (2026). Neurotic. Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/neurotic
Haehner, P., Hopwood, C. J., Schellenberg, L., Schwaba, T., & Bleidorn, W. (2026). Individual differences in personality trait changes across the lifespan: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 152(4), 420–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000525
Krämer, M. D., Wright, A. J., Haehner, P., Zimmermann, J., Flückiger, C., Hopwood, C. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2026). Self-efficacy predicts differential neuroticism change in a smartphone-based intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000610
Milojev, P., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Normative personality trait development in adulthood: A 6-year cohort-sequential growth model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000121
Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
Stieger, M., Flückiger, C., Rüegger, D., Kowatsch, T., Roberts, B. W., & Allemand, M. (2021). Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2017548118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017548118
Stumpp, N. E., Southward, M. W., Hines, A., Kushner, M. L., Schäuffele, C., Fruhbauerova, M., Bridges, E., Rahman, A., & Sauer-Zavala, S. (2026). When and under what circumstances does neuroticism change in the Unified Protocol? Psychotherapy Research, 36(4), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2521779
Wright, A. J., Haehner, P., Hopwood, C. J., & Bleidorn, W. (2026). A Systematic Review and Taxonomy of Neuroticism Interventions for the General Public. Personality Science, 7, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/27000710261421531